our army do not even half of that stuff the best we have are submarines with nuke but there to repel nukes fired at us and we would never do this to any europe country or america idk about any other
Disturbing news, entire argentine amphibious special forces has formed on shore at rio gallegos
there launch was slightly delayed as they both could not decide which one had to sit by the taps, with their tactical equipment containing one oar and a bath plug the argentine navy departed to the excitement of the crowd, armed with a surface to air spud gun battle with the UK navy is expected to be brief, before landing on the falklands and greeted as liberators by the oppressed Falklanders.
@882here Chieftain/Challenger 1 and 2/Scorpion/Scimitar/Seawolf/Astute SSN/Rapier/tracked rapier/Warrior/sa80/Latest type45 Destroyer/Apache(built under licence to a superior spec to the US version/Lynx (worlds fastest helicoptor....STILL). The list goes on. Sod off and play with you dolly.
I think they plan to replace the SA80 with the Vileda Super mop next year as part of the 2012 slim-lining and budgeting plan. Their still recruiting though according to the ads on TV but their laying off 30,000 or whatever - hows that work then???
@TheFluffy47 the majority of people their laying off are long serving military personal with a good pension so they wouldn't be that concerned about leaving which means there is room for some new blood to join
dopey vid. Jaguars went yrs ago. Victors went years ago, Tornado is out of theater and what the hell is an Antanov doing in there? Apaches arent in theater etc etc etc.
@mariocart1471 As far as I remember, this video came out on a Falklands Islands defence link. Thats why I flagged Tornado/Apache as out. Still,lets move on. A/C carriers, we have none. Harriers, we have none, Jaguars, we have none, ANTANOV..WHAT was that doing in there, its RUSSIAN!! If youre gonna back Britmil (and I was 2 Para for 24 yrs), at least do a bit more research otherwise you will get crucified on here.
@mwillis1000 stfu. what we should do brits and america and all the other countries should concentrate on prevent a nuclear bombs being created, otherwise we all screwed.
Why do my parents have to be related because a bored little prick on the internet wants an argument? :3
Dude it's not my fault looking at your profile that between alternating metallica and justin bieber videos on youtube and living on that absolute floating piece of crap which you can walk across in a couple hours that you're mad no one pays attention to you.
And if you don't care why the heck are you on a video about British war weapons. Such a troll..
lol stfu you idiot. My grandfather was in the war too. Along with a few other family members too. You're just an egotisical idiot who most likely gets his facts off the sun or something. Read real history instead of the spoon-fed shit you're given. :) And how am i wrong? It IS called a world war yes. Then why is it every american goes "oh yeah england wouldnt exist if we didn't save your ass" lawlll.. They have no idea how much we suffered and fought and are self-obsessed arrogant idiots.
@LebenVergessen Jesus Christ, you're a dumb fucking cunt. Were your parents blood-related? Is that why you're so fucked up in the head, you stupid inbred piece of shit? Yeah, obviously every single American says that. Kind of like how you Brits say we joined at the "last second" of the war. Neither are true, but way to promote stereotypes, dipshit.
America and Britian pay for all this military R&D even when their economies are about to crumble
China on the other hand waits patiently until the technology either lands up in their laps or they somehow manage to steal/buy it. Just look at the RQ-170, Americas top of the line stealth and drone technology which they spent billions on R&D, is now in the hands of the Chinese. They are playing it smart
How many of these weapons and machinery is actually british??? I think you will find, not many!!! I am British myself, why is our governments buying shitloads of ammunition, weapons and machinery from the likes of the US, Europe and Israel??? Without these countries, we wouldnt have the capabilities we do now, does that make Britain dependant and reliant on these countries???
We might be a small island in the middle of the sea, but bloody hell- mess with us, and we can be a great big thorn in your side...History is proof of that.
@JCARegal The Anglo-Zanzibar war: the shortest war in history, lasting only 30 minutes. Despite being heavily outnumbered by Zanzibaris with cannons, maxims and gatlings, the British won. The war resulted in over 500 Zanzibari casualties, but only one injured British soldier.
I reckon, right, that the EU should just give the UK their defence budgets and the British Armed Forces could be like 5 times the size and look after all of europe.
Dk why every video is UK and USA arguing with each other... Yeah america came into the war at the last second and claimed a victory but in this current time USA and UK and huge alleys and friends.
Learn to love each other because we're fighting together in places like Afghanistan and the middle east. & as a combined force it would create an Immovable object.
@LebenVergessen Last second of the war? What the fuck are you talking about, dude? My grandfather spent three and a half years fighting against the Japanese in the jungles and mangrove swamps of the Pacific. Would you tell him that he only fought during the "last second" of the war?
@ShittyMcShitfuck Lol apart from your most likely bull-shitting story. What exactly is fighting in Japan doing to help europe and Britain win the war? British and Indian forces were also fighting against Japanese aswell. Yet USA acts like they did everything.. zzz
@LebenVergessen Is that the best you can come up with? You don't want to admit when you're wrong so you accuse me of bullshitting about my own family history? That's pathetic. Anyway, if you would get your head out of your eurocentric ass for just one moment, you might realize there is a reason why it's called WORLD War II. It wasn't fought in just Europe. In fact, the Japanese were fighting the Chinese years before Germany invaded Poland.
@ShittyMcShitfuck Listen mate, you only came in in dec 41 (which is 42 near as damn it) Wed been fighting on our own since 39. so mate, as usual, the yanks (you) are talking bollox. at the MOST, your grandad could have been fighting 3 1/2 yrs and THAT was if he was present at Pearl and he fought till the end of the war and never took a day off!!. Where were you from 39 till 42?
OK hypothetically in a war Britain would lose. But Brits would never surrender america would have a guerilla war on their hands and end up having to kill every last brit before victory was finally achieved. it would just be so much blood shed on both sides eventually america would pull out.
i see alot of hatred&jealousy below..mainly by yanks lol...come on america we maybe a small nation but we have proven time and time again that we not to be fuck't with..now let's be friends
Yet again shall the British Army Rise and Take Control, and for USA to stand down as they can't take this job seriously.....Us British could rule the world if we didn't have such shit government, no money (in debt) and if all the population actualy took stand for their Sovereignty State (UK). If we clear out the foreigners (some can stay as they helped us in the past, e.g Polish, they fought in our spitfires and cleared alot of the nazis from taking over Britain. RULE BRITANNIA ONCE AGAIN !
