I wish I hadn't voted for him. Gay people have the right to do whatever they want. They can even say we got a marriage license, and got married at church, but it doesn't change the fact that their is no such thing as same sex marriage in the Word of God. The Lord condemns homosexuality. That's the way it is, and the marriage license cannot make it valid in the eyes of God. I expect to get a lot of thumbs downs, but that's ok. Sometimes, the truth hurts.
@psxwarrior The Defense of Marriage Act is blatantly unconstitutional. That's all that matters. It violates the full faith and credit clause--look it up.
I know it does. I have looked it up. I have my own copy of the Constitution. In fact, I have a copy of The Freedom Documents from Chuck Baldwin Live. Of course it violates the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution, but the Constitution is not above God's laws. I argued that they have a right to do whatever they want. Truth be told, the marriage license is unconstitutional. I don't want my marriage to be recognized in the same way as the gay guy across the street. cont. below...
My argument is to have the whole marriage license done away with, so that two gay guys can get married in a gay church and go home and have gay sex. My girlfriend can move in with me and we can tell everybody we are husband and wife. We can even write up a contract saying we will stay together forever as husband and wife. The difference in our two marriages is one is blessed by God, and the other is condemned by God.
He didn't just vote for it. He authored it and introduced it. I don't buy the sincerity of his flip-flop. I think he's still a religious social conservative.
Who cares if he is a local or state social conservative.....he is running for FEDERAL office and he is a FEDERAL Libertarian. He has been educated on the constitution more in the last 5 years than EVER in his life! Please don't knock people in the liberty movement! For years Barr has fought hard(with his own money) to correct the damage done while he was in office! He is the signal to the blind republicans and democrats that joining us is not crazy. The constitution is sound! Peace!
Youre right. This is why I decided not to vote for Hillary. I was SO eff'N tired of "I said this, but i meant that" "I did this, but had I known I would have done this instead" "After I did that, Had I realized I would have done this" "That was a very long time ago, but I've changed since" Bla bla bla... FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuullsh!ti
No kidding, his family has helped him understand the wrongs of the republican party and it has been amazing watch his transformation into a libertarian as many of my family and friends have done over the last four years!
He only states that he will work to repeal that part of DOMA that has been used as a club.
In the debate on the previous night, he states that the problem with DOMA is that it establishes a de facto federal definition of marriage, and that he aims to repeal that part of DOMA.
I mean no offense, and don't mean to be nit-picky, but as far as I can ascertain, the title to this video is incorrect.
We're aware of Barr's position up to his nomination speech, as we helped drive him in that direction! However, based on the video clip, Barr clearly calls for "repeal," as opposed to amendment (as he mentioned earlier). Outright Libertarians members on the convention floor spoke extensively with voting delegates, and it was the opinion of most Barr delegates we spoke with -- as well as our interpretation -- that Barr called for a full repeal of DOMA in his Sunday morning nominating speech.
So he is against his own law in cases where the law punishes lawbreakers?
Maybe I'm getting overly semantical, but somehow ex CIA lawyers who want to convince me that they are libertarian have a pretty high barrier to cross.
What a crock. Nothing at all about the rights of individuals, including gays. "Law-abiding" homosexual citizens cannot currently marry their chosen partners anywhere in the U.S., save MA. (Not in CA, no licenses are currently issued.) And various states are trying to violate gays' rights by passing legislation to refuse to recognize other states' marriages, just fine with "states rights" advocates Barr & Root.
How disgusting that the LP nominated this thug from the religious right.
I wish I hadn't voted for him. Gay people have the right to do whatever they want. They can even say we got a marriage license, and got married at church, but it doesn't change the fact that their is no such thing as same sex marriage in the Word of God. The Lord condemns homosexuality. That's the way it is, and the marriage license cannot make it valid in the eyes of God. I expect to get a lot of thumbs downs, but that's ok. Sometimes, the truth hurts.
psxwarrior 2 years ago
@psxwarrior The Defense of Marriage Act is blatantly unconstitutional. That's all that matters. It violates the full faith and credit clause--look it up.
Madfoot713 2 years ago
I know it does. I have looked it up. I have my own copy of the Constitution. In fact, I have a copy of The Freedom Documents from Chuck Baldwin Live. Of course it violates the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution, but the Constitution is not above God's laws. I argued that they have a right to do whatever they want. Truth be told, the marriage license is unconstitutional. I don't want my marriage to be recognized in the same way as the gay guy across the street. cont. below...
psxwarrior 2 years ago
My argument is to have the whole marriage license done away with, so that two gay guys can get married in a gay church and go home and have gay sex. My girlfriend can move in with me and we can tell everybody we are husband and wife. We can even write up a contract saying we will stay together forever as husband and wife. The difference in our two marriages is one is blessed by God, and the other is condemned by God.
psxwarrior 2 years ago
He didn't just vote for it. He authored it and introduced it. I don't buy the sincerity of his flip-flop. I think he's still a religious social conservative.
wcsxwcsx 3 years ago
Who cares if he is a local or state social conservative.....he is running for FEDERAL office and he is a FEDERAL Libertarian. He has been educated on the constitution more in the last 5 years than EVER in his life! Please don't knock people in the liberty movement! For years Barr has fought hard(with his own money) to correct the damage done while he was in office! He is the signal to the blind republicans and democrats that joining us is not crazy. The constitution is sound! Peace!
shanklinmike 3 years ago
LauraBeachnut 3 years ago
Bob Barr is significant because here's a guy who came from the wrong end of things and has seen the error of his ways -- cut the dude some slack....
PanDeism 3 years ago
watch?v=SzTozC3PCF4
shanklinmike 3 years ago
No kidding, his family has helped him understand the wrongs of the republican party and it has been amazing watch his transformation into a libertarian as many of my family and friends have done over the last four years!
shanklinmike 3 years ago
He never says he will work to repeal DOMA.
He only states that he will work to repeal that part of DOMA that has been used as a club.
In the debate on the previous night, he states that the problem with DOMA is that it establishes a de facto federal definition of marriage, and that he aims to repeal that part of DOMA.
I mean no offense, and don't mean to be nit-picky, but as far as I can ascertain, the title to this video is incorrect.
Respectfully,
Alex Peak
allixpeeke 3 years ago
We're aware of Barr's position up to his nomination speech, as we helped drive him in that direction! However, based on the video clip, Barr clearly calls for "repeal," as opposed to amendment (as he mentioned earlier). Outright Libertarians members on the convention floor spoke extensively with voting delegates, and it was the opinion of most Barr delegates we spoke with -- as well as our interpretation -- that Barr called for a full repeal of DOMA in his Sunday morning nominating speech.
OutrightUSAVideo 3 years ago
So he is against his own law in cases where the law punishes lawbreakers?
Maybe I'm getting overly semantical, but somehow ex CIA lawyers who want to convince me that they are libertarian have a pretty high barrier to cross.
sdkee 3 years ago
What a crock. Nothing at all about the rights of individuals, including gays. "Law-abiding" homosexual citizens cannot currently marry their chosen partners anywhere in the U.S., save MA. (Not in CA, no licenses are currently issued.) And various states are trying to violate gays' rights by passing legislation to refuse to recognize other states' marriages, just fine with "states rights" advocates Barr & Root.
How disgusting that the LP nominated this thug from the religious right.
ADebreu 3 years ago
I'm so glad we have this recorded...
jimcperry 3 years ago
I second that. Thanks for recording this and sharing it the public.
pnj101 3 years ago
Thanks for this video.
jeepndesert 3 years ago