@timespacevector..thanks for that..sounds like good reading. it never hurts to add a new idea to one's mind, and with that idea, evolve a new personal GUT. peace.
@ricantwin Unfortunately at the time of your comment no book without math exists to explain this approach. With a background in physics you can read the comments under read all comments here to get a better understanding.
It's not that different from what SR already has at its disposal. The so-called "timespace" is the same as coordinate time, and the so-called "universal time" doesn't differ from proper time. An Euclidean space is not that different from Minkowski space either, but the positive-definiteness of Euclidean space must be gotten rid of to fit observation, so Euclidean spaces don't really work, unlike Minkowski spaces. So your so-called idea is not a new approach, and more importantly not working.
@drrobertoboogie97 It is a new approach because time is redefined as both a scalar and vector. Clarification of concepts is the focus of this approach. Time is one of the fundamental measures that must be defined with clarity. Your references to time come from differing contexts and different authors. If x, y, and z dimensions all use the parallel ideas of distance and displacement, then Timespace should also use these same ideas of distance and displacement.
@drrobertoboogie97 In regard to "positive-definiteness of Euclidean space must be gotten rid of": This statement is an assimilation to Einstein's theory. The new approach is Euclidean. Einstein's 1905 special theory is based upon 3D space and results in a negative fourth term. This new approach is based upon 4D space. It is tempting to assimilate to popular ideas. See page 20 in the book.
@timespacevector I'm afraid that won't work. If it did, the Lorentz factor would have a plus sign in the term quadratic in velocity, which then turns out to be a disaster because time dilation and length contraction would work backwards, E would be equal to -mc^2, you would easily go to the speed of light and beyond (even acceleratingly, since your mass would drop asymptotically as you get faster), which is really off observation. If you want an appendix, I'll send it as a personal message.
If the x axis represents velocity then I don't understand your description that Alvin "momentarily stops" while at the top of the curve. This x point represents maximum velocity, not rest. Shouldn't Alvin's track be more like a McDonalds double arch? X = 0 at the turning point and at the point of return. Your x axis appears to imply directionality.
@jmoore125 In x-y-z space Alvin "momentarily stops". But, Alvin does not stop in motion along the Timespace dimension! This illustrates, as described in the book, that the state of rest is equivalent to the state of constant speed motion.
no such thing as time.only motion.time is a human invention to describe past, current and future motions. Repititious motions like planetary revolutions and rotations, moon revolutions, even the 52000 year path of the earth around the center of the Milky Way make human time possible. But in reality everything is moving forward/out, nonstop, not reflecting on past.as observers we invented time to sedate ourselves to the unthinkable infinite movement that is independent and non-respective of us..
@lanagual This book presents the simple idea that time, defined as both a scalar and a vector, can clarify ideas about motion. This book asks you to live and think in 4D space. Use of 3D projections from 4D space makes thinking in 4D simple and straight forward.
@diodoubled 3D projections down from 4D space can be visualized by humans with binocular vision. 2D illustrations approximate an illusion of 3D space. Humans blind in one eye, or totally blind, cannot observe 3D space. See Chapter 7: What Does Four-Dimensional Space Look Like?
@WeberBlocks Yes, "time" can have different definitions. Chronologically, these definitions include those of Aristotle, Newton, Minkowski, as well as Universal Time. The evolution of knowledge, however, takes on an evolutionary growth where each new definition embraced by scientific peers is superior to prior definitions.
The fact that every object travels at the speed of c through spacetime is what makes the geometry thus described non-euclidian (in this case minkovsky spacetime). I can't see what is supposed to be the new approach here. It is exactly what Einstein did describe in his theory of special relativity.
@lykofles Time divides into (1) scalar Universal Time and (2) vector Timespace. Misuse of the word, "now," illustrates that current thought is not carefully defining concepts. For example, Minkowski states: Events that happen now can be different from events observed while moving in 3D space. A better definition for "now" in 4D would be the same for everyone in 4D space. This 4D "now" is represented by scalar, Universal Time, nothing but clock frequency. See Chapter 4 in the book.
@Felizais This return to Earth described by authors presents a simplistic description of Einstein's warped three-dimensional space. What is more important about four-dimensional space is that vision is not an option to directly see four-dimensional space. One cannot see warped three-dimensional space. Authors can only illustrate the warping of two-dimensional space. Four-dimensional space is dramatically more complicated than three-dimensional space.
@DeathByRock100 Einstein was no idiot. Your anger, however, can be understood. Sills worked for 15 years to find flaws in this new approach. In 2008 he was paid to write this book.
The reason why time slows down at the c of light, is due to the motion of the particles increases resistance (ohms). The 4th dimension that Einstein spoke about is size increasing and decreasing from gravity and the expansion of energy in space time. The length of space time is infinite, and also the reverse of the size or distance of space time and matter is also infinite.
Ok, somebody explain to me if this were true how would this work on a biologic level? How would it stop cells from aging faster? from your body aging faster? would it slow the creation of new cells? if so would cells last longer?
@obaeyens You say, "both age at the same speed both twins experience time as normal." This is the new concept defined in the book called, Universal Time. You say, "relative to some reference point." However, "points" only exist in 3D space. It is natural to use concepts from 3D space due to our familiarity with them.
@obaeyens The word, point, can be given different definitions in the English language. Point is most often used with three dimensional space. A point usually has a visual definition in 3D geometric space. Human binocular vision is limited to 3D space. Four dimensions is more complicated. A position in 4D space also requires a position in time, now simply called vector Timespace.
@jpsmart59 The words "warped 3D space" and "shortcut through space" are both founded in 3D definition and experience. This new book tries to bring concepts to light that are founded in qualities of 4D definition and experience. In other words, space of higher than three dimensions is not very familiar.
Isn't this just time dilation explained differently. I'm not sure of the significance of this new way of modelling the same thing. Is it more clear to the mathematically inclined? Or is it a case of if you don't get the old explanation, so here's another hope it helps.
@jamesthesane It appears that you are asking, "What is the advantage of the new ideas and approach presented in the book." Physics was created by Newton in 3D space. Physical space is any space where dynamic motion occurs along each of three dimensions. With 4D space (or higher dimensions) this new approach allows for the definition of 4D physical space (or higher). Motion along each dimension provides a parallel to Newton's approach with 3D. This defines the concept of Space.
"ages less" is a wrong description in the video. it should say " lives less". albert experienced much more years that is why he is older. it is not about aging less. both ages at the same speed biologically. just albert lived much more years. alivin is not lucky he just lived much less. STUPID PEOPLE STILL CAN NOT EXPLAIN RELATIVITY AFTER SUCH LONG TIME EINSTEIN PUBLISHED!
@cmd1024 CONSIDER: When Albert and Alvin reunite, did Albert go backward in time and Alvin go forward in time, or neither? After careful consideration, the need for a new definition of time becomes obvious. This new book suggests that time as both scalar Universal Time and vector Timespace provides a simple new approach.
@007bond66 Einstein created the concept of warped three-dimensional space. This results from his use of Reimann geometry in General Relativity. This new book discusses that warped three-dimensional cannot be visualized. Those who try to see warped space cannot.
@TimJSwan89 Only Einstein's approach to time and space uses the concept of relativity. This new approach to time and space does not use the concept of relativity.
@krooked721 Entropy, a measure of disorder, has been described as "time's arrow" within the context of biological evolution. This suggests that time only progresses in one direction. Measurement of entropy is in units of joules per degree Kelvin. The new approach in What Einstein Did Not See redefines time as both a vector of Timespace and a scalar of Universal Time. The measurement of Universal Time should best be in units of seconds, hours and years, not units of entropy.
@ElGatoLoco698 In the xyz projection down from 4D space only Alvin moves. Albert is at rest on Earth. However, in the xyt projection down from 4D space Albert moves faster than Alvin in the direction of time (Timespace). This visual in on the cover of What Einstein Did Not See.
@timespacevector I feel sorry for whomever discovers time travel if it's even possible. It's got to be the most maddening feature of our universe. That being said, post some more crazy time videos. I want to go crazy.
@ElGatoLoco698 Einstein did not use Euclidean geometry. His choice of Reimann geometry, suggested by Minkowski, resulted in the concept of relativity. The concept of relativity is difficult to understand because of many resulting paradoxes. This new book uses only Euclidean geometry. Thus, eliminating the need for the concept of relativity and its paradoxes. It is a new way of examining four dimensional space and higher.