also russia deserves more respect since most of hitlers forces were in the eastern borders coz russia they were amazing damn russians lol but yes the real herious of the world war were the south africans lol
countries) coz attacks from greese india and so forth commanded by brits were still going on but from uk itself didnt happen coz germany hit england hard yes wen usa arrived in england usa commence d massive bombings in berlin america lost shit loads of planes and pretty got no where with those attacks so who commanded the usa air force over europe the brits did yes usa beat japan on thier own and with thier own tactics and stuff but as for europe the brits commanded most of the usa forces
thier navy within weeks and we would all be speaking german right now so yes usa did help in ww2 but saved us no hitler attacked england for one purpose coz hitler knew he would loose he attacked england on set days set times and moment kinda like pattern if u dnt believe look it up he attacked becouse he wanted to get rid of england attacking force if u look at the dates wen the usa didnt arrive in the uk to replenish the numbers attacks from england from the the mainland (uk not commen wealth)
but yes if he did keep tht treaty he wouldnt need to focus most of his armies on the eastern borders and would of had more focus wit the brits and greeks from the south and of course america and if he really had hhis head in the game he could of helped japan aswell wit the usa and if hitler won the battle of britian amerca wouldnt be able to attack europe the usa navy and airforce would be screwed were they fly thier planes on carriours no germany in tht time was way to smart usa would loose
i was reading somments and 1 comment was tht america saved the world in WW2 hahaha wat tht is bullshit lets look at it this way hitler was a smart wierd racist cunt even tho he was a basterd but he was smart yes not everyone is perfect so he did make mistakes (big one trying to take russia during the winter lol) if hitler kept the treaty between russia and germany coz russia just gt out of tht cival war the revolution thing with the royal families in russia i think it was during or just before
in a brit, but i think usa would propably beat us in a head on war due to superior size.number ect and the amount of money that goes into their department of defence. but look at it in proportion: tiny britain took over half the world and huge america couldnt beat vietnam. historically we're touch little fuckers
More advanced army? Please. The main battle tanks of the US army use first generation delpleted uranium armour while the Challenger 2 of the British Army uses Second generation Chobham/Dorchester Level 2 (classified) armour which has three times the tensile strength of steel.
@NobleTeamMIA and we currently operate the most advanced nuclear submarines and anti air ships aka the type 45's, and our weapons company BAE is making tanks invisble to aircrafts using a new technology called Adaptiv it can turn the tank into its scenery and even a cow, and oour eurofighter when tested with a F-22 eliminated it and during a simulated flyingf test it shaked off 2 F16's then went in for a simulated kill and was success they are just bigger not better.
@TheGunner1324 well type 45 is the best ss destroyer around not very versatile thou
chalenger is better than m1 and leo 2 hands down
but not to ruin your day the eurofighter was shot down in exercises by the grippens (part brit plain) and and that is really hurtful by the areo alca (twice)
@janak19771977 the eurofighter is not only 50 million pounds cheap than the F-22 it also doesnt take hundreds of hours of maintence after each flight, the F-22 cannot fly in the rain and there very stuborn to get flying once they are in the air when its not raining and when its not in maitence then yes there one of the best but eurofighter doesnt come with all them inconviences.
type 45 is not versatile in ship to ship capabillties but is soon to be fitted with some state of the art weapons.
if usa and the brits went to war not only will the EU join the brits so would the comenwealth countries like australia and new zealand india south africa and even canada would join the brits coz canada is part of the comen wealth treaty
@janak19771977 allied against UK yeh USA allways the good guys and are you stupid we have a millitary pact with france we like each other we didnt over 600 years ago you turd, and we have good diplomatic relations with with france, germany and the rest of the EU apart from a couple, and by the way france and italy have really good armys now and with the econemic power of the EU which is bigger than the US's we would win esspecially if we bring in the common wealth, epic fail uncle sam.
@janak19771977 and look it up for hundreds of years we have been out numbered by the enemies and yet we win. 3 examples: 1) rorkes drift (100 brits verses around 4000-5000, they had rifles from pevious battles) 2) battle of britain (they had more aircrafts and had the privilage of sleep) 3) Battle of Gravelines ( simple fishermen won the battle- english victory)
@Jordan123irving no not really too be honnest im not sure who would win but the brits have a shit load more of exsperiance in wars and we all know history repeats itself wat my point is tht you dnt need a massive army to win wars a massive army does help dnt get me it does help look at englands war history they fucked everyone. they have battled armies 10 times thier size and won so wat im trying to say yes america might have numbers but englands got exsperiance as to who would win i donno
@robertleonardriley Yep. And if for any reason the USA president ordered the queen to be assassinated then this would by law happen. Either the president is hung or the commonwealth declares war on America, and we all know that europe would have to pick a side which would be britain. And im sure China would see their chance too, and help britain. So basically . . . Don't fuck with the Queen or you'll die!
@robertleonardriley I don't hate the USA, but thought id add to the comment. There are Americans that are ass holes, but there are a lot of nice Americans too, same everywhere in the world. Still glad I'm British though, lot of pride in the country, but not the British government lol
@robertleonardriley And any Brit has the most pride for the SAS and SBS, people can argue as much as they like that Seals or any other special forces are better but the fact is the SAS were the first modern day elite squad and trained other nations elite. Therefore in my eyes they are unmatched in skill. No question in that.
@GoDZELiiTE i agree i heard sas can stay in ur house for 3 months and u wouldnt even know they there but its just a rumur and for other coment dude i fell in love with an american girl im not american or british im south african and hold nothing against both countries im just writing my thoughts on this subject but yeah if u think the english goverment is bad look at south africas goverment they all came from robin island lol
@robertleonardriley Probably could do, but there better and getting in and out without people knowing there there, and wouldn't stick around lol By the sounds of it all governments are shit lol
@robertleonardriley plus british forces are the most highly trained in the world, if an even number of british and USA went to war we would blaitantly have the advantage :)
@robertleonardriley How many of those countries join US and the UK in Iraq? People who just speak one language (English) are so complacent ignorant. They are happy by knowing so little about the rest of the world. Like Bush, he never had a passport before becoming president!! HAHAHAHA!
what seriously you think the britts are that daft to give our nuke codes out even though we are against nukes even though if we do have them they will be well disarmed and yous couldnt even win the war yous started with japan Nagasaki and harushamer you couldn handle it when they bombed perall harbour in ask us for help so we did help and yous have a cheek to say yous won it lmao in wiki links dosent always tells you the truth so check your history and go back to skool as we no how to combat
Look out folks, here comes the return of the British E(va)mpire contemplating on re-conquering the world in the name of peace keeping. They done it before, no surprise that they won't do it again.
China, wake up!! The brits might bring these battle ships to your shores to start a Cocaine War, like the Opium War, and a list of unequal treaties favoring the brits.
I think the last operational Bloodhound unit was in Switzerland and it stood down in 1999, although there is still one unit that the Swiss have preserved as a monument in a place called Gubel.
why do people even talk about a us uk war??? it would never happen ever, becuase it is the british that founded the usa, in all respects, and almost all white americans are of european decent.... plus we are the worlds closest allies... however, we would kick the shit out of all others!! nice
Yes the US spend more on military technology. But in terms of innovation, please don't compare. Everything the US does is upgrade already existsing conventional ideas.
jesus, can you stop saying america saved blah blah blah's ass. If britain had lost the battle of britain, america would have been nuked the fuck out of. So they saved themselves and saved your own freedom at the same time.
