King Arthur -- Battle Scenes

[mastermultitasker]

Ray Winstone is beast!!

[zeitgeist3024]

Why the Batman theme, idiot



[JordoF6]

@zeitgeist3024 because its awesome idiot.

[ironhorzmn]

What a waste of perfectly good p*ssy.

What a tragedy.

[patstanfan]

hi - to me the best battle scene is the Minas Tirith battle from LOTR - I made a video of it with "The Avatar" included as the battle music. It´s on my channel, pls check it out!

[Miauriceful]

Lucius Artorius Castus served in Britain and he commanded 5000 sarmatian horsemen, but 2 centuries before the movie's age.

[PentaMr]

My favorite movie

[amethyst48]

Its prolly closer to the truth then all the rest of the Arthur movies. Noone knows for certain who Arthur was or if he was real with 100% certainty. But one thing was certain Samation mercs did serve with the Roamn armies and many did serve in Roman England, also the Samatians were one of the strongest people the Romans fought, and Rome took mercs where they could find them exspecially good ones.. I personally liked the movies, refreshing after all the knights in shinning armor crap.

[phr34kyy]

@amethyst48

Theirs no such thing as Roman England, just Britons, and the Celtic people (as Arthur and the knight of the round table is a Celtic story) whome of been related to them and made up the Britons (Welsh/Cornish/French/Bretagne­/Belgian etc etc), England did not exist untill long long afterwards, Romans where long gone by then.

[Jigov]

@amethyst48 hahaha i am always laughing when i wach films for the so called ancian england hahaha so retarded and always historical wrong. The interesting part is that they always present it as something so important and beautifull but at taht time people from the "island" lived in caves compared to other parts of europe. Also Arthut wasnt king, and there is no Kamelot lol ??? nor circle table, no knights. I bet you dont even know what a knight means.

[Sjtaf]

@Jigov Oh yeah, Arthur can be made up i believe so too but do you know from wich part of time the story of Arthur began? No, you probably dont because if you did, you knew that in that time kingdoms were starting to rise in England against the Saxons. -.-

[Jigov]

@Sjtaf you mean english man started to come out the caves? :) No, not really i am not interested. People who dont create culture are not important for the human beings. England became strong after colonizations and from stealing others culture and draining other countries. Thats what england is. Even today you drain from your colonies, but in different form. i mean your traditional meal is "Cury" :) ... and sandwiches lol .. i mean.... hahahah you know.

[Sjtaf]

@Jigov Im not ENglish btw :) And what about Stonehenge? isnt that culture? did they had colonies in that time?

[sonofherne]

@Jigov .Your the retarded one and don't know historical accuracy from squat. Granted this movie isn't accurate, but 'living in caves'? People in the British isles lived in houses and built huge monuments from about 3000 BC. ,The chieftains of Arthur's age were wealthy men living in big halls and importing goods from all around Europe. Grow up. Or read a book.

[JulianusFlavius1]

@amethyst48 yes. I mean it's unlikely that there was Lorica Segmentata armed cavalrymen in Britannia during this timeframe (or ever...) but the general gist of it - Smartian Auxillia captain becoming a tribal warlord following the Roman evacuation - is the most likely story involving the origins of the king Arthur legend.

[MrImastinker]

@amethyst48 Roman BRITAIN. It wasn't called England yet.

[666Lawlieth]

Nice video ! :)

[44SCB]

I think king Arthur was Middle Age but this seems more ancient and late Rome.

[ImperialGuard9001]

@44SCB The "Real" King Arthur was around Dark Ages during Sub Roman-British Period during "Migration Period" when Germanic Peoples "invade" or "migrate" to the whats left of Roman Empire. In case of "king arthurs people" the romano-british were whats left of Romanzation of Britons and try to defend their homeland against invaders germanic saxons jutes angles etc its legend that during such grime period for brtions a hero rose that united all factions of Britons and hold the "Saxon" conquest

[ImperialGuard9001]

@44SCB The King Arthur that you probaly know of Knigths of Round Table the Search for Holy Grail Lancelot Guinivere etc was a "fiction" created by mixing several legends of British Peoples together with French Chivalaric tales and other works after several writers and authors add always a little more to the tale it grown and grown until you get what you know as the King Arthur Tales historians try to figure out if there was a realy historical figure for fictional figure for quite a while

[trigga1uk]

stick it to those bloody saxons - bloody foreigners

[ImperialGuard9001]

@trigga1uk You probaly descend from those "bloody foreingners" thats is if you are English

[Shattered0Platinum]

I don't remember this movie.... But I guess I will now. Yay for Blockbuster.

