Stock card vs stock bikes and the bike would win majority of the time on nay given race. If you take out all the other equations then why even race? Accept the results for what they are and not, "take this out!, add this up!, better riding positions!, heavier weights!, COME ON! I owned a Vett and bikes and I am happier riding than driving but passing other cars that won't let you merge in a Vett is about just as much fun but cruising on Vett is tiring compare to riding. Just my opinion!
The older yamaha was when the sportbike companies were getting into all the technology the older bikes are "ancient" compared to the new bikes i'm not saying anything is wrong with older bikes because i love this model yamaha but the new ones would prob beat that car stock Just please don't put a lot of bad replies to this
all newer model japanese manufactured bikes are gearing or VSS(vehicle speed sensor limited to 300kmh(186mph) for all those that didnt know. An most if all liter sportbikes if un governed would be fast enought to eclipse the 200mph wall that most auto makers make you spend ridicuolous amounts of money to break..... the vette is not faster then the bike... the bike is simply limited.
you people are forgetting that it was a completely stock r1 against a vette designed for racing. with no extra performance parts the r1 kept its pace with the vette and when the hayabusa went up against it there was no contest. everyone who thinks a vette is faster this is true when its a racing car vs a regular street bike. lets see a bone stock vette go up against the r1 and then see which one wins
Inexpericed R-1 rider and very inexperienced Busa rider with camera are shitting on Good brand name bikes. More practice needed before you start racing again. It is not fair for you bike's brand name.
Lets apply them to the bike first. With a little research I have found the Busa' A.C. to be around .56. Imputing the second factor in it all we notice that 170 sum odd horsepower isn't much to aid acceleration in the ever increasing drag on the bike.
On the car we find the A.C. to be closer to .30, what does that mean. To put it simply the lower the A.C. to more efficiently it moves through a fluid(air). Dully noting the 600+ hp output of the car, witch easly muscles to over come drag.
I dont understand why you guys cant give props for the vette that weights 6 times the weight of the bike. Here is the comparison I come up with to show you how good the vette is. Lets say the R1 weight about 450lb the vette weights est. 3300lbs the corvette here makes 690rwhp ok so if you divide the hp it makes by 6 because it weights 6 times what the bike weights. the vette is using about 115hp per every 500lbs of weight which is a lot less than what the bike has in hp.Props to thevette.
@alex369 your rational would be better off using torque numbers, but also remember that not only are you fighting the mass of the vehicle you are fighting increasing resistance, so as you go faster the mass holding you back becomes less important than the air resistance. the car does not have 6x more aerodynamic drag, which is why bikes lose for top speed runs and high speed acceleration vs huge hp cars
@alex369 Bikes are light and probably have the same aerodynamics as a car, but once a rider sits on the bike, most of those aerodynamics go out the window, since the drive will create a lot of drag, unless he/she has their chest on the fuel tank, and fully tucked in... whereas the only negative for a car when the driver sits in it is the drivers weight nothing else... still cars will never beat bikes in acceleration (stock V stock) but will most likely beat them in a top speed race.
If the bikes wasn't castrated from the factory then the fastest cars couldn't catch them not even in their wildest dreams. Look at the nature the small animals are the fastest. Now look at our new world order : Less defence to the weak and more power to the strong. The only defence of the bike on the road is acceleration and nowadays this is canceled from the fast cars. Thing this The sick driver of the car makes dificult the life of the biker because he can't ride a bike for any reasson.
Sorry but horsepower always wins out. Cars will always have better top end and corner faster. The bikes accelerate quickly but they will eventually be ran down. Just reality buddy
LOL! go learn some more before you make such an ignorant comment. chances are you only pay attention to cars or else you wouldn't have said something so stupid.
Bikes hit a wall at about 150mph. Cars have a ton more contact patch and there for can leave you in the twisties. There is no way you can refute this unless you yourself are ignorant or are in denial. Either way your post was a waste of space like 90% of them are.
theres been plenty of bikes 200mph+ tho average for a fast bike is somewhere around 180. and stock you're mostly right for a bike that costs 8k or less about the 150mph max. like i said, research says a lot more than just thinking you know what you're talking about.
