Were you speeding? Because the last time I checked, speeding is a crime and just as with every other crime, there is a punishment. I deeply appreciate you wasting tax payers money on this. Keep up the great work!
@bowla5086: how did he waste tax dollars? I'm not with their activist group, but simple observation... everyone regardless of the crime accused is given a court summons to appear. The dude wasnt in county lockup.. thats tax dollars... And the guy represented himself.. no public defender or tax dollars there.
@Paperclown Time is money in the court system, you waste their time by not lying down and taking it. If you try to exercise your rights, they don't like it. It's just a money making scam. That's why we have 25% of the world prison population, but only 5% of the world population.
@meeio442: oh they make plenty of money as it is alright on bs Disorderly Conduct charges that every city can slap on people for AnYTHInG and it is cheaper for people to lay down and take the charge than hire a defense attorney !!
@meeio442 Actually, in a court operating under the constitution of the United States, the state must prove "injury", i.e., who suffered damage, was endangered, or rights were violated by this man's actions? The officer lodged the only complaint and testified he was not harmed nor felt himself at risk. He perjured himself to boot. Case dismissed. Do not say "I know my rights!".... exercise them. Peace.
We're all sheep! We're the ones who listen to ridiculous interpretations of the law that have no grounding in intelligent commentary and then watch videos with ads placed in them by the creator..oh WAIT that's you. Might I add that even if a speeding offence required the element of harm, it doesn't, the harm could easily be argued as potential. For isntance if i run around shooting a gun there is not necessarily a victim suffering harm but there could be if I am allowed to continue
god bless you guys. the average ignorant person might not understand that you are also fighting for MY rights, and my family's rights as you do your brave work, but i do. and i thank you for it.
The highway concerned is indeed a speed trap and a fine collectors delight. it does go from 50 to 35 just like that...have to watch your ass especially if you are unfamiliar with that highway.
If you read the state constitution, you are probably the ONLY ONE in the courtroom who has! You guys give me inspiration. Here in Maryland, they've used our state constitution for toilet paper at the Governor's Mansion. Our Gov and his ilk are openly aiding and abetting illegal aliens and PROUDLY operating in direct conflict to their Oaths of Office. FIGHT BACK.. it's the only thing that PRESERVES freedom.
Your better argument would have been that you were not traveling at a rate of speed was unreasonable under the circumstances. Also, there was no evidence that the trooper was qualified to operate that radar or how he tested it was operating properly.
You have to attack the actual radar and just because someone is trained in it's use does not make him/her and expert. There are many questions I would have asked concerning this officers use of the radar "unit" For instance..just because someone might know how to turn on and play an X-Box, doesn't mean it can't malfunction. So the question becomes weather or not the cop fixes his own radar gun and how he can tell weather or not it's broken. Company x-prts won't come because of privacy prot laws.
you should have requested the police tape from the officer's vehicle under the freedom of information act as part of you deffence . then the you could have the officer lying under oath
Great way to look like a fool and waste the court's time. The cops may or may not be jerks. They may or may not be wrong. But the way this kid attempted to prove his innocence was ridiculous. It contained no legal defense(s) whatsoever. It was a social commentary that had no value whatsoever. Good job admitting guilt.
@CSATexan I understand your point, but there are not signs posted on the sides of the road saying "Molesting Butterflies May Result in Fine". However, there are speed limit signs posted all over the roads. Don't play stupid with me. It's a simple fine. Man up.
@CSATexan No... in other words I'm not a butterfly molester. There are no signs saying murder is illegal either so your logic is complete crap. In most cases speed limits are in place to save lives.
It would be the judgment call of the official if you molested the butterflies or not. I go camping all the time and do know a lot of the rules. Picking up a few sticks is not allowed this is made very clear to everyone.
But there is no way I would know if a certain plant or lizard is not to be molested. By molested they mean disturbed, killed, chased away etc etc etc.
You say the signs are everywhere, sure in a big city they are. But the same does not apply to small towns who intentionally place signs where they are easily overlooked.
IE you are driving 70 MPH on the main interstate in West Texas it is 200 miles from ANYWHERE suddenly you go over a hill and on the other side it says 50 MPH and the cop is right there with a radar gun. GUESS WHAT???? You just got busted.
@CSATexan I grew up in a small town so I know what you mean. 1,100 people. I could see the officer being reasonable in this instance. However, traveling at that same rate of speed after the missing the sign because you were too busy talking on your phone is a different story.
You do agree that if the person feels he was wrong he should take it to court.
I wouldn't fight the cop that is for sure. I wouldn't get into an argument with him.
But a person does have a right to question any law that he feels is wrong, which is what this dude did. He was driving along, I am sure he didn't know he was speeding and got a ticket which he felt he didn't deserve
@CSATexan Yes, I agree 100%. I also believe most people have a very skewed vision of what is "right" and what is "wrong". Which is where the judge comes in... and even then that person is still a human being. I was surprised to hear the verdict on the vid response to this. Thanks for the responses! It's good to have a conversation without someone turning it into a flame war.
@CSATexan Ha. I really don't know. I never read it in HS and I had the time to read it when I was overseas in Iraq so I figured I'd take the time to make myself less ignorant. It really is a depressing book and I guess at the time I really could relate to it. The line "I hunt people in this hat." killed me. I have a sick sense of humor I guess. I still love the book despite the criticism it gets from a lot of younger readers today.
Is there a clear statute that states driving over the speed limit is illegal and subject to a fine? Someone please help explain how he had the balls to fight this and think he would win.
So basically what you people deffending the officers are saying is " That everyone is guilty until proven innocent! If you don't know your rights, you have no rights" And if you don't exercise your rights, you lose them!
I'm not employed by any governmental agency (not in law enforcement...) -- but what I see here is you making a MOCKERY of the court. I applaud the judge for his patience and fairness.
Why don't you go after the IRS? Now THE INCOME TAX -- That's against the constitution.
@msk7046 Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States..."
@cycloudd You could have also cited the 16th Amendment which says, "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
the fact that u participated in a trial, they got u, u gave them jurisdiction.. this court is not a real court, we must demand their delegation of authority certificate
speed limits are set in place for a reason. Although this guy didn't injure anyone like he mentioned it doesn't mean he couldn't on another day. This was standard procedure for a police officer to write this ticket and as a notice to him to slow the fuck down... I would be happy to know officers are looking out for the safety of all. Ignorant asshole this kid is.
@kzaryckiproductions If that reason is for the purpose of a speed trap, as it surely sounded to be by the testimonies, why should people not challenge that? By the constitution, we should.
@sheetmetaldept10 cops do what they want, but they have to answer to charges made against them, and it must be mde in a court that is equitable.. meaning, u cant file paper work in the same court that is trying u.. other than to start a paper trail.. to be used in a higher court
you guys are fucking morons for letting the government push you around and control your life...stop hatein on us that run our own lives..only sheep consent to illegal searchs by the biggest gang in the US
Why go through all this crap? You could just claim common law. ;-) watch?v=RVxV9gJoHAE Granted, this is how the system will change.... and it needs to.
The judge, the police, court clerk, are all employees of a corporation known as the state of New Hampshire. We are Tax Slaves to Corporations masquerading as governments. We don't own our property, we are "SERFS" on our property, the property is own by the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES, we pay rent in the form of property tax.
Its now the burden of the state to prove that the Police car was in fact stationary and not behind the defendants car. His defence will hold since it is protected by Constitutional rights.
