"Teabagger" Is Oxford's 2nd Most Popular Word Of The Year!

[IoEstasCedonta]

@cinnamon69lesbico Their level being *lying*? No. The many you can't convince with the truth, you can't convince with lies or insults, either, and the few you can convince with the truth, you may be able to convince more easily with lies, but you'll never convince with insults. Lies and insults are for people whose stances are either subjective, or else objectively wrong, and that's the message they send.

[cinnamon69lesbico]

@IoEstasCedonta Anyway I am done with you, there is no need to respond to me.

[IoEstasCedonta]

@cinnamon69lesbico Fair enough.

But to anyone else, this is a very dangerous road this person is going down. Even - *especially* - if you're objectively right, screaming over screaming idiots just pushes the focus further from being reasonable to being loud, and keep in mind that there's little louder than the gun.

[cinnamon69lesbico]

@IoEstasCedonta Just ge the fuck ouit mof my face alreay you stupid motherfucker. You goddamn teabaggers and teabag sympathizers need to fucking hget a dose of reality if you thionk I am goinjg to go easy on u for one goddamn minute. & For you loEstasCedon: No envía mensajes a mí! Entender?

[cinnamon69lesbico]

@IoEstasCedonta Motherfucker, WE have GUNS too you stupid TINY FLACCID PENIS. Who has to jerk off and get a hard on just to make it look like there's something in your trousers.

Do you think yu scare me? Shut the fuck up.

[IoEstasCedonta]

@cinnamon69lesbico Exactly. You have guns.

[cinnamon69lesbico]

@IoEstasCedonta I did not write that I have a gun...I wrote that "WE" hav\e guns just like those teabaggin'motherfuckers. Now why won't you gp away?

[IoEstasCedonta]

@cinnamon69lesbico Because the fact that you're going to the "rally to restore sanity" scares the hell out of me.

[cinnamon69lesbico]

@IoEstasCedonta Oh and you are certain that I am going to rally? You have my itinerary?

U know ALL ABOUT ME? RIGHT? i SHOULD BE SCARED TO HELL OF U! STALKER. You are freaking unbelievable, this is You Tube!

What the hell is wrong with you? Everyone on You Tube can be profane but me, because I scare you. In that case you need to be scared of every single person you relentlessly write to after they've REPEATEDLY asked u to stop asshole. Learn BOUNDARIES. The you'll be safe.

[IoEstasCedonta]

@cinnamon69lesbico It's on your profile. I usually check the profile when someone gets personal.

This is a comments thread, not a PM exchange. I won't vanish at your command, let alone after direct attacks, and the fact that you expect me to and imply you're entitled to as much is what scares me, especially when you're going to a rally against your own kind of thinking. Who gives a fuck about profanity?

But I will stop responding to your comments, and unlike you, I mean that when I say it.

[cinnamon69lesbico]

@IoEstasCedonta As I previously wrote: You are a stalker and there is NOTHING on my profile or either of my blogs that specifically states what my whereabouts will be on October 30,2010. It's my right to advertise anything I choose to STALKER, and if I ask you to NOT respond to me, well I don't care what kind of service this is. I ASKED you SEVERAL Times not to write to me. U claim to be scared of me at a rally that will have 70,000 to 100,000 or more participants. Give Me A Break STALKER.

[IoEstasCedonta]

"Unintentionally"? "Cluelessly"?

Keith, you are spreading unfounded and unlikely statements to insult your opponents. Don't.

[cinnamon69lesbico]

@IoEstasCedonta So they "Intentionally" want to refer to themselves as a metaphor for dipping one's Balls into a person's mouth? You apparently PROVE the teabaggers Cluelessness.

When the teabagger's stop with their unfounded and unlikely statements about the president then you can expect the same in return. You fucking kill me with you whining. Shut The Fuck Up.

[IoEstasCedonta]

@cinnamon69lesbico Yeah. They do. It's an act of dominance. For instance, "teabag the Dems before they teabag you" - is there any other way that makes sense?

...as for "unfounded and unlikely statements about the president"... no argument. But it's no reason to stoop to that level.

[AbuGrabIt]

Keith, my woman, you can celebrate a nickname since you're just like that mean kid who hates everyone who follows rules and works hard...you know, those who don't need a curve to pass. We conservatives will celebrate your Democrats being screwed out of office in November...and...that's screwed dry. Not even some spittle. Barry Hussein will be one very lonely Democrat...much like the relationship that MSNBC has with the Nielson Ratings. PS You guys have it soooo wrong! Hahaha.

