@xXSimonJCPXx -- Nope, just noting that a video on the internet isn't actually proof of anything. The burden of proof for this isn't on me, it's on the people making the claim. So far they haven't fulfilled their burden of proof.
@xXSimonJCPXx Yes, ghonorrhea does not exist either. A tree does not make a sound if it falls in a forest if no one is there to hear it. The sun turns off at night. Yes, question everything. Simon, I'm 3 times your age and have seen some things in my career that would boggle your mind. I can assure you that nuclear weapons of all sorts exist. Believe whatever you want. Look up asinine and see if it fits.
if they don't exist then what was the cold war, the cuban missile crisis and the iran-contra scandel about? theres literaly overwhelming evidence that nukes are real, whats the point of lying about it? what is the reason that all the nuclear countries are lying about it?
The Atomic Annie shown in this video was built specially to fire the 800 pound nuclear mortar shell. You should not compare a baby sized cannon to it. I could look up the weight of the cannon, but my recollection is that it was over 40 tonnes. A small cannon cannot fire at the velocity the Annie was made to. Also you must consider frame rate, and camera position; also concealing of the shell by the smoke ploom.
@aardvark9100 I believe you. Not that you needed my acknowledgement to validate you, of course you know what you are talking about that is quite evident. I havent ever heard of the nuke/atomic bomb "hoax". My first thought was, "oh here they go again, getting ppl spending senseless time on chasing the perverbial psy ops ghost". Thank you 4 ur info, I will stop @ this vid' & pay the subject no more of my priceless time. Be Blessed, Be Well & Be Always @ Peace. =^-^=
@aardvark9100 axactly, too often do people think that they will see a cannon shell, or a bullet, when they slow down old footage or poorly filmed footage, you cant get fifty slides from a camera that was able to take 30, slow it down all you want it wont make a difference.
@Rcoxx4u maybe the fact that one warhead took out most of a city, when regular conventional bombs can't come anywhere CLOSE to that, even the MOAB or Daisey Cutter could't do that. Ignoring that, the area hit stays eradiated for upto and past the half-life of what ever element whas used, soo 20+ years nowadays.
1) first video was of the Chinese atomic cannon. they faked allot so that one wouldn't surprise me.
2) the second video just showed a very fast bullet that could have been edited before you got it.
3) U-235 is an unstable atom it decays at a half life of 703,800,000 years Einstein came up for the equation of E=mc² this person clearly does not have an IQ over 100 let alone an IQ that can say that Einstein is wrong.
I have watched many cannons fire many rounds live, not old VHS tape. I rarely can see anything, and never at the barrel. You have to look downrange, and this tape is just not high enough resolution. I you video 20, you may see 4 rounds in flight.
The explosion effects were widely available in Hollywood from such movies as "War of the Worlds". Does anyone here doubt that Luke Skywalker destroyed the "Death Star"? We all saw The Death Star destroyed!! So it must have happened, and it looked way more real than these USA govermnent propaganda films....LOL
@weissmag except every physicist alive is not supporting the fact that the Death star was blown up. HOWEVER, all physicist do confirm that nuclear bombs are not only possible but REAL and have been detonated thousands of times.
It is a logical fallacy to dismiss each piece of evidence individually when how such dismissal could not apply with other evidence. You must assess all evidence together.
It's obstinate foolishness to claim nuclear bombs don't exist.
Did you ever think about the angle you moron? The atomic artillery camera position is much more faced towards the back of the artillery piece than the other clip you had which was faced much more towards the side. The flash and smoke of the atomic artillery blocked out the shell being fired. End of story. Go talk to the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki if you don't believe me. Oh, wait. They died of nuclear holocaust and radiation, never mind.
You really expect to be able to see a cannon shell from a <32FPS camera?
Perhaps you'd like to be a little nearer the receiving end- you might get a better picture of the shell as it gets there. And a slightly better sense of the effects of radiation poisoning from the same.
As an experiment I emailed the 'Oxford Research Group' which Frank Barnaby, a supposed expert, run or ran; plus various associates listed on their website - john sloboda, paul rogers, hamit dardagan, chris abbott, fiona harrison, andy roberts, thomas phipps, rosie holdsworth. Barnaby was foolish enough to reply once, obviously a poltical mistake. None of the others have replied....
A comparison is shown here between a normal cannon and a new atomic cannon. Both are shot from different angles. The atomic cannon is a tighter shot with far more smoke emitting from the firing. We also don't know the frame rate of each film so just because no bullet is seen existing the muzzle doesn't mean it wasn't there. More pseudoscience drawing false conclusions.
Yes vuturistic, the footage of this explosion dates back to 1953.
In 1953 the speed at which the camera was filming would not have been consistent with the speed at which the projectile was firing (2060ft per second).
The 15 kiloton nuclear device shown here, detonated over 10,000 meters from the cannon.
That cannon is sitting down the road from here at the War Museum in Hampton, Virginia. Serial No. 1 of 1. You can ride it if you want. ....Actually, there's a sign specifically telling you not to, but if I did everything a sign told me to do, I'd never have gotten to meet Lucy Liu. Psh, private residence no trespassing my ass.
P.S. When's the last time you've seen a bullet when it was fired (ultra slow-mo cameras don't count)?
