The Piano was Prokofiev's choice instrument for personal expression. If you want to hear his most personal music, it's all there. ALL his piano music is so wonderful, so many brilliant ideas, it's mind blowing. It's like looking into his soul.
Not bad for a degree composition for a music student. (Prokofiev) ..and then to demand to play it yourself at its first performance. Good job Glazunov could see the guy's talent. Martha plays it a little slower than I'm used to but hell...what a technique!!!!
Good lord... Martha. I just giggle when she plays. It's like... how does she make it look so impossibly simple, yet make it sound so incredibly impossible? And she barely breaks a sweat. :-/
Of all the versions I've heard on YouTube, which includes Richter, Kissen, which doesn't display the complete Ashkenazy version, Martha's is the only one with the right propulsion, the right energy, the adequate momentum to move me the way Prokofiev wanted us to move. The orchestra just isn't up to the spacial needs of the ethereal moments.
Martha Argerich is one of the most wonderful musicians i've ever seen. Her ideas about music are extremely deep. Her playing absolutely demonstrates this.
Amazing that quite some russian composers dared and managed to create music against the wishes of the powerful communist nomenclatura. That is true also for many writers.
My cat Molotov and I are going out now for some donuts if we can find them. Tim Horton's are the best, but they are not available here. So I will make do with some other kind. Molotov is a former Soviet cat, he still retains many communist tendencies, and I do think he probably still is a communist. I say this by the way he acts around the house. He does enjoy Russian composers, particularly Prokofiev and Shostakovich. He liked this video, at least I interpret him in that manner.
I hope that Molotov enjoyed this performance of Prokofiev's Piano Concerto #1. I'm sure if Martha was playing to impress anybody that night it would have been for Molotov.
Wow, I must have listened to this piece a dozen times, but I have never watched it being played before. It's fascinating to see the pianist at work; you can really see how technically challenging a work it is.
My favorite aspect of this piece is the way that, having simply followed the main theme at the beginning, in the recapitulation at the end, the piano opens up and plays an amazing series of notes, creating that bitter-sweet orchestral texture unique to Prokofiev.
I love Prokofiev--his music is disturbing, ominous, turbulent, sinister--it deserves to be in the background of most Hitchcock movies--I love Hitchcock too.
Yes, a very good description; but for all its haunting moments, it is to me also full of lyrical passages of great beauty. Prokofiev has this incredible ability to eke out melodies against the grain where you would not think it possible, and the melodies themselves are tremendously fragile, prone to dissolving suddenly with an unexpected interval or an orchestral volte-face.
I'm sure that you are correct. I'm a novice when it comes to classical music. I love this guy--it's electrifying and he mesmerizes me. I like all the Russians--Rachmaninov, Tchaikovsky, and Prokofiev--I also like Martha Argerich. If you received my other e-mail, disregard the comment about the 1st concerto--I thought it was a different piece that Martha Argerich was playing. Thank you for your comment.
An excellent description. I love how you describe the melodies as "fragile." or ephemeral. Lt. Kije comes to mind, especially the trumpets from off-stage (birth of Kije).
I love Argerich but she seems to be holding back the conductor on the Introduction, compared with other Prof 1's I've heard. She usually just "goes for it"......her technique is awesome!!
I never really understood appreciating a piece of music for its technicality. Chopin concertos for example, are beautiful piano showcases, with a disturbing lack of fcility in writing parts for strings. they play no part in any sort of development.
You have to consider (In Chopin's case) that his concerto's were written early on in his compositional development. Most everyone would agree with your view of them. They are a sort of conundrum of the repertoire.
Try understanding the appreciation of a piece for its technicality in terms of it's masterful construction, not just how quickly the fingers are required to move on the keyboard. Which is exactly the case with Prokofiev's Piano concerto's (perhaps with the exception of his fourth).
