No - It was man's sin that led to God's juggment via a global flood. This flood laid down sedimentary layers filled with flood victims - just as is found making up the crust of the earth today
According to the Word of God all land dwellers that breathed through their nostrils and were not on the ark died....plesiosaurs, fish, water dwelling mammals, insects and such would not have been on the ark and some managed to survive to repopulate the world
I suppose applying the term "ad hoc" is the best you can do with so obvious an answer Population genetics do no such thing. This is only your biased interpretation of genetics which is based upon your religious belief Population studies reveal that had we begun with 4 couples 4,400 years ago, and they and their offspring averaged having 2-3 children per couple, we would have about 6.5 billion people on earth today - which is how many people are indeed living today
Apparently you have no idea what I mean when I say population genetics, IE a bottleneck causes inbreeding so badly that genetic variability drops to zero EG the Cheetah
I thougth evolutionists always got angry at creationists for claiming that plesiosaurs were dinosaurs, because "dinosaurs are only techinically the ruling reptiles of the land". Make a rule, then stick to it.
This is a very good point. However, as dinos and plesiosaurs supposedly went extinct during the same time periods - according to the secular religious belief system, I do point to evidence of a plesiosaur having been alive as recently as 1925 In this instance he is just weakly attempting to argue with the overwhelming evidence I suppled
You should be ashamed by preying on your audiences gullibility. In one breath you dismiss some other "theory" for lack of evidence, then make a baseless assertion and cover your magic trick with a quick distraction.
Making people believe fire breathing dragons existed .... you really should be ashamed ...
"preying on your audiences gullibility" - You mean like teaching innocent children in schools that they evolved from a rock?
Your name calling is the last bastion for those with no evidence to back up the fraudulent claims they have been forcing on kids through Humanistic dominated textbooks for the past 50 years Making children believe they evolved from a rock " .... you really should be ashamed ..."
You teach that a big bang formed a big rock then it rained on the rock and eventually "poof" life began and evolved into all life forms...we can take it back to the rock Yes, I understand how it riles you to have me make it so simple to understand
*shakes head* - You throw in the Santa Claus. Why? For a "bit of fun"? For a joke? No.
You placed the Santa as a desperate tactical move. You use it to incite ridicule just after you present an opposing view. Sad desperate propaganda entertainment.
hahahah... oh my the classic bombardier beetle argument. You might want to research what happens when you mix hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinone. You will find that nothing happens. They evolution of the beetle has been closely researched. Just do some reading.
The only thing here unappealing is your willingness to continually spout fallacy for whatever reason it may be, whether financial or purely publicity.
You finally admitted to believing in the anti-science belief of spontaneous generation but you have not addressed how a living cell suddenly arose...Which came first, the cell membrane or the DNA to guide its formation, or the amino acids to form the proteins which form the membrane or how about the RNA-DNA system...and just how did the INFORMATION form out of nowhwere....no, you have not ansewred a thing
You protecting your beliefs is what I'm witnessing.
Imagine Russ. Imagine if you loose the 'ole bombardier beetle? Imagine? Then what's left? Haeckel and piltdown man. Nah best keep the 'ole the "Dragon beetle". Quite a few miles left in the little guy yet.
You do have other skills, don't you Russ? Just in case the bottom falls out of the creationist business. Nah don't worry I'm sure you can keep it running round and round for a few years yet. Pass the man another pig tooth!
Nebraska man never fooled anyone, Ida fills an important gap as the ancestor of wet and drynosed primates, its not sciences fault the media got ahold of her like they did, Lucy also falls exactly where predicted in the tree
Jorn Hurum and the team around Ida designed the way that she was released to the public, so even though it is not the scientific community's fault for the media's hype, it is the evolutionist's faults. If you don't believe me, just read the book or watch the DVD The Link - you'll actually read/hear some discussion on how evolution needs some icons to make people believe.
FYI Scientific American just had an article on Ida called "Weak Link" claiming it means nothing for human evolution.
I haven't contributed a cent to your pseudo-science. And you don't have to keep flattering yourself, it doesn't take an inordinate amount of time to debunk your nonsense.
