Added: 4 years ago
From: NufffRespect2
Views: 685,492
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,035)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • A very well done FEA (Finite element Analysis) of the impact and collapse of WTC 1.

    Pay attention to the geometry of the building!!. It is modeled to exacting detail and entirely faithful to the actual building. Notice where the failure occurs. Right where the plane hit it.

    watch?v=n8pOuler95c&feature=re­lated

  • @roquefortfiles The oxygen-starved fires inside of the Twin Towers likely remained below 250 degrees C, and would

    be harmless to the steel frame even in the absence of insulation. There is no

    evidence that the fires ever damaged the core structures.

  • @MrMelodia89 copy and paste "911research.wtc7.n et/materials/early/flyer/flyer­p.pdf"

    Your a waste. No evidence and no facts. "likely remained below 250" just like I could say "temperatures were well above 1200C"

    People make shit up all the time.

  • @roquefortfiles Note that softening of steel

    by high temperatures is reversible, and that steel is a good conductor of heat. If any

    structural steel had lost strength in the first minutes of the fires, it would have

    regained most of it as the fires cooled after consuming the jet fuel.

  • @MrMelodia89 Nice cut and paste. 

  • @kennyohio Whatever!

  • @MrMelodia89 Yeah you no idea what you're copying and posting here, you idiot!

  • @MrMelodia89 you are basing this on what? your clear understanding of thermo dynamics?

    You would be correct if the fires weren't pervasive watch?v=oi1H8DCLXwM so no time to cool.

    watch?v=9SSS0DDqfm0

    watch?v=ENaifd6I2wE and debris was still on fire after falling 1000 feet so cooling would only have happened after the collapse.

    So looks like your assertions are wrong.

  • Fuck the New world order

  • 1."Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe"

    Niels H. Harrit et al.

    Google the title -- that's the easiest way to find it.

    2. Rapid rate of collapse

    3. Symmetrical collapse

    4. Firefighter testimony of molten metal under the debris, weeks after the collapses

    5. WTC 7 not hit by a plane; NIST explanation defies laws of physics

    6. WTC 7: NIST will not show computer model

    7. NIST only explains all 3 collapse up till the onset of collapse

  • Steve Jones explained how NIST did not look for evidence of explosives in this video:

    watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

    Architects and Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

    While I'm here, why not check-out this video too:

    watch?v=akm3nYN8aG8

    Amazing Speech by War Veteran

  • Comment removed

  • What the fuck? Where do these dumb conspiracy theories come from? A bunch of faggots living in their mother's basement? None of the conspiracy theories make since, and you fuckers couldn't get one court to listen to your retarded bullshit. Truthers are fucking dumb. Atleast we have fucking evidence to prove something

  • @killalldumbasses878 The simple fact that there are no wing marks on the Pentagon wall, the hole is too small for a 757 to fit through. Further the street light that was apparently knocked down by the Boeing 757 shows glass from the street lamp near by, thus a plane hitting it at 400 MPH whould have thrown the glass a very long distance as it would have shattered on impact.

  • @killalldumbasses878 It is likely that the street light was blown just prior to the jet that shot a missile at the Pentagon flew in to make room for it in it's flight path. See the picture of the taxi on the road with the street lamp beside it bellow.

  • @Alexjones67s Those street lamps sit about 100 feet apart. Missiles don't have 124 foot wing spans. 757's do. Missiles also don't provide seating for passengers.

    Seats were recovered. So was the data recorder.

  • @roquefortfiles Nearly everyone was shocked to see the

    towers explode into dust in mid-air,

    including engineers. We were not given

    any time to ask how this happened, as

    the official explanation was already at

    hand to provide a narrative for the

    broadcast images: the buildings, we were

    told, collapsed of their own weight.

  • @roquefortfiles It is horrible to have to analyze the Pentagon crash when real people were killed and families must still miss them terribly but, there are a number of problems with the Official Story that do need to be brought to light.

  • @roquefortfiles What pisses me off is there are no Government agencies anywhere in the world analyzing this information and bringing it forward to the public, nothing other than a few Members of Parliament or Government Whistle Blowers. It is disgusting and yet we continue to tolerate lies and deceptions.

