That Fox News hack all of a sudden talks about the "Constitution" when Bush has been trampling over it for 8 years by wiretapping ordinary American phones. Now all of a sudden they give a shit. My question to Mike Papantonio is you NEED TO STOP them from interrupting you. It's rude and it's what they do to liberals all the time to stop you from answering.
are you 8 years old? because wiretapping has always been happening, as long as we've had phones buddy. it keeps dipshits like you safe everyday. Why has it come up now? because jerkoffs with sour grapes for the past 8 years at the new york times wanted to get bush on something, its fucking bullshit
No shit mongoose63124, but do you know what WARRANTLESS wiretapping is? It's one of those things that protects you it's called the CONSTITUTION. You must really hate America.
no i love america, im just a realist, if you hate wiretapping, then blame everyone, not just W....just trying to help you people to not immeadiately discount your arguemnts for seeing you as an in the tank liberal
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Ben Franklin
GWB was the only one who advocated WARRANTLESS wiretapping and even on ordinary Americans. We will find out soon enough about who he did it to, probably on his political enemies. Don't worry you being a right wing mouthbreather is enough to discount your argument. Try reading the U.S. Constitution sometime you might like it.
"GWB was the only one who advocated WARRANTLESS wiretapping and even on ordinary Americans. "
rakrobn, you know nothing....and you;'re a fucking moron........i understand being a liberal, you have no concept of solving real world problems, but trust me on this one
Yeah, keep thinking that bitch. Is that why the Bush administration is not releasing any of its emails like OTHER presidents do, when it has no classified information? Right. Hope you like your Democratic House and Senate. Keep it up and it will be that way for decades.
You dumb mongoose, Clinton had wiretaps, the only difference is he OBEYED THE LAW, and obtained warrants just like EVERYONE ELSE does. Email has been for a while now, not just GWB. Are you still so dense that the distinction I'm making is getting a WARRANT vs. NOT getting a warrant? I didn't say NOT to do wiretaps. Did you eat paintchips as a child?
funny how you libs believe every negative accusation about W, yet wont about anyone else, do you not want to be taken seriously? or do you just not care?
So if the Fairness Doctrine is instituted, does that mean that if you have a show about the Holocaust, you have to have a person who denies the Holocaust along with a person who believes it happened? This scenario proves how ridiculous and untenable the Doctrine is! Let the free market work! If someone wants to start a station for Druids, they should be able to do that. But if people don't want to listen to Druids on the radio, the station should fail just like Air America! Government keep out!!
hey ikf661 its freedom if speech but since its not ok for some people to have it in your world guess if your speech is challenge you want it to me that is not fare just don't watch.
Its called rating dope the liberals failed in radio because they talk about the same crap on TV. On the ohter hand conservatives ratings are better because people would like to here the other side at times its not being fair its ratings. Why do you think Air America Died maybe because you se it on TV every signal day.
You can if you are providing something that people want. You cannot have it both ways-either you want the government to run radio or the free market to do it. The only reason the FD is wanted is the same as Affirmative Action-they think people need help to compete. News Flash: liberals cannot compete in radio and they whine to the government to assist them with their failed business models. Air America would be the perfect example of this. If AA was so great, it would survive on it's own.
Radio does not belong to the democratic party. You have no right to make your political message the one and only message by claiming TV, newspapers and radio. The people you speak of have decided what it is they want to hear. You want a new law that would deny the people the right to listen to somone other than you.
The fact that there's more positive stories about Obama doesn't suggest a media bias, it suggests that there's more positive stories on Obama than McCain. The coverage on McCain IS more negetive, but that's because McCain keeps f-ing up! The coverage on Britney Spears is more negetive than the coverage on Oprah Winfrey too. Is that because of a media bias, or because Britney Spears is a mess? Right-wing arguments make no sense, they're just designed to convince people who are too dumb to notice.
Democrats are the new Nazis.
flyingtorpedo 3 years ago
For the truth about the Fairness Doctrine go to thefairnessdoctrineDOTcc
backobeyond 3 years ago
That Fox News hack all of a sudden talks about the "Constitution" when Bush has been trampling over it for 8 years by wiretapping ordinary American phones. Now all of a sudden they give a shit. My question to Mike Papantonio is you NEED TO STOP them from interrupting you. It's rude and it's what they do to liberals all the time to stop you from answering.
rakrobn 3 years ago
are you 8 years old? because wiretapping has always been happening, as long as we've had phones buddy. it keeps dipshits like you safe everyday. Why has it come up now? because jerkoffs with sour grapes for the past 8 years at the new york times wanted to get bush on something, its fucking bullshit
mongoose63124 3 years ago
No shit mongoose63124, but do you know what WARRANTLESS wiretapping is? It's one of those things that protects you it's called the CONSTITUTION. You must really hate America.
rakrobn 3 years ago
no i love america, im just a realist, if you hate wiretapping, then blame everyone, not just W....just trying to help you people to not immeadiately discount your arguemnts for seeing you as an in the tank liberal
mongoose63124 3 years ago
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Ben Franklin
GWB was the only one who advocated WARRANTLESS wiretapping and even on ordinary Americans. We will find out soon enough about who he did it to, probably on his political enemies. Don't worry you being a right wing mouthbreather is enough to discount your argument. Try reading the U.S. Constitution sometime you might like it.