And still your point is mute. You give no evidence or any such material to back up your claim, Pretty sure I know why. To give you the benifit of doubt I'll just blame it on ignorance. Bikes CAN NOT compete against cars on top end or road holding abilities. Yes compared to especialy your daily driver they probably fell like the ultimate speed machine. And please don't come at me with this stupid research bs. I can garantee you have little to no experience with 2 wheels or 4.
I'd say they're about evenly matched up to about 170mph-190mph, then the Veyron would start pulling away. But don't forget I can go pick up a Busa tomorrow for £5,000, where as the Veyron is about £500,000
Dude, that busa woulda ripped all the bikes there.. if I rode it. ONE TURBO OR NOT.. and r1 maxes at at 190mph = 265khm or whatever and from jump street all the ikes made it to the line before the vette did, or group of people on all the vids, so in a qrt mile that vette aint shit.... tbh, sounds nice, but i've seen mustanges that would rip that!
I ve seen tones of videos that are about car vs bike street racing.The race starts from 40 mph or more.My question is...Why dont they start,just once, from 0 mph?
Just look it up I have a vid of this same vette racing a Busa on the 1/4 mile and been neck and neck. I also have a vid of an older c4 gen vette racing a 750 off the hole.
I'm not sure I'd call passing the R1 at damn near its top speed a "win", seeing as how the bike was ahead the whole time before that lol, but still nice vid thanks for posting! Hmm ok that's a weird contradiction because you said the 10R was the winner...even though the vette would have passed it pretty soon at like 180.
the b2k callaway vette had the record before of 254.76 mph with around 800hp and 582trq if I am correct for fastest production car legally sold for the streets and we are talking in 1988 for does of you that did'nt know :) Its pretty interesting. It's has twin turbo and boosts a total of 52pounds.
The r1 is the best any day because on a track with corners that go right and also some that go to the left ( a concept you americans have problems understanding ) it would smoke the lot of them.
Bike has no weight to it so ofcourse it'll outrun cars. But it's still just a bike. Most people prefer cars to bikes. Slightly more comfort and protection there.
I beat a Triumph 955i ,which isnt the fastest bike around.But my supercharged mustang beat him rather easily ,to my surprise...It doesnt happen to often but sometimes cars win...You need a boat load of money to blow...
new busa - £8,500. New Corvette - £55,000. Mods to make Corvette nearly as powerful as an R1 - £15,000? And if the guy on the R1 could actually ride then the Vette would still lose. It's a tried and tested fact that the only car to beat a bike on those sort of runs is the Bugatti Veyron, if anything else seems to win a race with a bike it's down to the fact the rider is shit. Yeah, your GSXR would take that Vette, so would a zx6r if it was ridden properly!
Nearly as powerful?A vette is more powerful than almost ANY bike it's the power to weight,give a bike all the hp & tq that the vette has and see how fast you die,hell most bikes have what an average of 120hp where-as a stock z06 has 505.The Bugatti was put to shame by the fastest street legal vette by LPE which was a twin turbo z06 making 1000+hp,the bugatti is slow it took what 5 miles to get to 230+.the LPE vette made it to just 225+ in a standing mile with only two turbos
Actualy the Bugatti is the fastest stock car to both 150 and 220 mph, so it wasn't put to shame, but I catch your drift, The Bugatti is heavy because it's a luxury car, so a sports car with the same hp will beat it.
Fastest stock car at what price? As much as that thing costs you could build something much faster. And i'm glad you catch my drift...most people are too busy humping their favorite car to pay attention to both sides
Lol true. Thing about the Veyron, it's a luxury car, so it weighs over 4100 pounds. It takes its advantage from the massive torque it produces that literally pushes the car to 250 mph, but its not as good of a track performer as other cars in its price range (a high price range lol).
should have capitalized "high" lol, but yea its not bad...but i was taken back when i saw the video of the LPE vette going to 0-226 in a mile...i thought that was just disgusting
Distugtingly fast lol. Yeah, that's a pretty fast car. I wonder what the Veyron could do if you took of all the unneccesary weight and modded up the engine...
I think most of the weight actually comes from whats needed on that car...i know the motor itself is heavy as hell and all the turbo's intercoolers are bound to be heavy also..
