At a certain point, a president must own a presidency. For George W. Bush that point came eight months in, when 9/11 happened. From that point on, the presidency—all his decisions, all the credit and blame for them—was his. The American people didn't hold him responsible for what led up to 9/11, but they held him responsible for everything after it. Obama, in office a month longer than Bush was when 9/11 hit, now owns his presidency. It's his now. He gets the credit and the blame. Fix it.
exsactly, its funny how healthcare mustbe budget neutral and wars can run debt with no end or plan in site! Funny how you can have no bid contracts that does support productivity as the best cost to the tax payer but want to cut medicade, education, other social services, funny how you will get more jail time for shop lifting at walmart than bankers who riped off billions with inhanced ponze scemes, store it offshore & then ask for a bailout & no one wants to force them to take less
Obviously Mike Allen's 'sources' are those AGAINST a public option. Pelosi and WH's irritation is justified because the Dem House leadership the false report comes out the day the Speaker is take a roll call of House Dem votes for the robust public option.
COMMITTED to the public option? No, Ms. Jarrett, that is not what the Pres has been saying up til now. If he is committed to it now, that is good news!
Until now he has been saying basically 'I think a public option would be great but we'll see' not that we MUST get one and will come out and fight for it, which is what 'committed' implies.
A close advisor to the Pres does not come to the media with a new choice of words on an important issue if she is not trying to convey a new message from the administration.
This has been flagged as spam show
At a certain point, a president must own a presidency. For George W. Bush that point came eight months in, when 9/11 happened. From that point on, the presidency—all his decisions, all the credit and blame for them—was his. The American people didn't hold him responsible for what led up to 9/11, but they held him responsible for everything after it. Obama, in office a month longer than Bush was when 9/11 hit, now owns his presidency. It's his now. He gets the credit and the blame. Fix it.
dkkght46 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why did this get marked as spam lol.
JCJ77 2 years ago
Republicans have no idea of the infinite power they are up against.
Richardgwm 2 years ago 2
PUBLIC OPTION NOW!
CynicalSavior 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
jarret CALL CALL GLENN BECK NOW!! U FUCKING COMMY BTW HOWS VAN JONES DOING??? BITCH!
savior02 2 years ago
NO MANDATES!!!!
leftygunz704 2 years ago
HOW WE PAY FOR THE PUBLIC OPTION:
UHC CEO Stephen Hemsley has $745 MILLION in stock options. 2007 pay $13.2mil; 2008 $3.2 mil.
CIGNA CEO Edward Hanway made $120mil in last 5yrs. Stock options = $28mil.
Humana CEO Michael McCallister's made $10.3mil in 07. $1,017,308 in 08. Stock options = $60mil.
LARGEST GOLDEN PARACHUTE in history of corporate America goes to William McGuire of UnitedHealth 1.4 BILLION DOLLARS!
How many DENIED angiograms MRI's & dialysis treatments does that take?
BLOOD MONEY!
baronmorris 2 years ago 9
exsactly, its funny how healthcare mustbe budget neutral and wars can run debt with no end or plan in site! Funny how you can have no bid contracts that does support productivity as the best cost to the tax payer but want to cut medicade, education, other social services, funny how you will get more jail time for shop lifting at walmart than bankers who riped off billions with inhanced ponze scemes, store it offshore & then ask for a bailout & no one wants to force them to take less
nuumskee 2 years ago 3
Obviously Mike Allen's 'sources' are those AGAINST a public option. Pelosi and WH's irritation is justified because the Dem House leadership the false report comes out the day the Speaker is take a roll call of House Dem votes for the robust public option.
tates1a 2 years ago 4
i hope they go with the opt out plan and blue states can see how great the public option is
tra12345iscool 2 years ago 3
Brilliant political interrogative, Joe; 'The other side says you're not winning, so there!'
Jarrett: "We'll see...",
meaning; 'WTF do you think you're talking about? Obama's whippin' conservative ass like a Sunday souffle'
dogstar7 2 years ago 2
thx for the laugh dogstar7. sometimes things get a little too sirius, you know? ;-)
cheers
baronmorris 2 years ago
Dont the insurance companies already compete? wtf
MaladaptiveCatalyst 2 years ago
No, as a matter of fact: They Don't!
That's why Congress is involved in repealing the anti-trust exemptions that insurance companies enjoy.
dogstar7 2 years ago 5
no, insurance companies don't compete.
amazingly, they have an exemption from federal anti-trust laws.
not only do they not compete, they are immoral entities that profit from disease and make money from death.
jasonsadventure 2 years ago 2
Car insurance companies do.
RodgersRevolution 2 years ago
COMMITTED to the public option? No, Ms. Jarrett, that is not what the Pres has been saying up til now. If he is committed to it now, that is good news!
SubmarinerAndroid 2 years ago
Point to a moment in time when Obama was 'off message' on a Public Option. You can't.
dogstar7 2 years ago 2
Until now he has been saying basically 'I think a public option would be great but we'll see' not that we MUST get one and will come out and fight for it, which is what 'committed' implies.
A close advisor to the Pres does not come to the media with a new choice of words on an important issue if she is not trying to convey a new message from the administration.
SubmarinerAndroid 2 years ago
word
baronmorris 2 years ago