  • @Alexjones67s I agree with you Alex and you know what it makes me upset that we don't have the answers that we need and what the families of the victims need. This is really unfair.

  • @wild0hawks You have received answers you just don't like them. That doesn't make them incorrect.

  • @Alexjones67s So that is so much BS. Hundreds of independent groups have investigated this.

    sydney.edu. au /engineering/civil/wtc.s html (remove spaces) obviously not connect with the US govt.

    How can you justify your beliefs about this with zero evidence to support the conspiracy fantasy?

  • @MrRexquando What about building 7 nigga? It feel at freefall in 10 seconds. It was a controlled demoltion my nigga! Doesn't the truth hurt nigga? How does it feel? Need some advil?

  • @Hotters70652XTY

    Where is the evidence of controlled demolition? You never provide it. How did you measure the "free fall" as no one could see the side of the building that was damaged by WTC1?

    Are you basing your belief on this video? watch?v=k8VAsoVuShM

    No one heard explosions

    No one saw explosions

    No evidence of explosions was found

    watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4 fire fighters state the cause but you won't listen.

    *

    You look pretty silly dude.

    *

  • @MrRexquando After the disaster the site was sealed off. People were threatened with arrest for

    merely taking pictures of Ground Zero. Controlled Demolition Inc. was awarded the

    multi-billion dollar contract to "clean up" the site, which it did with remarkable speed.

    Nearly all of the steel was sent away to be recycled without being subjected to any

    serious forensic analysis.

  • @MrMelodia89 Can you stick with one ID Hotters/Azzur/etc.??

    Go to any murder scene and ask if you can go poke around before the investigation is over. Think about it!

    Prove the steel was shipped off. It went to Fresh Kills and a hanger at JFK.

  • @MrRexquando LOL!! (On the steel). The buildings were 500,000 tons a piece. I don't care how much people yell and scream that it was shipped off. Fact of the matter is that much material ain't going NO WHERE fast. More than enough time to wander over it at leisure, look at it. Notice things.

    Come on!!

  • @MrRexquando Don't you ever call me a bitch again, Nigga! Don't mess with me, Come on down to St. Louis to fight me and my brothers, we will fuck your nigga ass up

  • @MrRexquando Stop Fucking calling me Hotters or Azar. Stop it I am serious. Stop it!

  • @MrMelodia89 911 was a false flag attempt in order to Invade Iraq for oil. I'm not dumb to this games, these bitches are going to learn

  • @MrMelodia89 You know!! if you're going to take the time to send me a personal message? Don't be a little wimp and run away blocking me before i can reply. That's being a wimp shit.

    Man up dude!!

  • @roquefortfiles Why do you keep debunking the truth my nigga? What's wrong with you? Why did you call me a bitch earlier?

  • @roquefortfiles I can block you from making messages if I want to. Do you have a problem with that? Whats the matter? Are you going to start crying like a little Bitch? I am can do whatever I want so don't tell me what to do!

  • @MrMelodia89 You're nothing but an intellectual wimp. Man up!!

    You don't do little drive by's and run away. Have the balls to enter in to a debate, a discussion.

    But you don't. 

    You're a mental midget. An intellectual wimp.

    (I can do whatever i want.. whaaa whaaa..)

  • @roquefortfiles I am not a Fucking wimp so please don't call me that again. I am not a mental midget. You don't even know who I am so who the Fuck are you calling an intellectual wimp? What is that and what the Hell does that mean? I bet you don't even know the meaning of that word.

  • @MrMelodia89 Intellectual wimp: Someone who picks fights but doesn't stick around to deal with a rebuttal.

    I am here to discuss this topic. I am completely open to debate.

    But i don't like people who send me personal messages then skip town and block me from replying.

    Intellectually that's really wimpy.  Stand up and man up dude. What you did was the on line equivalent of going.. "ahalalalalalalalalalala"

  • @roquefortfiles Stop it! Quit calling me a Fucking wimp dude. I have the right to block whoever I want to and if you have a problem with it, too bad. That is your problem. I am willing to debate with you so what the Hell are you talking about? We are debating right now. Come on lets go. Lets debate.

