This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ROMANIAN HUMAN TRAFFICKING INTO IRELAND
3 men will be sentenced in Romania for trafficking Romanians into Ireland for labour exploitation.
Remus Fusteac 41, his son Arthur Sergiu 21, and his nephew, Alexandru 20, were charged with human trafficking, running organised crime syndicate, money laundering and possession of firearms.
They were arrested and charged after a joint investigation by the Gardaí and the police in Romania.
Irish People Unite! Once again you are called upon to defend yourself from an invading army. But this Army is camouflaged. Vote Against the Lisbon Treaty. Protect your rights!
Samndrea you're so right. The EU army have reached my house and they're telling my I have to have an abortion. I tried to explain that I'm not pregnant and am a guy but they won't listen. What am I to do????? Oh no! Now they're privatising the health service!!! SOMEBODY PLEASE HELP!!!! If only we had listened to you and voted No.
NO vote = we are still in the EU, like we are now, and the EU must be more accountable to the people of Europe. It stops the runaway power of the EU parliament and its gravy train expenses.
YES vote = no way back, we can't undo mistakes made in the treaty or the EU, our say in EU is halved. Some countries say is doubled.
The mature thing is to stand up and tell EU to correct the problems, not to give in to the accusing tut-tutting of EU politicians trying to tell us we should be embarrassed.
*YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, IDA, ISME, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Small Firms Association, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
*YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, IDA, ISME, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Small Firms Association, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
urfadder, remember to celebrate this day when ur filing euro fed and irish taxes each year. make sure u are on time. 2 for the price of one with this deal. ur going to love it. these fat cat politicians are all for it. yeah they are going to be taxing ur little ass out of existence. enjoy and celebrate!
its not a question of trusting...those people you trust have put ireland into a recession!or have you forgotten..all the promises these people give are for their own benefit..non of them legally binding and theres not a dam bit of differnece anyone can do to stop it if it is ratified. no provision of constitution can over rule the treaty that is what the treaty says is that what u want?
*YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, IDA, ISME, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Small Firms Association, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
i read the sovereign indenpendant---EU flags popping up like swastikas? hell yeah theres one put up outside my school!!
that retard urfadder is leaving that comment on all these lisbon videos-why the fuck would I be conviced about the lisbon treaty just becaues the government tell us its good?
The majority of people have not read this treaty so why vote yes?you wouldnt sign a life changeing contract you didnt read its the same thing only a total fucking idiot would vote yes
i have to go now,its a 4 hour drive back home to vote.......fingers crossed for a no,if you actually study this lisbon treaty you will actually see how many countries have to be in it, in order for it to work,and well just look at the Treatys,its all about control,and who is in and who is not,it kinda reminds me of a playground.......the way kids push each other around,a bunch of kids in the EU pushing a fat kid in the Dail around,why do they pick on the fat kids?
NO SIDE: Shinners, Ganley, Socialists, Coir, Eirigi, UKIP, Le Pen, BNP.
YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
NO SIDE: Shinners, Ganley, Socialists, Coir, Eirigi, UKIP, Le Pen, BNP.
YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
Yeah good luck in reading the treaty! It's unreadable!
However, if you go on Jens-Peter Bonde's website (a Danish MEP) he has attempted to make a consolidated text in pdf format that is free for anyone to read.
1.Big business looking for cheap labour like Dell who left Ireland for Poland and Nokia who left Germany for Rumania.
2.The "elite" and overpaid politicians and burocrats in Brussels,most members of the EU Playmobil "parliament" in Strasbourg & Brussels.
NO side : France,The Netherlands,Ireland who have already voted NO + Austria,Germany and UK whom would all vote NO if "allowed" by the un-elected commission of millionares.
Do the maths and vote YES to democracy,NO to Lisbon 2.
In which case my friend I would have been glad to expound my "theories" to which you so elouently alluded. See there I would be able to talk to you one on one and this would not be some sophistry where i felt that either of our intentions were sullied in trying to influence ppl. Peace eh?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm not really a fan of private messaging. I don't really see the point of it in this particular format (good for dating sites though, I'm sure)
And, seriously, all I'm asking you about is your point of view. I don't see why it's necessary for us to hide under the proverbial covers so you to whisper your thoughts on the subject to me.
And I hardly think my asking you about your ideas here is really clogging anything.
Yesforworkers, have you only just joined youtube now? for what purpose? The handle for god sake. Get out you trolls. Im an ordinary guy who has no agenda and i'm votin no. And there are many reasons. Who is anyone else to tell a person what their reasons should or should'nt be. The Treaty itself is Linguistic Deconstruction pure and simple.
You've got google, you've got Chomsky(Linguistics professor, M.I.T).
Go figure. If your really serious I can hold your hand but i'd prefer you did your own research as I'm not trying to influence you.
Neither am I interested in getting into a lengthy debate on an opinion I am quite entitled to with someone who does'nt know what I am referring to. When you know what it is maybe we could dialogue further if you want to refute the varacity of my Opinion.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Jesus... calm down!
Linguistics is a fascinating area but I'm afraid I don't really know that much about it. I thought your mention of it in the context of the Lisbon treaty sounded interesting.
If you freak out like this every time somebody shows an interest in your theories, why do you bother posting your thoughts at all?
Perfectly calm friend. I'm just not getting involved in argueing, im just a randomer pointing out random things. Did you check out what i was talking about?? Personally i'm delighted if it was interest you were showing in (not my theories, i could'nt take credit for that) what i said. But if I were you and i was that interested i'd have googled the term. It would have been quicker and not clogged up all this debating space for other people. You could have also private msg'd me. :) Toodles!