I find it hard to believe you won although good try. Supposedly they have to see you speed before using the gun. I KNOW they do not. If this cop had rear mounted radar and was sitting in his car facing the direction you were driving, how could he see you speeding as opposed to just looking at the radar and seeing a number? How did he measure your speed by looking at you pass other cars, did he know how fast the other cars were traveling? Did he use the gun on them for reference?
By the way - I am a champion for the cause here in Massachusetts - ask the state and local police, ahhhh my old friend, the Registry of Motor Vehicles, how they feel about me - took me a while to get it right, but now it's safe to say i have ZERO fear of saying what it was I arrived to say, sometimes that alone - catches them off guard.
most of the time, however, people lose traffic ticket appeals - and, most of the time, they were lying to weasel out of it. they didn't know; try principle!!!
"What a thing you are all teaching the youth. "Hey, I know you were doing wrong and the officer did his job, but just try and weasel your way out of it". Unbelievable"
. . . ohhh no you don't.
police are Peace Officers - originally they were supposed to respond to citizen complaints - think, violence.. threats.. disputes, before they escalate...
what you have here, traffic tickets, that is Law Enforcement. LAW ENFORCEMENT, which costs people CASH MONEY, and that fucking sucks
"What a thing you are all teaching the youth. "Hey, I know you were doing wrong and the officer did his job, but just try and weasel your way out of it". Unbelievable"
. . . ohhh no you don't.
police are Peace Officers - originally they were supposed to respond to citizen complaints - think, violence.. threats.. disputes, before they escalate...
what you have here, traffic tickets, that is Law Enforcement. LAW ENFORCEMENT, which costs people CASH MONEY, and that fucking sucks.
What a thing you are all teaching the youth. "Hey, I know you were doing wrong and the officer did his job, but just try and weasel your way out of it". Unbelievable
Hey I have a crazy concept........How about if you were speeding and got caught (as you admit you did) why not just "man up" and accept your punishment? Or does the constitution say that we should all be weasels and do whatever it takes to get out of whatever trouble we get into? Another thing...paying whatever fine/damages to whoever you hurt after you have crashed due to your speeding is a bit too late for the victims idiot. Thats why cops write speeding tickets, to make driver slow down
@shmoopify Please point to the section in the Constitution for the united States of America that says a STATE is or can be a damaged party. In order to be damaged you must have a just claim, a just claim is being able to prove loss or harm. How was the state, county, or city respectivly damaged? Where is their loss? If a human being is hurt by neg traveling then, and only then, is there a claim, by the injured party only, not a gov. Actuality precedes potentiality.
@anarchylogic - people like you will never get it. What i wrote was the reason cops write speeding tickets is to detour speeding. If cops didnt write those tickets, WAY more people would speed (knowing theres no penalty). If someone who is speeding because they know theres no penalty when normally they wouldnt knowing the cops could catch them, and they kill someone. Then the "claim" does that dead person no good does it?
@shmoopify If it were truly a horable crime then should there not be a more fitting punishment, like 100 hours comunity service? Why is there always money invluved? If Bill Gates gets a $1000 ticket its no big deal if a poor person gets a $1000 ticket it destroys them, whereas if Gates and the poor person have to spend 100 hours picking up trash on the road they are both equally punished are they not? Tickets are in the budget of most states and desired. Its a conflict of interest.
@anarchylogic - with your thought process, people should be able to go 100 mph through neighborhoods while kids play out front. As long as nobody gets hit, then no problem, right?
@shmoopify Correct. Having said that, a private insurance company could refuse to insure unsafe drivers w/o having any money involved for a noninjured party like the "state". A neighbor hood could post a speed limit on its streets and then bill the insurance co for the damages should a car (plate #) go terring ass threw a posted area. There is a better way then using the force of gov. In general I agree w/ you about being safe, but a better contract is needed then just demanding money.
@anarchylogic -thats how its been done for YEARS!!!!! Its a great way for the state to make money! But thats not its primary purpose. The primary purpose of ticket writing is to track the driving habits of bad drivers and when necessary, weed them out (ie...suspensions, or revoking the license). Insurance companies would go broke with your idea. Besides, what if no driver got insurance then? Or for that matter even bothered to go get a license...How would any of that be regulated/enforced?
Speed limits were made to try and prevent accidents. He says that if he caused any damage he would be happy to pay for it. Why not drive the speed limit, or close to it, and avoid accidents in the first place??? I hope his friends are all wealthy but choose to dress down, because if they seriously injure someone, and they don't have insurance, they are fucked. Finally, if there was no legitimate reason for the low speed limit, he would have mentioned it.
Insurance companies statistics show drivers who typically drive from 5-10 mph over the speed limit are safe drivers,but the irony is the same insurance companies donate these $900-$2000 radar guns to our local municipal police stations which are told to increase public safety quote on quote.Get radar detectors do some research and look out at the end of the month....the courts cannot handle a million claims on how they used a radar detector which alerted them 1/2 mile ahead,legal in 48 states.
@BenjaminPipic In his statement, he was not denying the fact he was speeding. In fact, he admitted it several times. His defense was built around the justification of his crime: (keeping up with traffic; the speed limit should be higher in that area; etc) He, in fact, did commit the crime, but he has taken the Libertarian view point to such an extreme as to be in defiance of all government and laws. He has offered no reason as to why he doesn't want to pay except his simple definace of the law.
There are circumstances. I once had to make an aggressive left turn to change lanes to avoid a car accident on the highway. I did not use a turn signals. Technically, I could've gotten a ticket for not using my turn signals. That ticket wouldn't stand in court though.
@BenjaminPipic That is obviously a situation that would have to be evaluated on its own merits. Unless Mr. Ryder could offer specific justification for his speed that would void his intent to break the law, the ticket is valid. And his attempts to fight the ticket undermine the Libertarian viewpoint. We are for small government and state rights over federal government. Not anti-laws and police, anarchy and rejection of valid and existing laws that the state has put forth.
@BenjaminPipic The only reason the case was thrown out is the officer mis-remembered the situation concerning this incident. Speed limits are not 'bad laws'. & just because u are against them doesn't make breaking them wrong. We have proper avenues for disgruntled citizens to voice complaints & room for change to happen. Change can't happen when we have citizens such as this guy refusing to abide by the law which has been established. He can't pick & choose which ones he will decide to follow.
Some speed limits are bad laws, certainly. Explain this...On I-95 in my part, the speed limit is 55MPH. To get off at an exit, the speed limit is 25MPH, in some parts I've seen it 15MPH because of a slope. So I could be getting off I-95 onto either exit well, I'm screwed; I can't drive 25 on I-95 because I'll get hit and I can't drive 55 on the exit because that's over the speed limit. So I technically just drove twice the speed limit. There's many traffic laws that are garbage.
@BenjaminPipic I don't see how you are screwed when the posted speed limit around a narrow turn is 25 or 15 mph. For the speed limit to be that low on an exit, the degree of a turn has to be past a certain point, which will make any speed exceeding that a dangerous speed. Otherwise, the speed will usually be 45 or 35 on an exit.
Also, I challenge you to start looking into ways you can help change laws, or vote people in who will represent you the way you want to be.
Most people drive well over the speed limit on those exits, so the turns aren't that narrow.
I know how the law process works. The only problem is, for every letter that I may write to a senator about some law, theres thousands of dollars in donations and gifts coming from some lobbyist to keep that law the way it is. And the constituents always get re-elected in this part. Oh and I cant run for any office myself because I don't have connections and 2-3 million dollars lying around.
"We have proper avenues for disgruntled citizens to voice complaints & room for change to happen."
Actually we do not. In the US, the distance between the ordinary citizen and the power structure is very large. We have ways of expressing complaints, such as in writing or protest, but we have no ways of seeing that those complaints are taken seriously.
