The problem with what he is saying is that "force" (Gewalt) is different according to how it is used and who is using it. It cannot be characterized as a l w a y s bad per se. A strong correlation can be drawn between anarchism and laissez faire capitalism both of which are flawed ideologies.
@ejgiv True, the use of force is not ALWAYS bad. For example in SELF DEFENCE if force is used on you first however the government uses force preemptively and deliberately.
The state's interference in black neighborhoods further isolates them from the rest of society. In many municipalities, these are the areas concentrated on by the police. It is predatory to say the least, in order to sustain the prison industrial complex.
Hey Stephen just a quick heads up. There is likely a Bisphenol-A lining in that can you just drank out of. The side effects of this chemical are worthy of researching. It's also known as BPA.
my ideal system is called demanarchy, it's a mix between democracy and anarchy, there is no government, instead every individual votes for want they to happen on every issue as they occur.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I think it's time he STFU on his ideas of "peaceful anarchy." I've lived under a government that was so corrupt that it didn't exist at all. People spent years in jail waiting for a trial that never happened, some peoples opinions were regarded as fact no matter what, and there were countless crimes that were committed but nobody ever wanted to talk about. You DO NOT want to live like that. NOBODY does. My partner lived there only SIX MONTHs, and said, "NEVER AGAIN!" Government rocks.
Until the Nazi regime becomes corrupt, then you"ll have an interesting and healthy debate with your family and friends about whether "NO GOVERNMENT AT ALL" has any plausibilty.
So The government did all this but you still want it. The government was able to do all this corrupted act just by poeple claiming its legit more then not its existence. Dude look at what you are saying before vomiting this none sens.
it's true. there's a lot of communists that call themselves "anarchists". what's the problem with these people? communists are really the most stupid people out there.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If Stef supports none violence, which is good, I would like to see how he approaches race as it has been shown some races or more prone to violence than others. Can all races truly live in a "none violent" enviorment? Dont ignore human nature for a fictious ideal either.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I do too, and I dont think race is just skin color; it's more behavior. And violence is a behavior, and some races are more prone to violence than others i.e., they are more prone to that behavior. Of crouse we are only speaking in generalities ;)
The point of the non-aggression principle is not the idealistic hope that all human beings will adopt it and behave perfectly according to it, only that those who have can properly identify what kinds of actions are and are not moral and justifiable. The point is only that: if some people are prone to use aggression as a means to an end, is it acceptable for others to do so as well? In other words, can we point guns at people to force them to give us what we want because others may also do that.
"it has been shown some races or more prone to violence" Could you point to some studies on this? Has it been clearly demonstrated that race itself was the cause, and not external factors like, say, government policies or discrimination?
"Dont ignore human nature for a fictious ideal either. " Again, do you have any studies that indicate violence is innate as opposed to caused by external factors like, say, parenting strategies, or lack there of?
I don't see how any race could be more violent then the other...I am no scientist, but if it is not hereditary, then these behaviors are based on that races environment... no? The argument is through empirical and logical thinking.. anyone has the potential to be intelligent regardless of race. This is way Stef and others have critical views on things that indoctrinate children whether it is the state..schools.. or the church.. or the family.
Another pseudoscietist / white nationalist I presume? White poeples killed more people then any races combine. They are just very good convincing others they aren`t.
yes, humans are also tend to believe in lot of crazy nonsense, even those in scientific community. But that doesn't mean science doesn't work, or humans can not interact with each other peacfully.
A human can be violent and a hammer can be used for smashing skulls.. does not mean that is the nature of hammers or humans.
Violence is a tool, that humans use like all other tools. Aside from psychopaths, human beings are not fundamentally violent, but they understand that violence can be used.
Stef does acknowledge that much.. but to assume that violence is the nature of human beings is to say all humans are psychopaths.
Totally disagree. When you walk down the street do you think everyone you see wants to harm you? Come on now. This is a lie perpetrated by those who want to remain in power. Thus, we need them to protect us from each other. Again, a total lie.
Most people want to be left alone to live a good life. That's it.
Check out the video "The Century of Self." It describes how the elite use this lie to even convince themselves that we must be controlled. Don't believe it!
