Added: 3 years ago
From: Delta12cr
Views: 61,378
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5,461)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • There's no proof in that planning isn't better than a random "market." The logistics of moving a group of people into an area, for say an expedition into the rain Forrest or moving troops into an area, then setting up camp, gathering resources, and the "planning" in the use of those resources works perfectly fine. capitalist "logistics" are very selfish, elitist, impractical, unscientific and most of all inhumane. "human nature," "competition," etc are simply ideological excuses for plutocracy

  • ALL value comes from labor, if you don't believe that then tell me where do buildings, roads, cars and houses come from? do you see the rich man out there with sweat on his back, no you don't. and the materials, where do they come from? there's no rich man out there with a chain saw on ax men. the rich harvest from us as though we are a crop and they are the farmer. well, i say REMIND THEM WE ARE HUMAN and they better put up or shut up, as we are the INDENTURED PROVIDERS

  • @johnniefive80, People who labor stupidly don't make any money because there is no market for what they do.

  • Comment removed

  • Socialist economics requires central economic planning, and centralized planning inevitably leads toward communist totalitarianism wherein no private property is allowed. The central planning authority has to have powers that impact and ultimately control social life because the knowledge required for centrally planning an economy is inherently decentralized. Such knowledge thus needs to be brought under the central planning committee's control. That, is what the leftists refuse to admit.

  • For if you do not agree with the Marxist Doctrine, you are deemed not to be on the side of progress. The term of distinction reserved for those who have not been visited by the new revelation is the word 'Reactionary'. Literally, the inference is that you are working against progress, in a backward direction. - Bertrand Russell

  • Each individual is different and has their own sometimes if not often contradictory desires. Some people want a lot of material things which require a lot of hard work while others do not. Socialism is particularly blind in that regard because it is materialistic and assumes everyone is equally motivated to have the same material things. Capitalism allows individualities in that regard. It allows people to work proportionately in order to have whatever lifestyle they wish.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • the only way a worker's labor is profitable is if the worker is underpaid, period. therefore, all workers are underpaid or under compensated. we then are sold products and services at a profit, that means those commodities are sold to us at above their actual value. this is systematic impoverishment, this is capitalism.

  • government is not only the last vestige of our rights, it is the only vestige of our rights. it is continually under siege by the interests of profit (capitalism) to force inhuman practices of wage slavery and plutocratic ideology. capitalism is incompatible with democracy. how democratic is your work place? do the opulent listen to what the people want? they are perfectly content with enjoying what the workers provide. their "prosperity" is born on the backs of the uncompensated workers.

  • law and government has it's place, it is needed. government is a development more modern than a feudal governance by royalty. a democratic government strives to give all citizens a voice in the decision making process. under capitalism, all society's decisions are more and more controlled by the opulent; as we live under a plutocracy. a plutocracy is not democratic, it is not human-centric and treats the majority of humans as cattle.

  • The lutz of the left is as done in figure skating. Leftism is based on convoluted theories ignoring the fact that human nature is not basically good. Like a moral Ponzi scheme, leftists try to take from those who have by virtue of hard work to give to those who have not, in order to get control of society without ever first changing the degraded aspects of their own nature. When the left takes over and the bigger the Government, The less people matter as individuals or are even needed.

  • Comment removed