ok quick question....in your opinion, would it be worth my time (and money) to upgrade from my phenom II x4 to the FX-series x4 series cpu's? yes/no, why/why not? cant be bothered to go to x6 or x8 dont have the money lmao.
i guess yiou didnt hear about how they overclocked the 8150 and handed the i7 its ass on a platter and for power consumption i just went to tigerdirect and the i7 extreeme consumes 130 watts to run and the 8150 125watts so much for that! intel now wants to go 22nm like amd isnt thinking of doing the same keep running intel and amd will keep overclocking and awlays hold the crown like right now at 8.4 ghz lol!
@dan75robot xD guess you didn't hear that amd disabled 7 cores to do that. they overclocked 1 core to 8.4. thats kinda horrible. cool they got it that high but they cheated there ass's off by doing it that way. i wonder what this thing can go to with all 8 cores running... it has potential atleast but not compared to intel i5 2500k. same price but the intel still wins sadley, hope amd's next line of 8 cores are badass and actually do murder intel. can't wait for future products =D
@BassDemon420 From what I have researched most BD chips can reach reach 4.4-4.6 ghz with all modules enabled. However BD becomes terribly inneficient and power hungry at those speeds with all modules active. looking at th charts it draws more than 300W at those speeds!! You need a 500W PSU just for the processor! Lol. Some chips wil reach 4.7-4.9ghz all modules active. However to reach 5ghz or higher most review sites had to disable 3 out of the 4 modules:( Which makes it pointless
@lamiac2411 LOL load of bullshit. I overclocked my i5-2500k to 4.5ghz stable and it only pulls 96 watts. When i OC it to 5.0ghz stable it only pulled around 105-110 watts with all 4 cores. so no i don't need a 300 watt PSU just for the CPU. IDK what you been looking at but you gotta keep looking.
@lamiac2411 OOH, yeah well those were there biggest setbacks. Im terribly sorry, I skimmed through the BD part lol. Im so used to saying SB that was my first thing that came to mind. Yeah BD isn't good at all with there efficiency. I really wished it would of been a Intel killer because right when it came out is around the time i was buying me a CPU. i planned on getting it until i saw reviews. Glad i didn't. Intel all the way! but man hopefully AMD redeems themselves.
@BassDemon420 It's all good I've done hat more than I like to admit as well. I feel your pain I held on to my Phenom 965 and my tired Radeon 4890 for .......almost 4 yrs maybe waiting for Bull Dozer. I just built my first Intel Rig last month:) I7 2600k and a GTX SOC 570. I was not happy with BD after seeing such terrible performance. I am blown away with the performance this i7 gives me. I can tell you though thta trusty X4 965 destroyed everything I threw at it. AMD will come back don't worry
@lamiac2411 HOLY MOLY MAN! 1.8Vcore is insane! intel recommends staying below "if i remeber exactly" 1.56. i know 1.5 is pretty high too! i got mine at 4.5 at 1.38. but if it works and its stable then man good job! Yeah my AMD system was Phenom 555 BE OC 4.0. stock voltage. It played all games i wanted fine. It was paired with a 8500 *PUKE* but about 2 weeks after i got the 8500 i bought a GTS450. still puke but it plays all games i want on medium to high 1080p. Can't wait for AMD's new line =D
@BassDemon420 Ummm ya typo on my part Bro sorry LOL. I meant 1.18 not 1.8!! ROFL. Hell no I would never chance 1.8V through my 2600k no flippin way that would fry out in minutes.
@dan75robot thats funny because intel has been in the lead and kicking amds ass for years, and amd finally came up with something good for once. although i do agree the bulldozer a great piece of work, its only one of their FEW good products
@musickid1337 The phenom line of cpu's is one of AMD's best line of products. I would still reccomend a phenom to this day. BD as it exists now is a failure. Phenom has around a 20% IPC detriment compared to Intel parts. While BD has an even worse IPC than Phenom. Hell the 1090T 6 core Phenom is generally faster than BD in most things
@dan75robot It's hard to tell if your an uinformed fanboy or just a troll. ARe you talking about an overclocked 8150 destroying a stock clocked 2600k?? Lol. Really? An overclocked 8150 @ 4.6 ghz just keeps up with the 2600k at it's stock frequency of 3.4 ghz and inches past it in a few things. Hardly "handing its ass on a platter". The 8150 is also producing tremendous heat and ripping over 300W of power from the wall at that speed. OC the i7 at all and BYE BYE 8150 while using less power
@dan75robot yeah but who's gonna have a liquid-nitrogen cooled opened case and will be up playing like battlefield 3 and throwing nitrogen every 5 minutes there, that's too expensive. I hope AMD to develop better "vision" APU's so we can play better on a laptop but 4 now on Intel desktop STOCK processors just smokes any AMD now
@motherboardsorg hey! do you recomment me this Cpu for 200-300$ range, or you think there is something better? I need it for gaming i right now have intel core i7(8 cpus) 2.8Ghz.