[RievocazioniStoriche]

Hello. We added your video on our playlist. Come

visit.

[lancellotesp]

@HungaricusDominatus I disagree, I think a very good movie, love the history of the period prescribed

really fascinating.

[trithan1473]

ha. women in a melee fight... yeah, as sexy as that is, it totally never happened. and if it did, miss kiera knightly should be dead in about 10 seconds XD

[GunslingerA29]

@trithan1473 actually it did happen. while kiera knightly might not last long women actually did fight as often as the men in some cultures

[deutschschoen]

@GunslingerA29 Yes women fought beside the men in some cultures. I have read that some Celtic battles featured thousands of men and women fighting, nude.

[trigga1uk]

@deutschschoen yea, thats true, there was a lot of equality back then.

[belmontsmild]

@deutschschoen The romans wrote of it, BUT, they described the women as being comparable in size and ferocity as the men. I think that's the issue people have with this movie, Keira is like a 90lbs twig -- I'm sure if you'd see a celtic woman in battle at this time period it she'd of been quite horrid. And by naked, they meant 'without armor' not actually nude.

[YesYouAreIgnorant]

@deutschschoen that is something i'd pay to see

[Levisem17]

Hi, im eleven years old and i have windows movie maker, but how do i get a movie inside it so i can mess with it?? like you did with this

[Venon1995]

If you have the movie in your computer you go to movie maker and upload it.

[Unitor677]

@Levisem17 click on ctrl-alt-delete

[mboy115]

awsome u used that one song from batmam beginss

[laupiaslammas]

sorry for repeating message its molossus or agressive expansion.

[laupiaslammas]

this track could be molossus from batman begins or another from dark knight sorry i don't remember wich track of dark knight

[Playmeforit]

dude troy is an awesome movie

[melechdesmotes]

where is the musik from?

[melechdesmotes]

good cutes i like this video^^ ... and in this movie i like cedrik^^

[TorchTexas]

I agree. Even though I am American these Hollywood people make shit up to make it more exciting, because our culture is ignorant of the facts and they just want cheap thrills.

[mutleypower103]

why was Alexander a fuck up historically? I thought it was pretty close.. and don't tell me the gay stuff isn't real, several sources support it

[TheSteamProductions]

Here are some facts for you

1. Arhur was a good fighter

2. He did try to re unite britain

3. He did almost succeed but then fucked it all up

4. He ruined britain. Waiii Arthur was cool though ;) Sir galahad was better !1

[CallistoKid12]

You mean the MOVIE 'King Arthur' - not the real historical Arthur who screwed up this period.

I agree, this movie is a total bloody mess of history and a crap film. Please people, don't take this film as history. It isn't. It's a weak and feeble Hollywood mass-up.

[avalsonline]

@CallistoKid12 hey, its entertaining. works for me



[BattlestarSingapur]

till schweiger is a german

[BattlestarSingapur]

lo there i see my father....

[ilikenoodles1]

haha such a great song

[xtragel]

i think the director of 300 should've made king arthur...It was more satisfying to watch the fight scenes...

None of the movies compare to the historical legends so far....too bad...still waiting for a really really good one to come out

[GeorgeofGondor2]

Well 300 > Arthurs as a scenario anyways. Arthur more or less are some banch of barbarians fighting like savages in my humble opinion

[xtragel]

haha that's an interesting way of putting it. I believe if they redid the fight scenes with more infantry, it'll look much better. Arthur is supposed to have 12 knights that sit in his grand round table. At the moment he has enuf for a corner table lol =)

[GeorgeofGondor2]

Exactly !

[Tarotshama]

Very nicely edited.