"Change can't happen...established."
Sure it can. In fact that's the only way any change has every happened.
@BenjaminPipic Like it or not, we are a nation of laws. And as citizens, we must obey those laws. The constitution allows for state and federal laws, like it or not. Don't take your Libertarian view to such an extreme to think the founders meant for there to be no established law, or government. Libertarians often go to such an extreme to be anti any kind of law, and to use their belief to fit their life style of anti-authority. Speed limits don't impose on your personal liberty or freedom.
Yeah yeah play the "you're an anarchist libertarian" card all you want. I never said laws were bad, I said some laws were bad, and if people want to break them, that's good for them, I know I won't report them. Just because we have laws doesn't make them right. This nation was founded by a group of guys who were infamous for breaking laws. You seem to forget that America belonged to Britain before George Washington and co. decided to break away and separate.
Every citizen has a duty to resist if he feels he has been wronged. Especially these days where police are no longer honorable or truthful. Win or lose, he did the right thing and should be commended for it. Although, next time, wear some nicer clothes to improve your credibility in the courtroom. Sweat pants and an orange shirt that says "Football" just doesn't cut it.
Every citizen has a duty to resist if he feels he has been wronged. Especially these days where police are no longer honorable or truthful. Win or lose, he did the right thing and should be commended for it. Although, next time, wear some nicer clothes to improve your credibility in the courtroom. Sweat pants and an orange shirt that says "Football" just doesn't cut it.
These videos are ridiculous. We all have responsibilities, but it seems like you would rather avoid those responsibilities and instead put yourself in the spotlight and make a mockery of the courts.
I like your court apparel by the way.
Also, you admit to going 50 M.P.H. to the judge, but then think it's okay because your actions didn't cause harm to anyone. You were speeding, be responsible, pay the fine. Your speed COULD have caused an accident. It COULD have put someone in harms way.
@udilicious You are a tool, and are ignorant. You bent over to the law, just because they say you need to. The govt is just a bunch of people using words, you have a right and a privilege to use the very same words against them as well. study the law, they are wasting time and money to suck more money out of the citizen.
really people, you all make me ashamed to be from nh. NOT GUILTY, means INOCCENT, which means he did nothing wrong, and even if you didnt know that for some retarded reason, his body language alone would tell you he won the case.
The world bankers own you You are a stock, traded on the NYC exchange Stock Market trades your Birth Certificate and SS# on back of card. You are a Slave,how much are YOU worth? cafrman jordanmaxwell newpeopleorder infowars CampFEMA themuckraker freeworldfilmworks theheartlandusa thelibertyman clayandiron ruralsurvival arcticbeacon waragainsttheweak
I interviewed several harvard laywyers and one of the biggest weakness is lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction at the end of there closing. I move this court to Dismiss this charge for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The Officer attacking as an Attorney will not know how to respond. Nail to to a cross!!!!
"He's a trooper, you're not a trooper" from @06:55 in the first video cracks me up. Yeah: and because you don't work for the government, and everyone in this court DOES work for the government, you have no chance of a fair trial, unless you really know the law. It's called "Conflict of interest" LOL! Luckily, this guy DOES know the law, because Marc Stevens (youtube: beating civil traffic tickets) knows the law! LOL
wow...this kid is a fucking loser..you may not have hurt anyone but the purpose of speed laws is to insure that people getting hurt doesnt happen. you were speeding, therefore you risk hurting people, therefore you deserve a ticket. The officer was just doing his job, so stop being an annoying little NH townie and own up to what you did, and stop insulting the intelligence of the officers.
wow...this kid is a fucking loser..you may not have hurt anyone but the purpose of speed laws is to insure that people getting hurt doesnt happen. you were speeding, therefore you risk hurting people, therefore you deserve a ticket. The officer was just doing his job, so stop being an annoying little NH townie and own up to what you did, and stop insulting the intelligence of the officers.
wow...this kid is a fucking loser..you may not have hurt anyone but the purpose of speed laws is to insure that people getting hurt doesnt happen. you were speeding, therefore you risk hurting people, therefore you deserve a ticket. The officer was just doing his job, so stop being an annoying little NH townie and own up to what you did, and stop insulting the intelligence of the officers.
That's right. Once you've entered a plea, you've begged the court for its assistance, and you're under its jurisdiction. Even before that, if you signed a ticket and not made it clear that your signing was under protest, and you have not agreed to waive any rights by signing - you've entered into contract with the court. After that, you're pretty much at the mercy of the court.
Its about the name, when they call the name, on and for the record, I am the man who can sign and authorize for that legal entity, Im here for this matter, under threat and duress, there has been a mistake, I have not received ANY PROPER NOTICE. Im here to settle honorably, or on and for the record I accept your oath of office judge, am I entitled to a fair trial? (judge yes)can I get a fair trial if there is a conflict of interest? (Judge no)Who do you represent here judge? conflict , a problem
@drherbman Yeah right off the bat he contracted with the court. He could of likely ended this right away had he claimed his common law jurisdiction. Announced his lawful name. He should not have given consent to anything. I noticed he was attempting to exercise common law rights while failing to use his words correctly in order to keep himself within common law jurisdiction. Your right too, he attempted to find conflict of interest but went about it wrong. Practice makes perfect I guess.
Revenue agents?I know many police dont like to feed the quota..They dont want to enforce the code and step on our libertys..But so many have and do,so this is a good thing..The People come first,we are the royalty..If we dont like things we must stand against it..We should get on the jurys,post flyers,rebel,revolt,etc..Unite the many true red,white and blue americans and start changing things..The police need to stand with us,we pay them..Besides when the people rise,Nothing can or will stop us.
Ignorance of the law is no defense to violating the law. Just saying "Well I thought I was okay speeding." Doesn't give you the right to break the law. He flat admitted that he was probably traveling the speed the officer said he was. People need to take more responsibility for their actions instead of trying to weasel out of the consequences.
That had me on the edge of my seat, he almost captured the most important issue. When he questioned "if there was a complaint filed" But he didn't capitalize on it.
In order to have a corpus delicti a case requires a valid "cause of action." A valid cause of action requires three elements. 1) a violation of a legal right, 2) damage or injury, 3) redress-ability by the court.
If all three are not met, then the court has no standing, (a key component of subject mater jurisdiction)
I want to know if the speed limit 35 was posted where he could have seen it before being pulled over. If not he's good to go, since he testified that he was looking around and paying attention to what was going on.
@Jmfurcron42 Breaking the speed limit isn't a crime, it's a statutory violation. In order to be guilty of a crime, you have to break the law. There aren't any laws in any traffic acts, only statutes.
you are fucking pussy, i will spit on. you got negative one, and its not from me. by the way your mom did an exellent job on my cock, while you were polishing your nob at the computer.
@Jmfurcron42 Go to sleep sheep! you fucking moron. Don't you know you can say NO! to the assholes that try to run your fucking lousy life. Get a fucking grip on yourself and stop watching American Assholes..
This was great I am curious to see what comes of the case.
The only issue was that he did a good job of keeping the man from the name until the end when the judge says "Mr. Ryder if I send you mail will you get it \?" or something to that effect.
He acknowledged the name to himself.
