I love how they talk about animals as a spiritual equal, making them okay to have sex with, but then in the next scene the women are making meatballs. :P I didn't realize it was okay to eat your "spiritual equal".
I'm usually quite open-minded towards peoples choices about sexuality, religion, etc... :O But this is horrifying!! Surely it's considered rape, since the animals are unable to "voice" their objection? Frankly anyone who chooses to have sex with animals or children is mentally sick in the head and needs serious help.
Seeing that by mans standards we are animals, and the KJV says we are a beast shows that to make sex with an animals illegal makes sex of all kinds illegal. God called mans wisdom foolish, and this proves it. 1 Corinthians 3:19, Humans in white surgical dress or whatever color will-cut off of the non human animal organ in a sterile environment. Humans accept them doing that like Adam, and eve accepted the words of Satan over the words of God. Then they blamed everyone except themselves.
A misconception human need to get over is this: We are animals that are born, and die, breathe, eat, drink, shit, and piss, and we are made of eukaryote cells, and we have sex like an animal too. Physiologically, biologically, scientifically, chemically, microscopically, and we have instincts of the fight or flight response, and territorial instincts of an animal putting up fences, and no not trespass signs. Then KJV its self says we are a beast to back all of this up in Ecclesiastes 3; 18-20.
This is not about two consenting adults, but those poor horses would sure need a hard on to engage in such an act. Guess that would be a horses way of saying.... let's get it on!
And I would appreciate the opinion of one who didn't advocate the abuse of animals and children with pitiful, child-like reasoning. Your thoughts could never interest, nor appeal to a stable active member of society, only disgust. That is all, I'd rather not converse with someone such as yourself. Thank you.
@Mugabe69 You want to call the one who has sex an abuser,and then gawk at jet fighters that kill our young humans with pride, and reverence the one who have them march to their death decorating them with medals, and call the dead in war heroes, and the maimed in body the same. The humans against the Pedo or zoo disgusts me. Humans against the sexualities are like the Sodomites sacrificing animals, and oppressing humans, read KJV Isaiah;1; 10 - down from there, and you will see what I am saying.
@kobidobidog You may have noticed that I didn't reply to your last inflammatory and feebly formed argument; this is because you appear to be either taking the piss and just being silly (in which case, ha ha, very good psycho impression) or you apparently suffer from some form of delusional mental disorder and as such, I don't feel right arguing with someone who is clearly ill. You have my pity but please, please seek professional help before you cause harm to someone other that your damaged self
@Mugabe69 Condemn whoever, and have the one who condemns in you. Do you want life in your soul or death in your soul. So far you have chosen death for your soul. Judge yourself, and chose life for your soul. We are animals.The human giving the children guilt about nudity, and sex are the ones psychologically damaging them. You are one of the damaged adults wanting to crucify the Pedo;s, zoosexuals, and whoever like the riotous crowd wanted a perfect man killed.You know what I said is true 100%.
@R872214 Humans should put the sexual things to rest, and that in, and of its self will bring peace. We are animals, and called of all things a beast even in the KJV. Therefore all opposition to the zoo, and whatever sexuality should come to an end. Ecc; 3:18; I said in mine heart concerning the estate of the sons of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselves are beasts. For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; zoo is good, war is sick.
Since animals cannot give consent to humans, humans having sex with animals is ALWAYS an abuse of power, it is ALWAYS sexual assault, and it is ALWAYS animal abuse.
These people need psychological help, and their animals need protection.
@MilesMany Hmm... I'm going to play devil's advocate with you here (and by no means do I stand with the "deviants" showcased in this video) -- but, animals don't give their consent to be our pets in the first place. They don't consent to get neutered/spayed. They don't consent to be taken for walks, nor do they have a say in what they're fed. Veterinary visits are could be far more traumatic/damaging. Keeping animals as pets at all is already an abuse of power. Don't you think?
@KDMatt I do agree with you actually. I'm an animals rights advocate, vegan, and I don't support pet stores, or breeding animals to sell. That said, it gets a little murky when you look at the crisis of overpopulation of domesticated animals.
I did take in two cats from an animal shelter. They arrived there nearly starved from living on the street. Now they are free to roam, but they always come back here for shelter, food and comfort. They have as many rights as is possible to give them.
@KDMatt Also ... a good way to look this, or how I do anyway, is treating your animals as you would your own children. Would I take my child to the doctor when he/she requires it? Yes. Would I take my cats to vet? Yes. Would I have sex with my child or cat? Absolutely not because that would be abuse.
In an ideal world, there would be only a small population of cats living in an area that naturally supported them, and no one would be keeping them as pets. Unfortunately we're not there.
@MilesMany Ah! It's so refreshing to get some intelligent discourse on youtube comments! -- I've always been an advocate of treating animals like equals (to an extent), however, I think the distinction a zoophile might make with your analogy is that animals grow into adulthood, and possess reproductive hormones (ergo, making them amenable, to a certain extent, to sexual activity), whereas children do not. Also, is it ever ethical to take away some rights if it benefits the animal? Thoughts?
@KDMatt (1/3) Ha, I know what you mean! I almost thanked you initially for just being so civilized with your comment!
How I see the animal/consent issue is that even though animals grow up and can have sex with each other, we must always remember our position of privilege and power over them. All sexual consent laws in North America state that consent cannot be given if it's an abuse of power (this is why hospital staff can't have sex with adult humans who are brain-injured, for example ...
@KDMatt (2/3) Actually, they can't have sex with ANY patients, period, for this same "abuse of power" reason).
Essentially, growing into sexual maturity or having hormones has nothing to do with consent. Because humans are in this position of power and privilege over animals, we have a responsiblity towards them to protect them from harm, which is where I draw the comparison to children.
@KDMatt (3/3) Another point here is that it is safe to assume that sex means something totally different and is experienced differently by other species. Humans (and possibly other primates) may have sex for pleasure, but does a horse, dog, or cat enjoy sex? Not by the looks of things. In any case, animals can't communicate this with us. Have you ever seen a horse initiate sex with a person? Me neither.
Again, thanks again for the smart discussion and your great manners! Cheers.