I'm complete surprised because of the technique, but I don't think is it a really good sound piece. Tchaikovsky's 1st piano concerto is much better technically, if we are refering with this point of comparing
Tchaikovsky wrote Swan Lake, Prokofiev for Romeo & Juliet... If I could have the talent and what they got for write this no-words-to-describe- music, I´ll write for Aquiles & Patroclo je, since I´m homosexual, but in anycase that´s not the point, Amazing performance, you know, I do physical exercise with it and it´s great (sorry my bad english) to hear it and to fake I´m the pianist during the concerto, :).
lol ! I do exactly the same thing ! Well actually, I jump on my bed while hearing this or any other Prokofiev concerto and I do as if I was the Pianist..... Strange, I thought I was the only one doing this kind of strange things...
is this more difficult than Prokofiev's 2nd concerto.. i hear the 2nd is the most difficult, but looking at the music for both, and having done some sight reading it seems this one is more difficult? anyone have an opinion?
This is my all-time favorite concerto movement. I love it. I just love it. I love anything by Prokofiev, and this piece brings tears to my eyes every time I listen to it.
Alexander always wears a hairclip to hold his hair back.... or at least he did the last time I performed with him. Amazing musician ... amazing pianist...
Such control at that speed...seems almost impossible! Her fingering is perfect, especially on the repeated note sections. Definitely worth trying for those attempting this piece. (who better to follow anyway, ya?)
Martha Argerich is an electric and stunning force. Prokofiev's music has a wonderful, yet peculiar quality, as if extremely vivid dreams were translated into music. Well anyways, perfect combination!
Great to see and hear. Martha Argerich is a natural when it comes to Prokofiev and it's a pity that she's never got round to playing the 2nd concerto. Her recording of Prokofiev's 3rd has to be the greatest I've heard.
Martha Argerich is probably one of my favorite performers. She always looks as great as she sounds :] and she has such awesome hair too lol.
LOVE this concerto.
agreatguy6 1 year ago
Everytime I hear this I feel like I just survived a hurricane in a canoe
iHeartFerenc 1 year ago 2
I AM MARTHA ARGERICH. I AM RUSSIAN AND I'LL CRUSH YOU WITH SUPER POWER HANDS OF MINE. hahaha. just kidding. gotta love her.
PIAN0PLAYER5 1 year ago
@PIAN0PLAYER5 ...She is Argentine.. but yes she probably would
opusyte 1 year ago
Go Martha! You have this wonderful concerto nailed. I have never heard it better played.
elgar34 1 year ago 2
The Piano was Prokofiev's choice instrument for personal expression. If you want to hear his most personal music, it's all there. ALL his piano music is so wonderful, so many brilliant ideas, it's mind blowing. It's like looking into his soul.
Flutist11 1 year ago
Not bad for a degree composition for a music student. (Prokofiev) ..and then to demand to play it yourself at its first performance. Good job Glazunov could see the guy's talent. Martha plays it a little slower than I'm used to but hell...what a technique!!!!
silverdalesapphires 1 year ago
Good lord... Martha. I just giggle when she plays. It's like... how does she make it look so impossibly simple, yet make it sound so incredibly impossible? And she barely breaks a sweat. :-/
clairannette 1 year ago
wonderful bright music by prokofiev
JimmyGr90 1 year ago
3番が人気あるけれど、私はこの1番が好きだ。
wingingerd 1 year ago
Of all the versions I've heard on YouTube, which includes Richter, Kissen, which doesn't display the complete Ashkenazy version, Martha's is the only one with the right propulsion, the right energy, the adequate momentum to move me the way Prokofiev wanted us to move. The orchestra just isn't up to the spacial needs of the ethereal moments.
runupahill1 1 year ago 2
it has some similarity with mvt 3
markopianist 1 year ago
yea it does
its basically a big one mvt piece that has the same theme occurrin 3x (1 in each section)
joboy1992jesto 1 year ago
I played this without orchestra but no.3 with orchesra. but not like this
chad410 1 year ago
I like singing Chante Neol to the first theme
oelte 1 year ago
Comment removed
oelte 1 year ago
Comment removed
oelte 1 year ago
aagghh i'm gonna play this concerto this year..<3
pianiss 1 year ago
Comment removed
oelte 1 year ago
Martha Argerich is one of the most wonderful musicians i've ever seen. Her ideas about music are extremely deep. Her playing absolutely demonstrates this.