Britain is great we would've fought to the end in WWII but lets face it, in truth without (unfortunately) the Soviet Union us, America and the rest of the Allies would've been destroyed in France, Germany only commited 2 Armies to defending captured France, the majority of their forces were in the Soviet states. But we still held on against really bad odds before USA joined us and Dunkurk is a brilliant example of British spirit and self sacrifice
@DerBotoxPapst with what? the harriers that the brits designed, the carriers that are from british designs, the army that is based on british army, the special forces that have been trained by british special forces, or the nukes that both the countries use? its alright saying the yanks wud...but they wouldnt be able to get here, america however has a nation 50 times as large as the uk but an armed forces 10 times as big....so u have more area to defend with less people....INIT
@numba1danman I'm Canadian, so I'm being impartial here. I like both America and Britain. But if those two countries went to war, I think it's clear that the USA would win. They just have too many advantages. They have a much larger and more advanced Army, Navy and Air Force. Plus a larger economy and industrial base. As someone else pointed out, the USA has the launch codes to Britain's nukes. Anyways, I think we should all be glad we're friends and focus on the real enemy... IRAN! :-P
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf usa doesnt whatsoever have the codes to our nukes, the uk however controls vital bases for americas nuclear systems, any powere with nuclear weapons can only be as strong as the other, a war which would never happen of course, and in fantasy terms a war without nukes ....they wud win,.....but they wud never overcome britain..u have 60 million people on this island well equppied, supplied and ready to fight....nearly 1,000 years since the last invasion...come and get it.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Firslty although the USA army is much bigger, there is no technology gap between them and the UK. If the USA and UK went to war it would be the end of both countrys and quite possibly the world. Like you said let's be thankful we are partners forming the most powerful military force around.
@ConConzz Of course there is a technology gap. The United States spends more on military tech than any other nation on Earth. They are constantly developing and improving their weaponry and aircraft. Take the stealth helicopter that debuted at the Bin Laden raid for example. You can laugh all you want, the Americans do have your nuclear launch codes and the serial numbers to your missles. In fact, it wasn't very long ago that the USA shared this information with the Russians.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf the us have the british launch codes lol? Im sure mi6 could tell when your president goes to take a shit if they wanted to. The CIA would fail to do anything like fail to know about 9/11 lmao. STFU with your crap.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf we have a prime minister and use parliament to. It's because we invented it. And for us citizens over here, the 7/7 bombings don't really add up. And mi6/mi5 probably did know someting about them, just didn't act.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf You are mad mate, USA do not have control over UK Nuclear missiles otherwise the UK wouldn't run there own nuclear program via the Royal Navy submarine fleet. You do realise UK hold Nuclear technology by themselves? and was actually joint-operation with the americans during the cold war? There is obviously no way on earth any country would leave there nuclear bombs in the hands of a another nation (BTW the sharing infomation with Russia is comedy gold)
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf As i said, your link is useless and tells us nothing i already didn't know. US AND UK both know about each other nuclear infomation, doesn't mean we share the bloody launch codes.
Trident Coded Control Devices are fitted to all U.S. SSBNs.These devices prevented an attack until a launch code had been sent by the Chiefs of Staff on behalf of the President. The UK said they took the decision not to install Trident CCDs on the grounds that an aggressor might be able to wipe out chain of command.But the truth is they wanted to put their OWN system & code stucture inplace.
@TrentVenture Well said. The likely way a nuclear attack would be authoised would be the Polaris plan. Although that might be updated by now! Comedy deluded stuff from Jimmy burton though lmao!
@ConConzz Not surprising all of you commenting to me are British. I know it's a hard pill for you lot to swallow, but yes the Americans do have your nuclear launch codes, and yes their military technology is more advanced. Cheers.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Why are you trying to get that idea in our heads, when you know full well it is not true? American do know senstive infomation about the UK Nuclear Arsenal, but it works vica versa. A huge amount of American Nuclear missles are held at a RAF base in England actually, not trident either.
@ConConzz What idea am I trying to instill into your head? Reality? The US knows almost every detail about the UK's nuclear arsenal and they've exchanged some of this other information with other countries.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf They exchanged some details regarding Missles they supply the UK for Nuclear bombs to russia, that is it.
Stop making stuff up, and get the idea out of your head that USA have the UK Launch codes, IT WOULD BE NO USE TO THE USA WHATS SO EVER. American have the ability to launch a bomb anywhere in the world on there selfs, without our trident nuclear programme!
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf You say the US knows almost every detail re. the UK`s nuclear arsenal and they`ve exchanged some of this ( other info ) with other countries. Who told you this ?
@valarmanwe Hey. Yes, the United States shared details of Britain's nuclear program with Russia as part of the New START treaty. This was revealed by WIkiLeaks back in February.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Not more advanced, but they are better supplied with fuel and have more men to throw at us.
Having a battle between the US and GB would end with MASSIVE loss of life on both sides, yes, I concede a war with the US has a slim chance of going well for us, luckily we are allies, and people should stop bringing this topic up.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Im british and agree the yanks would win. Purely because of their numbers, its fact that the british armed forces are the best trained in the world. After all we do train many of the worlds military including some aspects of the americans. The US do not have the UK,s nuke codes, dont be so naive. Just before world war two the US was preparing a war against the brits and canada. secert file "Joint Plan Red," the results showed that there would more likely be a deadlock.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf I only disagree with some things, they arent more advanced, and if they had the launch code to our nuclear missile, then they could launch at someone to start a world war, NO country has our launch codes, you are misguided to think that.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Actually that's not true. Many people overlook this fact, but Great Britain has the Commonwealth, a collection of 54 countries all around the world. With each country having its own army and all swearing loyalty to the Queen, we have the US out gunned, not to mention surrounded. Although I do wish the America Military would get out of the UK. They have bases all around our country, maybe more than we do, not to mention the CIA facilities.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf are you stupid?Launch codes for UK missiles?haha did you even know that your special forces as many other in the world are based of the SAS?Counter-terrorism is written by the brits?you can only wish for the bullshit you have writen..
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Nobody who knows how Britains nukes actually work would tell you how ignorant you are. The UK does not operate like the yanks. US would win from numbers, but individually they are significantly faster in the mouth and slower in all other ways.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf The british armed forces is as advanced as the usa,s in many fields and is powerfull,the usa,s armed forces it a lot bigger and more powerfull ofc.
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf The european Union has our Launch codes however we can launch them if we deem it necessary but if the UK and the USA went to war all of European Would join in due the EU and The EU Combined has a larger Army, Larger Economy, A MUCH Larger Industrial base however this is all Pointless because we Brits and you Yankies will Never go to war with each other
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf no, are you stupid launch codes to britains nukes jesus talk about armerican propganda, we can only rely on the US to launch the missles weapons, why would they have our codes, jesus and even then only around half of our nukes would rely on the US that means we still got around 100 nuclear weapons that britain can operate indepedently without the US assistance, i heard some thing in the past but thats gotta be the funniest.
@DerBotoxPapst hhaha I don't think so, we have nuclear submarines in the Atlantic, America would dare try anything because they are afraid we will nuke the shit out of you.