So ridley report keep the train rolling and let us all know what happens with his
eat shit ass munch no body cares what u think any way
if you think that standing up for ur rights is idiotic then you must be the retard here
if you think that standing there noding with a smile on your face while you get ass raped by the state is ok then fine thats ur porogative but dont stand/ sit there taking the piss out of a perfectly reasonable political possition and then try u comment on what u think my interlect may be afer making a pissing spelling mistake. grow up think a ...
judge cares that u think he cant spell ??? no. fact is that in some cases there out to get money from u. now if ur a millionare then ya know fair enough u can spend a few 1000 of whatever currency you use, (not to say that its right)
but if ur joe blogs things like the police taking libberties with speed cameras start to take the piss and u have to stand up to um about it so.... i guess i can only derive from ur forma comment that ur a coward who would rather tap insults at a stranger...
You can't spell also. Are you slow? You must care if I make fun of retards who cant spell am I right? So are you the AKA a (What the hell is a winging bitch is that a bird? You dumb fuck.) Have a great day and go back to your trailer park.
so back to the real matter at hand. whats the deal en u dont like people that stand up 4 there rights? is that what ur saying?
i bet u wouldnt be such a dick if we where face to face !
oh and by the way im not native to the country that this video consurns but i activly encourang any one who will not be shat on, to stand ur for themselvs to any one that would put them down
bet ur prob one of them asshole traffic pigs that sits in his cruser eating donuts all day int ya??
You know, if the court accepts legal tender or credit for the payment of the fine, they do so in violation of their Consitution. How does that work IF they are a court of Law? Because you consent to let them by claiming you are a Person, not a man with Creator given rights. Think about it.
So did he have to pay the ticket still
MaddDogg81 5 days ago
loooooooooooooooooooseeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrssssssssssssss
montrealmountie 1 month ago
Were you speeding? Because the last time I checked, speeding is a crime and just as with every other crime, there is a punishment. I deeply appreciate you wasting tax payers money on this. Keep up the great work!
bowla5086 2 months ago
@bowla5086: how did he waste tax dollars? I'm not with their activist group, but simple observation... everyone regardless of the crime accused is given a court summons to appear. The dude wasnt in county lockup.. thats tax dollars... And the guy represented himself.. no public defender or tax dollars there.
bowla: you fail.
Paperclown 1 month ago
@Paperclown Court clerks & transcribers are paid hourly.. Not to mention keeping on the lights longer in the Court room wastes money.
Parknutzz 1 month ago
@Paperclown Time is money in the court system, you waste their time by not lying down and taking it. If you try to exercise your rights, they don't like it. It's just a money making scam. That's why we have 25% of the world prison population, but only 5% of the world population.
meeio442 3 weeks ago
@meeio442: oh they make plenty of money as it is alright on bs Disorderly Conduct charges that every city can slap on people for AnYTHInG and it is cheaper for people to lay down and take the charge than hire a defense attorney !!
Paperclown 3 weeks ago
@bowla5086 Yeah speeding is a crime, and that's the point, it's illegal, but it's not unlawful.
meeio442 1 month ago
@meeio442 Actually, in a court operating under the constitution of the United States, the state must prove "injury", i.e., who suffered damage, was endangered, or rights were violated by this man's actions? The officer lodged the only complaint and testified he was not harmed nor felt himself at risk. He perjured himself to boot. Case dismissed. Do not say "I know my rights!".... exercise them. Peace.
randytate 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bowla5086 Yeah speeding is a crime, and that's the point, it's illegal, but it's not unlawful.
meeio442 1 month ago
At the end, the group looks like they're from a "Trekkie Convention"
Weygandt 2 months ago
nice edit job. Bet u slow down and bet u paid ur ticket....
brittboyer1 2 months ago
We're all sheep! We're the ones who listen to ridiculous interpretations of the law that have no grounding in intelligent commentary and then watch videos with ads placed in them by the creator..oh WAIT that's you. Might I add that even if a speeding offence required the element of harm, it doesn't, the harm could easily be argued as potential. For isntance if i run around shooting a gun there is not necessarily a victim suffering harm but there could be if I am allowed to continue
michaeltbear 3 months ago
So, what ended up happening? I hope he didn't have to pay because the cop lied.
noobmaster31 3 months ago
next time i hope they plant stuff on your person
FishFingersNH 3 months ago
god bless you guys. the average ignorant person might not understand that you are also fighting for MY rights, and my family's rights as you do your brave work, but i do. and i thank you for it.
19caplin82 3 months ago
These people are a bunch of lunatics.
normanmj 5 months ago
This was great, keep kicking ass people.
BadassCeino 5 months ago 5
Since when is a cop a lawyer? Wow, they do whatever they want.
Germantunedcars 5 months ago
The highway concerned is indeed a speed trap and a fine collectors delight. it does go from 50 to 35 just like that...have to watch your ass especially if you are unfamiliar with that highway.
norseleague 5 months ago
If you read the state constitution, you are probably the ONLY ONE in the courtroom who has! You guys give me inspiration. Here in Maryland, they've used our state constitution for toilet paper at the Governor's Mansion. Our Gov and his ilk are openly aiding and abetting illegal aliens and PROUDLY operating in direct conflict to their Oaths of Office. FIGHT BACK.. it's the only thing that PRESERVES freedom.
DeathScouter 5 months ago 3
Your better argument would have been that you were not traveling at a rate of speed was unreasonable under the circumstances. Also, there was no evidence that the trooper was qualified to operate that radar or how he tested it was operating properly.
mikeknight4u 5 months ago
Even-dough you were successful, this is not the way to do it.
They ruled in your favor, but you were still on trial.
The goal is to prove that you are not under their jurisdiction.
You don't give them authority over you because you are not part of the law society.
Freedom of association.
Their rules don't apply to freeman on the land.
VeggiePower303 6 months ago
Props to this guy for resisting. Unfortunately he admitted under oath that he was exceeding the speed limit therefore guilty...
jaker277 6 months ago
Idiots, So we should be able to go as fast as we like until we kill someone. Real good argument.
TheEodtch 7 months ago
You have to attack the actual radar and just because someone is trained in it's use does not make him/her and expert. There are many questions I would have asked concerning this officers use of the radar "unit" For instance..just because someone might know how to turn on and play an X-Box, doesn't mean it can't malfunction. So the question becomes weather or not the cop fixes his own radar gun and how he can tell weather or not it's broken. Company x-prts won't come because of privacy prot laws.
snowfallzz 7 months ago
sounds like a waste of time. he'll get a fine for sure.
1111Davo1 7 months ago
Obey the law, Dammit!!!!
ffairlane57 7 months ago
@ffairlane57
When are GOV officials going to start obeying the law?
CSATexan 7 months ago
@CSATexan Never...
mrhnm 6 months ago
you should have requested the police tape from the officer's vehicle under the freedom of information act as part of you deffence . then the you could have the officer lying under oath
crackenuts 7 months ago
so what happened ???
yappertrap 7 months ago
Great way to look like a fool and waste the court's time. The cops may or may not be jerks. They may or may not be wrong. But the way this kid attempted to prove his innocence was ridiculous. It contained no legal defense(s) whatsoever. It was a social commentary that had no value whatsoever. Good job admitting guilt.
thisIsSomeShite 8 months ago
Are all freemen bad drivers? Just kidding...
dudewithopinion 8 months ago
I agree with a lot of the stuff you guys do, but ignorance is no excuse for the law. Pay the fine for speeding.
Highjak86 9 months ago
@Highjak86
Ignornance of the law is no excuse.
There are thousands of laws in the USA there is no way anyone on earth knows them all. The fact is that even a lawyer doesn't know all the laws
A quick search of silly laws came up with
In Pacific Groove, "molesting" butterflies can result in a $500 fine.
Would you pay the fine or go to court
CSATexan 8 months ago
@CSATexan I understand your point, but there are not signs posted on the sides of the road saying "Molesting Butterflies May Result in Fine". However, there are speed limit signs posted all over the roads. Don't play stupid with me. It's a simple fine. Man up.
