Thanks. your advice helped! I only wish that 'Flight' is more computer friendly...this is crazy that they make a game that 90% of all people that own the game cant run it like it should.
god damn I've got.....9600 quad core 2.3, 8GB ram, my system Experience Index is 5.8. got SP2.... and getting average results (fps around 15-25 tweaked to around medium settings).... I'm not sure I like DX 10 all that much...progressive taxing doesn't work, and the concrete looks grainy. most downloaded planes don't work right...any suggestions? I've tweaked everything but taking away things I want to be able to run. please help!
@FastRedDragon21 If you want it fast, disable All AI trafic. It realy helps, disable Direct X 10, that will fix planes, and move the main settings to 75% it helps, i had 5-10 fps before and now I have 50-55 fps.
have you considered overclocking your cpu? I've got a 920 at 3.8GHz and fsx runs at 50-60 fps with out fraps. your system runs fine now but it could run better.
freak yea this game is like playing m w2 or bfbc2 or if your not a gameing type person... than its like fucking your girlfriend without a condom and whe will never get pregnant. ;)
so the processor I want is quad core i7 each at 1.6 GHz will that mean it will be overcloacked to 3.2 GHz? but it says that it runs at only at 2.8GHz what does the 1.6 GHz mean?
guys, offcourse your'e right: flaps set to 30 at 20.000 ft. landing gear. Butttt, don't forget that this movie is about the great performance of the computer. And not about the flight and mistakes..
Have you tried updating your drivers for the GTX295? I heard of someone who did and it had a dramatic increase in performance for FSX. Please let me know as I'm thinking of getting this card.
For all the people posting about how the GTX295 should give better performance - FSX is CPU dependent in terms of frame rate, while the graphic card mainly looks after resolution. This game is very badly optimized and peforms far worse with SLi graphics cards without good drivers.
a Intel 920 stock should be fine, it's naturally better then previous dual/quad cores at stock speeds. Even if it's only oc'd ( if it is) to 2.9, that should be plenty with the GTX 295. FSX doesn't require loads of CPU power to run it, it's more of a visual game.
not with the i7 cores, the gtx 295 was built with the intention to work exceedingly well with that type of core. Now if it was a regular dual/quad core you would be right.
I know what I'm talking about, you seem to have the assumption that just because the i7-920 has it's stock speed at 2.66, then it would give the same performance as a previous dual/quad core, but your wrong. The i7 may have the same frequency but they are much more powerful, it's like trying to compare AMD and Intel chips off their speeds, you can't do that since they are measured in different ways. The author of this video probably isn't using a i7 core, maybe just a dual or quad.
First off, it says in the description that it is on an i7. I know the architecture is different and it's 32nm process. Still, I've seen charts showing at what point the i7 processor chokes current video cards.
My guess is that you're theorizing your standpoint.
well I didn't see that, but you should have looked at it more carefully, he says it's clocked at 2.93, that's a i7 940, not a 920. His cpu should not be bottlenecking his gpu. There are many other parts that could do that, the mobo, the ram type, even the amount of power getting to the parts. It's hard to base our opinions on such restricted information about his entire system though.
Because this game is a CPU based game, not GPU, i play crysis maxed out, but i cant play fsx maxed out, in fact 9800gtx+ probably gets better performance in FSX over a gtx 295
NO you dont understand, the gtx 295 is probably 4x better than your 9800gtx+ however it is not good for the game FSX, it does not play FSX very well, DOES ANYONE UNDERSTAND WHAT IM SAYING,GTX 295 IS BAD FOR FSX,BUT IS GOOD FOR GAMES LIKE CRYSIS,GOD YOU KIDS ARE SO STUPID
yes lol i understand, and btw, im not a kid, and also you should do one thing, Get a 9800GTX+ a AMD Phenom 3.0GHz x4 overclock it to 3.30GHz x4 and then fucking play all the games.
why would i downgrade my computer to yours to play all games, i already play them all and you cant even play maxed out on half of them with your shitty ass 9800gtx
Your such an idiot, without a GPU the game wouldn't even start, neither would your computer and you wouldn't even be able to see anything on your computer, fucking brainless kids
hey buddy fsx is a cpu intesive game , well it needs a gpu to run it but cpu is the main requirment for fsx , and fsx does not support sli or crossfire
That little. Is that running with full screen mode? Without it Im sure you will get at least 50+ Just press alt+enter and then go to the top left of the screen till the diaganol arrow shows up and make the screen a little smaller and center it and you'll get gr8 performance.