Lol true... the Bugatti probably has a lot of potential though. They used a 16 liter engine with 4 turbos to create a lot of reliable horsepower. I wonder what you could to if you unleashed its full potential... too bad they're much too nice and expensive to be doing any work on the car.
try looking at how fast u go on a bike for what you spend... the r1 costs about 20 grand (nz) brand new when the corvette would cost a hundred grand for a cheap 1,90 % of bikes get past at 150 ae? do these cars your talking about cost a million bucks or what? or were u talkn about the bikes that were made not to be fast? the fast ones top out at 300+ and the turbo ones between 350 and 400 kph. those turbo bikes are about 50 grand. it would cost several million to get a car capeable of that
so what? I could show up in a car built for the salt flats that can do 250mph and beat the vette with a flyby, even if it does 0-60 in 10 seconds. What's the point of racing top speed? There's a reason people run 1/4 mile and not 5 mile.
im just curious how you know that your bike could take that vette? i own a gixxer also and i would love to take a vette but i wouldnt know that until i raced it! just curious..
yea it is a gixxer 600 the vette was stock, and it was super close! it would of got me if we hadnt slowed down at 120!! so i would say a 1000 could take it! depends on the vetts mods!! some of those zo6s rip hard..just like the gixxer..
Not sure if you've ever driven a 1000 or not but the difference between the pull of a 600 and 1000 is day and night. I owned an R6 a couple of years ago before getting my gixxer 1000 and my R6 isn't even close. 1000's are animals.
iv ridden an 2005 r1 but didnt really open it up..I would like to test all the liter bikes, but i love my gixxer maybe soon a 1000..even with the the 600 the r1 only beats me in the quater in a second..it rips me after that...safe riding...
you all are fuckin retards. you act like a vette or any other car for that matter is in the same league as a bike. that bike probably weighs as much as the wheeles and tires on that vette. and on another topic... that vette prolly does have 600 something h/p because its probably supercharched. d
if thats what you think then your hella stupid, do die. how much does a bike weigh? 800 pounds how much does a fucking corvette weigh? 3200 pounds you retard, thats 4 times as much, even if it had 4 times the horsepower and tq it still wouldnt matter, a 100 pound difference between cars is more dramatic than 100 pounds for a person. so you can only imagine how badly the corvette would lose. oh, no wait you cant. because your a stupid ignorant fuck.
2002 R1 less than $10K Vette $45 and that is not 600+ H.P. so add another $15-20K and lets try a 2007 R1 with 180 HP stock and the R1 is one bad ass litre bike you are talking fractions of a milla second less then a GSXR, but IMHO alot more reliable. the busa is a top speed bike not a road racer like the R1 or Gsxr. I have an 03 limited R1 for 4 years it is one bad ass bike i would like to have seen the run from a standing stop the vette would not have had a chance to catch up.
so if thats a fact how come my gixxer beat a zo6! let me guess the driver in the car didnt know how to race..they should give passes to the retards who post stupid comments on the internet!
Did i say wich Z06??? Maybe i ment the fab. team car. It would easily have owned your bike... BTW, cars have slower acceleration, Because theyr weight is several times the bike, so in drags most cars gets owned by bikes. But put your bike up against the Z06 team car in Le Mans and see what happends...
zx-10 is a more powerful bike, put the same rider on both bikes, and the ZX-10 would win a race like this.
The R1 is actually one of the lesser powered litre bikes, along with the fireblade (if lesser exists!) The GSXR-1000 and the ZX-10 are more or less on par.
Stock card vs stock bikes and the bike would win majority of the time on nay given race. If you take out all the other equations then why even race? Accept the results for what they are and not, "take this out!, add this up!, better riding positions!, heavier weights!, COME ON! I owned a Vett and bikes and I am happier riding than driving but passing other cars that won't let you merge in a Vett is about just as much fun but cruising on Vett is tiring compare to riding. Just my opinion!
oogiemaster 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
The older yamaha was when the sportbike companies were getting into all the technology the older bikes are "ancient" compared to the new bikes i'm not saying anything is wrong with older bikes because i love this model yamaha but the new ones would prob beat that car stock Just please don't put a lot of bad replies to this
Lcguy87 10 months ago
geeeiillll
Motorider2008 1 year ago
all newer model japanese manufactured bikes are gearing or VSS(vehicle speed sensor limited to 300kmh(186mph) for all those that didnt know. An most if all liter sportbikes if un governed would be fast enought to eclipse the 200mph wall that most auto makers make you spend ridicuolous amounts of money to break..... the vette is not faster then the bike... the bike is simply limited.
onefastsuby 1 year ago
admire the vette but omg busas are just beast
yoyi2030 1 year ago
Vette on steroids bets a stock bike.
