Crash Course in Presuppositional Apologetics: Transcendental Argument

[COEXISTential]

Presuppositional apologetics doesn't allow for any kind of debate. If all arguments rely on the "knowledge" of god's existence then all reasoning will have that as its root and no logical opposition can occur as there is no common ground to argue to.

Circular reasoning is no reasoning at all.

In formal debate you can't base all of your arguments on a premise that is not agreed by both parties or you poison the well.

As for logical consequences... from the Bible? Surely you jest?

[serapix12]

don't answer a fool in his folly

[serapix12]

all these negative comments i keep seein on this guy and what he says shows me that he's right. his science is correct, his math correct... so why are you neg commentators so scared. you can't say he's wrong and whatever ridiculous evolutionary model u believe in does it's best just to be considered make believe, cant be proven at all. keep it up john, they see that the canopy of lies theyv lived under so long is crashing down around them so they cant prove u wrong so they just badmouth.

[serapix12]

john has a good range in his wisdom.. excellent stuff. i think he's right on especially with his cosmology and physics of the age of the universe.... ive seen so many pro comments but there are some that??????????????? im a physacist as well and no matter how you try, u can't say he is wrong in his science because he just isn't.