[AbuGrabIt]

That's odd. Keith Olderwomman, a douche-bagger, using the term teabagger. Keithy you're a douche-bagger, douche-bagger, douche-bagger,...I tell you. Fucking moron.

[dmc967]

the teabaggers are about the most hilarious thing in politics since Sarah Palin.

What a golden age for the comedy of right wing politics

loved how they became "tea partiers" as time wore on eh? lol I don't know bout you guys but Im still going to call them teabaggers because its way funnier and it will be so ironic when the incumbents they so hated flourish due to the tea parties' rhetoric. It will divide the right wing and people will pick moderate dems before rush limbaugh republicans

[DragonWind524]

The teabaggers were endoursed by dick army and jerome pussy. Steven anuslicker announced that former congress canidate Ron scrotumhead will step down and let governer William P. Nisface take charge.

[dropkickglobalism]

Yeah, don't actually refute anything that a large portion of the country is enraged about, just giggle to yourself about 7th grade innuendos. Fuck I hate this guy.

[ClaudeParish]

K.O. loves teabagging. Testicles gently rubbed over his lips and a love gun inserted in his mouth until it unleashes its salty load into his yearning love/pie hole! Richard Wolffe looks anxious for his turn! Annals, Dick? Orals, actually! Take you 'hard' book and sit on it, dear.

[xadam2dudex]

these people are just so stupid.. their ability to look beyond the propaganda they are fed by FOX fake news, Rush Limburger and the like..if they had 2 brain cells to rub together they would have the possibility of understanding reality

[greshamweed]

"Limburger"!! HAHAHA!!! Your so fucking funny!!! I bet your proud!!! I bet you'd suck on K.O.'s limp dick you sausage choker!!

[xadam2dudex]

great comeback fool.. u right wingnuts are a sorry bunch of morons..u deserve what u get.. the only problem is u will be kicking and screaming and dragging everyone else down with ur stupid asses

[logansGT]

Keith Dobermann knows all about teabagging.....ever notice how he looks at the other REAL teabagger, Barney Frank?

[jokerHIGHT]

teabagger is so important topic to report on really get some real news on please

[InvestigatorDave]

The term is Tea Party. I know that Keith just loves to use the adolesent boy dirty word, but it is wrong. If he was confused about that, all he had to do was look at the clips he ran. One of them had, as a graphic on the screen: "Tea Party".

[bollo3000]

Dude it's been defined as Teabagger by Oxford University Press, they can't rebrand their way out of this one.

[InvestigatorDave]

Bollo:

1st, at the age of 35 and being from UK, you really should not be talking like an 18 yr old surfer from SoCal. ("Dude"? And you want to be taken seriously?)

2nd, The members of the movement do not call themselves that, and have already "branded" themselves as Tea Partiers. The "re-branding" or "incorrect labeling" done by OUP notwithstanding.

[bollo3000]

1) I talk like I talk, you don't have to like it.

2) The members of the movement used the term teabag a lot more in the early days before the were mocked so much, and use teabags as their symbol - so what to they expect? And it's particularily apt, given that their main objective is to shove their sweaty ol' balls of corporate funded misinformation down our throats.

[bollo3000]

ps srry about my shit-arse typing there...

[InvestigatorDave]

The members of the movement DID NOT refer to themselves by that moniker in the beginning or at other times. Perhaps if you lived here, you'd know that. The movement was a TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party on 4/15 (tax day) reminiscent of the Boston Tea Party protest from the 1700s. Even the clip KO used shows the graphic "Tea Party" in it. A teabag is a modern packaging of tea, and makes sense from the Tea Party perspective. You seem to be as immature as Keith.

[bollo3000]

/watch?v=-xrxGd7sKNE

Anyway the term has stuck so they might as well embrace it.

The sad side of all this is that the people who support this movement have been conned by the corporate propoganda machine to act against their own interests. They're usually completely misinformed about policy, still believe in death panels, and even think that 'czars' represent some kind of communist takeover.

[InvestigatorDave]

The term has not stuck, except with you, Keith, and the rest of the MSNBC crowd.