Dragging a 250cc scooter with my 4door Accord will be as pointless as this one :)
theD00Mer 1 year ago
Fuck Vettes
KwaGmoney 1 year ago
typical americans, who's fastest in a strait line, learn to corner
colicabcadam 1 year ago
Man, that vette's fuckin fast!
robsta289 1 year ago
10r no joke.......
Cheoz0r 1 year ago
you people are forgetting that it was a completely stock r1 against a vette designed for racing. with no extra performance parts the r1 kept its pace with the vette and when the hayabusa went up against it there was no contest. everyone who thinks a vette is faster this is true when its a racing car vs a regular street bike. lets see a bone stock vette go up against the r1 and then see which one wins
xAlcatraz3592x 1 year ago
Fuck the vette haters, bunch of bitches
JimmyRaygoza 2 years ago
Fuck the vette haters, u fags r a bunch of bitches
JimmyRaygoza 2 years ago
Inexpericed R-1 rider and very inexperienced Busa rider with camera are shitting on Good brand name bikes. More practice needed before you start racing again. It is not fair for you bike's brand name.
jujutube123 2 years ago
@jujutube123 You're full of crap, the Vette is bad ass and it's that simple.
KoolWire 2 years ago
why do you take your hand of the gas?
blazej1 2 years ago
Thats a real nice vette, that exhaust sounds fuckin amazing.
I'm a bike person tho, and thats gotta be a nice whip to keep up with a busa with nos.
chunnkygoat 2 years ago
In conclusion we can find that with the car having a better A.C. and gobs more hp it's a no-brainier it won.
Notes:This only implies to this specific situation I.e. type race. I used a stock Suzuki Hayabusa as I don't know the number for the bikes depicted.
bigguns16 2 years ago
Lets apply them to the bike first. With a little research I have found the Busa' A.C. to be around .56. Imputing the second factor in it all we notice that 170 sum odd horsepower isn't much to aid acceleration in the ever increasing drag on the bike.
On the car we find the A.C. to be closer to .30, what does that mean. To put it simply the lower the A.C. to more efficiently it moves through a fluid(air). Dully noting the 600+ hp output of the car, witch easly muscles to over come drag.
bigguns16 2 years ago
Time for a lesson in logic children:
They're 2 determining deciding factors in a stright-line top-end run.
(1)Aerodynamics=Aerodynamic coefficient= i.e. how efficiently a certain mass moves through a fluid (in this case air)
(2)Power=horsepower=torque(for the sake of simplicity we be using horsepower, torque is another lesson
So now that we know the 2 factors we can apply them to the situation and better understand it.... continue on next post.
bigguns16 2 years ago
shut up retard and put on a shirt tuff guy..lol, i bet u get all the ladies dont ya...
ouriess 2 years ago
after 150... car areodynamic's pawn bikes. Not surprising he could catch up in the end. Cool race
Looked like from about 1:14 -> 1:39 you guys dragged a mile +/- 5%
lifeisgood070 2 years ago
I dont understand why you guys cant give props for the vette that weights 6 times the weight of the bike. Here is the comparison I come up with to show you how good the vette is. Lets say the R1 weight about 450lb the vette weights est. 3300lbs the corvette here makes 690rwhp ok so if you divide the hp it makes by 6 because it weights 6 times what the bike weights. the vette is using about 115hp per every 500lbs of weight which is a lot less than what the bike has in hp.Props to thevette.
alex369 2 years ago
i think both of them are the shit im gettin a bike not a car but if i did get a car it would be the vette
zlee415 2 years ago
@alex369 lol that 10r kicked vette ass...... id been on boths r1 and zx10r and the zx10r its faster than r1
Cheoz0r 1 year ago
@alex369 your rational would be better off using torque numbers, but also remember that not only are you fighting the mass of the vehicle you are fighting increasing resistance, so as you go faster the mass holding you back becomes less important than the air resistance. the car does not have 6x more aerodynamic drag, which is why bikes lose for top speed runs and high speed acceleration vs huge hp cars
jrowe6 1 year ago
@alex369 Bikes are light and probably have the same aerodynamics as a car, but once a rider sits on the bike, most of those aerodynamics go out the window, since the drive will create a lot of drag, unless he/she has their chest on the fuel tank, and fully tucked in... whereas the only negative for a car when the driver sits in it is the drivers weight nothing else... still cars will never beat bikes in acceleration (stock V stock) but will most likely beat them in a top speed race.