  • @MrMelodia89 So post some intelligent observations!!

  • @roquefortfiles Look dude don't make me laugh! HA HA HA HA HA HA! Don't be made just because I blocked you from sending messages. Why are you being such a cry baby? HA HA HA HA! DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH PLEASE! HA HA HA!

  • @MrMelodia89  Your not funny idiot.

  • @showtheevidence90020 You are the idiot around here roquefortfiles not me! So stop with the BullShit already! Don't start with me!

  • @MrMelodia89 relax moron

  • @MrMelodia89 What the fuck dude? Stop accusing me of being different users.I came on here to watch the video, and got so irate(look it up) that i created an account to ask you why you spreading such bullshit.

  • @showtheevidence90020 I am not spreading any BullShit around here so what the Fuck are you talking about? I came to spread the truth and you people are still supporting the government. What the Hell is you guy's problem? Why can't you think for yourselves? You believe every nonsense told to you by the media!

  • @MrMelodia89 Yes you are. Everything you said was fucking bullshit. That's all truthers are BULLSHITERS

  • @showtheevidence90020 No its not! This is the truth and you are just mad because you can't handle it. Facts are stubborn. When you tell people the truth of things they get angry and defensive and that is exactly what is happening with you debunkers.

  • @MrMelodia89 I'm not mad at anything. I know the truth. If there was any depth to your claims why hasn't this came to a court yet?

    Because it's bullshit

  • @showtheevidence90020 You can't handle the truth so why don't you just do yourself a favor and be quiet? You don't know what you are talking about. You are just talking trash around here.

  • @Hotters7060BX talking trash?

    No that's up to you and your brothas.

  • @roquefortfiles No me and my brothers are here to fight for the truth!

  • @MrMelodia89 You know this about 3000 people dying. Maybe you could leave junior high behind.

  • @roquefortfiles And 9/11 was an inside job! 9/11 was an inside job! 9/11 was an inside job!

  • @MrMelodia89  Lick my sweaty bag

  • @MrMelodia89 Your stupidity motivated me to create an account. Where's the evidence buddy boy? Where is it? You don't have any, because there is none

  • @showtheevidence90020 What the Fuck are you talking about? What is your meaning of motivation? We have alot of evidence but you people are too stupid to acknowledge. Let me guess who this is! @Roquefortfiles, @MrRexquando, or is it @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890? Who the Fuck are you?

  • @MrMelodia89 You don't know the meaning of motivation? In other words, reading your comments, made me so mad, that i had to create an account to confront you. The shit your posting is ridicilous

  • @showtheevidence90020 Motivation my Ass @MrRexquando. You are full of Shit. You had to create another account just to spread your lies and distort the truth. The BullShit that you post is ridicolous. I am posting the truth and if you don't like it that is your problem.

  • @MrMelodia89 What the fuck is your problem? I'm not mrrexquando, you fucking retard. I want to know what evidence is their of controlled demoltion?

  • @MrMelodia89 I have one account douche bag. Your problem is mental illness that keeps you from comprehending the irrefutable evidence that is present to you. You have many accounts as we all know Azzers/Hotters/CNN/whatever it is today so looks like you have the "issues"

    sydney.edu. au /engineering/civil/wtc.s html (remove spaces)

    Go ahead and say the govt. paid them to say this. Keep denying your irrational paranoia. See how that works out for you.

  • @MrMelodia89 So because Conspiracy nut-cases are only 4% of the population it isn't hard to believe there will be more on the side of "reality" than people like you on the fantasy side of the debate. No multiple ID's needed to make you look silly.

  • @MrMelodia89 Nearly all of the steel was sent away to be recycled without being subjected to any

    serious forensic analysis.

    That's complete bullshit!! There are videos galore of specific column sections (ID'd down to the very floors of the crashes) being pulled aside and samples taken for analysis. They even ID'd floor brackets from the floors involved and examined those.

    You're completely full of shit. And you keep writing this stuff.

    HOW???. And I am a shill for this?