@MilesMany Bravo mate. The question though, are all cases of zoophilia necessarily abuses of power? Perhaps that's rhetorical, but I'm hard pressed to think that every single documented case was a one sided affair (no pun intended there). While certainly it is well known that only a handful of species on this planet go out of their way to have sex for pleasure, that doesn't preclude the possibility that other species (most notable, per your example, dogs and horses) can't still enjoy it (cont'd)
@KDMatt I think they are all abuses of power, yeah. When you say, "there is no way that the animal understands the implications..." that is exactly where the deal-breaker is for me. I can't get past it. I'm curious what you think though: you did refer to these folks as "deviants." Where does the ethical line occur for you? (Or maybe it's just the "gross factor" that draws the line for you? In which case I would say, FAIR ENOUGH. ;)
@MilesMany I try to restrain myself from having a gut reaction to things like this because I feel like it it a much more complex issue than just 'consent' or 'abuse of power.' As it stands, I think people are already, by and large pretty much okay with abusing their power over animals -- it happens every day, and nobody thinks twice about it! So for me, that's where that particular line of reasoning starts falling apart. I also feel, like I said, that animals are capable of enjoying sex -- (c)
@KDMatt I do agree that there's hypocrisy when people think it's okay to use animals for food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation, and then recoil at the thought of using them for sex. However, that gut reaction of "this is wrong!" about sex with animals is powerful data about our values.
I would hope it would wake us from a cultural anesthetic that keeps us unquestioning our usual use of animals, rather than to say, "Well I eat animals, maybe it's okay to have sex with them too."
@MilesMany Oh definitely. We're also a culture that condones euthanasia for sick animals, but not for sick people. If nothing else, it's fair to say we're not equals. --- For the record, I am a shameless meat eater, and enjoy keeping pets, so this is probably a big part of why we draw our respective lines in different places. Opinions are lovely. :)
@MilesMany -- and are capable of seeing physiological and psychological benefits. So when you accept that society is basically already okay with completely stripping animals of their power and consent, and consider that no harm is being done to the animal (that in fact they might be seeing measurable benefits), it's really a struggle for me to immediately label it as "wrong." However, that doesn't mean I feel like it's "right," either. I could imagine certain situations in which this sort of (c)
@MilesMany (c) practice could be 'acceptable' by these standards, but I also see the possibility of many other situations in which it violates these "ideals." If this subject were approached more as the consideration of intimate relations between humans and animals (as opposed to a human sexual fetish -- in which only people benefit), I think the conversation about it would be drastically different. However, I think that there are many zoophiles who, themselves, do not practice it under such (c)
@MilesMany (c) arrangements of mutual respect or love, which is, again, where their argument starts to fall apart. So yes, I do think under certain circumstances, we'd be remiss to deprive both partners of the experience, I'm also hardpressed to ignore that it probably most cases do not operate this way. In case you're curious, while I readily acknowledge that the animals in my life have latent sexual desires that I'm certain they want fulfilled, I'm not in any hurry to volunteer myself for it.
@KDMatt ... maybe what we need is to move towards fostering more civility towards our fellow species, rather than away from it by pondering whether we should be able to use animals for MORE than what we already do.
(Maybe it's a good time to mention that I realize you're not advocating sleeping with animals or anything. The discussion it just getting my fire burning! Thanks for listening. :)
@MilesMany (con'td) In fact there is a lot of evidence that suggests that they enjoy many of the same physiological benefits from sex that humans do (i.e. increased endorphines, elevated blood flow, expent calories, etc. etc.). If a zoophile were to argue that it was not just for his benefit, but for the animal's as well, based on this reasoning, I might be more inclined to give him/her some credence. Currently though, watching this documentary, it seems like a shallow, one-sided practice(cont'd
@MilesMany (cont'd) For that matter, there have been documented cases of people being approached by animals looking for a sexual encounter. However, the challenge to using this as an arguing point is that there is no way of knowing if the -animal- understands what the implications of that encounter would be. On the other hand though, it has been shown that some of these aforementioned species do masturbate from tiem to time. So perhaps it's possible for them to seek release afterall... Thoughts?
Do we make a distinction between fcuking animals and being fckued by animals to put it crudely? The former would be abuse, the latter is just well... consenting. Lets get past our own personal revulsion here.
I love that they always phrase it in terms of "the animal has NEEDS!"
Uh...no. You like sticking your dick in horses--let's just call it what it is. Lets not pretend that the horses of the world are just sitting around wishing and waiting for the day that these hideous motherfuckers would come nail them.
Basing my judgement on the length of most of these comments, you people just LOVE talking about this stuff. Even if you claim hatred toward these zoophiles, something inside of you is fascinated. Perhaps you, too, once fancied an animal sexually.
Disable automatic updates * When ever you have ever hit rock bottom in your life and you feel depressed and so alone... always remember folks... Things could ALWAYS be worse... "At least I'm not fucking a horse"
I found it really easy to masturbate over this video. I'm going to link this video on my personal website that features me shoving beer bottles side ways into my anus then me squeezing it back out into another man's mouth.
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo ...the power they have over them, nor have the desire to take advantage of them. Children tend to love & trust their parents no matter what, in the same way that animals form emotional bonds to their owners. I hope you don't think that I'm insulting. Because although I disagree with your actions and viewpoints, I am interested in your point of view on the subject & it's not my desire to insult you. Like I said, for whatever reason I don't think zoophiles are as abhorrent...
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo ...be trying to understand their way of thinking and countering it with my own) but I do see animals a little like children, before they are taught the morals and standards of average society, are sexually open (without knowing the finer details about it). Children see no problems with walking around naked and, without trying to sound too Freudian, flirting with their parents and other adults. But most adults will have the morals and constraints to not take advantage of...
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo The last replies were from a friend of mine (@meh29). I just wanted to add another opinion to the mix. I cannot show you evidence that animals can't consent because I have never tried to engage in sexual contact with an animal. I just know that animals are considered below human intelligence. I don't mean to keep comparing zoophilia with paedophilia since I truly don't believe they are in the same league (if it were a paedophile I was talking to here, I would in no means...
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo Animals cannot consent either. It is an abuse of a position of power over a being that lacks the faculties to understand the power relationship that is being abused, just as a child or vunerable adult does. I don't know how you can possibly stomach taking advantage of someone like that. It's like raping an unconscious person. There is simply no capacity to give consent.
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo Incest, sex with children and sex with animals are wrong and abhorrent for the same reason - power dynamics. Gay sex is not wrong because gay people have sex with other consenting adult humans with no underlying unbalanced power dynamic. Incest and paedophilia is wrong because people/children trust people in their family/their elders - incest and paedophilia takes advantage of this trust to abuse.
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo Incest, sex with children and sex with animals are wrong and abhorrent for the same reason - power dynamics. Gay sex is not wrong because gay people have sex with other consenting adult humans with no underlying unbalanced power dynamic. Incest and paedophilia is wrong because people/children trust people in their family/their elders - incest and paedophilia takes advantage of this trust to abuse.
@CopafaceBabyFirefly - That being said, WHY does it make people feel sick? That feeling is a result of the societal constraints on behavior. You haven't yet answered the why. Rape is another subject all together. @dogsneedpleasuretoo - I think you're coming up with situations just to prove your point. I also don't agree that " an open zoosexual so people get used to us and learn about us." That's not a positive thing to be telling people.
