As for the high cost of healthcare, why is it never mentioned, the extremely high salaries of an industry that is supposed to care about people? Why is it never mentioned the source of high costs sprouting from technology, research, drugs, equipment, etc? Why is the source of the high costs to the end user never on the defensive? The first thing we criticize is the insureance industy. Does insureance actually drive up costs as a middleman redistributing your money, or is is just expensive?
@quicksiliva The bureaucracy creates costs by wasting time and employing three people for a job that takes one. My primary concern is the role private industry plays in our government. I hate lobbyists and the way money buys politicians, who sell out constituents for kickbacks - when the lines between corporations and government get blurred, you have yourself fascism. So when Obama and Nancy Pelosi sell out the country to the same greedy bastards who caused the problem, they give them authority.
@kylematthewdiduck How much more would it really cost over the current costs? For one, I don't believe that government runs programs more wastefully and inefficiently than the private sector. Having worked in both, I just don't see the big difference. As for private industry invading government... It's a done deal. It's been this way for how many decades now? I think that the US is fascist and has been for a long time, but not because of one party... Republicans are just as bad.
@quicksiliva The fascism is due to the two party establishment, not either party (as you said). That's why I automatically reject government plans that invest billions (in the case of healthcare, TRILLIONS) in companies who normally have no authority over individuals, thus giving them significant authority. In terms of specific cost, let's see...the start-up bill passed earlier this year is worth over one trillion dollars in the first year. How is that possible unless they're being inefficient?
@kylematthewdiduck What you're forgetting and not mentioning is the source of high healthcare costs which end up costing the consumer no matter where the insurance comes from. The current system of insurance companies competing doesn't work.. It doesn't make it affordable. And I don't have a problem with gov competing with the private sector. To me, the bottom line is end user costs, even if that meant everyone contributing to the cost.
@quicksiliva Of course there are costs, but when there are more companies competing, one can choose the best value for the best service FOR THEM. They aren't legally obligated to pay a certain rate, for a minimum service, with the threat of fines/jail, as the health care bill says. Another point to make, though, is the long-term costs of inflating the dollar with inefficient, arbitrary spending (ie. trillions for health care), which are irreversible costs...not to mention inherent corruption.
@kylematthewdiduck But collectively insurence doesn't vary all that much and it's very much like a monopoly on the American people. Some people don't have a choice because their jobs don't offer low cost insureance. When you have a necessity like healthcare, which is the same as water, it can be prices at whatever they want to price it at and a few dollars difference between companies is like a few cents difference between gas stations. The freedom of choice here is all an illusion.
@quicksiliva So what do you think happens when that already small amount of choice is eliminated because every is legally required to pay into a corrupt and bureaucratic system? Do you think the amount of choice goes up or down? And when the government gives PRIVATE companies a mandate that requires supposedly free citizens to purchase a product from that company, do you think that is an increase or decrease in liberty?
@kylematthewdiduck Ok,, you've fallen into the "Freedom" bullshit that they feed you. Tell me what is the difference when corporations control your life instead of Government? Why do you think that even though the government program would probably cost individuals less since everyone is paying into it, that the corporations are fighting tooth and nail against a national plan? Because it will put them out of business. Right now they control your life, your spending, and how is that better?
@quicksiliva You know what kinds of choices we have that you are so adamant about protecting? Burger King or McDonnalds... Now that's a choice. Insurance companies rape people blind, because the medical industry can't control it huge costs. You have the middle man whether it's a company or the gov.... There are going to be administrative costs, red tape, but that goes anytime there is a middle man. How about we get rid of insurance companies and offer what is reasonalbe and affordable?
@quicksiliva Put them out of business?? It's guaranteed them business (through law) forever. The reason I trust a market of corporations over the government is because corporations don't have any inherent authority over me or anyone. Government does. How in the hell does a nationally-run health care plan put insurance companies out of business? They still provide the service, but now they have the government authority to administer to everyone, instead of having to compete.
I was saying that if anyone believes in teamwork, forget about throwing your dollars at professional millionaires to throw a ball around... Pay for you fellow man, the real working man to have his health. All I hear is cost, and the cost of health should be far far more important than what everyone is already spending their money on.... JUNK. Forget my opinion though... Jesus supports FREE healthcare, and if you're a Christian, I suggest you read what Jesus tells us to do.
"the gay one" Mark Levin is just JEALOUS that Olbermann, and Garafalo for that matter, are INFINITELY more relevant than a schmuck like Levin will ever be! Olbermann is on PRIME TIME TV, and "the gay one" is on LATE NIGHT AM radio.
MSLSD? LOL Maybe if "the gay one" tried LSD his puny little mind would be opened to all of the wonderful things this universe has to offer, and then he wouldn't be such a miserable little TROLL!
@theMETALDOVE Listen to dumbshit levin sling insults because he's a moron. This guy has not one credible argument against any one that he bashes. He calls people names and you want intelligent people to believe that his viewers are smart well educated people? I'd say the big difference is that Levin draws 5 million morons, while Kieth draws 1 million half educated intellectuals.
@okplayer420 You only reinforce what Mark Levin is pointing out. That you radical liberals who listen to and believe what Keith Overbite says are morons. You're drones and you know it.
You're defense? "The gay one". WOW, hope and change huh moron?
I hate liberals. Firstly, they assume that all conservatives are stupid, going so far as to say that we don't know what the Boston Tea Party was.
Secondly, they use racism as a way to vilify us. According to them, all right-wingers are racist, and everyone who opposses Obama is necessarily racist as well.
It's simply not possible that they're upset with him because they'll burdened with debt for years to come because of his economic policies!
i've heard that as many as half of all states are needs bankruptcy due to the benefits to state employees---like n.j. pay $120,000 into pension get back 2.4 million in benefits
i just don't like the way bush has been demonized and demonized isn't an overstatement. his biggest problem--reaching across the aisle. immingration, stimulus ($250 check), tarp, medicare RX. candidate obama is bush. tax and spend, across the aisle blah blah
the actual living and breathing and lying obama---i don't think there is a comparison with another. he operates on a whole different plane of detestable men of us history.
