Added: 4 years ago
From: zxwar
Views: 37,396
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • indeed althought i detest nazis cause i am greek!

    great revolutanary that time tactic,dont forget that nazis that time had pantzers 1-2 and some chech tanks and not the later much improved pantzers 3-4 or tigers!

    they took france with reduculous powerless tanks !

  • "the unwary nations of Europe"? they were all pretty wary when they were murdering germans in Poland and Czechland, so don't make like they were all innocent. They forced Germany into a war she never wanted. How about Judea declares war on Germany , also.

  • @germaniajim yeah many people dont know about this :( i never agreed w/what hitler did to innocent civs especially children but the fact is he went to whatever length possible to purge his country out of the grips of centralised bankers whether they where jewish n my opinoin doesnt matter but yea i agree

  • @germaniajim Adolf Hitler wanted a war of Extermination, Read Mein Kampf. It was Hitler who started the war, Hitler wanted to unite parts of Germany that had been lost in the Great war, Whitch was illegal the Germans had gave the land away in a Treaty. Hitler had signed and agreed never to invade any FREE nation and Poland was at the top of that list, Hiter just as usual broke his word, The British asked the Austrian dictator to leave and Hitler refused whitch started the war, DUE TO HITLER!

  • @martynrobin121 I really hate hitler, and i blame him for a lot. but hes not the only man responsible for a break out in the war.

    there was bank sabotage on germany because of their turning away from international economy(apparently its a club were you cant say no),smigly made it clear since 1937 he wanted war with germany and as he said it he would extend the border to berlin

    secret alliances made by the allies(which according to their laws was illegal)

    etc.

    there are too many to blame

  • anglo-saxon arrogance!

  • Stephen Walsh, good insight on this video, bad speaker otherwise. can barely understand his gayish voice and lazy manner of speaking

  • german general staff had over 15 genius with 180 I.Q.

  • Blitzkrieg is such an impressive war doctrine. I don't credit Hitler but his generals revolutionzed modern warfare like no other.

  • The heart of the Panzer design was with Guderian, not Hitler

  • The funny thing about this is Germany had extremely close ties w/ Russia/Communists. They were quite thrilled in WWI when Russia stopped fighting/declared peace(from the Bolshevik Revolution).Germany was conducting military exercises & tech

    advancements in Russia during early WWII.

    In hindsight it would have been more beneficial to the Nazi regime if they allied themselves with Russia; dividing the world between Nationalists(God)/Commies(Godl­ess) instead of Capitalists/Commies.

  • Don't bring god into it, god doesn't exist, and WW2 is absolute proof of that.

    Germany knew Russia was their ideological enemy over 500 years ago. Fighting between Germany and Russia in WW1 was just as brutal as it was in the second, except in the first world war it was on a much smaller scale.

    Germany only had close ties with Russia because Russia was very secretive, and they knew they could conduct exercises there without the west finding out. Hitler always knew he would attack them.

  • lol... so if god "doesn't" exist how do you explain ancient egypt... (it is the creative mind of spirit which drives the subject of science & war... the art form of human spirit relating to a higher order overseen by a creator/architect)

    if there is a design then there is a designer; creation/creator; plan/planner

    unless you want to try and convince me in details how random molecules can come together & produce or result in a biological electro-chemical computer known as the human brain

  • How do I explain ancient Egypt? A culture that grew.

    There may well be a god, but if there is it is not the god that any religion we know of envisions. Our earthly, man-made religions claim god to be a perfect being, but all one need to do is look at the most imperfect being in the universe - man - to see that there is absolutely no way god is what we think he is.

    The world is fucked, and i have seen some disgusting things that would make your stomach turn. No god would allow this.

  • "unless you want to try and convince me in details how random molecules can come together & produce or result in a biological electro-chemical computer known as the human brain" Prove there is a god.

  • thatkidinthegreenhat: what kind of fuckin proof are u talkin about?

    When I mean God, the-kid-in-the-green-hat, I don't mean some motherfucker who somehow gave birth to Jewish woman somewhere in the desert who "watches" over us & decides all kinds of shit for us.