champion1642 10 months ago
hahaha OMG I love these race car facts comin from a kid that probly drives a tempo LMFAO I will take on ANY CAR, ANY TIME in the curvies with my R1
needmorebeer64 2 years ago
Nowadays car drivers can play with the safety of the bikers because they can. And if the biker loose his temper then bad news
Kostadds 2 years ago
If the bikes wasn't castrated from the factory then the fastest cars couldn't catch them not even in their wildest dreams. Look at the nature the small animals are the fastest. Now look at our new world order : Less defence to the weak and more power to the strong. The only defence of the bike on the road is acceleration and nowadays this is canceled from the fast cars. Thing this The sick driver of the car makes dificult the life of the biker because he can't ride a bike for any reasson.
Kostadds 2 years ago
Sorry but horsepower always wins out. Cars will always have better top end and corner faster. The bikes accelerate quickly but they will eventually be ran down. Just reality buddy
prosoccer2115 2 years ago
LOL! go learn some more before you make such an ignorant comment. chances are you only pay attention to cars or else you wouldn't have said something so stupid.
2random2control 2 years ago
And what is so stupid?? Please enlighten me
Bikes hit a wall at about 150mph. Cars have a ton more contact patch and there for can leave you in the twisties. There is no way you can refute this unless you yourself are ignorant or are in denial. Either way your post was a waste of space like 90% of them are.
prosoccer2115 2 years ago
theres been plenty of bikes 200mph+ tho average for a fast bike is somewhere around 180. and stock you're mostly right for a bike that costs 8k or less about the 150mph max. like i said, research says a lot more than just thinking you know what you're talking about.
2random2control 2 years ago
2random2control,
Yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah. Heard this several times before. You know everything, I know nothing.
What sportbike cost less than 8k these days? Some what late model 600's can hit 160. 1000's around 180-190
Continued...
prosoccer2115 2 years ago
Continued....
And still your point is mute. You give no evidence or any such material to back up your claim, Pretty sure I know why. To give you the benifit of doubt I'll just blame it on ignorance. Bikes CAN NOT compete against cars on top end or road holding abilities. Yes compared to especialy your daily driver they probably fell like the ultimate speed machine. And please don't come at me with this stupid research bs. I can garantee you have little to no experience with 2 wheels or 4.
prosoccer2115 2 years ago
Vette power!
baro605 2 years ago
baro605
i agree
VETTE for sure!
spoonhondaeg6b16a 2 years ago 2
The bikes will always get the vette from the start. Give the vette enough time and it will pass the bikes in top speed no problem.
950hpvette 2 years ago
you're dumb. bikes have top speeds of over 200mph too
CJDaTman 2 years ago
sure????
miugui2008 2 years ago
thats true, but a busa will beat any car, unless its a long race. (except maybe an F1)
ShuddupChip 2 years ago
Veyron beats hayabusa I thought?
DutchCommander 2 years ago
yea. not from the start tho, but a few seconds later probably.
ShuddupChip 2 years ago
I'd say they're about evenly matched up to about 170mph-190mph, then the Veyron would start pulling away. But don't forget I can go pick up a Busa tomorrow for £5,000, where as the Veyron is about £500,000
wookler 2 years ago
By that time the race is over though
motomike8012 2 years ago
im not so sure the busa should do 220-230mph so it would be a close race...
pyevids50 2 years ago
Dude, that busa woulda ripped all the bikes there.. if I rode it. ONE TURBO OR NOT.. and r1 maxes at at 190mph = 265khm or whatever and from jump street all the ikes made it to the line before the vette did, or group of people on all the vids, so in a qrt mile that vette aint shit.... tbh, sounds nice, but i've seen mustanges that would rip that!
magiccow64 2 years ago
lol, 180mph = 300kmh dude...