@Grendo147 The reason why I called you a retard, is because when the facts are out there, republicans refuse to accept them. This is a FACT: That recession did not start until after Bush took office. National Bureau of Economic Research declared it started March 2001 and ended Nov 2001. Republicans can NEVER admit they're wrong about anything, another example would be the Iraq War. Are you really that ignorant and bias, old man?
@Grendo147 Recession? Are you serious, Clinton did not leave with a recession. This is why you right winged retards are the minority in the congress, you make stuff up. Clinton left a surplus, that your Republican could not handle, and left this huge mess. Bush had 8 years and ruined this country, you know your wrong when Fox News Bill O'Reilly even says you cant blame Clinton, and they hate him.
why do you think it is okay to disrespect and steal from someone just because they are wealthy? why? what do they owe you? if the fed govt (bush included) wants to play nanny they can use there own money.
a tax cut means everybody has more money, that's a good thing. kennedy cut taxes across the board. major cuts and naturally the economy boomed.
reagan did the same thing, taxes cut across the board. 20 million jobs and the economy grew 8 trillion.
@theMETALDOVE Its funny you said that because Reagan also left a deficit! If you hadnt noticed, we owe China a crapload of money, where do you expect the government to get the money??? It's called that people! It's not disrespect for goodness sake, you would have died when taxes were 90% in the earlier 1900's yet you claim it's disrespect at 35%
yes, reagan did leave a deficit--but he established the us as the lone superpower with a military unparalleled in history. the ussr had collapsed, and freedom was breaking out all over europe. to which you will say that reagan had nothing to do with that. i know. but this is to ignore history. read what the KGB had to say--reagan scared the shit out of them. what the poles have to say---there are streets in poland named after reagan.
@theMETALDOVE Reagan also helped bring down the Unions in America, which Im sure you loved. That was a disgraceful thing to do, actually hurt your American people. You cant use Reagans tactics now, Bush tried, and now Obama has to repair our image with the world. Also, Reagan had the Iran Contra Affair Republicans like to sweep under the rug
@Grendo147 Im wrong? You tell me how many jobs the Bush tax cuts created. And dont even bring Clinton up, he wasnt in office for 8 years while this happend, even Fox's Bill O'Reilly admits that.
how in the world did you get so arrogant when you made it clear in your profile that you were just learning about politics. you don't want to talk or hear different perspectives you want to play politics.
democrats good. republicans bad. and as tedious as that it is--- you don't even know what you are talking about. not saying that to be insulting, it is the truth. do you talk to people at work like you do on here? i hope not.
@theMETALDOVE When did I say republicans bad, DEMS good? You made that up in your pea brain. I look at all the news on TV and make judgements, FOX, CNN , and MSNBC. I think there is a reason why Reps are the minority in government, because the American people doesnt trust them! And I havnet updated my profile for a looooong time. Your just a Rush Limbaugh mouthpiece. I like disent, when it is logical and not partisan. You have yet to be bi-partisan. You think a 35% tax rate is disresspect
@Grendo147 And how do they contribute to the economy and job creation? This is the top 1% of Americans, and obviously the Bush Tax cuts which helped the rich, didnt HELP THE ECONOMY. Where were the job creations with that tax cuts? They are doing this to make him look bad, Im glad Scott Brown actually had some balls and sided with the Dems, thats bi-partisianship. And compare how many Reps supported the Bush bailout to Obamas, that is being bias.
bush tax cuts were ACROSS THE BOARD all income levels. it is a fact--
do you believe the wealthy don't pay their "fare share" is that why you object to them being helped? for starters the top 1% income earners (super wealthy) they pay 30% of all taxes in this country. 1% is paying 30% of the bill. the top 5% pays for more then half of all taxes collected. does that sound fair?
@theMETALDOVE Really 5 million jobs huh? Then why did he have a net loss of jobs while he was in office? The top 5% make more money then the better 50%, does that sound fair? They complain about paying extra, like it will really affect their millionaire lifestyle. And if you dont think that the wealthy benefited more from the Bush tax cuts then the middle class, I will stop responding because you're helpless
you can stop commenting anytime you want. that is such a bizarre threat and here we go again with the nonsense figures that you don't like to site or explain--you know what, i think i'll stop responding. make the "bureau of labor and statistics" web site your friend. it's a lot more credible then bill oreilly ramblings or left wing blogs. no mas, no mas.
you are a nut and my dog needs to pee. we can talk about iran contra, clarence thomas, nicaragua, mx missles, i don't mind being challenged. i don't mind that much being proven wrong, but i am not a fucking gop spokesperson. i can tell you what i think or what i know, but no more press conferences. lindsay graham likes doing that shit, talk to him.
ps i don't give 2 shits about a perfect image of any child, people are not perfect. give me the imperfect truth any day.
Where were these teabaggers for the past 8 years under Bush? Bush spend tons of money, but yet no tea parties. Hmmm sounds like a bunch of whiny little republicans who hate the fact that DEMS are in office now.
actually the tea parties started at the end of bush's time.
i know that liberal dems think this way, but not everything in life is politics. do you approve of this president or any president spending money that your children have yet to earn? do you want your children to enjoy a standard of living at least equal to yours...because that will soon be an impossibility. how much do you pay in taxes overall? is it too much? would you like to pay more? because you will.
I dont believe the tea parties started at the end of Bushs time, I dont remember hearing anything or Fox covering them, show me where Fox covered those. I believe Obama is trying to be Bipartisian, but Republicans only say no to embarrass him. I am 23 yrs old and think if we owe a ton of money to china, then you have to pay taxes in order to bring the debt down. I dont make over 250K so I dont have to worry, and if you make over 250K neither do you, cuz you still will live comfortably.
NO WAY did you say Obama is trying to be bi-partisan. With closed door health care bills and shit? Tea Parties started exactly after the banker bailout under that other idiotic president Bush. The reasons republicans say no, to the the new; jobs bill (stimulus 2), cap and trade (fake global warming tax), and health care (witch would run us into even more debt to be bought up by china). is because any REAL republican or sensible person knows we cannot afford all these b/s programs right now.