@jianhuayang This new approach to time and space eliminates the concept of relativity and it paradoxes. Yes, it is a new approach, never presented before. It defines four (and higher) dimensional physical space in a new way. Scalar Universal Time is measured the same by all in four and higher dimensions of space.
@hamberg42 so if you're moving fast enough you are gaining kinetic potential? I think this would be because the faster you move the more matter is forced "behind" you...so you are more easily cutting through...space? I probably got that all wrong lol
@Deciblaster Your thinking is limited to xyz space. Imagine the new understanding you would have by examining xyt, xzt, and zyt space beyond xyz space.
@timespacevector believe me, i try! I've just gotten to the point where I truly am learning and stretching my view of reality. I'm a simple old boilermaker by trade, so I do this research and watch videos in my small amounts of off time. But yes, this is my goal at the moment, to be able to observe things in all of their different possibilities and variants...It's exciting to know I'm learning, but very difficult to stay subjective!
@007bond66 You will not find that Einstein defined time as both a vector and a scalar. Just like distance is a scalar and displacement is a vector. Einstein and conventional physics define time limited to a scalar. Minkowski defines time as a "space-time continuum." Others refer to time as an arrow. Still others define time as that measured by clocks.
@nickharvey7 Thanks. Note, this new approach to space and time has little or nothing to do with quantum mechanics, nor the uncertainty principle. This approach is much like Newton's. Motion of particles through space is the dominate idea. However, Newton was limited to three-dimensional space.
I believe the cubic delineation of Alvin as accelerated through the Euclidean precept would begin to appear as a sphere and become more so towards a relative perception of light speed C.
@ryomali The book's new idea that time is both a vector and a scalar does not use Minkowski diagrams. Minkowski presented his ideas in 1908-1909. New ideas can either be assimilated or accommodated. Assimilate means comparing new ideas to what you already know. Accommodate requires you to build new mental structures, i.e. learning new knowledge.
@timespacevector I apologise for my mistake, I was unaware that I was to accept this as a new premise of time and space. You have presented time dilation in a graphical manner which is, I admit, a new representation of this phenomena, however, time cannot occupy a property of a vector and a scalar. As time can only travel on the z axis of your graph, which is simply a vector. The x axis represents a velocity, which is also a vector, the product of which is a vector, please explain your thought.
@ryomali Four different 3D projections from 4D space include: (1) x-y-z, (2) x-y-timespace, (3) y-z-timespace, and x-z-timespace. Distance traveled in timespace would represent amount of aging in meters or miles. Each of the four dimensions x, y, z, and timespace through which particles travel measure scalar time, i.e. Universal Time. That is, Universal Time, measured in seconds and hours, contributes to the measurement of speed in each of the four dimensions.
As he is in the lineage of the Holy Kings of JUDAH, includ. Wise King Solomon & David his father, as well as in the lineage of Christ's mother's husband Joseph.
TESLA is of the Holy Judeo-Levitical lineage,the Holy SEERS who Christianized of SLAVS-SERBS
All this Holy Tech since 1876 +even after Tesla died in 1943, his papers swiped by the US Gov.& translated into HAARP-tesla, Plasma, Scalar, Satellites + space travel, MRI's called Tesla units, wireless+cell phyones, endless...
@wunderwehr i went on that website and there is only one problem with the vandenburg theory. Vandenburg claims the time machine stays in one position. But to travel in time you must move, and your movement is not relative to the objects around you but light itself. nothing else matters except the speed you are moving at. the only reason you even have to move at all is because space and time are tightly bounded together. so you cant move through time without moving through space.
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff.
I'm no physicist, but it seems to be this is very very similar to what Einstein "saw". In fact my teacher gave this "twin space travel" example in high school (10 years ago). How is this new?
(continuation #3) also another point to bare in mind is that any travel on any axis in any direction is subject to the laws of thermodynamics namely entropy resulting in absolute values for the displacement in that axis including time.... so... what happens is your particles (if you want to call them that) go back in time but will act as if they are progressing forward so nothing gets younger and you don't "undo: anything you simply "do" backwards on the axis
@pietrohome i mean i dont know much but do you think a human could stay alive traveling at those speeds anyway? wouldnt you have to make something that would make you not feel the G's to survive? and in doing that wouldnt you cancel the "time travel"? seems to me youre saying youd only be able to see the past since youre catching up to that light but not experience it.
@kenny8331 Try researching anti gravity flight. By rotating super fluids at high velocities a gravitational force that exceeds earths gravity can be created. If an objected is placed within this gravitational force the "g" effect of earths gravity is not felt and that could potentially move at the speed of light. The "g" effect in space is also reduced since the further away from the earths surface you are the less of a "g" effect there is.
@kenny8331 Good to see discussions build from YouTube comments. What's the point of new ideas in What Einstein Did Not See? For the last 100 years physics has used a definition for time that differs little from Aristotle. It is now time for space to be conceptually defined as four-dimensional. Moving through time is not unlike moving through 3-dimensional space. You no longer can walk into a room (a 3-D process), the words volume and density do not have value (a 3-D process), etc.
@timespacevector but didnt aristotle basically say space was 4-d? what are you saying thats different? what that other dude said didnt really make sense either because if you create something with a higher g that earth the fact that the g effect in space is reduced means nothing since youd now be under the influence of the new "super gravity fluid." anyway the g effect alone should slow down time by itself but youd die before it reaches a point where time change would be noticed or maintained
@kenny8331 I think I'm with you on this one....You would eventually reach a point in which your molecules would separate from themselves from the g forces....so you couldn't go fast enough to notice a change in time because our physical matter cannot withstand the force?
allowing matter to back in time is possible but going to the past is impossible. Just like, when you walk down one of the space dimensions you do not leave copies of yourself as you walk. Matter exists in 3 dimensions of space and all of matter travels along the dimension of time and stays in the same time slice as the rest of the matter . Marching along forward in time matter posses 4 coordinates. 3 of space and one of time. if you wished to go back to the past it is not simply as (cont).
(continuation) easy as moving your particles back in time. You would also need to bring every particle back in time and those particles would have to be in the exact same arrangement as they might have been in some past we were trying to visit. I think its asking much to try to re-arrange all of matter to prior states in order to visit the past. So what happens if you manage time move all the matter that constitutes you to a point (t-a(t)) (time now minus - abs time displacement)
(continuation#2) You would find yourself in a place but the rest of matter that you know would still be marching along at t(0). Now you may speculate endlessly about universal echoes in space time perhaps bringing you to an after image of matter at a particular point in time or it could very well be void. but the matter that constitutes some arrangement of the past would be gone.
@smiddy319 Yes, if you travel at top speed in a Ferrari from birth to 70 years old, you will be a few seconds younger than your twin who could not afford the Ferrari. Try buying a spaceship that travels near the speed of light for more dramatic results.
@timespacevector do you have evidence of time travel like i do? Your just another who wants easy money and make up lies as you go along. you might be educated with words but the traveller needs to be strong in the heart and body. As for readers in Einstein's theory of relativity up loaded by alvrgona, einstein don't know anything about time and space,i;ve corrected how to time travel through time and space in that page and i brought so much evidence of my IMAGE through time and space.
let me put it this way , if i invented the time machine and went back in time and killed my self before i invented the time machine that means the time machine wasnt built at all so how could i have gone back in time and killed my self , will it cause a time loop and time will really get messed up ?
@1998anirudh Inventing a time machine assumes technology can change the nature of time and space. This new book redefines the nature, or science, of time and space. Assumptions in science play a major role in the development of new science concepts such as scalar Universal Time and vector Timespace.
@DKshad0w "Fame of reference" implies that you are in 3D space. When you think and describe invisible 4D space, you use scalar "Universal Time" that exists for all clocks in a 4D physical space. In physical space particles move through each space dimension. Remember, motion through time is not visible compared to visible motion through x-y-z, 3D-space. And, remember motion through 4D space is not visible.
@twide1337 The Michelson-Morley experiment only addressed the existence of ether. Since the light beam in this experiment traveled at the same speed in all directions, they (MM) concluded that ether was non-existent and that light speed is constant. This experiment never considered time as a concept to study. Einstein said that 100K experiments cannot prove Einstein's theory right, it only takes one experiment to prove it wrong. This new book presents a new paradigm where time is redefined.