  • @roquefortfiles Nigga why must you debunk the truth that me and my brothers show you my nigga? Stop being a bitch. Open your eyes! Don't you ever call me a bitch again my nigga! Don't mess with me

  • @roquefortfiles This is not complete BullShit roquefortfiles so what the Hell are you talking about? You say that the steel being recycled is BullShit because you can't handle the truth. That is a fact and you know it. Why did these people in the government send all of that steel away before an investigation can be done on what caused the collapse of the Twin Towers?

  • @MrRexquando How do you explain thermite coming out of the south tower. Or what do you personally believe it was? I don't want videos, just your opinion

  • @Puppetmaster195skc So say it was (which you have no evidence it was thermite) then explain why there was NONE seen coming out of WTC1 or WTC7?

    Are you saying all the people claiming it was a missile or explosives are WRONG? I think even you claim people heard explosions. So you know thermite doesn't go "boom"

    Everyone agrees nothing got hot enough to melt steel yet thermite burns at 3500C?

    Are you saying this fire fighter is WRONG? watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4

  • @MrRexquando How does a passenger fly on a flight which never takes off on 911?

    Now this is impossible. This is where the tougher questions are needed. The passengers all disappeared and that, seamlessly, on 911. This is beyond dispute. And yet they never could have boarded a flight that did not take off. They might have conceivably purchased tickets for these flights, but they could have never actually gotten onto flight 11, boarded and then taken off.

  • @Alexjones67s Where does it end with you freaks? WHERE? The stuff you post is ridiculous.

    Lisa Frost was on U 175. They recovered a portion of her hip and her air miles card which she kept in her back pocket. Both returned to her family. Its on her dedication Web page.

  • @Alexjones67s So just more copy and paste from twoofer sites?

    "beforeitsnews.c o m/story/609/306/The_Four_Fligh­ts_of_9_11_What_Happened_to_th­e_Passengers.h t ml "

    Seriously I guess it makes sense that you don't think or use logic. You just swallow what the twoofer sites tell you to.

    messed up man

  • @MrRexquando The fact that a Spanish skyscraper is still standing after an intense

    fire consumed the steel and concrete tower for 24 hours provides real

    world evidence that fire alone does not cause high-rise towers to

    collapse.

  • @Alexjones67s How many sky scrapers can you name there weren't hit by 400,000 LB airplanes or burned for 7 hours with no fire fighters fighting the fires?

    Yes Zero is the correct answer. So a day of tragic firsts like everyone knows.

  • @MrRexquando As an intense fire consumed the 32-story Windsor Building in Madrid's

    business district, the press reports all began with the words "fear

    of collapse." After 24 hours, however, the tower, which was a similar

    construction to the twin towers of the World Trade Center, remained

    standing.

  • @Alexjones67s More twoofer copy and paste.

    Similar construction? Windsor had a concrete core WTC were steel-only cores. So not even close to similar.

    And as you know the steel structure of Windsor failed in 96 minutes leaving only the concrete core.

    "manchester.ac.uk/project/rese­arch/structures/strucfire/Case­Study/HistoricFires/BuildingFi­res/default.h t m"

  • @Puppetmaster195skc Puppet these people do not have any sense at all. There are still questions that need to be answered but these debunkers don't want answers to the most important questions.

    Roquefortfiles and MrRexquando both work for the government. They are paid shills.

  • @Alexjones67s I've recently started a job, and these trolls, will never see the light. When their in another building and it gets blown up, i wonder who their believe this time

  • @Alexjones67s Yes because anyone that doesn't agree with your fantasy is evil like the govt. Sounds kinda paranoid huh?

    Your making my case for me!

  • @MrRexquando Later endorsed by FEMA, It holds that the fires weakened flimsy trusses

    supporting the floors, causing the floors to fall on one another in a chain-reaction.

    This document examines fallacies in the official explanation:

    It is not consistent with the laws of physics.

    Its collapse scenario doesn’t look anything like the events we witnessed.

    It misrepresents engineering practices and the Twin Towers’ design.

    It was uninformed by any forensic analysis of the physical evidence.

  • @MrMelodia89 It is not consistent with the laws of physics.

    The floors have a load limit of a about 1500 tons. The top 31 stories rotates over and down on to the floors.

    You are now asking a floor rated to hold 1500 tons to hold 180,000 tons. Not only that but you are asking it to hold it in MOTION. Not stationary.