[grunt182820]

yep with you on that

[Dark4Uchiha]

awesome ownage

[ImperialGuard9001]

Man I hate this movie the special effects and battle scens are alrigth but the story is so hollywood and vulgar style realy isnt that great the and the thing that I hated much is that history is put aside in historical movie those Sarmatina Knigths and their famous commander lived in 150 and not in 410 The Woads arent Woads! This is so stupid is Picts and they didnt fougth Saxons in Hadrian Wall in fact the Saxon Invasion was in today England and not in Scotland the real King Arthur was probaly

[ImperialGuard9001]

a Romano-British like in movie but wasnt stationed in Hadrian Walls and wasnt the commander of any Sarmatians he was a warleader that lead the Romano-British to victory both germanic saxons and picts the Romano-British fougth both in fact the saxons were iniatly brough by the romano-british as mercenaries to fight picts realy if just were a little more informed they could make a great movie also what hell is Bors? Lol I didnt know Sarmatians were english "hooligans" he realy looks like a modern

[ImperialGuard9001]

englishman fanatical about football(pretty much the majory of englishxD) realy the only thing I loved about ths movie was the music of Hans Zimmer it never fails I think the movie overal is moderate but it could be great

BTW great video

[MasterofPainfulDeath]

The Pics did fought the saxons when the Romans left Brittain. The Sarmatian Knight's weren't there and Arthur (if he really existed, historical sources mentioned another leader, not arthur) led the stranded civilians and other peoples like in this movie.

[ImperialGuard9001]

Yes the Picts (not Woads) fougth the Saxons the Saxons initly were brougth by desesperate Romano-British to figth as mercenaries that policy backfire of course who whos that lead civilians? I mean in 410 Romans left the wall and no invasion was already there ready for them it take time for picts invaved the wall and invaded Britiania then the Saxons were brougth to figth the threat as the main legions were gone.

[MasterofPainfulDeath]

The civilians were celtic-roman settlers. They would later mix with the picts and create the british populace as we know it.

[ImperialGuard9001]

Hahaha man where you hear that? Thats realy stupid with all respect mate xD You realy need to read some books the british populate if you mean the english are descends of angles saxons and jutes and not celts neither gaelic or brytonic the descends of celts are in Ireland Scotland Wales and Cornwall and others areas the english people is germanic

The picts are the ancestors of the scotish people tougth they mix and disspaer with gaelic scot tribes came from ireland to scotland

[ImperialGuard9001]

Obsilouy Scotland land of scots the tribe from Ireland that settle in Scotland thats the main people that made Scotland the picts probaly mix with them but disapear culturaly at least were absorved by galeic scots one of reasons that irish and scotish are smilar is because they have smilar ancestors both gaelic

Oh ya if you want another curiosty to prove to you that english are descends of germanic tribes see the name England previous was know as Angland land of angles the germanic tribe

[MasterofPainfulDeath]

1) Celts is a combination name of nearly all European peoples. Basic history....

2) English come from Celtic settlers (Non-Romans that came with the Romans, alot of romans didn't came from Italy and thus were "romans"). These mixed with Picts and Saxons later on.

[ImperialGuard9001]

1) Celts are combination name of many european peoples that share comon culture religion and language thus were celts they are different group of germanic that spoken the germanic language had germanic religion culture etc

2) The english are descends of Angles Jutes and Saxons that came to Britain during the Dark Ages todays celts descends of GB are in Wales Cornwall Scotland and Ireland

The english language is germanic language

English=Angles England=Anglland land of the angles

[ImperialGuard9001]

Celtic Settlers? From where then? Since GB is brithplace of Celit People a lot of romans? no the majory of romans Roman didnt mean a people from italic peninsula mean a person that spoke latin had culture and roman religion and had been assimlaited to Great Empire many peoples were romanized example the Brytonic that were natives of Britain thus became Romano-British the pople of Arthur they didnt mix with Picts that were North of the Wall neither with Saxons that conquer them

[ImperialGuard9001]

Some historical evidence points out to Saxon "apartheid" and extermanation policy the romano-british were represed and most fled to areas that werent conquered like Wales and Cornwall many refuges went to Bretagne tougth

[ImperialGuard9001]

The english people speak a West Germanic language brougth by Anglo-Saxons influenced by Old Norse Language after the Norman Conquest

Old English developed to Middle English

borrowing heavily from the Norman (Anglo-French) vocabulary and spelling conventions

[ImperialGuard9001]

The English (from Old English: Englisc) are a nation and ethnic group native to England, who speak English. The English identity as a people is of early medieval origin, when they were known in Old English as the Anglecynn.

