"I brought Israel up out of Egypt. I delivered you from Egyptian oppression—yes, from all the bullying governments that made your life miserable. And now you want nothing to do with your God, the very God who has a history of getting you out of troubles of all sorts. "And now you say, 'No! We want a king; give us a king!' "Well, if that's what you want, that's what you'll get! Present yourselves formally before God, ranked in tribes and families."
"...YOU use it on your families before you put it on our families. " THE HEALTHCARE CONGRESS HAS NOW IS WHAT THEY WANT FOR ALL AMERICANS! More proof of the validity of the so called "facts" this guy is spewing. Listen CLOSELY to all the so called "FACTS' that this guy is spewing and you will see through his intentions. FEAR + IGNORANCE This is EXACTLY what New Word Order recruits with -- FEAR + IGNORANCE
"His son will get no care what so ever" ?? I think that doesn't square with the facts. Proof of being unhinged and using exagerated ingnorance + fear.
Yeah, 'you don't have to take it' NOW, but it will be absolute later on. I don't understand why this administration is looking into a major overhaul of the healthcare system when all that is required is putting a capoff on medical cost and medication, dughh.That is the major problem.The simplest procedures, the costs for them are astronomical. Why not just put a capoff on them, continue to offer the poor and disable Medicare and allow employers to continue providing healthcare?It's cheaper!
Do you have any idea how dumb you are? It is doubtful this guy has the money to pay for private health insurance for his handicapped son. His son probably gets his health insurance where most disabled people get their insurance - through the federal government. Absent this system of socialized medicine any disabled person without extraordinarily wealthy relatives would be left to die.
He just repeats the most preposterous lies cooked up by the insurance industry. And he is a hero to you?
Ummm excuse me but I hadn't realized that socialism had become the American way. Without this Obamacare his son will have a better chance to live. You, sir are the dumb one. Just like the masses of Germans who foolishly believed Hitler would deliver them.
Without socialized health insurance the vast majority of disabled people would be left to die. Only a small minority with quite wealthy family members could be cared for by family. And given that private charity doesn't come close to providing even a tenth of what our minimal welfare state does, most would clearly be left to die or euthanized. You can say socialism is immoral or unamerican. I contend that taking take of people like this man's son is the only thing todo in a decent society.
But as for your insane, delusional claims that Obama's plan condemns people like this guy's son to death; Where do you come up with this braindead drivel? Do you just believe every absurd lie talk radio shoves down your throat? Don't you think if you want to participate in a supposedly democratic society that you should take some care to get some facts, or at least try to conduct a bit of rational thought?
For instance, you talk about Hitler but we both know that you've never read a single book on the Nazis. You've haven't read a single book on history period. Unless you count a textbook from junior high or high school.
So how could you call someone a Nazi? The only thing you know about the Nazis are that they are the bad guys in a bunch of movies you saw. Or perhaps some conman on the radio talked about how evil "socialism" is because Nazi stands for National Socialist.
You need to quiet while you are ahead, okay. You don't know me, you've never meet me. It seem like you would take the time to find out if I have any credible knowledge on Hitler before you assume that I don't know what I am talking about. I have studied Hitler and his tactics. I have read Mein Kampf, and I know that he was nothing more than a demagogue in that he merely used the preexisting
anti-Semitic climate, depression and bewilderment of the German people, which came as a consequence of the first World War and the Crash of '29, which precipitated the Great Depression, he used these things as tools to deceive the people into thinking the Jews and all others who were not Aryan, where their enemies. The same tactics Hitler used to sell his Nazism to Germany, is the same tactics employed by Barack—WAKE UP!
We both know you haven't read Mein Kampf nor any other book on Nazism. If you had, the fact that you are comparing Obama to Hitler would only reflect all the more poorly on you, because it would prove that you're not ignorant but rather incapable of rational thought.
Hitler wanted to eliminate the Jews, Obama has Jews in the majority of top leadership positions in his administrations. Hitler appealed to racism - I don't think that you're dumb enough to think that Obama is doing the same.
How do you know what I've read? You presume to much and that is your problem. If you know how silly you are making yourself look, you would quite, lol.
By your last paragraph, it is clear that you were incapable of properly comprehending what I have been saying all along in my comments. This thing is not about Jews, it's not about blacks, it's not about whites, it's about sick, evil people who want supreme control over human beings and we think, do, and believe.
That is what eugenics is all about. NO ONE IS SAFE under it, not you, not me, not even the people who lobby for policies to be pass that would facility egenics. The REemmergance of eugenics is starting with thisstarting with this sick health care bill.
Now they are talking about redrafting the bill because they forgot to include senior citizens in it.How rediculous is that.They are trying to play the common man for a fool and pimp the notion of BO's alleged...