You clearly have no knowledge of this movement based upon your comments. Well, no knowledge that was not supplied by MSNBC et al. Just in case you do, please explain:

1. Which corp prop machine conned these people?

2. What did it con them to do?

3. How do those interests work against self interest of Tea Partiers?

4. Evidence they are misinformed about policy.

I await your reply.

[bollo3000]

1) The entire health insurance industry. Americans For Prosperity for eg.

2) To fight for the interests of corporations and the rich.

3) Let's break this down - a) rich white people: ok, they probably benefit from letting other Americans suffer, b) poor white people: protesting against healthcare which might save their lives c) non-white people: hmmm, don't see many of them at TeaBag events do we?

4) Just look up 'teabaggers' on youtube for plenty of humorous examples, eg watch?v=zeN0JRFGPD0.

[InvestigatorDave]

1. You don't believe these people reached own conclusions on own after research? Why? BTW, not all protests against Obamacare - began w/protest agains Stim Bill.

2. Freedom, limited gov't, controlled spending are in everyone's interest. That is the basis.

3. Again, what they want benefits all.

4. And those few respresent the whole? You don't suppose someone with an agenda sought the few out do you? Which would also explain why you don't see as many minorities as you require.

[bollo3000]

Watching Glenn Beck dn't constitute research - if they did a bit more research they wouldn't be so misinformed.

America obviously needs universal healthcare. The stimulus bill is Obama's effort to pull America out of the steaming pile of shit Bush left the economy in, I don't know whether it's the best solution but they type of hate filled language used by the protestors definitely doesn't contribute to the debate.

I don't require minorities, just pointing out that they are under represented.

[InvestigatorDave]

What evidence do you have that they get all their info from GB?

What evidence do you have that they are misinformed? Especially relative to their reasons for protesting.

Why does the U.S. "need" Obamacare?

Obama's effort with StimBill was a failure, or do you see it as a success? We're worse now than when Obama took over.

Most protestor language not hate-filled.

Minorities, BY DEFINITION, are small % of any group, bollo.

[bollo3000]

Obviously they don't get ALL their info from GB, but the fact that he had his very own 912 protest and the placards at other ones along the lines of "thank god for Glen Beck" show that a huge number of these people are influenced by and trust this moron.

A minority is not by definition a small % of any group. There are 13.4% African Americans in the US, I haven't seen any tea party protests with anything like the more than 1 in 10 you'd expect if this was a cross section of American society.

[InvestigatorDave]

You seem to be confusing the GB 9*12 event with the Tea Parties. Can you pick just one for discussion?

So you now retract that they do their research by watching GB? And just why is he a "moron"?

Are you arguing that a minority is a large % of any group?  That defies logic. And BTW, 1 in 10 is 10%. Which is nearly 13%. So what's your beef?

[bollo3000]

Look up 912 on youtube and you'll see most of the results mention tea party in the description - it's all part of the same sack of manure.

I don't retract anything, most of these people are clearly influenced by the lies of GB and similar idiots, it doesn't mean they get all their information from them.

I'm not going to get into explaining all the reasons why GB is a moron, that would take to long and if you've watched his show it should be self evident.

[InvestigatorDave]

There are similar concerns within the two groups (9*12 and Tea Party), but they are different. If YOU looked at the principles/values on the actual 9*12 site, you'd have a hard time call it "manure", but it is just easier to denegrate than reason, isn't it?

I have watched GB's show, which is why I've asked you why you believe him to be a moron and liar. Guess that's asking too much, huh?

[bollo3000]

There's plenty of serious criticism of Glenn Beck which makes it hard to believe anyone would trust him, but I think the recent South Park episode with Cartman as GB does a great job of exposing his tactics.

The principles are drivel. For example, "1) America Is Good" - buys into that blind patriotism Americans are afflicted with, and is totally meaningless. America as some good things about it and some bad things about it, like any other country. It does a lot of bad things in the world.

[InvestigatorDave]

And to think I was having a serious debate with a reasonable person. Then, you cite your source of information regarding Glenn Beck as "South Park".

Come back when you have some real information and facts to back up your claims.

[bollo3000]

The point is that Glenn Beck isn't a person to be taken seriously, and the fat bloated meglomaniac idiot Eric Cartman is an ideal person to represent him.

[InvestigatorDave]

You have yet to offer ANY facts or evidence to support your claims that Beck is a moron, and idiot, or that he should not be taken seriously. You just keep pounding that drum without facts to support.