@mayamorphine I'm no scientist or theologian. I just feel that taboos are there for a reason. In the same way that humans use laws in an attempt to stop bad things happenings, morals and things that the majority find unthinkable are there in attempt to stop what we see as bad things from happening. I'm not trying to class murder or paedophilia in the same league as zoophilia but maybe they're all seen as wrong for good reasons.
@mayamorphine Where those good reasons originated from psychologically and in an evolutional context, I have no idea. As I've said, I don't think I'm qualified or learned enough to form real opinions on that. I just think it was a necessary part of human evolution: to decide what is good and what isn't and form taboos to go against the 'bad'.
@blondecat666 - I haven't actually answered it. There are many sexual acts that are socially acceptable in one culture or another that do not produce offspring. Anal intercourse, fellatio, cunnilingus, etc. @CopafaceBabyFirefly and @dogsneedpleasuretoo I'm really glad that this conversation is actually happening. It's good to see other logical people, regardless of background or opinion.
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo For the record, I'm not against homosexuality. Because homosexual relations are between consenting adult humans. And I don't see anything wrong with that.
As to your earlier comment, I don't believe that animals can give consent. Then again, I wouldn't know.
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo I'm never going to think that sex with animals or incest is okay. In that reply, it appeared that you said incest is okay as long as it doesn't involve reproduction and I'm assuming your thoughts on sex with animals is the same. I honestly think taboos are there for a reason and I think animals are a little too different from humans in their activities. I hope I don't come across mean or judgemental but this is just what I, and the majority of others, think.
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo It goes against nature. And like I replied to someone else, I've read that for many animals, rape is the common reproduction method. (Although I can't be held to that as a fact because I'm not sure if it's true, I just read it somewhere). Animals are just too different from us for it to be right. If you'e turning to animals for love/pleasure then I think there is definitely something wrong with yo.
@CopafaceBabyFirefly If it goes against nature, then how does it end up happening? I think that if sex with animals defies nature, it doesn't defy nature as much as airplanes do. An aluminum tube that flies in the sky, propelled by fuel-burning engines, carrying people thousands of miles to places they would never go otherwise. Is defying nature (whatever that means) enough to make something wrong?
How does an airplane defy nature? An airplane uses physics and can be explained by science as to how and why flight is possible...it no more defies nature than a plastic blag carried in the air by the wind. Now this stuff, these people have some serious psychological issues.
@MaxamillianArturo They may have psychological issues, but how do they defy nature? What is nature, and how can it be defied? If it really is possible to defy nature (is it?), then is it necessarily bad to defy nature? I don't actually believe airplanes defy nature. The only things that can defy nature (in my understanding of nature) are miracles and the supernatural, which aren't necessarily bad or possible.
@MaxamillianArturo How so? What "logic" does it defy? Might it be the logical decision for some people but not others? I see logic as choosing the best means to an end, but I'm not entirely convinced that the ends themselves can be chosen logically. If I see something and ask "why?", then likewise question the explanation, and keep questioning what comes next, eventually I find something that doesn't seem logical. Most people use "logical" to mean "agrees with me".
@qwexas Its illogical and unnatural because the purpose of copulation is for the propogation of ones own species. In this instance such a thing is impossible because it is impossible for different species to mate successfully.
@MaxamillianArturo If sex is for propagating the species (says who?), then it's illogical & unnatural for post-menopausal women to have sex, since they are no longer able to conceive. Most of the sex people engage in would be unnatural and/or illogical because conception is not intended, condoms often used, people not ready for children. Do you think aging women should not have sex? Do you think that what is natural is always the same as what is logical?
@MaxamillianArturo Then why have bestiality & homosexuality not been bred out? What about all the non-sexual counterproductive behaviors, like using drugs? You make it sound like evolution has a plan, like it's a conscious being, rather than something random.
You didn't answer all my questions.
What do you think of women past menopause having sex?
Is what is logic always what is natural, and is either always what is right?
@qwexas Well, women having sex past menopause is their perogative I suppose but definitely messed up seeing as how when gravity takes its toll its kind of an unpleasant sight to think of people from that age and on coppulating but simply because people age this does not take away from the fact that people are sexual beings or have sexual urges.
Homosexuality nad bestaility have not been bred out because the genes which make them possible persist regardless of if these people repoduce or not.
@MaxamillianArturo Well, some people have urges to do things that don't seem logical. If the purpose of sex is propagation, what is the purpose of our offspring? Is it logical for us to bring another generation of our species into this world?
I suspect you're reasoning backward from a conclusion; deciding it's wrong first, then looking to nature & logic for support. Try starting with the question "is it wrong?", then looking for an answer, without prejudice.
@MaxamillianArturo If we're here to reproduce, and our offspring will be here to reproduce, then the consequence of not reproducing is that there is no next generation. So what? Are they necessary? Does it matter if we don't breed with humans? Does it matter what we do with sexual beings of other species? The world's population is huge & growing exponentially, so it's logical to stop some people from reproducing or we all suffer crowding. Google this phrase: Voluntary Human Extinction Movement.
@MaxamillianArturo Is it logical / natural for you to be here online watching this video & arguing about bestiality? Does this keep you alive? Does it help you breed? Please tell me what makes your current behavior natural & logical; otherwise, you & I might be engaging in an unnatural, illogical behavior right now, not so different from bestiality.
@qwexas Building and functioning an aeroplane is a development in human intelligence. Having sex with animals is an abnormality in human sexual behaviour. People don't get outraged at the thought of an aeroplane but they do at the thought of a man having sexual relations with a horse.
@CopafaceBabyFirefly Most people in modern times don't get outraged by planes, but if you showed one to a medieval person, he would think it was witchcraft. Actually, some people are terrified of flying. Vegetarians, especially vegans, may be outraged by meat. There is no unified opinion of "people". Some people are not outraged by bestiality. Some people are outraged over things other people are not. You speak of "people" too generally. Intelligence is abnormal, most folks can't design planes.
Notice, I'm not arguing that this is OK, just that everyone's preconceptions of these kinds of phenomenon need to be re-evaluated to ascertain their source. Simply scapegoating by calling this 'wrong' and saying these people "need to be taken out back for a bullet buffet" is neither productive nor positive in a larger view. If it really is a problem, understand it first, and figure out a way to treat it. Less hate, more temperance, and yes, even love.
@CopafaceBabyFirefly As an anthropologist, I have to ask a bigger question than the answer you're proposing-and that question is WHY interspecies sexual relations are considered wrong in society. At its core, the 'wrongness' of zoophilia is no different than a child learning it's not acceptable to be naked in public. The taboo a societally created value that encourages the reproduction of our own species, and, I argue, the denial of pleasure, however strange.