Closed health care bills? He's having an open meeting with Republicans TODAY! You have no credibility after that statement. Thats funny, Republicans supported Bush's bailout but wont support Obamas. And how can you say "fake global warming" when your Republican Presidential Candidate John McCain says there is, and even Fox's Bill O'Reilly says theres global warming!
yeah, TODAY! not months ago haha! i bet i could find a video of where the conferences were going on for the health care bill, where the media wasn't even allowed in, because of closed doors, that no republicans were invited to. When the hell did bill say he believed in it? John McCain is a liberal republican so i couldn't give a shit, and have you been oblivious to the news? this is the coldest winter recorded, and months ago, someone hacked the head scientist behind global warmings email
Look it up, Bill O'Reilly global warming, he calls people who dont believe in it Right Winged idiots. Seriously, you need a clue. A liberal Republican was the best your party could produce! So much for conservatism
the video of bill oreilly making an ass out of himself? that's every night. you do know, however, that there is no "global warming". there may be "global cooling", but there is definetly "climate change". it has nothing to do with us though.
the united states used to be an ice cube. what happened? global warming.
@theMETALDOVE I would hope you know that global warming, refers, to more then the United States. While it might snow here, it's burning up somewhere else, and the earth is still getting hotter overall. Your republican candidate John McCain even said there was
mccain is a fearless warrior, but an inept, ill informed, weak kneed politician.
as for global warming--no thanks to the u.s press, guess you are unaware that, amongst other things, professor phil jones (al gore's global warming guru) has admitted that there has been no warming since 95 and that it has been plenty warmer in the past and it had nothing to do with man.
whispers of charging him with fraud and a possible 10 years in prison can be heard.
@theMETALDOVE Guess you are unaware that the National Science Association says there is global warming. And you and Fox are in the businesss of starting rumors, if he isnt charged with fraud then you are an idiot and cant be taken seriously. So when can we expect him to be charged?
people and organizations that have earned or invested billions are not so inclined to believe what is happening.
you have an opportunity to witness the greatest scam in world history come apart. i'm not working for anybody, this is really happening. the fraud charges are just being talked about right now. LONDON DAILY MAIL feb 15.
i was going to send you some links but there are thousands. just start to google, it's not a trick, i am simply trying to tell you.
GODDAMN i hate libs if over the next 3 years every criticism of barry is racist we will not another black president republican or democrat for at least 20 years
@quicksiliva ?? Then how come I found your response to be completely mindless. Are you really as moronic as Janeane Garafalo was in this video? You're in lock-step with her beliefs; her unfounded, race-baiting beliefs?
@kylematthewdiduck The reason you found my response mindless is because my intellect is far superior to your lack of intellect. Perhaps I should speak redneck? Maybe then you would understand. Janeane is not a moron. The reason you think she is, is because you're the brainwashed moron, and you're a racist. Of course you are... You don't have intelligent arguments for what you speak.
@quicksiliva Well, let's see. You start with a redundant statement. Then you put a question mark behind a sentence that isn't a question. You're off to a great start.
But if arguments are what you're concerned about, let's try this: Janeane is a moron because she, like other under-educated progressive sheep, think that any critical statement about a black person is racist. Why is that? Is it perhaps because she's racist? "Gee, don't insult the poor black man. He can't take it." Dumbass.
@kylematthewdiduck Wrong Idiot. You don't get to use reverse racism simply because Levin and you have already proven yourselves racists. There you go again making assaulting jabs with no meaning, and you wonder why people consider you racist? You and Levin and most conservatards are racists because they don't have credible arguments against the black president. They call him a socialist, a communist, every word in the book that doesn't really apply, and it's all a cover for "Nigger".
so the fact that the president with the marxist upbringing who claims to have sought out the guidance of all the best marxist professors in college, who endorses probably more then half of the 10 planks of marxism, the president that likes to "spread the wealth around", forever uses class warfare and seeks a command and control economy---to call such a president a marxist or a socialist is actually racist....care to explain yourself, at all?
@theMETALDOVE Where do you come up with this shit? Marxist? You people are wacked out of your mind. Every president spreads wealth around. It's called social security, welfare, medicare, military, post office... etc.. And the list keeps going, and it goes the same where there is a republican in the oval office as well. You try hard to single him out with your brainwashed Micheal Savage, Levin, and Fox news bullshit, and you want me to explain to you just how batshit crazy you are?
@kylematthewdiduck Ha, Jeneane is right on the money... And it's funny how pissed off Levin is. He's pissed because she's right. The underlying theme is stupid rednecks who know nothing about actualy history, know nothing about the original tea party, going to these mass gatherings shouting things they don't even understand, and these are the people that make up Levin's customer base. Of course he's going to immaturely throw nasty insults at his opposition because he needs your money!
@quicksiliva The tea party, very generally, protested taxation without representation. In the same regard, the modern tea-partiers are protesting the way in which government spends ridiculously (yes, trillions upon trillions) while providing no tangible benefit to those being taxed. Further, Obama sold out the country and its people to monopolize health insurance, privatize much of the auto industry, and has demonstrated his unflinching servitude to the military-industrial complex Israel's lobby
@quicksiliva The tea party, very generally, protested taxation without representation. In the same regard, the modern tea-partiers are protesting the way in which government spends ridiculously (yes, trillions upon trillions) while providing no tangible benefit to those being taxed. Further, Obama sold out the country and its people to monopolize health insurance, privatize much of the auto industry, and has demonstrated his unflinching servitude to the military-industrial complex+Israel's lobby
@kylematthewdiduck From what you just said, the current tea party is wrong! They are represented, and they are taxed. Good, they need to monopolize health insureance... It's too God damn expensive as it is. Have you seen the insurance payout on top of your co-pay on an invoice? I paid $20 while the insurance paid $180 for a man to hold a stethescope up to my chest and tell me that I am sick. What's wrong with that picture? Instead of blaming the med industry, who do you blame?
@quicksiliva They aren't represented when their tax dollars are used for things harmful to them or the country. To continue our health example, monopolizing the healthcare industry with a governmental MANDATE doesn't lower costs-it increases costs by lowering efficiency and increasing bureaucracy. If you hated a free market before, wait until the biggest players in the free market have guaranteed, INVOLUNTARY business from the whole country...