BTW, Eric Cartman is NOT "an ideal person to represent him". Eric Cartman is a CARTOON character. Eric Cartman is NOT a person.

[ninjapirate0507]

@InvestigatorDave Really? Eric Cartman is not a real person? Say it ain't so!!! lolz Glenn Beck IS an idiot, and anyone who does take him seriously needs to get their head checked. Call your shrink.

[InvestigatorDave]

Rather than attack the man with ad hom attacks, and those who are in his audience, why not try to attack his arguments with facts? No question that it is harder to do, but it brings credibility to any comments you make. For instance:

1. Why is GB an idiot in your opinion?

2. Why does anyone who takes GB seriously need to "get their head checked"?

3. What makes you think I have a shrink, and why would I call him?

[bollo3000]

It's you that has a problem with logic and reading comprehension. I'm not saying that a minority IS a large percentage, but it CAN be a large percentage which is less than the majority. Look up the definition. I said there ARE NOT anywhere near 1 in 10 black people in those crowds (it's hard to find any).

[InvestigatorDave]

MSNBC found one outside of a town hall meeting. He was carrying a legally owned and registered semi-auto rifle. They said there were dangerous white guys out there at the town hall meeting, all the while having the camera zoomed in on the rifle.

In fact, other camera angles provided by other networks showed the guy to be black. MSNBC kind fudged that "fact" too.

Still, how many minorities are required to give a movement legitimacy?

[bollo3000]

If it's the one I'm thinking of there was at least one white guy with a gun as well as the black guy. But what's one black guy with a gun got to do with overall representation of minorities?

I don't "require" any number of minorities, I'm just saying that if they're not present in numbers roughly proportional to society as a whole it's quite likely that the movement does not represent the interests of a cross section of society.

[InvestigatorDave]

Do you know how things work in a republic such as the U.S.?

A candidate has to convince the majority of the voters in a state to vote for him. Then the candidate gets the seat, or delegates depending. The candidate does not necessarily have to convince any predetermined cross section --- just the majority of those who vote. This movement is a large group of people -- who vote. Whether they rep any predetermined cross section is immaterial. Mocking and ignoring them is political suicide.

[bollo3000]

I thought this was about what the people want, not about someone trying to get elected and giving the one finger salute to everyone who didn't vote for them.

[InvestigatorDave]

Hey genius:

The movement is to get politicians to behave appropriately and to act on the will of the people. To represent the people. These are motivated people, and for the most part, they are voters. The politicians will heed their wishes, or will lose at the polls next time around. What did you think was going on here? How naive are you?

[bollo3000]

I understand that, but I can only hope that politicians realise that these people don't represent the general views of the electorate, many of whom abhor what the teabaggers are doing & also vote.

[InvestigatorDave]

If these people command a majority of the electorate, then they most certainly DO represent the general views fo the electorate.

Only time will tell if the Tea Partiers and other like groups will muster the power to effect elections in 2010 and 2012. They have demonstrated a bit of success in the 11/09 elections.

BTW, what is it the Tea Partiers are doing that others would "abhor"? I mean, that's strong language. What exactly are they doing that is abhorrent?

[ninjapirate0507]

Well, what the fuck was he doing at a town hall meeting with a gun? There are only two possibilities, he was either too fucking stupid to realize why this was not looked kindly on, or he was up to no good.

[InvestigatorDave]

I don't know why the man (which man does not matter, although you did not specify) was at the town hall meeting with a legally registered weapon which he was permitted to carry. There are more than 2 possible reasons, contrary to your declaration otherwise, but I'm not aware that anyone asked him why. Did anyone? What did he say? (Or do YOU not know either, and you're just making up the 2 possible reasons?)

[ninjapirate0507]

I was just joking, Chill out. I personally take MY automatic rifle EVERYWHERE that I go, you never know when it may come in handy, like say a marauding gang of Mongolian neo-barbarians comes to disturb the neighborhood with their superior horseback skillz. lolz Yeah, because carrying a gun around a political meeting in the US is just cool, no way he could have any motives of intimidation or anything. Get serious dave.

[InvestigatorDave]

So you've decided to discuss the man with the rifle. OK. You did not specify before. It was an automatic rifle? You can tell by looking? If it is an automatic, it would be illegal. I hope the authorities were notified. As to why he was carrying this weapon, neither you nor I know. You have now posited 3 reasons (despite your original comments saying "there are only two") as to why he did it. Why speculate? To what end?