Slowlol 2 years ago
Slowlol
180mph = 288kph
(1 mile = 1.6 kilometers)
nigee008 2 years ago
what about taking that Vette on track against the bikes.
saxoryan 2 years ago
car better at cornering
spoonhondaeg6b16a 2 years ago
the busa smoked that vette.
coltz1993 2 years ago
R1 is turbo,right???
headbangerlover 2 years ago
is or has?
razzetamp 2 years ago
That turbuni sound always made me wanna die in a car accident :P
MansuriKabir 3 years ago
Comment removed
oreobabi17 3 years ago
the bike has to slow down to take the vid, this is rigged, i have whooped lambos with out a problem and your saying a vett lol
nathanielforgod 2 years ago 2
the 2008 R1 makes 190 mph (310 kph) 1/4 mile
(400 m) in 9.6 100 mph (160 kph) in 4.8 and
60 mph (100 kph) in 2.5
santiscu777 3 years ago
need sexy subscribers! plz
fannekka 3 years ago
I love the sound of the camera man's bike. TURBO'D!!!
SnowRocker88 3 years ago
a car will always be faster than a bike on top end when hooked up.
alex369 3 years ago 2
Ever seen Ghostrider's, turbo Hayabusa he likes riding around with one wheel touching the ground at 220mph? With no fairing by the way.
It's all relative with no absolutes.
ithicaplasma 3 years ago 2
But in every run on this vid, the camera bike has to short-shift to avoid overtaking the vette.
abssorb 3 years ago
will ALWAYS be faster ... depend when and where. On the streets nothing can beat a bike.
magickownage 3 years ago 2
Thank you for some truth wow too bad these car lovers can't exept this!
nathanielforgod 2 years ago 2
hahaha :P
Sadly even you got 1 million in your pocket u can drive betwenn.
Bike ?Not even a problem
magickownage 2 years ago
I do not understand your comment!
nathanielforgod 2 years ago
Think again...
turbonoshayabusa 2 years ago
@alex369
right it's 'bout the aerodynamic
/watch?v=zbMStoxjD4M
ReGGaEToNFLoW88 1 year ago
I ve seen tones of videos that are about car vs bike street racing.The race starts from 40 mph or more.My question is...Why dont they start,just once, from 0 mph?
XJigshawX 3 years ago
Just look it up I have a vid of this same vette racing a Busa on the 1/4 mile and been neck and neck. I also have a vid of an older c4 gen vette racing a 750 off the hole.
alex369 3 years ago
I'm not sure I'd call passing the R1 at damn near its top speed a "win", seeing as how the bike was ahead the whole time before that lol, but still nice vid thanks for posting! Hmm ok that's a weird contradiction because you said the 10R was the winner...even though the vette would have passed it pretty soon at like 180.
kj7687 3 years ago
Don't use the clutch except to start??? what about down shifting??
04R1Rules 4 years ago
the b2k callaway vette had the record before of 254.76 mph with around 800hp and 582trq if I am correct for fastest production car legally sold for the streets and we are talking in 1988 for does of you that did'nt know :) Its pretty interesting. It's has twin turbo and boosts a total of 52pounds.
alex369 4 years ago
nao tem pra ninguem busa!!!!!!!!
soneca666666 4 years ago
The r1 is the best any day because on a track with corners that go right and also some that go to the left ( a concept you americans have problems understanding ) it would smoke the lot of them.
feltrevoltpro 4 years ago
Lol. Damn straight. Real men race on the track.
philipp122 4 years ago
wow, nos busa fucking owned!
yoyo2171 4 years ago
vette gets owned waaaaaa
lukapimpster 4 years ago
Bike has no weight to it so ofcourse it'll outrun cars. But it's still just a bike. Most people prefer cars to bikes. Slightly more comfort and protection there.
reno93535 4 years ago
I beat a Triumph 955i ,which isnt the fastest bike around.But my supercharged mustang beat him rather easily ,to my surprise...It doesnt happen to often but sometimes cars win...You need a boat load of money to blow...
pitdawgg 4 years ago
Bah, bikes arent designed for top speeed.