Here's a fun experiment, take a firearm, record the shot on a camera, try to slow down the film and see the bullet fired. You can't because the bullet is moving at such a high velocity that it has left the field of vision between frames. Bullets are fast kid.
Wow, so I am guessing you can see a bullet fly out of a gun when its shot. Hmm you cant? Try slow motion, oh there it is, but you only see it for 1 or 2 frames.
Too bad back when they fired this cannon they didnt have the tech we have today to film this with super clear high speed camera.
Your not the smartest cookie ay. Think about it... the smoke and fire take 1 second to clear the picture, with a projectile travelling the speed of sound your not gonna see it. esspecially on this old footage when cameras weren't so accurate.
come on, seriously. if you put footage of a handgun being fired on 'super slow motion' would you expect to see the bullitt? why do you expect it here? and if we are testing these bombs in the context of a cold war, why wouldn't we give disinfo to our enemies by making them believe we can shoot it as artillery?
i don't think we landed on the moon, i know 9/11 was a fraud, but this does not constitute any sort of evidence. you're grasping at straws
It makes sense now. Nature would work that way with all that energy - or else we'd be toast along time ago. Right? I geuss that these neg. commenters do'nt know their own nature well enough to identify with nature/reality. The kind that look at '9/11' & the 'physics' sits perfectly well with them! HAHA! Zombies......
What do these motherfuckers think Kubrick's 'Dr.Strangelove' was about. I'll tell you. 'THEM' (like the commenters) the ignorant souless fuck-tard on the planet in a satire!
There are nuclear bombs, but they don't work like we think they work.A nuke must be ground based, not airborn, and can only detonate 2 times a year.This is because it uses a harmonic relationship between the Earth's core, the sun and the device. The sun is only in position twice a year in any given spot on Earth. It's a worldwide freemasonic conspiracy to keep popluations in fear and to allow standing armies to exist. Supposedly the Jesuits have a device planted in every major city in the world.
Retard, a nuclear bomb is caused by uranium or plutonium reaching its criticak mass therefore causing an explosion... you idiot, there has been many many more than two nuclear explosions in 1 year.
The retards you meet on the internet... am i wrong guys?
You misread my comment, I said "The sun is only in position twice a year in any given spot on Earth." That means a nuclear device can be detonated in a specific place twice a year, therefore theoretically there could a constant detonation of nuclear devices as long as they are placed and detonated precisely with the movement of the sun. So there can be an infanite number of nuclear explosions on or in Earth in a one year span, not just two.
It's fine for you to not like the US military, and it's even fine for you to blame them for things, however a video from ebaumsworld is hardly proof of anything other than the fact that you are too fanatically convinced of your conclusion to even consider the possibility of being wrong.
Let's consider this shit while Obama declares martial law. Perhaps the chinese are mad at americans because they were sworn to secrecy? I'll be doing extensive research.
You can plainly see the reflection of the flash on the gun barrel...........You people who believe in a fake nuclear world can do without your toaster with its nuclear powered electrical grid system....Oh thats right, you think your toaster is powered by little tiny magical fairies.
You're just pretending to not see such an obvious atomic bullet. Next thing youll be telling me you didnt see it land either. You know what. I smell a loose rass cannon.
Have you ever heard of a thing called 'frames per second'? its how many frames a camera can capture in a second, some artillery shells can exceed 1600 m/s, now you try and film something travelling at 1600 m/s with a camera that only films at like 15 f.p.s That would be like trying to capture a bullet on a phone camera.
can you see through the smoke cloud. Those cameras didnt have super slo-mo they couldnt slow down that much. I can't see through a cloud of smoke and fire.
You can 'slow it down further still' but you can't add frames to the original video. The original video didn't have the frame rate to be sure to catch the projectile. No big mystery. Not saying whether the video is real or not, just saying that your argument is stupid.
According to your logic in the video, the smoke didn't come out of the cannon either. It OBVIOUSLY just appeared in a large ball around the cannon. Or was placed there in post. You never actually saw the smoke 'come out' of the cannon. FAIL
In 1953 when this particular test was conducted the speed of the cameras that where used to film the test could not keep up with the speed at which the projectile was fired, the photographic technology was nothing in comparison to today's standereds.
Ask anyone who works with ballistics. By the time you see the smoke, the projectile has already left the barrel. These were fired with the same kind of explosive used on naval ships and not the lower power stuff used by field artillery. The reason is *distance*. Now, having been *at* a test, any nitwit who says atomic bombs do not exist is too young by far and far too gullible.
I would suggest you take a peek at the book, "The Secret War". Apparently the nuclear pioneers found the whole prospect of a nuclear bomb just a tad ludicrous. So, who invented it?
Don't "quote mine" like the creationist crowd does. Sir. Teller said the "notion of the atomic bomb as a weapon of war is ludicrous", not that the existance of the bomb was ludicrous.
It's really laughable how you are trying to find the "proofs" of what you say...
The "old" cannon is obviously more powerfull than the one you took for the "proof" (look at the size), and even with this one, the bullet appears (luckily) on only one frame...
So with a little logic and intelligence you could see, even with your poor ones, that this doesn't prove anything...
Aw excuse me that's true, logic and intelligence are obviously also a conspiracy...