I had no idea that people really cared that much about packaging, do you all leave your boxes around so all your friends can see the cool boxes ???? I don't get it sorry.........
at 8:14 I saw the AMD Sticker Logo and I got up to look at my Phenom II logo. I went to touch it and somehow my finger slipped onto my computer's reset button. I was pretty mad.
I like AMD but Intel is still better. I watched this few times just because of the joke at the beginning. That was really good and funny explanation how things are with new AMD processors. It remains to be seen what will do that windows 7 update for FX processors and later generations of FX processors since has been shown that first processors were not that good as later, but that is logical.
Still im sticking with AMD, perhaps if I were hard core gamer would switch to intel...
It's like Barcelona all over again. I feel your pain bro. Been hoping they did something special with all those 2 billion transistors and 8 "cores" but...it was all hype....
@GamerFreakzCOM the hd 6990 ( 2x hd 6970 gpu ) you costs about 550 $ and is double as fast in bf 3 than the gtx 590 ( 2x gtx 580) and the gtx 590 costs about 700 $. in other games nvidida is twice as fast, it belongs to the engine ;)
@ComputerInfoChannel ive seen videos of 550Ti SLI getting good FPS in BF3 and BFBC3 on 1600x1080 or something and its pretty good. I wouldnt spend that much money for a little device which can play games, thats what xbox's and ps3's are for, i dont see why people spend money on silly things
@GamerFreakzCOM Yes the 550ti is nice. but just looking at the hardware of the xbox 360 or ps3 you will never get the same fps on the same settings with a nice pc rig.
@ComputerInfoChannel where did i say it would be better or worse FPS than a xbox or ps3.. consoles have shit specs but the games are designed for those specs and they run the GPU directly through the chip so it doesnt lag. Hence why i said thats why they were created. so people didnt spend crazy money on a piece of hardware which is isnt even needed right now for these games.
@GamerFreakzCOM No you didt say dad but, i just wanted to say that. Thats the nice tzhing, but for the complete graphic experience i prefer gaming pcs :)
@Dex1n Yes, but when intel releases the 8 core cpus amd will have 12 core cpus for the enduser, amd is just a little faster than intel. amd just released a 16 core server cpu for 420 $ it can bosst up, to up to 3ghz in turbo core ;). much better than the intel cpus in this price class ;)
@ComputerInfoChannel God you're dumb... Intel has had the crown for like about 10 years now... And things haven't changed. If you're on a budget buy AMD. If you have the moeny go for Intel because it is much better. 8 core Intel rapes 12 core AMD in the asshole. You're just stupid AMD fanboy as your previous comments show. And for gaming Intel i7 2600k and i5 2500K eat Bulldozer for breakfast. i5 2500K is actually cheaper than 8150... More cores doesnt mean its better dumb
@Dex1n Yes in gaming the 2500k 2600k and 2700k are better at this time, but in 6 months or sth when some games suppoert full 8 cores. i have got a 8150 and crysis 2 on highest settings sucks about 40 % cpu :D. but a 8 core intel costs about 800 $ i would compare a amd 16 core and a intel 8 core becuase they are priced the same. mhmmm amd 16 core start at 500$
@ComputerInfoChannel How little you know about computer hardware... 1 Intel core and 1 AMD core are not the same. Everyone with brain in their head can figure that out, since they are made by different companies. 1 Intel core is about equal to 2 AMD cores, actually even more. 4 core i7 Sandy eats Bulldozer for breakfast. Many also consider 8150 really just as 4 core. Cause it has 4 modules each module has 2 cores. And it seems to be that 1 AMD module = about 1 Intel core...
@ComputerInfoChannel In 6 months there are Ivy Bridges which will wipe the floor with your Bulldozer lol haha ;D They are estimated to be up to 50% faster than Sandy Bridge. With even lower power consumption. Sandy Bridge draws less power on load than Bulldozer. On idle Bulldozer uses bit less, so Buldozer is a good buy for people who turn their PC on and do nothing with it xDDD
@killersaad Again, every performance user will use dedicated graphics card. No one cares about integrated GPU... Except those who just browse internet and don't play games or don't do any other demanding stuff with their pc. And in the CPU power Intel is light years ahead of AMD. For graphics card AMD is a good choice, although you can't go wrong with nvidia either, but AMD CPUs suck cocks compared to Intel's.