No, its debunked in reality via reality. Like I said, don't flatter yourself, I spend a few minutes a week on your videos because scientific ignorance is scientific ignorance no matter where its posted and it deserves to be exposed as such
No, it says his tail moves like a cedar, and had you read on you would've noticed it says "he hides in a covert of reed and marsh" something a 75 foot tall brontosaurus is going to have trouble doing. The blue whale is actually the largest animal ever to have existed. Science is not done by show of hands.
The pre flood environment couldn't have been too great, it lead to the global flood.
CreationistCrap 2 years ago
No - It was man's sin that led to God's juggment via a global flood. This flood laid down sedimentary layers filled with flood victims - just as is found making up the crust of the earth today
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
"I think all the dinosaurs were killed in the flood"
Well that puts a damper on the claim in your last video that the Monster of Monterrey is a Plesiosaur.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
You left out the end of the sentence "except for the few on the ark."
Typical of your misleading rhetoric
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Except that Plesiosaurs need thousands of gallons of water, and a specialized diet only found in water.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
So you are saying they would not have any water in a worldwide flood?
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Outside the boat, where you said everything died.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
According to the Word of God all land dwellers that breathed through their nostrils and were not on the ark died....plesiosaurs, fish, water dwelling mammals, insects and such would not have been on the ark and some managed to survive to repopulate the world
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
How very ad hoc of you, it still doesn't change the fact that population genetics irrefutably debunks the silly notion of the ark as a literal event.
HowToTriforce 2 years ago
I suppose applying the term "ad hoc" is the best you can do with so obvious an answer Population genetics do no such thing. This is only your biased interpretation of genetics which is based upon your religious belief Population studies reveal that had we begun with 4 couples 4,400 years ago, and they and their offspring averaged having 2-3 children per couple, we would have about 6.5 billion people on earth today - which is how many people are indeed living today
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Apparently you have no idea what I mean when I say population genetics, IE a bottleneck causes inbreeding so badly that genetic variability drops to zero EG the Cheetah
/watch?v=rIlWKp44T50
CreationistCrap 2 years ago
I thougth evolutionists always got angry at creationists for claiming that plesiosaurs were dinosaurs, because "dinosaurs are only techinically the ruling reptiles of the land". Make a rule, then stick to it.
Vertisai 2 years ago
This is a very good point. However, as dinos and plesiosaurs supposedly went extinct during the same time periods - according to the secular religious belief system, I do point to evidence of a plesiosaur having been alive as recently as 1925 In this instance he is just weakly attempting to argue with the overwhelming evidence I suppled
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
No, you point to a single picture from almost 100 years ago, I can point to pictures of aliens and big foot
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
Real scientists must cringe at comments from "the science foundation" whose true name should be the humanist foundation
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
...or...The Science Fiction Foundation...
cathy356 2 years ago
Where are you getting that "dinosaurs are only techinically the ruling reptiles of the land" ?
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
You should be ashamed by preying on your audiences gullibility. In one breath you dismiss some other "theory" for lack of evidence, then make a baseless assertion and cover your magic trick with a quick distraction.
Making people believe fire breathing dragons existed .... you really should be ashamed ...
Propaganda and entertainment.
A lobotomy and a show.
Danmill23 2 years ago 2
"preying on your audiences gullibility" - You mean like teaching innocent children in schools that they evolved from a rock?
Your name calling is the last bastion for those with no evidence to back up the fraudulent claims they have been forcing on kids through Humanistic dominated textbooks for the past 50 years Making children believe they evolved from a rock " .... you really should be ashamed ..."
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
I'd like you to provide a single source from a single secular institute that says evolution is "people coming from a rock"
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
You teach that a big bang formed a big rock then it rained on the rock and eventually "poof" life began and evolved into all life forms...we can take it back to the rock Yes, I understand how it riles you to have me make it so simple to understand
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
*shakes head* - You throw in the Santa Claus. Why? For a "bit of fun"? For a joke? No.
