@max2right Cowardice has nothing to do with my reasons for comment screening. Try READING them on my main channel page. Reading is fundamental, unless you just want to be "mental." lol.
Wat about that verse in Luke where Jesus states: "And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, IT SHALL NOT be forgiven him."
It REALLY, REALLY bothers me to think there is a sin God CANNOT, or will not, forgive...
Blasphemy of the Holy Ghost is when you resist within yourself to promptings of the Holy Ghost. Why God decides not to forgive it perplexes me, and is an insult to HIS shed blood, since ALL sin is the same - ALL sin brings death.
@speerdali Is that right? Well maybe YOU can explain the meaning of the passage in its context? Oh, wait, you don't even know what that word means. LOL.
@guendoloena1 Why do silly people worry so much about ratings and can't deal with the TOPIC of a video with any coherent thought or substantive argument?
I believe that it is crucial when men utter certain words out of some unconventional ignorance but solely based on the malicious INTENTION incorporated in the heart. Would you agree with this interpretation along with the Early Church father's expository, or would you still maintain that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is a rejection of conviction? @CRW
I extensively follow a large portion of the Early Church Fathers' and the Ante Nicene Fathers' theological expository of the Holy Scriptures in light of it's sole context and historic grammatical assimilation and I'm one of the few Christians who would take Matthew 12:31, Mark 3:29, and Luke 12:10 rather seriously and VERY literally (as the Greek text expounds the negation of the "ophethisetai" with the "OUK" after the "agion pneuma blasphemisanti").
... (cont.) while one of the Ante-Nicene fathers who soberly contended against the late heresy of Bishop Sabellius in his writings, confirmed that the Sabellian heretics (who essentially denied the the Trinity) also blasphemed the Holy Spirit by EXCLUDING His Personhood from the Godhead (Theotes)... (cont.)
I'm interested in hearing your take on the Early Church's expository of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit:
"And ye shall not tempt or dispute with any prophet who speaketh in the Spirit; for every sin shall be forgiven, but this sin shall not be forgiven." (Didache 11:7)
Bishop Iraneaus of Lyons also claimed that a man BLASPHEMED the Holy Spirit (committed the unpardonable sin) by applying the Paracletos (Comforter) to a religious sect leader... (cont.)
smart man, thought it was blasphemy at first, till i asked my grandma, then i felt safe, i didnt think it made sense for it to be a sin wondering if god was real, which i do believe he is, thank god for smart ppl like u to clarify things, im 15 so i need clarifying lol, thank god :)
um no you haven't proved anything you have said an argument that was ok "almost" circular which lasted approximately 15 seconds apart from that you use dramatics and you do your laugh and mainly have other people talking making your arguments. Secondly your the christian im the atheist, atheism is no religion it's simple the response to a religion which means you would be the one that needs proof to prove something exists since its hard to disprove something since there is no proof it exsists
@dfrazmabel12 You do know understand what "proof" is. You do not know logic. So of course you will deny anything out of your ignorance of basic reasoning skills. Any college level logician who knows the Bible well will tell you you are wrong. LOL. Take that nonsense elsewhere.
@CRoadwarrior How could you be so confident and so wrong simultaneously? To you get satisfaction from writing the most wrong sentences possible? Your wrongness is astounding? Are you a parody?
@dfrazmabel12 No, I have facts and accurate knowledge of the Bible in context. Neither you nor anyone else has presented a valid argument here disproving anything. So don't sing it...bring it. I've made my point. Now deal with it, or go play. I have facts in my video. You have no facts and you present none in comment. LOL.
wow reviewing the video i notice that ur only argument in pretty much 15 mins of video is a small circular argument which doesnt emcompass the said text that people are denying the existance of god merely you go on about the holy spirit and how to repent. The only person that comes close to responding is the James dude but u barely show him and simply stating that 2 websites can defend all your claims isnt exactly strong now is it?
@dfrazmabel12 No, the argument is not circular. Study some logic. The argument is simple enough and shows that people need to consider context before making up silly challenges. So whether or not you can SEE the strength of the argument is no reflection on my actual argument.
@dfrazmabel I really get a kick out of the most ignorant claims by people like you when you say things like "it's clear you haven't read the bible." I can read it in the original languages...YOU can't. So in actually, it's clear to me that YOU have not really read the Bible.
@Crazyfistthehero So the real cowardly revisionism and hypocrisy comes from those who ONLY find context unimportant when they get to the Bible. Give me a break with that hypocritical foolishness.
@Crazyfistthehero Heyyy, you can be sick of the context issue, but until some of you folks learn what the word means and learn how important that is. Only fools ignore context. And I find it strange that people can understand the importance of context in EVERY other literature, except when it comes to the Bible. When some folks get to the Bible, only then do they get positively stupid. I refuse to allow that nonsense to stand.
there s somethign i dont understand RoadWarrior. Why do you believe, I mean, why did u pick this set of stories (irregardless of whether they are true or not) over the stories that Islam teaches, or Hinduism, or Greek polytheism for that matter. There s no more evidence for one than for the other, the likelihood of beign true is the same for all religions, so why, and HOW do you pick one? -Sincerely, me
@fuckcapitalism666 It is obvious that you have simply assumed your conclusion and done no thorough investigation of the Christian faith as compared to others. You pick one that is the most internally consistent, has the most credible historical, bibliographical, archaeological, scientific, linguistic, and sociological evidence to support it. And that is the Judeo-Christian faith. If you want, I can suggest some books for you to read to help you with the facts.
@CRoadwarrior lol. evidence? there is none. except the bible, which is what im putting to the test... archaeological evidence that Jesus is the son of god, scientific, linguistic? what are you talking about. please be more precise, what books can you suggest?
