Without CO2 (carbon dioxide), O2 (oxygen) and H2O (water), let's face it: life wouldn't exist at all. All this crap talk about CO2 being a pollutant is just as silly "dihydrogen monoxide" hype, with the exception that the "dihydrogen monoxide" hype was a JOKE - while CO2 alarmists are *not* kidding.
Clearly, we are moving on to another dark ages if this madness does not stop.
He is correct. Ultimately, the global warming advocates will say "The world is in too much danger to allow democracy to determine the fate of the planet" In effect some AGW proponents will advocate getting rid of democracy in order to save the world. This make AGW proponents no different than say the Khamer Rouge
Back long before all this CO2 hysteria, sometime in the early 70s, I had a conversation with my employer, a biochemist, he claimed CO2 and CO were nature's redistribution mechanism for the redistribution of carbon critical for life to cover the globe. We are carbon based life, without it life on earth would at best be confined to small isolated pockets.
If true, isn't this hate of CO2 in truth the hate of life itself?
How can one criminalize life's building block but not life?
I hope you are right and I hope that those who are in power start listening to more intelligent arguements and understanding.
This green house gas misunderstanding is so widespread that it's gone a take a miracle to stop Obama from signing the Copenhagen treaty and causeing much hardship on us all.
Without CO2 (carbon dioxide), O2 (oxygen) and H2O (water), let's face it: life wouldn't exist at all. All this crap talk about CO2 being a pollutant is just as silly "dihydrogen monoxide" hype, with the exception that the "dihydrogen monoxide" hype was a JOKE - while CO2 alarmists are *not* kidding.
Clearly, we are moving on to another dark ages if this madness does not stop.
Wejer3 2 years ago
He is correct. Ultimately, the global warming advocates will say "The world is in too much danger to allow democracy to determine the fate of the planet" In effect some AGW proponents will advocate getting rid of democracy in order to save the world. This make AGW proponents no different than say the Khamer Rouge
gaguy1967 2 years ago
Back long before all this CO2 hysteria, sometime in the early 70s, I had a conversation with my employer, a biochemist, he claimed CO2 and CO were nature's redistribution mechanism for the redistribution of carbon critical for life to cover the globe. We are carbon based life, without it life on earth would at best be confined to small isolated pockets.
If true, isn't this hate of CO2 in truth the hate of life itself?
How can one criminalize life's building block but not life?
RatkoUSA 2 years ago
I hope you are right and I hope that those who are in power start listening to more intelligent arguements and understanding.
This green house gas misunderstanding is so widespread that it's gone a take a miracle to stop Obama from signing the Copenhagen treaty and causeing much hardship on us all.
eezyone 2 years ago