im against the US's "world police" tactics and all but Osama had it coming sooner or later. it's certainly better for the world that he's off the radar
@UltraProle21, you blathering fool. You are but a puer, an overemotional pollywog, a cretin. Was you mother unable to afford the abortion? You must know, it is not to late to commit suicide. We'll just call it "LATE term abortion."
Your words bore me, for I am the pretentious KING of pseudo-intellectual snobs on these threads, Buckley and Chomsky, and my gay companions.
I haven't had sex in decades (except with my dildo). My hemorrhoids are making even THAT source of pleasure rare
The largest problem with US as I see it is that rhetoric and reality couldn't be further from each other. What words are left to say about the country who pretends to the world police man but thought nothing of using thermonuclear weapons, the only one to do so, upon not a military target but a civilian city? I won't leave it out to dry mind you, you do have two very precious things; enshrined freedom of speech and a bill of rights; just a shame it doesn't extend outside the border.
It was sure as hell created by the CIA/Mossad and if you don't believe that then fine, just laugh your happy trust-fund-ass all the way through your worthless lives you college scum.
I'll be your new daddy if you watch: "Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers." I know some boys need a firm man to direct their lives. And to other students: if you can debate Operation Northwoods, The Project For a New American Century, nano-thermite & the melting point of steel, then you are qualified to ridicule "9/11 Truth." If you are uninformed, then I understand why you still listen to Chomsky. Get a Chomsky t-shirt. Or a Chomsky tattoo: "Chomsky is smart."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
SHHHHHHHH!! Why do people still respect this old fart? At best he gives an inaccurate surface reading of current events, at worst (which I doubt) he's a "left gatekeeper." Either way, he's far to arrogant and caught up in the bubble of his academic celebrity. I see this so often, people like Howard Zinn, Chomsky, George Lakoff, even Daniel Elsberg: revered as infallible wise men, but misunderstanding the empirical data of NOW. Younger people: think for yourself. These men are out of date.
thanks for asking. google Susan Lindauer. amazing story. I like John Perkins, Kevin Ryan (dig within), Ron Paul & Alex Jones. an accurate understanding of 9/11 is my litmus test... altho I'll excuse Ron Paul on that. I like some of those old guys, but if they can't understand building 7 they are just in the way. happy new year!
Heard this funny anecdote the other day - here is the nub:
Mother: "Son, we are starving so you need to sell the family cow. Get what you can and buy food so we will live."
Son goes to market & against mother's wishes, swaps cow for magic beans. Uses beans to enter another's land and home. Is cared for by others, yet steals from them. Owner of the stolen goods attempts to retrieve item and is killed. Wife of owner wants son punished and is therefore also killed.
The FBI have 'no evidence' linking OBL to 9/11 because 'NONE ever existed'. Yet still he says they (the FBI) were probably correct...
This is the problem with intellectuals. They are arrogant enough to think that even uninformed opinions of their own must be correct because they are so learned in other areas....
AL QAEDA has never existed. It means DATABASE and was invented by the CIA.. a list of jihadists they controlled to fight the USSR in afghanistan. Robin Cook the former British Foreign secretary revealed this. He was murdered a few weeks after 7/7.
And so I wonder, whether the rise in "Al Queda" reflected in the wikileaks from the Iraq war isn't really more reflective of how soldiers classify people than what those people actually are. Maybe there was a tendency or an informal policy arise clarifying any hostiles as, "Al Queda" similar to the inflated, and careless ways of counting enemy kills in Vietnam. Just a thought.
There are a lot of network of networks throughout history that share nothing but a common ideaology. There's a problem of identification. It means that anyone who shares the ideaology could potentially be called a member of the group and one couldn't refute it. Why don't we just call it an ideaology instead of an organization if it has almost no organizational roles? Clearly we don't because then it wouldn't justify our conduct in reaction to it if we did.
@SLAVESweARE, you got that right, except let's not discount one component of the story. Chomsky is Yale, which only serves to inform the lesser children of the elite, and those who aspire to join their ranks. So, it's pseudo-intellectualism at best, with 'gatekeeper' thrown in for political correctness...
I fucking hate hushing people. Just hate them. It's the single most annoying sound in the world. It doesn't matter how stupid someone is, hushing will never help. And Chomsky had the situation under control. Yet the sheep-like hushing occurred.