@mayamorphine You have actually answered your own question, zoophilia (or other paraphilias) are considered 'wrong' because it interferes with the reason that we, humans are engeging in sexual acts, which is primerily to have offsprings. So society made all paraphilias unaccepted or illegal, subconsciously. Not that I agree with any of the paraphilias :-)
@mayamorphine It's just one of those things. Like sex with children, sex with someone you're related to. You just don't do it. It happens, but it makes the majority feel sick. If it wasn't for the morals & rules of society, things like rape would be okay because 'sex is to reproduce & reproduction is necessary'. But we don't see it like that. Even though I've heard many animals' reproduction method is rape (don't hold me to that, I just read it somewhere). Animals are just too different.
I think you both need to re-evaluate some of the opinions and feelings that these people have. How do either of you feel about homosexuality? Transgenderism? How is this any more different than that?
@mayamorphine Maybe because animals are not the same as a consenting adult humans. Homosexuality and transgenderism are different because it's still the same species.
@mayamorphine Because homesexuals etc.are able to give INFORMED CONSENT to sexual acts. Zoophiles (like paedophiles) take advantage of the weaker partner who has little or no understanding of the act itself and animals like scared kids dont talk. That's one of the reasons that both are illegal. Im unsure why you even mentioned homosexuals etc.. You're trying to make a point but the comparison doesn't make any sense. Maybe you need to re-evaluate your opinions and feelings as theyre a bit skewed
@Mugabe69 All humans are paedophiles. That is because all of us like sex, and all of us like gazing at ogling, and cooing over cute baby animal pictures, and surprise they are naked as the day they were born with no man made covering. Humans with the evil in them will attempt to make one man that dies worse than another man that dies.
@kobidobidog Once again, that is a perfect example of the skewed kind of reasoning that a paedophile will use to justify their abhorrent actions. Your argument lacks even a basic coherrence and logic. Please don't think that I'm accusing you of being a child abuser, just highlighting the comparison.......
@Mugabe69 Condemning is stone throwing, correct? Jesus who is perfect did not throw a stone correct? Want to be like Jesus ius don't throw a stone at the human called a Pedo. Do you know what condemn, and be condemned means?
@kobidobidog........A child abuser, much as an animal abuser, will try to build an ethos and vainly scrabble for justification that what they do is 'natural' or 'right'. The plain truth is far simpler, some people are sexually aroused by children or animals, some of these people enjoy the degredation of their subjects, others believe that they are 'loving and caring' but all of them, without exception are damaged individuals and their actions are indisputably WRONG.
I love how they talk about animals as a spiritual equal, making them okay to have sex with, but then in the next scene the women are making meatballs. :P I didn't realize it was okay to eat your "spiritual equal".
violentviolet13 1 week ago
I wonder how many of you people who think this is disgusting, eat meat?
Slaughtering animals and eating them is no problem
But having sex is sick and disgusting?
People are really, really weird. Probably because of religion.
WolvesOfEurope 2 weeks ago
@WolvesOfEurope That is pretty stupid, eating and sex are completely different.
anxaje 1 day ago
@anxaje So, why is sex so much of a problem?
WolvesOfEurope 23 hours ago
@WolvesOfEurope Because rape is wrong?
anxaje 15 hours ago
@anxaje You're saying that whenever animals mate, it's rape? Strange.
Words aren't the only way to communicate. Infact, 70% of our communication consists of body language, rather than words. Yes, that's a proven fact.
WolvesOfEurope 14 hours ago
@WolvesOfEurope No when humans mate with non humans.
anxaje 11 hours ago
I doubt those horses would even feel their little wieners.... lol
WolvesOfEurope 2 weeks ago
Fuck me this is abnormal, talking to them like sexual objects /punk
Ghost572 2 weeks ago
WHAT THE FUCK
humphrey6000 2 weeks ago
I'm usually quite open-minded towards peoples choices about sexuality, religion, etc... :O But this is horrifying!! Surely it's considered rape, since the animals are unable to "voice" their objection? Frankly anyone who chooses to have sex with animals or children is mentally sick in the head and needs serious help.
BulletprufZombie 3 weeks ago
i resent the word "crusade" to describe a sickos desire to spread his sickness to the world
lovellespice 3 weeks ago
disturbing.
lovellespice 3 weeks ago
I am on the weird side of the internet again.
SilverSinspawn 3 weeks ago
Fucking crackers...sick savage animals.....cavedwellers.
BlkprydeX2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Seeing that by mans standards we are animals, and the KJV says we are a beast shows that to make sex with an animals illegal makes sex of all kinds illegal. God called mans wisdom foolish, and this proves it. 1 Corinthians 3:19, Humans in white surgical dress or whatever color will-cut off of the non human animal organ in a sterile environment. Humans accept them doing that like Adam, and eve accepted the words of Satan over the words of God. Then they blamed everyone except themselves.
kobidobidog 1 month ago
Comment removed
kobidobidog 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A misconception human need to get over is this: We are animals that are born, and die, breathe, eat, drink, shit, and piss, and we are made of eukaryote cells, and we have sex like an animal too. Physiologically, biologically, scientifically, chemically, microscopically, and we have instincts of the fight or flight response, and territorial instincts of an animal putting up fences, and no not trespass signs. Then KJV its self says we are a beast to back all of this up in Ecclesiastes 3; 18-20.
kobidobidog 1 month ago
This is not about two consenting adults, but those poor horses would sure need a hard on to engage in such an act. Guess that would be a horses way of saying.... let's get it on!
Angel19403 1 month ago
so fucking sick.
joliecolly 1 month ago
You know, there's a reason why humans can't reproduce with animals.
19409 2 months ago
"Boffing the beef" WTF?
uneekalex 2 months ago
10:10 The cats like, "what in the FUCK did he stick up my ass earlier?" ...he's scarred for life lol
ThaKutthroatKilla 2 months ago 2
@ThaKutthroatKilla Haha yeah the cat looks really depressed, staring at the floor.
honeypower 1 month ago
See what happens when you have sexual relationships with horses? God gives you a blinding disease.
TuerilLuna 2 months ago
Notice none of them are Hot models with nice bods.. They are lazy fat hillbillies that can't get laid..
TuerilLuna 2 months ago 7
"hello pretty boy" oh my god stop!
Mik3isda8om8 2 months ago 15
It's legal in Germany, BTW.
TechnoEstate 2 months ago
Some of these posts are scary. This subject should make normal people feel very uncomfortable
AWood28 3 months ago 3
And I would appreciate the opinion of one who didn't advocate the abuse of animals and children with pitiful, child-like reasoning. Your thoughts could never interest, nor appeal to a stable active member of society, only disgust. That is all, I'd rather not converse with someone such as yourself. Thank you.