Kaiten0202 yes Tokyo was almost totaly destroyed by normal bombs, but, that has nothing to do with the atomic bomb because Tokyo was never bombed by an atomic bomb, idiot.
You do realize that it would shoot out of that cannon way to fast to be seen, you would have needed to record it with a high fps camera and THEN play it in slow motion. DIPSHIT. Of course something fucking came out of it because of the spark and the fact that the cannon moves back. Stupid ass.
Cannon technology was better 50 years ago than today? They shot faster? And the spark and the recoil point to the charge in the round, not whether the round was empty or not. Blanks in a gun still kick and fire. I don't know whether or not atomic bombs exist, but your reasons for believing something had to come out of that cannon don't hold water.
Ohh, you dum kid. You should read the world history. Shame on you! Maybe some videos, which are given by government, are false, but we all know that there was Chirosima and thousands of dead. Find the historical videos about Chirosima, you will see how it looks, and then tell us, that atomic bombs does NOT EXIST. Lol
there are no nuclear bombs--the government simply employs chuck norris and has to do a cover up. Wouldnt you lie about a bomb if it kept you out of chuck norris's way?
well.its a different kind of cannon u nub.!.the first one is a umm wat u call this....i forget the 2nd one is an artillery.go get a life.or go ask the army to make it easier.
heres the flaw. maybe the first cannon's rocket was too fast for the video to capture. and the second cannon, is a totally different cannon model then the first one so it doesnt justify much. the camera in the second one may be better and the rocket itself may be slower.
The shell from that gun was travelling at around 2000km/h. That camera takes 52 shots a second. In around 1/52nd of a second the shell would have travelled around 540 meters. The diameter of that shell was around 15 inches, a bit bigger than a football. Can you see a football from half a kilometer away? I'd be surprised since you CANT EVEN SEE THE FACTS!
once again you astound me with your apparant lack of attention. i would like to point out that your theory once a gaping hole in . the film was not taken with hi speed photography in mind. so it is not suprising that you do not see a projectile.
well i have watched the whole series of the videos supporting that argument..
i must admit that in some point some videos were FAKE..
however this does not necessarily implies that atomic bombs do no exist..
there was a time during cold war where these fake vids might have been released for political reasons.. but atomic chain reaction is a reality and atomic bombs do exist..
I would agree with your statments. It is possible they faked certain aspects of shots or made things appear bigger and badder then they really were just to put more fear into the Russians or any other country for that matter. These are very real and nasty weapons that I wish never were invented.
but why they fake the movies if atomic bomb exist? It isn`t an evidence of a fraud? Only political reasons? And the man on the moon they did the same ? If u have more fake videos please send the adreess iam very interted in this tems. Thank you.
@newschatter I have the same feeling about a line being crossed. In the movie "trinity and beyond" which I feel is a flat out modern day Military funded film (with William Shatner as host) The "inventor" of the Hydrogen Bomb states they needed to understand basically what they had done, and this was 1951, it was still possibly all a big mis-hap, too dangerous to continue, so hence forth came the propaganda counter films of the Hydrogen era.? Is this plausable?
I visted ICBM missle silos while in the air force. I can assure you sir they are very real and functional weapons. Ever hear of a mirv bus? They really do exist and are capable of killing millions. Why would they build hundreds of working rockets to carry a weapon that doesn't work? The missles themselves wouldn't function.What would be the point?
Dude. I can say- good imagination. Maybe the video about atomic bombs are fake, but the bombs do exist. How do u explain Hiroshima and Nagasaki? And radiation consequences? Though, nice idea.
to serbprideworldwide77 - why they did it on Hiroshima and Nagasaki instead of Tokio? To have radiations diseases you dont need an Atomic Bomb Cesio is enougth
Why bomb Tokyo? Bomb secondary cities and give them time to think about a surrender? The reasons are countless. This is one of your reasons for not your theory? Your mental.
People who are so unhappy with their own lives often belive things like this or even partake in making them up. They have to blame the unfair evil world for why things are not going their way. The motive for this is beyond me except you are just mental.
So all the ICMB silos I visited while in the Air Force were put there to keep this grand illusion? If this were remotely true, third world nation's such as Iran would expose it to show how weak the US really is.Who's to say your not the one doctoring these films? Get a life.
I don't pretend to know everything there is to know about Nuclear science, however I know more than the average. I for one don't feel that there is any evidance these videos are fraudulent in way. As I was watching your video I realized that as it begins to play in slow motion it seemed, at certain parts, there were frames missing as though someone manually edited the film or even digitally removed certain frames. It seems someone either the author or "Moonshow" edited this video as I said.
Upshot-Knothole, Shot Grable was conducted during 1953, barely 5 years after the introduction of the colour camera. Upon firing, the 11in M9 projectile adopted a velocity of 526 meters per second. That's over 1800km/h. With the frame rate of the old camera, there is no possible way it would have been able to pick up the projectile leaving the weapon. The reason why this test created a precursor was because of the trajectory and sheer velocity before detonation. Explain that you moron.
If you know anything about the basic concept of how a nuke works from the internet today, this video is a fake.
Psystorm852 3 weeks ago
nukes dont exist. good vid
yourmajezty 8 months ago
@xXSimonJCPXx -- Nope, just noting that a video on the internet isn't actually proof of anything. The burden of proof for this isn't on me, it's on the people making the claim. So far they haven't fulfilled their burden of proof.