@jazmanjef Once you study the complexities of Einstein's theory you will see how this new method simplifies time and space with geometry you learn in high school. Einstein did not create the idea of time as the fourth dimension. This book also defines time as a fourth road to the three roads of 3D space. Just imagine when television screens someday present FOUR DIMENSIONAL movies ! And, you can see time travel !
@hanisafi4 After you struggle to learn Einstein's approach to time, space, and time travel, you will hopefully find this approach simple. Redefining time is the trick making this approach so easy to understand.
@MathDoobler You missed the point. Read the book. The math in this book is no harder than algebra. Four-dimensional space can be described with simple algebra! There is no need for tensor math.
@timespacevector Have you ever worked in AREA51? have you ever time travel? I haven't seen the vid of the ad cause my speed to the internet is slow so i'm going to skip what this vid has to offer in time and space,my speed will go back up in 2 weeks by then i would able to watch the whole thing about your claims in time and space,if i see what wrong i'll explian its its wrong or right,because NO1 KNOWS time and space like i do.
@waynnart The complex four-dimensional nature, or science, of time and space limits time travel. This new approach to time and space uses simple algebra, Euclidean geometry, and new definitions of vector Timespace and scalar Universal Time. Time can be considered both vector and scalar.
@BeamSurfer This is the common argument of philosophers. Visit your young grandfather and tell him he is not marrying a nice girl. Check out the book. You will discover where time can reverse direction.
@timespacevector look time travel is very dangerous , I'm the literal guy who takes things clear cut, to me travelling even in 1000 BC and just by simply "Existing", "breathing" or "Standing" in an seemingly isolated area from that time would change the present completely for the very insignificant thing i do, and if you wanna visit a city in the past that's gonna change the future so much that even if you talk to no one , you can change everything by simply occupieng space .
@BeamSurfer Well you're wrong one can only time travel into the future and even then they're not really time travelling but to an observer they are. Also if you could alter the past, which you can't, everything would be the same because time would loop therefore you would need to time travel back to kill Austrolapithecus but if you went back in time and destroyed Austro... then you wouldn't be around in the future to travel back thus you never travelled back so austro... would still be alive.
i am 11 years old this is correct yes but we don't know the exact cause sure it takes longer to get to that point and stuff i get it but can't explain it we can not time travel whith out knowing the cause of time it is like trying to add whith out numbers we can not be sure of the outcomes and thereires
the speed of light or darkness is nothing compared to the ultimate speed of thought ,if a supernatural body just projects a thought to be on the other side of the known universe then you are there in an instant ! Think and you are there !
Interesting theory, which only works if Time is considered as a fourth spatial dimension. Minkowski performed this mathematical trick by multiplying Time in seconds by the speed of light. Seconds cancel out, giving each second a "length" of 2.99792458 x 10^8 meters or 186,282.397 miles. The real Universe consists of three spatial dimensions, the familiar x, y, and z axes. Time exists so that things can happen in our 3-dimensional Universe.
@SuperMagnetizer Vector timespace (in meters), as well as scalar universal time (in seconds), together redefines time in "What Einstein Did Not See." The term, timespace, is not a simple juxtaposition of Minkowski's space-time continuum. Timespace was chosen to honor Minkowski's 1909 work. Timespace defines the 4th dimension in 4D physical space where particles move through each space dimension. Universal time (in seconds) measures motion in each dimension. 4D physical space is not 3D space
so according to this the best way of "time travel" would be to fall into a black hole. but isnt there a problem...how do you get out of the black hole if the gravitational pull of it is so strong it doesnt let light escape. you would have to go faster than light to get out. i dont see how thats possible.
@xxgleexx Note, you are using x-y-z, space. X-y-z space is one of four space projections from 4D physical space: x-y-z, x-y-t, x-z-t, and y-z-t. If you want to discuss forces on you as you fall into a black hole, then you are limiting yourself to the x-y-z, 3D space projection. Note: terms like volume, inside, and center are also limited to the x-y-z space projection.
Simply because "Light-Speed" isn't a measure of Time. It's a measure of distance! It's how far light can travel in a given length of time; D=(VT) Where D is the total distance traveled, V=Velocity and T=Time spent traveling at velocity V.
See? Einstein used light speed because it's a constant and doesn't change (much). So with 1 constant in the equation, all other unknown values can be more easily figured. Light-speed is always confused for velocity
@DrGoodwrench64 Time can be redefined into a Timespace dimension (meters) as well as a scalar measure of Universal Time (seconds). One-light-year is distance (meters) traveled in 3D space. If Timespace is the fourth dimension, then one-light-year could also be the distance (meters) of aging. Einstein did not see time as a dimension. Nor did he have a symbol for differing speeds thru time. Chapt 6 shows that contraction of Timespace is time dilation. Now speed thru Timespace has a symbol.
I can kinda see what you're getting at. But, I think Einstein DID see Time as a being a dimension. He thought there could exist up to 8 dimensions, Time being one of them. He got hung up on his own theory of Relativity. What he couldn't (or wouldn't) see is that his theory of Relativity was flawed by the thought of light being the fastest thing in the Universe. He never even considered the speed of Darkness (which is faster than Light).
@DrGoodwrench64 Einstein did not consider space's fourth dimension until his math professor's (Minkowski's) paper Raum & Zeit (Space & Time) was published in 1909. For a few years Einstein referred to Minkowski's work, but after several years passed, higher space dimensions are usually and improperly accredited to Einstein. Today physicists in superstring theory will use eleven-dimensional space.
@DrGoodwrench64 SPEED OF DARKNESS??? Consider electricity. Ionized air moves with the lightning bolt (direction of electric current). High speed photography in the mid 20th Century showed electrons moving in the opposite direction. Positive protons bound in the nuclei of the ionized air do not move. Speed of a particle of mass defines speed measurement. The particle of light is the photon. When the particle of dark energy is discovered, then its speed might be the speed of darkness. :)
Dark Energy??? I never said anything about Dark Matter or Dark Energy. I meant Dark. As in, the absence of light. The speed at which light is overcome by Darkness is whats called the Speed of Dark. And it's faster than the Speed of Light. Tesla's wireless energy transmission system used ground-waves that traveled at 320,000+ Mi\s. Almost double Light speed.
See, in order for this theory to work, you have to accept that Light Speed ISN'T the fastest thing in the Universe.
@badfall07 As for time reversal, the easiest way to reach the speed of light is falling into a black hole. When you reach the speed of light, however, your watch is observed to stop. Does this mean you stop falling? Does this mean time will reverse direction? This means you have reached the edge of space called the event horizon. Beyond this no events can be observed according to Einstein. In What Einstein Did Not See, time reverses direction. 4D space is a superior way to describe space.
Problem is, that long before you get to the "Stop" point, you've already been crushed to the size of an atom and you're dead. Time travel can't help you now.
So, falling into a Black hole may be the fastest way to get to the speed of light, but it's the dumbest way as well.
But, lets say you could, as in this video, both parties experience the passage of time as they normally would, in a Linear fashion. So, you wouldn't observe time slowing at all. To you, time moves as usual.
@ipwnedurchat Einstein knew that the speed of light is the top speed in space. For example, if you light a match and then travel quickly to somewhere in 3D space, you could see yourself light the match as if going backwards in time. Einstein introduced that the better limit to space is not infinity, but the speed of light itself. Minkowski showed 4D space best explains this new limit. This new book is easier because it uses Euclidean geometry rather than 4D spherical geometry.
@robertlewisvazquez Choose from two types of time travel: 1) Aging at different rates. 2) Time reversal. TYPE 1: Acquire a nuclear rocket engine that accelerates you to 0.8 c in one year. Take a trip out and back to Earth for a total of 40 years on your watch. Use one-year accelerations and decelerations (to turn around and stop). When you return to Earth your spouse ages 70 years! Conflict in watches is different 4D TIMESPACE DISPLACEMENTS in meters. TYPE 2: Enter a black hole & die.