Mugabe69 3 months ago
@Mugabe69 You want to call the one who has sex an abuser,and then gawk at jet fighters that kill our young humans with pride, and reverence the one who have them march to their death decorating them with medals, and call the dead in war heroes, and the maimed in body the same. The humans against the Pedo or zoo disgusts me. Humans against the sexualities are like the Sodomites sacrificing animals, and oppressing humans, read KJV Isaiah;1; 10 - down from there, and you will see what I am saying.
kobidobidog 3 months ago
@kobidobidog You may have noticed that I didn't reply to your last inflammatory and feebly formed argument; this is because you appear to be either taking the piss and just being silly (in which case, ha ha, very good psycho impression) or you apparently suffer from some form of delusional mental disorder and as such, I don't feel right arguing with someone who is clearly ill. You have my pity but please, please seek professional help before you cause harm to someone other that your damaged self
Mugabe69 3 months ago
@Mugabe69 I am telling you what humans accept that is really bad. Are insults the only thing left in your pitiful arsenal?
kobidobidog 3 months ago
Comment removed
kobidobidog 3 months ago
Comment removed
yummieyummie123 3 months ago
Thumbs up if you got here from efukt.com
johnnyrocketfinger69 3 months ago
@Mugabe69 Condemn whoever, and have the one who condemns in you. Do you want life in your soul or death in your soul. So far you have chosen death for your soul. Judge yourself, and chose life for your soul. We are animals.The human giving the children guilt about nudity, and sex are the ones psychologically damaging them. You are one of the damaged adults wanting to crucify the Pedo;s, zoosexuals, and whoever like the riotous crowd wanted a perfect man killed.You know what I said is true 100%.
kobidobidog 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Such low self-esteem...
itachi000797 3 months ago
Strrrrraaaaaange!!!!!!
williamblair11 3 months ago
@R872214 Humans should put the sexual things to rest, and that in, and of its self will bring peace. We are animals, and called of all things a beast even in the KJV. Therefore all opposition to the zoo, and whatever sexuality should come to an end. Ecc; 3:18; I said in mine heart concerning the estate of the sons of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselves are beasts. For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; zoo is good, war is sick.
kobidobidog 3 months ago
@Mugabe69 Same to you, dearie.
mayamorphine 3 months ago
@mayamorphine homosexuals are both humans ie both from the same species
petsmartfallfestival 3 months ago
how disgusting
KingManga358 4 months ago
'This is the most incredible turn on"
Then Chris Hanson jumps out of the bush!
"Have a seat right there"
hystoryan 4 months ago
HOLY SHIT THE FACES I MADE WHILE WATCHING THIS ASKDFJHALSKDFJHADSFA DDDDDDDDD:
poohbearnikki 4 months ago
Since animals cannot give consent to humans, humans having sex with animals is ALWAYS an abuse of power, it is ALWAYS sexual assault, and it is ALWAYS animal abuse.
These people need psychological help, and their animals need protection.
MilesMany 4 months ago
@MilesMany Hmm... I'm going to play devil's advocate with you here (and by no means do I stand with the "deviants" showcased in this video) -- but, animals don't give their consent to be our pets in the first place. They don't consent to get neutered/spayed. They don't consent to be taken for walks, nor do they have a say in what they're fed. Veterinary visits are could be far more traumatic/damaging. Keeping animals as pets at all is already an abuse of power. Don't you think?
KDMatt 4 months ago
@KDMatt I do agree with you actually. I'm an animals rights advocate, vegan, and I don't support pet stores, or breeding animals to sell. That said, it gets a little murky when you look at the crisis of overpopulation of domesticated animals.
I did take in two cats from an animal shelter. They arrived there nearly starved from living on the street. Now they are free to roam, but they always come back here for shelter, food and comfort. They have as many rights as is possible to give them.
MilesMany 4 months ago
@KDMatt Also ... a good way to look this, or how I do anyway, is treating your animals as you would your own children. Would I take my child to the doctor when he/she requires it? Yes. Would I take my cats to vet? Yes. Would I have sex with my child or cat? Absolutely not because that would be abuse.
In an ideal world, there would be only a small population of cats living in an area that naturally supported them, and no one would be keeping them as pets. Unfortunately we're not there.
MilesMany 4 months ago
@MilesMany Ah! It's so refreshing to get some intelligent discourse on youtube comments! -- I've always been an advocate of treating animals like equals (to an extent), however, I think the distinction a zoophile might make with your analogy is that animals grow into adulthood, and possess reproductive hormones (ergo, making them amenable, to a certain extent, to sexual activity), whereas children do not. Also, is it ever ethical to take away some rights if it benefits the animal? Thoughts?
KDMatt 4 months ago
@KDMatt (1/3) Ha, I know what you mean! I almost thanked you initially for just being so civilized with your comment!
How I see the animal/consent issue is that even though animals grow up and can have sex with each other, we must always remember our position of privilege and power over them. All sexual consent laws in North America state that consent cannot be given if it's an abuse of power (this is why hospital staff can't have sex with adult humans who are brain-injured, for example ...
MilesMany 4 months ago
@KDMatt (2/3) Actually, they can't have sex with ANY patients, period, for this same "abuse of power" reason).
Essentially, growing into sexual maturity or having hormones has nothing to do with consent. Because humans are in this position of power and privilege over animals, we have a responsiblity towards them to protect them from harm, which is where I draw the comparison to children.
MilesMany 4 months ago
@KDMatt (3/3) Another point here is that it is safe to assume that sex means something totally different and is experienced differently by other species. Humans (and possibly other primates) may have sex for pleasure, but does a horse, dog, or cat enjoy sex? Not by the looks of things. In any case, animals can't communicate this with us. Have you ever seen a horse initiate sex with a person? Me neither.
Again, thanks again for the smart discussion and your great manners! Cheers.
MilesMany 4 months ago
@MilesMany Bravo mate. The question though, are all cases of zoophilia necessarily abuses of power? Perhaps that's rhetorical, but I'm hard pressed to think that every single documented case was a one sided affair (no pun intended there). While certainly it is well known that only a handful of species on this planet go out of their way to have sex for pleasure, that doesn't preclude the possibility that other species (most notable, per your example, dogs and horses) can't still enjoy it (cont'd)
KDMatt 4 months ago
@KDMatt I think they are all abuses of power, yeah. When you say, "there is no way that the animal understands the implications..." that is exactly where the deal-breaker is for me. I can't get past it. I'm curious what you think though: you did refer to these folks as "deviants." Where does the ethical line occur for you? (Or maybe it's just the "gross factor" that draws the line for you? In which case I would say, FAIR ENOUGH. ;)
MilesMany 4 months ago
@MilesMany I try to restrain myself from having a gut reaction to things like this because I feel like it it a much more complex issue than just 'consent' or 'abuse of power.' As it stands, I think people are already, by and large pretty much okay with abusing their power over animals -- it happens every day, and nobody thinks twice about it! So for me, that's where that particular line of reasoning starts falling apart. I also feel, like I said, that animals are capable of enjoying sex -- (c)
KDMatt 4 months ago
@KDMatt I do agree that there's hypocrisy when people think it's okay to use animals for food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation, and then recoil at the thought of using them for sex. However, that gut reaction of "this is wrong!" about sex with animals is powerful data about our values.