On September 3rd 2008, in a ruling striking down an EU Regulation freezing terrorist assets (following UNSC Resolution 1267 demanding a freeze), the ECJ said "an international agreement cannot affect the allocation of powers fixed by the Treaties or, consequently, the autonomy of the Community legal system.". So there you have it: the ECJ's declaration of EU independence from international law. The govt call the guarantees an international-agreement.
"yesforworkers", your post is rich in irony given you support a Treaty that will give Britain a 12% say in my country's laws, compared to a 0.8% say for Irish politicians, You are hunting with the fox and running with the hounds.
The UN-ELECTED EU commission are adamant that Turkey joins the EU. Think about the implications !
Under Lisbon,voting rights depend on a country's population. Would you be happy with TURKEY having 20 TIMES THE VOTING RIGHTS OF IRELAND ?
Most Europeans also want to keep their own constitutions and parliamentary democracies,health systems,legal systems,school systems,own police and military !
Ireland PLEASE say NO again to the 2nd Lisbon PUTSCH attempt ! For yourselves,your children and ours.
Nice one WACI. "Yesforworkers", explain to me why Spanish unemployment doubled to 18% after they voted no, and why we should believe Dick Roche who said 'there is no reason to believe that large numbers will come' during Nice II. Nice II and the ECB's one-size-fits-all interest rates, together with a FF govt in league with the builders, are responsible for this mess. Trying to blame the Irish people for it is nothing short of a scandal.
Most of my comments weren't addressed to you. I also doubt that you resent Nick Griffin, in fact you're probably delighted he's involved so you can smear the no side the vast majority of whom are not interested in his policies.
As for Eamonn Dunphy he's a sports pundit.
The guarantees don't change one dot or comma in the treaty.
I have no idea what faux-outrage is, and I have no interest in responding to all of your comments because you post about a dozen to every one that I put up. But I will respond to the last few-
the treaty is fundamentally different because 46% of people who voted no last time did so on the basis of concerns that have been addressed in the guarantees. You might have noticed that over the weekend arch-sceptic Eamonn Dunphy came out and said he was changing his mind from No to Yes this time.
The ECJ cannot touch Irish tax, that's in international and European law now, so that will never happen.
There were several reasons why multinatioanals came to Ireland- low tax rate, good infrastructure, stable political environment, educated workforce, EU membership.
If we delete any one of these reasons, such as Eu membership (or sitting on the sidelines of Europe, which is what we'll be doing), they will leave.
This evening in Berlin,people from all over Germany will be demonstrating against this disgusting treaty. We will be making our voices heard and showing that we support the still free people of Ireland !
The Lisbon treaty is self-amending so it could be Ireland's last vote and Germany's last demonstration. Don't let this happen,vote NO for all our children's sake !
Check out No 2 Lisbon 2 and the EU's own paramilitary : European Gendarmerie Force
Plain and simple arguments, the truth in a nutshell, great. Support for Merkel has significantly dropped in germany. So one of the big supporters of lisbon in the EU might fall. Most germans as well as most europeans would vote against lisbon. Do it for us, irish people. NO to lisbon means NO to lisbon. May God bless you..
Irish history has shown that in the face of outside non-Irish oppression that has been pressed upon the people of Ireland that only the Irish from Ulster have had the balls and fortitude to stand up to these foreign filth that would impose their will upon the people of Ireland.
Anyone care to take me up on the argument or are your heads too heavy with the guilt of betrayal?
Little wonder - we travelled South to fight for you and you won't even fight for yourselves.
By the way, has anyone noticed the comments lower down by 'Ukipwebmaster'????
the one thing I agree with all of you guys on, whatever about Lisbon is a love for the country. how can you call yourselves nationalists if you're doing the dirty work of the United Kingdom Independence party??!! They want a return to the old imperialist britain.
If u want proof, just check out their website- there's a nice picture of britain in the top right hand corner, complete with the entire Island of Ireland!
WACI - the irony is that if the 26 counties had kept their fiscal snozzel out of the arse-bangers trough of the EU and retained the Punt then the commie (self-aggrandising and pocket-lining) cunts in Dáil Éireann would have been better armed against the 'recession' whereby those traitorous scum together with Banc Ceannais na hÉireann could have devalued the currency.
It fucking pisses me off that the majority of people (North & South) haven't a baldy fuckin' clue about basic economics and they entrust their all in the hands of a few arrogant, fat-arsed, traitorous sons of whores who would sell you a goat and swear it was a pig.
Give that verbose prick Kenny a chance with the proviso that a referendum be put to the people (as enshrined in Bunreacht na hÉireann) to ABOLISH PR elections,
You mean our "votes" are respected by UKIP surely? Can't say the same for our own politicians though who have contrived against the voters before the results were even in. Nor Barrosso or Sarkozy who called us "bloody fools". Are you proud of that?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
FF ran an appalling Yes campaign... no, I am not proud of the "bloody fools" tag (when was that actually said by the way?) but it was not a million miles away from the truth
The debate (Lisbon 1) was dominated by issues that are not even effected by the treaty (taxation, abortion, neutrality etc) and the coalition were too inept to refocus discussion.
Unfortunately it seems to be happening again... the COIR poster campaign is absurd.
We need a proper debate centred on the real issues.
well, a lot of people in Ireland have become greedy. It's one thing I noticed when I came back. That's why Coir are targeting the lowering of the minimum wage etc.