@fuckcapitalism666 That is the montra of those who have not investigated the evidence, "there is none." Nonsense. There's plenty, if you would but open your eyes. Read "Evidence That Demands a Verdict" by Josh McDowell, "He Who Thinks Has To Believe" by Dr. A.E. Wilder-Smith and "Is the Bible True?" by Jeffery Sheler, and "The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence for an Intelligent Designer" edited by J.P. Moreland. These contain the basics that will help you.
blaspheme is anything that would be disrespectful towards God. saying that someone doesn't exist seems fairly disrespectful to me (even if it's true), so they really are committing blaspheme.
@3070723b Not so. In context, the issue was a specific type of blasphemy. It was not blasphemy in general. So they misread the passage and engaged in foolishness.
@gokebe Ok, so "unfunny" is a word. Doesn't apply to me, but ok. You can debunk a "challenge" if within the "challenge" are certain claims and assumptions which are not true.
@HikariHime29 And Jesus was very confrontational in the Gospels in many instances (Luke 13:32; Matthew 23:27; Matt. 21:12). Apparently you do not read the Bible all that much. Besides, as a Christian Road Warrior, that finger is part of my act. So don't get it twisted. Get the facts.
There is a saying... "If you assume, you will assume wrong." I have read it before PLENTY of times.
If you are trying to show people the error of their way or tring to show them your beliefs, calling them stupid and waving your finger isn't going to do it. It is just going to do the opposite and give people a reason to call Christians crazy.
btw, I take back my initial statement. YOU, sir, are a very confrontation person; not the finger.
@HikariHime29 Your false claim about how not Christian I was in being "confrontational" shows ignorance of Jesus' own confrontational actions. Hence, no assumption here, just a fact based on your false claim. Reading the Bible is one thing, understanding it can be another. Many people, even atheists, have admitted that I know what I'm talking about. So you are not basing your claims on facts but your own misperceptions. I called no one "stupid." I called the "challenge" stupid.
@HikariHime29 And, I might add, you might try listening to what Jesus Himself said instead of making assumptions. I am neither truly "confrontational" or anything else negative you might imagine. So you may want to pay close attention to your own quotation about assumptions.
Lol, I haven't said anything negative about you. I just said you are a confrontational person. It's not negative, it is my personal observation of your character and based of the other user comments on this video, they find that finger and your personality to be confrontational as well. You should take it as a complement since (according to yyou) Jesus was confrontational when teaching.
@HikariHime29 I don't consider myself "confrontational" in the sense most mean it. I do confront false teaching, yes. And I should. So did Jesus and the early apostles. I just choose to use some of my gifts in this way on YouTube as a means to an end. Yes, for now I am single.
@HikariHime29 Figures? Not really. I am single by CHOICE, because most of the women I meet are not my equal spiritually, emotionally, or mentally. I am nowhere near a "Sour Susan." You are mistaking part of my "act" as the Christian Road Warrior as my real personality. LOL.
No, in this case we are talking about the bible, belief, not fact. The God of Abraham, Moses, Noah, Jesus, etc, is not a fact. In fact, more people historically have disbelieved it then believed it.
@normmccabe No, The God of Abraham, Moses, Noah, Jesus is more fact than YOU are. Please. Even IF your claim that more people have disbelieved "it" than have believed it, that claim itself would be a consensus gentium fallacy. So your logic is flawed and you need to do some serious research.
@normmccabe LOL. You have only made a blanket claim based in ignorance. My belief is based on credible facts. Facts you obviously have not taken the time to investigate.
@normmccabe You are dead wrong. Go do some research: "There is a God" by Anthony Flew, "He Who Thinks Has to Believe" by Dr. A.E. Wilder Smith, and "Is the Bible True? by Jeffery L. Sheler.
ritter89. What's even more annoying is the Biblical ignorance that created this "challenge" to being with, and the fact that people still try to prop up the dead horse of the "challenge" when it's been shown to be a fraud and a promotion gimmick.
petepamf. Doesn't surprise me that YOU don't understand that what I bring to the table is much more substantive than most, and that this is not nullified by a pointing finger. ROFL.
LOL roadwarrior ur such a big guy ai, you misquote the bible i prove you wrong then you say you can read it different laguages well why dont you trying getting one them right? You didnt respond to a thing i said and removed my comments you really suck at religion ai? It's clear everyone here is against you why dont u leave with the tiny amount of dignity you still hold
@dfrazmabel Yeah, I'm a big guy in a sense. You claim I misquote the Bible. LOL. You can't prove that. You are no match for the warrior. While I've been busy learning Biblical Hebrew, you've learned no more than the silly claims and beliefs you already have. No, I don't "suck" at religion. I don't leave...people who try to challenge me do because most of the time they have no clue what they're talking about and only have a surface knowledge of the Bible.
@CRoadwarrior People can learn the Bible from Genesis to Revelation and still not get its real meaning. This shows whether a person has the Holy Spirit in his/her life.
That is why we have so much cults like the JW and the Mormons!
hardhead621. What you believe isn't important. What is important is the fact that I do my homework and know what I'm talking about. The Bible does not teach lies. If you make this claim, you need to back it up. Weak minded? Please! You wouldn't know a weak mind if you had a "weak mind detector." LOL. Pride? Please! I think you need to stop making assumptions. Insults? Now you're making things up.
LOL at dfrazmabel. I haven't read the Bible? ROFL...now if that isn't the most ridiculous claim I've heard in a long time, especially since I can not only read the Bible, but I can read it in its original languages. I suggest you take some time in the block zone and learn to READ English.
Trevor10. Yes, debunked. If it went over your head, perhaps try praying for understanding or improving your comprehension of simple truths presented from the Bible.
uccomic. Yes, comment pending approval, because so many folks have no clue how to engage in a civil discussion (which is the REAL joke), and I have valid reasons for screening (not censoring) comments.