I would hope it would wake us from a cultural anesthetic that keeps us unquestioning our usual use of animals, rather than to say, "Well I eat animals, maybe it's okay to have sex with them too."
MilesMany 4 months ago
@MilesMany Oh definitely. We're also a culture that condones euthanasia for sick animals, but not for sick people. If nothing else, it's fair to say we're not equals. --- For the record, I am a shameless meat eater, and enjoy keeping pets, so this is probably a big part of why we draw our respective lines in different places. Opinions are lovely. :)
KDMatt 4 months ago
@MilesMany -- and are capable of seeing physiological and psychological benefits. So when you accept that society is basically already okay with completely stripping animals of their power and consent, and consider that no harm is being done to the animal (that in fact they might be seeing measurable benefits), it's really a struggle for me to immediately label it as "wrong." However, that doesn't mean I feel like it's "right," either. I could imagine certain situations in which this sort of (c)
KDMatt 4 months ago
@MilesMany (c) practice could be 'acceptable' by these standards, but I also see the possibility of many other situations in which it violates these "ideals." If this subject were approached more as the consideration of intimate relations between humans and animals (as opposed to a human sexual fetish -- in which only people benefit), I think the conversation about it would be drastically different. However, I think that there are many zoophiles who, themselves, do not practice it under such (c)
KDMatt 4 months ago
@MilesMany (c) arrangements of mutual respect or love, which is, again, where their argument starts to fall apart. So yes, I do think under certain circumstances, we'd be remiss to deprive both partners of the experience, I'm also hardpressed to ignore that it probably most cases do not operate this way. In case you're curious, while I readily acknowledge that the animals in my life have latent sexual desires that I'm certain they want fulfilled, I'm not in any hurry to volunteer myself for it.
KDMatt 4 months ago
@KDMatt ... maybe what we need is to move towards fostering more civility towards our fellow species, rather than away from it by pondering whether we should be able to use animals for MORE than what we already do.
(Maybe it's a good time to mention that I realize you're not advocating sleeping with animals or anything. The discussion it just getting my fire burning! Thanks for listening. :)
MilesMany 4 months ago
@MilesMany (con'td) In fact there is a lot of evidence that suggests that they enjoy many of the same physiological benefits from sex that humans do (i.e. increased endorphines, elevated blood flow, expent calories, etc. etc.). If a zoophile were to argue that it was not just for his benefit, but for the animal's as well, based on this reasoning, I might be more inclined to give him/her some credence. Currently though, watching this documentary, it seems like a shallow, one-sided practice(cont'd
KDMatt 4 months ago
@MilesMany (cont'd) For that matter, there have been documented cases of people being approached by animals looking for a sexual encounter. However, the challenge to using this as an arguing point is that there is no way of knowing if the -animal- understands what the implications of that encounter would be. On the other hand though, it has been shown that some of these aforementioned species do masturbate from tiem to time. So perhaps it's possible for them to seek release afterall... Thoughts?
KDMatt 4 months ago
o_O well then.
PlatypusProdigy 4 months ago
Do we make a distinction between fcuking animals and being fckued by animals to put it crudely? The former would be abuse, the latter is just well... consenting. Lets get past our own personal revulsion here.
ElectraOnAzaleaPath 4 months ago
dogs love foreplay! i've fucking heard it all now.
alnjgove8uifjbkelbfg 5 months ago
Anyone who fucks animals should be thrown into fire. I view them as sub-human
TimeSmall 5 months ago 2
america is a scary place
CroMarduk 5 months ago
@CroMarduk
America? It's illegal here, dear.
SebastienCade 5 months ago
throwing up. in. my. mouth.
thefinewino 5 months ago
I would never eat dinner there. No amount of hand washing could cull the taste of horse jizz.
VianLaw 6 months ago
One of those guys sound like Seth Rogan.
Megafoxy 6 months ago
Very interesting but disturbing..
MicrowaveableTV 6 months ago
these guys are fucked
Mukamadboys 6 months ago
13 people are not horse fuckers.
100cjkennedy 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These poor animals. :(
MrLadyRaRa 7 months ago
Do I like because the documentary was well made or do I thumbs down for the grossness?
MrLadyRaRa 7 months ago 20
@MrLadyRaRa good question -__-
coolranchsoda 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dirty fucking yanks
AlinaAnn 8 months ago
I love that they always phrase it in terms of "the animal has NEEDS!"
Uh...no. You like sticking your dick in horses--let's just call it what it is. Lets not pretend that the horses of the world are just sitting around wishing and waiting for the day that these hideous motherfuckers would come nail them.
flameisbrighter 8 months ago 6
Basing my judgement on the length of most of these comments, you people just LOVE talking about this stuff. Even if you claim hatred toward these zoophiles, something inside of you is fascinated. Perhaps you, too, once fancied an animal sexually.
LastTaboo 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LastTaboo Your comment was too long, didn't read
Klonzepam 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Respond to this video... characters remaining
Cancel or Post
or Create a video response
Update automatically
Disable automatic updates * When ever you have ever hit rock bottom in your life and you feel depressed and so alone... always remember folks... Things could ALWAYS be worse... "At least I'm not fucking a horse"
KJA218 9 months ago
@Trolozaur Are you supplementing the word dog for Jewish woman?
nomorenigsplease 10 months ago
I think I saw Sarah Jessica Parker!
n1gdawg 10 months ago 16
@n1gdawg no, that was a real horse... :)
apifny 9 months ago
@n1gdawg no, that was a real horse... :)
apifny 9 months ago
I found it really easy to masturbate over this video. I'm going to link this video on my personal website that features me shoving beer bottles side ways into my anus then me squeezing it back out into another man's mouth.
nomorenigsplease 10 months ago
*no words*
Squishy876 10 months ago
i sear to go sum crakaz iz on sum other shit!!
nattynativekid17 10 months ago
Hahahaha omg this is fascinating.
nicklikestubey 10 months ago
I AM SO APPALLED. THIS IS SOOO REPULSIVE AND DISGUSTING!
mustang4010 10 months ago 5
This videos need better tags >_>
DogsneedpIeasuretoo 1 year ago
Love exists in all things.
innHD 1 year ago
That's just sick!! these people are sick!! it's still funny as fuck. Having sex with an animal is immoral and wrong. They are a laughing stock.
comecorrect1 1 year ago
they're cat calling the horses, lol
jac6995 1 year ago
sick crackkaz
grandwiz23 1 year ago
Everything about this is horrifying.
marcus3379 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo ...as paedophiles - whatever the scientific/theological/moralistic reason behind that may be.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo ...the power they have over them, nor have the desire to take advantage of them. Children tend to love & trust their parents no matter what, in the same way that animals form emotional bonds to their owners. I hope you don't think that I'm insulting. Because although I disagree with your actions and viewpoints, I am interested in your point of view on the subject & it's not my desire to insult you. Like I said, for whatever reason I don't think zoophiles are as abhorrent...