The strategy for the yes side last time was to ignore the contents of the treaty, demonize the no side and speak in generalities about the EU. The same thing is happening this time again only now they've introduced all these 'personality' groups to try and sell the treaty for them. FF/FG/Lab/GP they're all the same.
The Coír posters have provoked real debate about the EU. Whereas the yes sides posters are full of lies about jobs, the economy and being kicked out of the EU.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Is it fair and truthful to put up posters proclaiming "Minimum wage under Lisbon €1.82?"
It's a nonsensical statement with no basis in fact. Even putting the question mark after it further reduces its value. One get's the impression that inserting the question mark was more of a legal decision!
No, it's probably not going to happen unless the ECJ decide that minimum wages distort free movement. However there's a lot of media debate recently about our min wage being too high, so it looks like it's going to be reduced.
The yes side lies about jobs/the economy and being kicked out of the EU are not being exposed by the msm, all the attacks are against the no side, same as last year.
Now we have the EU using propaganda ads in cinemas and going into schools to campaign about the 'benefits' of the EU. It's starting to reveal itself as the sinister organization it is, that doesn't take no or allow dissent. I hope this treaty is defeated before we are trapped in this nightmare federation.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The ECJ has no jurisdiction over the setting of minimum wage levels in member states.
And where did the figure of €1.82 come from?
The only organisation that will have decision making power when it comes to reducing our minimum wage will be the same political party that the citizens of this country insist on re-electing over and over again.
Rubbish, there was no provisions in the treaties to allow our fishing waters be taken over but the EU (EEC) done it anyway. They done the same with our social welfare and immigration policies through the free movement of people directive. The laval judgement has undermined union wages. Can you predict what judgements they are going to make in the future?
btw you haven't said anything about the lies on the yes posters so I assume you are happy with those lies.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You say "rubbish" to the ECJ having no jurisdiction of the setting of minimum wages in member states... So it is your understanding that the ECJ does have jurisdiction?
Perhaps you might point me towards some indication that this might be the case. If this is actually the case, I think you might have stumbled on a major constitutional crisis in the wings.
I am not "happy" with lies but as yet I am am not seeing any from the Yes campaign as blatant as the €1.82 fantasy.
I've already addressed this issue, the EU/ECJ have a long history of claiming competence they are not supposed to have. I've given you 3 examples of this and can give more if you want.
You are using the typical yes side tactic of demanding specific Articles in the treaty while ignoring the history of competence creep and ECJ judgements.
Now are you going to show how we can be kicked out of the EU? or how the treaty will give us jobs and save the economy?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No, I'm afraid you have not... there are many groundless accusations in your posts that unfortunately have little credibility.
Exactly how has the "EU/ECJ" adversely effected Ireland's social welfare policies through free movement? (Free movement being part of the Maastricht which was ratified by us over 15 years ago)
Also keen to see where the Yes campaign is threatening that we will be "kicked out" if we fail to ratify...
The government introduced legislation at the time of the Nice Treaty to stop social welfare tourism and stop anyone entering the country from receiving SW for 2 years. This was overturned by the free movement of people directive in 2004. So you haven't a clue what you're talking about.
One of the main subtexts of the yes side is that we are voting to remain in the EU, hence the deceptive posters about needing to be in the EU.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"You haven't a clue what your talking about"... nice, cheers for that...
You seem to be referring to the habitual residency in Irish social welfare law.
Perhaps you could direct me to a resource that gives an account of how a change to Irish social welfare legislation was attempted and subsequently scuppered by, as you say, "free movement of people directive in 2004"
Am also still keen to see evidence for the "€1.82 minimum wage" claim...
I've already given you an account of how our social welfare legislation was usurped. Go look up the Directive 38/EC/2004, I'm not going to do your work for you.
I've already addressed the minimum wage issue and ECJ judgements so I don't know why you keep repeating that I should provide evidence that it cannot come about. Why don't you look into your crystal ball and tell me why it can't? Are you now predicting all future ECJ judgements and on what basis?
"If a person has been resident for less than two years they will be presumed not to be habitually resident and it is up to them to prove otherwise, however even if they have been in the country for two years they may not necessarily meet all the requirements of habitual residency"
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yes, that is the legislation
You said that the Irish goverenment attempted to introduce social welfare legislation (you were not specific) but were either stopped from doing so or that legislation was overturned in line with Free Movement
I have been unable to find anything online or from any other source substantiating this claim
I have not been able to do so, Nor have you been able to direct me to any online resource to back this up.
The quote I posted was from the NCCRI, I can't post a link as Youtube doesn't allow it. I've already said that the Directive undermined this legislation, this was included in Article 24, among others, of the Directive.
They do, as does UKIP, but they are smeared as racists in England by Labor so anti-lisbon parties like Sinn Fein and reform EU parties like Libertas can't ally with them.
I don't know or care who Nick Griffin is but I do know who destroyed this country, the exact same people who are telling us we need to vote yes.
Btw you should look at some of the vested interests and shady contacts of Pat Cox and Peter Sutherland, two of the main yesmen supposedly looking out for the interests of this country.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm also not clear about your interpretation of the word "subtext".
The theme is Ireland as part of a two tiered EU (divided into those nation states that did not wish to ratify this treaty and those that did, Ireland being part of the former group)
The "subtext" (as you put it) of being "kicked out" is neither implicit nor explicit in any of the Yes campaign arguments because it is simply not on the table.
The subtext is implicit that we're either in or out if you won't acknowledge that then you are being deceptive. You also talk about a two tier Europe, please explain how that can come about?