Lucky! I'm runing fsx on a 9 year old laptop it said I need to upgrade to get acceleration
misterpspdude 8 months ago
i think u would get more fps if your install this game on a separate hard drive and oc your cpu
mboy3515 1 year ago
Thanks. your advice helped! I only wish that 'Flight' is more computer friendly...this is crazy that they make a game that 90% of all people that own the game cant run it like it should.
FastRedDragon21 1 year ago
1:47 lol OPEN COCKPIT! omg
DotCmaker01 1 year ago
god damn I've got.....9600 quad core 2.3, 8GB ram, my system Experience Index is 5.8. got SP2.... and getting average results (fps around 15-25 tweaked to around medium settings).... I'm not sure I like DX 10 all that much...progressive taxing doesn't work, and the concrete looks grainy. most downloaded planes don't work right...any suggestions? I've tweaked everything but taking away things I want to be able to run. please help!
FastRedDragon21 1 year ago
@FastRedDragon21 If you want it fast, disable All AI trafic. It realy helps, disable Direct X 10, that will fix planes, and move the main settings to 75% it helps, i had 5-10 fps before and now I have 50-55 fps.
SuperPiroManiac 1 year ago
are they swearing? cuz i think i heard fuck
omardude2 1 year ago
@123Mrvalter try alphashangar.co.nr
omardude2 1 year ago
When formation flying try to keep at 570mph i find it more control in the F-16s
MrDonkeydevil 1 year ago
do you play FSX with keyboard or a joystick ??
wassim407 1 year ago
have you considered overclocking your cpu? I've got a 920 at 3.8GHz and fsx runs at 50-60 fps with out fraps. your system runs fine now but it could run better.
flyboytgb 1 year ago
change to Win 7 Ultimate!! :D btw nice vid!! 5/5
9T6Q 1 year ago
thats fun
Ac3HD 1 year ago
that F22 is hot! whered you get it?
7A1R28 1 year ago
@7A1R28 if im not mistaken, i think its an f-18 hornet/super hornet.
onenutmonkey234 1 year ago
@onenutmonkey234 my mistake wrong video!
7A1R28 1 year ago
@7A1R28 its all good.
onenutmonkey234 1 year ago
haha did you speed up the music to avoid the copyright detector?
JohnBohnam223 1 year ago
wow my comp is better than yours and I have an i5 and a gts 250 graphics
acejakecool19982007 1 year ago
the other guy is flying with his canopy open ? xD lol
elvee88 1 year ago
I love my i5 and my gt 220 graphics it doesn't lag and the graphics are amazing :D
acejakecool19982007 1 year ago
@acejakecool19982007 do you play FSX?
SouthwestAirlines09 1 year ago
@SouthwestAirlines09 Yea
acejakecool19982007 1 year ago
@acejakecool19982007 Can you please make a video of your FSX settings
SouthwestAirlines09 1 year ago
@SouthwestAirlines09 I will try my best
acejakecool19982007 1 year ago
@SouthwestAirlines09 Hey I made a video of my graphics
acejakecool19982007 1 year ago
incredible graphics
jachoposs 1 year ago
good sound!!!
lostintas 1 year ago
niiiice landing
buldi53 1 year ago
nice vid
but this music sucks
JahPahZzZ 1 year ago
3:05 wat ....the fuck
xXxreallydontcarexXx 1 year ago
at :58 seconds i think daz kinda hard i all wayz mis the escort
xXxreallydontcarexXx 1 year ago
WTF! Did the airplane Fart at 0:10? XD
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
wtf.... to run crysis in a 30" monitor you need minimun a GTX 285 and overclok you processor @ 4.0
ferraripanama 2 years ago
this game rly fun??
amirul328 2 years ago
freak yea this game is like playing m w2 or bfbc2 or if your not a gameing type person... than its like fucking your girlfriend without a condom and whe will never get pregnant. ;)
GibsonSkater05 2 years ago
sorry man but it will lag...
