ID is not science, but it is a PLAUSIBLE explanation for the observed design in biology, atleast temporarily until a proper explanation (if ever any) can explain to account for the observed design in molecular bio, biochem and even organic chem...
I don't see any design but you might and just like other mythology creation myths it's religion because it's nothing more than a belief with zero evidence, logic or scientific testing. It's only plausible because you have an interest in god being true.
Thats cuz u never opened a biology textbook....A human cell is a million times more complex than the computer you are sitting infront of....If thats not design, I don't know what is....Even Richard Dawkins admitted "you may find evidence for ID in the fields of molecular biology and BioChemistry..." and you know why he said that? becuz he opened and studied these textbooks..Its only implausible for you becuz you don't want there to be god being true...
@unimind24 , I was pretty lucky to get a B in biology in college then I guess. A human cell is intricate but a computer is man made, that is the difference. One is only as good as the guy who makes the pc but the other has taken millions of years to get to this point. You don't know what design is. I'm sure like all theists you are taking Dawkins out of context and he did say "may which means you "may" also find santa created each cell. I did want god, I got educated and found he's imaginary
Thats cuz u never opened a biology textbook....A human cell is a million times more complex than the computer you are sitting infront of....If thats not design, I don't know what is....Even Richard Dawkins admitted "you may find evidence for ID in the fields of molecular biology and BioChemistry..." and you know why he said that? becuz he opened and studied these textbooks..Its only implausible for you becuz you don't want there to be god being true...
Thats cuz u never opened a biology textbook....A human cell is a million times more complex than the computer you are sitting infront of....If thats not design, I don't know what is....Even Richard Dawkins admitted "you may find evidence for ID in the fields of molecular biology and BioChemistry..." and you know why he said that? becuz he opened and studied these textbooks..Its only implausible for you becuz you don't want there to be god being true...
WHAT HAPPENED TO BEN STEIN'S ACTING CAREER IN HOLLYWOOD? IT WAS LUMINOUS IN THE 90'S!
DeepSetEyesDance 2 months ago
Noo...
Zimnyification 1 year ago
I hate both these morons. I just canceled my Comcast over it.
ThreeLeggedBandit 1 year ago 2
I've never seen Ben Stein break out of monotone before.
8523metalhead 1 year ago
lolz,omg
MzJollett 1 year ago
this is so painful to watch
tantalides 1 year ago
Shaq is hilarious and overcomes Stein's bad rep and lame jokes. But I'm still not getting Comcast.
DissidentIV 2 years ago
If Ben was the smartest he know ID isn't science.
TXatheist 2 years ago
and for that i will never buy comcast in my life. because an idiot is suggesting it who is shown as smart.
EdgeRatedR007 2 years ago
ID is not science, but it is a PLAUSIBLE explanation for the observed design in biology, atleast temporarily until a proper explanation (if ever any) can explain to account for the observed design in molecular bio, biochem and even organic chem...
unimind24 1 year ago
I don't see any design but you might and just like other mythology creation myths it's religion because it's nothing more than a belief with zero evidence, logic or scientific testing. It's only plausible because you have an interest in god being true.
TXatheist 1 year ago
TXatheist
"I don't see any design..."
Thats cuz u never opened a biology textbook....A human cell is a million times more complex than the computer you are sitting infront of....If thats not design, I don't know what is....Even Richard Dawkins admitted "you may find evidence for ID in the fields of molecular biology and BioChemistry..." and you know why he said that? becuz he opened and studied these textbooks..Its only implausible for you becuz you don't want there to be god being true...
unimind24 1 year ago
@unimind24 , I was pretty lucky to get a B in biology in college then I guess. A human cell is intricate but a computer is man made, that is the difference. One is only as good as the guy who makes the pc but the other has taken millions of years to get to this point. You don't know what design is. I'm sure like all theists you are taking Dawkins out of context and he did say "may which means you "may" also find santa created each cell. I did want god, I got educated and found he's imaginary
TXatheist 1 year ago
@TXatheist
There is no point arguing with you, its the same as arguing with a muslim fundamentalist.
unimind24 1 year ago
@unimind24 In other words your pride is over-rated and your ability to make a valid case for ID is non-existent. Good choice to bow out
TXatheist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@unimind24 In other words your pride is over-rated and your ability to make a valid case for ID is non-existent. Good choice to bow out
TXatheist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@unimind24 In other words your pride is over-rated and your ability to make a valid case for ID is non-existent. Good choice to bow out
TXatheist 1 year ago
TXatheist
"I don't see any design..."
Thats cuz u never opened a biology textbook....A human cell is a million times more complex than the computer you are sitting infront of....If thats not design, I don't know what is....Even Richard Dawkins admitted "you may find evidence for ID in the fields of molecular biology and BioChemistry..." and you know why he said that? becuz he opened and studied these textbooks..Its only implausible for you becuz you don't want there to be god being true...
unimind24 1 year ago
TXatheist
"I don't see any design..."
Thats cuz u never opened a biology textbook....A human cell is a million times more complex than the computer you are sitting infront of....If thats not design, I don't know what is....Even Richard Dawkins admitted "you may find evidence for ID in the fields of molecular biology and BioChemistry..." and you know why he said that? becuz he opened and studied these textbooks..Its only implausible for you becuz you don't want there to be god being true...
unimind24 1 year ago
Ben Stein is a moron.
FreePlay 2 years ago
That was hot
meowdragon 2 years ago
@meowdragon LOOOOL!!!
DeepSetEyesDance 2 months ago