@robertlewisvazquez Everyone now experiences time travel at different rates. Astronauts returning to Earth from the space station are minutes younger than when they started. It is rumored, however, that NASA has a nuclear-powered engine than can accelerate to 0.8 c in one year! More important: Will you have enough food to eat on a 40-year long trip? :)
But the reverse must also be true - so when returning towards the second stationary clock time MUST therefore speed up - its only the photons of light observd which are appearing to either slow or speed up as the travelling observer moves away at say light speed each photon takes longer to get there - this calcualtion does not make sense - even Einstien admitted it was flawed - but it was only a theory
@kisslite In this argument, one tries to logically perceive what one will view from a moving object. This type of thought uses space limited to three dimensions. This 3D space is experienced by Earth creatures who move very slow. Universal Reference Frames, introduced in What Einstein Did Not See, are any reference frame where one's own motion cannot be observed or considered. Four-dimensional physical space has no visual qualities. Just as time has no visual qualities.
This is just another ad to sell a book. If not, then the graphs have to be more definitive. It goes so fast that this ad itself goes faster than the speed of light.
there is a problem with this. If velocity through space affects velocity through time, but an event is defined by 3 spacial and 1 time dimensions, then if I said, meet me at such and such location at 3:00, wouldn't we miss each other since the stationary person would reach 3:00 later? Unless we are all on our own independent timelines, we would not be able to observe time offsets on atomic clocks travelling at different speeds, according to this hypothesis.
@EverythingZen14 In this new approach scalar Universal Time is measured in seconds for all in Universal Reference Frames. Four dimensional PHYSICAL space does not use 3D concepts. Timeline is a concept from Minkowski & Einstein relativity where time is limited to a scalar and physical space is 3D. Universal Time of 3:00 would be in agreement with all who specify scalar Universal Time in seconds. The amount of vector Timespace (meters) necessary to meet could be different for each traveler.
If you have a spaceship traveling at just under the speed of light, say 25 mph less, and a housefly flies from the rear of the ship to the front at 30 mph, is the fly traveling at superlumious speed? Particles traveling FTL in a given medium will cause a blue glow indicative of Perendev Radiation. The key here is that light travels at different speeds in different mediums. The Interstellar Matrix is a medium not a perfect vacuum. What is the speed of light thru the IM?
@SeriousNot See p 5 of What Einstein Did Not See. One's speed will never exceed the speed of light because one moves in a moving reference frame. Einstein's 1905 Special Relativity paper also presented the same result that appears on p 5. / Another unrelated idea is the variation of the speed of light in differing mediums. You also ask if there exists an absolute value for the speed of light. All speeds measure from Universal Reference Frames. 4D-PHYSICAL SPACE is unlike any 3D space.
@SeriousNot A passenger in the Concord Jet casually sips tea as the jet moves faster than the speed of sound. If the jet windows are opaque, ask the passenger, "Are you at rest?" The response: "I am sitting at rest, drinking tea." IF A PERSON CANNOT SEE ONE'S OWN MOTION, THEN THE PERSON IS AT REST. Earth rotates, Earth revolves about the Sun, and Earth moves with the solar system in a rotating galaxy that can collide with another. You, the reader, are at rest in a Universal Reference Frame.
@timespacevector..thanks for that..sounds like good reading. it never hurts to add a new idea to one's mind, and with that idea, evolve a new personal GUT. peace.
lanagual 2 weeks ago
@lanagual The reading is challenging and requires slow consideration. Good luck and enjoy.
timespacevector 2 weeks ago
This is one "needy" video. =p
dwightpaul25 1 month ago
@ricantwin Unfortunately at the time of your comment no book without math exists to explain this approach. With a background in physics you can read the comments under read all comments here to get a better understanding.
timespacevector 1 month ago
Minkowski space is pretty neat.
wesselbindt 2 months ago
This vid is popular on Turkey
lopezjackie515 2 months ago
It's not that different from what SR already has at its disposal. The so-called "timespace" is the same as coordinate time, and the so-called "universal time" doesn't differ from proper time. An Euclidean space is not that different from Minkowski space either, but the positive-definiteness of Euclidean space must be gotten rid of to fit observation, so Euclidean spaces don't really work, unlike Minkowski spaces. So your so-called idea is not a new approach, and more importantly not working.
drrobertoboogie97 2 months ago
@drrobertoboogie97 It is a new approach because time is redefined as both a scalar and vector. Clarification of concepts is the focus of this approach. Time is one of the fundamental measures that must be defined with clarity. Your references to time come from differing contexts and different authors. If x, y, and z dimensions all use the parallel ideas of distance and displacement, then Timespace should also use these same ideas of distance and displacement.
timespacevector 1 month ago
@timespacevector The vector is the (t,x,y,z) vector. The scalar is the norm of said vector. No new concepts here, just new fangled names.
drrobertoboogie97 1 month ago
@drrobertoboogie97 In regard to "positive-definiteness of Euclidean space must be gotten rid of": This statement is an assimilation to Einstein's theory. The new approach is Euclidean. Einstein's 1905 special theory is based upon 3D space and results in a negative fourth term. This new approach is based upon 4D space. It is tempting to assimilate to popular ideas. See page 20 in the book.
timespacevector 2 weeks ago
@timespacevector I'm afraid that won't work. If it did, the Lorentz factor would have a plus sign in the term quadratic in velocity, which then turns out to be a disaster because time dilation and length contraction would work backwards, E would be equal to -mc^2, you would easily go to the speed of light and beyond (even acceleratingly, since your mass would drop asymptotically as you get faster), which is really off observation. If you want an appendix, I'll send it as a personal message.
drrobertoboogie97 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
drrobertoboogie97 2 months ago
Very good video.
1ndranil 2 months ago
If the x axis represents velocity then I don't understand your description that Alvin "momentarily stops" while at the top of the curve. This x point represents maximum velocity, not rest. Shouldn't Alvin's track be more like a McDonalds double arch? X = 0 at the turning point and at the point of return. Your x axis appears to imply directionality.
jmoore125 3 months ago
@jmoore125 In x-y-z space Alvin "momentarily stops". But, Alvin does not stop in motion along the Timespace dimension! This illustrates, as described in the book, that the state of rest is equivalent to the state of constant speed motion.
timespacevector 1 month ago
Interestig presentation timespacevector. Simple and clean explanation.
Good work.
KingAtlas4200 3 months ago
no such thing as time.only motion.time is a human invention to describe past, current and future motions. Repititious motions like planetary revolutions and rotations, moon revolutions, even the 52000 year path of the earth around the center of the Milky Way make human time possible. But in reality everything is moving forward/out, nonstop, not reflecting on past.as observers we invented time to sedate ourselves to the unthinkable infinite movement that is independent and non-respective of us..
lanagual 3 months ago
@lanagual This book presents the simple idea that time, defined as both a scalar and a vector, can clarify ideas about motion. This book asks you to live and think in 4D space. Use of 3D projections from 4D space makes thinking in 4D simple and straight forward.
timespacevector 1 month ago
Huh?
UrukEngineer 3 months ago
what are the 4 dimensions for when the graphic is in 2 dimensions only ?!
diodoubled 3 months ago
@diodoubled 3D projections down from 4D space can be visualized by humans with binocular vision. 2D illustrations approximate an illusion of 3D space. Humans blind in one eye, or totally blind, cannot observe 3D space. See Chapter 7: What Does Four-Dimensional Space Look Like?
timespacevector 3 months ago
Time itself does not exist. It is a fabrication of the human mind. This fabrication make him believe to understand his world.
WeberBlocks 4 months ago
@WeberBlocks Yes, "time" can have different definitions. Chronologically, these definitions include those of Aristotle, Newton, Minkowski, as well as Universal Time. The evolution of knowledge, however, takes on an evolutionary growth where each new definition embraced by scientific peers is superior to prior definitions.
timespacevector 3 months ago
Steven Hawking saw this.
MrL1berty 4 months ago
The fact that every object travels at the speed of c through spacetime is what makes the geometry thus described non-euclidian (in this case minkovsky spacetime). I can't see what is supposed to be the new approach here. It is exactly what Einstein did describe in his theory of special relativity.
lykofles 4 months ago
@lykofles Time divides into (1) scalar Universal Time and (2) vector Timespace. Misuse of the word, "now," illustrates that current thought is not carefully defining concepts. For example, Minkowski states: Events that happen now can be different from events observed while moving in 3D space. A better definition for "now" in 4D would be the same for everyone in 4D space. This 4D "now" is represented by scalar, Universal Time, nothing but clock frequency. See Chapter 4 in the book.
timespacevector 3 months ago
One question... If your speeding through space won't you have to return to Earth?