    That's like loading up your back with bricks to just the level you can support it then having your friend launch himself in to the air and land on you.

  • @MrMelodia89 More copy and paste waste my time.

  • @MrRexquando ~ "How can you justify your beliefs about this with zero evidence...?"

    This is proof that MrRexquando is a PAID DISINFO AGENT, ala Cass Sunstein. No one would be this persistent in starting from zero as if he didn't know the facts that were already shown to him 1,000 times.

    watch?v=-GUTmmqfmyg

    WTC 7 Freefall by David Chandler

    Let's see, what does the manual say.... 'Attack the expert's character'...'Attack the expert's findings'...'Change the subject'...

  • @ucancallmeOh You nor anyone else has shown any facts. Twoofer 101 "keep saying they have seen or know about the facts proving it was an inside job"

    Chandler has math errors

    Gage lies about his experts

    Jones won't share his data or dust samples and has to pay to get his papers published and thinks Haiti was an "inside job" with America creating an Earthquake machine

    Should I go on?

    Then you ignore the real experts

    civil.northwestern.ed u/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/46­­­­­6. pdf

  • @ucancallmeOh MrRexquando, and Roquefortfiles are both paid shills. They get paid to lie and give false information about the collapse of building 7 and the attacks on the Pentagon. These people probably work for the government and get paid to lie on the internet.

  • @MrMelodia89 MrRexquando, and Roquefortfiles are both paid shills

    No. We're just a hell of allot brighter than you.

  • @roquefortfiles And the both of you guys are not bright. You people are dumb and stupid. You are not willing to accept the Fucking truth!

  • @MrMelodia89 Right!! we're dumb and stupid. You yell and scream about no wing marks at the Pentagon and i explain to you the plane that hit the Empire State Building (Which is of VERY similar design to the Pentagon, heavy masonry with columns throughout).

    The B25 left a hole smaller than it was across. So did the 757 that hit the Pentagon.

    I don't think a missile hit the Empire State Building.

    But we're not bright!!

    (Fucking idiot!!)

  • @ucancallmeOh And lets not forget how you continually quote the "OS" is wrong meaning NIST yet you refuse to read it? People must laugh at you a lot!

    Put the bong down...

  • @roquefortfiles Retired General Major Albert Stubblebine says that after close examination of the Pentagon crash footage he can conclude no plane hit the building.

    Mr. Stubblebine claims to have extensive experience in intelligence operations, and used his analyzing skills to determine it was no plane

  • @wild0hawks Well he must be an idiot then.

    The NTSB have the data recorders and a 100 people witnessed it

  • @roquefortfiles I agree with everything that @Alexjones67 is saying because there are no answers to the most important questions of the most horrific crime that was committed 10 years ago. I definitely agree with @Alexjones67. Where is the wing damage at the Pentagon site? What is the government really hiding from us?

  • @wild0hawks The wing damage? Its hitting a 3 foot thick reinforced concrete wall.

    The plane that hit the Empire State building didn't leave any wing marks either. In fact if you account for its size the hole it left is perfectly consistent to the size of the aircraft.

    The same holds true for the Pentagon. 

  • @roquefortfiles At 9:49 a.m., the ten-ton, B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high.

  • @roquefortfiles Hole in Pentagon: 65 feet across.

    757 Wingspan: 124 feet, 10 inches.

    The plane does not fit!

  • @wild0hawks The wingspan of a B25 is 67 feet. When it hit the Empire state Building the hole was about 35 feet. The ESB and Pentagon are very similar construction.

    Does it make sense..?

    Duhh.. You bet it does.

  • @roquefortfiles Great comparison I never thought about that ratio.

  • @killalldumbasses878 Well.. I know what you mean! The first time I heard Bush claim that 19 hijackers took down 4 airplanes with boxcutters and knives, I thought it was a pretty ridiculous "Conspiracy Theory" and since then my feelings haven't changed due to the enormous amount of lies he has told to cover up each previous lie, and so on... Yes, I agree. There has been no REAL evidence to support his theory, just more bull! Unfortunate for all the families that lost loves!

  • Unbelievable....

