0:50-0:57 "...and nothing is further from the truth".
Actually, Simon, I'd suggest that labelling a NON-SMACKING parent as one who is "violent, who bashes and assaults kids" would be even further from the truth than YOUR being labelled as such.
before you all go having hissy fits, tell me that YOU weren't spanked as a child. These laws are just downright ridiculous. And if you think that this should be against the law, read this: $
@OverActives oops, not that. what i meant to post was that an innocent grandmother had her grandson at the store and he was about to run into a busy street. she grabbed his arm (he was 3 years old) to save him. The police witnessed this event and said they were giving her a warning, but if it happened again, she would be prosecuted. ISNT THAT HORRIBLE?!
You can create boundaries for your children without resorting to physical violence. "Smacking" hurts. What are you teaching your kids with each smack? "It's ok to hurt another person and make them do what you want, as long as you're bigger than them."
@frazma, you're blind, and I pity your ignorance.... also, do I hear and atheist agenda? FYI, it has always been against the law to hit kids.... get it? Ok? Right then, what does Bradford's bill do? Punish good parents, that's all - it serves no other conceivable purpose.
Well done Simon! Your wife and girls should be very proud of you for speaking up on behalf of over 80% of New Zealanders! As parents ourselves of two young children, we too are offended by Sue Bradford's suggestion that we don't know the difference between a smack for correction purposes and a beating. WE ARE NOT CRIMINALS for lovingly raising our children with boundaries. If John Key doesn't listen to the majority of NZ'ers and throw this bill out, I will remember this at the next election
0:50-0:57 "...and nothing is further from the truth".
Actually, Simon, I'd suggest that labelling a NON-SMACKING parent as one who is "violent, who bashes and assaults kids" would be even further from the truth than YOUR being labelled as such.
Cotdail 7 months ago
before you all go having hissy fits, tell me that YOU weren't spanked as a child. These laws are just downright ridiculous. And if you think that this should be against the law, read this: $
OverActives 2 years ago
@OverActives oops, not that. what i meant to post was that an innocent grandmother had her grandson at the store and he was about to run into a busy street. she grabbed his arm (he was 3 years old) to save him. The police witnessed this event and said they were giving her a warning, but if it happened again, she would be prosecuted. ISNT THAT HORRIBLE?!
OverActives 2 years ago
Vote YES to stop Simon from smashing his kids
runningwithscisso 2 years ago
You can create boundaries for your children without resorting to physical violence. "Smacking" hurts. What are you teaching your kids with each smack? "It's ok to hurt another person and make them do what you want, as long as you're bigger than them."
fubukiki 2 years ago 3
Simon, I could hug you! YOU ROCK!
@theboygiggles, right on!
@frazma, you're blind, and I pity your ignorance.... also, do I hear and atheist agenda? FYI, it has always been against the law to hit kids.... get it? Ok? Right then, what does Bradford's bill do? Punish good parents, that's all - it serves no other conceivable purpose.
wired500 2 years ago
Well done Simon! Your wife and girls should be very proud of you for speaking up on behalf of over 80% of New Zealanders! As parents ourselves of two young children, we too are offended by Sue Bradford's suggestion that we don't know the difference between a smack for correction purposes and a beating. WE ARE NOT CRIMINALS for lovingly raising our children with boundaries. If John Key doesn't listen to the majority of NZ'ers and throw this bill out, I will remember this at the next election
MrSonshine123 2 years ago
It always has been against the law to hit kids. However it's important to realise that the words smack and hit mean different things entirely.
theboybiggles 2 years ago