Highjak86 8 months ago
@Highjak86
In other words you wouldn't pay the fine, you would fight it in court claiming that their were no signs and that you didn't know.
At which time the judge would say IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE.
I drive around small towns all the time. And they purposely have speed limit signs which make no sense other than to generate revenue.
CSATexan 8 months ago
@CSATexan No... in other words I'm not a butterfly molester. There are no signs saying murder is illegal either so your logic is complete crap. In most cases speed limits are in place to save lives.
Highjak86 8 months ago
@Highjak86
It would be the judgment call of the official if you molested the butterflies or not. I go camping all the time and do know a lot of the rules. Picking up a few sticks is not allowed this is made very clear to everyone.
But there is no way I would know if a certain plant or lizard is not to be molested. By molested they mean disturbed, killed, chased away etc etc etc.
CSATexan 8 months ago
@Highjak86
You say the signs are everywhere, sure in a big city they are. But the same does not apply to small towns who intentionally place signs where they are easily overlooked.
IE you are driving 70 MPH on the main interstate in West Texas it is 200 miles from ANYWHERE suddenly you go over a hill and on the other side it says 50 MPH and the cop is right there with a radar gun. GUESS WHAT???? You just got busted.
CSATexan 8 months ago
@CSATexan I grew up in a small town so I know what you mean. 1,100 people. I could see the officer being reasonable in this instance. However, traveling at that same rate of speed after the missing the sign because you were too busy talking on your phone is a different story.
Highjak86 8 months ago
@Highjak86
You do agree that if the person feels he was wrong he should take it to court.
I wouldn't fight the cop that is for sure. I wouldn't get into an argument with him.
But a person does have a right to question any law that he feels is wrong, which is what this dude did. He was driving along, I am sure he didn't know he was speeding and got a ticket which he felt he didn't deserve
CSATexan 8 months ago
@CSATexan Yes, I agree 100%. I also believe most people have a very skewed vision of what is "right" and what is "wrong". Which is where the judge comes in... and even then that person is still a human being. I was surprised to hear the verdict on the vid response to this. Thanks for the responses! It's good to have a conversation without someone turning it into a flame war.
Highjak86 8 months ago
@Highjak86
LOL You got me at a good time. So no flame war toight
I did notice that you listed The Catcher in the Rye as one of your favorite books. May I ask why??
I like the characters soliloquies they are without a doubt some of the best I have ever read.
CSATexan 8 months ago
@CSATexan Ha. I really don't know. I never read it in HS and I had the time to read it when I was overseas in Iraq so I figured I'd take the time to make myself less ignorant. It really is a depressing book and I guess at the time I really could relate to it. The line "I hunt people in this hat." killed me. I have a sick sense of humor I guess. I still love the book despite the criticism it gets from a lot of younger readers today.
Highjak86 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Highjak86
If you have a sick sense of humor ( I do too) you might enjoy reading the classic "A Confederacy of Dunces"
CSATexan 8 months ago
@Highjak86
Well I have to crash out, but nice chatting with ya. Hopefully chat with you again
CSATexan 8 months ago
good job, well done...
SilverShamrock71 9 months ago
Aww how sweet hes only lickle, he done amazin.. well done bach!!
TheMyVew 10 months ago
Is there a clear statute that states driving over the speed limit is illegal and subject to a fine? Someone please help explain how he had the balls to fight this and think he would win.
dblazesr 11 months ago
Smart move reading the constitution into evidence...
VerifiedNews 1 year ago 16
So basically what you people deffending the officers are saying is " That everyone is guilty until proven innocent! If you don't know your rights, you have no rights" And if you don't exercise your rights, you lose them!
southern8127 1 year ago 2
I'm not employed by any governmental agency (not in law enforcement...) -- but what I see here is you making a MOCKERY of the court. I applaud the judge for his patience and fairness.
Why don't you go after the IRS? Now THE INCOME TAX -- That's against the constitution.
msk7046 1 year ago
@msk7046 Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States..."
cycloudd 1 year ago
@cycloudd You could have also cited the 16th Amendment which says, "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
Amir883 10 months ago
@msk7046 The "MAGISTRATE" behaved Because he was being Filmed.
PORTUGAL1010 10 months ago 2
the fact that u participated in a trial, they got u, u gave them jurisdiction.. this court is not a real court, we must demand their delegation of authority certificate
muptahu24 1 year ago
speed limits are set in place for a reason. Although this guy didn't injure anyone like he mentioned it doesn't mean he couldn't on another day. This was standard procedure for a police officer to write this ticket and as a notice to him to slow the fuck down... I would be happy to know officers are looking out for the safety of all. Ignorant asshole this kid is.
kzaryckiproductions 1 year ago
@kzaryckiproductions If that reason is for the purpose of a speed trap, as it surely sounded to be by the testimonies, why should people not challenge that? By the constitution, we should.
7The7Green7 1 year ago
@kzaryckiproductions cops do whatever they want, get real with yourself.
sheetmetaldept10 1 year ago
@sheetmetaldept10 cops do what they want, but they have to answer to charges made against them, and it must be mde in a court that is equitable.. meaning, u cant file paper work in the same court that is trying u.. other than to start a paper trail.. to be used in a higher court
muptahu24 1 year ago
@kzaryckiproductions -- I'm GLAD to see someone other than me have some common freaking sense here. Good post, KZARYCKI
msk7046 1 year ago
@kzaryckiproductions You are an ignorant individual.
ihaveacar 1 year ago
Nice job Nick.
birdog45 1 year ago
you guys are fucking morons for letting the government push you around and control your life...stop hatein on us that run our own lives..only sheep consent to illegal searchs by the biggest gang in the US
420fury 1 year ago 20
The questions you asked were just dumb!, lol it was entertaining though.
mikemac871 1 year ago
Why go through all this crap? You could just claim common law. ;-) watch?v=RVxV9gJoHAE Granted, this is how the system will change.... and it needs to.
TrutherD1 1 year ago
The judge, the police, court clerk, are all employees of a corporation known as the state of New Hampshire. We are Tax Slaves to Corporations masquerading as governments. We don't own our property, we are "SERFS" on our property, the property is own by the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES, we pay rent in the form of property tax.
brainerdrebel 1 year ago
Its now the burden of the state to prove that the Police car was in fact stationary and not behind the defendants car. His defence will hold since it is protected by Constitutional rights.
Tzimnewman3 1 year ago
this is crap
verncurry 1 year ago
I find it hard to believe you won although good try. Supposedly they have to see you speed before using the gun. I KNOW they do not. If this cop had rear mounted radar and was sitting in his car facing the direction you were driving, how could he see you speeding as opposed to just looking at the radar and seeing a number? How did he measure your speed by looking at you pass other cars, did he know how fast the other cars were traveling? Did he use the gun on them for reference?
592220 1 year ago
By the way - I am a champion for the cause here in Massachusetts - ask the state and local police, ahhhh my old friend, the Registry of Motor Vehicles, how they feel about me - took me a while to get it right, but now it's safe to say i have ZERO fear of saying what it was I arrived to say, sometimes that alone - catches them off guard.
most of the time, however, people lose traffic ticket appeals - and, most of the time, they were lying to weasel out of it. they didn't know; try principle!!!