@bittersweetcum ...have gone ahead. ( You were not in the war when it actually did happen and I do not think it would have happened had you been. When it did go ahead Hitler only had Britain to think of). So, our thesis must ask would Russia and Germany actually be fighting . That would, IMO, depend on the noises from Roosevelt on Britains defeat.
@bittersweetcum The simple fact I am trying to make is that, irrespective of America's capabilities, had Britain not held out against Germany in 1940, WW2 would have been very different if ,indeed , it became a world war.
@bittersweetcum (wrong button ) As I was saying. ...Given that fact, Britain did play it's part and it was a descisive part. Holding out in 1940 was the foundation of all that followed (in Europe anyway)
02:41 another blue on blue incident... oh wait he's RAF XD.
MrXclio 1 day ago
@MrXclio haha what
MrShawzyxx 5 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UK-British General-Argentina could try to take our airstrip
UK-Argentines organise mass vote to flood online UK newspaper pole.
Chile-Arg. flight proposal is "attempt to look less mean"
EU-seeking clarification on Arg. boycott of UK goods, as act against EU trade.
Arg-Vice pres. "Get Falklands back"
Arg-govt. pressures Union boss over mass strikes,govt investigates his family.
Arg-chubut prov, defy govt. on cruises
Arg.govt.-blocks UK imports,Capital Mayor "THIS IS NOT A DEMOCRACY"
ashyk72 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UK aid to argentina = £457 million over 12 years, in development aid yet Argentina has £50B in reserves, UK citizens face cut backs across the board.
why financial aid to a middle rich country? let alone ones who are so against The Falklands right to exist?
If like me you are concerned,The UK government website has an e-petition.
google: Overseas Aid Assessment
please sign the e-petition and facebook this message, aid should not fund a hostile government in regular income.
Thank you.
ashyk72 3 days ago
UKIP are the only current party with any real military spending policy a vote for UKIP is a vote for the British military and much else besides.
MrDeludedPenguin 4 days ago
maybe we do srry but we are not planning to attack anyone
cooldude15634 5 days ago
our army do not even half of that stuff the best we have are submarines with nuke but there to repel nukes fired at us and we would never do this to any europe country or america idk about any other
cooldude15634 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Disturbing news, entire argentine amphibious special forces has formed on shore at rio gallegos
there launch was slightly delayed as they both could not decide which one had to sit by the taps, with their tactical equipment containing one oar and a bath plug the argentine navy departed to the excitement of the crowd, armed with a surface to air spud gun battle with the UK navy is expected to be brief, before landing on the falklands and greeted as liberators by the oppressed Falklanders.
ShitStirring 6 days ago
0:44 Thats a russian II-76, far from British.
smithyboi6 1 week ago
yeah im coming! COMING TO CHANGE YOU INTO A VAMPIRE! just kidding!
dogsinbad 1 week ago
0:59 I know what i want for christmas
cadettaff112 1 week ago
*actually the British Armed Forces opposed to military, but im guessing your a yank so ill let you off
thegadgetguy100 1 week ago
@882here Chieftain/Challenger 1 and 2/Scorpion/Scimitar/Seawolf/Astute SSN/Rapier/tracked rapier/Warrior/sa80/Latest type45 Destroyer/Apache(built under licence to a superior spec to the US version/Lynx (worlds fastest helicoptor....STILL). The list goes on. Sod off and play with you dolly.
stubbostubbs 1 week ago
What child put this up? Go back to school.
MrDickWarrior 2 weeks ago
I think they plan to replace the SA80 with the Vileda Super mop next year as part of the 2012 slim-lining and budgeting plan. Their still recruiting though according to the ads on TV but their laying off 30,000 or whatever - hows that work then???
TheFluffy47 3 weeks ago 2
@TheFluffy47 the majority of people their laying off are long serving military personal with a good pension so they wouldn't be that concerned about leaving which means there is room for some new blood to join
houselamp1 2 weeks ago
@TheFluffy47 What are you saying, that the SA80 is crap? \stand up and let me fire one at you. I think youll find its not a bad piece of kit.
stubbostubbs 1 week ago
come on now lads shut the fuck up UK & USA are brothers they will never ever ever go to war with each other
Boro1Legend 3 weeks ago 4
Rule Britannia!
Temarinecromancer 3 weeks ago
Thats stupid Great Britain and America are the most powerful countrys in the world and are allies
gabriel25gatens 3 weeks ago 4
@gabriel25gatens damn straight
ImSoUncreative 2 weeks ago
@gabriel25gatens You mean the UK and USA.
blueray1969 1 week ago
dopey vid. Jaguars went yrs ago. Victors went years ago, Tornado is out of theater and what the hell is an Antanov doing in there? Apaches arent in theater etc etc etc.
stubbostubbs 1 month ago
@stubbostubbs
tornado is not out of theatre .... look at Libya as an example ... Apache ARE also in theatre ... !!!!
mariocart1471 1 week ago
@mariocart1471 As far as I remember, this video came out on a Falklands Islands defence link. Thats why I flagged Tornado/Apache as out. Still,lets move on. A/C carriers, we have none. Harriers, we have none, Jaguars, we have none, ANTANOV..WHAT was that doing in there, its RUSSIAN!! If youre gonna back Britmil (and I was 2 Para for 24 yrs), at least do a bit more research otherwise you will get crucified on here.
stubbostubbs 1 week ago
I am British, Im proud to be British, I love my country and fuck you if you don`t, I will serve my country till the end. Rule Britannia.
Elitepoosniff 1 month ago 3
Come at us France!
mwillis1000 2 months ago
@mwillis1000 stfu. what we should do brits and america and all the other countries should concentrate on prevent a nuclear bombs being created, otherwise we all screwed.
MLGmishmashh 1 month ago
@MLGmishmashh
We should keep our nukes, so that we can defend ourselves against nukes fired at us.
But anyway, France would get their arses kicked against us (Again).
mwillis1000 1 month ago 15
@mwillis1000 how does a nuke help defend us against another nuke?
blueray1969 1 week ago
@blueray1969 Because a country is less likely to fire a nuke at a country,that has nukes because you can fire a nuke back at them.
TheLloydA1 1 week ago
@TheLloydA1
Actually due to Ballistic Missiles gaining a >90% hit chance, Nukes will soon be irrelevant.
RyanBrooksby 1 week ago
@RyanBrooksby Which Ballistic Missile System obtains a 90% hit chance against short and medium range Nuclear Ballistic missiles?.
BigWilki123321 1 week ago
@mwillis1000
we have over 200 nukes active ready for a nuclear attack (UK)
TheDzOasis 2 days ago
Why do my parents have to be related because a bored little prick on the internet wants an argument? :3
Dude it's not my fault looking at your profile that between alternating metallica and justin bieber videos on youtube and living on that absolute floating piece of crap which you can walk across in a couple hours that you're mad no one pays attention to you.
And if you don't care why the heck are you on a video about British war weapons. Such a troll..
