Added: 5 years ago
From: salarsvids
Views: 157,741
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,258)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Buddha was scythian aryan mix, Jesus was parthian, Zoroaster was bactrian.

  • in vatican we are as scythians, they crated the finnugric nonsense identity lol

  • we were manicheaeists, zoroastrianists, buddhists but in ad 1000's our king supported the vatican (with german army ) and killed our leader Koppány who wanted ancient religions.

  • early "christians" were gnostics, gnosticism=manichaeism. in 350 the vatican censored Jesus evangelium and created fake half jewish shits Xd in Eden was a Turul (Phoenix, toghrul) bird and not snake. Horus in egypt=Turul in hungarian mythology.

  • Chris white of knowheretorun1984 has already debunked zeitgeist.

  • Of course this is the truth. Zoroaster was the O.G. ! Why did you think we white devils have been slaughtering the "Easterners" in the name of our "Peaceful Loving God" Mithra oops I mean Osiris oops I meant Jesus. If you other races/beliefs don't stop making sense we are going to have to kill you all. Just play dumb around white folks it's safer.

  • This video is showing the jewish mentality. How ever is this guy he is a big lier.

  • erm... 3.20? anyone notice anything?

  • @richardellipsis yeah what the hell is that?

  • @RebeccaRobin23 Its a MechaCatholic-bot, whatever that is! :)

  • @richardellipsis that mother fucker has a lightsaber!

  • @sexicantravioso1 nevermind, its a robot lol

  • IMO god was created by the stars the sun and the moon. I am an atheist and this re affirms it even more.

  • Have you read the old testament. If so. Post the prophesies you feel Christ failed to fulfill.

  • i think that all the politicans are atheists ..maybe pope also. if they would belive God and feared Him they will not commited such cruel wars... i am saying that to the uploader of this video that being an atheist doesnt mean that u are saved from evil things.

  • i am waiting u for a video attacking Islam...but i think u will fail

  • @MrWolfandraven83 If you don't see that this relates to Islam as well then you don't understand Islam very well.

  • Comment removed

  • @richardellipsis i know islam very well and this dont have nothing in common with islam

    I DARE YOU!

  • @MrWolfandraven83 if you know Islam very well then you'll know that the basic parts of it refer to the preceding beliefs of Judaism and Christianity. If they turn out to be merely forged copies of previous religions, as this video states, then that means Islam is also based on somewhat shaky ground. Why not discuss, rather than shout at me?

  • @richardellipsis in Islam Jesus is not the sun of God.he was not killed and he done have a birth date and he was not resurection after 3 days

  • @MrWolfandraven83 That may be, but the Qur'an, Sunnah and the Hadith are based on excerpts, stories, "histories" and parables from Judaism and Christianity, which preceded it by 600 years. It still means its based on a previous religion, which they all are in a way.

  • @MrWolfandraven83 jesus isn't the sun of god in Christianity either

  • @parkerthehicks

    "But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall" Mal4:2 This is the sun god Jesus meaning son of Zeus.

  • @MrWolfandraven83

    "But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall" Mal4:2 This is the sun god Jesus meaning son of Zeus. Paul = false apostle. jesuswordsonly(dot)com

  • when we say the holy ghost is an individual spirit is also a Roman creation.The real holy ghost of god is it blessing that passes as a energy forces to enlighten one life.If we are in favor of the pillars of the laws than we will be bless,however we are all are subject to complete this journey of life to inherit a new life some were in the universe.How the religion of man came to be is part of the process of wisdom and enlighten.

  • Just ignore all the prophecies Christ fulfilled, ignore Christ came when He was prophesied to. Ignore 4 thousand years of rituals pointing to Christ; and you call believe anything. Don't ask for sources for what is said. Don't read the bible so you fail to see that it tells the soul is not immortal(only those who believe will be brought back) .

  • @ooDuckey01

    Why don't you ask Jews what they think of their supposed messiah?

  • @TheCraziestFox The Jews wanted a Messiah that would rule Israel the way they wanted him to. They wanted a Messiah to overthrow the Romans according to their plan. They wanted a Maccabees type Messiah. Not one who preached peace with all people, love your enemy, Forgive the gentiles. The time prophecies of Christs return have all long passed. So they turned to the Kabala(demon wisdom, worship of man)to fill their desires Satan fills the selfish needs of those who reject God.

  • @ooDuckey01

    Jews also wanted a messiah that would actually... you know... fulfil the old testament conditions. Jesus is by his own standards a false prophet.

  • very difficult to read the texts on the background images, and it goes too fast.

  • These are erroneous lies meant to lead people away from the truth probably motivated on hate of Christianity and not love of the Truth... one reason, what do the crusades have to do with Mithras or Jesus? Both were dead?!? and it has nothing to do with the topic! its like saying that 2+2 doesnt equal four and then mentioning ur dislike for the math teacher. like hello?!

  • This is nonsense... to begin, Mithras was a made -up god of many who was born before the creation of the world! Experts of Mithraism themselves say that if anything Mithraism was based on Christianity as it was spread by Roman soldiers in the early centuries AD. Experts would not agree on this perspective! Second, Jesus Christ is still a historical person who actually existed and this proved by many historical documents which speak about him! while no docs accounts for mithras' actual existence!