@ComputerInfoChannel Because Intel and AMD are different companies, their cores are not the same. Obviously their whole architechture is different. It's stupid to say "haha AMD has 2 times cores so its better!" When in fact in the benchmarks 4 core Intel beats 8 core AMD... 1 Intel Sandy Bridge core is at least twice as fast as 1 AMD Bulldozer core.
i would die for AMD but, i was laughing my ass off when he stated comparing the packaging ... XD ..... this guy made my day ...
after all, intel is a great company , but they have a big problem with their everyday socket changing ... thats all i have against them ,, ah also overpriced ..
I think the FX-8150 is actually a good value. Its faster than i5 2500k and can best 2600k on some games. I think the initial reviews of the FX-8150 threw some people off, but AMD really did create a worthwhile chip that is priced appropriately. Check out the benchmarks on kitguru and hardwareheaven websites.
The benchmarks you see online aren't necessarily accurate. The way the Bulldozer cores are put together is different and the OS needs to be aware of that. Many issues are actually caused by the scheduler in windows 7 (which is why people say that you should disable every second core) and I hope they're working on an update for this. AMD is working hard for a kernel update for Linux distros.
Cut AMD some slack. The FX-8150 is extremely underrated.
@bizzlebizzle1994 Your comment is believable but the thing is we don't need a 8 core now, AMD should of wait for Intel's release and then try to blow them with a 8-Core. But still am happy with my 1090T ^_^.
@iMakeAtheistAngry Ya ya ... AMD blowing away intel 8 core .... Yawns .... let them first beat the 990x true six core ... .... again Yawns .... And my 1090T ... still its slower than a i7 2600 :P go chill out dude :D
No plans in starting a war here ... i jus got tickled when i saw u say "AMD should of wait for Intel's release and then try to blow them with a 8-Core." LOL to the max :P
@bizzlebizzle1994 You can see the server legacy in this thing, it's made for software that's actually written properly to make use of all those threads (which Windows isn't, unless you run the server version), never mind most of the software running on top of it. I'm sure we'll see more mainstream 4 and 6 core versions beat this thing soon enough, unless you couple it with software that actually makes full use of it.
@bizzlebizzle1994 Its not that i dont belive you, but is there any source for this? im building a computer next month, and dont know what to choose, 2.5k or this.
Seriously though, their design choices for this architecture were just bad. You should never share a fetch/decode, that always ends badly. Also, microprocessor companies should be designing architectures that run pre-existing practical processes well, not make pre-existing software have to conform to your backward architecture that would require excessive parallelism just to get acceptable results.
i say intel > amd since most people build computers for mostly gaming these days + you can do most video editing on intel cpu aswell so my choice spend abit extra the better cpu
my god.. he blinks! :o
AmuZHD 17 hours ago
Ahhh I see he just blinks fast
modernops101 2 days ago
which one is more recommended for video editing like premiere and after effects?
danicarrizo11 1 week ago
WEI score???
TheNorbi80 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ok quick question....in your opinion, would it be worth my time (and money) to upgrade from my phenom II x4 to the FX-series x4 series cpu's? yes/no, why/why not? cant be bothered to go to x6 or x8 dont have the money lmao.
Kantrishikrar 1 week ago
is amd 8core faster nd stronger than intels 8 core for apple 8 core mac pro
beepsbobby1 1 week ago
@beepsbobby1 hell no man, I use it and its about the same strength as the i5 cause I have a computer with an i5
PsiloCybinDreamX 6 days ago
@dan75robot Through overclocking and making it work SO hard. i7 breezes through everything standard without breaking a sweat.
frascht94 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
nerbne 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
nerbne 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
nerbne 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
nerbne 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is an AM3+,but 760G(780L) chipset enough to get out the maximum of this CPU???
TheNorbi80 2 weeks ago
WEI score ,pls for stock fx 8120.(windows experience index score).Thank you!!!
TheNorbi80 2 weeks ago
i love mine
FreeForAllGamerz 2 weeks ago
My 8120 ran no hotter than 47 Degrees Celsius during testing not overclocked!
Str8trips 3 weeks ago
2:54 if u swing it like that ull get another band-aid lmao
homes24 4 weeks ago
What camera are you using? I love the quality and everything really. Whats your camera your recording with!!?
Broth3rz 4 weeks ago
Please buy the new 3930K six core on sandy im curious how it is lol
puppetmasterofdeath1 1 month ago
lol I didn't see him blink, that takes skill.
MontyMiller1 1 month ago
is this cpu worth for gaming?
daballaskind 1 month ago
@daballaskind yes
oWhiteMonster 1 month ago
@daballaskind no.get the beast 2500k or 2600k
buzz9961 1 month ago
@daballaskind no get a 2500k
crimson177 1 month ago
I bought this ... waiting for it to be delivered !!!!
LAZrailkapinda 1 month ago
WHahhaa I LAUGED MY ASS .. the packaging comparisson was FUNNYY
LAZrailkapinda 1 month ago
AMD still uses pins...?
