@lolerdelol...no logic says that if someone had such a machine that person would come up missing and all the data and the device itself would be confiscated... it would be suppressed and somehow turned into a weapon to then use on mankind .... ever heard of Tesla? Perfect example...he developed free energy and was destroyed for it...
if it was researched using the standard scientific model--a model that is in and of itself incomplete--it is no wonder that "proof" of these fields is lacking. A rather broad statement to make, I know, but I am open to researching it more. Would you please cite some of the experiments wherein these fields have been disproven?
@liquidzen1 look i don't care how you explain the lack of prove. its really simple, i'll be so generous to explain it to you. science=prove. pseudo-science=no prove+a cool story and certain illustrations that tickle the human's pattern recognition response and make simple minds like you think: hey there must be something to this.
let me put it like this. there is also no prove that i am a devine being with godly powers, you don't hear me say: prove that i'm not. no i say: you prove that i am!
@liquidzen1 let me put it another way. hoping to hit your logical spot. don't you think that if somebody invented some magical super extreme-curing-all-infinite-power-generating-field as it is described by many, somebody would already have made such a devise and sold billions of them? all such a person would have to do is go sit at the side of the road, let pople try it and all the media would be over him within a day and he would be stinking rich...
@liquidzen1 "Would you please cite some of the experiments wherein these fields have been disproven?" Are you a Moron? Even though failure is always an option, in Science, it's not about disproving anything, you twit, IT'S ALL ABOUT PROVING what you claim. I don't even know why I waste my time on shit like this, maybe I am the moron for researching with hope that someone can actually show some kind of proof. I MUST BE A DUMBASS!
pause the video towards the end?
anelphabet 2 months ago
LET me suggest you are missing at least one MORE wheel within the wheel.
LET me direct you to the Model that Plato was discussing?
LET me direct you to this Model that is a match for a modern digital sky survey of our solar system.
LET me direct you to a Model found on a CLAY PLATE that is 7000 years old that matches up with all of the above?
GO HERE: kachina2012.wordpress. com/2008/09/03/swastika-plate-5000-bc-is-a-model-of-the-milky-way/
islandbuoy4 3 months ago
SWASTIKA = TORSION FIELDS = WE ARE ONE
SWASTIKA = TETRAGRAMMATON = YHVH = GOD
TWO SWASTIKAS (cw and ccw) = DOUBLE HELIX = DNA
DNA = HOLY GRAIL
(DNA been on earth for 3-4 billion years...it is the blueprint for ALL LIFE on this baby blue.
Can we connect the double helix of DNA to the two SWASTIKAS?
(do a web search)
YES that is why the tetragrammaton was known to our ancestors...but sadly it has been vEILed by EvIL by LEvI priest nonsense.
LEvI = I^37
have a nice life waking up sheeple.
islandbuoy4 3 months ago
@lolerdelol...no logic says that if someone had such a machine that person would come up missing and all the data and the device itself would be confiscated... it would be suppressed and somehow turned into a weapon to then use on mankind .... ever heard of Tesla? Perfect example...he developed free energy and was destroyed for it...
gg6394 3 months ago
What a waste of time. this is some REALLY ridiculous bull$h!+. Idiots!
1clinttorris 1 year ago
Hm, maybe the ancients knew of these torsion fields, what do you think?
KCwellard 2 years ago
@KCwellard I think that is so of everything considered "new" KC.
Abobojo 2 years ago
@KCwellard sure, it was based on their intimate understanding of quantum mechanics.
come on people these fields have been researched and found to be total BS
lolerdelol 2 years ago
if it was researched using the standard scientific model--a model that is in and of itself incomplete--it is no wonder that "proof" of these fields is lacking. A rather broad statement to make, I know, but I am open to researching it more. Would you please cite some of the experiments wherein these fields have been disproven?
liquidzen1 1 year ago
@liquidzen1 look i don't care how you explain the lack of prove. its really simple, i'll be so generous to explain it to you. science=prove. pseudo-science=no prove+a cool story and certain illustrations that tickle the human's pattern recognition response and make simple minds like you think: hey there must be something to this.
let me put it like this. there is also no prove that i am a devine being with godly powers, you don't hear me say: prove that i'm not. no i say: you prove that i am!
lolerdelol 1 year ago
@liquidzen1 let me put it another way. hoping to hit your logical spot. don't you think that if somebody invented some magical super extreme-curing-all-infinite-power-generating-field as it is described by many, somebody would already have made such a devise and sold billions of them? all such a person would have to do is go sit at the side of the road, let pople try it and all the media would be over him within a day and he would be stinking rich...
lolerdelol 1 year ago
@liquidzen1 "Would you please cite some of the experiments wherein these fields have been disproven?" Are you a Moron? Even though failure is always an option, in Science, it's not about disproving anything, you twit, IT'S ALL ABOUT PROVING what you claim. I don't even know why I waste my time on shit like this, maybe I am the moron for researching with hope that someone can actually show some kind of proof. I MUST BE A DUMBASS!
1clinttorris 1 year ago
how do you use it ? BTW love that music
sickasso72 2 years ago
Very nicely done! Thanks a great big bunch :)
annabodhi38 2 years ago
help me! i dont get it :(
i want to..
poopz 2 years ago
Brilliant!
Gargeniture 2 years ago