So, badpanda84, are you trying to say that the age of a book or volume of books dictates how "relevant" it is? So if an ancient book says 2 +2 = 4, because it's 2000 years old this means we must discard what it says? Nonsense. The words "you shall not murder" are just as relevant today as it was thousands of years ago.
auroradamien. I am not on any drugs. I present the truth in context. The Bible has been "changed" 1000s of times? And who told you that lie? Dan Brown the fiction writer? LOL. You want your 5 min. back? No one forced you to watch. YOU go get it back.
@CRoadwarrior how do you work that one out then ?? i don't have no bible bashing video's when it's clear god, jesus, the tooth fairy, the easter bunny nor santa claus exists. and why are you talking in that strange voice which is clearly put on ??
wink0011. Easy. You have the nerve to criticize me when you have NO vids up and no valid reason to say anything against anything I do. Yet I am "odd"? LOL. Far from it. As for the voice, it's an impersonation.
@CRoadwarrior Of course i have the nerve to criticize. You place a video on YouTube and allow comments to be made, therefore your putting your self in the firing range of the public. Here's a question - if god exists, why does it have so many contradictions within it ??
Well, there is valid criticism and invalid. And yours is not valid. And what do you mean, "if god exists, why does i have so many contradictions within it?" Why does what have so many contradictions within it?
Sometimes it does hurt, but that's ok. Yes, there's lots of delusional nonsense out there, but it's not coming from me. LOL. And as for the entertaining part, there are some atheists who disagree with you on that.
I thought your debunking the blasphemy challenge hear. all I got from that was that you don't agree with them and you think there stupid. I think that was a poor choice of words for your title
@CRoadwarrior OK I get where your coming from, you and your Dr. friend says denying god or jesus is not blasphemy. Websters describes it a little differently though. I'm going with Webster over a grown man who has invisible friends. ( normally I would never take a popshot like that at any one but I figured you took some at us, atheist so why not pop some back)
@ridgetownpimp Problem is, Webster is an English dictionary but the New Testament was orginally written in Greek. So you don't use an English dictionary to understand Greek words. That is logic 101. Second, both me and Dr. White explain that context matters, which the BC people ignored. So you can try to "pop" back, but a pea shooter against a machine gun doesn't work. lol
@CRoadwarrior sorry but that argument dos not hold water, seeing how it is not even a Greek word! blasphemy is derived from the Greek word blasphemia and the French word fame witch is derived from the Latin word fama so as I just showed not a Greek word.
also funny how you don't post my rebuttal for everyone to see
@ridgetownpimp And as for posting your "rebuttal," I'm sure you know what the words "pending approval" mean. lol. But you present no real rebuttal...only an invalid argument that has no basis in any facts found in Scripture.
A wiser man than me once wrote that "Theology is like looking in a celler at night for a black cat that isn't there".
Why are christians annoyed, upset or bothered by the Blasphemy Challenge? Surely if their faith is real it will be up to their god to respond not them?
@Hereticalable And I can see that he was actually a fool who didn't understand theology at all. One of the great things about our God is that He chooses to use ordinary people. So you, like many, proceed from false assumptions, inaccurate knowledge, and misconceptions.
10 years of leading a cell group, teaching bible study and a bit of dabbling in Hebrew and Greek and you say I proceed from false assumptions and inaccurate knowledge...interesting.
26,000 children will die of starvation today...why should this great god of yours answer YOUR prayers?
There is a vast difference between "dabbling" and learning Hebrew and Greek, as anyone who knows the languages will attest. I've been a Christian longer than 10 years. And who told you 26,000 children will die of starvation today? How do you KNOW this? Or do you? God answers my prayers according to His will, as He always has.
True...I admit I am not a scholar of Hebrew or Greek. However I'd bet I know more than you or most people. I speak several European languages too which is also more than you speak no?
Statistics tell me 26,000 children will die today.
How do you know God answers prayers? Did you hear God speak or make an amputee grow a new limb?
To be fair, how can you even know God exists..or more specifically that the God you believe in exists?
Hereticalable. I would not bet you know more of the Biblical languages than I do. And most know that knowing "European" languages is not the same thing as knowing Semetic languages and ancient Greek. How do I know God answers prayer? Over 20 years OF seeing it in my life. It makes sense that if I pray TO the God of the Bible, and He answers, that this God is the one hearing and answering. As for Zeus and Odin, don't see any evidence of their real existence. You have any?
So do you speak any Hebrew or Greek? Do you speak any languages aside from American English?
The UN food program tells me 26,000 children die on average a day from starvation - it's easy to find stats online these days.
You can believe whatever you want, but when you start trying to "prove" it there's a problem...you cannot. It's really that simple. If you had real faith you would not care about proving anything.
Yes, Hereticalable, I speak both Hebrew and Koine Greek (in Modern pronunciation). No, I don't speak any other besides English. You are in error on several ways. You assume that because X amount of children die, that this means something against God answer prayer. Non sequitur. God allows the ravages of sin and death. It doesn't mean He is not there or that He does not care. You also error in thinking faith and prove are mutually exclusive. Nonsense.