TheJoeJetta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"What a thing you are all teaching the youth. "Hey, I know you were doing wrong and the officer did his job, but just try and weasel your way out of it". Unbelievable"
. . . ohhh no you don't.
police are Peace Officers - originally they were supposed to respond to citizen complaints - think, violence.. threats.. disputes, before they escalate...
what you have here, traffic tickets, that is Law Enforcement. LAW ENFORCEMENT, which costs people CASH MONEY, and that fucking sucks
TheJoeJetta 1 year ago
"What a thing you are all teaching the youth. "Hey, I know you were doing wrong and the officer did his job, but just try and weasel your way out of it". Unbelievable"
. . . ohhh no you don't.
police are Peace Officers - originally they were supposed to respond to citizen complaints - think, violence.. threats.. disputes, before they escalate...
what you have here, traffic tickets, that is Law Enforcement. LAW ENFORCEMENT, which costs people CASH MONEY, and that fucking sucks.
TheJoeJetta 1 year ago
What a thing you are all teaching the youth. "Hey, I know you were doing wrong and the officer did his job, but just try and weasel your way out of it". Unbelievable
shmoopify 1 year ago
Hey I have a crazy concept........How about if you were speeding and got caught (as you admit you did) why not just "man up" and accept your punishment? Or does the constitution say that we should all be weasels and do whatever it takes to get out of whatever trouble we get into? Another thing...paying whatever fine/damages to whoever you hurt after you have crashed due to your speeding is a bit too late for the victims idiot. Thats why cops write speeding tickets, to make driver slow down
shmoopify 1 year ago
@shmoopify Please point to the section in the Constitution for the united States of America that says a STATE is or can be a damaged party. In order to be damaged you must have a just claim, a just claim is being able to prove loss or harm. How was the state, county, or city respectivly damaged? Where is their loss? If a human being is hurt by neg traveling then, and only then, is there a claim, by the injured party only, not a gov. Actuality precedes potentiality.
anarchylogic 1 year ago
@anarchylogic - people like you will never get it. What i wrote was the reason cops write speeding tickets is to detour speeding. If cops didnt write those tickets, WAY more people would speed (knowing theres no penalty). If someone who is speeding because they know theres no penalty when normally they wouldnt knowing the cops could catch them, and they kill someone. Then the "claim" does that dead person no good does it?
shmoopify 1 year ago
@shmoopify If it were truly a horable crime then should there not be a more fitting punishment, like 100 hours comunity service? Why is there always money invluved? If Bill Gates gets a $1000 ticket its no big deal if a poor person gets a $1000 ticket it destroys them, whereas if Gates and the poor person have to spend 100 hours picking up trash on the road they are both equally punished are they not? Tickets are in the budget of most states and desired. Its a conflict of interest.
anarchylogic 1 year ago
@anarchylogic - with your thought process, people should be able to go 100 mph through neighborhoods while kids play out front. As long as nobody gets hit, then no problem, right?
shmoopify 1 year ago
@shmoopify Correct. Having said that, a private insurance company could refuse to insure unsafe drivers w/o having any money involved for a noninjured party like the "state". A neighbor hood could post a speed limit on its streets and then bill the insurance co for the damages should a car (plate #) go terring ass threw a posted area. There is a better way then using the force of gov. In general I agree w/ you about being safe, but a better contract is needed then just demanding money.
anarchylogic 1 year ago
@anarchylogic -thats how its been done for YEARS!!!!! Its a great way for the state to make money! But thats not its primary purpose. The primary purpose of ticket writing is to track the driving habits of bad drivers and when necessary, weed them out (ie...suspensions, or revoking the license). Insurance companies would go broke with your idea. Besides, what if no driver got insurance then? Or for that matter even bothered to go get a license...How would any of that be regulated/enforced?
shmoopify 1 year ago
Great work dude Citizens Rule I wonder if I can use this in a ticket I got for a broken tail light and no insurance ?
mydailyfix 1 year ago
So, is the uniformed trooper standing at the prosecution table a licensed attorney? I'm not sure I understand his role.
secundiflora 1 year ago
Speed limits were made to try and prevent accidents. He says that if he caused any damage he would be happy to pay for it. Why not drive the speed limit, or close to it, and avoid accidents in the first place??? I hope his friends are all wealthy but choose to dress down, because if they seriously injure someone, and they don't have insurance, they are fucked. Finally, if there was no legitimate reason for the low speed limit, he would have mentioned it.
mapache11 1 year ago
Wow no one must have been playing world of war craft that day. Did they all carpool from the same trailer park?
zapazoid 1 year ago
Don't these people have jobs? How the hell can 20 + people go to their friend's court case in the middle of the day???
SB20330 1 year ago
A GREAT JOB ,...but i might add he needs to stop his mum cutting his hair ,it makes him look 12 years of age:)
kevrs2 1 year ago 2
Insurance companies statistics show drivers who typically drive from 5-10 mph over the speed limit are safe drivers,but the irony is the same insurance companies donate these $900-$2000 radar guns to our local municipal police stations which are told to increase public safety quote on quote.Get radar detectors do some research and look out at the end of the month....the courts cannot handle a million claims on how they used a radar detector which alerted them 1/2 mile ahead,legal in 48 states.
tonyhdz985 1 year ago
holy crap, just pay the freaking ticket you goon.
mizsoutiger 1 year ago
@mizsoutiger
Why should he pay a fine for something he didn't do? Would you like to pay his fine?
BenjaminPipic 1 year ago
@BenjaminPipic In his statement, he was not denying the fact he was speeding. In fact, he admitted it several times. His defense was built around the justification of his crime: (keeping up with traffic; the speed limit should be higher in that area; etc) He, in fact, did commit the crime, but he has taken the Libertarian view point to such an extreme as to be in defiance of all government and laws. He has offered no reason as to why he doesn't want to pay except his simple definace of the law.
mizsoutiger 1 year ago
@mizsoutiger
There are circumstances. I once had to make an aggressive left turn to change lanes to avoid a car accident on the highway. I did not use a turn signals. Technically, I could've gotten a ticket for not using my turn signals. That ticket wouldn't stand in court though.
BenjaminPipic 1 year ago
@BenjaminPipic That is obviously a situation that would have to be evaluated on its own merits. Unless Mr. Ryder could offer specific justification for his speed that would void his intent to break the law, the ticket is valid. And his attempts to fight the ticket undermine the Libertarian viewpoint. We are for small government and state rights over federal government. Not anti-laws and police, anarchy and rejection of valid and existing laws that the state has put forth.
mizsoutiger 1 year ago
@mizsoutiger
Apparently the judge didn't think so. The statutes are not written in black and white.
I am a Libertarian, I'm not against laws, I am against bad laws. If someone breaks a law that's not right, it doesn't bother me personally.
BenjaminPipic 1 year ago
@BenjaminPipic The only reason the case was thrown out is the officer mis-remembered the situation concerning this incident. Speed limits are not 'bad laws'. & just because u are against them doesn't make breaking them wrong. We have proper avenues for disgruntled citizens to voice complaints & room for change to happen. Change can't happen when we have citizens such as this guy refusing to abide by the law which has been established. He can't pick & choose which ones he will decide to follow.
mizsoutiger 1 year ago
@mizsoutiger
Some speed limits are bad laws, certainly. Explain this...On I-95 in my part, the speed limit is 55MPH. To get off at an exit, the speed limit is 25MPH, in some parts I've seen it 15MPH because of a slope. So I could be getting off I-95 onto either exit well, I'm screwed; I can't drive 25 on I-95 because I'll get hit and I can't drive 55 on the exit because that's over the speed limit. So I technically just drove twice the speed limit. There's many traffic laws that are garbage.
BenjaminPipic 1 year ago
@BenjaminPipic I don't see how you are screwed when the posted speed limit around a narrow turn is 25 or 15 mph. For the speed limit to be that low on an exit, the degree of a turn has to be past a certain point, which will make any speed exceeding that a dangerous speed. Otherwise, the speed will usually be 45 or 35 on an exit.