LebenVergessen 2 months ago 6
lol stfu you idiot. My grandfather was in the war too. Along with a few other family members too. You're just an egotisical idiot who most likely gets his facts off the sun or something. Read real history instead of the spoon-fed shit you're given. :) And how am i wrong? It IS called a world war yes. Then why is it every american goes "oh yeah england wouldnt exist if we didn't save your ass" lawlll.. They have no idea how much we suffered and fought and are self-obsessed arrogant idiots.
LebenVergessen 2 months ago
@LebenVergessen Jesus Christ, you're a dumb fucking cunt. Were your parents blood-related? Is that why you're so fucked up in the head, you stupid inbred piece of shit? Yeah, obviously every single American says that. Kind of like how you Brits say we joined at the "last second" of the war. Neither are true, but way to promote stereotypes, dipshit.
ShittyMcShitfuck 2 months ago
America and Britian pay for all this military R&D even when their economies are about to crumble
China on the other hand waits patiently until the technology either lands up in their laps or they somehow manage to steal/buy it. Just look at the RQ-170, Americas top of the line stealth and drone technology which they spent billions on R&D, is now in the hands of the Chinese. They are playing it smart
muchookees 2 months ago
yanks all the gear no idea... GREAT BRITAIN 2-0 in world wars enough said
SPIELBERGNORTHEAST 2 months ago
How many of these weapons and machinery is actually british??? I think you will find, not many!!! I am British myself, why is our governments buying shitloads of ammunition, weapons and machinery from the likes of the US, Europe and Israel??? Without these countries, we wouldnt have the capabilities we do now, does that make Britain dependant and reliant on these countries???
M1N191 2 months ago
@M1N191 Stupid boy Pike. The UK armaments industry is about the 4th or 5th biggest arms exporter in the world...Prick
stubbostubbs 1 week ago
We might be a small island in the middle of the sea, but bloody hell- mess with us, and we can be a great big thorn in your side...History is proof of that.
JCARegal 2 months ago
@JCARegal The Anglo-Zanzibar war: the shortest war in history, lasting only 30 minutes. Despite being heavily outnumbered by Zanzibaris with cannons, maxims and gatlings, the British won. The war resulted in over 500 Zanzibari casualties, but only one injured British soldier.
sockschappercat 2 months ago
I reckon, right, that the EU should just give the UK their defence budgets and the British Armed Forces could be like 5 times the size and look after all of europe.
VonPete105 2 months ago 2
@VonPete105 what a brilliant idea....quality and quantity....scary
ronsiris 2 months ago
Dk why every video is UK and USA arguing with each other... Yeah america came into the war at the last second and claimed a victory but in this current time USA and UK and huge alleys and friends.
Learn to love each other because we're fighting together in places like Afghanistan and the middle east. & as a combined force it would create an Immovable object.
LebenVergessen 2 months ago
@LebenVergessen Last second of the war? What the fuck are you talking about, dude? My grandfather spent three and a half years fighting against the Japanese in the jungles and mangrove swamps of the Pacific. Would you tell him that he only fought during the "last second" of the war?
ShittyMcShitfuck 2 months ago
@ShittyMcShitfuck Lol apart from your most likely bull-shitting story. What exactly is fighting in Japan doing to help europe and Britain win the war? British and Indian forces were also fighting against Japanese aswell. Yet USA acts like they did everything.. zzz
LebenVergessen 2 months ago
@LebenVergessen Is that the best you can come up with? You don't want to admit when you're wrong so you accuse me of bullshitting about my own family history? That's pathetic. Anyway, if you would get your head out of your eurocentric ass for just one moment, you might realize there is a reason why it's called WORLD War II. It wasn't fought in just Europe. In fact, the Japanese were fighting the Chinese years before Germany invaded Poland.
ShittyMcShitfuck 2 months ago
@ShittyMcShitfuck Listen mate, you only came in in dec 41 (which is 42 near as damn it) Wed been fighting on our own since 39. so mate, as usual, the yanks (you) are talking bollox. at the MOST, your grandad could have been fighting 3 1/2 yrs and THAT was if he was present at Pearl and he fought till the end of the war and never took a day off!!. Where were you from 39 till 42?
stubbostubbs 1 week ago
Green thumb all to believe that the British Army is the best.
ILuvNYForevver 2 months ago 5
OK hypothetically in a war Britain would lose. But Brits would never surrender america would have a guerilla war on their hands and end up having to kill every last brit before victory was finally achieved. it would just be so much blood shed on both sides eventually america would pull out.
eddy55ization 2 months ago
@eddy55ization In war against who? don't forget we have taken over most of the world many times.
GamingLogics 2 months ago
i see alot of hatred&jealousy below..mainly by yanks lol...come on america we maybe a small nation but we have proven time and time again that we not to be fuck't with..now let's be friends
weeguymo 2 months ago
fuc the yanks
MrCrazyguy747 2 months ago
there's a lot of British patriots here
guesswho14teen 2 months ago
Yet again shall the British Army Rise and Take Control, and for USA to stand down as they can't take this job seriously.....Us British could rule the world if we didn't have such shit government, no money (in debt) and if all the population actualy took stand for their Sovereignty State (UK). If we clear out the foreigners (some can stay as they helped us in the past, e.g Polish, they fought in our spitfires and cleared alot of the nazis from taking over Britain. RULE BRITANNIA ONCE AGAIN !
BassLoverDude 2 months ago
WE MAKE THE US LOOK SHIT
starnsboy 3 months ago
also russia deserves more respect since most of hitlers forces were in the eastern borders coz russia they were amazing damn russians lol but yes the real herious of the world war were the south africans lol
robertleonardriley 3 months ago
countries) coz attacks from greese india and so forth commanded by brits were still going on but from uk itself didnt happen coz germany hit england hard yes wen usa arrived in england usa commence d massive bombings in berlin america lost shit loads of planes and pretty got no where with those attacks so who commanded the usa air force over europe the brits did yes usa beat japan on thier own and with thier own tactics and stuff but as for europe the brits commanded most of the usa forces
robertleonardriley 3 months ago
thier navy within weeks and we would all be speaking german right now so yes usa did help in ww2 but saved us no hitler attacked england for one purpose coz hitler knew he would loose he attacked england on set days set times and moment kinda like pattern if u dnt believe look it up he attacked becouse he wanted to get rid of england attacking force if u look at the dates wen the usa didnt arrive in the uk to replenish the numbers attacks from england from the the mainland (uk not commen wealth)
robertleonardriley 3 months ago
but yes if he did keep tht treaty he wouldnt need to focus most of his armies on the eastern borders and would of had more focus wit the brits and greeks from the south and of course america and if he really had hhis head in the game he could of helped japan aswell wit the usa and if hitler won the battle of britian amerca wouldnt be able to attack europe the usa navy and airforce would be screwed were they fly thier planes on carriours no germany in tht time was way to smart usa would loose
robertleonardriley 3 months ago
i was reading somments and 1 comment was tht america saved the world in WW2 hahaha wat tht is bullshit lets look at it this way hitler was a smart wierd racist cunt even tho he was a basterd but he was smart yes not everyone is perfect so he did make mistakes (big one trying to take russia during the winter lol) if hitler kept the treaty between russia and germany coz russia just gt out of tht cival war the revolution thing with the royal families in russia i think it was during or just before
robertleonardriley 3 months ago
in a brit, but i think usa would propably beat us in a head on war due to superior size.number ect and the amount of money that goes into their department of defence. but look at it in proportion: tiny britain took over half the world and huge america couldnt beat vietnam. historically we're touch little fuckers
1471az 3 months ago
More advanced army? Please. The main battle tanks of the US army use first generation delpleted uranium armour while the Challenger 2 of the British Army uses Second generation Chobham/Dorchester Level 2 (classified) armour which has three times the tensile strength of steel.