First, irregardless is not the proper terminology. It's "regardless." Second, you don't understand Biblical theology if you think our prayers make no difference because God will do His will regardless. That's not what the Bible says.
badpanda84. What do I call it when you pray for someone with cancer and they die anyway? It means God said "no" in that instance. People have been healed also.
badpanda84. As I said before, it simply means God chose not to heal in that instance. However, God has never promised to answer every prayer in the affirmative.
badpanda84. Exactly? Not really. That "if" of yours is a big "if." We do not know if God has already decided anything. So we pray and wait to see what God will do. But we are told to pray and that God does answer, sometimes in the positive, sometimes in the negative. It's not about changing God's mind but falling in line with His will, whatever that might be.
creation=proof of God!
andymcq2509 6 months ago
@yanniskusogaki Heyyy...the warrior can laugh at what he wants! And now I'm laughin at YOU swimming in a pool of Block Zone Zombies.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
SING PURPLE RAIN!!!!!1
CondemnedPatriot 6 months ago
@CondemnedPatriot Sorry...don't sing...but you can sing the blues, though. Block Zone Blues, that its. LOL.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
Your voice destroyed any desire I had to see if you were actually making any valid points.
dunkel25 6 months ago
@dunkel25 That is a very superficial and sad commentary on your lack of sound judgment.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
best satire eva
hypock1 7 months ago
@hypock1 NOT a satire. Learn.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
Excellent point made about the hypocrites/clergy of jesus time. Great delivery too....
brazy321 8 months ago
This video makes me lose some of my hopes for humanity. There really are some stupid people out there that reason can't reach.
sadrequiem 1 year ago
@sadrequiem I just love ad hominem, don't you? LOL.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
this guy is hilarious. great satire video, you make a great point about how stupid some christians sound
hdizdiz14 1 year ago
@hdizdiz14 Sorry but you misunderstand. This is NOT a satire video. Those who sound stupid are those who participated in the "Blasphemy Challenge."
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior Wait, this isn't a sarcastic video? That makes it even more funny! bwahahaha
luisdez81 10 months ago
@luisdez81 Laugh it up, fuzz ball...but the facts can't be defeated! bwahahahahaaaa!
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
the beginning of this video made me LOL.
hdizdiz14 1 year ago
Be interesting to see if " the man" has the guts to approve my comments. Since he's to much a coward to allow ratings
max2right 1 year ago
@max2right Cowardice has nothing to do with my reasons for comment screening. Try READING them on my main channel page. Reading is fundamental, unless you just want to be "mental." lol.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
The "context" part is funny. You are a funny parody of a Christian. It is sad that some can almost be as stupid as this character.
trueleroix 1 year ago
@trueleroix Not a parody, and this "character" is far from stupid.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
Question: I SO BADLY want to believe you BUT...
Wat about that verse in Luke where Jesus states: "And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, IT SHALL NOT be forgiven him."
It REALLY, REALLY bothers me to think there is a sin God CANNOT, or will not, forgive...
wildmanchris200 1 year ago
@wildmanchris200 I have explained this, and so have others. It's very simple. If you reject the Forgiver, you cannot be forgiven.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
Blasphemy of the Holy Ghost is when you resist within yourself to promptings of the Holy Ghost. Why God decides not to forgive it perplexes me, and is an insult to HIS shed blood, since ALL sin is the same - ALL sin brings death.
wildmanchris200 1 year ago
Sorry 'bout that comment, I appreciate your wisdom on this subject.
wildmanchris200 1 year ago
OMG...you are truly the grand buffoon of you tube......
speerdali 1 year ago
@speerdali Is that right? Well maybe YOU can explain the meaning of the passage in its context? Oh, wait, you don't even know what that word means. LOL.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
@speerdali I'd be happy to, however I'm not sure you're worth it! lol!!!!!
speerdali 6 months ago
@speerdali LOL. Nice joke. I'm waiting.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
why do christian wimps block ratings and comments
guendoloena1 1 year ago
@guendoloena1 Why do silly people worry so much about ratings and can't deal with the TOPIC of a video with any coherent thought or substantive argument?
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
I believe that it is crucial when men utter certain words out of some unconventional ignorance but solely based on the malicious INTENTION incorporated in the heart. Would you agree with this interpretation along with the Early Church father's expository, or would you still maintain that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is a rejection of conviction? @CRW
HeresyCrusher 1 year ago
I extensively follow a large portion of the Early Church Fathers' and the Ante Nicene Fathers' theological expository of the Holy Scriptures in light of it's sole context and historic grammatical assimilation and I'm one of the few Christians who would take Matthew 12:31, Mark 3:29, and Luke 12:10 rather seriously and VERY literally (as the Greek text expounds the negation of the "ophethisetai" with the "OUK" after the "agion pneuma blasphemisanti").
HeresyCrusher 1 year ago
... (cont.) while one of the Ante-Nicene fathers who soberly contended against the late heresy of Bishop Sabellius in his writings, confirmed that the Sabellian heretics (who essentially denied the the Trinity) also blasphemed the Holy Spirit by EXCLUDING His Personhood from the Godhead (Theotes)... (cont.)
HeresyCrusher 1 year ago
I'm interested in hearing your take on the Early Church's expository of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit:
"And ye shall not tempt or dispute with any prophet who speaketh in the Spirit; for every sin shall be forgiven, but this sin shall not be forgiven." (Didache 11:7)
Bishop Iraneaus of Lyons also claimed that a man BLASPHEMED the Holy Spirit (committed the unpardonable sin) by applying the Paracletos (Comforter) to a religious sect leader... (cont.)
HeresyCrusher 1 year ago
ROFL I loved this. Great job showing those atheist tards they don't even know what they are doing
woodster2k1 1 year ago
@woodster2k1 Half the time they don't, and what's even worse is that they THINK they do. lol.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
stop pointing at me =(!
hamidder1 1 year ago
@hamidder1 No!
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
lol ur a tard
robvidtime9000 1 year ago
@robvidtime9000 Is that all you got, punk? lol
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
goldberg music..........thumbs just 4 that
waqas1887 1 year ago
smart man, thought it was blasphemy at first, till i asked my grandma, then i felt safe, i didnt think it made sense for it to be a sin wondering if god was real, which i do believe he is, thank god for smart ppl like u to clarify things, im 15 so i need clarifying lol, thank god :)
deondreification 1 year ago
To believe anything in stone age holy books is true takes stupidity.