[ninjapirate0507]

Wow, you really do lack in basic reading skills. 1. I said I take MY automatic rifle, didn't say his was, it was part of a sarcastic remark. 2. A motive of intimidation would fall under "up to no good" now wouldn't it? Do pay attention.

[InvestigatorDave]

OK, so in an effort to be sarcastic, you compared your actions to that of the man with the rifle -- except you don't have the same weapon as he does? Or do you? Or who the heck cares? Face it: you stepped in it here.

I suppose intimidation could fall under the general category of "up to no good", but since you STILL don't know his motivation, you are still making stuff up. Why? To what end?

[ninjapirate0507]

You are focusing on this unimportant part because you have no other valid point. Actually looking at it he had a semi-auto. Big fucking deal The point is there is no reason to show up at a political event with a gun, unless one is just stupid or up to no good.

[InvestigatorDave]

ACCORDING TO YOU: This is unimportant (now that you can't prove it's auto).

ACCORDING TO YOU: There is no reason to show up at a political event with a gun -- except for 2 reasons.

ACCORDING TO YOU: The man is stupid or up to no good.

Wouldn't it be better to ask the guy why he was there with a weapon, and get his answer, than to just leave to motivation UP TO YOU? (Especially given your track record on accuracy so far.)

[ninjapirate0507]

Good job at providing a brilliant example of what a straw man fallacy is, good on you. Now

According to me: I never said he had an automatic

According to me: There are only two possible reasons why he would show up to a town hall meeting with a gun, my reasons based on logic, a concept with with you seem unfamiliar.

According to me: There is no way for me to ask said individual therefore I will asses the situation with logic.

I have said nothing inaccurate. Continued

[ninjapirate0507]

Also, if you think my assessment is inaccurate, then please give me some reasons why, and alternative ideas as to why he would do this. If your logic makes sense, then I will admit my assessment was wrong. I am after all intellectually honest.

[InvestigatorDave]

Why he MAY have done it:

1. Your two possibilities

2. He is legally able to do so, and does so routinely.

3. He is legally able to do so, and did so that day for reasons known only to him.

4. He was making a protest regarding the 2nd amendment

5. He wanted to protect himself from a beating like that given to another protester handing out flags by a guy in an SEIU shirt (belive in St. Louis).

There are a few. The list could be endless. Still, I'm willing to accept more than 2 reasons.

[InvestigatorDave]

No straw man here.

The comparison btwn you and your automatic and he and his rifle were inescapable. I do, however, admire your attempts at escaping tho.

I'm very logical, and therefore realize there could be many reasons why he was there with a gun. You can only see 2 possibilities. Whose logic is stilted here?

There is no way for ME to ask him either, but I'm not going to limit the # of possibilities for his behavior like you do. He would know better than you or I.

[Boostnitup]

If it was automatic and he had a license to carry it.... NOPE! It would be very legal as it is licensed to him.

We need to shut down this nation's highway system with clunker cars, farming machinery, and parked 18 wheel tractor trailers so we can starve you LIBtards and force you to eat your zoo animals... you are already shooting, thugging, and raping each other unabated why not toss starvation on top of it so the rest of the world can see what inner city gang member animals act like?

[InvestigatorDave]

Bollo:

While you're at it, do you have any evidence that all these people believe in death panels? That there is not going to be rationing of care in Obamacare?  Evidence that these people think "czars" are a communist takeover? Evidence that Van Jones wasn't an actual Communist (he did declare himself such).

[jufu999]

If you say so, Teabagger.

[InvestigatorDave]

jufu:

Name calling? You resort to name calling? Is that the way in which you engage in debate? Do you find that you convince people of your point of view very often with that tactic?

Or are you like Keith, and just resort to: When you can't refute the facts, attack the speaker.

[bollo3000]

Dude, s/he's just trying to wind you up - seems to have worked.

KO attacks the speaker with the facts.

[eksdem]

Olbermann is SLEAZE-YACKER.

[eksdem]

I should qualify my comment....

Olberman nis a Typical Lib SLEAZE-YACKER who has nothing positive to contribute to a public discussion.

[OLDBEATERSIX]

o my god....

keep clownin em keith!