Also explain how Lisbon will provide jobs and economic security? and what is meant by 'safety' in the yes posters?
I've answered every question you've asked but you like to be in the driving seat by asking the questions and ignoring the answers I've given you repeatedly. Now you're playing the 'polite' game. I've answered your questions are you going to do likewise?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm sorry that you believe that my wanting to inform myself about the Lisbon Treaty is my "being in the driver's seat".
And being polite to people is not a "game"
And as you have made it clear that you do not know who Nick Griffen is, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that you may not be the expert on European politics that I initially thought
You're not interested in informing yourself, you're here to smear the no side hence your reference to Nick Griffin and UKIP.
Your being polite is a game in that you are using faux outrage at my tame comments.
I see you haven't answered any of my questions re yes posters lies, agh well didn't expect you would. Better to keep the no side on the backfoot and ignore the yes lies.
I've given you a quote and the source of the article and told you Yt doesn't allow links, this is the heading:
"Proposed Changes in the Social Welfare Code Arising from EU Enlargement"
I've also given you an Article from the Directive which undermined this legislation.
It's clear you aren't going to address the yes side lies and are just repeating yourself at this stage. There's no point debating any further if this is your position.
I did not change my position and why are you putting sentences in quotes which I never said? The 2 year habitual residence no longer applies to the SW payments I referred to in the article. You can look up the Welfare site to confirm this.
You talked about a two tier Europe, how would that come about? Do you consider that to be a lie? Or yes for jobs, is that a lie?
Every politician in Ireland respected the last No vote. And if we say No again they'll respect that too. UKIP only respect anything that goes along with their way of thinking, they don't give two hoots about what you want. Have a look at their website- a nice little picture of Ireland in their map of Britain in the corner.
We are asked to vote "no" again becasue the boys who support the yes vote have not learned the Meaning of "no" from their partners,Sarcozy:Madame can we do it again.....Lady:NO im tired!!!,Sarcozy:why not,i pay you alot of money,i look after you,Lady:i know you do,but your very small........,put it away its embarassing,Sarcozy:you Bitch,ill wait till you are asleep and then ill pounce like french snail...........
Lisbon has nothing to do with our sovereignty people. There is a special article inserted which allows us to leave whenever we want. i voting yes because it's good for workers and because we can leave whenever we want.
We can leave the EU tomorrow if we want as there's nothing stopping us. Under Lisbon we would have to give two years notice and negotiate withdrawl while being powerless for those two years. In the former USSR any country could also withdraw but it never happened because they always had the party leaders in positions of power.
Ireland recieves more foreign direct investment from the US than China, Brazil and Russia combined. If we left Europe we would lose all our foreign direct investment. It would be mad to leave Europe tomorrow if we have any interest in keeping our jobs.
Your a yesman troll, voting yes has nothing to do with jobs and you're playing on people's fears. Take your trolling somewhere else or provide evidence that voting yes will somehow secure jobs.
Btw Spain ratified the treaty and they now have 18% unemployment. So take you fearmongering somewhere else, the people are starting to see through the lies.
If The government had their way we'd probably be all speaking french or german to make those smarmy european bastards seem more at home. it seems nazis are not dead after all with europe calling the shots. steps have to be taken to make sure the e.u. won't get their way anymore, or else our children will end up marrying foreigners, its bad enough that all those stinking polish are around the place without the french coming here too, the place will stink.
i got a 10 page booklet from the referendum commission , 5 pages as gailege 5 in english ! explaining the lisbon treaty ! has anybody seen the lisbon treaty ? its like 4 phone books thick !
if lisbon passes , fianna fail are free to lumber ireland with 90 billion euros of Nama debt ,
When lisbon came areound the first time I was actively against it, I rang Pat McKenna and asked her did she see Bilderberg written all over it, she replied, "yes without a doubt"
wow..... that is a baaaaaaad podcast..... they really do make irish citizens look like idiots
bbphnix 10 months ago
VOTE NO!!!!!!! FUCK FEMA NWO AN THR ILLUMINATI
MRshoz1 1 year ago
I 'm wondering why Ireland is now begging for EU's financial Aid?
andresobotta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks to the EU-
Our Irish National day has become a National Farce!
watch?v=T8KIwIcAQok
ireland2day 1 year ago
Hang the treasonous bitch!
GordonsAllSeeingEye 2 years ago
Long live Europe!!!
Kernelpanic76 2 years ago
Samndrea should really take a valium. See her comment below....
padraigomairtin 2 years ago
2-1 in favour of Lisbon. That's the reality of the situation. And that represents a total of 1,200,000 voters.
1957Rotu 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ROMANIAN HUMAN TRAFFICKING INTO IRELAND
3 men will be sentenced in Romania for trafficking Romanians into Ireland for labour exploitation.
Remus Fusteac 41, his son Arthur Sergiu 21, and his nephew, Alexandru 20, were charged with human trafficking, running organised crime syndicate, money laundering and possession of firearms.
They were arrested and charged after a joint investigation by the Gardaí and the police in Romania.
They face up to 15 years in prison.
RTÉ.ie 2/10/09
waaeaa 2 years ago
67% yes you cunts, stick that in you pipes you stupid cunts
MARK00006805 2 years ago
I know, imagine 32.9% got it wrong?
BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS.
urfadder 2 years ago
Good arguement! Did you see all the people that bought Britney Spear's first album? They did that without any economic fear!
Oh yes, there's no shortage of stupid people in the world who will do what they are told!