Hellcat040369 1 year ago
@Hellcat040369 No, the real stupidity is not realizing the truth in the books that even many atheists are smart enough to admit.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
um no you haven't proved anything you have said an argument that was ok "almost" circular which lasted approximately 15 seconds apart from that you use dramatics and you do your laugh and mainly have other people talking making your arguments. Secondly your the christian im the atheist, atheism is no religion it's simple the response to a religion which means you would be the one that needs proof to prove something exists since its hard to disprove something since there is no proof it exsists
dfrazmabel12 1 year ago
@dfrazmabel12 You do know understand what "proof" is. You do not know logic. So of course you will deny anything out of your ignorance of basic reasoning skills. Any college level logician who knows the Bible well will tell you you are wrong. LOL. Take that nonsense elsewhere.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior How could you be so confident and so wrong simultaneously? To you get satisfaction from writing the most wrong sentences possible? Your wrongness is astounding? Are you a parody?
trueleroix 1 year ago
@trueleroix Wrong? Wrong about what? Prove your claims. And no, I am NOT a parody.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
@dfrazmabel12 No, I have facts and accurate knowledge of the Bible in context. Neither you nor anyone else has presented a valid argument here disproving anything. So don't sing it...bring it. I've made my point. Now deal with it, or go play. I have facts in my video. You have no facts and you present none in comment. LOL.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
wow reviewing the video i notice that ur only argument in pretty much 15 mins of video is a small circular argument which doesnt emcompass the said text that people are denying the existance of god merely you go on about the holy spirit and how to repent. The only person that comes close to responding is the James dude but u barely show him and simply stating that 2 websites can defend all your claims isnt exactly strong now is it?
dfrazmabel12 1 year ago
@dfrazmabel12 No, the argument is not circular. Study some logic. The argument is simple enough and shows that people need to consider context before making up silly challenges. So whether or not you can SEE the strength of the argument is no reflection on my actual argument.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@dfrazmabel I really get a kick out of the most ignorant claims by people like you when you say things like "it's clear you haven't read the bible." I can read it in the original languages...YOU can't. So in actually, it's clear to me that YOU have not really read the Bible.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@Crazyfistthehero So the real cowardly revisionism and hypocrisy comes from those who ONLY find context unimportant when they get to the Bible. Give me a break with that hypocritical foolishness.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@Crazyfistthehero Heyyy, you can be sick of the context issue, but until some of you folks learn what the word means and learn how important that is. Only fools ignore context. And I find it strange that people can understand the importance of context in EVERY other literature, except when it comes to the Bible. When some folks get to the Bible, only then do they get positively stupid. I refuse to allow that nonsense to stand.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@hagf73 LOL. You make the warrior laugh. Say hello to my little friend...the block zone.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Are you serious? lol.
ReverendPopeFoxyFox 1 year ago
@ReverendPopeFoxyFox Yeah, seriously funny.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Man, love ur video! Totally agree and I'm with you !
TheMultiBart 1 year ago
i hate when aithiest dont belive in god but cant say who made the big bang or who was there before the big bange...there so stupid
Adro407 1 year ago
tay zonday!
LEGACYjunkie1951 1 year ago
@LEGACYjunkie1951 tay what? I suggest you see an ophthalmologist.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
good stuff man way to know your bible!
Adro407 1 year ago
When will the debunking begin?
Cuythulu 1 year ago
@Cuythulu It did. Guess it went over your head.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
there s somethign i dont understand RoadWarrior. Why do you believe, I mean, why did u pick this set of stories (irregardless of whether they are true or not) over the stories that Islam teaches, or Hinduism, or Greek polytheism for that matter. There s no more evidence for one than for the other, the likelihood of beign true is the same for all religions, so why, and HOW do you pick one? -Sincerely, me
fuckcapitalism666 1 year ago
@fuckcapitalism666 It is obvious that you have simply assumed your conclusion and done no thorough investigation of the Christian faith as compared to others. You pick one that is the most internally consistent, has the most credible historical, bibliographical, archaeological, scientific, linguistic, and sociological evidence to support it. And that is the Judeo-Christian faith. If you want, I can suggest some books for you to read to help you with the facts.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior lol. evidence? there is none. except the bible, which is what im putting to the test... archaeological evidence that Jesus is the son of god, scientific, linguistic? what are you talking about. please be more precise, what books can you suggest?
fuckcapitalism666 1 year ago
@fuckcapitalism666 That is the montra of those who have not investigated the evidence, "there is none." Nonsense. There's plenty, if you would but open your eyes. Read "Evidence That Demands a Verdict" by Josh McDowell, "He Who Thinks Has To Believe" by Dr. A.E. Wilder-Smith and "Is the Bible True?" by Jeffery Sheler, and "The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence for an Intelligent Designer" edited by J.P. Moreland. These contain the basics that will help you.
CRoadwarrior 6 months ago
blaspheme is anything that would be disrespectful towards God. saying that someone doesn't exist seems fairly disrespectful to me (even if it's true), so they really are committing blaspheme.
3070723b 1 year ago
@3070723b Not so. In context, the issue was a specific type of blasphemy. It was not blasphemy in general. So they misread the passage and engaged in foolishness.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior thank God they stil have a chance to be saved
Adro407 1 year ago
@Adro407 Amen.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@socksumi Say hello to my little friend...the Block Zone...LOL.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior
"who strikes fear into the heart of atheists and nonbelievers everywhere" Is that supposed to be a good thing?
Guy you are unfunny
-you had to have an applause track from someone else's audience
And how do you "debunk" a challenge?
One more thing, do you realize you'd be worshiping a different religion had you been born at another time or another place?
gokebe 1 year ago
@gokebe "Is that supposed to be a good thing?" That depends. Good for us, bad for them.