LtSurge659 1 month ago
i guess yiou didnt hear about how they overclocked the 8150 and handed the i7 its ass on a platter and for power consumption i just went to tigerdirect and the i7 extreeme consumes 130 watts to run and the 8150 125watts so much for that! intel now wants to go 22nm like amd isnt thinking of doing the same keep running intel and amd will keep overclocking and awlays hold the crown like right now at 8.4 ghz lol!
dan75robot 1 month ago 19
@dan75robot xD guess you didn't hear that amd disabled 7 cores to do that. they overclocked 1 core to 8.4. thats kinda horrible. cool they got it that high but they cheated there ass's off by doing it that way. i wonder what this thing can go to with all 8 cores running... it has potential atleast but not compared to intel i5 2500k. same price but the intel still wins sadley, hope amd's next line of 8 cores are badass and actually do murder intel. can't wait for future products =D
BassDemon420 1 month ago
@BassDemon420 From what I have researched most BD chips can reach reach 4.4-4.6 ghz with all modules enabled. However BD becomes terribly inneficient and power hungry at those speeds with all modules active. looking at th charts it draws more than 300W at those speeds!! You need a 500W PSU just for the processor! Lol. Some chips wil reach 4.7-4.9ghz all modules active. However to reach 5ghz or higher most review sites had to disable 3 out of the 4 modules:( Which makes it pointless
lamiac2411 3 weeks ago
@lamiac2411 LOL load of bullshit. I overclocked my i5-2500k to 4.5ghz stable and it only pulls 96 watts. When i OC it to 5.0ghz stable it only pulled around 105-110 watts with all 4 cores. so no i don't need a 300 watt PSU just for the CPU. IDK what you been looking at but you gotta keep looking.
BassDemon420 3 weeks ago
@BassDemon420 I was referring to BD not SB. You read what I posted wrong
lamiac2411 3 weeks ago
@lamiac2411 OOH, yeah well those were there biggest setbacks. Im terribly sorry, I skimmed through the BD part lol. Im so used to saying SB that was my first thing that came to mind. Yeah BD isn't good at all with there efficiency. I really wished it would of been a Intel killer because right when it came out is around the time i was buying me a CPU. i planned on getting it until i saw reviews. Glad i didn't. Intel all the way! but man hopefully AMD redeems themselves.
BassDemon420 3 weeks ago
@BassDemon420 It's all good I've done hat more than I like to admit as well. I feel your pain I held on to my Phenom 965 and my tired Radeon 4890 for .......almost 4 yrs maybe waiting for Bull Dozer. I just built my first Intel Rig last month:) I7 2600k and a GTX SOC 570. I was not happy with BD after seeing such terrible performance. I am blown away with the performance this i7 gives me. I can tell you though thta trusty X4 965 destroyed everything I threw at it. AMD will come back don't worry
lamiac2411 3 weeks ago
@lamiac2411 HOLY MOLY MAN! 1.8Vcore is insane! intel recommends staying below "if i remeber exactly" 1.56. i know 1.5 is pretty high too! i got mine at 4.5 at 1.38. but if it works and its stable then man good job! Yeah my AMD system was Phenom 555 BE OC 4.0. stock voltage. It played all games i wanted fine. It was paired with a 8500 *PUKE* but about 2 weeks after i got the 8500 i bought a GTS450. still puke but it plays all games i want on medium to high 1080p. Can't wait for AMD's new line =D
BassDemon420 3 weeks ago
@BassDemon420 Ummm ya typo on my part Bro sorry LOL. I meant 1.18 not 1.8!! ROFL. Hell no I would never chance 1.8V through my 2600k no flippin way that would fry out in minutes.
lamiac2411 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
lamiac2411 3 weeks ago
@dan75robot thats funny because intel has been in the lead and kicking amds ass for years, and amd finally came up with something good for once. although i do agree the bulldozer a great piece of work, its only one of their FEW good products
musickid1337 1 month ago
@musickid1337 The phenom line of cpu's is one of AMD's best line of products. I would still reccomend a phenom to this day. BD as it exists now is a failure. Phenom has around a 20% IPC detriment compared to Intel parts. While BD has an even worse IPC than Phenom. Hell the 1090T 6 core Phenom is generally faster than BD in most things
lamiac2411 3 weeks ago
@dan75robot thats ok,no game will ever use 8 cores neither will any application so a quad intel would still be faster
robthatguyx 1 month ago
@dan75robot You realize that was only using 2 of the 8 cores, right?
