Through the Wormhole - 02x03 - Does Time Really Exist.720p

[stygeanhue]

Does that guy have schizophrenia and mufti-personality disorder confused?

[hemant05071989]

Time might be illusion, I like to read ancient indian books most of them says. ' time do not exist in absolute sense' for ex : "Amazing! I am pure, flawless, I am

peace, I am awareness, I am beyond nature. Alas, I

have been fooled by illusion all this time (ashtavakra)

[hemant05071989]

Time might be illusion, I like to read ancient indian books most of them says. ' time do not exist in absolute sense' ....

[hemant05071989]

3Skitz1Production3 our sight(all other sense) are much slower then speed of light but even if you assume it to be same as speed of light, it won't be instantaneous..

[hemant05071989]

@3Skitz1Production3 out sight and the whole nervous system works slower then speed of light.

[hemant05071989]

........ You can also think of this in term of light as wave suppose you are sitting on a lake and some is producing wave on water surface at middle of the lake, the wave will take some time tu reach to you..same is with light.

[hemant05071989]

@3Skitz1Production3 just think light as tiny particles (photons) as newton described light and they have certain speed in space so they would take some time to come herr on earth from a star...just like a man hitting a wall by bullets, bullets will take some time to reach the wall from the gun....contd

[hemant05071989]

@3Skitz1Production3 you said 'light is omnipresent'(present equally everywhere all the TIME)??? on what basis you are saying that light is present everywhere? Also I would like to know which religion do you believe? as far I know all religions talk about time.

[3Skitz1Production3]

@hemant05071989 light and speed are the source of time if there is anything as time at all. hence light speed. but what happens if you travel faster than the speed of light? you go kcab in time. but still moving forward. such as how i wrote back backward. you tear the fabric of existence. not space time fabric that science thinks we are floating on. in the universe

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 when light hits our retinas the data is converted into electrical signals that are sent to the brain, they are then decoded and the brain fills in the gaps based on memories and after all that the imagine is perceived. the whole process takes 50 milliseconds

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 *image

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 one thing you should remember when watching documentries like these is that alot of ideas they talk about are just ideas. they haven't proved them yet. we dont even know if it would ever be possible for us to travel faster than light and you're saying that you know for certain that when we travel faster than light fabric of existence breaks down?

[3Skitz1Production3]

@staystealth ---tushay but yes thats what im saying. it breaks down stops then reverses in its direction because we can only flow with the fabric of existence in the direction it travels. if we dont' we become seperated from existence. in a way

[TheSnipersLegacy]

@staystealth lol yeah most of it is all thory so you have to be careful while watching

[praisetothesinners]

Through her warmhole with Morgan Bigmen

[WhackCheese]

time is man made. it helps us keep sequence of events in order and gives us a reference of changing things. there is no actual past, there is not actual future, we only think they exist because we have memory, everything is just now. if we had no memory there would be no concept of time.

[bsidewreckchords]

Dude needs to spend more "time" on his guitar styles and his amp sound.

[hemant05071989]

Morgan more...more...more videos

[nickthegrizzly2]

ITS CALLED PSYCHEDELICS, NOW WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!!

[paarsefrikandel]

17:35 "and the elastic nature ....has caused David to wonder whether time is in fact real" maybe David shouldn't play his little "time delay" game so much before he starts wondering if he himself might be in fact real, or schizophrenic

[3Skitz1Production3]

time is an illusion if it wasnt then why can we see light from 13.5 billion years ago in the ''now''/ besides science only thinks it knows the age of the earth. but we really dont. because. God created the earth with marks of age. full grown trees. layers of earth. and so on..

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 we can see light from 13.5 billion years ago because it takes time for light to travel. as for the age of the earth, if you're unclear of how they date the earth's age then clarify your understanding of it rather than just stating "science doesn't know anything. there must be a god who did all this! problem solved" because that makes you sound pretty silly

[3Skitz1Production3]

@staystealth ------ my point was that. yea we ''know'' light travels but why do we see the light ''now'' if we are seeing it 13.5 billion years from the past??? light traveling is an excuse...the point is if there was true differentiation in time, we could NOT see light from the past because the light would be just that... in the past.

[3Skitz1Production3]

@3Skitz1Production3 its all a fluid connection...

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 we call it light from the past only because it traveled to us from very far away. for us its not really light from the past as its just getting to us now in the present. you're trying to compare events to an absolute timeline but there is none, time is relative.

[3Skitz1Production3]

@staystealth --thats too contridicting. we see light from the past in the present. if there was a difference in time and speed. we would see light in its current state from any where. we see light from stars that burned out billions of or millions or years ago. what fills that gap. not time..

