Censored by Conservapedia and ShockofGod's ego

[t0f0b0]

Everyone, Shock is an ass. Don't feed the troll.

[crazyinsane500]

I use encyclopedia dramatica as a more relieable source on reality than conservapedia. And ED is right about 70 percent more often than conservapedia. Trolls vs Conservatives, Trolls win.

[shockofgod]

Dude you really got to get a life rofl this is hilarious you spend all your time doing this ahahahahahahha I am crying tears of laughter right now. Dude you gotta get a life lol

[BluJugganaut]

@shockofgod Says the guy who uploads, like, 3 vids a day, mostly of him filming himself on a motorbike or playing crap video games and ranting on and on about a syndrome that he made up that isn't even funny.

You're just a foul little man, and I envy your life as much as I envy the life of a dung beetle.

[LordScrambles]

@BluJugganaut W00t W00t! Take that ShockofGod! That little bitch deleted all of my comments, even when I wasn't being hostile AT ALL. Then he blocked me. And you just BURNED HIM! Priceless...

[Socinus]

@shockofgod Big talk for a guy who censors his channel and videos like crazy

[lewismurray1]

@shockofgod oh look, the censorship nazi (dont even deny it, you hate everyone who isnt a pure white straight christian) what right do you have to tell others to get a life? you live in youtube and when you get off to sleep you are the property of god.

you are scum, you arent even human, you sacrificed your humanity long ago.

i notice how you only reply to people with views in the hundreds.

when your ass gets pwned by people like terroja you run, hide, cry and bitch to god and youtube.

[NicolSD]

@shockofgod I bet your eyes are brown. Why? Because you are full of crap!

[Godlesspanther]

In the description of one of my videos, I said something like, "if you want to laugh at the idiots here is a link to conservapedia," I would have to find it for exact wording -- but I'm not blocked from cspedia. The only half-way reasonable articles the they have consist of about three sentences. And they manage to fuck up some of those too. On one of my vids I had their cspedia logo with the "trustworthy" crossed out and called it "one fucked up encyclopedia." Their god probably hates me.

[BluJugganaut]

@Godlesspanther lol keep up the good work in dispelling the lies! =)

[Republica101]

Hm. It seems that you have found an enemy in andrew schafly. Good job!

[BluJugganaut]

@Republica101 For no reason at all =P

[RomansPwnedJesus]

@BluJugganaut Shock of God also blocked me for posting a serious video response (my video exposing a youtube friend of his as a liar), and he just used a childish remark by saying "atheism is crap."

Censorship shows that atheists win.

[BluJugganaut]

@RomansPwnedJesus  Or that they simply have no decent answers =)

[RomansPwnedJesus]

@BluJugganaut His YT buddy Onceforgivennowfree said the universe is 7000 years old and then denied that young earth creationists believe that dinosaurs lived with people.

If people have been around since the beginning of time (genesis) and dinosaurs existed at one point, the logical conclusion is that dinos lived with people.

How exactly do creationists expect to get away with such obvious lies? What idiots!

[BluJugganaut]

@RomansPwnedJesus It's all in the upbringing

[RomansPwnedJesus]

@BluJugganaut Onceforgivennowfree also can't complain about misrepresentation since conservapedia is well supported by his mate shockofgod.

Meanwhile, conservapedia itself says YECs believe that dinos lived with people.

[pilgrimpater]

ShockofGod has a larger article than Stephen Hawking. That's ALL any one needs to know about Conservipedia.

I love the bit about Creationists always beat Atheists in a debate. Now i understand at last. Censorship and Blocking is deemed by these retards as a victory.

[Eron2828]

@pilgrimpater

There more about creationists beating "atheists" in debate. In some debates a few years ago, the audience was polled on who "won" the debate--they tended to be more positive to the creat. side.

The reason for this is not hard to fathom. For one, creat.'s "arguments" appeal to emotion, are extremely simple, and very, very broad. On the other hand, sci.'s make long, complex debunks of creationist claims.

Also, the location of the debates was likely favorable to creationists.

[pilgrimpater]

@Eron2828 Well i was making my judgement on the YT community and Shockofgod's radio show where dissenters are spoken over, interrupted or simply cut off. I take your point though. The Creos are better salesman. They have to be as the product is utter crap.

[BluJugganaut]

@pilgrimpater I think you've hit the nail on the head =)

[Eron2828]

@pilgrimpater

Spot on.