@ChillpointNews Well the crowd wanted to listen to chomsky actually speak instead of have a conversation with the conspiracy theorist, I woulda hushed that asshole too.
we are anonymous, we are aware of the corruption in the world's governments and their apathy for the human lives because of money.
we are aware of the governments' attempt to cover on the news of the rebellions to keep us as slaves for the current system.
we are anonymous, we declare war on the corrupted system, join the plan to get your freedom and rights back. you are a human being, your life has value. we are anonymous, we are legion, expect us!
Attacking an opponent’s motives or character rather than the policy or position they maintain, e.g. when people don't possess the skill(s) to debate the issues they disagree with, they may defer to personal attacks against the individual presenting the argument.
In Germany Terrorwarnings came from politicans. The "Quaida" said after bin ladens death that europe is under threat they will show they are still operative.
talked about a dirty bomb. one famous cancelor from the 80ths said that the most danger now comes from state orchestrated terrorism. It is speculated that there will be an 9\11 like event in germany to have some more wars started.
for more infos write me.
best guess is a dirty bomb@the first game in the Girls football World Championchip
@Tritonium2k7 You're making best guesses on when thousands of innocent people might be lethally irradiated? What, for fun? So that if you're right people will be impressed with your prescience? You are a sick fuck!
1. The opinions of Chomsky are mostly mainstream, shared by a majority of people globally and among americans. Just look at the polls on international politics. So what your'e saying is that a majority of the american public is ''the scum of the earth''?
2. Chomsky is not necessary opposed to free markets. He is just pointing out that the US economic system has never been a free market system.
@LibertyDownUnder I don't usually like to get in on youtube comments, but I just thought I might add that Noam Chomsky is often touted as one of the most famous anarchists in history. I think a government takeover is not at all what he's looking for, it's probably closer to promoting the management of economies by groups of highyl democratic and informed workers, sort of an an anarcho-syndicalist position
@jeffrheaume, to some degree that's what FDR tried to do with his brains trust. That didn't work too well.
Please look at this one: /watch?v=nvo9O4A18d0 here he clearly advocates a Government takeover of the healthcare system. There's nothing 'anarchist' or democratic about this position.
@1844Freddy Plus if you criticise Israel then you are an antisemite (read as racist). It is well known that calling someone a racist will win any argument in lieu of facts. If that does not work then list as many irrelevant facts as possible, sprinkled with lies in the hope of getting them through unnoticed so you can then bring them up later as proof of aforementioned racism. It gets tiresome.
@1844Freddy There is no country that has never done everything 100 percent right but usually what is in it's best interest for survival as a free republic, which is not always what is US policy. America survives because you have the fundamental basic liberties as humans to be and become whatever you want. It's the pure evil and cruelty of certain people that have ruined our economy and ignorance of people that sets us back.
America hasn't done anything right since WW2, though. Liberty isn't a commodity that should be made available for consumption. So bragging about having it is bragging about those who you believe can take it away. Stop that. Liberty is a human civil right and there should be a society that values it as such. So far the people of America do, but that seems to have been changing for some time now.
@1844Freddy When other countries do it it's called terrorism. When the U.S. does it, we're "fighting for democracy," when that is essentially the thing our country tries to keep from happening.
In the days of Adam Smith and other classical economists "Free Market" meant a market free from monopoly pricing, economic rent, fraud, etc. Today "free market" means a market free for fraud.
@WilhelmDrake, I think it is a mistake to blame the current financial mess on the free market.
If you have some time, this movie called "Overdose" is probably the best explanation I've seen on the net on what's happening and what's about to happen: /watch?v=4ECi6WJpbzE
I didn't blame the "free market" for anything. I simply noted that there has been a change in the definition of the term. So while modern economists love Smith, Ricardo, etc, they fail to note that their usage of classical terminology has altered the meaning, generally by giving it the opposite of the intended original.
In regard to the crisis, I found William K. Black to be most illuminating.
See: Control Fraud, specifically Accounting Control Fraud.
@WilhelmDrake, I agree that the term free market has been skewed quite a bit.
But I disagree with Black's analysis. I read his article in the Huff post which largely ignores the Fed, and places the blame on individual banks & rating agencies.