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 again you're assuming light should travel instantly. light takes time to travel just like sound. its a lot faster than sound but its not instant. just as when you hear a late sound from a thundering cloud you dont think its sound 'from the past' the light you see from galaxies billions of light years away isnt really light 'from the past' it just took time to get to you

[3Skitz1Production3]

@staystealth --that light is emitted. 13 billion years ago. but showing us a glimpse of the past. i know science says light travels. but at the same time light is not bound by physics. it can actually travel faster than itself when excited by radio active photons...186,282 mps is light ''speed'' but light is omnipresent. therefore. it doesnt travil it is everywhere at once when visible

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 you're contradicting yourself now. you say that light emitted 13 billion years ago gives us a glimpse of the past but at the same time light doesn't travel its everywhere at once. anyway if light doesn't behave the way you intuitively would imagine it to it does not mean that there's anything mystical about light :) it certainly doesn't mean that light is everywhere instantly or the world would look very different

[3Skitz1Production3]

@staystealth ---WHAT IM SAying is that if we are seeing light from that long ago. it should only exist in that time. and the light we see now is emitted now hense no time dialation....speed of sight is faster than speed of light. if we went to the half way point of the sun and earth put a blocade big enough to shadow earth. we would see the shadow the moment it was casted. it theory it would take four minutes to cast the shadow. but how do we see a shadow if the cause of the shadow isnt there???

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 tbh i still don't understand what you're saying. speed of sight? sight is a process that occurs when light enters our eyes not a parallel to the speed of light. and if you blocked the sun's light at the halfway mark between earth and the sun we would still see the sun for 4 minutes and not notice anything different. speed of light isn't a theory its an accepted scientific fact.

[3Skitz1Production3]

@staystealth yes but the speed of sight is faster. you can recognize light faster than it can move.

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 :) right i'll let einstein know that not only was he wrong about light being the fastest thing in the universe he forgot that sight was 'faster'

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 and by the way if by speed of sight you mean the time between the light hitting the retina and the brain registering the image, its not instant.

[3Skitz1Production3]

@staystealth --well. it moves at the speed of light just about as far as i know. so thats for all in tense and purposes instant

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 and light travelling is not an excuse its a measurable phenomenon :) light from the sun takes 8 mins to get to us. this is more easily noticeable for us when we see lightening in a cloud and hear it some seconds later. sound travels slower than light.

[staystealth]

@3Skitz1Production3 *sun's surface

[spanishbull1]

@3Skitz1Production3 yeah god.. bullshit rofl.

[3Skitz1Production3]

@spanishbull1 -- i never said God is bullshit. i fully believe and KNOW God is real

[Stuckherewithyou]

Isn't time reliant on memory?

[hovsec]

time doesnt exist and everything is just frames, a nice idea but is there evidence to back it up? why defend it so much if its just an idea, its like that old man is convinced of it that without any proof, i mean its good to come up with the theory but saying its the truth is too much, even more when your common sense tells you otherwise

[hellokitylv]

@hovsec you don't have to believe it. it's just a possibility. nobody knows anything about anything.

[tom20424]

Surely evolution proves time?

[nonibandoni]

@tom20424 Well, according to this theory time is always there. The past, present and future is right here and right now. Thus evolution is ongoing, it will go on and it has gone. All the events in our lives are playing out right now, but we're simply not experiencing them right now. I find this theory very interesting. xD

[alttaab]

@tom20424 That's like saying entropy proves time.

[Kasuh3]

Of course time EXISTS it is relative to us humans and to all its organisms.

[Roelisc]

@Kasuh3 No it doesn't. Time is an illusion. Organisms age because there is a system of biological process that cause this change. Here is neither in the past, nor the future, it is here. The human convention of time is beneficial to us, it make's sense out of thing's, useful for science, organizing society etc. It's a weird thing when you realize this shit, sorta dawns on you. It's nothing to wrap your head around and intellectualize, it must be experienced and felt, only then will you "get" it.

[Kasuh3]

@Roelisc Don't try to be complicated. I see a car one second and it drives away the next second. Time exists. Time is relative not an illusion. if I can see my own future then time is an illusion, if I never see my future then time is relative. There is currently no technology to go back in time so as of now time is only relative.

[commanderetardo]

the synch on this video isnt working for me. kind of ironic, no ?

[johnaiton]

red dwarf much?

[die101]

these theoretical physicist with their mumbo jumbo, talks without responsibility, coming out with these mumbo jumbo without substantial evidence

[csharp1990]

5:50 am. you know :)

[thelonelychemist]

at 1 am

[crazykailash]

me at 9.14 i swear

[BowlofIndoMee]

I watch this at 9.06 pm lol