Tavereen 10 months ago
@xXSimonJCPXx Yes, ghonorrhea does not exist either. A tree does not make a sound if it falls in a forest if no one is there to hear it. The sun turns off at night. Yes, question everything. Simon, I'm 3 times your age and have seen some things in my career that would boggle your mind. I can assure you that nuclear weapons of all sorts exist. Believe whatever you want. Look up asinine and see if it fits.
kimmer6 11 months ago
Fzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
gurda3da3 11 months ago
Yeah this is accepted as a fake.
PeekyBooo 11 months ago
AFM, Moonshow, Jessewaugh, TVOW, Revisionist, YOU DO NOT EXIST.
kimmer6 1 year ago
if they don't exist then what was the cold war, the cuban missile crisis and the iran-contra scandel about? theres literaly overwhelming evidence that nukes are real, whats the point of lying about it? what is the reason that all the nuclear countries are lying about it?
shotguns1994 1 year ago
The Atomic Annie shown in this video was built specially to fire the 800 pound nuclear mortar shell. You should not compare a baby sized cannon to it. I could look up the weight of the cannon, but my recollection is that it was over 40 tonnes. A small cannon cannot fire at the velocity the Annie was made to. Also you must consider frame rate, and camera position; also concealing of the shell by the smoke ploom.
aardvark9100 1 year ago
@aardvark9100 I believe you. Not that you needed my acknowledgement to validate you, of course you know what you are talking about that is quite evident. I havent ever heard of the nuke/atomic bomb "hoax". My first thought was, "oh here they go again, getting ppl spending senseless time on chasing the perverbial psy ops ghost". Thank you 4 ur info, I will stop @ this vid' & pay the subject no more of my priceless time. Be Blessed, Be Well & Be Always @ Peace. =^-^=
HigherWaysWoman 1 year ago
@aardvark9100 axactly, too often do people think that they will see a cannon shell, or a bullet, when they slow down old footage or poorly filmed footage, you cant get fifty slides from a camera that was able to take 30, slow it down all you want it wont make a difference.
Xwannagod 1 year ago
Yes they are fake why does not the US or anyone else ever use one since the fabled WW2 Japanese(carpet bombs)?
It is one of the biggest cons ever.
"Push the button"
I dare everyone; North Korea, USA, USSR, China, UK, Germany, France, Afghanistan, Pakistan.. Its all an illusion.
Rcoxx4u 1 year ago
@Rcoxx4u maybe the fact that one warhead took out most of a city, when regular conventional bombs can't come anywhere CLOSE to that, even the MOAB or Daisey Cutter could't do that. Ignoring that, the area hit stays eradiated for upto and past the half-life of what ever element whas used, soo 20+ years nowadays.
Xwannagod 1 year ago
I agree with you ,I have always have this feeling that atom bombs do not exist
kamaal1982 1 year ago
Please tell me you are not trying to say that the atomic bomb was never invented!
TheBaldmeister 1 year ago
oh, you are all wrong, the bomb is invisible, that's what they will tell us on Fox fake news, ha ha! Good vid my friend, Keep up the good work.
AntimatterRadio 1 year ago
The next thing your going to tell us is that Three Mile Island was a "fake" nuclear accident.
faffaflunkie 1 year ago
fake FAKE FAKE they are the big "secret weapon" that doesn't exist.
friedchickenlittle 1 year ago 7
1) first video was of the Chinese atomic cannon. they faked allot so that one wouldn't surprise me.
2) the second video just showed a very fast bullet that could have been edited before you got it.
3) U-235 is an unstable atom it decays at a half life of 703,800,000 years Einstein came up for the equation of E=mc² this person clearly does not have an IQ over 100 let alone an IQ that can say that Einstein is wrong.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@colek711 And it depends on the frame rate the footage is being filmed at.
freqazoidiac 1 year ago
I have watched many cannons fire many rounds live, not old VHS tape. I rarely can see anything, and never at the barrel. You have to look downrange, and this tape is just not high enough resolution. I you video 20, you may see 4 rounds in flight.
Brantoc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
did you even notice the size difference in the "howitzers,"of course you can't see it, the larger one has WAAAAAY more gasses escaping from it!!!!!
evanmcorleytv 1 year ago
Comment removed
evanmcorleytv 1 year ago
The explosion effects were widely available in Hollywood from such movies as "War of the Worlds". Does anyone here doubt that Luke Skywalker destroyed the "Death Star"? We all saw The Death Star destroyed!! So it must have happened, and it looked way more real than these USA govermnent propaganda films....LOL
weissmag 1 year ago
@weissmag except every physicist alive is not supporting the fact that the Death star was blown up. HOWEVER, all physicist do confirm that nuclear bombs are not only possible but REAL and have been detonated thousands of times.
It is a logical fallacy to dismiss each piece of evidence individually when how such dismissal could not apply with other evidence. You must assess all evidence together.
It's obstinate foolishness to claim nuclear bombs don't exist.
Treblaine 1 year ago
Israel says they have no nukes. They want everyone else to disarm their nukes. And the Israelis would like us to believe nukes don't exist.