[ImperialGuard9001]

The largest single English population live in England, a constituent country of the United Kingdom. They are believed to be genetically a mixture of several groups that have settled in the area, including Angles, Saxons, Jutes, who founded what was to become England (from the Old English Engla-lond) but also the Vikings and Normans.

[MasterofPainfulDeath]

"Romans" in brittain were mostly "celtic romans". It is the name and the status, they weren't actually born in italy.

[ImperialGuard9001]

LOL You have problems reading? Where I say that?

[MasterofPainfulDeath]

I don't mean to offend you but you spell really bad somethimes...

[ImperialGuard9001]

You dont offend me my english is rather bad xD but writing internet normaly isnt the same thing writing in school...

[MasterofPainfulDeath]

Uhu, you need to "learn" it all over same thing here. But I learned iventually :P

[KnightsHawk]

The wall was big,but the farmers took many of the bricks/stones for their own use.And saxons did'nt kill all the brits! aka celts because DNA tests reveal most brits have celt DNA more than saxon and danish viking/norse DNA.

[ajaxfan34]

Saxons!!! Conquered Roman Britain and slaughtered the British!!

[Andorbolt]

Great video!

Name of the song?

[AntiMercyDude]

go barbarions and vikings!!

[00Jose00]

Ah yes, gotta love tha dark ages maan. :) Barbarians everywhere...the fall of rome

[thugugbob]

I will never understand why they didn't hold Hadrian's wall.....

[pawer13]

Because it wasn't a real wall, you could jump it!

[thugugbob]

It wasn't real? Why not? I've seen it!

[ajaxfan34]

it's hardly a wall... not a very big wall in most areas.

[magicstorm1]

lol it wasnt like the great wall of china where a man need a huge ladder or long rope to climb it. Hadrian's wall could be easily overrun

[MystSilverDragon]

Love this

[SumJ23]

great film but inacurate story :D

Fantastic video X)

[J0YTEX]

yeh im pretty sure arthur wasnt around during the roman empire era

[decimuscarrerus]

yes he was, the late empire when it was colapsing.. the whole romano-british thing.. I'm not a hard core english history person but yea i know that.

[azurekenshin]

that being said their "theory" of Arthur is pure conjecture that conflicts with the Legends of Arthur which predate the Romans existing on English Soil. In short the theory has major flaws so there can either be two Arthurs or Arthur Pendragon.

[linkblade0]

Every legend of King Arthur is mere conjecture and theory. Nobody really knows when Arthur really lived.

[BFMVROKZZ]

if he was around at all, this is what they think may be one of the bases for king arthur and he was "around way after this era

[10651]

isnt this the new batman theme?

[CelticRose1]

It is

[peonaco]

@10651 Molossus

[GabeRocksYourWorld]

great movie and p.s i have the game too

[KnightsOfArmour]

Great Video!! Love it!! Many stars to you **********

ladyknight

[arseflip]

tristan FTW!

[CindyPussy]

Arthur's era was approximately 460-530AD - there were no Roman troops in Britain at the time this movie is set, they were long gone by then; and certainly no Roman families living beyond Hadrian's Wall; it's highly inaccurate historically.

Great video, crap movie

[Cirifischio88]

Lucius Artorius Castus was really a Roman officer that commanded 5.500 Sarmatian horsemen in Britain, but in the 122 a.c.(we have his curriculum).

It is difficult to connect him to the character of King Arthur.

[leon778899]

Bloody great piece of work here, keep it up!

Greetings from the UK.

[Rob7194]

was this around 500 AD?

[bernardopereira16]

good job!

great film!

[alskarsport]

wow i really like it :) good work.

[WRA8]

Cool! Well done!

[megacutie08]

I love how you captured the ice scene. Your video is bloody brilliant!

[spaciousgalaxy]

Wonderful job, except I think it would have been better to have King Arthur ride through the gates at the end, instead of just the gates opening.

[sqwishdabug]

Weee King Arthur plus Batman, Way Cool O_O

[somedude221]

Very nice, I like it