@Boffinme80 he does play the organ, when Christine wakes up and walks out to see him he is playing it. I went to see the stage show when i was 7 years old for my birthday and have been every year for the past 11 years. I love this because i think it captures all the magic of the stage and it allows Andrew lloyed webber to do things on this that he couldnt on stage
Even if it doesn't capture the magic, this version is still quite amazing! And if you don't like this version, then you shouldn't read the book. This movie is really more related to the original book than the Broad Way show.
This is why this movie is such a disappointment. It fails to capture the magic. Everyone all thought the movie would be great and sadly, it isn't. They missed out really important parts that were from the stage show, Masquerade was COMPLETELY different as was Point of No Return, the Phantom's lair was too bright, he didn't even play the frigging organ! Not only is the stage show fantastic becausr it feels like you're actually there but it 's the passion and the wonderful atmosphere.
@boffinme80 It was a disappointment because your comparing it. Theater and Hollywood are completely different mediums each with their own advantages. Theater's being your actually there and in awe at your suroundings. Hollywood's being the ability to add effects in post production which are not possible, or safe, to do witha live audience. I have not seen the bradoway show, but I want to. I found this movie amazing regardless. Theater and Hollywood should never be compared.
@LordDarcia It's not because I'm comparing it. It was just a disappointment overall. The singing, the acting and they even changed it in some ways as well. Like Point of No Return for example and the rooftop scene.
Yes, I agree it seems more reasonable that it would be Meg rather than her mother, but as far as the dates go, remember that much of the movie was re-written compared to the stage show (too bad), and in the original production, the auction takes place in 1905, and the overture takes you back to 1881, NOT 1870 like in the movie....
no it wouldnt, it would make her mademoiselle Giry. In english, she was called Mrs Giry, not miss Giry.
But do we really need to question it, its something the director did wrong. The movie was set in 1871, and yet he ignores that France was at war at that time. Additionally, hes the guy that put nipples on the batsuit.
one point to add - if the auctioneer knew her last name, odds are he knew her marital status
But lets do some simple maths
Christine was 16 in 1871 - born 1855. Presumably giry jnr was the same age. Raoul would have been 5 years older - born 1850. If Giry snr was 17 when she had meg, she'd have been born 1833.
If in theory you went by Giry snr would be 86, giry jnr would be 69. It could still plausibly be the mother
Either way - Joel Schumaker put nipples on the batsuit
@MATTandMUSIC saaaame i've seen the us tour that's running right now (tim martin gleason as phantom) 3 times and ohhhh my goodness every time during overture my jaw was either on the floor or i was smiling like a kid at christmas
Yes, the stage version is so much better than the movie. They changed quite a bit for the movie version...ie: the lack of the thumping bass when he's beckoning Christine to the mirror; the very chinsey red death costume in Masquerade...just to name a couple.
You haven't experienced Phantom 'till you've seen it on stage
IT IS UNBELIEVABLE. SERIOUSLY, it will make you cry like a baby! It's sooo moving and it will actually give you the shivers. I honestly could cry thinking about it (is that pathetic) it's just so wonderful.
I was actually disappointed in alot of the movie including this part--compared to the stage version, the opening chords of the overture in the movie are fairly weak...also, I don't really like the extension on the end. My opinion is, if you want to truely experience the magic of Phantom, see the stage show, NOT the movie.
Well, I'm sure that everybody who has seen this show would surely rather see the stage show, but for people who can't afford it or are incapable of going for one reason or the other, this is the next best thing.
Yes, I agree the stage show is ten times better but I thought they didn't do a half bad job of the overture/prologue. However it will of course never match the stage show. I was like in total awe during the whole opening, I thought, "this cannot get any better" it just seemed to feed my every desire (if that sounds nuts) but it really is that moving and emotional.
i saw this on broadway and this scene was amazing. when they pulled the chandelier up sparks were flying out of it and the music started getting load and...it was just. WOW
I saw this in a small theatre the first day it came out, never seen it didn't know what to expect. The organ starts, I got surround sound around me and my heart starts pounding with the music. Whooo! Thats how to watch this flick
And the end of it is where, exactly?
MultiBelle22 4 months ago
@Boffinme80 he does play the organ, when Christine wakes up and walks out to see him he is playing it. I went to see the stage show when i was 7 years old for my birthday and have been every year for the past 11 years. I love this because i think it captures all the magic of the stage and it allows Andrew lloyed webber to do things on this that he couldnt on stage
XxPhoenix14741xX 4 months ago
WORLD'S MOST EPIC OVERTURE EVER!!!!!!!