MCSmudgeEIRE 2 years ago 2
Irish People Unite! Once again you are called upon to defend yourself from an invading army. But this Army is camouflaged. Vote Against the Lisbon Treaty. Protect your rights!
samndrea 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Cheers, we'll keep an eye out for the silent black helicoptors too.
Lunatic...
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
shut up
limerickgreen 2 years ago
Samndrea you're so right. The EU army have reached my house and they're telling my I have to have an abortion. I tried to explain that I'm not pregnant and am a guy but they won't listen. What am I to do????? Oh no! Now they're privatising the health service!!! SOMEBODY PLEASE HELP!!!! If only we had listened to you and voted No.
padraigomairtin 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NO vote = we are still in the EU, like we are now, and the EU must be more accountable to the people of Europe. It stops the runaway power of the EU parliament and its gravy train expenses.
YES vote = no way back, we can't undo mistakes made in the treaty or the EU, our say in EU is halved. Some countries say is doubled.
The mature thing is to stand up and tell EU to correct the problems, not to give in to the accusing tut-tutting of EU politicians trying to tell us we should be embarrassed.
EuropesHope 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*NO SIDE: Shinners, Ganley, Socialists, Coir, Eirigi, UKIP, Le Pen, BNP.
*YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, IDA, ISME, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Small Firms Association, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
Who you going to trust?
urfadder 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*NO SIDE: Shinners, Ganley, Socialists, Coir, Eirigi, UKIP, Le Pen, BNP.
*YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, IDA, ISME, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Small Firms Association, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
Who you going to trust?
urfadder 2 years ago
urfadder, remember to celebrate this day when ur filing euro fed and irish taxes each year. make sure u are on time. 2 for the price of one with this deal. ur going to love it. these fat cat politicians are all for it. yeah they are going to be taxing ur little ass out of existence. enjoy and celebrate!
frankwillissa 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
VOTE NO - VOTE NO - VOTE NO - VOTE NO
UlidianPechts 2 years ago
URFADDER question have u read the treaty?
its not a question of trusting...those people you trust have put ireland into a recession!or have you forgotten..all the promises these people give are for their own benefit..non of them legally binding and theres not a dam bit of differnece anyone can do to stop it if it is ratified. no provision of constitution can over rule the treaty that is what the treaty says is that what u want?
soneill543 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*NO SIDE: Shinners, Ganley, Socialists, Coir, Eirigi, UKIP, Le Pen, BNP.
*YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, IDA, ISME, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Small Firms Association, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
Who you going to trust?
urfadder 2 years ago
i read the sovereign indenpendant---EU flags popping up like swastikas? hell yeah theres one put up outside my school!!
that retard urfadder is leaving that comment on all these lisbon videos-why the fuck would I be conviced about the lisbon treaty just becaues the government tell us its good?
TheCommieslayer 2 years ago 2
The majority of people have not read this treaty so why vote yes?you wouldnt sign a life changeing contract you didnt read its the same thing only a total fucking idiot would vote yes
1mrwolf1 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Then they need need to educate themselves about it rather than sitting back whining about not understanding it
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
i have to go now,its a 4 hour drive back home to vote.......fingers crossed for a no,if you actually study this lisbon treaty you will actually see how many countries have to be in it, in order for it to work,and well just look at the Treatys,its all about control,and who is in and who is not,it kinda reminds me of a playground.......the way kids push each other around,a bunch of kids in the EU pushing a fat kid in the Dail around,why do they pick on the fat kids?
Elevationary 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Cheers, I've studied it
If you are actually serious with your "fat kid" analogy, I can only guess that you have not
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NO SIDE: Shinners, Ganley, Socialists, Coir, Eirigi, UKIP, Le Pen, BNP.
YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
Who you going to trust?
urfadder 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NO SIDE: Shinners, Ganley, Socialists, Coir, Eirigi, UKIP, Le Pen, BNP.
YES SIDE: all international chambers of commerce, most independent economists, 3 main political parties, IFA, IBEC, SIPTU, ICTU, most major trade unions, Pfizer, Ryanair, Intel, Microsoft.
Who you going to trust?
urfadder 2 years ago
People who've GENUINLY read the treaty.
corruptiblelogistics 2 years ago
Yeah good luck in reading the treaty! It's unreadable!
However, if you go on Jens-Peter Bonde's website (a Danish MEP) he has attempted to make a consolidated text in pdf format that is free for anyone to read.
00000Dean00000 2 years ago
Anyone who thinks democracy is a good thing will be voting No.
youknowimright1 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
YES side :
1.Big business looking for cheap labour like Dell who left Ireland for Poland and Nokia who left Germany for Rumania.
2.The "elite" and overpaid politicians and burocrats in Brussels,most members of the EU Playmobil "parliament" in Strasbourg & Brussels.
NO side : France,The Netherlands,Ireland who have already voted NO + Austria,Germany and UK whom would all vote NO if "allowed" by the un-elected commission of millionares.
Do the maths and vote YES to democracy,NO to Lisbon 2.
Spenner56 2 years ago
Wow, nice use of powerpoint.
You definitely changed my mind.
Nutters.
urfadder 2 years ago
nobody gives a crap what u think. nimrod!
frankwillissa 2 years ago
In which case my friend I would have been glad to expound my "theories" to which you so elouently alluded. See there I would be able to talk to you one on one and this would not be some sophistry where i felt that either of our intentions were sullied in trying to influence ppl. Peace eh?
ArmoricanBoy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm not really a fan of private messaging. I don't really see the point of it in this particular format (good for dating sites though, I'm sure)
And, seriously, all I'm asking you about is your point of view. I don't see why it's necessary for us to hide under the proverbial covers so you to whisper your thoughts on the subject to me.