"Guy you are unfunny" Unfunny? Is that even a word? LOL. Anyway, "unfunny" to YOU perhaps, but to others, I crack them up.
"-you had to have an applause track from someone else's audience" Tell me something I don't already know.
"And how do you "debunk" a challenge?"
I just did.
Your last comment was a non sequitur fallacy.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior
yes, unfunny IS a word
debunk: To discredit, or expose to ridicule the falsehood or the exaggerated claims of something
like I said, you can't debunk a challenge
gokebe 1 year ago
@gokebe Ok, so "unfunny" is a word. Doesn't apply to me, but ok. You can debunk a "challenge" if within the "challenge" are certain claims and assumptions which are not true.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
how do i commit blasphemy then? i'll do it. i'll do anything. anything... (bow chicka bow wow)
SheepRCool17 1 year ago
@SheepRCool17 Watch the videos again...lol. Duh.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
That finger is very confrontational. Not very "christian" like, sir.
HikariHime29 1 year ago
@HikariHime29 And Jesus was very confrontational in the Gospels in many instances (Luke 13:32; Matthew 23:27; Matt. 21:12). Apparently you do not read the Bible all that much. Besides, as a Christian Road Warrior, that finger is part of my act. So don't get it twisted. Get the facts.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior,
There is a saying... "If you assume, you will assume wrong." I have read it before PLENTY of times.
If you are trying to show people the error of their way or tring to show them your beliefs, calling them stupid and waving your finger isn't going to do it. It is just going to do the opposite and give people a reason to call Christians crazy.
btw, I take back my initial statement. YOU, sir, are a very confrontation person; not the finger.
Good day, sir.
HikariHime29 1 year ago
@HikariHime29 Your false claim about how not Christian I was in being "confrontational" shows ignorance of Jesus' own confrontational actions. Hence, no assumption here, just a fact based on your false claim. Reading the Bible is one thing, understanding it can be another. Many people, even atheists, have admitted that I know what I'm talking about. So you are not basing your claims on facts but your own misperceptions. I called no one "stupid." I called the "challenge" stupid.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@HikariHime29 And, I might add, you might try listening to what Jesus Himself said instead of making assumptions. I am neither truly "confrontational" or anything else negative you might imagine. So you may want to pay close attention to your own quotation about assumptions.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior,
Lol, I haven't said anything negative about you. I just said you are a confrontational person. It's not negative, it is my personal observation of your character and based of the other user comments on this video, they find that finger and your personality to be confrontational as well. You should take it as a complement since (according to yyou) Jesus was confrontational when teaching.
Are you single?
HikariHime29 1 year ago
@HikariHime29 I don't consider myself "confrontational" in the sense most mean it. I do confront false teaching, yes. And I should. So did Jesus and the early apostles. I just choose to use some of my gifts in this way on YouTube as a means to an end. Yes, for now I am single.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior,
You are single? Figures. And with your current attitude, plan on remaining single. No one likes a Sour Susan, lol. Good day, sir.
HikariHime29 1 year ago
@HikariHime29 Figures? Not really. I am single by CHOICE, because most of the women I meet are not my equal spiritually, emotionally, or mentally. I am nowhere near a "Sour Susan." You are mistaking part of my "act" as the Christian Road Warrior as my real personality. LOL.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
that was good
spookyspook00000 1 year ago
that was good
spookyspook00000 1 year ago
Most christians use "context" to make what seems untrue and irrational in the bible, excusable in their own flawed logic.
normmccabe 1 year ago
normmccabe. The issue is not what "most" Christians use or do. The issue is what are the facts in this particular case.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
No, in this case we are talking about the bible, belief, not fact. The God of Abraham, Moses, Noah, Jesus, etc, is not a fact. In fact, more people historically have disbelieved it then believed it.
normmccabe 1 year ago
@normmccabe No, The God of Abraham, Moses, Noah, Jesus is more fact than YOU are. Please. Even IF your claim that more people have disbelieved "it" than have believed it, that claim itself would be a consensus gentium fallacy. So your logic is flawed and you need to do some serious research.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior There are no facts in God, there is only belief.
normmccabe 1 year ago
@normmccabe LOL. You have only made a blanket claim based in ignorance. My belief is based on credible facts. Facts you obviously have not taken the time to investigate.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@normmccabe You are dead wrong. Go do some research: "There is a God" by Anthony Flew, "He Who Thinks Has to Believe" by Dr. A.E. Wilder Smith, and "Is the Bible True? by Jeffery L. Sheler.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Man, this guy is annoying. That laugh at the end of the humorless statements is really horrid
ritter89 1 year ago
ritter89. What's even more annoying is the Biblical ignorance that created this "challenge" to being with, and the fact that people still try to prop up the dead horse of the "challenge" when it's been shown to be a fraud and a promotion gimmick.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
People who point fingers generally can't be trusted.
Just saying..
petepamf 1 year ago
LOL...and what you are "just saying" makes no sense.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior
Doesn't surprise me you don't understand.
petepamf 1 year ago
petepamf. Doesn't surprise me that YOU don't understand that what I bring to the table is much more substantive than most, and that this is not nullified by a pointing finger. ROFL.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
LOL roadwarrior ur such a big guy ai, you misquote the bible i prove you wrong then you say you can read it different laguages well why dont you trying getting one them right? You didnt respond to a thing i said and removed my comments you really suck at religion ai? It's clear everyone here is against you why dont u leave with the tiny amount of dignity you still hold
dfrazmabel 1 year ago
@dfrazmabel Yeah, I'm a big guy in a sense. You claim I misquote the Bible. LOL. You can't prove that. You are no match for the warrior. While I've been busy learning Biblical Hebrew, you've learned no more than the silly claims and beliefs you already have. No, I don't "suck" at religion. I don't leave...people who try to challenge me do because most of the time they have no clue what they're talking about and only have a surface knowledge of the Bible.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior People can learn the Bible from Genesis to Revelation and still not get its real meaning. This shows whether a person has the Holy Spirit in his/her life.