Vlessgorian 2 years ago 4
Her hands are friggin' huge...and sure.
darnott44 2 years ago 3
Amazing that quite some russian composers dared and managed to create music against the wishes of the powerful communist nomenclatura. That is true also for many writers.
True heroic russians.
silverbud 2 years ago 17
ahhh damn! i accidentally pressed thumbs down./...:(
im in total agreement with you!
so inspiring
DustinGuitar 2 years ago 3
actually this piece is pre-soviet, but i agree that it is excellent.
cochleatopic 2 years ago
My cat Molotov and I are going out now for some donuts if we can find them. Tim Horton's are the best, but they are not available here. So I will make do with some other kind. Molotov is a former Soviet cat, he still retains many communist tendencies, and I do think he probably still is a communist. I say this by the way he acts around the house. He does enjoy Russian composers, particularly Prokofiev and Shostakovich. He liked this video, at least I interpret him in that manner.
buffuzo 2 years ago 50
I hope that Molotov enjoyed this performance of Prokofiev's Piano Concerto #1. I'm sure if Martha was playing to impress anybody that night it would have been for Molotov.
Eradicator00987 2 years ago 7
I remember you! You're the one with the egalitarian cat. I've always enjoyed reading your comments.
pookiehohn 2 years ago
Comment removed
msawaryn1 1 year ago
@buffuzo
my cat has formal music training in Peabody student's housing.
And he loves Argerich the most!
raincatw 1 year ago
Wow, I must have listened to this piece a dozen times, but I have never watched it being played before. It's fascinating to see the pianist at work; you can really see how technically challenging a work it is.
My favorite aspect of this piece is the way that, having simply followed the main theme at the beginning, in the recapitulation at the end, the piano opens up and plays an amazing series of notes, creating that bitter-sweet orchestral texture unique to Prokofiev.
bluecobalt27 2 years ago 3
Such thrilling music. Prokofiev is in a class of his own as far as I'm concerned.
pljms 2 years ago 2
I love Prokofiev--his music is disturbing, ominous, turbulent, sinister--it deserves to be in the background of most Hitchcock movies--I love Hitchcock too.
124bjw 2 years ago 2
Yes, a very good description; but for all its haunting moments, it is to me also full of lyrical passages of great beauty. Prokofiev has this incredible ability to eke out melodies against the grain where you would not think it possible, and the melodies themselves are tremendously fragile, prone to dissolving suddenly with an unexpected interval or an orchestral volte-face.
bluecobalt27 2 years ago
Comment removed
124bjw 2 years ago
I'm sure that you are correct. I'm a novice when it comes to classical music. I love this guy--it's electrifying and he mesmerizes me. I like all the Russians--Rachmaninov, Tchaikovsky, and Prokofiev--I also like Martha Argerich. If you received my other e-mail, disregard the comment about the 1st concerto--I thought it was a different piece that Martha Argerich was playing. Thank you for your comment.
124bjw 2 years ago
An excellent description. I love how you describe the melodies as "fragile." or ephemeral. Lt. Kije comes to mind, especially the trumpets from off-stage (birth of Kije).
vibraharp226 2 years ago
the queen of piano at work
miliona1re 2 years ago 4
Holy shit
tmntt 2 years ago 4
Why is it that Argerich always plays at impressive but inappropriate speeds? For my taste, anyway.
madgamer23 2 years ago
I love Argerich but she seems to be holding back the conductor on the Introduction, compared with other Prof 1's I've heard. She usually just "goes for it"......her technique is awesome!!
silverdalesapphires 2 years ago
right... she has her tempo in mind... maybe because they didn't have rehearsal... anyway she's great
filippinijazz 2 years ago
Bravo!!!