And I hardly think my asking you about your ideas here is really clogging anything.
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
Don't worry mate, i'm not trying to solicit you. Believe. Anyway as i asked, have you checked out what i was talking about?
ArmoricanBoy 2 years ago
Veracity lol
ArmoricanBoy 2 years ago
Do you still think the EU is something you'd like to cuddle up to ?
Google these sites :
Project Indect (EU funded project to monitor You-tube,Facebook,blogs,PC's etc.for "abnormal behaviour")
EGF (EUs Para-military)
Sitcen (EUs secret service)
Europol (EU cops granted immunity)
European Arrest Warrant (now being abused for non-serious crime.See : Fair Trials international).
No decent,freedom loving European wants this kind of EU !
Say NO 2 Big Brother and Lisbon !
Spenner56 2 years ago
Yesforworkers, have you only just joined youtube now? for what purpose? The handle for god sake. Get out you trolls. Im an ordinary guy who has no agenda and i'm votin no. And there are many reasons. Who is anyone else to tell a person what their reasons should or should'nt be. The Treaty itself is Linguistic Deconstruction pure and simple.
ArmoricanBoy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Interesting.
What is Linguistic Deconstruction and how does this apply to the treaty?
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
You've got google, you've got Chomsky(Linguistics professor, M.I.T).
Go figure. If your really serious I can hold your hand but i'd prefer you did your own research as I'm not trying to influence you.
Neither am I interested in getting into a lengthy debate on an opinion I am quite entitled to with someone who does'nt know what I am referring to. When you know what it is maybe we could dialogue further if you want to refute the varacity of my Opinion.
ArmoricanBoy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Jesus... calm down!
Linguistics is a fascinating area but I'm afraid I don't really know that much about it. I thought your mention of it in the context of the Lisbon treaty sounded interesting.
If you freak out like this every time somebody shows an interest in your theories, why do you bother posting your thoughts at all?
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
Perfectly calm friend. I'm just not getting involved in argueing, im just a randomer pointing out random things. Did you check out what i was talking about?? Personally i'm delighted if it was interest you were showing in (not my theories, i could'nt take credit for that) what i said. But if I were you and i was that interested i'd have googled the term. It would have been quicker and not clogged up all this debating space for other people. You could have also private msg'd me. :) Toodles!
ArmoricanBoy 2 years ago
On September 3rd 2008, in a ruling striking down an EU Regulation freezing terrorist assets (following UNSC Resolution 1267 demanding a freeze), the ECJ said "an international agreement cannot affect the allocation of powers fixed by the Treaties or, consequently, the autonomy of the Community legal system.". So there you have it: the ECJ's declaration of EU independence from international law. The govt call the guarantees an international-agreement.
mango2005 2 years ago
NO TO LIES - NO TO LISBON
Don't trust the our self-serving Elite who want to sell the country for a few Euros!
TheEuropeanAgenda 2 years ago 2
"yesforworkers", your post is rich in irony given you support a Treaty that will give Britain a 12% say in my country's laws, compared to a 0.8% say for Irish politicians, You are hunting with the fox and running with the hounds.
mango2005 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The UN-ELECTED EU commission are adamant that Turkey joins the EU. Think about the implications !
Under Lisbon,voting rights depend on a country's population. Would you be happy with TURKEY having 20 TIMES THE VOTING RIGHTS OF IRELAND ?
Most Europeans also want to keep their own constitutions and parliamentary democracies,health systems,legal systems,school systems,own police and military !
Ireland PLEASE say NO again to the 2nd Lisbon PUTSCH attempt ! For yourselves,your children and ours.
Spenner56 2 years ago
Nice one WACI. "Yesforworkers", explain to me why Spanish unemployment doubled to 18% after they voted no, and why we should believe Dick Roche who said 'there is no reason to believe that large numbers will come' during Nice II. Nice II and the ECB's one-size-fits-all interest rates, together with a FF govt in league with the builders, are responsible for this mess. Trying to blame the Irish people for it is nothing short of a scandal.
mango2005 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Irish people insist on voting for FF...
So in a sense, yes the trouble we're in is our own "fault"
It's time we, as a nation, started acting like grown ups and took a little respionsibility for our collective actions.
This victim thing we enjoy pulling when things aren't going our way is getting a bit tiresome.
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
(part II)
I inform myself all the time and I have no interest in smearing the No side, just exposing the audacious lies that they circulate.
As for Nick Griffin, I resent the fact that a bigoted englishman is involving himself in the politics of my country.
yesforworkers 2 years ago
Most of my comments weren't addressed to you. I also doubt that you resent Nick Griffin, in fact you're probably delighted he's involved so you can smear the no side the vast majority of whom are not interested in his policies.
As for Eamonn Dunphy he's a sports pundit.
The guarantees don't change one dot or comma in the treaty.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
I have no idea what faux-outrage is, and I have no interest in responding to all of your comments because you post about a dozen to every one that I put up. But I will respond to the last few-
the treaty is fundamentally different because 46% of people who voted no last time did so on the basis of concerns that have been addressed in the guarantees. You might have noticed that over the weekend arch-sceptic Eamonn Dunphy came out and said he was changing his mind from No to Yes this time.
yesforworkers 2 years ago
The ECJ cannot touch Irish tax, that's in international and European law now, so that will never happen.
There were several reasons why multinatioanals came to Ireland- low tax rate, good infrastructure, stable political environment, educated workforce, EU membership.
