Added: 4 years ago
From: shaunw68
Views: 6,203
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wow you shoulda spent less money and got the 96 z28 ss cause those were rated at 305 hp at the crank wow thats retarded.

  • Looking at the other "For sale" video from this poster, this is not a real SS. It's a Z28. No SS wing, plus an aftermarket ram-air box. Nice try. ;)

  • For a 97 basic LT-1 motor the horsepower rating should be at 285 HP. Now if it is a true SS/SLP it should be putting out 305 to 310 HP. If you truly are one of the very lucky owners of the very rare 97 SS/SLP with the LT-4 engine package, you should be putting out 330 HP which is underrated supposively because of the LS1 that was to appear in the Camaro the next year. There was only 106 including 2 prototypes for the Camaro with the engine and i believe 26 or 28 Firehawks with that package.

  • Automatic. Fuckin' weak!

  • automatic or manual it would be the same engine just different transmission dumb ass... manual would probably be faster, but they both have same engines... unless it's SS

  • why would a manual have anything to do with horsepower? your an idiot

  • @HomelessGuy40 your the idiot everyone know manual cars put down more power then auto on dynos

  • @mylilpony71 how am i an idiot? somebody said it makes more power at the crank because it's a manual so i was questioning his comment

  • @HomelessGuy40 my bad i jump the gun

  • @mylilpony71 no worries, youtube doesnt do a good job with keeping replies together so you probably didnt see where that comment was originated

  • and from the sound its an auto too. those numbers are right where they should be for stock

  • I really like the sound of yours is it factory catback system too? My friends selling his but I could never afford the insurance as I'm in college at the moment. I have a 95 firebird with a 383 450HP engine in it haha so imagine the cost! Let me know when you post more videos if you already haven't cause I'd like to see!

  • u sure it only pulled 250

  • It's only a LT1 and thats dam good because he his the factory numbers perfect and that doesn't always happen.

  • ONLY an LT1??? WTF's the matter with you! First of this isn't just any engine, second it should pull 285hp. Maybe this one is old, and prob. no mods.

  • The 285 hp factory rating is the amount of hp the engine produces at the flywheel. The amount of horsepower put to the rear tires is quite a bit less as you can see. It's perfectly normal. It's because of many factors. ;)

  • Very good numbers for a stock LT1 A4. I mean, very good. I've seen some high-mileage A4 cars putting down 235rwhp.

  • 285 at crank fuck tard not to the wheels

  • oh shit.. i overlooked that... oh god, i'm a fuck tard.. oh no..

    fag.

  • w/e man just get ur shit right before u blabber about something u dont know

  • chill out Nigga! not like I'm against Camaros, my 95 Z28 pulled 378 AT THE WHEELS with cam, lifters, rocker arms and cold air intake.

    I just figured since this Camaro as a dyno pull video it would pull a bit harder than 250.

    Either way...... Im a Camaro fan, so chill.

  • oh sorry man i just thought u came off as an arrogant asshole that thinks hes tough shit because he runs 15s and doesnt know shit bout cars

  • ...the real ss model from slp had 305.

    looks like you need to update your info as well.

  • what are the numbers???

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more