The root cause of the problem is much deeper than that, and is explained in detail in the movie I sent you. If you watch the 1st 5-10 minutes you should get a good idea of what it's about
People keep messing up finding the real culprits cause they keep getting sucked in by the popular lies. The audience member spoke a half truth, but because he only got it half-right, he failed to understand what is really going on.
THis notion of Mossad being in control is a lie to hide and cover up who is really in control. It is a lie though that on the surface looks correct.
But the real answer of who created Al-Quaeda is "the CIA and the Vatican".
im against the US's "world police" tactics and all but Osama had it coming sooner or later. it's certainly better for the world that he's off the radar
partisan49 2 weeks ago
@partisan49 - Agree with you.
caviper1 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@UltraProle21, you blathering fool. You are but a puer, an overemotional pollywog, a cretin. Was you mother unable to afford the abortion? You must know, it is not to late to commit suicide. We'll just call it "LATE term abortion."
Your words bore me, for I am the pretentious KING of pseudo-intellectual snobs on these threads, Buckley and Chomsky, and my gay companions.
I haven't had sex in decades (except with my dildo). My hemorrhoids are making even THAT source of pleasure rare
TempIarLeonem 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chomsky as proof=FAIL
you can cite a source as reference, but you had beyer multisource for your CONCLUSION.
You use a single source and call it proof, you fail- even at High School level.
Ignorant liberals.
*sheesh*
TemplarLeonem 3 weeks ago
Dollar collapse
HillTribeman 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
VirtuosicElevator 1 month ago
The largest problem with US as I see it is that rhetoric and reality couldn't be further from each other. What words are left to say about the country who pretends to the world police man but thought nothing of using thermonuclear weapons, the only one to do so, upon not a military target but a civilian city? I won't leave it out to dry mind you, you do have two very precious things; enshrined freedom of speech and a bill of rights; just a shame it doesn't extend outside the border.
TheMotherEagle 1 month ago
It was sure as hell created by the CIA/Mossad and if you don't believe that then fine, just laugh your happy trust-fund-ass all the way through your worthless lives you college scum.
ohmgrown1991 1 month ago
@chinapisces
I'll be your new daddy if you watch: "Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers." I know some boys need a firm man to direct their lives. And to other students: if you can debate Operation Northwoods, The Project For a New American Century, nano-thermite & the melting point of steel, then you are qualified to ridicule "9/11 Truth." If you are uninformed, then I understand why you still listen to Chomsky. Get a Chomsky t-shirt. Or a Chomsky tattoo: "Chomsky is smart."
youngbums1 1 month ago
my intellectual daddy is Chomsky. "Because my Chomsky said so, that's why!"
youngbums1 1 month ago
Enjoy your illusions, students.
youngbums1 1 month ago
chompsky is a fuckin brain washer
fodads 1 month ago
@fodads: You're an idiot.
chinopisces 1 month ago
@fodads
Chomsky is the most cited shcolar in the world. Its a fact look it up.
That means i can write a University THESIS, and use his work as PROOF.
Thats means in the Education world, the world of FACTS, and REALITY, Chomsky is BOSS.
irex19 1 month ago 3
@irex19 lol the education worl is the world of facts and reality? give me a break. aside from the hard sciences, this is far from the case.
UltraProle21 1 month ago
imagine the middle east sans oil... dry, just dry. a camel does not need oil...
wondergundy 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SHHHHHHHH!! Why do people still respect this old fart? At best he gives an inaccurate surface reading of current events, at worst (which I doubt) he's a "left gatekeeper." Either way, he's far to arrogant and caught up in the bubble of his academic celebrity. I see this so often, people like Howard Zinn, Chomsky, George Lakoff, even Daniel Elsberg: revered as infallible wise men, but misunderstanding the empirical data of NOW. Younger people: think for yourself. These men are out of date.
youngbums1 2 months ago
@youngbums1 whose analysis of current events do you recommend?
mudboymudboy 2 months ago
@mudboymudboy
thanks for asking. google Susan Lindauer. amazing story. I like John Perkins, Kevin Ryan (dig within), Ron Paul & Alex Jones. an accurate understanding of 9/11 is my litmus test... altho I'll excuse Ron Paul on that. I like some of those old guys, but if they can't understand building 7 they are just in the way. happy new year!
youngbums1 2 months ago
@mudboymudboy also Chris Hedges "Brace Yourself..."
youngbums1 2 months ago
@youngbums1 And how exactly is he "misinformed?"