... "inexperience." These people who are pulling Barack's strings want the common man to believe that he is just a little inexperienced and so he is going to make careless blunders here and there.Whatever man! Barack is one thing, but you mean to tell me his whole administration missed including provision under this new bill to seniors? Please, they purposely left them out as well as the handicap and they were hoping that people would not notice.That's why they re rushing this thing though.
What the hell does "putting them on block" mean? Obviously I didn't and couldn't block anyone from responding to what I wrote. So your charge of cowardice is a baseless slander.
When I tried to post a comment under my ECE4life account, it would not post. When that happens, it is usually because the user has blocked you. When I logged on under my Graceupenya.. account the same exact comment posted.This is why I was under the impression that I was blocked.Now if you did not block me and it was a glitch in YT's system, then I sincerely apologize.
It was not my intention to slander you, I haven't the time and what is it going to help. This is not the time for that.
This is pride. You assume that I am only listening to what everybody else is saying. I have a brain and I have looked stuff up. In addition, BO has told on himself dozens of time. This is commonsense, not controlled perception. While the ruling elite (those who really run this country) have got diehard supports of this modern day Hitler thinking that the criticism is a smear campaign spawn by the Rep, they are allowed to go undetected in their scheme to establish a controlled welfare state.
This guy is UNHINGED! Also, closely listen to his facts in his interview. Misguided RAGE! UNHINGED!! Hes now getting visitors in the middle of the night. UNHINGED!!! This is you brain on FEAR & IGNORANCE!! A self-destructive cocktail. See Valano72, shes another NOW HACK with factless allocation of the aliens are coming and take us all away UNHINGED!!! Remember, listen to all his crasy allogations and "facts"
TERRORISTS....intimidate and threaten people for political reasons and gain....these thugs seiu acorn and the like are terrorists...union thugs beware....we are armed and will protect ourselves from you Facist punkasses
The rep. told on the administration here. The purpose of an amendment is to add to a bill that has already been drafted. Now if this health care bill was all encompassing, then the handicap, elderly, and disable should have been acknowledged in it. Therefore it would be no need for an amendment. That admission from the rep. only affirms what those with a working brain already know, this healthcare bill is NOT all-encompassing. It is Hitler's Germany all over again and blatant eugenics.
The elderly are already provided for under Medicare and the disabled are provided for under Social Security and other regulations. So there is no need to provide welfare state benefits to them in this bill.
Interestingly, your critique is the exact opposite of the primary critique of the bill, which is an argument that the government should subsidize health insurance for those unable or unwilling to pay for it. In other words this critique implicitly supports the eugenics position.
Yeah, you've got a point there. But I can see the Obamites saying, "well, the reason we need to do away with Medicaid and SS is because it is taxing our national budget." My response to that would be, it seems like this new health care bill is going to grossly tax the national budget. It's projected to be in the trillions. See ppl fail to realize that socialism is nothing more than a precursor to communism and in a communist state, the state owns the ppl...
The state owns the means of production, i.e. labor because at the end of the day, that is the nuts and bolts of any nations economy—LABOR, no matter what the exported goods are. You will always need workers to produce the goods and if there are machines manufacturing the products, you will always need humans to program and maintain those machines.
My point is, the ruling elite of this country wanna get rich off free labor. In a communist state, the country gets rich, but the common gets nothing!
My critique in no way supports eugenics. When Nazi Germany fell, the philosophies behind eugenics were never dispelled; they only went underground to reemerge later on. This is that later on. Eugenics is written all in the new bill. When the state starts rationing out health care, they decide who lives and who dies...
I'll give you credit for at least looking up the definition of social. It is "the public (but not necessarily state) ownership of the means of production (of wealth.) However, contrary to your understanding "the means of production" entails factories, machines and other tangible items. It certainly does not include labor.
In the system of capitalism (i.e. private ownership of the means of production) workers are forced to earn subsistence by selling their wage-labor.
Welfare benefits like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are not strictly speaking socialist policies. However they are policies favored by socialists against the opposition of the right (including all of the Republican party and substantial partys of the Democratic party.)
These welfare state measures are also good programs. They help people who would otherwise be neglected. So why would you oppose extending this type of effective helping hand to others? You're being inconsistent.
U R really something. I didn't have to go look up anything during the course of your condescending tirade and assault on my level of education of this issue. I know what socialism looks like.
See that's what Ur kind does. When I say your kind, I am referring to people who wanna push a ridiculous agenda that will only hurt people in the end. U don't have any way to defend your idiotic rhetoric and so you come back with backhanded insults and try to act like you are the most informed.
But then you end up revealing just how little you know. You don't know didly swat about anything.
The "means of production" will always go back to "labor," i.e. human labor. Like I said before, we can build factories with machinery, but who built the factory, and orchestrated the systems by which things would need to be done in that factory, who maintains the production or output of the machinery, HUMANS, i.e. human labor.
Look up any book on socialism and it will tell you that the term of art "the means of production" does not entail wage-labor. Your mistake shows that you have very little knowledge of socialism.