@kylematthewdiduck But they are still represented. The whole idea of representation is stupid anyway. You're not going to represent everyone by electing one person, one person who is fallable and can change his mind at the drop of a hat, or a bribe. It's crap that people think this is the best system. As for healthcare, it needs to be universal medicare. I don't care if it costs more. IT's HEALTH, your health and my health, and if anyone believes in teamwork,
@theMETALDOVE You should say the same thing to everyone else who has yet to comment one coherent thought free of insult. Not one person has done so yet.
what do i owe for your sanctimonious irrelevance?
your use of redneck as a pejorative is interesting considering your affinity for the king of rock-a-billy himself jerry lee lewis. now he, HE is a red neck.
do you think jerry lee would petition the federal government for an overpriced state run insurance plan financed by the chinese?
i have no problm w rednecks. i'd be a redneck if i knew how to fix a car. i'm a 5th generation virginian from the Shenandoah Valley. i buzz my own hair and hem my pants with a staple a gun.
im huge fan of jerry lee. the king of rockabilly. did you not see that i was questioning the the person of the comment as to why he used redneck as an insult?
"closed minded"becuz we dont want the currency to colapse and the nation to go bankrupt?!
Well, anyone with "coon" in their screen name, is not going to be an ass kissing, pansy, pandering libfag, that's for damn sure. Now, the pansy lib media, and you other name calling libtards have branded "teabaggers" as rednecks, and racists. The truth is, they are patriotic citizens, who pay taxes, obey the laws, and stand up for their freedom. Unfortunately they are standing up for your freedom as well, even though you would rather have the government support you. Power in 2010!!!!
But it's good you at least admit Olbermann has an influence in the media.
It just angers me to see about half a million Republicans calling Olbermann "insignificant" though the previous vice president and the guy running for president last year went after him.
Levin is successful, but I still believe Olbermann has a bigger influence than he does. He gets more ratings because radios are much more portable than televisions and cheaper and don't need cable and such.
Funny Lemons mentions ratings. If you look up "Mark Levin" on the search, you get 2770 results. "Keith Olbermann"? 13500. Haha, Countdown to irrelevance is Mark's little radio show.
Levin needs to shut the fuck up and stop calling the kettle black. He's an irrelevant, insignificant, incapable and unintelligent right wing prick who can only insult people based on sex appeal (though Keith, a 50 year old man, has a 25 year old girlfriend, even sadder, Lemons).
has sold 1,000,ooo,000 copiea of liberty ans tyranny
and has two previous best sellers
this started when olbermann belittled levin's leagle foundation on his msnbc show
levin ranted on air then begain receiving calls and emails from others,like dates, who spilled the beans on olbermann
levin is EXTREMELY competitive. i really dont like olbermann, but he's obviously had a nice carreer and makes a fortune, it;s being said that he is a super %
Can you spell that right, please? I can't understand that completely.
But anyway, there's no evidence that any of these people really dated Olbermann and there's no way to verify their stories. Discussing matters like this on radio is also despicable and shows what a pathetic debater and source of information Levin is.
And it's clear that radio shows have a higher audience capability. If Keith put his show on radio as well as television, his audience would probably double.
i do speak the truth...indeed i do. you should be proud that you saw the truth, but i am sttill better for speaking the truth. for there is no truth without thee truth. thank me very much.
nietzche is the preferred philosopher of the pseudo intellectual...not only is he good for a sound bite...but liberals share in his nihilistic view of humanity...or something like that
i'm guessing that by the name you're somewhat of a hippie. maybe pseudo intellectual who likes to trash sarah palin over a scone at the starbucks. quote neitzche and use words like sheeple?
may i ask your age...i'm conducting a survey. it;s okay, just relax i. work for the govenment.
Mark is awsome
BallisticWic 2 weeks ago
Garofalo, Olberman and Levin are all morons.
jme6141994 1 month ago
Mark Levin is a scholar.
mjn76 11 months ago
Garofalo is not very self-aware apparently. While she slanders millions of people of racism, it's clear that she is much more venomous.
mjn76 11 months ago
As for the high cost of healthcare, why is it never mentioned, the extremely high salaries of an industry that is supposed to care about people? Why is it never mentioned the source of high costs sprouting from technology, research, drugs, equipment, etc? Why is the source of the high costs to the end user never on the defensive? The first thing we criticize is the insureance industy. Does insureance actually drive up costs as a middleman redistributing your money, or is is just expensive?
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva The bureaucracy creates costs by wasting time and employing three people for a job that takes one. My primary concern is the role private industry plays in our government. I hate lobbyists and the way money buys politicians, who sell out constituents for kickbacks - when the lines between corporations and government get blurred, you have yourself fascism. So when Obama and Nancy Pelosi sell out the country to the same greedy bastards who caused the problem, they give them authority.
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck How much more would it really cost over the current costs? For one, I don't believe that government runs programs more wastefully and inefficiently than the private sector. Having worked in both, I just don't see the big difference. As for private industry invading government... It's a done deal. It's been this way for how many decades now? I think that the US is fascist and has been for a long time, but not because of one party... Republicans are just as bad.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva The fascism is due to the two party establishment, not either party (as you said). That's why I automatically reject government plans that invest billions (in the case of healthcare, TRILLIONS) in companies who normally have no authority over individuals, thus giving them significant authority. In terms of specific cost, let's see...the start-up bill passed earlier this year is worth over one trillion dollars in the first year. How is that possible unless they're being inefficient?
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck What you're forgetting and not mentioning is the source of high healthcare costs which end up costing the consumer no matter where the insurance comes from. The current system of insurance companies competing doesn't work.. It doesn't make it affordable. And I don't have a problem with gov competing with the private sector. To me, the bottom line is end user costs, even if that meant everyone contributing to the cost.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva Of course there are costs, but when there are more companies competing, one can choose the best value for the best service FOR THEM. They aren't legally obligated to pay a certain rate, for a minimum service, with the threat of fines/jail, as the health care bill says. Another point to make, though, is the long-term costs of inflating the dollar with inefficient, arbitrary spending (ie. trillions for health care), which are irreversible costs...not to mention inherent corruption.