I mean, he's "older" than most involved in politics, but so is Ron Paul, whom you claim to like.
superclaydude 1 month ago
@youngbums: You're an idiot.
chinopisces 1 month ago
america is bullshit just bullshit
321atm 2 months ago
Heard this funny anecdote the other day - here is the nub:
Mother: "Son, we are starving so you need to sell the family cow. Get what you can and buy food so we will live."
Son goes to market & against mother's wishes, swaps cow for magic beans. Uses beans to enter another's land and home. Is cared for by others, yet steals from them. Owner of the stolen goods attempts to retrieve item and is killed. Wife of owner wants son punished and is therefore also killed.
and the son is the hero
seriphone 3 months ago
How can an intellectual be so blind.
The FBI have 'no evidence' linking OBL to 9/11 because 'NONE ever existed'. Yet still he says they (the FBI) were probably correct...
This is the problem with intellectuals. They are arrogant enough to think that even uninformed opinions of their own must be correct because they are so learned in other areas....
noozilander 3 months ago
Chomsky - Zionist Israeli lobby whore blindly followed by those that consider themselves 'intellectual', but who are merely fools.
NZDuriahheap 5 months ago
LMAO "NOT run by the CIA and Mossad". Of course not. People who say that are totally ignoring the glaring errors in their logic.
PurpleHoneyBear 5 months ago
I love to sleep.
MichaelStepkoff 5 months ago
AL QAEDA has never existed. It means DATABASE and was invented by the CIA.. a list of jihadists they controlled to fight the USSR in afghanistan. Robin Cook the former British Foreign secretary revealed this. He was murdered a few weeks after 7/7.
bennythebearful 6 months ago
And so I wonder, whether the rise in "Al Queda" reflected in the wikileaks from the Iraq war isn't really more reflective of how soldiers classify people than what those people actually are. Maybe there was a tendency or an informal policy arise clarifying any hostiles as, "Al Queda" similar to the inflated, and careless ways of counting enemy kills in Vietnam. Just a thought.
cogitheum 6 months ago
There are a lot of network of networks throughout history that share nothing but a common ideaology. There's a problem of identification. It means that anyone who shares the ideaology could potentially be called a member of the group and one couldn't refute it. Why don't we just call it an ideaology instead of an organization if it has almost no organizational roles? Clearly we don't because then it wouldn't justify our conduct in reaction to it if we did.
cogitheum 6 months ago
Hes right osama aka tim osman was trained by cia and given alquida wepons
johngorgis 6 months ago
@SLAVESweARE, you got that right, except let's not discount one component of the story. Chomsky is Yale, which only serves to inform the lesser children of the elite, and those who aspire to join their ranks. So, it's pseudo-intellectualism at best, with 'gatekeeper' thrown in for political correctness...
ChezKiva 7 months ago
Throughout his career, Chomsky's whole sine qua non has been to reveal and expose how the U.S government blatantly lies about basically everything...
Yet, since 9/11, he basically accepts EVERY version which comes straight out of the plutocracy that is the United States Government...
He accepts Cheney's and Bush' sand Rumsfeld's version of 9/11...
Hen accepts the whole "Bin Laden killed by U.S raid and body dumped in ocean" version.
Chomsky has become nothing more than a gate-keeper, period!
SLAVESweARE 7 months ago
I fucking hate hushing people. Just hate them. It's the single most annoying sound in the world. It doesn't matter how stupid someone is, hushing will never help. And Chomsky had the situation under control. Yet the sheep-like hushing occurred.
ChillpointNews 7 months ago
@ChillpointNews I agree with you, but I think it's indicative of how bored people are with 'conspiracy theorists' like that guy who started shouting.
ruffa65 7 months ago
@ChillpointNews Well the crowd wanted to listen to chomsky actually speak instead of have a conversation with the conspiracy theorist, I woulda hushed that asshole too.
Keinlicht 5 months ago
@ChillpointNews i completely agree. shhing people drives me nuts.
