Added: 1 year ago
From: AdversusHaereses
Views: 4,210
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I missed a few, like FSSPX?

  • @TurboVW2004

    actually no Jesus is not present in the new mass, i suggest you google most holy family monastery

  • @davidemtl Really? Who told you that? I think I'll believe Christ himself over someone on YouTube.

  • @TurboVW2004

    you make no sense, when did Christ say you can change the mass? just read from the website I posted and inform yourself

  • @davidemtl I see you must be a Sedevacantist.

  • @TurboVW2004

    yes the proof that the Church in Rome is a counterfeit with an anti pope in power since 1958 is overwhelming

  • Oh please. It was tradition to fast from midnight until Holy Mass, then the discipline was changed 3 hrs before Mass, then changed to 1 hour.

  • opportunity for many blessings from the Eternal and font of infinite graces.

    May the will grow in us to promote peace and justice in the world, which has great need for authentic witnesses to the truth. May God, in his goodness, protect the Jewish Community and may he grant deep friendship between us in this city of Rome and all over the world.”

  • None of these groups you mentioned are traditional. They may prefer the old to the new; they may prefer the smells and bells of the Tridentine to the desolation of the Novus Ordo, but they are not fighting for Tradition. Corpses on the battlefield...that's all they are.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris

    do you follow all the teachings of the sspx?I have attended their mass since it's the only traditional mass around but for instance do you consider Benedict to be the pope?

  • @davidemtl Yes, I do.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris

    do you consider him to be a heretic?

  • @davidemtl He is a material heretic, but no one can prove formal heresy.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris

    Benedict XVI’s September 29, 2011 Telegram to the Chief Rabbi of Rome, Dr. Riccardo Di Segni for Rosh Ha-Shanah, for Yom Kippur and for Sukkot: “On the occasion of Rosh Ha-Shanah, of Yom Kippur and of Sukkot, I wish to extend my most cordial greetings and heartfelt wishes to you, esteemed Dr. Riccardo Di Segni, and to the entire Jewish Community of Rome, so that these important holidays may be an

  • Wrong: Institute of the Good Shepherd gave up the fight for tradition. They are now Conciliar Catholics. FSSP never was Traditional. They are purely Conciliar, with a preference for the Latin Mass. The Institute of Christ the King has also given up the fight against Modernism for a paper that says they are in "good standing" with Rome. Friars and monks who refuse to have the corona are not traditional. It is a sad thing to see a Friar or monk with a full head of hair and not right.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris I did not know that having hair, or shaven bald is an act of whether one is a monk or friar. Second, the SSPX will change nothing and will not change Rome. Rome will change Rome. No outside influence will.

  • @sgal88 A shaven baldhead has been continually identified as a sign of a man's consecration to God and complete offering of himself to the service of Christ and His Church. We read in the Fourth Book of Kings that forty-two young boys of Bethel who had been raised with a prejudice against the true religion and its ministers mocked St.

  • @sgal88 Elisha, the disciple of St. Elijah. And how was he identified and mocked? The boys said, "Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head." Here we see that a baldhead was a contradiction even in those days before Our Lord's life on earth. And still today the baldhead is a contradiction to the world's fashion and haircuts.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris It is a contradiction but it doesn't mean that it is necessary for a monk or friar to be bald or what not.

  • @sgal88 Monks wear the tonsure as yet another reminder that they have confounded the wisdom of the world and chosen instead the wisdom of the saints. The tonsure is a penance, too. In cold winters a baldhead, like feet without shoes, is a penance. The monks embrace this opportunity to show obedience to the Church and the monastic tradition.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris But it is not necessary is my point. Franciscan monks can wear shoes during the winter, not necessarily sandals or be barefooted.

  • @sgal88 The tonsure is very necessary for it shows that a monk fully renounces the world. It also helps to tell the difference between a monk who is not a priest (clean shaven) and a monk who is a priest (has a corona).

  • @WeepingStellaMaris No is isn't. I have seen pictures of Franciscan preV2 who at times did not have their tonsure.

  • @sgal88 The Catholic monks tonsure represents the crown of thorns of Jesus. It represented their vow of following Christs example.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris Sir, I believe you. I am only arguing your "It is a sad thing to see a Friar or monk with a full head of hair and not right," when in fact friars have had full set of hair back in those pre-V2 times. It is like saying that to be a Franciscan monk, one has to have a beard. No, you do not.

  • @sgal88 Those monks who abandoned the tonsure before Vatican II had abandoned the Brotherhood in their hearts already. It is the same thing as a Sister abandoning her veil.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris That is being rather judgmental. Padre Pio, my favorite saint, at times had the preppy haircut and not a tonsure.

  • @sgal88 No it's not. It is true. There is no reason to reject traditional practices that have made Saints in your Order and have deep meaning. The only reason one would reject the tonsure or the holy habit or any other part of his Order is because he has lost the love of the religious life in his heart and wants to live as a worldly man. This is why the Sisters rejected the habit. This is why Brothers reject the tonsure. And no Padre Pio always had a tonsure. Sometimes though it is hard

  • @sgal88 to tell because the hair can grow back rather quickly and it almost looks like he is unshaven.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris I receive annual calendars about Padre Pio. He and his fellow friars are at times with a short hair cut or preppy one. At the end of Padre Pio's life, he was loosing his hair but he did at times, have the preppy hair cut.

  • @sgal88 That doesn't mean that it's right. I've never seen a picture of Padre Pio without a tonsure, but if you say so, that doesn't make it right even if it is true.

  • @WeepingStellaMaris But it doesn't mean it is 100% necessary as well.

  • @sgal88 Of course it is 100% necessary simply because it is part of Holy Tradition. Holy Tradition IS the Faith!

  • @WeepingStellaMaris No it is not. It is akin to saying you need a beard to being Franciscan, not!

  • @sgal88 After all the proof I have given about why the Holy Tonsure is so important, it is very clear to see that the only reason a monk would reject having one is because wordliness has invaded his soul. It is the same for a Sister who rejects her habit. All of the Saints have had tonsures if they were religious, so now modern man has to reject what has made Saints? It is not only that but the tonsure is a sermon to everyone. When a man sees a monk without a tonsure, what is there to

  • @sgal88 see but just an average man who happens to be in some sort of habit? He has a full head of hair, completely distinguishing him from his Brothers from the past, the millions in his Order who had the holy Tonsure. But when a man sees a monk with a tonsure, at first he is startled because he doesn't see this very often and it is very shocking and different. Then, he realizes this man is set apart--he is something else--something holy, consecrated to God. The tonsure not only goes

  • @sgal88 back to the Early Church, but back to the Old Testament itself. It is a sin to reject Tradition for no reason. It is robbing God of his honour and glory. God is honoured and glorified in his Saints--in his religious.

  • Deo gratias for Mgr. Lefebvre.

  • @MaartenDeTroyer Amen. The Father of all Traditional Orders....

  • @MaartenDeTroyer It's funny you should say that on this video when all the groups mentioned have broken away from the Archbishop's good Society to betray him and stab him in the back for a deal with Rome. Deo gratias for the SSPX who has not done such a thing, betraying Tradition, betraying Our Lord for a false and venomous friendship with Modernist Rome. Yes, we must go to Rome, but to convert, not compromise.

  • Very good. God Bless!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more