TheZ07 4 years ago
new busa - £8,500. New Corvette - £55,000. Mods to make Corvette nearly as powerful as an R1 - £15,000? And if the guy on the R1 could actually ride then the Vette would still lose. It's a tried and tested fact that the only car to beat a bike on those sort of runs is the Bugatti Veyron, if anything else seems to win a race with a bike it's down to the fact the rider is shit. Yeah, your GSXR would take that Vette, so would a zx6r if it was ridden properly!
pcpsteele 4 years ago
Nearly as powerful?A vette is more powerful than almost ANY bike it's the power to weight,give a bike all the hp & tq that the vette has and see how fast you die,hell most bikes have what an average of 120hp where-as a stock z06 has 505.The Bugatti was put to shame by the fastest street legal vette by LPE which was a twin turbo z06 making 1000+hp,the bugatti is slow it took what 5 miles to get to 230+.the LPE vette made it to just 225+ in a standing mile with only two turbos
xlogixic 4 years ago
Actualy the Bugatti is the fastest stock car to both 150 and 220 mph, so it wasn't put to shame, but I catch your drift, The Bugatti is heavy because it's a luxury car, so a sports car with the same hp will beat it.
philipp122 4 years ago
Fastest stock car at what price? As much as that thing costs you could build something much faster. And i'm glad you catch my drift...most people are too busy humping their favorite car to pay attention to both sides
xlogixic 4 years ago
Lol true. Thing about the Veyron, it's a luxury car, so it weighs over 4100 pounds. It takes its advantage from the massive torque it produces that literally pushes the car to 250 mph, but its not as good of a track performer as other cars in its price range (a high price range lol).
philipp122 4 years ago
should have capitalized "high" lol, but yea its not bad...but i was taken back when i saw the video of the LPE vette going to 0-226 in a mile...i thought that was just disgusting
xlogixic 4 years ago
Distugtingly fast lol. Yeah, that's a pretty fast car. I wonder what the Veyron could do if you took of all the unneccesary weight and modded up the engine...
philipp122 4 years ago
I think most of the weight actually comes from whats needed on that car...i know the motor itself is heavy as hell and all the turbo's intercoolers are bound to be heavy also..
xlogixic 4 years ago
Lol true... the Bugatti probably has a lot of potential though. They used a 16 liter engine with 4 turbos to create a lot of reliable horsepower. I wonder what you could to if you unleashed its full potential... too bad they're much too nice and expensive to be doing any work on the car.
philipp122 4 years ago
thank you. im glad someone realizes it. just cuz the dudes racing the bike doesnt mean he really KNOWS how to ride the damn thing.
nevergoinbak1900 4 years ago
try looking at how fast u go on a bike for what you spend... the r1 costs about 20 grand (nz) brand new when the corvette would cost a hundred grand for a cheap 1,90 % of bikes get past at 150 ae? do these cars your talking about cost a million bucks or what? or were u talkn about the bikes that were made not to be fast? the fast ones top out at 300+ and the turbo ones between 350 and 400 kph. those turbo bikes are about 50 grand. it would cost several million to get a car capeable of that
shaunpapanuihigh 4 years ago
If that vette beat the R1, then that R1 driver must not know how to shift. By the way, my 07' GSXR 1000 would take that vette.
filcox 4 years ago
Oh my bike can beat your car.
Dude that vette would crush your bike.
I will give you a head start and shoot my BB GUN and I bet it beats your bike.
What are the bragging rights to beating a car on a bike.
When actually 90% of the bikes start getting passed when speeds hit 150+
Sigh....Where are the real drivers of the world.
I call to you
Shaice31 4 years ago
so what? I could show up in a car built for the salt flats that can do 250mph and beat the vette with a flyby, even if it does 0-60 in 10 seconds. What's the point of racing top speed? There's a reason people run 1/4 mile and not 5 mile.
fenderguy9 4 years ago
lol
filcox 3 years ago
zo6 team car the gixxer would probibly lose!
jakenyquist666 3 years ago
m1 team bike, the zo6 would probibly lose!
codyschuyler 3 years ago 2
im just curious how you know that your bike could take that vette? i own a gixxer also and i would love to take a vette but i wouldnt know that until i raced it! just curious..
jakenyquist666 3 years ago
What, your gixxer 600?
filcox 3 years ago
yea it is a gixxer 600 the vette was stock, and it was super close! it would of got me if we hadnt slowed down at 120!! so i would say a 1000 could take it! depends on the vetts mods!! some of those zo6s rip hard..just like the gixxer..
jakenyquist666 3 years ago
Not sure if you've ever driven a 1000 or not but the difference between the pull of a 600 and 1000 is day and night. I owned an R6 a couple of years ago before getting my gixxer 1000 and my R6 isn't even close. 1000's are animals.