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck But collectively insurence doesn't vary all that much and it's very much like a monopoly on the American people. Some people don't have a choice because their jobs don't offer low cost insureance. When you have a necessity like healthcare, which is the same as water, it can be prices at whatever they want to price it at and a few dollars difference between companies is like a few cents difference between gas stations. The freedom of choice here is all an illusion.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva So what do you think happens when that already small amount of choice is eliminated because every is legally required to pay into a corrupt and bureaucratic system? Do you think the amount of choice goes up or down? And when the government gives PRIVATE companies a mandate that requires supposedly free citizens to purchase a product from that company, do you think that is an increase or decrease in liberty?
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck Ok,, you've fallen into the "Freedom" bullshit that they feed you. Tell me what is the difference when corporations control your life instead of Government? Why do you think that even though the government program would probably cost individuals less since everyone is paying into it, that the corporations are fighting tooth and nail against a national plan? Because it will put them out of business. Right now they control your life, your spending, and how is that better?
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva You know what kinds of choices we have that you are so adamant about protecting? Burger King or McDonnalds... Now that's a choice. Insurance companies rape people blind, because the medical industry can't control it huge costs. You have the middle man whether it's a company or the gov.... There are going to be administrative costs, red tape, but that goes anytime there is a middle man. How about we get rid of insurance companies and offer what is reasonalbe and affordable?
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva Put them out of business?? It's guaranteed them business (through law) forever. The reason I trust a market of corporations over the government is because corporations don't have any inherent authority over me or anyone. Government does. How in the hell does a nationally-run health care plan put insurance companies out of business? They still provide the service, but now they have the government authority to administer to everyone, instead of having to compete.
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
I was saying that if anyone believes in teamwork, forget about throwing your dollars at professional millionaires to throw a ball around... Pay for you fellow man, the real working man to have his health. All I hear is cost, and the cost of health should be far far more important than what everyone is already spending their money on.... JUNK. Forget my opinion though... Jesus supports FREE healthcare, and if you're a Christian, I suggest you read what Jesus tells us to do.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
keith overbite countdown to no ratings is cancelled taken off the air while The Great One consistently is number 1 on evening radio.
liberals really are retarded
MrRepublicanpatriot 1 year ago
@MrAmericanFirst Fox an d Friends in the morning beats Overbite.
salt27dogg 1 year ago
the great one!!!!!!! Mark Levin is the greatist talk show of all time!!!!
MrRepublicanpatriot 1 year ago
@MrAmericanFirst
less then one million viewers? who even pays his salary? i dont get it?
theMETALDOVE 1 year ago
@theMETALDOVE Olberwoman only averages about 700,000 viewers...
TheMadMusicMan 1 year ago
Well I guess liberalism really is a mental disorder.
sexycarln 1 year ago
"the gay one" Mark Levin is just JEALOUS that Olbermann, and Garafalo for that matter, are INFINITELY more relevant than a schmuck like Levin will ever be! Olbermann is on PRIME TIME TV, and "the gay one" is on LATE NIGHT AM radio.
MSLSD? LOL Maybe if "the gay one" tried LSD his puny little mind would be opened to all of the wonderful things this universe has to offer, and then he wouldn't be such a miserable little TROLL!
okplayer420 1 year ago
@okplayer420
olbermann has 1 million viewers
levin has 5.5 to 7 million listeners
levin's liberty and tyranny sold over 1 million hardback copies and was NY times #1 best seller for 4 months
you're hero is barely literate
just kidding, olbermann has a successful career and is quite rich, but its a mistake to imagine that he's an intellectual.
theMETALDOVE 1 year ago 6
@theMETALDOVE Listen to dumbshit levin sling insults because he's a moron. This guy has not one credible argument against any one that he bashes. He calls people names and you want intelligent people to believe that his viewers are smart well educated people? I'd say the big difference is that Levin draws 5 million morons, while Kieth draws 1 million half educated intellectuals.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@okplayer420 You only reinforce what Mark Levin is pointing out. That you radical liberals who listen to and believe what Keith Overbite says are morons. You're drones and you know it.
You're defense? "The gay one". WOW, hope and change huh moron?
marathon1974 1 year ago
@marathon1974 What a fag your levin is... He's so fucking gay and you are too.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
I hate liberals. Firstly, they assume that all conservatives are stupid, going so far as to say that we don't know what the Boston Tea Party was.
Secondly, they use racism as a way to vilify us. According to them, all right-wingers are racist, and everyone who opposses Obama is necessarily racist as well.
It's simply not possible that they're upset with him because they'll burdened with debt for years to come because of his economic policies!
keicher09 1 year ago 3
Hillarious!
sexycarln 1 year ago
You can tell them anything except the truth and they'll believe it? I'm pretty sure that's the leftists Janine, nice try scumbag
DavidWalkerJr27 1 year ago
@Blockygraphics
i've heard that as many as half of all states are needs bankruptcy due to the benefits to state employees---like n.j. pay $120,000 into pension get back 2.4 million in benefits
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@Grendo147
cont.2
i just don't like the way bush has been demonized and demonized isn't an overstatement. his biggest problem--reaching across the aisle. immingration, stimulus ($250 check), tarp, medicare RX. candidate obama is bush. tax and spend, across the aisle blah blah
the actual living and breathing and lying obama---i don't think there is a comparison with another. he operates on a whole different plane of detestable men of us history.
ps why isn't geitner in f@#*$ prison right now?
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@Grendo147 The reason why I called you a retard, is because when the facts are out there, republicans refuse to accept them. This is a FACT: That recession did not start until after Bush took office. National Bureau of Economic Research declared it started March 2001 and ended Nov 2001. Republicans can NEVER admit they're wrong about anything, another example would be the Iraq War. Are you really that ignorant and bias, old man?
jj3205 2 years ago
@Grendo147 Recession? Are you serious, Clinton did not leave with a recession. This is why you right winged retards are the minority in the congress, you make stuff up. Clinton left a surplus, that your Republican could not handle, and left this huge mess. Bush had 8 years and ruined this country, you know your wrong when Fox News Bill O'Reilly even says you cant blame Clinton, and they hate him.
jj3205 2 years ago
@Grendo147 Do you realize the top 3% makes more then the bottom 50%? How many jobs did the top 1% create with the Bush tax cuts?