  • Considering that Christians were Persecuted during its first 300 years of its beginning, your claim is credible lol. On the Other hand I can see parts of the Mithra being adapted into the christian belief by heretics after it became the roman's empire official religion. We can see Many things that initially did not belong to the christian religion after 391. Such as the Virgin Mary, saints, white magic, the pope and other crap I don't remember.

  • i love jesus

  • another blasphemus lie!!!!!

  • I'ts because Christianity became so populair in Europe, that Mithraism added some stories to their religion. It's true that the birth of Christ wasn't 25 december. Because it was easier with the introduction of Christianity to celebrate on the same days, they decided to celebrate Christ birth the 25th. Pagans celebrated solstice.

  • Comeon dude stop hatin on religion. First science with its facts now history. Without religion how willwe be able to belife in a magical afterlife. Whats next physix will go against rel

  • And that's not even taking all the other factors into consideration which would make it 1.300,000,000,000,000,000,000,­000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00­0,000,000,000,000,000 to 1.Don't you hate science and facts!!!!!

  • Lets see.....both born Dec.25(out of 365 days).....both had exactly 12 disciples(out of lets say a possible 200(or more!)......both resurrected after 3 days(could have happened after 1000 days or more).365x200x1000= exactly 73,000,000 to 1 that this just a coincidence.The odds of this equation ending with '000,000' is 1,000,000 to 1.( Punch it into a calculator yourself if you don't believe me)Which means the odds of Jebus Christ not being based on the life of Mithra is 7 Trillion to 1!!!

  • The most profound evidence for this letter being a Roman fabrication is Matt 1:8.

    " Jehoram , THE FATHER of uzziah" , the writers could have said "GREAT-GRANDFATHER", from 2 Chronicles 26:1, Uzziah's actual father is AMAZIAH. The Flavians decided to just go ahead and force the Roman 14 , instead of keeping the original 18 .

    In the last 2 sets of 14 , JECONIAH is counted twice , giving the last set of 14 only a 13 count because Jeconiah was already counted from the previous set.

  • Comment removed

  • 3rd, Jesus was BEFORE Mithras, Mirthas was AFTER jesus, (80-100 AD)

    4th Mithras was born from a rock and there is no scripture saying he was a virgin birth, a good reason for this, rocks cant be virgin.

    5th i still havent found a single connection of Mitrhas and Christianity.

  • This video is so bad. First of all nowhere in the bible was jesus born in december 25th, 2nd"According to M.J.Vermaseren, the Mithraic New Year and the birthday of Mithras was on December 25.[51][52] However, Beck disagrees strongly.[53] Clauss states; "the Mithraic Mysteries had no public ceremonies of its own. The festival of natalis Invicti [Birth of the Unconquerable (Sun)], held on 25 December, was a general festival of the Sun, and by no means specific to the Mysteries of Mithras."

  • When Christianity started ,paganism beliefs and practice were being mix into because of the popularity of people receive the holy sport. Apostle PAUL warned of those stories and false teacher's but it happen like Christmas and Easter and Sunday sun-worshipping and all different prayer chanting's.

  • It's quite sad the false gospel is around these days.

  • fucking hell, dont put light coloured writing over light pictures. really fucking annoys me

  • Oh and did I forget to mention that your video excludes any shred of this "NEW ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE" that you claim was recently dug up in 2006 but then somehow makes the same claims that conspiracy fiction book authors have been making since the early 19th century, which have been getting refuted for almost 200 years by real historians?

    I forgot to mention that didn't I?

  • So the thrust of your argument is:

    1 --- Jesus wasn't born on the 25th of dec, pagan Gods were:

    well everyone knows that the date of Jesus' birth is undocumented. What else do you have?

    2 --- Words in different languages that sound alike must have been stolen from each other:

    That's not only ignorant, but painful to hear.

    3 --- Christianity is a reprint of Judaism:

    Not it is not, Christianity IS Judaism. What else you got?

    This pseudo-historical BS is always good for a laugh.

  • I'm not Christian and I believe fully that the whole Christian legend of Jesus (as) arose from the legends of Mithra, but there are some misleading points in this video. Overall, though, I enjoyed the video very much. Thank you for posting.

  • you should also mention that christianity developed and spread in the sasanian cultural sphere(it was at that time persucated in roman impire)before in the roman one, and one reason also that the romans persucated it. the cloths of the clergy are still in accordance with the one of the mithrais, and the headgear is still named mithra!!

  • It's interesting that only the rabid atheists are the ones that claim a Jesus conspiracy. Mainstream historians fully acknowledge the historical existence of Jesus his life and his plight. They cannot of course comment on the miracles surrounding his life. I have not read about Mithra yet, but I find it interesting that a man lived a real life that paralleled such a story. Seems prophetic to me.

  • @cfi2927087 - "Mainstream historians fully acknowledge the historical existence of Jesus his life and his plight"

    That is incorrect. The majority of CHURCH historians (not historians) agree that there was a historical Jesus. They don't agree on who he was though. They don't know who he was. They just assume he existed. They cannot even be sure he was called Jesus.