BaMaNeLiTe 2 years ago
so the processor I want is quad core i7 each at 1.6 GHz will that mean it will be overcloacked to 3.2 GHz? but it says that it runs at only at 2.8GHz what does the 1.6 GHz mean?
Yamahaphone 2 years ago
NICE!!
Milosz2121 2 years ago
guys, offcourse your'e right: flaps set to 30 at 20.000 ft. landing gear. Butttt, don't forget that this movie is about the great performance of the computer. And not about the flight and mistakes..
stefanholtland 2 years ago
xD whoever was flying that 747 was a SUPER noob. Full flaps and landing gear at like 20,000 ft?
Lmfaoooo
FSXMovies 2 years ago
sandstorm by darude is the name of this song.
pinkfuzz0609 2 years ago
what is the name of this song?
brownie4life0421 2 years ago
can you actually play this game with other online players ?
guitarmaster59 2 years ago
yes you can! just log onto the online area through FSX itself and choose a server!
thefsxflyer2 2 years ago
ok thnx :)
guitarmaster59 2 years ago
dude... omg engage mouse look inside of your cockpit...
Wiggling 2 years ago
HAHAHA1..wtf, one guy's canopy is open LMFAOOO!!
zoulation 2 years ago
Yes...Open air flight lol
8AxeProductions8 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAAAAA!! XD!!
zoulation 2 years ago 7
Have you tried updating your drivers for the GTX295? I heard of someone who did and it had a dramatic increase in performance for FSX. Please let me know as I'm thinking of getting this card.
For all the people posting about how the GTX295 should give better performance - FSX is CPU dependent in terms of frame rate, while the graphic card mainly looks after resolution. This game is very badly optimized and peforms far worse with SLi graphics cards without good drivers.
Steve31000 2 years ago
thos tiny houses eats a lot of mega pixels in a gpu.. the clearer the more gpu activity
niels2029 2 years ago
I think you're doing something wrong, you should be getting Much more FPS with the GTX 295. Your system must be bugged alittle bit.
Coveredfire01 2 years ago
I think it's his processor speed. 2.9 is really low for fsx. he's probably running a 920 OCd, but should be OCd to at least 3.8 on airif not more.
nexus1g 2 years ago
a Intel 920 stock should be fine, it's naturally better then previous dual/quad cores at stock speeds. Even if it's only oc'd ( if it is) to 2.9, that should be plenty with the GTX 295. FSX doesn't require loads of CPU power to run it, it's more of a visual game.
Coveredfire01 2 years ago
920 stock is 2.66. Below 3 you start choking a good card.
nexus1g 2 years ago
not with the i7 cores, the gtx 295 was built with the intention to work exceedingly well with that type of core. Now if it was a regular dual/quad core you would be right.
Coveredfire01 2 years ago
I'm not sure you know what you're talking about.
nexus1g 2 years ago
I know what I'm talking about, you seem to have the assumption that just because the i7-920 has it's stock speed at 2.66, then it would give the same performance as a previous dual/quad core, but your wrong. The i7 may have the same frequency but they are much more powerful, it's like trying to compare AMD and Intel chips off their speeds, you can't do that since they are measured in different ways. The author of this video probably isn't using a i7 core, maybe just a dual or quad.
Coveredfire01 2 years ago
First off, it says in the description that it is on an i7. I know the architecture is different and it's 32nm process. Still, I've seen charts showing at what point the i7 processor chokes current video cards.