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
why do you think it is okay to disrespect and steal from someone just because they are wealthy? why? what do they owe you? if the fed govt (bush included) wants to play nanny they can use there own money.
a tax cut means everybody has more money, that's a good thing. kennedy cut taxes across the board. major cuts and naturally the economy boomed.
reagan did the same thing, taxes cut across the board. 20 million jobs and the economy grew 8 trillion.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@theMETALDOVE Its funny you said that because Reagan also left a deficit! If you hadnt noticed, we owe China a crapload of money, where do you expect the government to get the money??? It's called that people! It's not disrespect for goodness sake, you would have died when taxes were 90% in the earlier 1900's yet you claim it's disrespect at 35%
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
yes, reagan did leave a deficit--but he established the us as the lone superpower with a military unparalleled in history. the ussr had collapsed, and freedom was breaking out all over europe. to which you will say that reagan had nothing to do with that. i know. but this is to ignore history. read what the KGB had to say--reagan scared the shit out of them. what the poles have to say---there are streets in poland named after reagan.
taxes--90%/35% cont.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@theMETALDOVE Reagan also helped bring down the Unions in America, which Im sure you loved. That was a disgraceful thing to do, actually hurt your American people. You cant use Reagans tactics now, Bush tried, and now Obama has to repair our image with the world. Also, Reagan had the Iran Contra Affair Republicans like to sweep under the rug
jj3205 2 years ago
@Grendo147 Im wrong? You tell me how many jobs the Bush tax cuts created. And dont even bring Clinton up, he wasnt in office for 8 years while this happend, even Fox's Bill O'Reilly admits that.
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
how in the world did you get so arrogant when you made it clear in your profile that you were just learning about politics. you don't want to talk or hear different perspectives you want to play politics.
democrats good. republicans bad. and as tedious as that it is--- you don't even know what you are talking about. not saying that to be insulting, it is the truth. do you talk to people at work like you do on here? i hope not.
how is the global warming research coming along?
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@theMETALDOVE When did I say republicans bad, DEMS good? You made that up in your pea brain. I look at all the news on TV and make judgements, FOX, CNN , and MSNBC. I think there is a reason why Reps are the minority in government, because the American people doesnt trust them! And I havnet updated my profile for a looooong time. Your just a Rush Limbaugh mouthpiece. I like disent, when it is logical and not partisan. You have yet to be bi-partisan. You think a 35% tax rate is disresspect
jj3205 2 years ago
@Grendo147 And how do they contribute to the economy and job creation? This is the top 1% of Americans, and obviously the Bush Tax cuts which helped the rich, didnt HELP THE ECONOMY. Where were the job creations with that tax cuts? They are doing this to make him look bad, Im glad Scott Brown actually had some balls and sided with the Dems, thats bi-partisianship. And compare how many Reps supported the Bush bailout to Obamas, that is being bias.
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
bush tax cuts were ACROSS THE BOARD all income levels. it is a fact--
do you believe the wealthy don't pay their "fare share" is that why you object to them being helped? for starters the top 1% income earners (super wealthy) they pay 30% of all taxes in this country. 1% is paying 30% of the bill. the top 5% pays for more then half of all taxes collected. does that sound fair?
how about the bottom 40%? they pay no fed taxes.
bush created 5 million jobs. this is not opinion.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@theMETALDOVE Really 5 million jobs huh? Then why did he have a net loss of jobs while he was in office? The top 5% make more money then the better 50%, does that sound fair? They complain about paying extra, like it will really affect their millionaire lifestyle. And if you dont think that the wealthy benefited more from the Bush tax cuts then the middle class, I will stop responding because you're helpless
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
you can stop commenting anytime you want. that is such a bizarre threat and here we go again with the nonsense figures that you don't like to site or explain--you know what, i think i'll stop responding. make the "bureau of labor and statistics" web site your friend. it's a lot more credible then bill oreilly ramblings or left wing blogs. no mas, no mas.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@theMETALDOVE Just as I thought, dont want to talk about the Iran Contra Affair, it ruins your perfect image of the Republicans poster child.
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
you are a nut and my dog needs to pee. we can talk about iran contra, clarence thomas, nicaragua, mx missles, i don't mind being challenged. i don't mind that much being proven wrong, but i am not a fucking gop spokesperson. i can tell you what i think or what i know, but no more press conferences. lindsay graham likes doing that shit, talk to him.
ps i don't give 2 shits about a perfect image of any child, people are not perfect. give me the imperfect truth any day.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
Where were these teabaggers for the past 8 years under Bush? Bush spend tons of money, but yet no tea parties. Hmmm sounds like a bunch of whiny little republicans who hate the fact that DEMS are in office now.
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
actually the tea parties started at the end of bush's time.
i know that liberal dems think this way, but not everything in life is politics. do you approve of this president or any president spending money that your children have yet to earn? do you want your children to enjoy a standard of living at least equal to yours...because that will soon be an impossibility. how much do you pay in taxes overall? is it too much? would you like to pay more? because you will.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
I dont believe the tea parties started at the end of Bushs time, I dont remember hearing anything or Fox covering them, show me where Fox covered those. I believe Obama is trying to be Bipartisian, but Republicans only say no to embarrass him. I am 23 yrs old and think if we owe a ton of money to china, then you have to pay taxes in order to bring the debt down. I dont make over 250K so I dont have to worry, and if you make over 250K neither do you, cuz you still will live comfortably.
jj3205 2 years ago
NO WAY did you say Obama is trying to be bi-partisan. With closed door health care bills and shit? Tea Parties started exactly after the banker bailout under that other idiotic president Bush. The reasons republicans say no, to the the new; jobs bill (stimulus 2), cap and trade (fake global warming tax), and health care (witch would run us into even more debt to be bought up by china). is because any REAL republican or sensible person knows we cannot afford all these b/s programs right now.