303HQ 1 month ago
@dan75robot It's hard to tell if your an uinformed fanboy or just a troll. ARe you talking about an overclocked 8150 destroying a stock clocked 2600k?? Lol. Really? An overclocked 8150 @ 4.6 ghz just keeps up with the 2600k at it's stock frequency of 3.4 ghz and inches past it in a few things. Hardly "handing its ass on a platter". The 8150 is also producing tremendous heat and ripping over 300W of power from the wall at that speed. OC the i7 at all and BYE BYE 8150 while using less power
lamiac2411 3 weeks ago
@dan75robot yeah but who's gonna have a liquid-nitrogen cooled opened case and will be up playing like battlefield 3 and throwing nitrogen every 5 minutes there, that's too expensive. I hope AMD to develop better "vision" APU's so we can play better on a laptop but 4 now on Intel desktop STOCK processors just smokes any AMD now
xXDhamoXx 6 days ago
@dan75robot LOL yeah 8.4 ghz with 1 core active and it still would fail in performance
Joshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh1 6 days ago
he cut his finger on the metal box you don't get cut on cardboard
Tomthetoolman100 1 month ago
LMFAO funny stuff
xeodus9 1 month ago
I'm pretty sure that AMD made a spelling mistake at 3:17 "Game play" instead of gameplay.... Not good enough AMD not good enough...
PeterDK3 1 month ago
@PeterDK3 You Saddo
Reecemint08 1 month ago
hahahaha ,, ur the best
hahahaai 1 month ago
@motherboardsorg hey! do you recomment me this Cpu for 200-300$ range, or you think there is something better? I need it for gaming i right now have intel core i7(8 cpus) 2.8Ghz.
Cheers, thanks for the video
krisakias 1 month ago
He doesnt blink he winls
THEREVERify 1 month ago
haha - nice review!
Bruce777999 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can someone tell me the advantages of AMD FX-8120 please? Reply to this thanks
Stefanoulis91 2 months ago
how much could you overclock this with the stock cooler????
pike98765432 2 months ago
MADE IN MALAYSIA... state of penang, my state!
TheSeluarbiru 2 months ago 5
should i buy core i7 2600k for gaming or the new fx 8120 for performance??
Turkish4evers 2 months ago
@Turkish4evers bulldozer is yet to be perfected with motherboards and OS updates so i would go for bulldozer because its newer ;P
GamerFreakzCOM 2 months ago
3:33 That's what she said
mouldycrouton 2 months ago
go intel come amd sucks
helloamill 2 months ago
I had no idea that people really cared that much about packaging, do you all leave your boxes around so all your friends can see the cool boxes ???? I don't get it sorry.........
shunkajun 2 months ago
Will you please blink!!! You're making me feel uncomfortable.
megadog103 2 months ago 36
@megadog103 why i cant like(thumbs up) your comment?
ThePakenshet 2 months ago
@ThePakenshet I don't know:D
megadog103 2 months ago
@megadog103 he blinks like ten times....
StevenJordanGaming 2 months ago
@StevenJordanGaming check out his other videos...
megadog103 2 months ago
@megadog103 he blinked about four times in the first 30 seconds (and for him that is enough for the rest of the day)
xXM4xksaXx 2 months ago
@megadog103 He blinks all the time.
brunofunny 1 month ago
@megadog103 did you know his a robot
MsPcengineer 2 weeks ago
box is not important
matters is the performance
TheFrostmourne7 3 months ago
yo cut your finger with that knife didn't you :)
humantestdummy 3 months ago
Fuck the box. Multithreading is what counts.
bunyaadi 3 months ago
woot for AMDs Box.
Logan800 3 months ago
i5 4.8 ghz :)
mindharvester 3 months ago
@mindharvester
well,when overclocked.
FirstDragonSlayer 3 months ago
F you...
oh packaging...
sry!
terraage 3 months ago
at 8:14 I saw the AMD Sticker Logo and I got up to look at my Phenom II logo. I went to touch it and somehow my finger slipped onto my computer's reset button. I was pretty mad.
TheOriginalRuskin 3 months ago
This is the 8120, there is the 8150 and in 2012 there will be a 8170 and maybe a black edition later, hopefully with the same prices :D
katoun9 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SANTI ALL REVIEWS WERE DONE ON ASUS Crosshair (RIGGED)
ASUS Crosshair V Formula and motherboards of gigabyte = FAIL
AMD FX 8150 on ASrock fx990 extreme is a 30% faster than the motherboards of asus and gigabyte
TheMmakk 3 months ago
I'm definately buying this just for the packaging!!!
123thepyro123 3 months ago
I like AMD but Intel is still better. I watched this few times just because of the joke at the beginning. That was really good and funny explanation how things are with new AMD processors. It remains to be seen what will do that windows 7 update for FX processors and later generations of FX processors since has been shown that first processors were not that good as later, but that is logical.
Still im sticking with AMD, perhaps if I were hard core gamer would switch to intel...
