Malcome Bricklin did a car that looks like that ( I said "look" , not same technology ) from 1974 until early 1976 in St-John , New Brunswick, Canada. Later, Delorean tried also built a similar shape car ( 1981-82 ). The Bricklin factory was not able to produce vehicles fast enough to make a profit. As a result, only 2854 cars were built before the company went into receivership, owing the New Brunswick government $23 million.
Any rotary fan knows about NSU, and it being the originator of the production rotary engine. That comment shows you are not knowledgeable, your question would be tantamount to asking a Texan about Texas past as former Mexican land. Don't you think most, if not all texans know that fact? Instead of sounding inteligent, you sound ponpously and daringly ignorant. Mazda is not pulling away from rotaries. Already in Europe, rotaries are the first nitrogen production vehicles in the market.
@jaimecidcampeador wow...nitrogen production vehicles...just gonna let that one percolate for a bit, you pseudo intellectual fuck of a fan boy. Proving once again, that to be a rotary fan, you have to suffer some kind of traumatic brain injury. I'll leave it at this: if you're beloved whirlygigs are the best choice for an internal combustion powerplant, why'd they never make it to more cars, hmmm? YEs, a test fleet of hydrogen powered rolling pr agencies truly spells salvation for the rotary...
@jaimecidcampeador oh yeah, never mind that it nearly bankrupted them before, or the fact that to this day, they continue to be inefficient (ever seen what an rx 8 gets for MPG, or the fanboy fave the fd rx-7? It ain't pretty), unreliable (when compared to comparable conventionial engines), and sound like blenders.
@25tab Another hatemonger talking through his rear end. I can appreciate the good in many things, including both rotary and piston engines. On the other hand, little minds like you express uncalled for loyalty to an imaginary master, in this case, your master the piston engine. W/o knowing anything about rotary engines, you talk rubbish, only to show others that the only rubbish is you and your boorish mind.
@jaimecidcampeador spoken as only a rotary apologist can...did you even bother to check the history of the rotary engine? Ever hear of a little company called NSU, and what it did for them? ever notice how mazda is shifting production away from rotaries? Come back when you have something to contribute besides puffery, yeah?
I had three rotary engine Mazda's in my day. They had their problems. However, I was extremely satisfied with the results in the early 1970's. Off the line, I routinely fell BMW 1600s, Porche 356, 912s and 914s all the time. Oh, my initial cash outlay for my first Wankel car was $1900 dollars. For that, I could beat 4 cylinder cars of so much greater value it was crazy. Power to weigh ratio for the time was astounding. Gas mileage was zip, but we had plenty of gas and I laid plenty of rubber.
@jaimecidcampeador Had three rotary engine Mazda's in my day. They had some bugs, but I was extremely satisfied with the results in the early 1970's. Off the line, BMW 1600s, Porche 912s and 914s fell time and time again. Oh, my initial cash outlay for my first Wankel car was $1900 dollars. For that, I could beat 4 cylinder cars of so much greater value it was crazy. Power to weigh ratio for the time was astounding. Gas mileage was zip, but we had plenty of gas and I laid plenty of rubber.
@macitoneto : They never produced it ; these car were used first to test the Wankel Engine and then, the Diesel Engine for speed and endurance. :o) ( After a lot of testing, they drop the idea of putting Wankel in Mercedes )
Are you kidding, those c-111's weren't normal vehicles. Those are more powerfull than Dodge Vipers. Heck, even the Diesel at (23 seconds) C-111 was extremely powerfull. Both the gas and diesel c-111 was capable of going 200-250MPH!
Pěkný video. Jó C111, to je stroj. je škoda, že nakonec nedošlok její sériové výrobě. Na světě je jenom několik málo kusů. Wankelové motory. Docela bych se chtěl svézt autíčkem Mercedes-Benz C111 z roku 1969.
Malcome Bricklin did a car that looks like that ( I said "look" , not same technology ) from 1974 until early 1976 in St-John , New Brunswick, Canada. Later, Delorean tried also built a similar shape car ( 1981-82 ). The Bricklin factory was not able to produce vehicles fast enough to make a profit. As a result, only 2854 cars were built before the company went into receivership, owing the New Brunswick government $23 million.
unimogman404 2 months ago
Comment removed
StellarBlue1 2 months ago
Any rotary fan knows about NSU, and it being the originator of the production rotary engine. That comment shows you are not knowledgeable, your question would be tantamount to asking a Texan about Texas past as former Mexican land. Don't you think most, if not all texans know that fact? Instead of sounding inteligent, you sound ponpously and daringly ignorant. Mazda is not pulling away from rotaries. Already in Europe, rotaries are the first nitrogen production vehicles in the market.
jaimecidcampeador 1 year ago
@jaimecidcampeador wow...nitrogen production vehicles...just gonna let that one percolate for a bit, you pseudo intellectual fuck of a fan boy. Proving once again, that to be a rotary fan, you have to suffer some kind of traumatic brain injury. I'll leave it at this: if you're beloved whirlygigs are the best choice for an internal combustion powerplant, why'd they never make it to more cars, hmmm? YEs, a test fleet of hydrogen powered rolling pr agencies truly spells salvation for the rotary...