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo ...be trying to understand their way of thinking and countering it with my own) but I do see animals a little like children, before they are taught the morals and standards of average society, are sexually open (without knowing the finer details about it). Children see no problems with walking around naked and, without trying to sound too Freudian, flirting with their parents and other adults. But most adults will have the morals and constraints to not take advantage of...
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo The last replies were from a friend of mine (@meh29). I just wanted to add another opinion to the mix. I cannot show you evidence that animals can't consent because I have never tried to engage in sexual contact with an animal. I just know that animals are considered below human intelligence. I don't mean to keep comparing zoophilia with paedophilia since I truly don't believe they are in the same league (if it were a paedophile I was talking to here, I would in no means...
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo Animals cannot consent either. It is an abuse of a position of power over a being that lacks the faculties to understand the power relationship that is being abused, just as a child or vunerable adult does. I don't know how you can possibly stomach taking advantage of someone like that. It's like raping an unconscious person. There is simply no capacity to give consent.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo Incest, sex with children and sex with animals are wrong and abhorrent for the same reason - power dynamics. Gay sex is not wrong because gay people have sex with other consenting adult humans with no underlying unbalanced power dynamic. Incest and paedophilia is wrong because people/children trust people in their family/their elders - incest and paedophilia takes advantage of this trust to abuse.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo Incest, sex with children and sex with animals are wrong and abhorrent for the same reason - power dynamics. Gay sex is not wrong because gay people have sex with other consenting adult humans with no underlying unbalanced power dynamic. Incest and paedophilia is wrong because people/children trust people in their family/their elders - incest and paedophilia takes advantage of this trust to abuse.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@CopafaceBabyFirefly - That being said, WHY does it make people feel sick? That feeling is a result of the societal constraints on behavior. You haven't yet answered the why. Rape is another subject all together. @dogsneedpleasuretoo - I think you're coming up with situations just to prove your point. I also don't agree that " an open zoosexual so people get used to us and learn about us." That's not a positive thing to be telling people.
mayamorphine 1 year ago
@mayamorphine I'm no scientist or theologian. I just feel that taboos are there for a reason. In the same way that humans use laws in an attempt to stop bad things happenings, morals and things that the majority find unthinkable are there in attempt to stop what we see as bad things from happening. I'm not trying to class murder or paedophilia in the same league as zoophilia but maybe they're all seen as wrong for good reasons.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@mayamorphine Where those good reasons originated from psychologically and in an evolutional context, I have no idea. As I've said, I don't think I'm qualified or learned enough to form real opinions on that. I just think it was a necessary part of human evolution: to decide what is good and what isn't and form taboos to go against the 'bad'.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@blondecat666 - I haven't actually answered it. There are many sexual acts that are socially acceptable in one culture or another that do not produce offspring. Anal intercourse, fellatio, cunnilingus, etc. @CopafaceBabyFirefly and @dogsneedpleasuretoo I'm really glad that this conversation is actually happening. It's good to see other logical people, regardless of background or opinion.
mayamorphine 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo For the record, I'm not against homosexuality. Because homosexual relations are between consenting adult humans. And I don't see anything wrong with that.
As to your earlier comment, I don't believe that animals can give consent. Then again, I wouldn't know.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo I'm never going to think that sex with animals or incest is okay. In that reply, it appeared that you said incest is okay as long as it doesn't involve reproduction and I'm assuming your thoughts on sex with animals is the same. I honestly think taboos are there for a reason and I think animals are a little too different from humans in their activities. I hope I don't come across mean or judgemental but this is just what I, and the majority of others, think.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@Dogsneedpleasuretoo It goes against nature. And like I replied to someone else, I've read that for many animals, rape is the common reproduction method. (Although I can't be held to that as a fact because I'm not sure if it's true, I just read it somewhere). Animals are just too different from us for it to be right. If you'e turning to animals for love/pleasure then I think there is definitely something wrong with yo.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@CopafaceBabyFirefly If it goes against nature, then how does it end up happening? I think that if sex with animals defies nature, it doesn't defy nature as much as airplanes do. An aluminum tube that flies in the sky, propelled by fuel-burning engines, carrying people thousands of miles to places they would never go otherwise. Is defying nature (whatever that means) enough to make something wrong?
qwexas 11 months ago
@qwexas
How does an airplane defy nature? An airplane uses physics and can be explained by science as to how and why flight is possible...it no more defies nature than a plastic blag carried in the air by the wind. Now this stuff, these people have some serious psychological issues.
MaxamillianArturo 11 months ago
@MaxamillianArturo They may have psychological issues, but how do they defy nature? What is nature, and how can it be defied? If it really is possible to defy nature (is it?), then is it necessarily bad to defy nature? I don't actually believe airplanes defy nature. The only things that can defy nature (in my understanding of nature) are miracles and the supernatural, which aren't necessarily bad or possible.
qwexas 11 months ago
@qwexas Perhaps it doesn't defy nature but it certainly defies logic.
MaxamillianArturo 11 months ago
@MaxamillianArturo How so? What "logic" does it defy? Might it be the logical decision for some people but not others? I see logic as choosing the best means to an end, but I'm not entirely convinced that the ends themselves can be chosen logically. If I see something and ask "why?", then likewise question the explanation, and keep questioning what comes next, eventually I find something that doesn't seem logical. Most people use "logical" to mean "agrees with me".
qwexas 11 months ago
@qwexas Its illogical and unnatural because the purpose of copulation is for the propogation of ones own species. In this instance such a thing is impossible because it is impossible for different species to mate successfully.
MaxamillianArturo 11 months ago
@MaxamillianArturo If sex is for propagating the species (says who?), then it's illogical & unnatural for post-menopausal women to have sex, since they are no longer able to conceive. Most of the sex people engage in would be unnatural and/or illogical because conception is not intended, condoms often used, people not ready for children. Do you think aging women should not have sex? Do you think that what is natural is always the same as what is logical?
qwexas 11 months ago
@qwexas Says evolution.
MaxamillianArturo 11 months ago
@MaxamillianArturo Then why have bestiality & homosexuality not been bred out? What about all the non-sexual counterproductive behaviors, like using drugs? You make it sound like evolution has a plan, like it's a conscious being, rather than something random.