My guess is that you're theorizing your standpoint.
nexus1g 2 years ago
Comment removed
Coveredfire01 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well I didn't see that, but you should have looked at it more carefully, he says it's clocked at 2.93, that's a i7 940, not a 920. His cpu should not be bottlenecking his gpu. There are many other parts that could do that, the mobo, the ram type, even the amount of power getting to the parts. It's hard to base our opinions on such restricted information about his entire system though.
Coveredfire01 2 years ago
its the gtx 295, not his CPU, its not good for the game, i should know, i have one
liascm 2 years ago
A GTX 295 can Play Crysis Maxed out, I do not believe the fact that this card couldn't handle this game a peek performance.
Coveredfire01 2 years ago
Because this game is a CPU based game, not GPU, i play crysis maxed out, but i cant play fsx maxed out, in fact 9800gtx+ probably gets better performance in FSX over a gtx 295
liascm 2 years ago
well i have 2x 9800GTX+ cards, also a 3.0GHz x4 Phenom CPU (Overclocked to 3.30GHz (Which means as it is x4 i get 13.2GHz)) it handles FSX fine?
:P
usamichael3 2 years ago
NO you dont understand, the gtx 295 is probably 4x better than your 9800gtx+ however it is not good for the game FSX, it does not play FSX very well, DOES ANYONE UNDERSTAND WHAT IM SAYING,GTX 295 IS BAD FOR FSX,BUT IS GOOD FOR GAMES LIKE CRYSIS,GOD YOU KIDS ARE SO STUPID
liascm 2 years ago
yes lol i understand, and btw, im not a kid, and also you should do one thing, Get a 9800GTX+ a AMD Phenom 3.0GHz x4 overclock it to 3.30GHz x4 and then fucking play all the games.
usamichael3 2 years ago
why would i downgrade my computer to yours to play all games, i already play them all and you cant even play maxed out on half of them with your shitty ass 9800gtx
liascm 2 years ago
god, kids these days ;)
usamichael3 2 years ago 8
you need two gtx 295s to get inmense performance out of fsx.
tony642321 2 years ago
No you don't, its a damn CPU game, not GPU.
liascm 2 years ago
ok then, start fsx, take your Graphics card out and play it. If it uses CPU then it should work(except for you can't see anything)
tony642321 2 years ago
Your such an idiot, without a GPU the game wouldn't even start, neither would your computer and you wouldn't even be able to see anything on your computer, fucking brainless kids
liascm 2 years ago
I'm not a kid you moron, look at my channel, it clearly says that i am 29!!!!!!!
tony642321 2 years ago
The only reason you put in 29 was so you could watch porn on youtube sad little boy, Of course your not 29 since you lack basic grammar skills.
liascm 2 years ago
how do I lack grammar skills? you don't put capital letters after comers!
tony642321 2 years ago
This was how I was taught to do it in school.
liascm 2 years ago
ok fair point. :D
tony642321 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You just owned him!
BXBProductions 2 years ago
You find that it is spelt "comma's", not "comers"
nvidea8400gs 2 years ago
hey buddy fsx is a cpu intesive game , well it needs a gpu to run it but cpu is the main requirment for fsx , and fsx does not support sli or crossfire
bye
fahast 2 years ago
Noobs, Both of you, bow down to the king.
KingSamLopez 2 years ago 2
what's the name of this song? (great video) :)
mastervictor123 2 years ago
Darude - Sandstorm
AirForceAce21 2 years ago
Dude wat kind of frame rates do you get???
JIMAXair 2 years ago
Max Settings with FRAPS 20
without 35
AirForceAce21 2 years ago
That little. Is that running with full screen mode? Without it Im sure you will get at least 50+ Just press alt+enter and then go to the top left of the screen till the diaganol arrow shows up and make the screen a little smaller and center it and you'll get gr8 performance.
JIMAXair 2 years ago