25tab 1 year ago
This song is RMX of prodigy Smack my bich up... Amazing cars...
TheMarkoni007 1 year ago
what's the name of the song??? i love it :)
nice vid!
zsidub 1 year ago
@zsidub Its called SMDU by Brock Landars
AAmatt777 8 months ago
What happened to it?
jakazza 1 year ago
It's the same platfrom as the 412 fastback.
I wasn't fooled !
seapeddler 1 year ago
This MB is awesome. It is a rotary engine ( Wankel ) like the Mazda RX7; RX8 cars. Hope MB develops its rotary engine division soon!!!!
jaimecidcampeador 1 year ago
@jaimecidcampeador oh yeah, never mind that it nearly bankrupted them before, or the fact that to this day, they continue to be inefficient (ever seen what an rx 8 gets for MPG, or the fanboy fave the fd rx-7? It ain't pretty), unreliable (when compared to comparable conventionial engines), and sound like blenders.
25tab 1 year ago
@25tab Another hatemonger talking through his rear end. I can appreciate the good in many things, including both rotary and piston engines. On the other hand, little minds like you express uncalled for loyalty to an imaginary master, in this case, your master the piston engine. W/o knowing anything about rotary engines, you talk rubbish, only to show others that the only rubbish is you and your boorish mind.
jaimecidcampeador 1 year ago
@jaimecidcampeador spoken as only a rotary apologist can...did you even bother to check the history of the rotary engine? Ever hear of a little company called NSU, and what it did for them? ever notice how mazda is shifting production away from rotaries? Come back when you have something to contribute besides puffery, yeah?
25tab 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I had three rotary engine Mazda's in my day. They had their problems. However, I was extremely satisfied with the results in the early 1970's. Off the line, I routinely fell BMW 1600s, Porche 356, 912s and 914s all the time. Oh, my initial cash outlay for my first Wankel car was $1900 dollars. For that, I could beat 4 cylinder cars of so much greater value it was crazy. Power to weigh ratio for the time was astounding. Gas mileage was zip, but we had plenty of gas and I laid plenty of rubber.
StellarBlue1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaimecidcampeador Had three rotary engine Mazda's in my day. They had some bugs, but I was extremely satisfied with the results in the early 1970's. Off the line, BMW 1600s, Porche 912s and 914s fell time and time again. Oh, my initial cash outlay for my first Wankel car was $1900 dollars. For that, I could beat 4 cylinder cars of so much greater value it was crazy. Power to weigh ratio for the time was astounding. Gas mileage was zip, but we had plenty of gas and I laid plenty of rubber.
StellarBlue1 2 months ago
Never seen this car. Sure is beautiful though, they should produce this cars again.
macitoneto 1 year ago
@macitoneto : They never produced it ; these car were used first to test the Wankel Engine and then, the Diesel Engine for speed and endurance. :o) ( After a lot of testing, they drop the idea of putting Wankel in Mercedes )
unimogman404 2 months ago
@macitoneto : Ho ! And they also tested the big V8 engine ! It was more of a laboratory car.
unimogman404 2 months ago
The interior looks worse than my 1987 s12.
ORUPRANKSTAZ 2 years ago
@ORUPRANKSTAZ
hence the year 1969.
blasfemi08 2 years ago
0.20 CW tahts perfeckt
fruion 2 years ago
Πολύ μπροστά πάντα σε όλα..!!!! Mercedes Benz the best company..!!!!!
tservasi 2 years ago
Chelle011 you re right it's nice cars but they cars arent in Turkey :((((
korsandjTR 2 years ago
1:10 :( why dont they make it today?! I like this styling much more than todays plastic looks...
Chelle011 2 years ago
Are you kidding, those c-111's weren't normal vehicles. Those are more powerfull than Dodge Vipers. Heck, even the Diesel at (23 seconds) C-111 was extremely powerfull. Both the gas and diesel c-111 was capable of going 200-250MPH!
celloprof 2 years ago
Experimental Rotary and 180mph... NICE.!!!
sliperjepun 2 years ago
never seen this car before. i like. i like.
natepresents 2 years ago
Pěkný video. Jó C111, to je stroj. je škoda, že nakonec nedošlok její sériové výrobě. Na světě je jenom několik málo kusů. Wankelové motory. Docela bych se chtěl svézt autíčkem Mercedes-Benz C111 z roku 1969.
GeoJirka2 3 years ago
Wish DB had put them into production.
wsmith68 3 years ago
nice vid :D
pashasirait 3 years ago