    If he did exist, which he probably didn't, then his plight would be nothing like the Gospels.

  • @cfi2927087 - No such thing as prophecy. You believe that and you'd believe anything.

  • @Franknarfable - Depends on what you mean by prophecy. I'm assuming you are thinking of the definition that states a prophecy is a prediction of the future. Prophecy has more than one meaning.

  • @cfi2927087 - Prophecies like - Jesus predicting the death of Simon and the sparing of John - Jesus predicting the fall of Jerusalem a generation after his own.

    The Jewish War by Josephus tells us that Titus destroyed Jerusalem, a generation after Jesus predicted. And at the end of the book, Titus has the rebel Simon killed in Rome and spares John.

    Titus, Titus, Titus.

    The Jewish War was written first and the NT back-dated. Surely. I mean... it's obvious, right?

  • acharya s back peddles on ALL of her zeitgeist claims and sources :

    search for: The 'Real' Zeitgeist Challenge" DEBUNKED

  • You need to limit tertiary sources, hearsay, and conjecture from your argument

  • In the infancy gospels Christ is born in a cave because Mithraist converts likely wrote those and Constantine worshiped Sol Invictus (aka Mithras) which is a Greco-Roman rehash of Mithra, non-related says almost every scholar on the subject- to the Persian Mithra.

  • You misspelled Divine and Confirmed

  • All your parallels come from sections taken from the infancy gospels and inserted into Matthew and Luke.

  • Mithraism at the time of Jesus was NOT a Major Roman religion. It was a religion largely hated because Rome was always at war with Persia. It really was only catching on in Pontus

  • You MORON! The Bible never claims Jesus' birthday is on December 25th.

  • I do not care about arguments, religions or god(S) ..... BUT look at 3:20 on this video ...... that's a robot , no ???

  • This may be something horroble of me to say since I did grow up christian but after doing tons of research, I dont understand why Judaism, Christianity and Islam still sruvive to this day and after all the knowldge weve dug up or discovered over the years...I kind of miss the Old religions but thats just me..

  • Persian invented Wheel,architecture,discovered fire,warfare,Astronomy....they were surrounded by enemies and couldnt go on.Islam destroyed Persia.

  • @XenaXerxes666 persia and india the same !

    

  • @rakiema1 hell no. persia is dead. india is alive.

  • search for: The 'Real' Zeitgeist Challenge" DEBUNKED

    John Gwyn Griffiths " Pyramid Text line 632"

    isis "placed opon thy phallus and thy seed comes forth into her"

    NOT A VIRGIN BIRTH Deuteronomy 17:3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded;

    search for: Zeitgeist addendum is NWO propaganda

  • I most definately understand this video! i've heard of all these gods. Only problem is with jesus, when he got up the dead got up with him. Could it be a myth? Jesus blew into the upper room & left the holy ghost! Most churches aint holy anymore so they have no idea of what the holy ghost is. I was one of them. Now not only does satan parallel Jesus, he"s got christians beleiving the holy ghost is demonic when the book(kjv) lays it out for everyone! Not ony the assurance, its the proof.1thess1:5

  • Interesting video, try website Jesusneverexisted. Also Earl Doherty, 'Jesus Puzzle', G.A. Wells, 'The historical evidence for Jesus', Richard Carrier, ' Not the impossible faith', John W. Loftus, 'Why I became an atheist', Dan Barker ' Godless', Victor J Stenger, 'God, the failed hypothesis'& 'The New atheism'.Youtube video, "The God who wasn't there" or ZomGitsCriss. Was there no human Jesus or a real human Jesus who was mistaken about there being a supernatural realm?

  • That religions borrow ideas , is hardly revolutionary . The ideas freely flow from place to place , and from people to people . But the idea the ancient christians or others , simply ' made up ' Jesus , is a bit much to believe . That they incorporated ideas from others is true . That 1st century Palestinian Jews would ' make up a god ' is a bit much to believe .

  • @ComradeAgopian Why? I just watched a video with a list of several thousand known gods. And in a primitive time where people had an average life-span of 35 years, very poor communication, almost no literacy, it would be strange if new gods weren't made up all the time. People even make up new "gods" and religions today. And christianity was very small, one of many religions, when emperor Constantin chose it as a new religion for Rome. If he had chosen another, I doubt there'd be christians today

  • @winterstellar Right on target! But I've found it is impossible to reason with people when it comes to something they believe purely on faith. I no longer even try. To each his own.

  • @ComradeAgopian You need to look up Seraphis then. He was a totally made up god by combining two gods.

  • 3:20 thats pretty interesting to learn that they had robot fighters during the crusades

  • This song is so odd and cool. it's sung in mongolian

  • The days of the week are named after and in the same order of stellar appearance as the seven celestial bodies recognized in the time: Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus and Saturn. The names in English were taken from German translation of Latin.

    You know what, I am not even going to finish this is ridiculous, every, stop watching this crap and go read books on real history. I am not promoting religion, but I am condemning ignorance.

  • A lot of what is said in this video is blatantly false.

    December 25th is not the longest day of the year, nor the believed birthday of Christ until after the fall of the Roman Empire.