You placed the Santa as a desperate tactical move. You use it to incite ridicule just after you present an opposing view. Sad desperate propaganda entertainment.
The Cedar is a likely a phallic reference BTW.
Job 40:21 Under the lotus plants he lies,
hidden among the reeds in the marsh.
It's a hippo! ... Sheesh
Danmill23 2 years ago
Yeah, a hippo with a tail like a cedar - LOL
Your problem is that if dinosaurs and man lived at the same time, as the evidence clearly reveals, then Darwinism is deader than a doornail
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
hahahah... oh my the classic bombardier beetle argument. You might want to research what happens when you mix hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinone. You will find that nothing happens. They evolution of the beetle has been closely researched. Just do some reading.
warloxintubesox 2 years ago
Your desparation is an ugly thing to have to witness
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
The only thing here unappealing is your willingness to continually spout fallacy for whatever reason it may be, whether financial or purely publicity.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
Billions of dollars are spent promoting your religious view through public schools
So how did life begin? LOL
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
That makes 4 times I've answered that question without you answering my micro-macro evolution question once.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
You finally admitted to believing in the anti-science belief of spontaneous generation but you have not addressed how a living cell suddenly arose...Which came first, the cell membrane or the DNA to guide its formation, or the amino acids to form the proteins which form the membrane or how about the RNA-DNA system...and just how did the INFORMATION form out of nowhwere....no, you have not ansewred a thing
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
You protecting your beliefs is what I'm witnessing.
Imagine Russ. Imagine if you loose the 'ole bombardier beetle? Imagine? Then what's left? Haeckel and piltdown man. Nah best keep the 'ole the "Dragon beetle". Quite a few miles left in the little guy yet.
You do have other skills, don't you Russ? Just in case the bottom falls out of the creationist business. Nah don't worry I'm sure you can keep it running round and round for a few years yet. Pass the man another pig tooth!
Danmill23 2 years ago
A pig's tooth? How about Ida? Or Lucy? or how about discussing the "Origin of the species"....how did life begin?
You guys are funny
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Nebraska man never fooled anyone, Ida fills an important gap as the ancestor of wet and drynosed primates, its not sciences fault the media got ahold of her like they did, Lucy also falls exactly where predicted in the tree
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
Nebraska man, I mean the tree of life, is another of the Humanistic fairy tales.
As NEW SCIENTIST just reported, the tree of life lies in tatters, torn to pieces by an onslaught of negative evidence
SEE: Why Darwin Was Wrong About The Tree Of Life; New Scientist - 2692; 2009
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Jorn Hurum and the team around Ida designed the way that she was released to the public, so even though it is not the scientific community's fault for the media's hype, it is the evolutionist's faults. If you don't believe me, just read the book or watch the DVD The Link - you'll actually read/hear some discussion on how evolution needs some icons to make people believe.
FYI Scientific American just had an article on Ida called "Weak Link" claiming it means nothing for human evolution.
Vertisai 2 years ago
Boy, you can sure tell when you people are defeated..
cathy356 2 years ago
I was just wondering, how much money do you make off these people?
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
How much have I made off of you? You spend more time on my site than anyone.
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
I haven't contributed a cent to your pseudo-science. And you don't have to keep flattering yourself, it doesn't take an inordinate amount of time to debunk your nonsense.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
First, point A is my point. Second, you have not debunked anything except in your own mind
So why do you spend so much time on my videos? I am concerned for you
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
No, its debunked in reality via reality. Like I said, don't flatter yourself, I spend a few minutes a week on your videos because scientific ignorance is scientific ignorance no matter where its posted and it deserves to be exposed as such
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
You spend all the time (you send me 20+ comments alomost every day) because you are defending your religious belief
That is commendable. I wish professing Christians had your faith
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
No, it says his tail moves like a cedar, and had you read on you would've noticed it says "he hides in a covert of reed and marsh" something a 75 foot tall brontosaurus is going to have trouble doing. The blue whale is actually the largest animal ever to have existed. Science is not done by show of hands.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
This is incredible! Again, thanks for the facts, and Lord bless!
us4HIM 2 years ago