  • You know what I just thought about

    PNAC and their manifesto is similiar to Mein Kampf..

  • I see that the professional "youtubers" have made their way over to this video too?! Hello MrRexnutcase, Roquefortfails, etc... I just love how dedicated you all are! Must have a lot of time on your hands that allows you to make your way to almost every video on youtube that is against the official story? Quite interesting, one would think that you wouldn't find this extra time being experts and all?! But of course! LMAO!

  • @Tricky1ish The official story told by our government is BullShit and @roquefortfiles, and @MrRexquando know that. No steel framed buildings can collapse just because of an airplane crash. 9/11 was an inside job.

  • @MrMelodia89 You hear Robertson say that the airplane crashes were over and above what they had designed for. you heard him say the fuel was never a consideration. no 707 would be landing with a full fuel tank and it wouldn't be doing 560mph.

    Are you people fucking mentally impaired??????????????????????­??????????????????????????????­????

  • @MrMelodia89 Definitely! They are just losers! Probably all sucking their thumbs while they rock back and forth in their chairs waiting for one of us to say something so that they can reply with their ongoing stupidity! I actually feel very sorry for all of them!

  • @MrMelodia89 Definitely! Without a doubt in my mind!

  • @Tricky1ish You guys all collectively need a brain transplant..

    Some of the dumbest shit i have ever read on this topic. You're all brain dead as far as I am concerned.

  • @roquefortfiles And how the Fuck did the 19 hijackers manage to create molten iron at ground zero? How do you explain how these 19 hijackers knocked down building number 7 in a controlled demolition fashion? And how did 19 hijackers crash an airplane into the Pentagon when apparent the hijacker for flight 77 could not Fucking fly at all?

  • Archaeology is the search for fact... not truth. If it's truth you're looking for, Dr. Tyree's philosophy class is right down the hall. -Indiana Jones...... I am of the 9/11 FACT movement and the FACTS point to Osama Bin Laden, Ayaman Al-Zuahari, Khalid Sheikh Muhammad and the 19 other cock suckers who actually executed the thing. RIP to the fallen 3000

  • @CompletenUtterStoner ~ The fallen 3,000 will not RIP until the truth is known and justice is brought to bear on the real perpetraitors.

  • @ucancallmeOh We must fight for justice. We cannot continue with these lies forever. The truth about 9/11 must be told. The airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center was used as a cover up from the reality that these buildings were set to be demolished by some type of explosives. Yes the airplane crashes did alot of damage, but it was not enough to bring the Twin Tower straight down like that.

  • When there is finally 9/11 Justice, we will find out which of the debunkers were just brainwashed and which were PAID DISINFORMATION AGENTS. The latter group will hopefully will be charged with aiding and abetting mass murder and genocide.

  • @ucancallmeOh What about the people like you that spread the lies? How about the PODS debate? You comment on a video saying there were missile PODS under the planes but say that of course wasn't possible that it was thermite. Your deluded.

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ I already explained it to you on that website: There is more than enough evidence for charges of mass murder and starting two wars without cause. Just like in most murder cases, there is sufficient evidence to proceed however 100% of the story is not known.

    I don't know what happened to the planes, the people on the planes, the phone calls, etc.

    I do know that WTC 7 was an implosion/ CD and that nanothermite and iron microspheres were found in the dust of WTC.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @ae911truthcensors Think about man! The events of 9/11 is not what the government says it. How could building 7 collapse straight down just because of fires or debris from the North Tower? That building fell straight down and it was not even hit by an airplane. Towers 1 and 2 got hit by airplanes but what about building number 7? Something to think about right?

  • @MrMelodia89 it was not even hit by an airplane.

    It was hit by TONS of WTC debris. In fact i have read that that building was being pummeled with debris the moment the jets hit the buildings. From the very start of the whole thing. SEng's said when it was inspected prior to collapse it was in bad shape. Elevators had been punted down hallways, columns had disconnected from flooring. It was creaking and groaning all day. Had a 12 story gash taken out of it. 

  • @MrMelodia89 It was an all steel building that burned for 6+ hours with zero fire-fighters putting any water on it? Think about it man!