    Also, by the time all of those things were integrated into Christianity by Constantine the Persians and the Holy Roman empire were smaller than either Italy or Iran is today.

    The word christ comes from the latin word cristi meaning 'crest' or 'plume'.

    The word kreest in Persian would have been pronounced krayash

  • The Maker of this video is claiming the Pope Spoke to Moses out of the burning bush. They claim the Pope gave Moses the Ten Commandments. They claim the Pope made Israel a nation. They claim the Pope helped David Defeat Goliath. They claim the Pope got mad and let Israel be taken away by the Assryians and Judea by the Babylonians.

  • @PrinceFelipe Your point?

  • @Murmaks The point is Jesus is in the bible from beging to the end. If Jesus is truly a Roman Creation then they are saying that the Romans wrote the entire bible including the Jewish Tanahk that speaks of Jesus. Since Jesus spoke to Moses that means the creator of this video is saying Moses, Adam and Eve ect, was made up by the Roman's. Did the Roman's also build the Waling wall in Jerusalem?

  • @PrinceFelipe In fact they did.

    The Romans also were the main organizers of the edict of Worms, set the modern standard for the Baptist church and on top of that were behind the assassination of French pacifist Jean Jaurés.

    And that is just a tiny fraction of all the things the vile and extraordinary things the Romans have done...

  • @Murmaks Why would the Romans start the Jewish Race? Why would they build two Temples in Jerusalem and then destroy them? If the Roman's Made up Jesus why did they make him Jewish and not Roman? Why would the Roman's say the Antichrist is a Roman? Why did the Roman's Start circumcision? Why did the Roman's tell Moses to make the Menorah and Ark of the Covenant?

  • @PrinceFelipe - The Romans didn't start the Jewish Race. They started Christianity. They made Jesus a Jew because they created the Jewish Messiah. If they made him Roman then it wouldn't have "worked".

    They destroyed Jerusalem and then began writings/promoting Christianity.

  • @Franknarfable If the Roman's didn't start the Jewish race, then how did they start christianity? The Hebrews spoke of Jesus long before the Romans came to power, so how could have the Romans made Jesus up? Jesus is throughout the TanahK, if you claim the Romans made the New Testement then you are claming they also wrote the Tanahk.

  • @PrinceFelipe - "The Hebrews spoke of Jesus long before the Romans came to power" - No they didn't. The spoke of a Messiah that would come and they still do, they didn't say he was called Jesus.

    "then how did they start christianity?" - They destroyed Jerusalem, defeated the Jews and then created Christianity. They had the power, resources, influence, education, spoils of war, everything.

    Jesus Christ did not appear until the Romans wrote the Gospels post-70 AD.

  • @Franknarfable Wait a minute Here get your hands off of satan's gentials and stop servicing him for just a second and listen. The prophets spoke to the Word of God and the Word of God is Jesus. Abraham spoke face to face with Jesus before Jesus destroyed Sodam And Gomorah. Jesus spoke to Moses out of the burning bush and told him "I AM that I AM". The Judaist Messhiah is a bunch of bullshit as the Judaist spit on the Law of Moses and hate Yawey. The Jewish Messiah is Jesus aka Yashua in Hebrew.

  • @PrinceFelipe - Again, Jesus Christ does not appear in history until the New Testament. The Jewish writings before that do not mention him. It doesn't say Jesus spoke to Moses from the bush. It doesn't say that Jesus spoke to Abraham anywhere.

    The Romans invented Jesus Christ and nothing you have said disputes it.

    In fact, you're just making things up. You're seeing words where there isn't any. It's nonsense.

  • @Franknarfable So you have cut out what the Burning Bush said to Moses, you have cut the Word of God out of it as well. Your cut out when Jesus spoke to ABraham.You have cut out what God said to Job out of a whirlwind. How much of the bible is left with all the chopping you have done? So why would the Roman's call themselves the bad guys in the bible? Boy are you a stupid fool.

  • @PrinceFelipe - Jesus is not mentioned in the Torah, i want quotes. His name is NOT mentioned in history until the New Testament. This was written at least generation after the supposed existence of Jesus. What are you talking about?

    Give me quotes from the Old Testament that mention Jesus. That shouldn't be too difficult for you, should it?

  • @Franknarfable Are you to lazy to look up the "WORD of God:" that spoke to the prophets in the Tanahk? Are you to lazy to read what the burning Bush said to Moses "I AM THAT I AM" ( Jesus said before Abraham was I AM) If you had bothered to pay attention you would see Jesus is the WORD of God in the Tanahk. Messiah would be rejected Psalm 118:22 just as Jesus was rejected by Israel.

    Jesus Who is the Lord comes and meets face to face with Abraham Genisis 18

  • @PrinceFelipe - Jesus is NOT MENTIONED in Genesis 18 or Psalm 188 22. You know that Jesus is NOT mentioned in history until after 70 AD because that's when he was invented. If he was then you would be able to give me a quote, you cannot because Jesus is not in the anything written before Christianity.

    You're just making a fool of yourself.