If we delete any one of these reasons, such as Eu membership (or sitting on the sidelines of Europe, which is what we'll be doing), they will leave.
That's why i'm voting Yes for jobs.
yesforworkers 2 years ago
Ireland- more investment from the US than India.....China....Brazil-COMBINED.
If we vote no all of these multinational companies- the Hewlett Packards,Intels, Googles etc will have no interest in investing in Ireland.
They want to base themselves in a country that has a voice in Europe.
If we vote No we're essentially voting for all of these companies to gradually leave.
That's why Lisbon is good for workers,because it hangs a big 'open for business' sign over our tattered economy.
yesforworkers 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The EU...making democracy history.
This evening in Berlin,people from all over Germany will be demonstrating against this disgusting treaty. We will be making our voices heard and showing that we support the still free people of Ireland !
The Lisbon treaty is self-amending so it could be Ireland's last vote and Germany's last demonstration. Don't let this happen,vote NO for all our children's sake !
Check out No 2 Lisbon 2 and the EU's own paramilitary : European Gendarmerie Force
Spenner56 2 years ago
Plain and simple arguments, the truth in a nutshell, great. Support for Merkel has significantly dropped in germany. So one of the big supporters of lisbon in the EU might fall. Most germans as well as most europeans would vote against lisbon. Do it for us, irish people. NO to lisbon means NO to lisbon. May God bless you..
Frydward 2 years ago
Irish history has shown that in the face of outside non-Irish oppression that has been pressed upon the people of Ireland that only the Irish from Ulster have had the balls and fortitude to stand up to these foreign filth that would impose their will upon the people of Ireland.
Anyone care to take me up on the argument or are your heads too heavy with the guilt of betrayal?
Little wonder - we travelled South to fight for you and you won't even fight for yourselves.
begorrahsreturn 2 years ago
IRELAND PLEASE VOTE NO
mtst71 2 years ago
NO NO NOOOOO!!!!!!!!
anotherjadedfool 2 years ago
I'm voting NO.
Sambucca 2 years ago
By the way, has anyone noticed the comments lower down by 'Ukipwebmaster'????
the one thing I agree with all of you guys on, whatever about Lisbon is a love for the country. how can you call yourselves nationalists if you're doing the dirty work of the United Kingdom Independence party??!! They want a return to the old imperialist britain.
If u want proof, just check out their website- there's a nice picture of britain in the top right hand corner, complete with the entire Island of Ireland!
yesforworkers 2 years ago
Isn't it incredible that UKIP respected our NO vote while our spineless politicians rejected it on the very day we voted.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
WACI - the irony is that if the 26 counties had kept their fiscal snozzel out of the arse-bangers trough of the EU and retained the Punt then the commie (self-aggrandising and pocket-lining) cunts in Dáil Éireann would have been better armed against the 'recession' whereby those traitorous scum together with Banc Ceannais na hÉireann could have devalued the currency.
begorrahsreturn 2 years ago
It fucking pisses me off that the majority of people (North & South) haven't a baldy fuckin' clue about basic economics and they entrust their all in the hands of a few arrogant, fat-arsed, traitorous sons of whores who would sell you a goat and swear it was a pig.
Give that verbose prick Kenny a chance with the proviso that a referendum be put to the people (as enshrined in Bunreacht na hÉireann) to ABOLISH PR elections,
Fianna Fáil have DESTROYED Ireland.
begorrahsreturn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your opinions are respected by UKIP...
And you're proud of that?
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
You mean our "votes" are respected by UKIP surely? Can't say the same for our own politicians though who have contrived against the voters before the results were even in. Nor Barrosso or Sarkozy who called us "bloody fools". Are you proud of that?
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FF ran an appalling Yes campaign... no, I am not proud of the "bloody fools" tag (when was that actually said by the way?) but it was not a million miles away from the truth
The debate (Lisbon 1) was dominated by issues that are not even effected by the treaty (taxation, abortion, neutrality etc) and the coalition were too inept to refocus discussion.
Unfortunately it seems to be happening again... the COIR poster campaign is absurd.
We need a proper debate centred on the real issues.
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
well, a lot of people in Ireland have become greedy. It's one thing I noticed when I came back. That's why Coir are targeting the lowering of the minimum wage etc.
squidcreek 2 years ago
The strategy for the yes side last time was to ignore the contents of the treaty, demonize the no side and speak in generalities about the EU. The same thing is happening this time again only now they've introduced all these 'personality' groups to try and sell the treaty for them. FF/FG/Lab/GP they're all the same.
The Coír posters have provoked real debate about the EU. Whereas the yes sides posters are full of lies about jobs, the economy and being kicked out of the EU.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Is it fair and truthful to put up posters proclaiming "Minimum wage under Lisbon €1.82?"
It's a nonsensical statement with no basis in fact. Even putting the question mark after it further reduces its value. One get's the impression that inserting the question mark was more of a legal decision!
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
No, it's probably not going to happen unless the ECJ decide that minimum wages distort free movement. However there's a lot of media debate recently about our min wage being too high, so it looks like it's going to be reduced.
The yes side lies about jobs/the economy and being kicked out of the EU are not being exposed by the msm, all the attacks are against the no side, same as last year.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
Now we have the EU using propaganda ads in cinemas and going into schools to campaign about the 'benefits' of the EU. It's starting to reveal itself as the sinister organization it is, that doesn't take no or allow dissent. I hope this treaty is defeated before we are trapped in this nightmare federation.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The ECJ has no jurisdiction over the setting of minimum wage levels in member states.
And where did the figure of €1.82 come from?