Sk0lm 3 months ago
i r iz buying it for me new pcsszzz
skilllol101 3 months ago
I bet you cut yourself with that very same knife. lol
coolbuddydude1 3 months ago
in my point of view this is a 4 core CPU
MadeInMinecraft 3 months ago
LOL the start of the video.his sad just because of the packaging xD
haqeem18 4 months ago
It's like Barcelona all over again. I feel your pain bro. Been hoping they did something special with all those 2 billion transistors and 8 "cores" but...it was all hype....
kalimul 4 months ago
@MetalHeadNed666 At most four cores. So it doesn't use any more than 4 cores.
Thegrandhighoracle 4 months ago
its liquid cooled? lol
chaosquall1 4 months ago
@MetalHeadNed666 Games only use at most 4 cores
Thegrandhighoracle 4 months ago
@Thegrandhighoracle FSX uses more than that, and that's only true for now.
ILiveForMusic11 4 months ago
Dustin Bowder?
MrRaebodep 4 months ago
@MatthewRichmond Agreed...
Oh well...
i have a Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7 waiting for when then do :P
hodgoes2001 4 months ago
YO man are u ok? u seem a little shaky the entire time
zainthesnipe 4 months ago
when games acutally start taking use of more than 4 cores amd's gonna rock. but im still happy with my 965 BE.
IgotGreens101 4 months ago 20
@IgotGreens101 Bulldozer failed even with his 8 cores
3dkiller 3 months ago
@3dkiller I bet if you took a game that requires 8 cores then pit them up we'll see how bulldozer is the only CPU viable lol.
ThomasCreel 3 months ago
@IgotGreens101 happy with mine too, thumbs up brother
Akaecius 3 months ago
@IgotGreens101 I don't think so.
masterbrice 3 months ago
@IgotGreens101 lol die hard amd fanboy, I switched from a 4 ghz 965 BE to a 2500k 4.8 ghz and the difference is like 50%
Thryack 3 months ago
@Thryack how is he a die hard fan jesus youre a prick go advertise somewhere else you INTEL fanboy i bet you are a nividiot too huh?
TheSkittlesNerd 3 months ago
@TheSkittlesNerd shut the fuck up fat american, I'm an amd guy (i fucking hate nvidia)
Thryack 3 months ago
@TheSkittlesNerd i bet you are mid-range atiretarded
mindharvester 3 months ago
@mindharvester Nope I Have a gtx 560 ti with a i7 200k wich I got for cheap before I was looking at this.
TheSkittlesNerd 2 months ago
@TheSkittlesNerd nice rig
ComputerInfoChannel 2 months ago
@TheSkittlesNerd Nvidia are good, INTEL sucks but i hate them anyway. AMD and Nvidia are awesome. AMD GPU sucks
GamerFreakzCOM 2 months ago
@GamerFreakzCOM the hd 6990 ( 2x hd 6970 gpu ) you costs about 550 $ and is double as fast in bf 3 than the gtx 590 ( 2x gtx 580) and the gtx 590 costs about 700 $. in other games nvidida is twice as fast, it belongs to the engine ;)
ComputerInfoChannel 2 months ago
@ComputerInfoChannel ive seen videos of 550Ti SLI getting good FPS in BF3 and BFBC3 on 1600x1080 or something and its pretty good. I wouldnt spend that much money for a little device which can play games, thats what xbox's and ps3's are for, i dont see why people spend money on silly things
GamerFreakzCOM 2 months ago
@GamerFreakzCOM Yes the 550ti is nice. but just looking at the hardware of the xbox 360 or ps3 you will never get the same fps on the same settings with a nice pc rig.
ComputerInfoChannel 2 months ago
@ComputerInfoChannel where did i say it would be better or worse FPS than a xbox or ps3.. consoles have shit specs but the games are designed for those specs and they run the GPU directly through the chip so it doesnt lag. Hence why i said thats why they were created. so people didnt spend crazy money on a piece of hardware which is isnt even needed right now for these games.
GamerFreakzCOM 2 months ago
@GamerFreakzCOM No you didt say dad but, i just wanted to say that. Thats the nice tzhing, but for the complete graphic experience i prefer gaming pcs :)
ComputerInfoChannel 2 months ago
@IgotGreens101 When they start using 8 cores there are much better 8 core CPUs available... Most games today hardly even use 4 cores fully...