    Has any all steel structure burned for 6 hours with no fire-fighting and not collapsed?

    If it wasn't fires what was it?

    Thermite?

    Explosives?

    Dustification Beams?

    *

    So was George Bush behind this collapse watch?v=AN0uFcGKe8M

    Nano thermite responsible for that one too?

    Think about it man!

  • @ae911truthcensors Why did we invade Iraq for? Why? What does Iraq have to do with 9/11 and why did we even go there if the government claims that the 19 hijackers who flew the airplanes were from Saudi Arabia? What the Hell were we doing all the way in Iraq?

  • @MrMelodia89 Do you read anything? Iraq was a mistake based on bad intel about WMDs.. Wow you are really not informed are you.

  • Lots of twoofers who are commenting here urged me to watch this guys video proving WTC7 was controlled demolition: watch?v=k8VAsoVuShM

    Like PT Barnum said "There's a sucker born every minute"

  • @MrMelodia89 wtc 2 does not fail at the core. it fails at the exterior columns. there is a rotational point on the building and it is directly opposite the location of the aircraft impacts. This rotational fulcrum does not drop it rotates around a pivot point. this places the upper 31 floors of the building on to the floor areas instead of being supported by the columns (But they have failed). There is no floor system in the world that is going to carry 31 floors worth.

  • @roquefortfiles watch?v=9SSS0DDqfm0 shows what you are talking about.

  • @roquefortfiles The Air Force was running multiple war games on the morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings over the continental United States that included (at least) one "live-fly" exercise as well as simulations that placed "false blips" on FAA radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events of 9/11 to the point of the Air Force running drills involving hijacked aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded.

  • @CNNFootage63 Well unless you would like to hurl major's Duff and Nasty, who were the pilots dispatched to intercept American 11, under the train and say their story is a lie then your story has absolutely no relevance to the topic.

    You keep saying you're interested in truth. You're full shit. You're not. I urge you to go and read the time lines of the aircraft involved. When things were known.. When fighters were called.

    they had 10 mins to get there.

    Good luck !!

  • Comment removed

  • @Reinvestiage911obama I totally agree with you man. Lets talk in private.

  • I was previously a debunker, but because of the many doubts I have regarding 911, I'm no longer a debunker. I'm not saying i'm a truther, but i'm saying this.

    We need a reinvestiagion into 911, steel was not checked for explosives, and to me it seems like a hush, hush, situation.

  • You know how the 9/11 Commission Official Report report was a cover-up, right? Well, I just learned something yesterday: NIST is under the Chamber of Commerce. (It was Zelikow from the Chamber of Commerce who oversaw the 9/11 Commission). Connect the dots!

    You debunkers even admitted that you didn't believe NIST's explanation of WTC 7's collapse: "normal office fires".

    Bring on the criminal court case for mass murder!

  • @ucancallmeOh 9/11 was an inside job and I can't believe that people can't use common sense. What is happening to our people today? Why are people losing their logic here? What happened to common sense?

  • @CNNFootage63 Common sense is screaming terrorists with planes and oncontained fires.

    Do you have evidence it was something else?

    I think your anti-govt hatred has you blinded like so many sheep.

  • @MrRexquando Well plane crashes did not destroy these 2 massive buildings. Explosives were placed in these buildings. Fires or jet fuel have never before or after September 11th caused big steel framed buildings to fall and turn to dust just like that.

  • @wild0hawks How many steel framed buildings have been hit by 767's before?

  • @MrRexquando Stop denying the truth my nigga! Me and My brothers have shown you a mountain of evidence but you still deny it. What's wrong with you? Does the truth hurt? Does it feel real bad? Need a advil? Come on niggas! Think, my nigga! Think!

  • @Hotters70652XTY Don't know if it hurts.. You never show it. Your "brothers" are figures of your imagination. Like your multiple IDS Azure/CNN/Meldian/Tricky1ish/o­thers

    You need help

  • Comment removed

  • @MrRexquando EastSide Nuthood Crips Bitch! My nigga!

    Who the fuck do you think your talking to like that?

    I don't need help. You need help My nigga!

    Me and my brothers are telling the truth whether you like it or not!

    Don't start with me, my nigga!