    I mean God/Goddess/Spirit as in a higher order, a higher (& maybe supreme) intelligence. It takes intelligence to wield & create order. The unseen force is far superior than physical matter.

    Can you fit that much into your head?

  • @thatkidinthegreenhat how about you prove to me there's not Zues or Odin, and I'll use your method.

  • WW 2 did not prove or disapprove anything having to do w/ "god" or spiritualism.

    All things have a male aspect or female. Things are inspired from this to create;it

    takes a man to envision a rocket & launch projectiles;it is masculine for mankind to build such things becuz a missle is

    subconcious art for a prick; the same idea applies for the egyptian obelisk (the symbol of the masculine force) standing on White House property

    i think u need to revise how u interpret ur worldly environment

  • BUt the reds were their truly enemy. The mistake of the Nazi was rather letting hitler to go mad and try to atack england and ussr almost at the same time. shame, they should finnished the brits first, sing a treaty of peace with the yankees and then atack the bloody commis. :D

  • That's the problem, the Luftwaffe were unable to "Finnish" the British, and this meant Hitler turned his attention towards the east.

  • well its not so much that the luftwaffe didnt finish them. ive spoken to british veterans and the problem was that the luftwaffe started bombing the countryside. apparently if they hadnt dispersed their own attacks they could have won. I think Hitler's own stupidity caused the luftwaffe to fail. and all of the german generals would agree with this statement if there was no SS aiming a gun behind their heads which wasnt literally the case but they all knew this was the threat

  • they may have won in russia, but they were still fighting half the world, and they didnt have neither the material nor the manpower to continue a full skale war both i russia africa and the atlantic

  • They had the material just not the determination and manpower the Russian's possessed. Had Germany held off an invasion in Russia they could have taken Britain. Not fully conquering France was also a bad decision as it allowed operating room to the allies.

  • The Russians didnt have any determination.They were fleeing like rats at the sound of German guns & were only convinced to fight after Stalin declared "The Patriotic War",being more brutal to the Russians & other ethnics living in USSR,torturing & mass killing all deserting soldiers & any1 who fled the front.They had more to fear from Stalin than they did from Hitler;that's what convinced them to fight.

    Manpower is the only factor the Russians had.

  • Ah but they did have determination and that determination was aroused by fear.

  • hitler and his army did not win in russia. Yet they were still fighting half the world. Hitler made stupid choices but he had the right idea during the manufacture of the tanks that were considered the best fighting vehicles of WW2, the mk 2 and mk 3 panzer were still used in africa at the end of the war. When the panzer mk 4 and tiger and koenigstiger finally made it to production they had a russian kill ratio of 1-4 and a british of 1-3 so i dont see how they lost the war due to manpower

  • yes, they destroyed far more tanks and planes than they lost, but still there where just outnumbered. the russians and american had often more than twice as many tanks in the field no matter how many the germans destroyed.

  • also true, apparently the germans needed a kill ratio of 1-9 to better the russians (im not sure about the americans?) But as i said, Hitler made stupid decisions. He could have trained alot of the jew population to man the tanks(either that or work in the factorys therefore putting more tanks in the field) Alas i must say you are right on all fronts, the americans and russians had worse tanks but the numbers made up for it.

  • i agree, Hitler should have died in 1940, then maybe the rest of the nazi regime would fall and europe would have been spared 5 more years of war and destruction

  • If Hitler died in 1940 there wouldn't have been peace but this: The RAF would eventually be rendered useless due to mass German production of Focke Wulf 190s and a variety, if u will, of Jet Fighters (Adolf Galland would've had his way indefinitely). The invasion of the USSR would've happened anyway but in 1942 instead of 1941. Germany would've obliterated Leningrad & Moscow before any special undertaking further in the USSR.

    The war would be different if he died in 1940. Very different.

  • russia didnt have bad tanks

    it had the best overall tank in the war

  • yeah sure

  • if hitler let his generals do what they wanted they would have done alot better. hitler f'ed up so many things and cost them the war.

  • good stuff manstein and guderian are genius!

  • cool thx for upload!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more