Also, I challenge you to start looking into ways you can help change laws, or vote people in who will represent you the way you want to be.
mizsoutiger 1 year ago
@mizsoutiger
Most people drive well over the speed limit on those exits, so the turns aren't that narrow.
I know how the law process works. The only problem is, for every letter that I may write to a senator about some law, theres thousands of dollars in donations and gifts coming from some lobbyist to keep that law the way it is. And the constituents always get re-elected in this part. Oh and I cant run for any office myself because I don't have connections and 2-3 million dollars lying around.
BenjaminPipic 1 year ago
@mizsoutiger
"We have proper avenues for disgruntled citizens to voice complaints & room for change to happen."
Actually we do not. In the US, the distance between the ordinary citizen and the power structure is very large. We have ways of expressing complaints, such as in writing or protest, but we have no ways of seeing that those complaints are taken seriously.
"Change can't happen...established."
Sure it can. In fact that's the only way any change has every happened.
BenjaminPipic 1 year ago
@BenjaminPipic Like it or not, we are a nation of laws. And as citizens, we must obey those laws. The constitution allows for state and federal laws, like it or not. Don't take your Libertarian view to such an extreme to think the founders meant for there to be no established law, or government. Libertarians often go to such an extreme to be anti any kind of law, and to use their belief to fit their life style of anti-authority. Speed limits don't impose on your personal liberty or freedom.
mizsoutiger 1 year ago
@mizsoutiger
Yeah yeah play the "you're an anarchist libertarian" card all you want. I never said laws were bad, I said some laws were bad, and if people want to break them, that's good for them, I know I won't report them. Just because we have laws doesn't make them right. This nation was founded by a group of guys who were infamous for breaking laws. You seem to forget that America belonged to Britain before George Washington and co. decided to break away and separate.
BenjaminPipic 1 year ago
I never got a ticket I didn't do something to get. If you don't pay it they will just arrest you and make you stay in jail that night.
Htown20XX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Every citizen has a duty to resist if he feels he has been wronged. Especially these days where police are no longer honorable or truthful. Win or lose, he did the right thing and should be commended for it. Although, next time, wear some nicer clothes to improve your credibility in the courtroom. Sweat pants and an orange shirt that says "Football" just doesn't cut it.
SlartyFartBlast 1 year ago
Every citizen has a duty to resist if he feels he has been wronged. Especially these days where police are no longer honorable or truthful. Win or lose, he did the right thing and should be commended for it. Although, next time, wear some nicer clothes to improve your credibility in the courtroom. Sweat pants and an orange shirt that says "Football" just doesn't cut it.
SlartyFartBlast 1 year ago
wow you guys are still sleeping if you think this changes anything.. the NWO is winning and you are losing..
mobspeak 1 year ago
These videos are ridiculous. We all have responsibilities, but it seems like you would rather avoid those responsibilities and instead put yourself in the spotlight and make a mockery of the courts.
I like your court apparel by the way.
Also, you admit to going 50 M.P.H. to the judge, but then think it's okay because your actions didn't cause harm to anyone. You were speeding, be responsible, pay the fine. Your speed COULD have caused an accident. It COULD have put someone in harms way.
udilicious 1 year ago
@udilicious You are a tool, and are ignorant. You bent over to the law, just because they say you need to. The govt is just a bunch of people using words, you have a right and a privilege to use the very same words against them as well. study the law, they are wasting time and money to suck more money out of the citizen.
guzboyron 1 year ago
idiots is this all they have to do in NH?
carl137 1 year ago
Good job brother!
coolerdoncooper 1 year ago
wake up people excercise your right and freedom
rath2am 1 year ago
really people, you all make me ashamed to be from nh. NOT GUILTY, means INOCCENT, which means he did nothing wrong, and even if you didnt know that for some retarded reason, his body language alone would tell you he won the case.
dakiller96711 1 year ago
@dakiller96711 NOT GUILTY DOES NOT MEAN INNOCENT. There is NO innocent plea in the CORPORATE court system. GUILTY or NOT GUILTY... that's it.
FossilRock 1 year ago
Good job and keep up the good work I will keep you in my mind,
UniqueleyCrazy 1 year ago
wait so what was the outcome? did he have to pay?
BowToMySkill 1 year ago
i applaud this guy for standing up not to many people will do the same and that's what the court counts on to get your money.
robinhoodintn1 1 year ago
A10spitfire1 1 year ago
so did he win or lose????
bakeingfoo22 1 year ago
I interviewed several harvard laywyers and one of the biggest weakness is lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction at the end of there closing. I move this court to Dismiss this charge for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The Officer attacking as an Attorney will not know how to respond. Nail to to a cross!!!!
brookwest 1 year ago
"He's a trooper, you're not a trooper" from @06:55 in the first video cracks me up. Yeah: and because you don't work for the government, and everyone in this court DOES work for the government, you have no chance of a fair trial, unless you really know the law. It's called "Conflict of interest" LOL! Luckily, this guy DOES know the law, because Marc Stevens (youtube: beating civil traffic tickets) knows the law! LOL
libertarianjury 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow...this kid is a fucking loser..you may not have hurt anyone but the purpose of speed laws is to insure that people getting hurt doesnt happen. you were speeding, therefore you risk hurting people, therefore you deserve a ticket. The officer was just doing his job, so stop being an annoying little NH townie and own up to what you did, and stop insulting the intelligence of the officers.
stl52789 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow...this kid is a fucking loser..you may not have hurt anyone but the purpose of speed laws is to insure that people getting hurt doesnt happen. you were speeding, therefore you risk hurting people, therefore you deserve a ticket. The officer was just doing his job, so stop being an annoying little NH townie and own up to what you did, and stop insulting the intelligence of the officers.
stl52789 1 year ago
wow...this kid is a fucking loser..you may not have hurt anyone but the purpose of speed laws is to insure that people getting hurt doesnt happen. you were speeding, therefore you risk hurting people, therefore you deserve a ticket. The officer was just doing his job, so stop being an annoying little NH townie and own up to what you did, and stop insulting the intelligence of the officers.
stl52789 1 year ago
That's right. Once you've entered a plea, you've begged the court for its assistance, and you're under its jurisdiction. Even before that, if you signed a ticket and not made it clear that your signing was under protest, and you have not agreed to waive any rights by signing - you've entered into contract with the court. After that, you're pretty much at the mercy of the court.
BloatedSensations 1 year ago
great stuff. i want to come down there and visit keene. hehe
swiftomatik 1 year ago
no everyone should exercise thier rights on principle
DeRocco21 1 year ago 31
So what happened next?
FCKEVRY1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What the fuck is this?
Fucking pay your ticket you limp wristed faggot
SkInHoUnD 2 years ago
And when you're done sucking up, do the cops let you suck their penises at the end of the day?
FCKEVRY1 2 years ago 10
Sorry faggot, if your looking for cock sucking tube, you can find that in your moms dvd collection
SkInHoUnD 2 years ago
Why would I go to my mom's DVD collection when I can just go to your mom and get my dick sucked?