  • @Franknarfable Ok Mr Heathen I guess maybe you are claiming to be the Messiah then since you reject the Word of God., You reject the Ten commandments just like the Judaists do. You reject the fact Jesus is in the Tanahk and your going to spend an eternity in hell for serving the devil. You don't want to follow God's law, you hate God and are using the Roman's as an excuse to try to drag others to hell with you because you are a devil worshiping peice of shit.

  • @PrinceFelipe - All lies. I simply know that the Romans created Christianity. You just cannot handle that fact. The name Jesus is not in the Tanahk, it's just not there, another fact you cannot handle.

  • @Franknarfable - How could the Romans successfully fabricate Jesus and put a fictional person in times and places where people actually lived? Wouldn't those people think, "I never saw this man. I never saw any of the things claimed" How could you fool people in this way?

  • @cfi2927087 - Romans could easily write the gospels. Why not? They could open churches throughout the Empire, instal bishops, eliminate opposition, they had the finest education and the eastern empire wrote in koine greek. They won the war, they wrote history, etc. We only have Josephus and the New Testament covering Judea from that time period. Both works written under the name Flavius.

    Who would write "I never saw this man"? The 3rd Roman-Jewish war officially ended around 135 AD (Bar Kochba)

  • @Franknarfable The Fact is Jesus is the Word of God and you reject the Word of God who is the God of Abraham Issac and Jacob. The Romans would not have made themselves out to be the bad guys had they written the bible. The Catholics would not have called themleves the Whore of Babylon in revelation 17 had they wrote the bible. You reject the Tanahk and that is why you block out the Word of God and blashpheme the Holy Spirit because you hate God's law.

  • @PrinceFelipe - The Romans where not the bad guys in the New Testament. They where just doing their job. Pilate even gave the crowd a chance to release Jesus. "Give to Caesar what is Caesars" - "If a Roman soldier makes you carry his pack one mile, carry it two", etc, etc.

    You ONLY find out Jesus is the Word with the New Testament. And the Romans wrote that. They had read what the previous Jews had written. They where privy to it. Wake up.

  • @Franknarfable You left out render unto God the things that are God's. God owns the World, not Caesar and God's law supersedes Caesar's. You are stupid enoguh to claim the apostles were Romans and not Jews. Go fuck yoursefl in hell with your Roman friends, your beloved Antihcrist is a Roman so go move to Madrid Spain where he lives currently and jerk him off all the way into hell you devil worshiping peice of shit.

  • @PrinceFelipe Oh cheer up mate! If you have a bad day simply talk to us about your problems and we'll listen.

  • @PrinceFelipe - I didn't say the apostles where Romans, I said they where invented by Romans. The apostles are still Jews, fictional Jews, but still.

    "God's law supersedes Caesar's" - Yeah, in death, but while alive your ass was Caesars and he says goes. Not forgetting that God doesn't exist and Caesar does. Don't worry, all the followers of Christianity won't have a clue what's going on.

    Oh right, whoops.

  • @Franknarfable If Caesars law crosses God's law, Jesus says you do not have to obey it. Caesar may have had his time to kill chritsians for not kissing his ass like you do, but now all those Caesars are dead and burning in hell for serving satan. Caesar only had power because heathen like you submitted to him and carrired out his evil wishes. Go whoops your self in hell cause it will not bring you any more joy lying about God!

  • @PrinceFelipe - What happened to all your bullshit about Jesus being written about the Torah? Have you given up on that? Good, because that was nonsense.

    What else you going on about? - "If Caesars law crosses Gods law then Jesus says you do not have to obey it" - That's brilliant. Keep up the good work. Obviously the Romans didn't create Christianity and that proves it.

    I would give up if I was you. You have been worshipping a cartoon character.

  • @Franknarfable "What happened to all your bullshit about Jesus being written about the Torah, Have you given up on that?"

    limited typing space stupid, plus I already showed you Jesus is in the Tanahk and you don't want to listen, I did my job.

    They had cartoons 2,000 years ago? Did Warner Brothers steal the Tazmanian Devil from the Romans? BLah Blue blee week noppa blaha

    So are you moving to Madrid Spain to be close to your Roman Antichrist Prince Felipe of Asturias?

  • @PrinceFelipe - "I already showed you Jesus is in the Tanahk and you don't want to listen"

    I did listen, I am listening and I am still waiting for you show me. As far as I can see Jesus does not appear in history until the writings of the New Testament.

    "They had cartoons 2,000 years ago?" - I don't know, you're the expert on cartoons. I do know they are fictional stories, with fictional narratives and fictional characters, just like the New Testament.

  • @Franknarfable What is the Word of God in the Tanahk ,since you reject what I have said? How could the Word touch a prophets lips if it does not have fleshly form in the Tanahk? Why did Abraham call a Person in human form his Lord? Jesus is the "Word" that spke to the Prophets and because you reject Jesus you do not understand the scriptures. How did the Roman's perfect Jesus from Hebrew scripture that proehcy the future perfectty? Why would the Roman's call the Antichrist a Roman?

  • @PrinceFelipe - "How did the Roman's perfect Jesus from Hebrew scripture that prophecy the future perfecty?"

    They read the Hebrew scripture. Then wrote the gospels. That's how they perfected him. It's not really a complicated procedure. Do you follow?