NorseMaiden 1 year ago
Did you ever think about the angle you moron? The atomic artillery camera position is much more faced towards the back of the artillery piece than the other clip you had which was faced much more towards the side. The flash and smoke of the atomic artillery blocked out the shell being fired. End of story. Go talk to the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki if you don't believe me. Oh, wait. They died of nuclear holocaust and radiation, never mind.
Tsauruvia 2 years ago
You really expect to be able to see a cannon shell from a <32FPS camera?
Perhaps you'd like to be a little nearer the receiving end- you might get a better picture of the shell as it gets there. And a slightly better sense of the effects of radiation poisoning from the same.
ykarpov 2 years ago
Congratulations, you're a retard!
Banano79 2 years ago
As an experiment I emailed the 'Oxford Research Group' which Frank Barnaby, a supposed expert, run or ran; plus various associates listed on their website - john sloboda, paul rogers, hamit dardagan, chris abbott, fiona harrison, andy roberts, thomas phipps, rosie holdsworth. Barnaby was foolish enough to reply once, obviously a poltical mistake. None of the others have replied....
rerevisionist 2 years ago
A comparison is shown here between a normal cannon and a new atomic cannon. Both are shot from different angles. The atomic cannon is a tighter shot with far more smoke emitting from the firing. We also don't know the frame rate of each film so just because no bullet is seen existing the muzzle doesn't mean it wasn't there. More pseudoscience drawing false conclusions.
vuturistic 2 years ago
Yes vuturistic, the footage of this explosion dates back to 1953.
In 1953 the speed at which the camera was filming would not have been consistent with the speed at which the projectile was firing (2060ft per second).
The 15 kiloton nuclear device shown here, detonated over 10,000 meters from the cannon.
ccmm53095 2 years ago
If I shoot a stupid idiot with a gun, but he doesn't see the bullet coming, will he still die?
geonerd 2 years ago
Bullets dont exist either... i shot a gun once and didnt see the bullet, therefore bullets dont exist.
Tekner436 2 years ago
NUKEs really do exist and I think people denying NUKEs exist deny them because it seems too horrible yet the HORROR is REAL...
NUKEs reallly do exist......
mike4ty4 2 years ago
You expect to see a bullet in regular speed with a cannon that probally fires that thing at 500+ mph? At near supersonic speeds? You must be high.
Stormwind187 2 years ago 2
@Stormwind187
"500+ mph"
More like 1500mph. Well over Mach 2. No way it could be seen on a film that jerky.
voiceoftruth2006 1 year ago
"Why ???"
Because you must have a high frame rate in order to capture such a thing on film. Idiot.
MrPoopybum 2 years ago
i guess this video doesnt exist either and you and i dont exist and nothing exist.
brianmenendez 2 years ago
And the ignorant shall inherit the Earth. :(
geonerd 2 years ago
That cannon is sitting down the road from here at the War Museum in Hampton, Virginia. Serial No. 1 of 1. You can ride it if you want. ....Actually, there's a sign specifically telling you not to, but if I did everything a sign told me to do, I'd never have gotten to meet Lucy Liu. Psh, private residence no trespassing my ass.
P.S. When's the last time you've seen a bullet when it was fired (ultra slow-mo cameras don't count)?
danieldeibler 2 years ago 2
my god, how could you be able you see flying bullet????
you need to have ULTRA HIGHT SPEED camera to see this!!!
Just take a look at "time warp" clips for example...
In *your* clip you've provided only few *frames of shooting* - and you suppose one of them should show the bullet???
pkasperskyi 2 years ago
stupid post. this canon really exists.
USSR also developed such kind of weapons.
pkasperskyi 2 years ago
Here's a fun experiment, take a firearm, record the shot on a camera, try to slow down the film and see the bullet fired. You can't because the bullet is moving at such a high velocity that it has left the field of vision between frames. Bullets are fast kid.
skwurl123456789 2 years ago
Wow, so I am guessing you can see a bullet fly out of a gun when its shot. Hmm you cant? Try slow motion, oh there it is, but you only see it for 1 or 2 frames.
Too bad back when they fired this cannon they didnt have the tech we have today to film this with super clear high speed camera.
Cant believe this is spouted as evidence.
miyonheart 2 years ago
wow u have no idea about the velocities of projectiles do you?
should find something better to do with ur life, like standing at the other end of a cannon :)
hypock1 2 years ago 6
what was the fps of the original film? if you can't answer that, then this video is worthless.
therealkidfrombrookl 2 years ago 4
Yeah tell that to the millions of people in Japan that died.
RioUchiha 2 years ago 3
owned. lol
hypock1 2 years ago 2
Your not the smartest cookie ay. Think about it... the smoke and fire take 1 second to clear the picture, with a projectile travelling the speed of sound your not gonna see it. esspecially on this old footage when cameras weren't so accurate.
nitschke22 2 years ago 3
come on, seriously. if you put footage of a handgun being fired on 'super slow motion' would you expect to see the bullitt? why do you expect it here? and if we are testing these bombs in the context of a cold war, why wouldn't we give disinfo to our enemies by making them believe we can shoot it as artillery?
i don't think we landed on the moon, i know 9/11 was a fraud, but this does not constitute any sort of evidence. you're grasping at straws
shrikesim 2 years ago
who gives a shit. we all know that during the cold war both sides were tryiing to look superior no reason to make an argument about it...