In capitalist systems people are force to sell their wage labor in order to get money for necessities. Your boss doesn't own you in the sense that a chattel slave is owned, however your boss can exercise a wide variety of arbitrary control over you.
So in capitalism you're essentially owned by your boss for ca. 1/2 of your waking hours that you are at work. And then he takes the product of your labor, sells it and cuts you in for a (typically small) portion of the proceeds so that you can purchase necessities.
This system might be better called wage-slavery because it is totally involuntary. You've inverted reality by attributing the concept of involuntary labor to socialism.
Then why did you give me credit because you thought I looked up the definition. Evidently I got something right if you gave me credit for it (even thought I did not need to look up the definition).
Look at you trying to deflect attention away from the real issue by putting emphasis on something so trivial. That's what you people do. I will now endure you in this conversation any longer.
I didn't say you looked up the definition in response to me. But clearly you looked up the def. because you thought that "means of production" included labor. That is a reasonable interpretation of the plain English meaning of the phrase.
But in reality "means of production" is a term of art. One would not have to go very far in studying socialism to find this out. I'm not saying socialism is a perfect system. I'm saying there's a reason there are big "Socialist" parties in Europe.
You have selective amnesia you know. Scroll back to page 2 and you will find your comment when you said, "I'll give you credit for at least looking up the definition of social."
At that time, I did not look up the definition because I had already knew it before I began to speak on it.
FOR YOUR BENEFIT, I looked up the definition like 5 minute ago for in order to give you the definitive definition on the expression "means of production."
Welfare state programs like Social Security and Medicare are measures to relieve the worst effects of capitalism. Before they were instituted old people were left to starve and die of treatable medical conditions. Only an idiot could claim that the "only harm people in the end."
So the question is "Why would oppose extending these programs to all people?" Why can't a wealthy society like our see to it that everyone has a decent standard of living?
To satisfy your ignorance on the topic of socialism and what is meant by the term, "means of production," I found this definition to pass on to you for your benefit-
"Means of production (abbreviated MoP; German: Produktionsmittel), are things used by human labourers to create products. "
Note the two terms "human" and "labourers" in this definition. This point directly to what I have repeatedly stated before. Please confirm this if you like. I got it from wikipedia.
U took offense at something that u inferred into what I said. I didn't say u looked up "socialism" in response to me. Nor were justified in thinking that I had implied such.
But clearly u did (at some point) look up a definition of socialism. Unfortunately u mistook a term of art for a phrase with a straightforward plain English meaning.
Then u try to retain your misunderstanding by effectively claiming "things used by a laborer" can include the laborer herself.
I think it would be a true sign of an ability to learn to allow new facts and new understandings to replace older mistaken views, even if you arrived at your older understandings in a logical manner.
Look at you fragmenting because you can't stand to be wrong.If I found that I misspoke about something I would admit it and move on,but you can't do that because you are the classic ignorant person. Now you are sitting up here lying about what you said.I wonder whats next,are you going to go back and delete the comment where you gave me accolades because you falsely assumed that I had to look up the definition?
This is sooo simple; Im done for real this time. I will give you the last word
Anyone can see that I never claimed that you looked up the def. IN RESPONSE TO ME. U show your lack of civility by accusing me of lying when I pointed out that you inference was unfounded.
Also anyone can see that you're wrong about the meaning of "means of production." Even by your own account it entail "THINGS...used by laborers" not people or labor.
Why not be civil and try learning? Why not be decent and favor extending health care coverage to those not covered by Medicare?
We will give you a million bucks in free health care..... and he says "NO NO NO NO NO NO"..... more proof of being unhinged. Pure hatred for a black man in the white house. Total frustration that a black man got into the white house. Oh, they through it would happen someday. BUT NOT SO QUICKLY!! So the New York Times is the Bill??? MORE DELUSION!! UNHINGED!! UNHINGED!!! Now he wants to kill somebody. UNHINGED!!! LISTEN TO HIS UNSUPPORTED RANTS!! Where is he getting this CRAP!!??
No it's not!!!!!!!!! Wake up and stop putting your ethnicity in this. This is not about BO ethnicity. U see, this is why the ruling elite prompted this man up as a candidate n funded his campaign enormously!!!!! Hasn't it occurred to you that the racist people who are stance pupils of the eugenics (i.e. ethic cleansing) philosophy is trying to enact blatant eugenics through Barack. Why, because they are using his blackness as a distraction so that ppl like you will not see what is coming...
I would like to say that I think it is rather callous and ignorant on your part to overlook the fact that this man has a handicap son who is CLEARLY threatened under this imposing new bill and automatically assume because the man has white skin he has an issue with being under a black president. That is NOT the issue and I really wish that ignorant black people would stop throwing the race card up in here to justify whites disliking BO's politics...