Boriska2008 2 years ago 2
Brava... she's female! ;-)
filippinijazz 2 years ago 2
well I think that she is better when she was young
mestreliszt 2 years ago
che suono fantastico...... La amo!!!
flic71 2 years ago
ehi... anche io la amo! sono geloso! ;-)
filippinijazz 2 years ago 2
beleza perfeicao e força neste 1 mov Martha como sempre a melhor
MrJoaomenegaz 2 years ago
questa donna è spettacolare, fantasmagorica, irraggiungibile.......
l'inizio del concerto poi è superbo!!!
flic71 2 years ago 2
è la n.1
filippinijazz 2 years ago
OMG
superhao69 2 years ago
Martha Argerich is awesome. She really brings her personal experience into the performance. She is simply very unique and wonderful.
iysum 2 years ago 6
I never really understood appreciating a piece of music for its technicality. Chopin concertos for example, are beautiful piano showcases, with a disturbing lack of fcility in writing parts for strings. they play no part in any sort of development.
thomasragz 2 years ago
You have to consider (In Chopin's case) that his concerto's were written early on in his compositional development. Most everyone would agree with your view of them. They are a sort of conundrum of the repertoire.
Try understanding the appreciation of a piece for its technicality in terms of it's masterful construction, not just how quickly the fingers are required to move on the keyboard. Which is exactly the case with Prokofiev's Piano concerto's (perhaps with the exception of his fourth).
brandon71085 2 years ago
I'm complete surprised because of the technique, but I don't think is it a really good sound piece. Tchaikovsky's 1st piano concerto is much better technically, if we are refering with this point of comparing
holamen12 2 years ago
The tchaik 1st concerto is the most terribly structured piece ever.
Haeronthegreat 2 years ago
Tchaikovsky wrote Swan Lake, Prokofiev for Romeo & Juliet... If I could have the talent and what they got for write this no-words-to-describe- music, I´ll write for Aquiles & Patroclo je, since I´m homosexual, but in anycase that´s not the point, Amazing performance, you know, I do physical exercise with it and it´s great (sorry my bad english) to hear it and to fake I´m the pianist during the concerto, :).
SickForest 2 years ago 4
lol ! I do exactly the same thing ! Well actually, I jump on my bed while hearing this or any other Prokofiev concerto and I do as if I was the Pianist..... Strange, I thought I was the only one doing this kind of strange things...
meriadocbrandebouc 2 years ago 3
welcome to the world of 'air-piano' my friends
777cc777 2 years ago
wah nice !!!
I love russian composer as like
Rachmaninoff ,tchaikovsky and prokofiev
KevinR3i 3 years ago 7
Not to nitpick, but technically Prokofiev is from Ukraine (although he did train in St. Petersburg). I do agree, they all wrote great music.
werewethere 2 years ago
It was Russia at the time
777cc777 2 years ago
Part of the Russian empire at the time, true, but culturally Ukraine.
werewethere 2 years ago 2
is this more difficult than Prokofiev's 2nd concerto.. i hear the 2nd is the most difficult, but looking at the music for both, and having done some sight reading it seems this one is more difficult? anyone have an opinion?
davidbaker03 3 years ago 2
I heard that it was the second, yundi lee said in one of his intervieuws that the second consert was the most difficult consert he ever had played
somedudeplayingpiano 2 years ago
I think the 5th is the hardest. It's a shame that it doesn't get more play.
Hervinbalfour 2 years ago 2
the 2nd is more strenuous but both call for different techniques so it is hard to separate them on purely technical grounds of difficulty
afertyus1000 2 years ago
Funny, I always have been told that #3 is the hardest. Then again, none of them are easy.
werewethere 2 years ago
nah, not sure i can agree, i'm learning the 3rd, but i wouldn't dream off attempting the second, plus no. 3 is much better, :)
kyleclef 2 years ago
Simply splended thanks for posting!