NobleTeamMIA 3 months ago
@NobleTeamMIA and we currently operate the most advanced nuclear submarines and anti air ships aka the type 45's, and our weapons company BAE is making tanks invisble to aircrafts using a new technology called Adaptiv it can turn the tank into its scenery and even a cow, and oour eurofighter when tested with a F-22 eliminated it and during a simulated flyingf test it shaked off 2 F16's then went in for a simulated kill and was success they are just bigger not better.
TheGunner1324 3 months ago
@TheGunner1324 well type 45 is the best ss destroyer around not very versatile thou
chalenger is better than m1 and leo 2 hands down
but not to ruin your day the eurofighter was shot down in exercises by the grippens (part brit plain) and and that is really hurtful by the areo alca (twice)
janak19771977 3 months ago
@janak19771977 the eurofighter is not only 50 million pounds cheap than the F-22 it also doesnt take hundreds of hours of maintence after each flight, the F-22 cannot fly in the rain and there very stuborn to get flying once they are in the air when its not raining and when its not in maitence then yes there one of the best but eurofighter doesnt come with all them inconviences.
type 45 is not versatile in ship to ship capabillties but is soon to be fitted with some state of the art weapons.
TheGunner1324 2 months ago
serioulsy, america with all its being all mighty and shit yeah, well
that all means shit when the other country has a nuke to.
MrScotland262 3 months ago
if usa and the brits went to war not only will the EU join the brits so would the comenwealth countries like australia and new zealand india south africa and even canada would join the brits coz canada is part of the comen wealth treaty
robertleonardriley 3 months ago 44
@robertleonardriley if usa and uk went to war it would be as allies agaist the eu
and relying on french and italian armies to save your ass is a bit of a mistake anyway.
if anything the fench and germans would be happily watch the brits bleed as they hate the uk
janak19771977 3 months ago
@janak19771977
no they don't
-.-
MrScotland262 3 months ago
@janak19771977
No one likes america
MrScotland262 3 months ago 38
@MrScotland262 "No one likes america" thats not true the mexicans love it.....
DoctorEnzo 1 month ago
@DoctorEnzo. And english
gabriel25gatens 2 weeks ago
True!!
Divaelidia 1 week ago
@janak19771977 allied against UK yeh USA allways the good guys and are you stupid we have a millitary pact with france we like each other we didnt over 600 years ago you turd, and we have good diplomatic relations with with france, germany and the rest of the EU apart from a couple, and by the way france and italy have really good armys now and with the econemic power of the EU which is bigger than the US's we would win esspecially if we bring in the common wealth, epic fail uncle sam.
TheGunner1324 3 months ago
@janak19771977 and look it up for hundreds of years we have been out numbered by the enemies and yet we win. 3 examples: 1) rorkes drift (100 brits verses around 4000-5000, they had rifles from pevious battles) 2) battle of britain (they had more aircrafts and had the privilage of sleep) 3) Battle of Gravelines ( simple fishermen won the battle- english victory)
TheGunner1324 3 months ago
@TheGunner1324 calm down dude iam a huge grit fan hell iam colonial.
brit army is one of the best in the world i got tons of friends in it everybody knows that you can kick ass.
on the other hand eu sucks monkey balls and who ever trust the stinking french and shitty germans is for a big dissapointment
god save the queen
janak19771977 3 months ago
@robertleonardriley does that meen if there was a war britian would win?
Jordan123irving 3 months ago
@Jordan123irving no not really too be honnest im not sure who would win but the brits have a shit load more of exsperiance in wars and we all know history repeats itself wat my point is tht you dnt need a massive army to win wars a massive army does help dnt get me it does help look at englands war history they fucked everyone. they have battled armies 10 times thier size and won so wat im trying to say yes america might have numbers but englands got exsperiance as to who would win i donno
robertleonardriley 3 months ago
@robertleonardriley Yep. And if for any reason the USA president ordered the queen to be assassinated then this would by law happen. Either the president is hung or the commonwealth declares war on America, and we all know that europe would have to pick a side which would be britain. And im sure China would see their chance too, and help britain. So basically . . . Don't fuck with the Queen or you'll die!
GoDZELiiTE 2 months ago
@GoDZELiiTE lol not only china dude russia would join england russians hate the usa
robertleonardriley 2 months ago
@robertleonardriley so pretty much its the whole world against usa
robertleonardriley 2 months ago
@robertleonardriley I don't hate the USA, but thought id add to the comment. There are Americans that are ass holes, but there are a lot of nice Americans too, same everywhere in the world. Still glad I'm British though, lot of pride in the country, but not the British government lol
GoDZELiiTE 2 months ago
@robertleonardriley And any Brit has the most pride for the SAS and SBS, people can argue as much as they like that Seals or any other special forces are better but the fact is the SAS were the first modern day elite squad and trained other nations elite. Therefore in my eyes they are unmatched in skill. No question in that.
GoDZELiiTE 2 months ago
@GoDZELiiTE i agree i heard sas can stay in ur house for 3 months and u wouldnt even know they there but its just a rumur and for other coment dude i fell in love with an american girl im not american or british im south african and hold nothing against both countries im just writing my thoughts on this subject but yeah if u think the english goverment is bad look at south africas goverment they all came from robin island lol
robertleonardriley 2 months ago
@robertleonardriley Probably could do, but there better and getting in and out without people knowing there there, and wouldn't stick around lol By the sounds of it all governments are shit lol
GoDZELiiTE 2 months ago
@robertleonardriley Britain and the EU are not good friends as they once were, tbh I would much rather destroy the EU than America.
GamingLogics 2 months ago
@robertleonardriley plus british forces are the most highly trained in the world, if an even number of british and USA went to war we would blaitantly have the advantage :)
GRAFFlegend2011 2 months ago 3
@GRAFFlegend2011 "Blaitantly". So long as they don't put you in charge of signals...
blueray1969 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robertleonardriley How many of those countries join US and the UK in Iraq? People who just speak one language (English) are so complacent ignorant. They are happy by knowing so little about the rest of the world. Like Bush, he never had a passport before becoming president!! HAHAHAHA!
ClaudioEmarat 2 weeks ago
Just a small point. Served in Boomers and US does not have our codes.
SuperAncientmariner 3 months ago
what seriously you think the britts are that daft to give our nuke codes out even though we are against nukes even though if we do have them they will be well disarmed and yous couldnt even win the war yous started with japan Nagasaki and harushamer you couldn handle it when they bombed perall harbour in ask us for help so we did help and yous have a cheek to say yous won it lmao in wiki links dosent always tells you the truth so check your history and go back to skool as we no how to combat
wulwul22 3 months ago
Comment removed
wulwul22 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The British Navy = pirates in uniform.