    The writers of the New Testament could of called him George, it wouldn't matter because the Messiah is NOT NAMED in the Hebrew scripture. They decided to call him Jesus. Obviously.

  • @Franknarfable You don't know shit about the Hebrew scriptures because you spit on them. You spit on the law of Moses so that means you are full of shit. I am the first one I have ever know to have to have actualy acknowledged that Jesus is the Word of God in the Old testment and no fucking Roman taught me shit you devil worshiping peice of shit. Dumb mother fucker think the Romans would call themselves the bad guys. Get satans dick out of your ears and listen for five God damb seconds.

  • @PrinceFelipe - Ok, now you have just degenerated into a sweary, angry person. Let me know when you're ready for a grown up conversation.

  • @Franknarfable You get what you deserve for being a liar.

  • @PrinceFelipe - I am not a liar and I deserve thanks for enlightening you. So, you're welcome.

  • @Franknarfable You deserve an eternity in hell for serving the devil.

  • @PrinceFelipe

    You think I deserve an eternity in a place that doesn't exist whilst serving someone who doesn't exist? I'm not really sure how to take that. Erm... thanks?

  • @Franknarfable Your friend Ted Kennedy has been in hell for over a year now, he is waiting for you to join him.

  • @PrinceFelipe - There's a white coat with your name on it.

  • @Franknarfable The white coats are made by your devil worshiping friends who like to torture people. There wil be a special coat for you in hell that will torment you for all eternity and your friends will have them on too. Justice will be served.

  • @PrinceFelipe - I'm looking forward to it, see you there.

  • @Franknarfable Sorry Jesus does not send His sheep to hell. Jesus sends the goats to hell which are the devil worhsipers like yourself. So I will not be joining you in hell LOL.

  • @PrinceFelipe - You won't be in hell? Suddenly it's appeal doubles.

  • @Franknarfable I will not be in hell, I have given my life to Jesus and submitted to Him.

    Jesus sees into your heart , but you have never welcomed Him in and submitted to Him. Therfore you have no personal relationship with God and He has no name to call you by. To God you are just a bunch of worthless loud noise. Since you have rejected Jesus, your on a path to hell unless you repent and submitt to Him. And you can't change God's law no matter how hard you try to fight it.

  • @PrinceFelipe - Do you really believe this nonsense? Get a grip on yourself. Go read about Vespasian and Titus and their propaganda of peace. They even built a a temple of peace. That's nice isn't it?

  • @Franknarfable Why do you like to watching rightoes men suffer? Why do you sit back and let evil men get away with doing their crimes? Why do you fight agianst Jesus and serve the devil? Why do you worship pagan phony peace temples made by devil worshipers? Vespasian and Titus are both dead and burning in hell.

  • @PrinceFelipe - Vespasian and Titus are dead, but at least they once lived, unlike Jesus who lived and died on paper.

    What men do I watch suffer?

    What evil men am I allowing to get away with crimes?

    What temples am I worshipping?

    I am not fighting against Jesus, there is nothing to fight against.

  • @Franknarfable You like watching men and woman suffer who love Jesus. You like when child rapists get away with their crimes, corrupt polictians make you happy, Catholic Preists who rape children make you happy, you like seeing children be sacraficed to Molech, you like seeing Drs steal from patients while leaving them to suffer . You don't stand against any of these wicked things that are going on, so that means you support all of them.

  • @PrinceFelipe - You have much more in common with Catholic priests. You both believe in Jesus. They do horrible things to the young and you like talking about it.

    Hang your head in shame.

    I talk openly about history and you're talking about... well, we can see what you like to think about?

  • @Franknarfable The bible says the Catholic Church is the Whore of Babylon in Revelation 17. The bible makes it clear a Whore can not be a christian. So the Catholic Preists are your friends. I call for the death penalty for child rapists, you however support child rape. I like justice you like watching injustice. It makes you happy blaming Jesus for the actions of evil men cause you get your rocks off on it.

  • @PrinceFelipe - " you however support child rape"

    Again, I try to talk history and you come back to this. You're obsessed, it's worrying. Can we not just talk about historical documentation and the origins of Christianity without you talking about this?

    I don't blame Jesus for anything. I am talking about the Romans aka the authors of Christianity.

  • @Franknarfable Romans have nothing to do with christianity, Rome started Catholicism which is Pope Worship. Jesus is in the begining of the bible long before the Roman Empire or the Pope came to be.

    Your obsessed with serving the devil and lying about the bible blaming Jesus for the actions of rapist preists that Jesus said to stone to death. If you want to stop lying then we can have a normal conversation about the origins of Christianity.

  • @PrinceFelipe - "Romans have nothing to do with christianity"

    Christianity was spread throughout the Roman empire. Pilate is a Roman. Paul is a Roman citizen. Herod was a Roman client king. The entire story, plot, people, everything, is set within the Roman empire.

    You say, it has nothing to do with the Romans? Come on now.

    And this is (now) a normal conversation.