You didn't answer all my questions.
What do you think of women past menopause having sex?
Is what is logic always what is natural, and is either always what is right?
qwexas 11 months ago
@qwexas Well, women having sex past menopause is their perogative I suppose but definitely messed up seeing as how when gravity takes its toll its kind of an unpleasant sight to think of people from that age and on coppulating but simply because people age this does not take away from the fact that people are sexual beings or have sexual urges.
Homosexuality nad bestaility have not been bred out because the genes which make them possible persist regardless of if these people repoduce or not.
MaxamillianArturo 11 months ago
@MaxamillianArturo Well, some people have urges to do things that don't seem logical. If the purpose of sex is propagation, what is the purpose of our offspring? Is it logical for us to bring another generation of our species into this world?
I suspect you're reasoning backward from a conclusion; deciding it's wrong first, then looking to nature & logic for support. Try starting with the question "is it wrong?", then looking for an answer, without prejudice.
qwexas 11 months ago
@qwexas Essentially yes, we propogate to make more of us who will propogate...this is the way of evolution.
MaxamillianArturo 11 months ago
@MaxamillianArturo If we're here to reproduce, and our offspring will be here to reproduce, then the consequence of not reproducing is that there is no next generation. So what? Are they necessary? Does it matter if we don't breed with humans? Does it matter what we do with sexual beings of other species? The world's population is huge & growing exponentially, so it's logical to stop some people from reproducing or we all suffer crowding. Google this phrase: Voluntary Human Extinction Movement.
qwexas 11 months ago
@MaxamillianArturo Is it logical / natural for you to be here online watching this video & arguing about bestiality? Does this keep you alive? Does it help you breed? Please tell me what makes your current behavior natural & logical; otherwise, you & I might be engaging in an unnatural, illogical behavior right now, not so different from bestiality.
qwexas 11 months ago
@qwexas Building and functioning an aeroplane is a development in human intelligence. Having sex with animals is an abnormality in human sexual behaviour. People don't get outraged at the thought of an aeroplane but they do at the thought of a man having sexual relations with a horse.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 10 months ago
@CopafaceBabyFirefly Most people in modern times don't get outraged by planes, but if you showed one to a medieval person, he would think it was witchcraft. Actually, some people are terrified of flying. Vegetarians, especially vegans, may be outraged by meat. There is no unified opinion of "people". Some people are not outraged by bestiality. Some people are outraged over things other people are not. You speak of "people" too generally. Intelligence is abnormal, most folks can't design planes.
qwexas 10 months ago
Notice, I'm not arguing that this is OK, just that everyone's preconceptions of these kinds of phenomenon need to be re-evaluated to ascertain their source. Simply scapegoating by calling this 'wrong' and saying these people "need to be taken out back for a bullet buffet" is neither productive nor positive in a larger view. If it really is a problem, understand it first, and figure out a way to treat it. Less hate, more temperance, and yes, even love.
mayamorphine 1 year ago
@CopafaceBabyFirefly As an anthropologist, I have to ask a bigger question than the answer you're proposing-and that question is WHY interspecies sexual relations are considered wrong in society. At its core, the 'wrongness' of zoophilia is no different than a child learning it's not acceptable to be naked in public. The taboo a societally created value that encourages the reproduction of our own species, and, I argue, the denial of pleasure, however strange.
mayamorphine 1 year ago 2
@mayamorphine You have actually answered your own question, zoophilia (or other paraphilias) are considered 'wrong' because it interferes with the reason that we, humans are engeging in sexual acts, which is primerily to have offsprings. So society made all paraphilias unaccepted or illegal, subconsciously. Not that I agree with any of the paraphilias :-)
blondecat666 1 year ago
@mayamorphine It's just one of those things. Like sex with children, sex with someone you're related to. You just don't do it. It happens, but it makes the majority feel sick. If it wasn't for the morals & rules of society, things like rape would be okay because 'sex is to reproduce & reproduction is necessary'. But we don't see it like that. Even though I've heard many animals' reproduction method is rape (don't hold me to that, I just read it somewhere). Animals are just too different.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
what the fuck! hahahahaha
chr15911 1 year ago
couldnt help but notice that theyre all ugly as fuck.
maddoggydizzle 1 year ago 35
they are seriously sick minded....
0516astrid 1 year ago 2
I think you both need to re-evaluate some of the opinions and feelings that these people have. How do either of you feel about homosexuality? Transgenderism? How is this any more different than that?
mayamorphine 1 year ago
@mayamorphine
It's interspecies.
DontTouchMyVicodin 1 year ago
@mayamorphine Maybe because animals are not the same as a consenting adult humans. Homosexuality and transgenderism are different because it's still the same species.
CopafaceBabyFirefly 1 year ago
@mayamorphine Because homesexuals etc.are able to give INFORMED CONSENT to sexual acts. Zoophiles (like paedophiles) take advantage of the weaker partner who has little or no understanding of the act itself and animals like scared kids dont talk. That's one of the reasons that both are illegal. Im unsure why you even mentioned homosexuals etc.. You're trying to make a point but the comparison doesn't make any sense. Maybe you need to re-evaluate your opinions and feelings as theyre a bit skewed
Mugabe69 3 months ago
@Mugabe69 All humans are paedophiles. That is because all of us like sex, and all of us like gazing at ogling, and cooing over cute baby animal pictures, and surprise they are naked as the day they were born with no man made covering. Humans with the evil in them will attempt to make one man that dies worse than another man that dies.
kobidobidog 3 months ago
@kobidobidog Once again, that is a perfect example of the skewed kind of reasoning that a paedophile will use to justify their abhorrent actions. Your argument lacks even a basic coherrence and logic. Please don't think that I'm accusing you of being a child abuser, just highlighting the comparison.......
Mugabe69 3 months ago
@Mugabe69 Condemning is stone throwing, correct? Jesus who is perfect did not throw a stone correct? Want to be like Jesus ius don't throw a stone at the human called a Pedo. Do you know what condemn, and be condemned means?
kobidobidog 3 months ago
@kobidobidog........A child abuser, much as an animal abuser, will try to build an ethos and vainly scrabble for justification that what they do is 'natural' or 'right'. The plain truth is far simpler, some people are sexually aroused by children or animals, some of these people enjoy the degredation of their subjects, others believe that they are 'loving and caring' but all of them, without exception are damaged individuals and their actions are indisputably WRONG.
Mugabe69 3 months ago
Comment removed
kobidobidog 3 months ago
Comment removed
kobidobidog 3 months ago
fucking sick fucks need to be taken out back for a bullet buffet
MauserK43 1 year ago
@MauserK43 couldn't agree more!
suspensiondude 1 year ago