Yes, there are some whites and BLACKS who still dont like the idea of being subject to a black person, especially a black man. But you have to be open minded enough to decipher between legitimate criticism like what is being displayed in this clip and when some ignorant high-minded white person dont wanna be subject to a black person. You are thinking the way you have been programmed by the racist white ruling elites want you to think. Many of them are eugenics. Think !!!
Kudos,Mike!You are a hero.....and your concern for your son is well-founded.Dr.Death,Ezekiel Emanuel is Obummer's advisor and his Nazi policy involves denying care to the handicapped....be they young or old.......saving trillions on the lives of Americans.THese libtards do not care about health or people!!
This is natural reaction. This is people like me who have experieced 8 years of pure hatred from libs, and then being called racists out of the blue for 2 years during the campaign becuz of a man who went to a racist church, Obama apologizing to the world for our beautiful, righteous country, and now Marxist legislation.
I would love to scream bloody murder right in Barbara Boxer's face, Rahm Emanuel's, Murtha, even McCain for lecturing us about "compassion" towards illegal immigrants.
But more to the point; Where in the world has Obama apologized for the behavior of the US? The answer is of course nowhere. You could easily disprove me by providing a link to a single instance in which Obama tells another country "sorry" or "we apologize" or "we regret..." or something equivalent. You can't because he hasn't apologized to any other country.
Clinton did make two apologies while president. One to Rwanda for doing nothing to stop
the genocide of Tutsi. The other to Guatemala for our (US) support for a string of brutal military dictators how slaughtered ca. 200,000 indigenous people in what can only be called a genocide. Both apologies were appropriate.
The basic tone of your comment is that the US does no wrong and that we are motivated by higher ideals than other countries. Only an idiot could hold either of these positions.
What a well reasoned response! You're right, I give up. This country is perfect. We never do anything wrong. We're infinitely superior to all other countries and other peoples in every respect especially in terms of ethical values.
But seriously when you're out around thinking adults you should bite your tongue or you'll be embarrassed because you're retarded evil little shit!
Also note that you didn't provide any link to any statement where Obama apologizes for the US for ANYTHING. The reason is obvious, you were lying saying that he had gone around apologizing. You make these retarded statements and then you fail to provide a shred of evidence to back them up.
why don't you google it douchebag....are you that fucking out of touch that YOU DON"T REMEMBER?!?!?!?!?!? He was all over Europe smacktalking his own country....passively of course!! It was all over the news....all over the internet...all over the radio??? I just googled it and found 889,000 hits on this subject....now who's the retard????????
Just provide the link to a reliable transcript of him saying anything that constitutes an apology. You can't because he didn't.
Your contention that typing in some search terms and get back results proves your position is retarded. For instance I just googled "Jews were responsible for the holocaust" and I got 47 million results. Does that mean this idea is confirmed?
You have no clue what constitutes proof. I don't even like Obama but it is pathetic that you have to lie about him.
You've essentially admitted that you were lying when you said Obama had gone around the world apologizing for America.
And you've confirmed that when people like yourself call someone "anti-American" what you really mean is someone who admits that the US is not perfect.
My message to you is that the decent people in the US are waking up. When we come across people like you were going to shame you, humiliate you and expose your evil to everyone (and we won't hire you.)
No, you're a childish moron who makes elaborate posts to try to make yourself look impressive. Get therapy. You sadly believe you can intimidate people on the anonymous Internet.
lmao pelosi and her cohurts will feel like hideing with obama after they screwed us with there NEW WORLD ORDER CRAP. how do you like them now ?????
surfjerr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Samuel 10:17-19
"I brought Israel up out of Egypt. I delivered you from Egyptian oppression—yes, from all the bullying governments that made your life miserable. And now you want nothing to do with your God, the very God who has a history of getting you out of troubles of all sorts. "And now you say, 'No! We want a king; give us a king!' "Well, if that's what you want, that's what you'll get! Present yourselves formally before God, ranked in tribes and families."
shellynichole71 2 years ago
Pelosi and others are Nazi's
josephdupont 2 years ago 3
I love this guy! More Americans need to have his kind of courage. He stood up and was heard. I tip my hat to you sir.
evildevinity 2 years ago 2
Dingell should retire immediately.
THX1138x29 2 years ago
"...YOU use it on your families before you put it on our families. " THE HEALTHCARE CONGRESS HAS NOW IS WHAT THEY WANT FOR ALL AMERICANS! More proof of the validity of the so called "facts" this guy is spewing. Listen CLOSELY to all the so called "FACTS' that this guy is spewing and you will see through his intentions. FEAR + IGNORANCE This is EXACTLY what New Word Order recruits with -- FEAR + IGNORANCE
TellitToMe100 2 years ago 2
"His son will get no care what so ever" ?? I think that doesn't square with the facts. Proof of being unhinged and using exagerated ingnorance + fear.