Felizais 4 months ago
@Felizais This return to Earth described by authors presents a simplistic description of Einstein's warped three-dimensional space. What is more important about four-dimensional space is that vision is not an option to directly see four-dimensional space. One cannot see warped three-dimensional space. Authors can only illustrate the warping of two-dimensional space. Four-dimensional space is dramatically more complicated than three-dimensional space.
timespacevector 3 months ago
EINSTEIN WOULD HAVE SEEN IT, YOUR MAKING IT SEEM AS IF HE WAS AN IDIOT
DeathByRock100 4 months ago
@DeathByRock100 Einstein was no idiot. Your anger, however, can be understood. Sills worked for 15 years to find flaws in this new approach. In 2008 he was paid to write this book.
timespacevector 4 months ago in playlist Liked
The reason why time slows down at the c of light, is due to the motion of the particles increases resistance (ohms). The 4th dimension that Einstein spoke about is size increasing and decreasing from gravity and the expansion of energy in space time. The length of space time is infinite, and also the reverse of the size or distance of space time and matter is also infinite.
76BlueLions 4 months ago
Ok, somebody explain to me if this were true how would this work on a biologic level? How would it stop cells from aging faster? from your body aging faster? would it slow the creation of new cells? if so would cells last longer?
JordanWilde 4 months ago
@JordanWilde Theory of relativity is not intuitive since we have nothing to compare to in real live.
Cells do not age slower or faster, both age at the same speed both twins experience time as normal.
The only difference is that the fastest moving twin relative to some reference point takes a short cut and gets there in a shorter distance.
obaeyens 4 months ago
@obaeyens You say, "both age at the same speed both twins experience time as normal." This is the new concept defined in the book called, Universal Time. You say, "relative to some reference point." However, "points" only exist in 3D space. It is natural to use concepts from 3D space due to our familiarity with them.
timespacevector 4 months ago
@timespacevector
I think points can exist in any number of dimensions and is not limit to 3D.
obaeyens 4 months ago
@obaeyens The word, point, can be given different definitions in the English language. Point is most often used with three dimensional space. A point usually has a visual definition in 3D geometric space. Human binocular vision is limited to 3D space. Four dimensions is more complicated. A position in 4D space also requires a position in time, now simply called vector Timespace.
timespacevector 4 months ago in playlist Liked
@JordanWilde
One key in understanding this is when you realize that in maths they use c x t as fourth dimension.
c = speed of light (speed) multiply by t this equals to distance. If you use ct as unit of distance then you get teh 4 dimension [x, y, z, ct]
It is not intuitive since you do not live in a world where extreme speed differences are normal except in GPS satellites. But not at a human level.
obaeyens 4 months ago
@JordanWilde See comments from and to Jamesthesane.
timespacevector 4 months ago
Gravity can warp space and time thus making it a shortcut through space
that eliminates those light-years! By using gravity-amplifiers and element 115
that is bombarded by a particle accelerator to produce element 116. This is alien
technology! Lazaar explains it better than I do.
jpsmart59 4 months ago
@jpsmart59 The words "warped 3D space" and "shortcut through space" are both founded in 3D definition and experience. This new book tries to bring concepts to light that are founded in qualities of 4D definition and experience. In other words, space of higher than three dimensions is not very familiar.
timespacevector 4 months ago
Einstein and his brother never left the present so no one traveled in time because you can't the Present is all that there is.
13sam31 5 months ago
Isn't this just time dilation explained differently. I'm not sure of the significance of this new way of modelling the same thing. Is it more clear to the mathematically inclined? Or is it a case of if you don't get the old explanation, so here's another hope it helps.
jamesthesane 5 months ago
@jamesthesane It appears that you are asking, "What is the advantage of the new ideas and approach presented in the book." Physics was created by Newton in 3D space. Physical space is any space where dynamic motion occurs along each of three dimensions. With 4D space (or higher dimensions) this new approach allows for the definition of 4D physical space (or higher). Motion along each dimension provides a parallel to Newton's approach with 3D. This defines the concept of Space.
timespacevector 4 months ago
Thanks. I'm as confused as ever.
leafyutube 5 months ago
This is not time travel.. it's time lag.
CelestialAmbassidor 5 months ago
"ages less" is a wrong description in the video. it should say " lives less". albert experienced much more years that is why he is older. it is not about aging less. both ages at the same speed biologically. just albert lived much more years. alivin is not lucky he just lived much less. STUPID PEOPLE STILL CAN NOT EXPLAIN RELATIVITY AFTER SUCH LONG TIME EINSTEIN PUBLISHED!
cmd1024 5 months ago
@cmd1024 CONSIDER: When Albert and Alvin reunite, did Albert go backward in time and Alvin go forward in time, or neither? After careful consideration, the need for a new definition of time becomes obvious. This new book suggests that time as both scalar Universal Time and vector Timespace provides a simple new approach.
timespacevector 5 months ago
@007bond66 Einstein created the concept of warped three-dimensional space. This results from his use of Reimann geometry in General Relativity. This new book discusses that warped three-dimensional cannot be visualized. Those who try to see warped space cannot.
timespacevector 5 months ago
@TimJSwan89 Only Einstein's approach to time and space uses the concept of relativity. This new approach to time and space does not use the concept of relativity.
timespacevector 5 months ago
all just fancy word and number play to represent looking at two events and making a connection. life is entropy, sub molecular misanthropy.
krooked721 6 months ago
@krooked721 Entropy, a measure of disorder, has been described as "time's arrow" within the context of biological evolution. This suggests that time only progresses in one direction. Measurement of entropy is in units of joules per degree Kelvin. The new approach in What Einstein Did Not See redefines time as both a vector of Timespace and a scalar of Universal Time. The measurement of Universal Time should best be in units of seconds, hours and years, not units of entropy.
timespacevector 5 months ago
Basic physics ,,,,,Time = Distance / Speed
amulla86 6 months ago
Oh, I see. You're saying Alvin doesn't actually travel faster than Albert?
ElGatoLoco698 6 months ago
@ElGatoLoco698 In the xyz projection down from 4D space only Alvin moves. Albert is at rest on Earth. However, in the xyt projection down from 4D space Albert moves faster than Alvin in the direction of time (Timespace). This visual in on the cover of What Einstein Did Not See.
timespacevector 5 months ago
@timespacevector I feel sorry for whomever discovers time travel if it's even possible. It's got to be the most maddening feature of our universe. That being said, post some more crazy time videos. I want to go crazy.
ElGatoLoco698 5 months ago
I found this video confusing. Are you suggesting Einstein was wrong? Or are you confirming Einstein using Euclidian geometry?
ElGatoLoco698 6 months ago
@ElGatoLoco698 Einstein did not use Euclidean geometry. His choice of Reimann geometry, suggested by Minkowski, resulted in the concept of relativity. The concept of relativity is difficult to understand because of many resulting paradoxes. This new book uses only Euclidean geometry. Thus, eliminating the need for the concept of relativity and its paradoxes. It is a new way of examining four dimensional space and higher.
timespacevector 5 months ago
希望这个水可以翻译一下,有中文版本的就好了
jianhuayang 7 months ago
形象 直观 讲的好
jianhuayang 7 months ago
@jianhuayang This new approach to time and space eliminates the concept of relativity and it paradoxes. Yes, it is a new approach, never presented before. It defines four (and higher) dimensional physical space in a new way. Scalar Universal Time is measured the same by all in four and higher dimensions of space.
timespacevector 5 months ago
space is nothing but kinetic potential and time
as an object exploits the kinetic potential of space it experiences less time.
when an object yields kinetic potential to space it experiences more time.
someone smart do something with this.
hamberg42 8 months ago
@hamberg42 so if you're moving fast enough you are gaining kinetic potential? I think this would be because the faster you move the more matter is forced "behind" you...so you are more easily cutting through...space? I probably got that all wrong lol
Deciblaster 6 months ago
@Deciblaster Your thinking is limited to xyz space. Imagine the new understanding you would have by examining xyt, xzt, and zyt space beyond xyz space.
timespacevector 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timespacevector believe me, i try! I've just gotten to the point where I truly am learning and stretching my view of reality. I'm a simple old boilermaker by trade, so I do this research and watch videos in my small amounts of off time. But yes, this is my goal at the moment, to be able to observe things in all of their different possibilities and variants...It's exciting to know I'm learning, but very difficult to stay subjective!