Yamaha52g 2 years ago
Closed health care bills? He's having an open meeting with Republicans TODAY! You have no credibility after that statement. Thats funny, Republicans supported Bush's bailout but wont support Obamas. And how can you say "fake global warming" when your Republican Presidential Candidate John McCain says there is, and even Fox's Bill O'Reilly says theres global warming!
jj3205 2 years ago
yeah, TODAY! not months ago haha! i bet i could find a video of where the conferences were going on for the health care bill, where the media wasn't even allowed in, because of closed doors, that no republicans were invited to. When the hell did bill say he believed in it? John McCain is a liberal republican so i couldn't give a shit, and have you been oblivious to the news? this is the coldest winter recorded, and months ago, someone hacked the head scientist behind global warmings email
Yamaha52g 2 years ago
, and found out all the b/s to cover up the fact that the last years have been getting colder, by switching numbers around.
Yamaha52g 2 years ago
Look it up, Bill O'Reilly global warming, he calls people who dont believe in it Right Winged idiots. Seriously, you need a clue. A liberal Republican was the best your party could produce! So much for conservatism
jj3205 2 years ago
that is because of corruption in not only democrats but republicans too. That video of bill is old, he has flipped his opinion as of recent.
Yamaha52g 2 years ago
THEN SHOW ME THE VIDEO
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
the video of bill oreilly making an ass out of himself? that's every night. you do know, however, that there is no "global warming". there may be "global cooling", but there is definetly "climate change". it has nothing to do with us though.
the united states used to be an ice cube. what happened? global warming.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@theMETALDOVE I would hope you know that global warming, refers, to more then the United States. While it might snow here, it's burning up somewhere else, and the earth is still getting hotter overall. Your republican candidate John McCain even said there was
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
mccain is a fearless warrior, but an inept, ill informed, weak kneed politician.
as for global warming--no thanks to the u.s press, guess you are unaware that, amongst other things, professor phil jones (al gore's global warming guru) has admitted that there has been no warming since 95 and that it has been plenty warmer in the past and it had nothing to do with man.
whispers of charging him with fraud and a possible 10 years in prison can be heard.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
@theMETALDOVE Guess you are unaware that the National Science Association says there is global warming. And you and Fox are in the businesss of starting rumors, if he isnt charged with fraud then you are an idiot and cant be taken seriously. So when can we expect him to be charged?
jj3205 2 years ago
@jj3205
people and organizations that have earned or invested billions are not so inclined to believe what is happening.
you have an opportunity to witness the greatest scam in world history come apart. i'm not working for anybody, this is really happening. the fraud charges are just being talked about right now. LONDON DAILY MAIL feb 15.
i was going to send you some links but there are thousands. just start to google, it's not a trick, i am simply trying to tell you.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
GODDAMN i hate libs if over the next 3 years every criticism of barry is racist we will not another black president republican or democrat for at least 20 years
TheBrent420 2 years ago
What a dumbass jeneane is...good god.
kylematthewdiduck 2 years ago 7
@kylematthewdiduck What a dumb fuck you are... Kill yourself
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva What a clever reply. You're right up there with Jeneane in terms of rational, accurate responses.
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck you people don't respond to rationality.... I can only attempt to speak on your level to get the message across.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva ?? Then how come I found your response to be completely mindless. Are you really as moronic as Janeane Garafalo was in this video? You're in lock-step with her beliefs; her unfounded, race-baiting beliefs?
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck The reason you found my response mindless is because my intellect is far superior to your lack of intellect. Perhaps I should speak redneck? Maybe then you would understand. Janeane is not a moron. The reason you think she is, is because you're the brainwashed moron, and you're a racist. Of course you are... You don't have intelligent arguments for what you speak.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva Well, let's see. You start with a redundant statement. Then you put a question mark behind a sentence that isn't a question. You're off to a great start.
But if arguments are what you're concerned about, let's try this: Janeane is a moron because she, like other under-educated progressive sheep, think that any critical statement about a black person is racist. Why is that? Is it perhaps because she's racist? "Gee, don't insult the poor black man. He can't take it." Dumbass.
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
Comment removed
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck Wrong Idiot. You don't get to use reverse racism simply because Levin and you have already proven yourselves racists. There you go again making assaulting jabs with no meaning, and you wonder why people consider you racist? You and Levin and most conservatards are racists because they don't have credible arguments against the black president. They call him a socialist, a communist, every word in the book that doesn't really apply, and it's all a cover for "Nigger".
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva
so the fact that the president with the marxist upbringing who claims to have sought out the guidance of all the best marxist professors in college, who endorses probably more then half of the 10 planks of marxism, the president that likes to "spread the wealth around", forever uses class warfare and seeks a command and control economy---to call such a president a marxist or a socialist is actually racist....care to explain yourself, at all?
theMETALDOVE 1 year ago
@theMETALDOVE Where do you come up with this shit? Marxist? You people are wacked out of your mind. Every president spreads wealth around. It's called social security, welfare, medicare, military, post office... etc.. And the list keeps going, and it goes the same where there is a republican in the oval office as well. You try hard to single him out with your brainwashed Micheal Savage, Levin, and Fox news bullshit, and you want me to explain to you just how batshit crazy you are?
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva Are you saying there is no legitimate criticism for President Obama? Really?
Geez, take his take out of your mouth already.
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck Ha, Jeneane is right on the money... And it's funny how pissed off Levin is. He's pissed because she's right. The underlying theme is stupid rednecks who know nothing about actualy history, know nothing about the original tea party, going to these mass gatherings shouting things they don't even understand, and these are the people that make up Levin's customer base. Of course he's going to immaturely throw nasty insults at his opposition because he needs your money!
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva The tea party, very generally, protested taxation without representation. In the same regard, the modern tea-partiers are protesting the way in which government spends ridiculously (yes, trillions upon trillions) while providing no tangible benefit to those being taxed. Further, Obama sold out the country and its people to monopolize health insurance, privatize much of the auto industry, and has demonstrated his unflinching servitude to the military-industrial complex Israel's lobby
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@quicksiliva The tea party, very generally, protested taxation without representation. In the same regard, the modern tea-partiers are protesting the way in which government spends ridiculously (yes, trillions upon trillions) while providing no tangible benefit to those being taxed. Further, Obama sold out the country and its people to monopolize health insurance, privatize much of the auto industry, and has demonstrated his unflinching servitude to the military-industrial complex+Israel's lobby
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck From what you just said, the current tea party is wrong! They are represented, and they are taxed. Good, they need to monopolize health insureance... It's too God damn expensive as it is. Have you seen the insurance payout on top of your co-pay on an invoice? I paid $20 while the insurance paid $180 for a man to hold a stethescope up to my chest and tell me that I am sick. What's wrong with that picture? Instead of blaming the med industry, who do you blame?