  • @Hotters70652XTY Why don't you drop that Nigga bullshit. If you want to discuss.. discuss. But shelve the BS.

  • @roquefortfiles Who the hell do you think your talking to like that nigga? Look, we can talk 911, but you need to cut the dumb shit out nigga! Your being disrespectful, my nigga! You shouldn't do that. Me and my brothers are hear to fight for truth , whether you like it or not.

  • Comment removed

  • @Tricky1ish The truth has to come out. We were lied to and it obvious but so many Americans are so brainwashed that they are blinded by the lies of the government. I would hate to see this country go down the drain because of politicial decisions.

  • @MrRexquando 9/11 was an inside job. Why did our government lie to us and invaded Iraq?

  • @MrMelodia89 So you can't say it was an inside job without some kind of proof can you?

    Iraq had nothing to do with 911. Iraq as you know was about the mistaken belief that Iraq had WMDs. Read a book dude.

    So your wrong again.

  • @MrRexquando How can building number 7 fall straight down like a controlled demolition just by fire and damage alone? How is that possible? It is only possible with explosives.

  • @MrMelodia89 No one heard/saw explosives did they?

    watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4 Looks like it was a bad fire that damaged the structure of the building.

    watch?v=-UuXFHoX9oQ doesn't look like straight down to anyone.

    So your wrong again.

  • @MrRexquando It is time for the truth to come out. It is not fair that we are just sitting around thinking that our government cares about is when all they did was lied to us about the events that took place in New York City and the invasion of Iraq. It is time that we as a nation stand up and ask the right questions and demand the right answers. It is time that we put our heads togehter.

  • @MrRexquando And plus one of the alleged hijackers by the name of Hanjour could not fly an airplane at all. So how could Hanjour or whatever his name is, crash the airplane into the Pentagon without know how to fly? Hanjour could not handle flight 77 so what hit the Pentagon?

  • @MrMelodia89 Why do you say he couldn't fly? He had a license. Looks like your spreading bad information: 11-s.e u.or g/11-s/pgimeno-hanjour-li c-comercial.j p g

    He was a bad pilot. He descending too fast in an "overspeed" condition with the 757 so bad it trashed out the starboard engine.

    So your wrong again.

  • @MrRexquando Can you atleast agree for a reinvestigaion into 911?

  • @Reinvestiage911obama Sure. Re-investigate by who? Based on what evidence?

    Do you know all the independent investigations that have already gone through the WTC complex?

    sydney.edu. au /engineering/civil/wtc.s ht ml (remove spaces) obviously not connect with the US govt.

    civil.northwestern.ed u/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/46­­­­­6. pdf

    tms.? o rg? /pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/­­­­eagar-0112.ht m l

  • @MrRexquando Some things are so disturbing that they are almost impossible to believe. That is why, in the 9/11 enigma, less is more. - Until these questions are answered there is no need to establish more doubt. What we have here is solid undisputed evidence that we were never told the truth.

  • @MrRexquando One of the most incriminating pieces of evidence against George w. Bush (that he had prior knowledge of 911) is the FACT that he just sat there on the morning of September 11th, 2001 upon hearing that America was under attack when a second airplane flew into the South Tower at 9:03 a.m.

  • @MrRexquando No president would just sit idly in a chair after hearing that "AMERICA IS UNDER ATTACK" unless he knew before hand what was going to happen. George W. Bush KNEW! In fact, the mountain of evidence overwhelmingly reveals that the Bush administration was instrumental in orchestrating the 911 attacks.

  • @MrMelodia89 yet the official version has never changed;

    Right. Because running two 767's at full power in to two buildings is just too damn hard to understand

    Like standing back and going... "Well if you think THAT was the reason!!"

    How difficult is it to understand? A mentally retarded person could grasp this.

  • My Opinion of 911 is a very mixed one indeed. Although I have no opinion or idea about who caused this attack i will say, that much of the attack can be blamed on the government for not enforcing an alert, nor warning of such attack.Things such as building 7 often have me wonder whether was this a planned attack in order to Invade Iraq? Or was it a result of a massive 108 story tower falling on it? The only sure way to know is to reinvestiage every possible scenario.