Look out folks, here comes the return of the British E(va)mpire contemplating on re-conquering the world in the name of peace keeping. They done it before, no surprise that they won't do it again.
China, wake up!! The brits might bring these battle ships to your shores to start a Cocaine War, like the Opium War, and a list of unequal treaties favoring the brits.
taow222328 3 months ago
The missiles at 2:25 are blodhounds and have been out of service in the UK for many a year, I used to work on them.
IPersius 3 months ago
@IPersius Out of service in the UK for 20 years.
I think the last operational Bloodhound unit was in Switzerland and it stood down in 1999, although there is still one unit that the Swiss have preserved as a monument in a place called Gubel.
rufust1975 3 months ago
My Uncle is a Brigadier Colin Tadier CBE but you can toss your selves off to that Video and shit head NATO Terrorists like him! get a life!
gekiryudojo 3 months ago
3:07 - well at least their heads are camoflaged.
Twirlyhead 3 months ago
as soon as i saw the title i was just like, "yea we goddamn are, and trust me you'd all better be scared!"
pigpig252 3 months ago
why do people even talk about a us uk war??? it would never happen ever, becuase it is the british that founded the usa, in all respects, and almost all white americans are of european decent.... plus we are the worlds closest allies... however, we would kick the shit out of all others!! nice
MrHappyyappy 3 months ago
everyone end it. Britain are the best, BE THE BEST BITCHES
TweakedCinema 3 months ago
There'll be very little left when the tories have finished.
Alembic25 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IVE MADE A MUSIC VIDEO ABOUT ONE OF MY BEST FRIENDS WHO GOT KILLIED BY A TALIBAN SNIPER IN AFGHANISTAN THIS YEAR.
LEWIS WAS A BRITISH PARATROOPER
HE DIED 3 DAYS BEFORE HIS 21ST BIRTHDAY
TYPE IN UTUBE....'REMEDY MARCHING ON'
ALL SUPPORT APPRECIATED
R.I.P LEWIS HENDRY LOVE YOU MAN
'UTRINQUE PARATUS'
RemedialMusic 3 months ago
Yes the US spend more on military technology. But in terms of innovation, please don't compare. Everything the US does is upgrade already existsing conventional ideas.
PlaneAU 3 months ago
jesus, can you stop saying america saved blah blah blah's ass. If britain had lost the battle of britain, america would have been nuked the fuck out of. So they saved themselves and saved your own freedom at the same time.
PlaneAU 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf nah we would destroy american
rostofroflmao 4 months ago
@rostofroflmao LOL, not a chance.
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 4 months ago
To suggest the USA have control on UK nukes is beyond laughable also. As if the United Kingdom would leave there nuclear dependent on the USA lmao!
ConConzz 4 months ago
thats stupid britain is much smaller then usa its not logical two compare the two and we in uk use us armament and share tecnolagy
tyroneuva1 4 months ago
Britain is great we would've fought to the end in WWII but lets face it, in truth without (unfortunately) the Soviet Union us, America and the rest of the Allies would've been destroyed in France, Germany only commited 2 Armies to defending captured France, the majority of their forces were in the Soviet states. But we still held on against really bad odds before USA joined us and Dunkurk is a brilliant example of British spirit and self sacrifice
NinjazInside 4 months ago
the US would beat the crap out of you
DerBotoxPapst 4 months ago
@DerBotoxPapst i would like to see US try
weeguymo 4 months ago
@DerBotoxPapst with what? the harriers that the brits designed, the carriers that are from british designs, the army that is based on british army, the special forces that have been trained by british special forces, or the nukes that both the countries use? its alright saying the yanks wud...but they wouldnt be able to get here, america however has a nation 50 times as large as the uk but an armed forces 10 times as big....so u have more area to defend with less people....INIT
numba1danman 4 months ago
@numba1danman I'm Canadian, so I'm being impartial here. I like both America and Britain. But if those two countries went to war, I think it's clear that the USA would win. They just have too many advantages. They have a much larger and more advanced Army, Navy and Air Force. Plus a larger economy and industrial base. As someone else pointed out, the USA has the launch codes to Britain's nukes. Anyways, I think we should all be glad we're friends and focus on the real enemy... IRAN! :-P
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 4 months ago 3
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf usa doesnt whatsoever have the codes to our nukes, the uk however controls vital bases for americas nuclear systems, any powere with nuclear weapons can only be as strong as the other, a war which would never happen of course, and in fantasy terms a war without nukes ....they wud win,.....but they wud never overcome britain..u have 60 million people on this island well equppied, supplied and ready to fight....nearly 1,000 years since the last invasion...come and get it.
numba1danman 4 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Firslty although the USA army is much bigger, there is no technology gap between them and the UK. If the USA and UK went to war it would be the end of both countrys and quite possibly the world. Like you said let's be thankful we are partners forming the most powerful military force around.
ConConzz 4 months ago
@ConConzz Of course there is a technology gap. The United States spends more on military tech than any other nation on Earth. They are constantly developing and improving their weaponry and aircraft. Take the stealth helicopter that debuted at the Bin Laden raid for example. You can laugh all you want, the Americans do have your nuclear launch codes and the serial numbers to your missles. In fact, it wasn't very long ago that the USA shared this information with the Russians.
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 4 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf the us have the british launch codes lol? Im sure mi6 could tell when your president goes to take a shit if they wanted to. The CIA would fail to do anything like fail to know about 9/11 lmao. STFU with your crap.
PlaneAU 3 months ago
@PlaneAU Someone is being defensive. I guess the truth does hurt. What is your excuse for the MI6 "failing to do anything" about 7/7?
Also in Canada we have a prime minister, not a president.
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf we have a prime minister and use parliament to. It's because we invented it. And for us citizens over here, the 7/7 bombings don't really add up. And mi6/mi5 probably did know someting about them, just didn't act.
PlaneAU 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf You are mad mate, USA do not have control over UK Nuclear missiles otherwise the UK wouldn't run there own nuclear program via the Royal Navy submarine fleet. You do realise UK hold Nuclear technology by themselves? and was actually joint-operation with the americans during the cold war? There is obviously no way on earth any country would leave there nuclear bombs in the hands of a another nation (BTW the sharing infomation with Russia is comedy gold)
ConConzz 3 months ago
The point somebody made about the UK Controling vital american nuclear systems on some capacity actually has some truth in it as well, in a way,
ConConzz 3 months ago
@ConConzz Sent you the link to that story in a PM. "Comedy gold" indeed.
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf As i said, your link is useless and tells us nothing i already didn't know. US AND UK both know about each other nuclear infomation, doesn't mean we share the bloody launch codes.
ConConzz 3 months ago
Comment removed
TrentVenture 3 months ago
Comment removed
TrentVenture 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf The US DO NOT have the British launch codes.