Jiancor21 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we are anonymous, we are aware of the corruption in the world's governments and their apathy for the human lives because of money.
we are aware of the governments' attempt to cover on the news of the rebellions to keep us as slaves for the current system.
we are anonymous, we declare war on the corrupted system, join the plan to get your freedom and rights back. you are a human being, your life has value. we are anonymous, we are legion, expect us!
whatis-theplan(dot)org
Thumb Up/ Repost!
Odiggidy 7 months ago
i meant to say 2002
mangeloz 7 months ago
bin laden has been dead since 202, this whole special ops OBL assasination is a hoax
mangeloz 7 months ago
I wish i could visit one of his lectures! One of the most impressive persons I ever saw.
HousekaterClaudio 7 months ago
bin ladens boys were supportive of jihadist as was israellike there funding of hamas but i think the fell out lol
timetochilli 7 months ago
Ad hominem |ˈad ˈhämənəm|
Attacking an opponent’s motives or character rather than the policy or position they maintain, e.g. when people don't possess the skill(s) to debate the issues they disagree with, they may defer to personal attacks against the individual presenting the argument.
Juxtapresupposed 8 months ago 32
@Juxtapresupposed Only fags use Latin.
Frisbieinstein 2 months ago
In Germany Terrorwarnings came from politicans. The "Quaida" said after bin ladens death that europe is under threat they will show they are still operative.
talked about a dirty bomb. one famous cancelor from the 80ths said that the most danger now comes from state orchestrated terrorism. It is speculated that there will be an 9\11 like event in germany to have some more wars started.
for more infos write me.
best guess is a dirty bomb@the first game in the Girls football World Championchip
Tritonium2k7 8 months ago
@Tritonium2k7 You're making best guesses on when thousands of innocent people might be lethally irradiated? What, for fun? So that if you're right people will be impressed with your prescience? You are a sick fuck!
jacksawild 8 months ago
@jacksawild
The sick fuck tries to understand the power structures of this world. and you're right these are sick.
innocent people died in large numbers and that's why someone has to collect information on this.
9\11 could have been prevented if americans would care for their country obviously they don't and are ignorant about the truth until today.
it's not about impressing someone it is to let people not be blinded by the media...
Tritonium2k7 8 months ago
LET ME TELL YOU RIGHT NOW...NOAM IS FULL OF SHIT. OBAMA DIDNT KILL BIN LADEN. WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yourmajezty 9 months ago
@LibertyDownUnder Your attitude sounds 1933ish, Third Reichish, in fact.
Robert85435 9 months ago
That's better.
knowthetruth1492 9 months ago
@PhilosophicMiscreant You still haven't. How was his answer in any way an evasion?
polymath7 9 months ago
Noam chomsky, the scum of the earth, standing in unity with anyone who hates America, or even free markets.
LibertyDownUnder 10 months ago
@LibertyDownUnder
1. The opinions of Chomsky are mostly mainstream, shared by a majority of people globally and among americans. Just look at the polls on international politics. So what your'e saying is that a majority of the american public is ''the scum of the earth''?
2. Chomsky is not necessary opposed to free markets. He is just pointing out that the US economic system has never been a free market system.
Endstation 10 months ago 2
@LibertyDownUnder
3. Chomsky is not ''standing in unity'' with anyone who hates america. But if you define America as Wall Street, then your'e right.
Endstation 10 months ago
@Endstation,
1. Not true and I have no idea what you're basing this on.
2. He is opposed to free markets, youtube is loaded with his lectures where he opposes them.
3. He goes all over the world and blames the US for everything under the sun.
LibertyDownUnder 10 months ago
@LibertyDownUnder "America is always right! Anyone who criticizes America is scum! America has never done anything wrong!"
You are exactly the reason why America is becoming a totalitarian state. Stop being like this please.
1844Freddy 10 months ago 54
@1844Freddy, I don't like extremists from either side.
LibertyDownUnder 10 months ago
@LibertyDownUnder Calling someone the scum of the Earth because they question the status quo isn't extreme?
1844Freddy 9 months ago 7
@1844Freddy, that's not why I called him the scum of the earth.
I've listened to many of his lectures before, and they all blame the US & free markets for the world's problems.
He wishes for a Government takeover of the economy in the name of 'equality' and dismisses anyone who disagrees as 'anti-poor, or racist'.