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva They aren't represented when their tax dollars are used for things harmful to them or the country. To continue our health example, monopolizing the healthcare industry with a governmental MANDATE doesn't lower costs-it increases costs by lowering efficiency and increasing bureaucracy. If you hated a free market before, wait until the biggest players in the free market have guaranteed, INVOLUNTARY business from the whole country...
kylematthewdiduck 1 year ago
@kylematthewdiduck But they are still represented. The whole idea of representation is stupid anyway. You're not going to represent everyone by electing one person, one person who is fallable and can change his mind at the drop of a hat, or a bribe. It's crap that people think this is the best system. As for healthcare, it needs to be universal medicare. I don't care if it costs more. IT's HEALTH, your health and my health, and if anyone believes in teamwork,
quicksiliva 1 year ago
@quicksiliva
put together one solid, coherent thought--free of insult...i dare you.
theMETALDOVE 1 year ago
@theMETALDOVE You should say the same thing to everyone else who has yet to comment one coherent thought free of insult. Not one person has done so yet.
quicksiliva 1 year ago
teabagging rednecks.
i love it.
beeb1421 2 years ago
what do i owe for your sanctimonious irrelevance?
your use of redneck as a pejorative is interesting considering your affinity for the king of rock-a-billy himself jerry lee lewis. now he, HE is a red neck.
do you think jerry lee would petition the federal government for an overpriced state run insurance plan financed by the chinese?
or
would he be a man and take care himself?
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
he might be a redneck, but he respects black artists. hell, he emulates them.
republitards would not look kindly to a man who marries his cousin.
I'm sure jerry lee is no republitard, considering the "closed mindedness" of your party.
He is inspired by rosetta tharpe, not rush limdick.
you keep trying though.fight the good fight.
julieyard1 2 years ago
i have no problm w rednecks. i'd be a redneck if i knew how to fix a car. i'm a 5th generation virginian from the Shenandoah Valley. i buzz my own hair and hem my pants with a staple a gun.
im huge fan of jerry lee. the king of rockabilly. did you not see that i was questioning the the person of the comment as to why he used redneck as an insult?
"closed minded"becuz we dont want the currency to colapse and the nation to go bankrupt?!
& why comment that "he respects black artist"?
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
Lib-tard idiot.
I love it.
Coontoob 2 years ago 9
a repbultard with "coon" in your screen name?
and you wonder why the right wingnuts don't have power anymore.
aknowneemus 2 years ago
Well, anyone with "coon" in their screen name, is not going to be an ass kissing, pansy, pandering libfag, that's for damn sure. Now, the pansy lib media, and you other name calling libtards have branded "teabaggers" as rednecks, and racists. The truth is, they are patriotic citizens, who pay taxes, obey the laws, and stand up for their freedom. Unfortunately they are standing up for your freedom as well, even though you would rather have the government support you. Power in 2010!!!!
Coontoob 2 years ago 2
"thats right keithy" lol
kevlrey13 2 years ago
But it's good you at least admit Olbermann has an influence in the media.
It just angers me to see about half a million Republicans calling Olbermann "insignificant" though the previous vice president and the guy running for president last year went after him.
Levin is successful, but I still believe Olbermann has a bigger influence than he does. He gets more ratings because radios are much more portable than televisions and cheaper and don't need cable and such.
nafaidni 2 years ago
wrong
TheTrueConservative 2 years ago
Funny Lemons mentions ratings. If you look up "Mark Levin" on the search, you get 2770 results. "Keith Olbermann"? 13500. Haha, Countdown to irrelevance is Mark's little radio show.
Levin needs to shut the fuck up and stop calling the kettle black. He's an irrelevant, insignificant, incapable and unintelligent right wing prick who can only insult people based on sex appeal (though Keith, a 50 year old man, has a 25 year old girlfriend, even sadder, Lemons).
Keep crying, Mike-er, Mark- Levin!
nafaidni 2 years ago
levin has 400 stations and 7 million listerners
has sold 1,000,ooo,000 copiea of liberty ans tyranny
and has two previous best sellers
this started when olbermann belittled levin's leagle foundation on his msnbc show
levin ranted on air then begain receiving calls and emails from others,like dates, who spilled the beans on olbermann
levin is EXTREMELY competitive. i really dont like olbermann, but he's obviously had a nice carreer and makes a fortune, it;s being said that he is a super %
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
Can you spell that right, please? I can't understand that completely.
But anyway, there's no evidence that any of these people really dated Olbermann and there's no way to verify their stories. Discussing matters like this on radio is also despicable and shows what a pathetic debater and source of information Levin is.
And it's clear that radio shows have a higher audience capability. If Keith put his show on radio as well as television, his audience would probably double.
nafaidni 2 years ago
Godlesspanther,
Since you sound like a complete fucking idiot, there may be some truth to your comment.
postchevelle 2 years ago 2
i do speak the truth...indeed i do. you should be proud that you saw the truth, but i am sttill better for speaking the truth. for there is no truth without thee truth. thank me very much.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
Symphony 9, great.
yak6ex 2 years ago
i love mark levin
Vertigo3TC 2 years ago
Metal,
Why the hell would a liberal quote Nietzsche?
Vnntbls 2 years ago
nietzche is the preferred philosopher of the pseudo intellectual...not only is he good for a sound bite...but liberals share in his nihilistic view of humanity...or something like that
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
i'm guessing that by the name you're somewhat of a hippie. maybe pseudo intellectual who likes to trash sarah palin over a scone at the starbucks. quote neitzche and use words like sheeple?
may i ask your age...i'm conducting a survey. it;s okay, just relax i. work for the govenment.
theMETALDOVE 2 years ago
Savage thought of the word sheeple, I think.
yak6ex 2 years ago
No point in watching any more shit from Mark Levin. I can get more intelligent insight from my goldfish.
Godlesspanther 2 years ago