"The Century of Self." That was a good series, long as hell (4 hrs.) but captivating, thanks for the recommendation. I think that we are both; we all want a good life and want to be left alone but yet we can so easily kill one another. It would be nice if we could solve this paradox of the human condition and sometimes I'm optimistic that we can while at other times I don't give us the slightest chance in hell.
skip the first minute if you're not into gratuitous ass kissing
pretorious700 10 months ago
The problem with what he is saying is that "force" (Gewalt) is different according to how it is used and who is using it. It cannot be characterized as a l w a y s bad per se. A strong correlation can be drawn between anarchism and laissez faire capitalism both of which are flawed ideologies.
ejgiv 1 year ago
@ejgiv True, the use of force is not ALWAYS bad. For example in SELF DEFENCE if force is used on you first however the government uses force preemptively and deliberately.
grumpone 1 year ago
Talks with a German accent, but has a French name.
ejgiv 1 year ago
@ejgiv German accent??? Ever heard the German language or Germans talking in English?
grumpone 1 year ago
@grumpone I live in Germany and know exactly how they talk. This man's English is good but clearly a German accent!
ejgiv 1 year ago
@ejgiv
Stefan is from Canada. The host Hank Xavier is from the midwest USA
Bleedingedgehx 11 months ago
This was great. It's a shame oracle broadcasting has gone to shit lately.
p717 1 year ago
The state's interference in black neighborhoods further isolates them from the rest of society. In many municipalities, these are the areas concentrated on by the police. It is predatory to say the least, in order to sustain the prison industrial complex.
kmc56 2 years ago
lol this guy is gay? He doesnt sound gay, which I guess is prejudice on my part
OntologicalQuandary 2 years ago
lawl
atlasmediaonline 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You sound gay.
johnpdd 2 years ago
lol.
OntologicalQuandary 2 years ago 2
Hey Stephen just a quick heads up. There is likely a Bisphenol-A lining in that can you just drank out of. The side effects of this chemical are worthy of researching. It's also known as BPA.
JesseKantstopolis 2 years ago
Explain???
OntologicalQuandary 2 years ago
Thank you.
deadman12078 2 years ago
my ideal system is called demanarchy, it's a mix between democracy and anarchy, there is no government, instead every individual votes for want they to happen on every issue as they occur.
ScubaSctimpy 2 years ago
What about demonarchy? Rule by demons?
johnpdd 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think it's time he STFU on his ideas of "peaceful anarchy." I've lived under a government that was so corrupt that it didn't exist at all. People spent years in jail waiting for a trial that never happened, some peoples opinions were regarded as fact no matter what, and there were countless crimes that were committed but nobody ever wanted to talk about. You DO NOT want to live like that. NOBODY does. My partner lived there only SIX MONTHs, and said, "NEVER AGAIN!" Government rocks.
LeksServices 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Believe it or not, I would say that being a Jew under an UNCORRUPTED NAZI REGIME is better than NO GOVERNMENT AT ALL!
LeksServices 2 years ago
Until the Nazi regime becomes corrupt, then you"ll have an interesting and healthy debate with your family and friends about whether "NO GOVERNMENT AT ALL" has any plausibilty.
globbo100 2 years ago
Being enslaved, tortured and then killed is better than freedom?
Meh I choose freedom.
Mastikator 2 years ago 2
you are an idiot
OntologicalQuandary 2 years ago
Tell that to some Jewish anarchists who survived the Holocaust while you still can and see their reactions.
domaineer 2 years ago
So The government did all this but you still want it. The government was able to do all this corrupted act just by poeple claiming its legit more then not its existence. Dude look at what you are saying before vomiting this none sens.
Baabaloux 2 years ago
You do realize that it was a government that was keeping people in jail without a trial?
One thing governments are good at is actually preventing justice services.
I prefer the voluntary society rather than anarchy.
johnpdd 2 years ago
MC BS spitting some anarchism haha
DjEphixa 2 years ago
27:34 Hahahaha! xDDDDD
ikemkrueger 2 years ago
does anybody know the name of that "80's song" in 37:37 ??? Thanks in advane
MaikUniversum 2 years ago
Simple Minds - Don't You (Forget About Me), from the movie Breakfast Club
drewmandan 2 years ago
oh that's where I heard that song. Wonderful movie :) Thanks.
MaikUniversum 2 years ago
CS would have been all over this, defending the general definition of anarchism as violence. ... ;_;
tpsisokayiguess 2 years ago
it's true. there's a lot of communists that call themselves "anarchists". what's the problem with these people? communists are really the most stupid people out there.
1schwererziehbar1 2 years ago 6
Primative humans are prone to violence..... intellectual humans are prone to think first
andrewh817 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If Stef supports none violence, which is good, I would like to see how he approaches race as it has been shown some races or more prone to violence than others. Can all races truly live in a "none violent" enviorment? Dont ignore human nature for a fictious ideal either.