TellitToMe100 2 years ago 2
Palin using her son why do these people use there kids to prove there points its sick,
d2tminc 2 years ago
I'm beginning to think this guy has NO FACTS. FEAR & IGNORANCE--dangerous cocktail.
TellitToMe100 2 years ago
The plan Congress Dingell has IS THE PLAN Obama wants to offer to everyone. AND YOU DON"T HAVE TO TAKE IT!!
TellitToMe100 2 years ago
Yeah, 'you don't have to take it' NOW, but it will be absolute later on. I don't understand why this administration is looking into a major overhaul of the healthcare system when all that is required is putting a capoff on medical cost and medication, dughh.That is the major problem.The simplest procedures, the costs for them are astronomical. Why not just put a capoff on them, continue to offer the poor and disable Medicare and allow employers to continue providing healthcare?It's cheaper!
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
What a brave man. The true American Patriot! God bless him!
Politicalchick99 2 years ago
Do you have any idea how dumb you are? It is doubtful this guy has the money to pay for private health insurance for his handicapped son. His son probably gets his health insurance where most disabled people get their insurance - through the federal government. Absent this system of socialized medicine any disabled person without extraordinarily wealthy relatives would be left to die.
He just repeats the most preposterous lies cooked up by the insurance industry. And he is a hero to you?
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
Ummm excuse me but I hadn't realized that socialism had become the American way. Without this Obamacare his son will have a better chance to live. You, sir are the dumb one. Just like the masses of Germans who foolishly believed Hitler would deliver them.
Politicalchick99 2 years ago
Without socialized health insurance the vast majority of disabled people would be left to die. Only a small minority with quite wealthy family members could be cared for by family. And given that private charity doesn't come close to providing even a tenth of what our minimal welfare state does, most would clearly be left to die or euthanized. You can say socialism is immoral or unamerican. I contend that taking take of people like this man's son is the only thing todo in a decent society.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
But as for your insane, delusional claims that Obama's plan condemns people like this guy's son to death; Where do you come up with this braindead drivel? Do you just believe every absurd lie talk radio shoves down your throat? Don't you think if you want to participate in a supposedly democratic society that you should take some care to get some facts, or at least try to conduct a bit of rational thought?
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
For instance, you talk about Hitler but we both know that you've never read a single book on the Nazis. You've haven't read a single book on history period. Unless you count a textbook from junior high or high school.
So how could you call someone a Nazi? The only thing you know about the Nazis are that they are the bad guys in a bunch of movies you saw. Or perhaps some conman on the radio talked about how evil "socialism" is because Nazi stands for National Socialist.
You're pathetic.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
Continued from EnChristos...
You need to quiet while you are ahead, okay. You don't know me, you've never meet me. It seem like you would take the time to find out if I have any credible knowledge on Hitler before you assume that I don't know what I am talking about. I have studied Hitler and his tactics. I have read Mein Kampf, and I know that he was nothing more than a demagogue in that he merely used the preexisting
GraceUpEnyaFace 2 years ago
Continued from EnChristos...
anti-Semitic climate, depression and bewilderment of the German people, which came as a consequence of the first World War and the Crash of '29, which precipitated the Great Depression, he used these things as tools to deceive the people into thinking the Jews and all others who were not Aryan, where their enemies. The same tactics Hitler used to sell his Nazism to Germany, is the same tactics employed by Barack—WAKE UP!
GraceUpEnyaFace 2 years ago
We both know you haven't read Mein Kampf nor any other book on Nazism. If you had, the fact that you are comparing Obama to Hitler would only reflect all the more poorly on you, because it would prove that you're not ignorant but rather incapable of rational thought.
Hitler wanted to eliminate the Jews, Obama has Jews in the majority of top leadership positions in his administrations. Hitler appealed to racism - I don't think that you're dumb enough to think that Obama is doing the same.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
How do you know what I've read? You presume to much and that is your problem. If you know how silly you are making yourself look, you would quite, lol.
By your last paragraph, it is clear that you were incapable of properly comprehending what I have been saying all along in my comments. This thing is not about Jews, it's not about blacks, it's not about whites, it's about sick, evil people who want supreme control over human beings and we think, do, and believe.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
In addition, fjfjvmvm...
That is what eugenics is all about. NO ONE IS SAFE under it, not you, not me, not even the people who lobby for policies to be pass that would facility egenics. The REemmergance of eugenics is starting with thisstarting with this sick health care bill.
Now they are talking about redrafting the bill because they forgot to include senior citizens in it.How rediculous is that.They are trying to play the common man for a fool and pimp the notion of BO's alleged...