That is why we have so much cults like the JW and the Mormons!
MrPaulroxx 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior And no I am not referring to you but to them! LOL!
MrPaulroxx 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior The fact that CRW understands the Bible properly shows that the Holy Spirit dwells with him thus giving proper exegesis.
MrPaulroxx 1 year ago
hardhead621. What you believe isn't important. What is important is the fact that I do my homework and know what I'm talking about. The Bible does not teach lies. If you make this claim, you need to back it up. Weak minded? Please! You wouldn't know a weak mind if you had a "weak mind detector." LOL. Pride? Please! I think you need to stop making assumptions. Insults? Now you're making things up.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
LOL at dfrazmabel. I haven't read the Bible? ROFL...now if that isn't the most ridiculous claim I've heard in a long time, especially since I can not only read the Bible, but I can read it in its original languages. I suggest you take some time in the block zone and learn to READ English.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Are you trying to do the William Shatner voice on purpose?
squirrelywrath2 1 year ago
squirrelywrath2. William Shatner? Did I call my self the Captain Kirk Warrior or Christian Road Warrior? You need to clean your ears out...lol.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
There are no gods anyway. So what is your point you muppet?
ooglebydoogleby 1 year ago
oogle...No gods? Yes, but there is one true God. Guess you haven't looked at the evidence.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
talk about taking stuff out of context
crazynuts2006 1 year ago
crazynuts2006. What are you talking about?
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
i cant believe this guy is serious! would be ashamed to call myself christian after watching this....
ratutevita 1 year ago
ratutevita. Obviously you have no clue what true Christianity is and what it's about.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
wow..i cant believe i listened to that.. debunked? u didint say a thing.. nothing made sense
Trevor10 1 year ago
Trevor10. Yes, debunked. If it went over your head, perhaps try praying for understanding or improving your comprehension of simple truths presented from the Bible.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
@CRoadwarrior praying does absolutly nothing
Trevor10 1 year ago
Trevor10. Nonsense.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Ha ha.
"comment pending approval"
Yeah, you're a real bad-ass warrior, huh? Hiding behind censorship.
What a joke.
uccomic 1 year ago
uccomic. Yes, comment pending approval, because so many folks have no clue how to engage in a civil discussion (which is the REAL joke), and I have valid reasons for screening (not censoring) comments.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
please don't try and reproduce, its evident you have a mental disorder which is in all likelihood chromosomal
fender50 1 year ago
fender50..Please don't try to sound like you're intelligent and rational. LoL.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Nice to see someone answering to this random-public-atheistic-attitide which pops up nowadays. Like it was "cool" to decline Jesus and stuff...
RavensysteM 1 year ago
Your entire intro is pure pride. 30 seconds dedicated to the sin of pride.
ristinraccoon 1 year ago
LOL. My entire intro is "wrestling bravado" and has nothing to do with real "pride." Get a clue.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Which brings up "thou shalt not lie"...
ristinraccoon 1 year ago
ristinraccoon. Which brings up "Back up your claims with facts or be sent to the block zone."
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
This guy's voice is awesome.
ColorTheLifeline 1 year ago
the problem with context is - why should we follow a 2000 year ago book. How is a 2000 year old book relvant todays society.
badpanda84 1 year ago
So, badpanda84, are you trying to say that the age of a book or volume of books dictates how "relevant" it is? So if an ancient book says 2 +2 = 4, because it's 2000 years old this means we must discard what it says? Nonsense. The words "you shall not murder" are just as relevant today as it was thousands of years ago.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Rob...You have no point and you don't know the meaning of the word civility. So, bye bye...
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
auroradamien. I am not on any drugs. I present the truth in context. The Bible has been "changed" 1000s of times? And who told you that lie? Dan Brown the fiction writer? LOL. You want your 5 min. back? No one forced you to watch. YOU go get it back.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
your an odd little man
wink0011 2 years ago
wink0011. And you are odder. LOL.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
@CRoadwarrior how do you work that one out then ?? i don't have no bible bashing video's when it's clear god, jesus, the tooth fairy, the easter bunny nor santa claus exists. and why are you talking in that strange voice which is clearly put on ??
wink0011 2 years ago
wink0011. Easy. You have the nerve to criticize me when you have NO vids up and no valid reason to say anything against anything I do. Yet I am "odd"? LOL. Far from it. As for the voice, it's an impersonation.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
@CRoadwarrior Of course i have the nerve to criticize. You place a video on YouTube and allow comments to be made, therefore your putting your self in the firing range of the public. Here's a question - if god exists, why does it have so many contradictions within it ??
wink0011 2 years ago
Well, there is valid criticism and invalid. And yours is not valid. And what do you mean, "if god exists, why does i have so many contradictions within it?" Why does what have so many contradictions within it?