RedRosesLast4eva 8 months ago
Even if it doesn't capture the magic, this version is still quite amazing! And if you don't like this version, then you shouldn't read the book. This movie is really more related to the original book than the Broad Way show.
BlackFlute135 1 year ago 2
This version of the overture sucks
phantomofopera91 1 year ago
like the masquerade , peaceful version
annonimuz2 1 year ago
This is why this movie is such a disappointment. It fails to capture the magic. Everyone all thought the movie would be great and sadly, it isn't. They missed out really important parts that were from the stage show, Masquerade was COMPLETELY different as was Point of No Return, the Phantom's lair was too bright, he didn't even play the frigging organ! Not only is the stage show fantastic becausr it feels like you're actually there but it 's the passion and the wonderful atmosphere.
boffinme80 1 year ago
@boffinme80 It was a disappointment because your comparing it. Theater and Hollywood are completely different mediums each with their own advantages. Theater's being your actually there and in awe at your suroundings. Hollywood's being the ability to add effects in post production which are not possible, or safe, to do witha live audience. I have not seen the bradoway show, but I want to. I found this movie amazing regardless. Theater and Hollywood should never be compared.
LordDarcia 4 months ago in playlist LordDarcia's Favorited Videos
@LordDarcia It's not because I'm comparing it. It was just a disappointment overall. The singing, the acting and they even changed it in some ways as well. Like Point of No Return for example and the rooftop scene.
boffinme80 4 months ago
I really love 1:06 :D
JMD11523 1 year ago
Whoever gave this song a bad rating, you don't know sick 'em.
GuyverFan95 1 year ago
Yes, I agree it seems more reasonable that it would be Meg rather than her mother, but as far as the dates go, remember that much of the movie was re-written compared to the stage show (too bad), and in the original production, the auction takes place in 1905, and the overture takes you back to 1881, NOT 1870 like in the movie....
Chrisrex83 2 years ago
in my playbill from broadway It is OLD MEG GIRY
LarissaLovesEmo 2 years ago
Yea I agree. It's also pretty obvious it's Meg.
From the time period of 1870 to 1919. The Madame is dead.
And it's Meg anyway due to the Giry part.
And she remains unmarried, making her Madame Giry.
LatasianDevil 2 years ago 2
no it wouldnt, it would make her mademoiselle Giry. In english, she was called Mrs Giry, not miss Giry.
But do we really need to question it, its something the director did wrong. The movie was set in 1871, and yet he ignores that France was at war at that time. Additionally, hes the guy that put nipples on the batsuit.
thattaityguy 2 years ago
Well, fromt he English version, we can tell she's married. But if she wasn't she would still be Madame Giry.
She would be Mademoiselle Giry at her younger years. But it would be automatic French ettiquette to refer to an old umarried woman as Madame.
You wouldn't walk to up to an old woman and call her mademoiselle unless you're an old man trying to flirt with her.
And you're right about the 1871
TheKoKoRee 2 years ago
one point to add - if the auctioneer knew her last name, odds are he knew her marital status
But lets do some simple maths
Christine was 16 in 1871 - born 1855. Presumably giry jnr was the same age. Raoul would have been 5 years older - born 1850. If Giry snr was 17 when she had meg, she'd have been born 1833.
If in theory you went by Giry snr would be 86, giry jnr would be 69. It could still plausibly be the mother
Either way - Joel Schumaker put nipples on the batsuit
thattaityguy 2 years ago 2
MY FAVORITE SONG!!!!
jpan1959 2 years ago 3
See the show.
It's SOOOO much better.
It took my breath away.
MATTandMUSIC 2 years ago 12
So true. Film is good for fans to be able to watch it wheneve rbut it doesn't even touch the live show!!
sangel222returns 2 years ago
@MATTandMUSIC saaaame i've seen the us tour that's running right now (tim martin gleason as phantom) 3 times and ohhhh my goodness every time during overture my jaw was either on the floor or i was smiling like a kid at christmas
Lolo237237 1 year ago
I am only assuming that the old woman is Meg Giry because Madame Giry is Looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong dead right??
PerfectSnake1 2 years ago
It is Madame Giry. I think it be more beleavable if it were Meg.
sacramouche 2 years ago
It is Meg.
Raoul is soooo old and the same age as Meg.
It wouldn't make sense if it were Madame Giry.
MATTandMUSIC 2 years ago
It clearly states in the scene that it's Madame Giry & not Meg Giry It's the same actor playing old/young Madame Giry.
I don't thik was greatest idea. It should be Meg Giry. She always goes by that name.
sacramouche 2 years ago
It IS Meg!!
They call her Madame because she is OLDER!!