DFTOdrummer 2 years ago
It makes sense now. Nature would work that way with all that energy - or else we'd be toast along time ago. Right? I geuss that these neg. commenters do'nt know their own nature well enough to identify with nature/reality. The kind that look at '9/11' & the 'physics' sits perfectly well with them! HAHA! Zombies......
What do these motherfuckers think Kubrick's 'Dr.Strangelove' was about. I'll tell you. 'THEM' (like the commenters) the ignorant souless fuck-tard on the planet in a satire!
Wolviepayne 2 years ago
Your wierd wolvie
nitschke22 2 years ago
Appreciate it! ;)
If you have'nt seen 'Dr.Strangelove' you seem intelligent enough to see what it's going for....
Is it 'Love' that's 'Strange'
(The 'Strange Attractor')
or "WIERD" (as you phrased it)?
NOTE (ABOUT FILM): Undergound Bunkers
Are Real...........
Wolviepayne 2 years ago
There are nuclear bombs, but they don't work like we think they work.A nuke must be ground based, not airborn, and can only detonate 2 times a year.This is because it uses a harmonic relationship between the Earth's core, the sun and the device. The sun is only in position twice a year in any given spot on Earth. It's a worldwide freemasonic conspiracy to keep popluations in fear and to allow standing armies to exist. Supposedly the Jesuits have a device planted in every major city in the world.
FastBrian1 2 years ago 2
Retard, a nuclear bomb is caused by uranium or plutonium reaching its criticak mass therefore causing an explosion... you idiot, there has been many many more than two nuclear explosions in 1 year.
The retards you meet on the internet... am i wrong guys?
nitschke22 2 years ago 4
You misread my comment, I said "The sun is only in position twice a year in any given spot on Earth." That means a nuclear device can be detonated in a specific place twice a year, therefore theoretically there could a constant detonation of nuclear devices as long as they are placed and detonated precisely with the movement of the sun. So there can be an infanite number of nuclear explosions on or in Earth in a one year span, not just two.
FastBrian1 2 years ago
Actually theirs a guy that said not 1
But 2 is the ceiling limit time-window.
Not attempting validation - maybe this guy did'nt hear what the other guys were saying
is all. Albeit this is no isolated incident.........
Wolviepayne 2 years ago
@nitschke22 you know nothing about this so you should grabs some books. obviously you know nothing of harmonic 33 in which i would advise you to read
matsutakneatche 1 year ago
WTF is this shit?
Go to Google Earth and look at Nevada, near Groom Lake. There are fields of craters from nuclear explosions...
Is this a joke?
LordBLB 2 years ago 2
It's fine for you to not like the US military, and it's even fine for you to blame them for things, however a video from ebaumsworld is hardly proof of anything other than the fact that you are too fanatically convinced of your conclusion to even consider the possibility of being wrong.
Tavereen 2 years ago 4
@Tavereen and that he's a dumbass
Raptor2100X 1 year ago
ahaahah your a moron poster!!!!!
robdmhaze 2 years ago
well since i have a grandfather that was there i would and has talked about it to me i would say it happened but keep your blinders on lol
robdmhaze 2 years ago
Let's consider this shit while Obama declares martial law. Perhaps the chinese are mad at americans because they were sworn to secrecy? I'll be doing extensive research.
jeffbme 2 years ago
I really cannot be arsed to read all the previous comments.
All I have to say is that you are a fucking retard.
YEAH THE ATOMIC BOMB DOESNT EXIST!111
Sure, thats why 2 Japanese cities are radioactive wastelands right now.
Marcotheskunk 2 years ago
You can plainly see the reflection of the flash on the gun barrel...........You people who believe in a fake nuclear world can do without your toaster with its nuclear powered electrical grid system....Oh thats right, you think your toaster is powered by little tiny magical fairies.
RichardEllisxyz 2 years ago
I just saw a bomb (pause at 1:00 ) it was blurred (can't spell lol) but I saw it. FAIL
kochkochkoch 3 years ago
You really can't see it man?
You're just pretending to not see such an obvious atomic bullet. Next thing youll be telling me you didnt see it land either. You know what. I smell a loose rass cannon.
FilliD1 3 years ago
not real? tell that to all the families that lost loved ones in Hiroshima.
alex95187 3 years ago
Have you ever heard of a thing called 'frames per second'? its how many frames a camera can capture in a second, some artillery shells can exceed 1600 m/s, now you try and film something travelling at 1600 m/s with a camera that only films at like 15 f.p.s That would be like trying to capture a bullet on a phone camera.
cantbeaskedlol 3 years ago
this VIDEO DOES NOT EXISTS
ElyanSun 3 years ago
this VIDEO MUST NOT EXISTS...
ElyanSun 3 years ago
no offence but ur one of those people who is out of touch with the world. We used and atomic bomb on hiroshima and it was REAL.
streetgoboom 3 years ago 2
god doesn't excist!
up yours.........dummy
GhettoPierre 3 years ago
can you see through the smoke cloud. Those cameras didnt have super slo-mo they couldnt slow down that much. I can't see through a cloud of smoke and fire.
delenith 3 years ago
You can 'slow it down further still' but you can't add frames to the original video. The original video didn't have the frame rate to be sure to catch the projectile. No big mystery. Not saying whether the video is real or not, just saying that your argument is stupid.