MrHappy702 2 years ago
i think all humans are prone to violence, not just certain skin colour
Jangaboo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I do too, and I dont think race is just skin color; it's more behavior. And violence is a behavior, and some races are more prone to violence than others i.e., they are more prone to that behavior. Of crouse we are only speaking in generalities ;)
MrHappy702 2 years ago
The point of the non-aggression principle is not the idealistic hope that all human beings will adopt it and behave perfectly according to it, only that those who have can properly identify what kinds of actions are and are not moral and justifiable. The point is only that: if some people are prone to use aggression as a means to an end, is it acceptable for others to do so as well? In other words, can we point guns at people to force them to give us what we want because others may also do that.
Nphyx 2 years ago 4
"it has been shown some races or more prone to violence" Could you point to some studies on this? Has it been clearly demonstrated that race itself was the cause, and not external factors like, say, government policies or discrimination?
"Dont ignore human nature for a fictious ideal either. " Again, do you have any studies that indicate violence is innate as opposed to caused by external factors like, say, parenting strategies, or lack there of?
sumadartsan 2 years ago 3
I don't see how any race could be more violent then the other...I am no scientist, but if it is not hereditary, then these behaviors are based on that races environment... no? The argument is through empirical and logical thinking.. anyone has the potential to be intelligent regardless of race. This is way Stef and others have critical views on things that indoctrinate children whether it is the state..schools.. or the church.. or the family.
chrisdonahue 2 years ago
which races would that be?
77GSlinger 2 years ago
ummm.....arms race? Now that is a race prone to violence.
utubehayter 2 years ago
Ah tooshay olay!
77GSlinger 2 years ago
Another pseudoscietist / white nationalist I presume? White poeples killed more people then any races combine. They are just very good convincing others they aren`t.
Baabaloux 2 years ago
Whee, what a fun listen!
I have a few suggestions for single titles if you're going to start recording as MC Big S or BCF.
"Hope Ya Doin' Well"
"Whoop, There It Is (The Gun in the Room)"
"Pink Unicorns"
"Baby Got Reason 'n Evidence"
"You Can Do It (Put Your Brain Into It)"
=D
ks100001 2 years ago 4
Someone should explain these people what social-anarchism actually is.
Rugob 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm with you Stef, i only wish that you include something like
"human can be and often is violent being"
in your set of First Principles.
You just can't build entire social system without basic facts about human behavior.
marjan15 2 years ago
yes, humans are also tend to believe in lot of crazy nonsense, even those in scientific community. But that doesn't mean science doesn't work, or humans can not interact with each other peacfully.
MaikUniversum 2 years ago 5
I'm fairly certain that Stef has never refuted or contradicted the assertion that humans can act violently.
bunabayashi 2 years ago 4
A human can be violent and a hammer can be used for smashing skulls.. does not mean that is the nature of hammers or humans.
Violence is a tool, that humans use like all other tools. Aside from psychopaths, human beings are not fundamentally violent, but they understand that violence can be used.
Stef does acknowledge that much.. but to assume that violence is the nature of human beings is to say all humans are psychopaths.
utubehayter 2 years ago 8
@utubehayter & THIN A CHOICE OF PSYCHOPATHS IS PRESENTED TO RULE
arphaxad1000 5 months ago
Totally disagree. When you walk down the street do you think everyone you see wants to harm you? Come on now. This is a lie perpetrated by those who want to remain in power. Thus, we need them to protect us from each other. Again, a total lie.
Most people want to be left alone to live a good life. That's it.
Check out the video "The Century of Self." It describes how the elite use this lie to even convince themselves that we must be controlled. Don't believe it!
newgtguy 2 years ago 4
"The Century of Self." That was a good series, long as hell (4 hrs.) but captivating, thanks for the recommendation. I think that we are both; we all want a good life and want to be left alone but yet we can so easily kill one another. It would be nice if we could solve this paradox of the human condition and sometimes I'm optimistic that we can while at other times I don't give us the slightest chance in hell.
notfitforsociety 2 years ago
I don't think I could ever bring myself to kill another. Only if my life or the life of a loved one is in grave danger.
newgtguy 2 years ago
Wow, i would never have thought to get so many thumbs down just for mentioning how i think First Principles could be expanded...
This kind of commenting reminds me of religion.
Most comments include straw man fallacies.
marjan15 2 years ago
You are actually funny as well as disgustingly intellegent.
FUZZYisBIG 2 years ago
I think those come hand-in-hand :)
chris3443 2 years ago