Deciblaster 5 months ago
@hamberg42 New ideas are the product of different human thought. You should be the best one to explain your new idea.
timespacevector 5 months ago
@007bond66 You will not find that Einstein defined time as both a vector and a scalar. Just like distance is a scalar and displacement is a vector. Einstein and conventional physics define time limited to a scalar. Minkowski defines time as a "space-time continuum." Others refer to time as an arrow. Still others define time as that measured by clocks.
timespacevector 8 months ago
Interesting video! I am an artist on YouTube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time
This theory is based on just two simple postulates
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event
nickharvey7 8 months ago
@nickharvey7 Thanks. Note, this new approach to space and time has little or nothing to do with quantum mechanics, nor the uncertainty principle. This approach is much like Newton's. Motion of particles through space is the dominate idea. However, Newton was limited to three-dimensional space.
timespacevector 8 months ago
she sounds like the lady from half life 1
jaggernutox 8 months ago
[Comment removed by Albert Eintsein]
123maxgarcia 8 months ago
damn nature you scary
craponyourtube 8 months ago 2
@craponyourtube Nature, ie space and time, is less scary when you understand that ideas about space and time are just thoughts of other human beings
timespacevector 8 months ago
I believe the cubic delineation of Alvin as accelerated through the Euclidean precept would begin to appear as a sphere and become more so towards a relative perception of light speed C.
rollingcube 8 months ago
@rollingcube A very interesting idea worth thinking about.
timespacevector 8 months ago
I'm sorry but this is wrong. Minkovski diagrams should not be represented this way
ryomali 9 months ago
@ryomali The book's new idea that time is both a vector and a scalar does not use Minkowski diagrams. Minkowski presented his ideas in 1908-1909. New ideas can either be assimilated or accommodated. Assimilate means comparing new ideas to what you already know. Accommodate requires you to build new mental structures, i.e. learning new knowledge.
timespacevector 8 months ago
@timespacevector I apologise for my mistake, I was unaware that I was to accept this as a new premise of time and space. You have presented time dilation in a graphical manner which is, I admit, a new representation of this phenomena, however, time cannot occupy a property of a vector and a scalar. As time can only travel on the z axis of your graph, which is simply a vector. The x axis represents a velocity, which is also a vector, the product of which is a vector, please explain your thought.
ryomali 8 months ago
@ryomali Four different 3D projections from 4D space include: (1) x-y-z, (2) x-y-timespace, (3) y-z-timespace, and x-z-timespace. Distance traveled in timespace would represent amount of aging in meters or miles. Each of the four dimensions x, y, z, and timespace through which particles travel measure scalar time, i.e. Universal Time. That is, Universal Time, measured in seconds and hours, contributes to the measurement of speed in each of the four dimensions.
timespacevector 8 months ago
TESLA saw it all.
As he is in the lineage of the Holy Kings of JUDAH, includ. Wise King Solomon & David his father, as well as in the lineage of Christ's mother's husband Joseph.
TESLA is of the Holy Judeo-Levitical lineage,the Holy SEERS who Christianized of SLAVS-SERBS
All this Holy Tech since 1876 +even after Tesla died in 1943, his papers swiped by the US Gov.& translated into HAARP-tesla, Plasma, Scalar, Satellites + space travel, MRI's called Tesla units, wireless+cell phyones, endless...
roqsanda 9 months ago
@wunderwehr i went on that website and there is only one problem with the vandenburg theory. Vandenburg claims the time machine stays in one position. But to travel in time you must move, and your movement is not relative to the objects around you but light itself. nothing else matters except the speed you are moving at. the only reason you even have to move at all is because space and time are tightly bounded together. so you cant move through time without moving through space.
SuperBigdick45 9 months ago
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff.
F0xyTh3F0x 10 months ago
@007bond66 Exactly, I agree.
I'm no physicist, but it seems to be this is very very similar to what Einstein "saw". In fact my teacher gave this "twin space travel" example in high school (10 years ago). How is this new?
dlite922 10 months ago
(continuation #3) also another point to bare in mind is that any travel on any axis in any direction is subject to the laws of thermodynamics namely entropy resulting in absolute values for the displacement in that axis including time.... so... what happens is your particles (if you want to call them that) go back in time but will act as if they are progressing forward so nothing gets younger and you don't "undo: anything you simply "do" backwards on the axis
pietrohome 10 months ago
@pietrohome i mean i dont know much but do you think a human could stay alive traveling at those speeds anyway? wouldnt you have to make something that would make you not feel the G's to survive? and in doing that wouldnt you cancel the "time travel"? seems to me youre saying youd only be able to see the past since youre catching up to that light but not experience it.
kenny8331 10 months ago
@kenny8331 Try researching anti gravity flight. By rotating super fluids at high velocities a gravitational force that exceeds earths gravity can be created. If an objected is placed within this gravitational force the "g" effect of earths gravity is not felt and that could potentially move at the speed of light. The "g" effect in space is also reduced since the further away from the earths surface you are the less of a "g" effect there is.
briancaicco 8 months ago
@briancaicco not to be a smartass but, whats your point?
kenny8331 8 months ago
@kenny8331 No Point, Just trying to help you find some answers :)
briancaicco 8 months ago
@kenny8331 Good to see discussions build from YouTube comments. What's the point of new ideas in What Einstein Did Not See? For the last 100 years physics has used a definition for time that differs little from Aristotle. It is now time for space to be conceptually defined as four-dimensional. Moving through time is not unlike moving through 3-dimensional space. You no longer can walk into a room (a 3-D process), the words volume and density do not have value (a 3-D process), etc.
timespacevector 8 months ago
@timespacevector but didnt aristotle basically say space was 4-d? what are you saying thats different? what that other dude said didnt really make sense either because if you create something with a higher g that earth the fact that the g effect in space is reduced means nothing since youd now be under the influence of the new "super gravity fluid." anyway the g effect alone should slow down time by itself but youd die before it reaches a point where time change would be noticed or maintained
kenny8331 8 months ago
@kenny8331 I think I'm with you on this one....You would eventually reach a point in which your molecules would separate from themselves from the g forces....so you couldn't go fast enough to notice a change in time because our physical matter cannot withstand the force?
Deciblaster 6 months ago
allowing matter to back in time is possible but going to the past is impossible. Just like, when you walk down one of the space dimensions you do not leave copies of yourself as you walk. Matter exists in 3 dimensions of space and all of matter travels along the dimension of time and stays in the same time slice as the rest of the matter . Marching along forward in time matter posses 4 coordinates. 3 of space and one of time. if you wished to go back to the past it is not simply as (cont).
pietrohome 10 months ago
(continuation) easy as moving your particles back in time. You would also need to bring every particle back in time and those particles would have to be in the exact same arrangement as they might have been in some past we were trying to visit. I think its asking much to try to re-arrange all of matter to prior states in order to visit the past. So what happens if you manage time move all the matter that constitutes you to a point (t-a(t)) (time now minus - abs time displacement)
pietrohome 10 months ago
(continuation#2) You would find yourself in a place but the rest of matter that you know would still be marching along at t(0). Now you may speculate endlessly about universal echoes in space time perhaps bringing you to an after image of matter at a particular point in time or it could very well be void. but the matter that constitutes some arrangement of the past would be gone.
pietrohome 10 months ago
@pietrohome you dont know what youre talking about
kenny8331 10 months ago
@kenny8331 actually i do :)
pietrohome 10 months ago
Comment removed
pietrohome 10 months ago
Comment removed
pietrohome 10 months ago
Now, if only I could sell this as a cream to the ladies...
veiakas 11 months ago 12
@veiakas The future is blind to those who dream and create new ideas.
timespacevector 10 months ago 10
@smiddy319 Yes, if you travel at top speed in a Ferrari from birth to 70 years old, you will be a few seconds younger than your twin who could not afford the Ferrari. Try buying a spaceship that travels near the speed of light for more dramatic results.
timespacevector 11 months ago
@timespacevector do you have evidence of time travel like i do? Your just another who wants easy money and make up lies as you go along. you might be educated with words but the traveller needs to be strong in the heart and body. As for readers in Einstein's theory of relativity up loaded by alvrgona, einstein don't know anything about time and space,i;ve corrected how to time travel through time and space in that page and i brought so much evidence of my IMAGE through time and space.
waynnart 10 months ago
AAAAAHHH!!!
xero907 11 months ago
let me put it this way , if i invented the time machine and went back in time and killed my self before i invented the time machine that means the time machine wasnt built at all so how could i have gone back in time and killed my self , will it cause a time loop and time will really get messed up ?