THIS is why I call him the scum of the earth.
LibertyDownUnder 9 months ago
@LibertyDownUnder obvious troll is obvious
garen420 9 months ago
@LibertyDownUnder I don't usually like to get in on youtube comments, but I just thought I might add that Noam Chomsky is often touted as one of the most famous anarchists in history. I think a government takeover is not at all what he's looking for, it's probably closer to promoting the management of economies by groups of highyl democratic and informed workers, sort of an an anarcho-syndicalist position
jeffrheaume 9 months ago
@jeffrheaume, to some degree that's what FDR tried to do with his brains trust. That didn't work too well.
Please look at this one: /watch?v=nvo9O4A18d0 here he clearly advocates a Government takeover of the healthcare system. There's nothing 'anarchist' or democratic about this position.
LibertyDownUnder 9 months ago
@1844Freddy Plus if you criticise Israel then you are an antisemite (read as racist). It is well known that calling someone a racist will win any argument in lieu of facts. If that does not work then list as many irrelevant facts as possible, sprinkled with lies in the hope of getting them through unnoticed so you can then bring them up later as proof of aforementioned racism. It gets tiresome.
jacksawild 6 months ago
@1844Freddy You are the reason there are trolls: You feed them.
PolitcalIslam 2 months ago
@1844Freddy There is no country that has never done everything 100 percent right but usually what is in it's best interest for survival as a free republic, which is not always what is US policy. America survives because you have the fundamental basic liberties as humans to be and become whatever you want. It's the pure evil and cruelty of certain people that have ruined our economy and ignorance of people that sets us back.
RunningFromGrizzlies 1 month ago
@RunningFromGrizzlies
America hasn't done anything right since WW2, though. Liberty isn't a commodity that should be made available for consumption. So bragging about having it is bragging about those who you believe can take it away. Stop that. Liberty is a human civil right and there should be a society that values it as such. So far the people of America do, but that seems to have been changing for some time now.
mesmerizedbyamy1 1 month ago
@1844Freddy When other countries do it it's called terrorism. When the U.S. does it, we're "fighting for democracy," when that is essentially the thing our country tries to keep from happening.
sk8tafrnk 1 month ago
@1844Freddy "becoming"? I can't think of a time in history that it wouldn't be fair to call the US totalitarian.
DeflocculatedDentist 4 weeks ago 2
@1844Freddy wtf...you do realize this is youtube right?? that fools trollin hard
MarioBrosClassic 3 weeks ago
@LibertyDownUnder
In the days of Adam Smith and other classical economists "Free Market" meant a market free from monopoly pricing, economic rent, fraud, etc. Today "free market" means a market free for fraud.
WilhelmDrake 9 months ago
@WilhelmDrake, I think it is a mistake to blame the current financial mess on the free market.
If you have some time, this movie called "Overdose" is probably the best explanation I've seen on the net on what's happening and what's about to happen: /watch?v=4ECi6WJpbzE
LibertyDownUnder 9 months ago
@LibertyDownUnder
I didn't blame the "free market" for anything. I simply noted that there has been a change in the definition of the term. So while modern economists love Smith, Ricardo, etc, they fail to note that their usage of classical terminology has altered the meaning, generally by giving it the opposite of the intended original.
In regard to the crisis, I found William K. Black to be most illuminating.
See: Control Fraud, specifically Accounting Control Fraud.
WilhelmDrake 9 months ago
@WilhelmDrake, I agree that the term free market has been skewed quite a bit.
But I disagree with Black's analysis. I read his article in the Huff post which largely ignores the Fed, and places the blame on individual banks & rating agencies.
The root cause of the problem is much deeper than that, and is explained in detail in the movie I sent you. If you watch the 1st 5-10 minutes you should get a good idea of what it's about
LibertyDownUnder 9 months ago
People keep messing up finding the real culprits cause they keep getting sucked in by the popular lies. The audience member spoke a half truth, but because he only got it half-right, he failed to understand what is really going on.
THis notion of Mossad being in control is a lie to hide and cover up who is really in control. It is a lie though that on the surface looks correct.
But the real answer of who created Al-Quaeda is "the CIA and the Vatican".
LiquidSmooth 10 months ago