Time to test your assertion. Let's compare the fact that humans and chimps share thousands of endogenous retroviral fragments at identical insertion points. Explain this via evolution and creationism.
Even if God exists, science cannot comment. Science is bound by the process of methodological naturalism.
Creationism or any pseudo-science should never be taught in a science class. Even if true, it is simply not science.
If you hold the presupposition and assumption that God can have absolutely no part in the origin of the earth, then you will find lots of evidences that supports your assumption, making it an absolute concrete reality to you. But if you start from the presupposition that God created, then you also can find tons of evidence that will solidify this belief. Evolutions can 'disprove' all creationist evidence, but creationist can 'disprove' all of theirs. facts don't cut it, both require faith
You're wrong about that. Scientists don't actively disbelieve in a God. It's just that there is no reason to presume that a God has done anything because of a total lack of evidence. We know what creation would look like, animals would show up suddenly, without any ancestors. But we can show that all animals have ancestors. Creationism fails.
The truth is that only our Maker, Himself, in person is able to remake us again, if He wants to because there is no one else who can.
There is no other truth than that. The function of hydrogen inside of us proves that both we and the entire universe have a Maker.
watch?v=HoKVVYJ8KJM
JungleJargon 3 months ago
I quite like the votebotting. You know, Creationists, this says more about you then it does about this video.
TheCritRocket 2 years ago
Time to test your assertion. Let's compare the fact that humans and chimps share thousands of endogenous retroviral fragments at identical insertion points. Explain this via evolution and creationism.
Even if God exists, science cannot comment. Science is bound by the process of methodological naturalism.
Creationism or any pseudo-science should never be taught in a science class. Even if true, it is simply not science.
djarm67 3 years ago
If you hold the presupposition and assumption that God can have absolutely no part in the origin of the earth, then you will find lots of evidences that supports your assumption, making it an absolute concrete reality to you. But if you start from the presupposition that God created, then you also can find tons of evidence that will solidify this belief. Evolutions can 'disprove' all creationist evidence, but creationist can 'disprove' all of theirs. facts don't cut it, both require faith
forevergrasping 3 years ago
You're wrong about that. Scientists don't actively disbelieve in a God. It's just that there is no reason to presume that a God has done anything because of a total lack of evidence. We know what creation would look like, animals would show up suddenly, without any ancestors. But we can show that all animals have ancestors. Creationism fails.
TheStig000 3 years ago 4
Yay science! XD
SchoolrejecT 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video lolz, my names Gabriella, im feelin n0rty and h0rn3y if any guyz wana chat im usually on
___ FriendlyFlirts..dot..COM ___ my username there is Gabriella-kjksqpihwnv chat soon ;)
gabriellecardoso 3 years ago