filcox 3 years ago 4
iv ridden an 2005 r1 but didnt really open it up..I would like to test all the liter bikes, but i love my gixxer maybe soon a 1000..even with the the 600 the r1 only beats me in the quater in a second..it rips me after that...safe riding...
jakenyquist666 3 years ago
A second is huge in the quarter mile.
filcox 3 years ago
yea i cant wait to get a liter bike..
jakenyquist666 3 years ago 2
@filcox True, even the difference between my ZX-9R and my R1 is just amazing difference
94REDSC 1 year ago
lol...all that money in that vette and he sure didn't much with those variety of bikes. All in all awesome vehicles!!!
wzup31 4 years ago
bloodyhell threre fast.
911187 4 years ago
you all are fuckin retards. you act like a vette or any other car for that matter is in the same league as a bike. that bike probably weighs as much as the wheeles and tires on that vette. and on another topic... that vette prolly does have 600 something h/p because its probably supercharched. d
joeshew 5 years ago
It's sad that you need to upgrade the vette or get a z06 just to beat a stock street bike. An old R1 as a matter of fact.
How about a stock R1 vs a stock Vette?
trkStRR 5 years ago
if thats what you think then your hella stupid, do die. how much does a bike weigh? 800 pounds how much does a fucking corvette weigh? 3200 pounds you retard, thats 4 times as much, even if it had 4 times the horsepower and tq it still wouldnt matter, a 100 pound difference between cars is more dramatic than 100 pounds for a person. so you can only imagine how badly the corvette would lose. oh, no wait you cant. because your a stupid ignorant fuck.
plastikseraph 4 years ago
you are retarded, R1 would maybe weigh 440 pounds tops wet weight. Its all about power to weight ratio.
MikhaelWest 4 years ago
old motorbike
directsbs 5 years ago
2002 R1 less than $10K Vette $45 and that is not 600+ H.P. so add another $15-20K and lets try a 2007 R1 with 180 HP stock and the R1 is one bad ass litre bike you are talking fractions of a milla second less then a GSXR, but IMHO alot more reliable. the busa is a top speed bike not a road racer like the R1 or Gsxr. I have an 03 limited R1 for 4 years it is one bad ass bike i would like to have seen the run from a standing stop the vette would not have had a chance to catch up.
pyropysco 5 years ago
yeah while we're at it, lets compare air planes to boats!
plastikseraph 4 years ago
Lol, if it were a Z06, the bikes would'nt stand a chance..
VonReddick 5 years ago
so if thats a fact how come my gixxer beat a zo6! let me guess the driver in the car didnt know how to race..they should give passes to the retards who post stupid comments on the internet!
jakenyquist666 3 years ago
Did i say wich Z06??? Maybe i ment the fab. team car. It would easily have owned your bike... BTW, cars have slower acceleration, Because theyr weight is several times the bike, so in drags most cars gets owned by bikes. But put your bike up against the Z06 team car in Le Mans and see what happends...
VonReddick 3 years ago
vette got owned dirty by busa
namewho305 5 years ago
If you've got enough dough you can modify the vette to beat that nos busa hands down, and still have it be street legal
i486dx266 5 years ago
Yeah and if you've got enough dough you can modify the hayabusa to bitch slap every street legal car in the world.
gonzales8765 4 years ago
they're all bad ass but bikes are just too fast. you have to have like over 1,000HP to beat a bike
buddybestor 5 years ago
that vette has 690rwhp when the vid was taken
alex369 2 years ago
Depends on 2 things, setup of bike and the rider.
I've seen a Hayabusa get run over by a Ducati 999 that had Powercommander 3+NoS installed. Now that was a race!
TechnicalFreak 5 years ago
ya the kawi is faster than the r1
jimmydushku 5 years ago
No way the Zx10r went faster than the R1
xXMARTHXx 5 years ago
it has always been..
biba028 5 years ago
zx-10 is a more powerful bike, put the same rider on both bikes, and the ZX-10 would win a race like this.
The R1 is actually one of the lesser powered litre bikes, along with the fireblade (if lesser exists!) The GSXR-1000 and the ZX-10 are more or less on par.
huambo 5 years ago
bike are the kings
the zx10r was faster then the r1?
middlename 6 years ago