Dex1n 3 months ago
@Dex1n Yes, but when intel releases the 8 core cpus amd will have 12 core cpus for the enduser, amd is just a little faster than intel. amd just released a 16 core server cpu for 420 $ it can bosst up, to up to 3ghz in turbo core ;). much better than the intel cpus in this price class ;)
ComputerInfoChannel 2 months ago
@ComputerInfoChannel God you're dumb... Intel has had the crown for like about 10 years now... And things haven't changed. If you're on a budget buy AMD. If you have the moeny go for Intel because it is much better. 8 core Intel rapes 12 core AMD in the asshole. You're just stupid AMD fanboy as your previous comments show. And for gaming Intel i7 2600k and i5 2500K eat Bulldozer for breakfast. i5 2500K is actually cheaper than 8150... More cores doesnt mean its better dumb
Dex1n 2 months ago
@Dex1n Yes in gaming the 2500k 2600k and 2700k are better at this time, but in 6 months or sth when some games suppoert full 8 cores. i have got a 8150 and crysis 2 on highest settings sucks about 40 % cpu :D. but a 8 core intel costs about 800 $ i would compare a amd 16 core and a intel 8 core becuase they are priced the same. mhmmm amd 16 core start at 500$
ComputerInfoChannel 2 months ago
@ComputerInfoChannel How little you know about computer hardware... 1 Intel core and 1 AMD core are not the same. Everyone with brain in their head can figure that out, since they are made by different companies. 1 Intel core is about equal to 2 AMD cores, actually even more. 4 core i7 Sandy eats Bulldozer for breakfast. Many also consider 8150 really just as 4 core. Cause it has 4 modules each module has 2 cores. And it seems to be that 1 AMD module = about 1 Intel core...
Dex1n 2 months ago
@ComputerInfoChannel In 6 months there are Ivy Bridges which will wipe the floor with your Bulldozer lol haha ;D They are estimated to be up to 50% faster than Sandy Bridge. With even lower power consumption. Sandy Bridge draws less power on load than Bulldozer. On idle Bulldozer uses bit less, so Buldozer is a good buy for people who turn their PC on and do nothing with it xDDD
Dex1n 2 months ago
@Dex1n Its 50% faster with the intergrated GPU, the CPU will be 10%-15% better than Sandy Bridge.
killersaad 2 months ago
@killersaad Again, every performance user will use dedicated graphics card. No one cares about integrated GPU... Except those who just browse internet and don't play games or don't do any other demanding stuff with their pc. And in the CPU power Intel is light years ahead of AMD. For graphics card AMD is a good choice, although you can't go wrong with nvidia either, but AMD CPUs suck cocks compared to Intel's.
Dex1n 2 months ago
@ComputerInfoChannel Amd 16 core loses against 8 core intel lol...
Dex1n 2 months ago
@ComputerInfoChannel Because Intel and AMD are different companies, their cores are not the same. Obviously their whole architechture is different. It's stupid to say "haha AMD has 2 times cores so its better!" When in fact in the benchmarks 4 core Intel beats 8 core AMD... 1 Intel Sandy Bridge core is at least twice as fast as 1 AMD Bulldozer core.
Dex1n 2 months ago
@Dex1n Benchmarks are not reallife homie
ComputerInfoChannel 2 months ago
@IgotGreens101 Thats soo true i have got a 8150 and can run crysis 1 & 2 and far cry 2 without lagging :P at the same time :O. multitasking pure ;9
ComputerInfoChannel 2 months ago
@IgotGreens101
the 965 is a beast
Sectionxx8 2 months ago
Purple Band-aid FTW!
FisheyDude 4 months ago
Like your intro :D
techymarky 4 months ago
hm...
going to stick with my old 1090T...
it is running at 4.5Ghz...
WITH ALL 6 CORES!!...
lol
hodgoes2001 4 months ago
i would die for AMD but, i was laughing my ass off when he stated comparing the packaging ... XD ..... this guy made my day ...
after all, intel is a great company , but they have a big problem with their everyday socket changing ... thats all i have against them ,, ah also overpriced ..
in2Raven 4 months ago
@RadeonHD6950 please refer to 0:57
ryanbryne 4 months ago
@RadeonHD6950 4+4=12 holy crap! and i thought wheels are round ....
bladestring 4 months ago
>8 cores
>not 4 cores and 4 modules
Ridonculus 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS IS THE PROBLEM: ASUS Crosshair V Formula and motherboards of gigabyte.....
AMD FX 8150 on ASrock fx990 extreme is a 30% faster than the motherboards of asus and gigabyte
Santi382 4 months ago 3
Maybe u should try hollywood,Good acting
auditoreezio23 4 months ago
I think the FX-8150 is actually a good value. Its faster than i5 2500k and can best 2600k on some games. I think the initial reviews of the FX-8150 threw some people off, but AMD really did create a worthwhile chip that is priced appropriately. Check out the benchmarks on kitguru and hardwareheaven websites.
LordSamuelJ 4 months ago
I hope this gets better when the arch will be optimized (aswell as the games).
Darkteammadfiz 4 months ago
Hahahaha...nice intro!
thinkcomputers1 4 months ago
I just love your crazy funny sense of humour
Catrapazau 4 months ago
no way, intel is still the best. I mean AMD still has to use 8 cores to beat a quad core from intel. Thats like comparing apples with pears!
jrpower5 4 months ago
I'm wondering the performance difference between AMD FX-4100 Zambezi 4 core and the phenom 4 cores.
cummings4409 4 months ago
the i5 2500k k?