rakrobn 3 years ago
"GWB was the only one who advocated WARRANTLESS wiretapping and even on ordinary Americans. "
rakrobn, you know nothing....and you;'re a fucking moron........i understand being a liberal, you have no concept of solving real world problems, but trust me on this one
mongoose63124 3 years ago
Yeah, keep thinking that bitch. Is that why the Bush administration is not releasing any of its emails like OTHER presidents do, when it has no classified information? Right. Hope you like your Democratic House and Senate. Keep it up and it will be that way for decades.
rakrobn 3 years ago
ummm how many other presidents have had email besides W? 1, you fucking moron, 1. You dont think clinton had wiretaps, hahaha
mongoose63124 3 years ago
You dumb mongoose, Clinton had wiretaps, the only difference is he OBEYED THE LAW, and obtained warrants just like EVERYONE ELSE does. Email has been for a while now, not just GWB. Are you still so dense that the distinction I'm making is getting a WARRANT vs. NOT getting a warrant? I didn't say NOT to do wiretaps. Did you eat paintchips as a child?
rakrobn 3 years ago
"You dumb mongoose,"
how ironic....every president had illegal wiretaps, i dont expect you to believe that because you are an in the tank liberal
mongoose63124 3 years ago
Whatever you say tinfoil hat mongoose.
rakrobn 3 years ago
funny how you libs believe every negative accusation about W, yet wont about anyone else, do you not want to be taken seriously? or do you just not care?
mongoose63124 3 years ago
@mongoose63124
Hindsaight's a bitch.
i.e. Birther movement.
BlakeLBoggs 1 year ago
liberal media takeover
delphi270 3 years ago
So if the Fairness Doctrine is instituted, does that mean that if you have a show about the Holocaust, you have to have a person who denies the Holocaust along with a person who believes it happened? This scenario proves how ridiculous and untenable the Doctrine is! Let the free market work! If someone wants to start a station for Druids, they should be able to do that. But if people don't want to listen to Druids on the radio, the station should fail just like Air America! Government keep out!!
thinkingrationally 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Say NO To The Fairness Doctrine!
Say YES To Free Speech!
Please Sign The Petition!
mrcaction (dot) org
FreedomLives1776 3 years ago
She talks over the guest..and won't allow a complete answer..that is why I say ..She is probly drunk
No decent person acts like that
Fox news is just no good drunks
LostLadyElgin 3 years ago
hey ikf661 its freedom if speech but since its not ok for some people to have it in your world guess if your speech is challenge you want it to me that is not fare just don't watch.
jp3711nc1 3 years ago
public airway... the frequencys that radio and television, broadcast the siganal on
belong to the Americian people. Hence you can't hog all the wavelegnth just to broadcast your own message
LostLadyElgin 3 years ago
Its called rating dope the liberals failed in radio because they talk about the same crap on TV. On the ohter hand conservatives ratings are better because people would like to here the other side at times its not being fair its ratings. Why do you think Air America Died maybe because you se it on TV every signal day.
jp3711nc1 3 years ago 2
You can if you are providing something that people want. You cannot have it both ways-either you want the government to run radio or the free market to do it. The only reason the FD is wanted is the same as Affirmative Action-they think people need help to compete. News Flash: liberals cannot compete in radio and they whine to the government to assist them with their failed business models. Air America would be the perfect example of this. If AA was so great, it would survive on it's own.
thinkingrationally 3 years ago
"the Americian people"
Radio does not belong to the democratic party. You have no right to make your political message the one and only message by claiming TV, newspapers and radio. The people you speak of have decided what it is they want to hear. You want a new law that would deny the people the right to listen to somone other than you.
jackbelias 3 years ago 2
we do not need the "fairness doctern" we need fair & ballanced news coverage. Hold the major networks responcible. Boycott them & their sponsors.
blueyes1947 3 years ago
The fact that there's more positive stories about Obama doesn't suggest a media bias, it suggests that there's more positive stories on Obama than McCain. The coverage on McCain IS more negetive, but that's because McCain keeps f-ing up! The coverage on Britney Spears is more negetive than the coverage on Oprah Winfrey too. Is that because of a media bias, or because Britney Spears is a mess? Right-wing arguments make no sense, they're just designed to convince people who are too dumb to notice.
little1laura 3 years ago
She kept talking over...Mike
They do that...That is the way of Fox
For Gods sake why do you talk to Fox.
There is no point in giving them your time
LostLadyElgin 3 years ago
because of dodging answers she wants them to me you don't want freedom of speech on both sides don't watch then.
jp3711nc1 3 years ago
She is a rude over bearing drunk ass
LostLadyElgin 3 years ago
and the guess they usually have are rude to so it work both ways dogeared question is rude because they want answer it.
jp3711nc1 3 years ago
Mike! Why do you keep going on FixedNews and getting yourself sandbagged?
ikfb661 3 years ago