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
thank you as a atheist you made me laugth so hard
albus23 2 years ago
It must hurt to talk like that all the time.
delusional nonsense....not even entertaining
curonevans 2 years ago
Sometimes it does hurt, but that's ok. Yes, there's lots of delusional nonsense out there, but it's not coming from me. LOL. And as for the entertaining part, there are some atheists who disagree with you on that.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
I thought your debunking the blasphemy challenge hear. all I got from that was that you don't agree with them and you think there stupid. I think that was a poor choice of words for your title
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
@ridgetownpimp I did debunk it in two videos. I didn't just say I disagree, I demonstrated WHY they were wrong. Guess you missed that. Hit rewind.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
@CRoadwarrior OK I get where your coming from, you and your Dr. friend says denying god or jesus is not blasphemy. Websters describes it a little differently though. I'm going with Webster over a grown man who has invisible friends. ( normally I would never take a popshot like that at any one but I figured you took some at us, atheist so why not pop some back)
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
@ridgetownpimp Problem is, Webster is an English dictionary but the New Testament was orginally written in Greek. So you don't use an English dictionary to understand Greek words. That is logic 101. Second, both me and Dr. White explain that context matters, which the BC people ignored. So you can try to "pop" back, but a pea shooter against a machine gun doesn't work. lol
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
@CRoadwarrior sorry but that argument dos not hold water, seeing how it is not even a Greek word! blasphemy is derived from the Greek word blasphemia and the French word fame witch is derived from the Latin word fama so as I just showed not a Greek word.
also funny how you don't post my rebuttal for everyone to see
ridgetownpimp 2 years ago
@ridgetownpimp Sorry, but the arguments (plural) do hold up. Meaning is determined by context,and no English dictionary can give you that.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
@ridgetownpimp And as for posting your "rebuttal," I'm sure you know what the words "pending approval" mean. lol. But you present no real rebuttal...only an invalid argument that has no basis in any facts found in Scripture.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
A wiser man than me once wrote that "Theology is like looking in a celler at night for a black cat that isn't there".
Why are christians annoyed, upset or bothered by the Blasphemy Challenge? Surely if their faith is real it will be up to their god to respond not them?
Hereticalable 2 years ago
@Hereticalable And I can see that he was actually a fool who didn't understand theology at all. One of the great things about our God is that He chooses to use ordinary people. So you, like many, proceed from false assumptions, inaccurate knowledge, and misconceptions.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
10 years of leading a cell group, teaching bible study and a bit of dabbling in Hebrew and Greek and you say I proceed from false assumptions and inaccurate knowledge...interesting.
26,000 children will die of starvation today...why should this great god of yours answer YOUR prayers?
Hereticalable 2 years ago
There is a vast difference between "dabbling" and learning Hebrew and Greek, as anyone who knows the languages will attest. I've been a Christian longer than 10 years. And who told you 26,000 children will die of starvation today? How do you KNOW this? Or do you? God answers my prayers according to His will, as He always has.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
True...I admit I am not a scholar of Hebrew or Greek. However I'd bet I know more than you or most people. I speak several European languages too which is also more than you speak no?
Statistics tell me 26,000 children will die today.
How do you know God answers prayers? Did you hear God speak or make an amputee grow a new limb?
To be fair, how can you even know God exists..or more specifically that the God you believe in exists?
What if Zeus or Odin are real?
Hereticalable 2 years ago
Hereticalable. I would not bet you know more of the Biblical languages than I do. And most know that knowing "European" languages is not the same thing as knowing Semetic languages and ancient Greek. How do I know God answers prayer? Over 20 years OF seeing it in my life. It makes sense that if I pray TO the God of the Bible, and He answers, that this God is the one hearing and answering. As for Zeus and Odin, don't see any evidence of their real existence. You have any?
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
So do you speak any Hebrew or Greek? Do you speak any languages aside from American English?
The UN food program tells me 26,000 children die on average a day from starvation - it's easy to find stats online these days.
You can believe whatever you want, but when you start trying to "prove" it there's a problem...you cannot. It's really that simple. If you had real faith you would not care about proving anything.
Hereticalable 2 years ago
Yes, Hereticalable, I speak both Hebrew and Koine Greek (in Modern pronunciation). No, I don't speak any other besides English. You are in error on several ways. You assume that because X amount of children die, that this means something against God answer prayer. Non sequitur. God allows the ravages of sin and death. It doesn't mean He is not there or that He does not care. You also error in thinking faith and prove are mutually exclusive. Nonsense.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
@Hereticalable
OF course the Key word is according to his will
Which really defeats the point of praying since God is going to do his will irregardless of what we say
badpanda84 2 years ago
First, irregardless is not the proper terminology. It's "regardless." Second, you don't understand Biblical theology if you think our prayers make no difference because God will do His will regardless. That's not what the Bible says.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
Well it makes no diffrence. What do you call it when you pray for someone with cancer and they die anyway.
badpanda84 2 years ago
badpanda84. What do I call it when you pray for someone with cancer and they die anyway? It means God said "no" in that instance. People have been healed also.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
@badpanda84 it makes all the difference when the cancer patient goes to heaven and not to hell.
noel720104 1 year ago
Comment removed
badpanda84 2 years ago
badpanda84. As I said before, it simply means God chose not to heal in that instance. However, God has never promised to answer every prayer in the affirmative.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
exactly and if God has already decided that he dosen't want to heal someone then what make you think he is going to change his mind.
badpanda84 2 years ago
badpanda84. Exactly? Not really. That "if" of yours is a big "if." We do not know if God has already decided anything. So we pray and wait to see what God will do. But we are told to pray and that God does answer, sometimes in the positive, sometimes in the negative. It's not about changing God's mind but falling in line with His will, whatever that might be.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
Oh but I can get to same answer "praying to anything"
how about everyone pray to me. I will answer 100% of the time. its either goign to be a yes no or wait. You will just have to wait and see what I do.
that has exactly the same result as praying to God
badpanda84 1 year ago
Not really. Can you give me $40,000 on request? I doubt it.
CRoadwarrior 1 year ago
this is lame
XavierDrake 2 years ago
@XavierDrake So is your response.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
LOL. Say hello to my little friend, the Block Zone.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
1st responce childish
second very christian
XavierDrake 2 years ago
@XavierDrake LOL. And I'm sure you know all about what a "Christian" is based primarily on grand ignorance.
CRoadwarrior 2 years ago
no i mean very christian as in you block people u don't wanna listen to like vfx and htww ect.
XavierDrake 2 years ago