  • @Franknarfable Paul may have been a Roman citizen, but he was Jewish. You leave that out conveniently. Yes Pilate was a Roman are you saying that means Pilate wrote the Tanahk and the New testment? When did Ceasar order the bible to be written, which Caesar was it? Why would Caesar call himself the bad guy in the bible? Are you saying because The Roman's were over the Jews at that time that magically God's covenant with Abraham was broken and Hebrew scriptures are all void?

  • @PrinceFelipe - Now you're admitting Romans do have something to do with Christianity, good or bad, they still have a lot to do with Christianity.

    No, I'm not saying Pilate wrote the NT. Where do you get that idea? He is Roman and he is "to do with" Christianity.

    Vespasian underwent a propaganda of peace. The New Testament falls directly under his rule and beyond.

    Caesar is not the bad-guy in the NT. The JEWS bring Jesus before Pilate and even then Pilate gives them a chance to free him.

  • @Franknarfable You said the Romans made the bible so pilot would have had to have been in on it. So your saying Pilot loved Jesus? Your saying Vespian called himself a bad guy? When did Jesus say Caesar was the Messiah? Why did you leave out Piolet said Jesus had no fault but he still had him crucified anyways. Why did Vespian want it written that A decendant of Caesar would be the Antichrist? So Vespian is the one that wrote the Book of Genisis?

  • @PrinceFelipe - Why would Pilate of been "in on it"? He existed and died before the 'Year of Four Emperors' (civil war) and before the Roman-Jewish war. Vespasians propaganda campaign for peace came after all of that.

    I love the way you twist things - "So your saying Pilot loved Jesus?" - No, I'm saying the Romans invented Jesus.

    If it's Vespasian/Titus - God/Jesus typology then Vespasian takes the role of God/Jesus. It's satire.

    cont'd

  • @Franknarfable So you are saying Vespasian is Jesus? Vespasian was crucified in Jerusalem for the sins of man? Vespasian healed the sick and raised the dead? Vespasian is your Lord and saviour? Vespasian loves you? Vespasian is in the Tanahk? Vespasian brought Eve to Adam? Vespasian spoke to Moses out of the burning bush? Vespasian Spoke to Jonah and told him to preach to Niniva? Vespasian was in the firey furnace?

  • @PrinceFelipe - Just to confuse you even more, Tactius wrote of Vespasian healing people and Josephus wrote about him being saviour/God.

    You last message tells me that you're never going to understand how satire works, I don't see the point in continuing this conversation. I have explained things and you just go straight back to square one. Parody and satire are alien concepts to you, clearly.

  • @Franknarfable So you are saying that Tactius is the creator now? Josephus loves you?

  • @PrinceFelipe - No, you're saying it.

    I'm saying the NT/Jesus was a part of the propaganda for peace campaigned under Vespasian. Simple. If you don't understand it then go back to whatever you believed before and quit trying.

  • @Franknarfable So you love Tactius, Vespasian and Josephus. Maybe they can save you come judgement day? Maybe you can tell God that satan forced you accept Vespasian as your lord and saviour instead of Jesus. Myabe just maybe it will save you?

  • @PrinceFelipe - "So you love Tactius, Vespasian and Josephus" - How old are you? Seriously.

    I can just see university professors sitting around debating - "So you think Ehrman was correct in his findings? That means you must love him" - You see how stupid that sounds?

    Saving from what? The gospels are Roman propaganda. They are fictional. If you believe they are real then fine, but I'm not going to trade childish insults.

  • @Franknarfable The university professors would not listen, just like you have not listend. Blaming the romans for your wicked heart isn't going to get you into heaven. Your whole purpose in lying about the romans creating Jesus is because you are evil and do not want to follow God's law. You will follow a bunch of lies just to deceive yourself that there is no God and because you can get away with doing whatever evil you feel like in life. Truth is, your going to hell unless you repent..

  • @PrinceFelipe - You think I am evil because I think the Romans invented Christianity? Is that not an extreme position to take?

    A series of often sequential satirical parallels exist, there can be no denying that, so if it wasn't the Romans then why are they there?

  • @Franknarfable I know you are evil because you are using the roman's as an excuse to justify your sin. The Roman's were used by God to punish the Greeks for there sin. Each Empire knew who God was and rejected His commandments, so each Empire had to pay for their sin just like Egpt payed at the time of Moses. Now the Roman Empire is reviving as the EU and will eventualy destroy the Catholic Whore Church who currently has the power over the kIngs of the earth.

  • @PrinceFelipe My god, you are correct.

    This calls for a broadside proletarian revolution!

  • @Murmaks Go ahead and pick your pagan gods, your going to spend eternity in fucking hell with them. No one is going to revolt you devil worshiping smart ass, the world has handed itself over to satan. In hell you will continue to revolt against god and it will do you no good.

  • @PrinceFelipe But-but the Arabian spring? That counts as a lot of revolts. Right?

  • @Murmaks No Arabian spring is not revolts for Jesus, it is Muslims handing themselves over to satan. Arabian spring is biblical prophecy comming to pass. The bible says the Muslims will Team with Russia to attack Israel in Ezekial 38. Once the Muslims brotherhood has all the nations mentioned in the bible under their control, an attack is not very far away. Dmitry Medvedev is the Russia Prince spoken of in the bible who will allie with the Muslims. He is decended from Czar Nicholas Romanov.