FCKEVRY1 2 years ago 2
@SkInHoUnD well paying your ticket with no lawful reason to do so is almost like sucking their dick. Do you suck dick willingly?
brettdusek 1 year ago
Its about the name, when they call the name, on and for the record, I am the man who can sign and authorize for that legal entity, Im here for this matter, under threat and duress, there has been a mistake, I have not received ANY PROPER NOTICE. Im here to settle honorably, or on and for the record I accept your oath of office judge, am I entitled to a fair trial? (judge yes)can I get a fair trial if there is a conflict of interest? (Judge no)Who do you represent here judge? conflict , a problem
drherbman 2 years ago
@drherbman Yeah right off the bat he contracted with the court. He could of likely ended this right away had he claimed his common law jurisdiction. Announced his lawful name. He should not have given consent to anything. I noticed he was attempting to exercise common law rights while failing to use his words correctly in order to keep himself within common law jurisdiction. Your right too, he attempted to find conflict of interest but went about it wrong. Practice makes perfect I guess.
Suge212 2 years ago
hihh nope Good practice makes perfect.
Cause he did his home work on what he was about to say even wrote down some
but like you said didn't go about it good.
i think for all of us that know law or try to lurn law focus on knowing your common law rights
and paperwork
shalowm
tightladyshy 1 year ago
Revenue agents?I know many police dont like to feed the quota..They dont want to enforce the code and step on our libertys..But so many have and do,so this is a good thing..The People come first,we are the royalty..If we dont like things we must stand against it..We should get on the jurys,post flyers,rebel,revolt,etc..Unite the many true red,white and blue americans and start changing things..The police need to stand with us,we pay them..Besides when the people rise,Nothing can or will stop us.
mikeemike11 2 years ago
Ignorance of the law is no defense to violating the law. Just saying "Well I thought I was okay speeding." Doesn't give you the right to break the law. He flat admitted that he was probably traveling the speed the officer said he was. People need to take more responsibility for their actions instead of trying to weasel out of the consequences.
drbirchett 2 years ago
That had me on the edge of my seat, he almost captured the most important issue. When he questioned "if there was a complaint filed" But he didn't capitalize on it.
In order to have a corpus delicti a case requires a valid "cause of action." A valid cause of action requires three elements. 1) a violation of a legal right, 2) damage or injury, 3) redress-ability by the court.
If all three are not met, then the court has no standing, (a key component of subject mater jurisdiction)
gmcmudder1 2 years ago
I want to know if the speed limit 35 was posted where he could have seen it before being pulled over. If not he's good to go, since he testified that he was looking around and paying attention to what was going on.
bhannig 2 years ago
So, give us an update! What was in the letter???
TokDiYel 2 years ago
They call this the land of the Free LOL you are more enslaved than the people of North Korea.
Why are you obeying these corporate judges? Statutes are not Laws they are the regulated rules of society made by those who wish to enslave you.
Do not obey the judge challenge their jurisdiction over you you need to read up on the Freeman Movement and get yourselves EMPOWERED.
whitenightf3 2 years ago
Power to the people!...right now!
usergently 2 years ago
you did the crime and were ticketed like you should have been. Pay the fine for breaking the law its that simple.
Jmfurcron42 2 years ago
@Jmfurcron42 Breaking the speed limit isn't a crime, it's a statutory violation. In order to be guilty of a crime, you have to break the law. There aren't any laws in any traffic acts, only statutes.
BloatedSensations 2 years ago
go suck monkeys dick you are fucking SLAVE
bykashka75 2 years ago
great comeback dumb fuck did you make that one up in your 5th grade class or did your mom tell you that one?
Jmfurcron42 2 years ago
you are fucking pussy, i will spit on. you got negative one, and its not from me. by the way your mom did an exellent job on my cock, while you were polishing your nob at the computer.
bykashka75 2 years ago
How are you going to spit on me? you dont know where I live. You sir are an ignorant fool go get a job dead beat.
Jmfurcron42 2 years ago
yep, thats right polisher
bykashka75 2 years ago
@Jmfurcron42 Go to sleep sheep! you fucking moron. Don't you know you can say NO! to the assholes that try to run your fucking lousy life. Get a fucking grip on yourself and stop watching American Assholes..
usergently 2 years ago
I am American you fucktard.
Jmfurcron42 2 years ago
@Jmfurcron42 Well, all is said!
usergently 2 years ago
kid, ur a panzy. just pay the ticket and stop kissin ass.
gocolts1490 2 years ago
This was great I am curious to see what comes of the case.
The only issue was that he did a good job of keeping the man from the name until the end when the judge says "Mr. Ryder if I send you mail will you get it \?" or something to that effect.
He acknowledged the name to himself.
So ridley report keep the train rolling and let us all know what happens with his
Truth and Understanding
threeg5 2 years ago
Poor defense, because you admitted the speed you were driving at.
Individualism101 2 years ago 3
only thing i didnt like....the ad at the beginning
badbegin.ning....?sounds terrible
THUMPBUMPDUDE 2 years ago 3
Well judging by the age most start that could be quite young so i dont know what thats supposed to meen ?
Oh... sorry i was supposed to be offendedand wright some angry comment in return ?
urm yes u smell.
Ah ha take that!!
I thought id keep it on the same level and all coz its sorta dropping into pre pubestant mom jokes an so on..
any thing else u wana show ur mental age with?
Most retards now start heading in the direction of paragraphs of garbled swear words.
soo...??
jnewbon00 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are a fucking retard.
iworkwithdeadppl 2 years ago
Comment removed
iworkwithdeadppl 2 years ago
WHO?
thats quite an open ended statment
jnewbon00 2 years ago
This is how you spell statement. You fucking retard. I guess who i am talking about is you.
iworkwithdeadppl 2 years ago
eat shit ass munch no body cares what u think any way
if you think that standing up for ur rights is idiotic then you must be the retard here
if you think that standing there noding with a smile on your face while you get ass raped by the state is ok then fine thats ur porogative but dont stand/ sit there taking the piss out of a perfectly reasonable political possition and then try u comment on what u think my interlect may be afer making a pissing spelling mistake. grow up think a ...
jnewbon00 2 years ago
judge cares that u think he cant spell ??? no. fact is that in some cases there out to get money from u. now if ur a millionare then ya know fair enough u can spend a few 1000 of whatever currency you use, (not to say that its right)
but if ur joe blogs things like the police taking libberties with speed cameras start to take the piss and u have to stand up to um about it so.... i guess i can only derive from ur forma comment that ur a coward who would rather tap insults at a stranger...
jnewbon00 2 years ago
than stand up to oppressive forces in there life. AKA a winging bitch
jnewbon00 2 years ago
You can't spell also. Are you slow? You must care if I make fun of retards who cant spell am I right? So are you the AKA a (What the hell is a winging bitch is that a bird? You dumb fuck.) Have a great day and go back to your trailer park.
iworkwithdeadppl 2 years ago
so sad :(
so back to the real matter at hand. whats the deal en u dont like people that stand up 4 there rights? is that what ur saying?
i bet u wouldnt be such a dick if we where face to face !
oh and by the way im not native to the country that this video consurns but i activly encourang any one who will not be shat on, to stand ur for themselvs to any one that would put them down
bet ur prob one of them asshole traffic pigs that sits in his cruser eating donuts all day int ya??
jnewbon00 2 years ago
Face to face anytime bitch boy. No I do not sit in a cop car eating. However I do fuck your mother. Learn how to spell retard.
iworkwithdeadppl 2 years ago
lame lame lame !
how old are you ? 5-6 ??
jnewbon00 2 years ago
I am old enough to bang your mom.
iworkwithdeadppl 2 years ago
oooo Niceeeee.
msheale0 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Get a job or something and you retards wont have so much time on your hands.
iworkwithdeadppl 2 years ago
You know, if the court accepts legal tender or credit for the payment of the fine, they do so in violation of their Consitution. How does that work IF they are a court of Law? Because you consent to let them by claiming you are a Person, not a man with Creator given rights. Think about it.
marshallone 2 years ago