Duh!!
MATTandMUSIC 2 years ago
It's Madame Giry in the play too though.
TheStrangerDied 2 years ago
It has to be madame giry - if meg had married shed have a different surname
thattaityguy 2 years ago
Maybe she didn't marry.
Madame Giry is WAAYY older than Raoul, Christine, and Meg, so that's just logically not true.
MATTandMUSIC 2 years ago
well... but in the book she did... xS
RitaC4 2 years ago
This is the only thing the film did fanstically well.
Seele1 2 years ago
I like Point Of No Return & their exit through the trap door, through the fire.
sacramouche 2 years ago
Yes, the stage version is so much better than the movie. They changed quite a bit for the movie version...ie: the lack of the thumping bass when he's beckoning Christine to the mirror; the very chinsey red death costume in Masquerade...just to name a couple.
You haven't experienced Phantom 'till you've seen it on stage
Chrisrex83 2 years ago
i saw dis yesterday and thye stagew version is so better
dolphinboy13204 3 years ago
the stage show is SO much better...but this song is fun to play on the keyboard X)
funkylilmunkey5 3 years ago
man i REALLY REALLY wanna see the stage version!!!! my mom and sister saw it a long time ago but i culdnt cuz i wuz too young...);
allerdycegirl 3 years ago
IT IS UNBELIEVABLE. SERIOUSLY, it will make you cry like a baby! It's sooo moving and it will actually give you the shivers. I honestly could cry thinking about it (is that pathetic) it's just so wonderful.
sangel222returns 3 years ago
"Sangel222return" its totally normal(i think) to shiver just to think about it. Its brilliant.
CharmedBalthazar 2 years ago
I still love the phantom of the opera.. i need to see it again before the Australian season finishes =\
d3fyinggr4vity 3 years ago
I was actually disappointed in alot of the movie including this part--compared to the stage version, the opening chords of the overture in the movie are fairly weak...also, I don't really like the extension on the end. My opinion is, if you want to truely experience the magic of Phantom, see the stage show, NOT the movie.
Chrisrex83 3 years ago
Well, I'm sure that everybody who has seen this show would surely rather see the stage show, but for people who can't afford it or are incapable of going for one reason or the other, this is the next best thing.
wickedistheshiz 3 years ago
Yes, I agree the stage show is ten times better but I thought they didn't do a half bad job of the overture/prologue. However it will of course never match the stage show. I was like in total awe during the whole opening, I thought, "this cannot get any better" it just seemed to feed my every desire (if that sounds nuts) but it really is that moving and emotional.
sangel222returns 3 years ago
i saw this on broadway and this scene was amazing. when they pulled the chandelier up sparks were flying out of it and the music started getting load and...it was just. WOW
masterfrofro 3 years ago
aww i seen it 2 years ago wen iwas 12 and
we were late and missed tha part
we were walking into the lobby as it was playing was
RandomlyContagious 3 years ago
I saw this in a small theatre the first day it came out, never seen it didn't know what to expect. The organ starts, I got surround sound around me and my heart starts pounding with the music. Whooo! Thats how to watch this flick
EverythingAustin 3 years ago
1:45, with the bass notes D= goosepimples....
j0sheydude 3 years ago
o you Europeans :P
just kiddin
enobnala90 3 years ago
silence :P
j0sheydude 3 years ago
hehehehehehehehehehe
he
enobnala90 3 years ago
one of my favorite parts in the movie<3
TwilightPrincess1001 3 years ago
the the chandelier rising, it gives me goosepimples...
j0sheydude 3 years ago
at 3:09, what's with all the guys in the room full of white powder? What are they doing?
SalohcinSilverwing 3 years ago
I think these are stonecutters / stonemasons
Biest 3 years ago
hmm, that makes sense. I honestly had no idea what they were doing with all that white powder...
SalohcinSilverwing 3 years ago
I think that pouder comes from the stones they´re work on;-)
Biest 3 years ago
drug lab :D
EverythingAustin 3 years ago
Love this scene XD It's fantastic on stage and very well done in the movie too!
ScarletHarlotry 3 years ago
in the stage production, this scared the hell out of me
erotefmenos 3 years ago 3
and me, i was not expecting that, (i had not seen the moive at that time) :P
j0sheydude 3 years ago
Yeah same =D It was REALLY dramatic and absolutely amazing. The whole thing was absolutely BRILLIANT.
When the Phantom hanged the guy, I jumped in my seat
darknova7000 3 years ago
the auctioneer isnt creepy enough
songmakegohaha 3 years ago
ive been lookiing for this for ages. thanx
masterfrofro 3 years ago