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
... "inexperience." These people who are pulling Barack's strings want the common man to believe that he is just a little inexperienced and so he is going to make careless blunders here and there.Whatever man! Barack is one thing, but you mean to tell me his whole administration missed including provision under this new bill to seniors? Please, they purposely left them out as well as the handicap and they were hoping that people would not notice.That's why they re rushing this thing though.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
Fjfjvmvm,
You need to stop insulting people and then putting them on block. That is sooo cowardly.
from Enchristoseime4life
GraceUpEnyaFace 2 years ago
What the hell does "putting them on block" mean? Obviously I didn't and couldn't block anyone from responding to what I wrote. So your charge of cowardice is a baseless slander.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago 2
When I tried to post a comment under my ECE4life account, it would not post. When that happens, it is usually because the user has blocked you. When I logged on under my Graceupenya.. account the same exact comment posted.This is why I was under the impression that I was blocked.Now if you did not block me and it was a glitch in YT's system, then I sincerely apologize.
It was not my intention to slander you, I haven't the time and what is it going to help. This is not the time for that.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
This is pride. You assume that I am only listening to what everybody else is saying. I have a brain and I have looked stuff up. In addition, BO has told on himself dozens of time. This is commonsense, not controlled perception. While the ruling elite (those who really run this country) have got diehard supports of this modern day Hitler thinking that the criticism is a smear campaign spawn by the Rep, they are allowed to go undetected in their scheme to establish a controlled welfare state.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
This guy is UNHINGED! Also, closely listen to his facts in his interview. Misguided RAGE! UNHINGED!! Hes now getting visitors in the middle of the night. UNHINGED!!! This is you brain on FEAR & IGNORANCE!! A self-destructive cocktail. See Valano72, shes another NOW HACK with factless allocation of the aliens are coming and take us all away UNHINGED!!! Remember, listen to all his crasy allogations and "facts"
TellitToMe100 2 years ago
TERRORISTS....intimidate and threaten people for political reasons and gain....these thugs seiu acorn and the like are terrorists...union thugs beware....we are armed and will protect ourselves from you Facist punkasses
TheFreedomFan 2 years ago
The rep. told on the administration here. The purpose of an amendment is to add to a bill that has already been drafted. Now if this health care bill was all encompassing, then the handicap, elderly, and disable should have been acknowledged in it. Therefore it would be no need for an amendment. That admission from the rep. only affirms what those with a working brain already know, this healthcare bill is NOT all-encompassing. It is Hitler's Germany all over again and blatant eugenics.
GraceUpEnyaFace 2 years ago
The elderly are already provided for under Medicare and the disabled are provided for under Social Security and other regulations. So there is no need to provide welfare state benefits to them in this bill.
Interestingly, your critique is the exact opposite of the primary critique of the bill, which is an argument that the government should subsidize health insurance for those unable or unwilling to pay for it. In other words this critique implicitly supports the eugenics position.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
Yeah, you've got a point there. But I can see the Obamites saying, "well, the reason we need to do away with Medicaid and SS is because it is taxing our national budget." My response to that would be, it seems like this new health care bill is going to grossly tax the national budget. It's projected to be in the trillions. See ppl fail to realize that socialism is nothing more than a precursor to communism and in a communist state, the state owns the ppl...
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
The state owns the means of production, i.e. labor because at the end of the day, that is the nuts and bolts of any nations economy—LABOR, no matter what the exported goods are. You will always need workers to produce the goods and if there are machines manufacturing the products, you will always need humans to program and maintain those machines.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
Lastly, Fjfjvmvm,
My point is, the ruling elite of this country wanna get rich off free labor. In a communist state, the country gets rich, but the common gets nothing!
My critique in no way supports eugenics. When Nazi Germany fell, the philosophies behind eugenics were never dispelled; they only went underground to reemerge later on. This is that later on. Eugenics is written all in the new bill. When the state starts rationing out health care, they decide who lives and who dies...
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
I'll give you credit for at least looking up the definition of social. It is "the public (but not necessarily state) ownership of the means of production (of wealth.) However, contrary to your understanding "the means of production" entails factories, machines and other tangible items. It certainly does not include labor.
In the system of capitalism (i.e. private ownership of the means of production) workers are forced to earn subsistence by selling their wage-labor.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
Welfare benefits like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are not strictly speaking socialist policies. However they are policies favored by socialists against the opposition of the right (including all of the Republican party and substantial partys of the Democratic party.)
These welfare state measures are also good programs. They help people who would otherwise be neglected. So why would you oppose extending this type of effective helping hand to others? You're being inconsistent.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
U R really something. I didn't have to go look up anything during the course of your condescending tirade and assault on my level of education of this issue. I know what socialism looks like.
See that's what Ur kind does. When I say your kind, I am referring to people who wanna push a ridiculous agenda that will only hurt people in the end. U don't have any way to defend your idiotic rhetoric and so you come back with backhanded insults and try to act like you are the most informed.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
But then you end up revealing just how little you know. You don't know didly swat about anything.
The "means of production" will always go back to "labor," i.e. human labor. Like I said before, we can build factories with machinery, but who built the factory, and orchestrated the systems by which things would need to be done in that factory, who maintains the production or output of the machinery, HUMANS, i.e. human labor.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
At any rate, I'm done with you. You are willfully ignorant N that's that!