MicTheMailman 3 years ago
One can clearly see how Prokofiev won a competition at his conservatory for writing this piece.
mathpianist93 3 years ago
a little fast but thats what keeps the adrenalin!
willwuu 3 years ago
you prefer a more broad tempo?
mathpianist93 3 years ago
I like the weird stuff of prokofiev:)
Kalen1457 3 years ago 2
This is my all-time favorite concerto movement. I love it. I just love it. I love anything by Prokofiev, and this piece brings tears to my eyes every time I listen to it.
Thank you for posting it!
AzulEsperanza 3 years ago 6
She is made of steel!!!
upka619 3 years ago
She's made of something that we, normal humans, can't define!
fabio0077 3 years ago 2
sorry "us"
fabio0077 3 years ago
I found that truly amazing!!!! Thanks for posting it.
DPinFL 3 years ago
I LOVE MARTHA.....platonically of course, she's so amazing.
Pianist54d 3 years ago
i love her more...
Timmytimtimtm 3 years ago
non-platonically, for me, of course...
gc65531941 3 years ago
I always thought this concerto would make a great opening to a film.
marcparella 3 years ago 2
I would like to meet you someday,Ms. Argerich!!!
nikki0019 3 years ago 4
how can she have so much energy! OMG!
beaver7756 3 years ago 5
omg it's so O_o magnifique
marwan280 3 years ago
whats that on the side of the conducters head?
turtlesturtles2 3 years ago
oh nevermind
turtlesturtles2 3 years ago
Alexander always wears a hairclip to hold his hair back.... or at least he did the last time I performed with him. Amazing musician ... amazing pianist...
clairannette 3 years ago
oh ok thx
turtlesturtles2 3 years ago
pause at 0:55 its kind of weird
turtlesturtles2 3 years ago
yep... that's it... greying hair combined with his trademark hair clip... haha.
clairannette 3 years ago
wow, she plays so accccccurately at such a fast tempo..
tlanigan 3 years ago
WOW.
can her technique get any better?
shes godly...
no1canstopme93 3 years ago
SHE IS MY IDOL!!!!! I LUV YOU MARTHA!
domkim1986 3 years ago
Such control at that speed...seems almost impossible! Her fingering is perfect, especially on the repeated note sections. Definitely worth trying for those attempting this piece. (who better to follow anyway, ya?)
TruBlu509 3 years ago 2
This is fantastic and remember it is a live performance. Andrei Gavrilov did a fantastic early recording of this with Sir Simon Rattle in the 1970s.
cattleman6420012000 3 years ago
Godlike technique
Anders039 3 years ago 3
bravo
anfalagu 3 years ago
amazing ! 5 stars !
atralfalgar 3 years ago 2
what an unbecoming concert venue for one of the best pianists
Chopinm4n 3 years ago 2
Martha Argerich is an electric and stunning force. Prokofiev's music has a wonderful, yet peculiar quality, as if extremely vivid dreams were translated into music. Well anyways, perfect combination!
fsugue 3 years ago
she seems to beat the berezovskys horowitzes luganskys volodoses to pulp,not sure about hamelin though
afertyus1000 3 years ago 2
This is superb!
TadayukionComposing 3 years ago 2
Qué bien que toca esta señora. Pensar que fué compañera de conservatorio de mi madre.
lecheenpolvo 3 years ago
Great conduction Maestro Rabinovitch.
arthurcrescendo 3 years ago
Umbeliveble !!!!!!1111
I plaeyd that concerto and i think Beroff's recording was best. But Martha win!!!!!!!
jepy82 3 years ago
This is very similar to Tchaikovksy piano concerto nº1.
The begining, the develop,but in modern stlye.Hear after that the first movment of Tchaikovsky piano concerto 1.
And both in D flat major(Tchaikovsky piano concerto 1 is in B flat minor, but begins with relative key of D flar major).
Great performance, very very good!
ArturoAlejandroS 3 years ago 2
Great to see and hear. Martha Argerich is a natural when it comes to Prokofiev and it's a pity that she's never got round to playing the 2nd concerto. Her recording of Prokofiev's 3rd has to be the greatest I've heard.
pljms 3 years ago 3