1998anirudh 11 months ago
@1998anirudh Inventing a time machine assumes technology can change the nature of time and space. This new book redefines the nature, or science, of time and space. Assumptions in science play a major role in the development of new science concepts such as scalar Universal Time and vector Timespace.
timespacevector 11 months ago
Universal time? Are you talking about a preferred frame of reference?
DKshad0w 1 year ago
@DKshad0w "Fame of reference" implies that you are in 3D space. When you think and describe invisible 4D space, you use scalar "Universal Time" that exists for all clocks in a 4D physical space. In physical space particles move through each space dimension. Remember, motion through time is not visible compared to visible motion through x-y-z, 3D-space. And, remember motion through 4D space is not visible.
timespacevector 11 months ago
If time travel was possible surely we would have come back from the future and told ourselves about it.
End of.
CertainEvil 1 year ago
@CertainEvil Read Chapter 8 of What Einstein Did Not See to learn where you might be if you experience time reversal. You will be surprised.
timespacevector 11 months ago
Care to comment on the Michelson-morley experiment in regards to Scalar Universal Time?
Since this is in Direct conflict with a tested, measurable experiment.
Prove your theory against the findings of Michelson-morley and i'll buy the book.
twide1337 1 year ago
@twide1337 The Michelson-Morley experiment only addressed the existence of ether. Since the light beam in this experiment traveled at the same speed in all directions, they (MM) concluded that ether was non-existent and that light speed is constant. This experiment never considered time as a concept to study. Einstein said that 100K experiments cannot prove Einstein's theory right, it only takes one experiment to prove it wrong. This new book presents a new paradigm where time is redefined.
timespacevector 11 months ago
so a way 2 saty younger is 2 travel realy fast alot of times in wich 2 say take alot of airplanes rideS?
13elsauz 1 year ago
@jazmanjef Once you study the complexities of Einstein's theory you will see how this new method simplifies time and space with geometry you learn in high school. Einstein did not create the idea of time as the fourth dimension. This book also defines time as a fourth road to the three roads of 3D space. Just imagine when television screens someday present FOUR DIMENSIONAL movies ! And, you can see time travel !
timespacevector 1 year ago
Note very important: I did not understand anything of the video
hanisafi4 1 year ago
@hanisafi4 After you struggle to learn Einstein's approach to time, space, and time travel, you will hopefully find this approach simple. Redefining time is the trick making this approach so easy to understand.
timespacevector 1 year ago
There was literally no math in this video, just a bunch of pictures and visuals that "proves" Einstein was wrong. So lame.
MathDoobler 1 year ago
@MathDoobler You missed the point. Read the book. The math in this book is no harder than algebra. Four-dimensional space can be described with simple algebra! There is no need for tensor math.
timespacevector 1 year ago
@timespacevector Have you ever worked in AREA51? have you ever time travel? I haven't seen the vid of the ad cause my speed to the internet is slow so i'm going to skip what this vid has to offer in time and space,my speed will go back up in 2 weeks by then i would able to watch the whole thing about your claims in time and space,if i see what wrong i'll explian its its wrong or right,because NO1 KNOWS time and space like i do.
waynnart 1 year ago
@waynnart The complex four-dimensional nature, or science, of time and space limits time travel. This new approach to time and space uses simple algebra, Euclidean geometry, and new definitions of vector Timespace and scalar Universal Time. Time can be considered both vector and scalar.
timespacevector 11 months ago
I wanna travel back in time , and slay Austrolapithecus, then humans will cease to exist.
BeamSurfer 1 year ago
@BeamSurfer This is the common argument of philosophers. Visit your young grandfather and tell him he is not marrying a nice girl. Check out the book. You will discover where time can reverse direction.
timespacevector 1 year ago
@timespacevector look time travel is very dangerous , I'm the literal guy who takes things clear cut, to me travelling even in 1000 BC and just by simply "Existing", "breathing" or "Standing" in an seemingly isolated area from that time would change the present completely for the very insignificant thing i do, and if you wanna visit a city in the past that's gonna change the future so much that even if you talk to no one , you can change everything by simply occupieng space .
BeamSurfer 1 year ago
@BeamSurfer Well you're wrong one can only time travel into the future and even then they're not really time travelling but to an observer they are. Also if you could alter the past, which you can't, everything would be the same because time would loop therefore you would need to time travel back to kill Austrolapithecus but if you went back in time and destroyed Austro... then you wouldn't be around in the future to travel back thus you never travelled back so austro... would still be alive.
Tps2step 11 months ago
Hi, are you using a speech synthesis program? and if so, which one? thanks :)
SimSiggaard 1 year ago
@SimSiggaard This YouTube was created by the book's cover designer. Credit to this designer is inside the book.
timespacevector 1 year ago
i am 11 years old this is correct yes but we don't know the exact cause sure it takes longer to get to that point and stuff i get it but can't explain it we can not time travel whith out knowing the cause of time it is like trying to add whith out numbers we can not be sure of the outcomes and thereires
gamehackercheatman 1 year ago
the speed of light or darkness is nothing compared to the ultimate speed of thought ,if a supernatural body just projects a thought to be on the other side of the known universe then you are there in an instant ! Think and you are there !
mrscurmi 1 year ago
@mrscurmi
prove it
gaaar4 1 year ago
Interesting theory, which only works if Time is considered as a fourth spatial dimension. Minkowski performed this mathematical trick by multiplying Time in seconds by the speed of light. Seconds cancel out, giving each second a "length" of 2.99792458 x 10^8 meters or 186,282.397 miles. The real Universe consists of three spatial dimensions, the familiar x, y, and z axes. Time exists so that things can happen in our 3-dimensional Universe.
SuperMagnetizer 1 year ago
@SuperMagnetizer Vector timespace (in meters), as well as scalar universal time (in seconds), together redefines time in "What Einstein Did Not See." The term, timespace, is not a simple juxtaposition of Minkowski's space-time continuum. Timespace was chosen to honor Minkowski's 1909 work. Timespace defines the 4th dimension in 4D physical space where particles move through each space dimension. Universal time (in seconds) measures motion in each dimension. 4D physical space is not 3D space
timespacevector 1 year ago
so according to this the best way of "time travel" would be to fall into a black hole. but isnt there a problem...how do you get out of the black hole if the gravitational pull of it is so strong it doesnt let light escape. you would have to go faster than light to get out. i dont see how thats possible.
xxgleexx 1 year ago
@xxgleexx Note, you are using x-y-z, space. X-y-z space is one of four space projections from 4D physical space: x-y-z, x-y-t, x-z-t, and y-z-t. If you want to discuss forces on you as you fall into a black hole, then you are limiting yourself to the x-y-z, 3D space projection. Note: terms like volume, inside, and center are also limited to the x-y-z space projection.
timespacevector 1 year ago
Don't bet the farm on this, it's wrong.
Why?
Simply because "Light-Speed" isn't a measure of Time. It's a measure of distance! It's how far light can travel in a given length of time; D=(VT) Where D is the total distance traveled, V=Velocity and T=Time spent traveling at velocity V.
See? Einstein used light speed because it's a constant and doesn't change (much). So with 1 constant in the equation, all other unknown values can be more easily figured. Light-speed is always confused for velocity
DrGoodwrench64 1 year ago
@DrGoodwrench64 Time can be redefined into a Timespace dimension (meters) as well as a scalar measure of Universal Time (seconds). One-light-year is distance (meters) traveled in 3D space. If Timespace is the fourth dimension, then one-light-year could also be the distance (meters) of aging. Einstein did not see time as a dimension. Nor did he have a symbol for differing speeds thru time. Chapt 6 shows that contraction of Timespace is time dilation. Now speed thru Timespace has a symbol.
timespacevector 1 year ago
@timespacevector
I can kinda see what you're getting at. But, I think Einstein DID see Time as a being a dimension. He thought there could exist up to 8 dimensions, Time being one of them. He got hung up on his own theory of Relativity. What he couldn't (or wouldn't) see is that his theory of Relativity was flawed by the thought of light being the fastest thing in the Universe. He never even considered the speed of Darkness (which is faster than Light).