Trident Coded Control Devices are fitted to all U.S. SSBNs.These devices prevented an attack until a launch code had been sent by the Chiefs of Staff on behalf of the President. The UK said they took the decision not to install Trident CCDs on the grounds that an aggressor might be able to wipe out chain of command.But the truth is they wanted to put their OWN system & code stucture inplace.
They do not share this with ANYONE.
TrentVenture 3 months ago
@TrentVenture Well said. The likely way a nuclear attack would be authoised would be the Polaris plan. Although that might be updated by now! Comedy deluded stuff from Jimmy burton though lmao!
ConConzz 3 months ago
@ConConzz Not surprising all of you commenting to me are British. I know it's a hard pill for you lot to swallow, but yes the Americans do have your nuclear launch codes, and yes their military technology is more advanced. Cheers.
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Why are you trying to get that idea in our heads, when you know full well it is not true? American do know senstive infomation about the UK Nuclear Arsenal, but it works vica versa. A huge amount of American Nuclear missles are held at a RAF base in England actually, not trident either.
ConConzz 3 months ago
@ConConzz What idea am I trying to instill into your head? Reality? The US knows almost every detail about the UK's nuclear arsenal and they've exchanged some of this other information with other countries.
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf They exchanged some details regarding Missles they supply the UK for Nuclear bombs to russia, that is it.
Stop making stuff up, and get the idea out of your head that USA have the UK Launch codes, IT WOULD BE NO USE TO THE USA WHATS SO EVER. American have the ability to launch a bomb anywhere in the world on there selfs, without our trident nuclear programme!
ConConzz 3 months ago
@ConConzz Sure, whatever you say. It's so much easier to brush it off as non-sense than do a little of your own research.
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf You say the US knows almost every detail re. the UK`s nuclear arsenal and they`ve exchanged some of this ( other info ) with other countries. Who told you this ?
valarmanwe 3 months ago
@valarmanwe Hey. Yes, the United States shared details of Britain's nuclear program with Russia as part of the New START treaty. This was revealed by WIkiLeaks back in February.
jimmyburtonmapleleaf 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Not more advanced, but they are better supplied with fuel and have more men to throw at us.
Having a battle between the US and GB would end with MASSIVE loss of life on both sides, yes, I concede a war with the US has a slim chance of going well for us, luckily we are allies, and people should stop bringing this topic up.
Warmongering non-military teenagers should STFU.
sargentaaron2004 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Im british and agree the yanks would win. Purely because of their numbers, its fact that the british armed forces are the best trained in the world. After all we do train many of the worlds military including some aspects of the americans. The US do not have the UK,s nuke codes, dont be so naive. Just before world war two the US was preparing a war against the brits and canada. secert file "Joint Plan Red," the results showed that there would more likely be a deadlock.
tiff0098 3 months ago
@tiff0098 wat were u get this info
robertleonardriley 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf I only disagree with some things, they arent more advanced, and if they had the launch code to our nuclear missile, then they could launch at someone to start a world war, NO country has our launch codes, you are misguided to think that.
Outypoo 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Actually that's not true. Many people overlook this fact, but Great Britain has the Commonwealth, a collection of 54 countries all around the world. With each country having its own army and all swearing loyalty to the Queen, we have the US out gunned, not to mention surrounded. Although I do wish the America Military would get out of the UK. They have bases all around our country, maybe more than we do, not to mention the CIA facilities.
Eleglas 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf are you stupid?Launch codes for UK missiles?haha did you even know that your special forces as many other in the world are based of the SAS?Counter-terrorism is written by the brits?you can only wish for the bullshit you have writen..
mrivesn 3 months ago
@mrivesn idiot...
anniedear2k11 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf not to say that your stupid troops kill more friendlies than enemy your braindead thugs..
mrivesn 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Nobody who knows how Britains nukes actually work would tell you how ignorant you are. The UK does not operate like the yanks. US would win from numbers, but individually they are significantly faster in the mouth and slower in all other ways.
cageordie 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf The british armed forces is as advanced as the usa,s in many fields and is powerfull,the usa,s armed forces it a lot bigger and more powerfull ofc.
rolflmaoweeee 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf The european Union has our Launch codes however we can launch them if we deem it necessary but if the UK and the USA went to war all of European Would join in due the EU and The EU Combined has a larger Army, Larger Economy, A MUCH Larger Industrial base however this is all Pointless because we Brits and you Yankies will Never go to war with each other
maizematt 3 months ago
Iran?
HolyShadow180 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Has our codes? who told you that, the Prime Minister haha you think Civilians are going to know hows got Nuke codes???
HolyShadow180 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf Take a look at history, Britain has a talent for pulling a victory out of its backside.
TheLahness 3 months ago
@jimmyburtonmapleleaf no, are you stupid launch codes to britains nukes jesus talk about armerican propganda, we can only rely on the US to launch the missles weapons, why would they have our codes, jesus and even then only around half of our nukes would rely on the US that means we still got around 100 nuclear weapons that britain can operate indepedently without the US assistance, i heard some thing in the past but thats gotta be the funniest.
TheGunner1324 3 months ago
@DerBotoxPapst hhaha I don't think so, we have nuclear submarines in the Atlantic, America would dare try anything because they are afraid we will nuke the shit out of you.
GamingLogics 4 months ago
@GamingLogics
I don't want to disappoint you, but the Yanks have the launch codes for our nukes...
DipDop99 4 months ago
@DipDop99 I don't want to disappoint you but they don't you fucking idiot.
GamingLogics 4 months ago
@GamingLogics
Ummm, they really do.
DipDop99 4 months ago
we might have a small army but we are we tough
hit888 4 months ago
WATCH OUT AMERICA, WERE COMING TO GET OUR LAND BACK!!!
TheWorldStrider 4 months ago
@TheWorldStrider Um... No we arn't.. we would die x10
IamRyanLPs 4 months ago
We must agree to differ on this I think. Good job it's only hypothetical.
I have to go, talk again later.
SuperAncientmariner 4 months ago
@SuperAncientmariner Then we agree to disagree, I guess. There is no way of proving these hypothetical scenarios. It's all speculation.
Bye.
bittersweetcum 4 months ago
*decimate the German Navy
bittersweetcum 4 months ago
@bittersweetcum ...have gone ahead. ( You were not in the war when it actually did happen and I do not think it would have happened had you been. When it did go ahead Hitler only had Britain to think of). So, our thesis must ask would Russia and Germany actually be fighting . That would, IMO, depend on the noises from Roosevelt on Britains defeat.
SuperAncientmariner 4 months ago
@bittersweetcum The simple fact I am trying to make is that, irrespective of America's capabilities, had Britain not held out against Germany in 1940, WW2 would have been very different if ,indeed , it became a world war.
SuperAncientmariner 4 months ago
@SuperAncientmariner The end results would still be the same. Britain's role was supporting, not decisive.
bittersweetcum 4 months ago
@bittersweetcum (wrong button ) As I was saying. ...Given that fact, Britain did play it's part and it was a descisive part. Holding out in 1940 was the foundation of all that followed (in Europe anyway)