Bozeman42 3 years ago
According to your logic in the video, the smoke didn't come out of the cannon either. It OBVIOUSLY just appeared in a large ball around the cannon. Or was placed there in post. You never actually saw the smoke 'come out' of the cannon. FAIL
Bozeman42 3 years ago 3
In 1953 when this particular test was conducted the speed of the cameras that where used to film the test could not keep up with the speed at which the projectile was fired, the photographic technology was nothing in comparison to today's standereds.
crockigater2 3 years ago 2
Ask anyone who works with ballistics. By the time you see the smoke, the projectile has already left the barrel. These were fired with the same kind of explosive used on naval ships and not the lower power stuff used by field artillery. The reason is *distance*. Now, having been *at* a test, any nitwit who says atomic bombs do not exist is too young by far and far too gullible.
RyuDarragh 3 years ago
I would suggest you take a peek at the book, "The Secret War". Apparently the nuclear pioneers found the whole prospect of a nuclear bomb just a tad ludicrous. So, who invented it?
AtticusStount 3 years ago
Don't "quote mine" like the creationist crowd does. Sir. Teller said the "notion of the atomic bomb as a weapon of war is ludicrous", not that the existance of the bomb was ludicrous.
RyuDarragh 3 years ago
this niggih dont think shit stinks!
teodoro1980 3 years ago
It's really laughable how you are trying to find the "proofs" of what you say...
The "old" cannon is obviously more powerfull than the one you took for the "proof" (look at the size), and even with this one, the bullet appears (luckily) on only one frame...
So with a little logic and intelligence you could see, even with your poor ones, that this doesn't prove anything...
Aw excuse me that's true, logic and intelligence are obviously also a conspiracy...
gui174 3 years ago
The atomic cannon obviously moves back the second the Grable projectile is fired numbnuts.
crockigater 3 years ago
Good point, but I suspect the concept of 'recoil' is a bit beyond our friend's grasp.
geonerd 2 years ago
Just because a video made a long time ago was edited doesnt mean that the atom bomb isnt real.
88saab900 3 years ago
Kaiten0202 yes Tokyo was almost totaly destroyed by normal bombs, but, that has nothing to do with the atomic bomb because Tokyo was never bombed by an atomic bomb, idiot.
avesataniavesatani 4 years ago
You do realize that it would shoot out of that cannon way to fast to be seen, you would have needed to record it with a high fps camera and THEN play it in slow motion. DIPSHIT. Of course something fucking came out of it because of the spark and the fact that the cannon moves back. Stupid ass.
HoboClownTracks 4 years ago 3
Cannon technology was better 50 years ago than today? They shot faster? And the spark and the recoil point to the charge in the round, not whether the round was empty or not. Blanks in a gun still kick and fire. I don't know whether or not atomic bombs exist, but your reasons for believing something had to come out of that cannon don't hold water.
ljbjork 3 years ago
Then why the fuck is there a trail of smoke in the air?
Nice point though.
HoboClownTracks 3 years ago
Ohh, you dum kid. You should read the world history. Shame on you! Maybe some videos, which are given by government, are false, but we all know that there was Chirosima and thousands of dead. Find the historical videos about Chirosima, you will see how it looks, and then tell us, that atomic bombs does NOT EXIST. Lol
Kapsulina 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The dumbest video ever
OhMyScience1 4 years ago 7
are you dumb shit
talk the effect of a camera's frame per second
the bullet was luckily caught in the "real" bullet vid
but the camera didnt catch it on the "fake" vid cause the frame per second wasnt high
kazenokizumi 4 years ago
there are no nuclear bombs--the government simply employs chuck norris and has to do a cover up. Wouldnt you lie about a bomb if it kept you out of chuck norris's way?
johnnytothemc 4 years ago 5
lol
fcs10 4 years ago
tokyo was already being bombed by normal bombs from before the development of the bomb, so the city was already half gone.
I think you gotta read some books, instead of watching stupid videos everyday on youtube lol
kaiten0202 4 years ago 3
Uh... Tokyo was not an atomic bomb site. It was bombed by normal bombs but not by atomic bombs
wiiwouldliketoplaymi 3 years ago
good job! next time put a little more effort in reading people's comments properly
kaiten0202 3 years ago
Haha, Son Goku... Das is gut, wirklich.
destybenway 4 years ago 2
nah it was probably son goku fighting there...
just fucking idiots that belive the bullshit in
this video. Of coures nukes exist 2 whole citys destroyed by dimanite...
Mafiaaffe 4 years ago
well.its a different kind of cannon u nub.!.the first one is a umm wat u call this....i forget the 2nd one is an artillery.go get a life.or go ask the army to make it easier.
kainmuna 4 years ago
if the atomic cannon isn't shooting anything, how do they get it to recoil like that?
stroock6394 4 years ago
Do us all a favor and stop downloading videos of ebaums world and get a life.