  • @PrinceFelipe Hmm... This reeks of Alexander Kerensky's work.

  • @Murmaks Never heard of Alexander Kerensky. Bible says Gog is a Russian Prince. Dmitry Medvedev is like a spitten image of Nicholas Romanov. Anatasia is Dmitry's grandmother. Dmitry sells modernized weapons to Israel's enemys. Dmitry is currently Putins Puppet, It looks like Putin is going to be President (King) again so Dmitry will be under his thumb completley as a Prince is under a King. However Dmitry will still be the one to lead the charge against Israel not Putin.

  • @PrinceFelipe - If it wasn't the Romans then explain the parallels.

  • @Franknarfable Give me the exact scriptures containing the parallels you want explained.

  • @PrinceFelipe - No need, it seems the scholars are out in force supporting this theory. A documentary on it is now due out featuring interviews with Robert Eisenman, John Hudson, Ken Humphreys, Rod Blackhirst, Acharya S / D.M. Murdock, and Timothy Freke.

    A work entitled, 'Christ and Caesar: The Gospel and the Roman Empire in the Writings of Paul and Luke' is also available and demonstrates how the gospels share literature with the Imperial Cult.

    You still want to try explaining the parallels?

  • @Franknarfable Quit playing games advertising these stupid documentariues and give the exact scriptures you want explained.

  • @PrinceFelipe - cont'd

    "Are you saying because The Roman's were over the Jews at that time that magically God's covenant with Abraham was broken and Hebrew scriptures are all void?"

    No. I am saying the Jews where defeated by the Romans and they destroyed Jerusalem. They then wrote the New Testament. As far as I know the Jews are STILL awaiting their Messiah, the covenant is not broken.

  • @Franknarfable I am a Jewish-Christian and I know Jesus is the Jewish Messiah. The Judaists reject Jesus and are waiting for a messiah to come from satan to lead them.

  • @PrinceFelipe - cont'd

    "So Vespian is the one that wrote the Book of Genisis?" - No. The New Testament was written after 70 and by the Romans. The "Old Testament" was written by the Jews, before they where defeated by the Romans.

    "I am a Jewish-Christian" - The Jews where defeated by the Romans, their temple destroyed and their history stolen. The Romans invented Christianity/Jesus to PACIFY everyone. There had been too much bloodshed over the last 4-5 years. Peace was the only way forward.

  • @PrinceFelipe Because obviously the Romans were just another part of the globe spanning Jewish/Muslim/Zoroastrian conspiracy.

    And they had a wicked sense of humour as well.

  • @Murmaks So you are saying that the Romans are your firends? and you both take it up the ass from satan? CBe happy now because in hell you will find no cheer. No more joy in mocking Jesus, no more joy in serving satan in hell. Tell me about your encounters with satan are they worth an eternity in hell?

  • @PrinceFelipe Romans are nice people but I wouldn't say that I'm direct friends with any of them. The closest would be Mario at "Osteria da Giordino". Rome itself is nice too, but far to many Bengali salesmen for my taste.

    Satan is a most modest fellow. He might have a reputation of being a lying, sneaky bastard, but don't worry, I'll watch my back. And of course if I die and it turns out that people like you are the one who comes into his kingdom, I'll probably prefer hell.

  • @Murmaks Good I am glad you are deceived that hell is a good place, that happiness you get from harming others will be gone just as it was for men like Ted Kennedy who died peacefully then woke up in hell for serving the devil. Ted is waiting for you in hell to join him, along with Caesar. You can't take Jesus's sheep from Him you devil worshiping goat. You love to watch others suffer, that is why you fight agianst Jesus cause you care only for yourself.

  • @PrinceFelipe Good gracious! You are right.

    I must start a new life, not built on greed but on the concepts of humbleness and common understanding. I will leave, for Cambodia and try to achieve enlightenment.

  • @Murmaks Sorry the talk you are doing is occultism similar to Hindusim. When you become a christian you start to do what God tells you to. If God tells you to go to Cambodia then that is his will, but if God tells you to stay where you are and serve him there then stay there.

    But we both no you are not listing to God and that is why you mixed paganism with christianity into your last smart ass statement.

  • @PrinceFelipe Oh but Mr. Felipe sir, I was certain that Christianity was mixed with paganism to begin with.

  • @Murmaks My name is not Felipe you dumb fuck, that is just the User ID. You think christianity is mixed with pagnism because you suck satan's dick and obey everything he askes of you..

  • @PrinceFelipe Pardon me Mr. Phillip, but I'm not exactly "playing for the opposite team".

    But give me one of Satan's demonesses and I'll be the worlds happiest man.

  • @Murmaks You are a servant of stanm you get one your knees for him. You either keep Christ's commandments or you service the devil. We both know you hate Jesus, that means you service the devil.

  • @PrinceFelipe I'm sure Stan M. wouldn't be too drastically when it comes to me "getting one of my knees" for him.

    But can't we work out some kind of compromise? What if I follow the teachings of Siddharta Gautama? A path that keeps me away from evil, while not necessarily following the commandments of Christ by the book.