DrGoodwrench64 1 year ago
@DrGoodwrench64 Einstein did not consider space's fourth dimension until his math professor's (Minkowski's) paper Raum & Zeit (Space & Time) was published in 1909. For a few years Einstein referred to Minkowski's work, but after several years passed, higher space dimensions are usually and improperly accredited to Einstein. Today physicists in superstring theory will use eleven-dimensional space.
timespacevector 1 year ago
@DrGoodwrench64 SPEED OF DARKNESS??? Consider electricity. Ionized air moves with the lightning bolt (direction of electric current). High speed photography in the mid 20th Century showed electrons moving in the opposite direction. Positive protons bound in the nuclei of the ionized air do not move. Speed of a particle of mass defines speed measurement. The particle of light is the photon. When the particle of dark energy is discovered, then its speed might be the speed of darkness. :)
timespacevector 1 year ago
@timespacevector
Dark Energy??? I never said anything about Dark Matter or Dark Energy. I meant Dark. As in, the absence of light. The speed at which light is overcome by Darkness is whats called the Speed of Dark. And it's faster than the Speed of Light. Tesla's wireless energy transmission system used ground-waves that traveled at 320,000+ Mi\s. Almost double Light speed.
See, in order for this theory to work, you have to accept that Light Speed ISN'T the fastest thing in the Universe.
DrGoodwrench64 1 year ago
well, what the heck are ya waitin on...? build this time mo-chine and take us back to the 60"s......
badfall07 1 year ago
@badfall07 As for time reversal, the easiest way to reach the speed of light is falling into a black hole. When you reach the speed of light, however, your watch is observed to stop. Does this mean you stop falling? Does this mean time will reverse direction? This means you have reached the edge of space called the event horizon. Beyond this no events can be observed according to Einstein. In What Einstein Did Not See, time reverses direction. 4D space is a superior way to describe space.
timespacevector 1 year ago
@timespacevector
Problem is, that long before you get to the "Stop" point, you've already been crushed to the size of an atom and you're dead. Time travel can't help you now.
So, falling into a Black hole may be the fastest way to get to the speed of light, but it's the dumbest way as well.
But, lets say you could, as in this video, both parties experience the passage of time as they normally would, in a Linear fashion. So, you wouldn't observe time slowing at all. To you, time moves as usual.
DrGoodwrench64 1 year ago
Thank you robert.:)
Gonegoodforever 1 year ago
whowhat?
ipwnedurchat 1 year ago
@ipwnedurchat Einstein knew that the speed of light is the top speed in space. For example, if you light a match and then travel quickly to somewhere in 3D space, you could see yourself light the match as if going backwards in time. Einstein introduced that the better limit to space is not infinity, but the speed of light itself. Minkowski showed 4D space best explains this new limit. This new book is easier because it uses Euclidean geometry rather than 4D spherical geometry.
timespacevector 1 year ago
@timespacevector Exactly!
pi314phi162 1 year ago
I wanna be a time traveler.
robertlewisvazquez 1 year ago
@robertlewisvazquez Choose from two types of time travel: 1) Aging at different rates. 2) Time reversal. TYPE 1: Acquire a nuclear rocket engine that accelerates you to 0.8 c in one year. Take a trip out and back to Earth for a total of 40 years on your watch. Use one-year accelerations and decelerations (to turn around and stop). When you return to Earth your spouse ages 70 years! Conflict in watches is different 4D TIMESPACE DISPLACEMENTS in meters. TYPE 2: Enter a black hole & die.
timespacevector 1 year ago
@timespacevector Whats the difference my girlfriend acts 70 yrs old all ready lol. I still would do it. Im not afraid are you?
robertlewisvazquez 1 year ago
@robertlewisvazquez Everyone now experiences time travel at different rates. Astronauts returning to Earth from the space station are minutes younger than when they started. It is rumored, however, that NASA has a nuclear-powered engine than can accelerate to 0.8 c in one year! More important: Will you have enough food to eat on a 40-year long trip? :)
timespacevector 1 year ago
@timespacevector Hopefully I'm allowed a few pit stops on the way. =) But I'm really not worried as long as I go.
robertlewisvazquez 1 year ago
@timespacevector or dont die
Mat397 1 year ago
@robertlewisvazquez Have you seen The Charlie Chaplin Time Traveler?
Gonegoodforever 1 year ago
@Gonegoodforever Never seen it before, thank you that was cool.
robertlewisvazquez 1 year ago
Comment removed
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
Comment removed
LeconsdAnalyse 1 year ago
But the reverse must also be true - so when returning towards the second stationary clock time MUST therefore speed up - its only the photons of light observd which are appearing to either slow or speed up as the travelling observer moves away at say light speed each photon takes longer to get there - this calcualtion does not make sense - even Einstien admitted it was flawed - but it was only a theory
kisslite 1 year ago
@kisslite In this argument, one tries to logically perceive what one will view from a moving object. This type of thought uses space limited to three dimensions. This 3D space is experienced by Earth creatures who move very slow. Universal Reference Frames, introduced in What Einstein Did Not See, are any reference frame where one's own motion cannot be observed or considered. Four-dimensional physical space has no visual qualities. Just as time has no visual qualities.
timespacevector 1 year ago
This is just another ad to sell a book. If not, then the graphs have to be more definitive. It goes so fast that this ad itself goes faster than the speed of light.
ALaudun 1 year ago
there is a problem with this. If velocity through space affects velocity through time, but an event is defined by 3 spacial and 1 time dimensions, then if I said, meet me at such and such location at 3:00, wouldn't we miss each other since the stationary person would reach 3:00 later? Unless we are all on our own independent timelines, we would not be able to observe time offsets on atomic clocks travelling at different speeds, according to this hypothesis.
EverythingZen14 1 year ago
@EverythingZen14 In this new approach scalar Universal Time is measured in seconds for all in Universal Reference Frames. Four dimensional PHYSICAL space does not use 3D concepts. Timeline is a concept from Minkowski & Einstein relativity where time is limited to a scalar and physical space is 3D. Universal Time of 3:00 would be in agreement with all who specify scalar Universal Time in seconds. The amount of vector Timespace (meters) necessary to meet could be different for each traveler.
timespacevector 1 year ago
If you have a spaceship traveling at just under the speed of light, say 25 mph less, and a housefly flies from the rear of the ship to the front at 30 mph, is the fly traveling at superlumious speed? Particles traveling FTL in a given medium will cause a blue glow indicative of Perendev Radiation. The key here is that light travels at different speeds in different mediums. The Interstellar Matrix is a medium not a perfect vacuum. What is the speed of light thru the IM?
SeriousNot 1 year ago
@SeriousNot See p 5 of What Einstein Did Not See. One's speed will never exceed the speed of light because one moves in a moving reference frame. Einstein's 1905 Special Relativity paper also presented the same result that appears on p 5. / Another unrelated idea is the variation of the speed of light in differing mediums. You also ask if there exists an absolute value for the speed of light. All speeds measure from Universal Reference Frames. 4D-PHYSICAL SPACE is unlike any 3D space.
timespacevector 1 year ago
Albert was not stationary as the Earth is constantly moving through space.
SeriousNot 1 year ago
@SeriousNot A passenger in the Concord Jet casually sips tea as the jet moves faster than the speed of sound. If the jet windows are opaque, ask the passenger, "Are you at rest?" The response: "I am sitting at rest, drinking tea." IF A PERSON CANNOT SEE ONE'S OWN MOTION, THEN THE PERSON IS AT REST. Earth rotates, Earth revolves about the Sun, and Earth moves with the solar system in a rotating galaxy that can collide with another. You, the reader, are at rest in a Universal Reference Frame.
timespacevector 1 year ago
i understand why this works but i dont get why the longer trip means a shorter time
squirrelspown 1 year ago
this theory is so cool i believe every word of it simple mathmatical equations prove this thi