Yetagainmonkeyman 4 years ago
heres the flaw. maybe the first cannon's rocket was too fast for the video to capture. and the second cannon, is a totally different cannon model then the first one so it doesnt justify much. the camera in the second one may be better and the rocket itself may be slower.
ashaiba91 4 years ago 2
pause at 3:05 u can clearly see it.
toxicshot 4 years ago
you obviously did read the message that came before 3:05...
raypretty 4 years ago
Is that all you got? Same thing over and over, every time. I suppose the earthquakes that occur outside this timeframe are fake....
zaphod3099 4 years ago
putz cara vc viaja mesmo
danielddr1 4 years ago
The shell from that gun was travelling at around 2000km/h. That camera takes 52 shots a second. In around 1/52nd of a second the shell would have travelled around 540 meters. The diameter of that shell was around 15 inches, a bit bigger than a football. Can you see a football from half a kilometer away? I'd be surprised since you CANT EVEN SEE THE FACTS!
denten007 4 years ago 5
if a-bombs don't exist, what the hell happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
loperspest 4 years ago 4
once again you astound me with your apparant lack of attention. i would like to point out that your theory once a gaping hole in . the film was not taken with hi speed photography in mind. so it is not suprising that you do not see a projectile.
ChemicalMikeUK 4 years ago
well i have watched the whole series of the videos supporting that argument..
i must admit that in some point some videos were FAKE..
however this does not necessarily implies that atomic bombs do no exist..
there was a time during cold war where these fake vids might have been released for political reasons.. but atomic chain reaction is a reality and atomic bombs do exist..
newschatter 4 years ago 9
I would agree with your statments. It is possible they faked certain aspects of shots or made things appear bigger and badder then they really were just to put more fear into the Russians or any other country for that matter. These are very real and nasty weapons that I wish never were invented.
scafone12 4 years ago
but why they fake the movies if atomic bomb exist? It isn`t an evidence of a fraud? Only political reasons? And the man on the moon they did the same ? If u have more fake videos please send the adreess iam very interted in this tems. Thank you.
nicname2008 4 years ago
@newschatter I have the same feeling about a line being crossed. In the movie "trinity and beyond" which I feel is a flat out modern day Military funded film (with William Shatner as host) The "inventor" of the Hydrogen Bomb states they needed to understand basically what they had done, and this was 1951, it was still possibly all a big mis-hap, too dangerous to continue, so hence forth came the propaganda counter films of the Hydrogen era.? Is this plausable?
freqazoidiac 1 year ago
What a dork.... common cammeras just cannot register a moving shell, not even a pistol bullet.
Or perhaps bullets don't exist either.
JulianCallens 4 years ago 5
I visted ICBM missle silos while in the air force. I can assure you sir they are very real and functional weapons. Ever hear of a mirv bus? They really do exist and are capable of killing millions. Why would they build hundreds of working rockets to carry a weapon that doesn't work? The missles themselves wouldn't function.What would be the point?
scafone12 4 years ago
Hahahhaha
Dude. I can say- good imagination. Maybe the video about atomic bombs are fake, but the bombs do exist. How do u explain Hiroshima and Nagasaki? And radiation consequences? Though, nice idea.
serbprideworldwide77 4 years ago
to serbprideworldwide77 - why they did it on Hiroshima and Nagasaki instead of Tokio? To have radiations diseases you dont need an Atomic Bomb Cesio is enougth
cybercheguevara 4 years ago 2
Why bomb Tokyo? Bomb secondary cities and give them time to think about a surrender? The reasons are countless. This is one of your reasons for not your theory? Your mental.
scafone12 4 years ago
Get a Life ;)
Boeloet 4 years ago 3
People who are so unhappy with their own lives often belive things like this or even partake in making them up. They have to blame the unfair evil world for why things are not going their way. The motive for this is beyond me except you are just mental.
scafone12 4 years ago
So all the ICMB silos I visited while in the Air Force were put there to keep this grand illusion? If this were remotely true, third world nation's such as Iran would expose it to show how weak the US really is.Who's to say your not the one doctoring these films? Get a life.
scafone12 4 years ago
Take a gun
Shoot yourself in the face
YOU DON'T EVEN SEE THE BULLET!
Guns are OBVIOUSLY fake.
charlesviper 4 years ago 5
I don't pretend to know everything there is to know about Nuclear science, however I know more than the average. I for one don't feel that there is any evidance these videos are fraudulent in way. As I was watching your video I realized that as it begins to play in slow motion it seemed, at certain parts, there were frames missing as though someone manually edited the film or even digitally removed certain frames. It seems someone either the author or "Moonshow" edited this video as I said.
dragonshade1988 4 years ago
Upshot-Knothole, Shot Grable was conducted during 1953, barely 5 years after the introduction of the colour camera. Upon firing, the 11in M9 projectile adopted a velocity of 526 meters per second. That's over 1800km/h. With the frame rate of the old camera, there is no possible way it would have been able to pick up the projectile leaving the weapon. The reason why this test created a precursor was because of the trajectory and sheer velocity before detonation. Explain that you moron.
flyboy172r 4 years ago
los americanos de mierda siguen mentindo para el pueblo...
cybercheguevara 4 years ago 3
One more proof of the fake-atomic bomb! Wake up people! Its time to change this world!
artemidiasul 4 years ago 3
very good! One more fakemovie about the "Bombgate"! The lie of the century!
nicname2008 4 years ago 4