SocialFX 4 months ago
unbox the FX 4100..
wixx95 4 months ago
That's crazy.
puterman028 4 months ago
don't even think about using the stock cooler it sucks worse than the preveiwers on this cpu.....load that B*TCH and watch it scream!!!
this thing will be screaming at you "is that all you got!" and "bring it on!"
seriouly when was the last time you complained about note pad not being fast enough?
juggernautxtr 4 months ago
hahahaha, the joke was hilarious.
VladimirLemLem 4 months ago
Comment removed
Swagdaddy777 4 months ago
This should have been an un-tinning not un-boxing
Drex088 4 months ago 11
the amd 6 cores uses 125 watts
Barnaby0014 4 months ago
I got my motherboard good and drunk now what do I do Elric?
tightj1 4 months ago
If you going to buy a CPU microcenter must go to
SuperSkeem 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hahhahah 0:32 lol yeath
SuperSkeem 4 months ago
hahhahah 32 lol yeath
SuperSkeem 4 months ago
lol amd...
chatch15117 4 months ago
** The FX-8150 is extremely Overrated **
Dystt 4 months ago
@Dystt Actually its extremely under-rated.
IAmSomeoneOrOther 4 months ago
shut the fuck up if you dont like amd and go fuck your seflf mother fucker ok?!!!!
fanicafanica 4 months ago
@fanicafanica Umad bro? :/)
wtftate 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
winning --- Sent From motherboardsorg's AppRats (Facebook App)!
TheP1TM4N 4 months ago
hahaahahahaaha ,funny INTRO :D!!
HassanHawasMusic 4 months ago
I'll wait for the FX-8170 at least, and give a biscuit tin collector the nice packaging.
brunobanaful 4 months ago
@Irun11s Thx for the answer bro? U helped me a lot xD!
superhuman501 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why is everyone hating on the FX-8150?
The benchmarks you see online aren't necessarily accurate. The way the Bulldozer cores are put together is different and the OS needs to be aware of that. Many issues are actually caused by the scheduler in windows 7 (which is why people say that you should disable every second core) and I hope they're working on an update for this. AMD is working hard for a kernel update for Linux distros.
Cut AMD some slack. The FX-8150 is extremely underrated.
bizzlebizzle1994 4 months ago 19
@bizzlebizzle1994 Also it syncs in with the GPU's cpu for better preformance.
wtftate 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bizzlebizzle1994 Your comment is believable but the thing is we don't need a 8 core now, AMD should of wait for Intel's release and then try to blow them with a 8-Core. But still am happy with my 1090T ^_^.
iMakeAtheistAngry 4 months ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@iMakeAtheistAngry Ya ya ... AMD blowing away intel 8 core .... Yawns .... let them first beat the 990x true six core ... .... again Yawns .... And my 1090T ... still its slower than a i7 2600 :P go chill out dude :D
No plans in starting a war here ... i jus got tickled when i saw u say "AMD should of wait for Intel's release and then try to blow them with a 8-Core." LOL to the max :P
karthik2727 4 months ago
@iMakeAtheistAngry that's what they said when athlon 64 x2 came out.
juggernautxtr 4 months ago
@bizzlebizzle1994 You can see the server legacy in this thing, it's made for software that's actually written properly to make use of all those threads (which Windows isn't, unless you run the server version), never mind most of the software running on top of it. I'm sure we'll see more mainstream 4 and 6 core versions beat this thing soon enough, unless you couple it with software that actually makes full use of it.
TalesOfWar 4 months ago
@bizzlebizzle1994
Man, you're right! I'm not a fanboy and I respect Intel products but everybody's been killing AMD.
I'm building a new system with this in it.
TrueGamerNET 4 months ago
@bizzlebizzle1994 Its not that i dont belive you, but is there any source for this? im building a computer next month, and dont know what to choose, 2.5k or this.
Umbra360 4 months ago
@bizzlebizzle1994 MORE COREZ
Seriously though, their design choices for this architecture were just bad. You should never share a fetch/decode, that always ends badly. Also, microprocessor companies should be designing architectures that run pre-existing practical processes well, not make pre-existing software have to conform to your backward architecture that would require excessive parallelism just to get acceptable results.
reduxtsar 4 months ago
EPIC begining!....lol
RasJahbu 4 months ago
I've heard bad things about this.
HiImNickWhoAreU 4 months ago
Will be waiting...
khallodah1 4 months ago
i say intel > amd since most people build computers for mostly gaming these days + you can do most video editing on intel cpu aswell so my choice spend abit extra the better cpu
INTEL ALL DA WAY :)
bigbearz88 4 months ago