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
Look up any book on socialism and it will tell you that the term of art "the means of production" does not entail wage-labor. Your mistake shows that you have very little knowledge of socialism.
In capitalist systems people are force to sell their wage labor in order to get money for necessities. Your boss doesn't own you in the sense that a chattel slave is owned, however your boss can exercise a wide variety of arbitrary control over you.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
So in capitalism you're essentially owned by your boss for ca. 1/2 of your waking hours that you are at work. And then he takes the product of your labor, sells it and cuts you in for a (typically small) portion of the proceeds so that you can purchase necessities.
This system might be better called wage-slavery because it is totally involuntary. You've inverted reality by attributing the concept of involuntary labor to socialism.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
Then why did you give me credit because you thought I looked up the definition. Evidently I got something right if you gave me credit for it (even thought I did not need to look up the definition).
Look at you trying to deflect attention away from the real issue by putting emphasis on something so trivial. That's what you people do. I will now endure you in this conversation any longer.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
I didn't say you looked up the definition in response to me. But clearly you looked up the def. because you thought that "means of production" included labor. That is a reasonable interpretation of the plain English meaning of the phrase.
But in reality "means of production" is a term of art. One would not have to go very far in studying socialism to find this out. I'm not saying socialism is a perfect system. I'm saying there's a reason there are big "Socialist" parties in Europe.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
You have selective amnesia you know. Scroll back to page 2 and you will find your comment when you said, "I'll give you credit for at least looking up the definition of social."
At that time, I did not look up the definition because I had already knew it before I began to speak on it.
FOR YOUR BENEFIT, I looked up the definition like 5 minute ago for in order to give you the definitive definition on the expression "means of production."
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
Why not just admit that you messed up. Your ignorance and arrogance is telling on you.
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
Welfare state programs like Social Security and Medicare are measures to relieve the worst effects of capitalism. Before they were instituted old people were left to starve and die of treatable medical conditions. Only an idiot could claim that the "only harm people in the end."
So the question is "Why would oppose extending these programs to all people?" Why can't a wealthy society like our see to it that everyone has a decent standard of living?
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
To satisfy your ignorance on the topic of socialism and what is meant by the term, "means of production," I found this definition to pass on to you for your benefit-
"Means of production (abbreviated MoP; German: Produktionsmittel), are things used by human labourers to create products. "
Note the two terms "human" and "labourers" in this definition. This point directly to what I have repeatedly stated before. Please confirm this if you like. I got it from wikipedia.
ECE
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
U took offense at something that u inferred into what I said. I didn't say u looked up "socialism" in response to me. Nor were justified in thinking that I had implied such.
But clearly u did (at some point) look up a definition of socialism. Unfortunately u mistook a term of art for a phrase with a straightforward plain English meaning.
Then u try to retain your misunderstanding by effectively claiming "things used by a laborer" can include the laborer herself.
"Things" aren't people.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
And people aren't things. And you know it.
I think it would be a true sign of an ability to learn to allow new facts and new understandings to replace older mistaken views, even if you arrived at your older understandings in a logical manner.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
Look at you fragmenting because you can't stand to be wrong.If I found that I misspoke about something I would admit it and move on,but you can't do that because you are the classic ignorant person. Now you are sitting up here lying about what you said.I wonder whats next,are you going to go back and delete the comment where you gave me accolades because you falsely assumed that I had to look up the definition?
This is sooo simple; Im done for real this time. I will give you the last word
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
Anyone can see that I never claimed that you looked up the def. IN RESPONSE TO ME. U show your lack of civility by accusing me of lying when I pointed out that you inference was unfounded.
Also anyone can see that you're wrong about the meaning of "means of production." Even by your own account it entail "THINGS...used by laborers" not people or labor.
Why not be civil and try learning? Why not be decent and favor extending health care coverage to those not covered by Medicare?
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
We will give you a million bucks in free health care..... and he says "NO NO NO NO NO NO"..... more proof of being unhinged. Pure hatred for a black man in the white house. Total frustration that a black man got into the white house. Oh, they through it would happen someday. BUT NOT SO QUICKLY!! So the New York Times is the Bill??? MORE DELUSION!! UNHINGED!! UNHINGED!!! Now he wants to kill somebody. UNHINGED!!! LISTEN TO HIS UNSUPPORTED RANTS!! Where is he getting this CRAP!!??
TellitToMe100 2 years ago
No it's not!!!!!!!!! Wake up and stop putting your ethnicity in this. This is not about BO ethnicity. U see, this is why the ruling elite prompted this man up as a candidate n funded his campaign enormously!!!!! Hasn't it occurred to you that the racist people who are stance pupils of the eugenics (i.e. ethic cleansing) philosophy is trying to enact blatant eugenics through Barack. Why, because they are using his blackness as a distraction so that ppl like you will not see what is coming...
