Added: 8 months ago
From: kellilainedoa
Views: 968
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • List the names of current SC Senate & House who have refused or not returned a letter in response. List their Alma Mater too. Search Google for Booklet_2010_14thedition and see if there was any other problem with the proposed bill.

  • So, the bill says "SECTION 2. Article 3, Chapter 6, Title 23 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

    "Section 23-6-115. Notwithstanding another provision of law, each highway patrol vehicle must be equipped with a field breathalyzer device that must be administered on a person who a highway patrolman has stopped for being suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or another substance." - Seems clear to me.

  • I've always agreed and have been outraged that nothing has been done. I'd like to kick the **** out of a LOT of people in SC. Love to you, Pam and Kelli, always <3 (Amy from Facebook)

  • @JaysonsMom

    thank you so much Amz!!!

  • One would think that South Carolina wouldn't want anymore blood on it's hands. It seems so ancient that the troopers don't have the breathalyzer! It's crazy!!

  • @Roz2U 

    agree!!!! thank you so much. xo Pam, Kelli's mom

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more