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
In addition, TellittoMe100,
I would like to say that I think it is rather callous and ignorant on your part to overlook the fact that this man has a handicap son who is CLEARLY threatened under this imposing new bill and automatically assume because the man has white skin he has an issue with being under a black president. That is NOT the issue and I really wish that ignorant black people would stop throwing the race card up in here to justify whites disliking BO's politics...
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
Lastly, Tellit...
Yes, there are some whites and BLACKS who still dont like the idea of being subject to a black person, especially a black man. But you have to be open minded enough to decipher between legitimate criticism like what is being displayed in this clip and when some ignorant high-minded white person dont wanna be subject to a black person. You are thinking the way you have been programmed by the racist white ruling elites want you to think. Many of them are eugenics. Think !!!
EnChristosEime4life 2 years ago
totally unhinged!!!
TellitToMe100 2 years ago
Kudos,Mike!You are a hero.....and your concern for your son is well-founded.Dr.Death,Ezekiel Emanuel is Obummer's advisor and his Nazi policy involves denying care to the handicapped....be they young or old.......saving trillions on the lives of Americans.THese libtards do not care about health or people!!
georgie1 2 years ago 4
This is natural reaction. This is people like me who have experieced 8 years of pure hatred from libs, and then being called racists out of the blue for 2 years during the campaign becuz of a man who went to a racist church, Obama apologizing to the world for our beautiful, righteous country, and now Marxist legislation.
I would love to scream bloody murder right in Barbara Boxer's face, Rahm Emanuel's, Murtha, even McCain for lecturing us about "compassion" towards illegal immigrants.
ShaytanBozorg 2 years ago 4
Yeah obviously compassion is not a virtue!
But more to the point; Where in the world has Obama apologized for the behavior of the US? The answer is of course nowhere. You could easily disprove me by providing a link to a single instance in which Obama tells another country "sorry" or "we apologize" or "we regret..." or something equivalent. You can't because he hasn't apologized to any other country.
Clinton did make two apologies while president. One to Rwanda for doing nothing to stop
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago 2
the genocide of Tutsi. The other to Guatemala for our (US) support for a string of brutal military dictators how slaughtered ca. 200,000 indigenous people in what can only be called a genocide. Both apologies were appropriate.
The basic tone of your comment is that the US does no wrong and that we are motivated by higher ideals than other countries. Only an idiot could hold either of these positions.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago 2
The basic tone of your comment is you're an angry anti-American fuck.
ShaytanBozorg 2 years ago
What a well reasoned response! You're right, I give up. This country is perfect. We never do anything wrong. We're infinitely superior to all other countries and other peoples in every respect especially in terms of ethical values.
But seriously when you're out around thinking adults you should bite your tongue or you'll be embarrassed because you're retarded evil little shit!
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago 2
Also note that you didn't provide any link to any statement where Obama apologizes for the US for ANYTHING. The reason is obvious, you were lying saying that he had gone around apologizing. You make these retarded statements and then you fail to provide a shred of evidence to back them up.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago 2
The chip on your shoulder must be massive.
ShaytanBozorg 2 years ago
why don't you google it douchebag....are you that fucking out of touch that YOU DON"T REMEMBER?!?!?!?!?!? He was all over Europe smacktalking his own country....passively of course!! It was all over the news....all over the internet...all over the radio??? I just googled it and found 889,000 hits on this subject....now who's the retard????????
wildcatkc 2 years ago
Just provide the link to a reliable transcript of him saying anything that constitutes an apology. You can't because he didn't.
Your contention that typing in some search terms and get back results proves your position is retarded. For instance I just googled "Jews were responsible for the holocaust" and I got 47 million results. Does that mean this idea is confirmed?
You have no clue what constitutes proof. I don't even like Obama but it is pathetic that you have to lie about him.
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
And the rest of the world is perfect, you pathetic angry anti-American.
ShaytanBozorg 2 years ago 2
You've essentially admitted that you were lying when you said Obama had gone around the world apologizing for America.
And you've confirmed that when people like yourself call someone "anti-American" what you really mean is someone who admits that the US is not perfect.
My message to you is that the decent people in the US are waking up. When we come across people like you were going to shame you, humiliate you and expose your evil to everyone (and we won't hire you.)
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
No, you're a childish moron who makes elaborate posts to try to make yourself look impressive. Get therapy. You sadly believe you can intimidate people on the anonymous Internet.
ShaytanBozorg 2 years ago
So you've effectively admitted you're a liar. But you're probably such a sociopath that you can't even understand that you're lying.
Also you talk about Obama being a "Marxist" but you've never read anything that Marx wrote. So how the fuck could you know whether he is a Marxist?
fjfjvmvm 2 years ago
"you've effectively" and "you've essentially" and "you've confirmed" -- get a new act. lol
ShaytanBozorg 2 years ago