The only organisation that will have decision making power when it comes to reducing our minimum wage will be the same political party that the citizens of this country insist on re-electing over and over again.
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
Rubbish, there was no provisions in the treaties to allow our fishing waters be taken over but the EU (EEC) done it anyway. They done the same with our social welfare and immigration policies through the free movement of people directive. The laval judgement has undermined union wages. Can you predict what judgements they are going to make in the future?
btw you haven't said anything about the lies on the yes posters so I assume you are happy with those lies.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You say "rubbish" to the ECJ having no jurisdiction of the setting of minimum wages in member states... So it is your understanding that the ECJ does have jurisdiction?
Perhaps you might point me towards some indication that this might be the case. If this is actually the case, I think you might have stumbled on a major constitutional crisis in the wings.
I am not "happy" with lies but as yet I am am not seeing any from the Yes campaign as blatant as the €1.82 fantasy.
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
I've already addressed this issue, the EU/ECJ have a long history of claiming competence they are not supposed to have. I've given you 3 examples of this and can give more if you want.
You are using the typical yes side tactic of demanding specific Articles in the treaty while ignoring the history of competence creep and ECJ judgements.
Now are you going to show how we can be kicked out of the EU? or how the treaty will give us jobs and save the economy?
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No, I'm afraid you have not... there are many groundless accusations in your posts that unfortunately have little credibility.
Exactly how has the "EU/ECJ" adversely effected Ireland's social welfare policies through free movement? (Free movement being part of the Maastricht which was ratified by us over 15 years ago)
Also keen to see where the Yes campaign is threatening that we will be "kicked out" if we fail to ratify...
Again, no basis in reality
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
The government introduced legislation at the time of the Nice Treaty to stop social welfare tourism and stop anyone entering the country from receiving SW for 2 years. This was overturned by the free movement of people directive in 2004. So you haven't a clue what you're talking about.
One of the main subtexts of the yes side is that we are voting to remain in the EU, hence the deceptive posters about needing to be in the EU.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"You haven't a clue what your talking about"... nice, cheers for that...
You seem to be referring to the habitual residency in Irish social welfare law.
Perhaps you could direct me to a resource that gives an account of how a change to Irish social welfare legislation was attempted and subsequently scuppered by, as you say, "free movement of people directive in 2004"
Am also still keen to see evidence for the "€1.82 minimum wage" claim...
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
I've already given you an account of how our social welfare legislation was usurped. Go look up the Directive 38/EC/2004, I'm not going to do your work for you.
I've already addressed the minimum wage issue and ECJ judgements so I don't know why you keep repeating that I should provide evidence that it cannot come about. Why don't you look into your crystal ball and tell me why it can't? Are you now predicting all future ECJ judgements and on what basis?
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Directive 38/EC/2004 is the EU legislation concerning free movement. That's not useful.
You made the point that the Irish government was over ruled by the ECJ when attempting to enact some of our own legislation.
If you had a link to a newspaper article, that would be extremely helpful.
You have made a number of very important and interesting points but seem unwilling to point us in the direction of any evidence.
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
"If a person has been resident for less than two years they will be presumed not to be habitually resident and it is up to them to prove otherwise, however even if they have been in the country for two years they may not necessarily meet all the requirements of habitual residency"
I can't provide a link on this forum.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes, that is the legislation
You said that the Irish goverenment attempted to introduce social welfare legislation (you were not specific) but were either stopped from doing so or that legislation was overturned in line with Free Movement
I have been unable to find anything online or from any other source substantiating this claim
I have not been able to do so, Nor have you been able to direct me to any online resource to back this up.
Instead you tell me you have "already told me"
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
The quote I posted was from the NCCRI, I can't post a link as Youtube doesn't allow it. I've already said that the Directive undermined this legislation, this was included in Article 24, among others, of the Directive.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
Coir are putting up posters that are pure lies.
Why does its "1.84 minimum wage after Lisbon" poster have a question mark after it??
because it's a complete and utter fabrication. It's referring to a dispute between Germany and Latvia.
Don't be fooled by this people
yesforworkers 2 years ago
UKIP and BNP are not racists. That's just a smear campaign ran by Labor in the UK
squidcreek 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's very debatable!
But not the issue here...
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
of course it's part of the issue. They're big backers of the 'no' campaign in Ireland
squidcreek 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I wasn't aware that the BNP were supporting your campaign...
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
They do, as does UKIP, but they are smeared as racists in England by Labor so anti-lisbon parties like Sinn Fein and reform EU parties like Libertas can't ally with them.
squidcreek 2 years ago
Do you have any idea who Nick Griffin is??
Check out his wikipedia. he's a racist. And don't tell me it's a conspiracy. he's just a racist.
yesforworkers 2 years ago
I don't know or care who Nick Griffin is but I do know who destroyed this country, the exact same people who are telling us we need to vote yes.
Btw you should look at some of the vested interests and shady contacts of Pat Cox and Peter Sutherland, two of the main yesmen supposedly looking out for the interests of this country.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm also not clear about your interpretation of the word "subtext".
The theme is Ireland as part of a two tiered EU (divided into those nation states that did not wish to ratify this treaty and those that did, Ireland being part of the former group)
The "subtext" (as you put it) of being "kicked out" is neither implicit nor explicit in any of the Yes campaign arguments because it is simply not on the table.
Please explain...
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
The subtext is implicit that we're either in or out if you won't acknowledge that then you are being deceptive. You also talk about a two tier Europe, please explain how that can come about?
Also explain how Lisbon will provide jobs and economic security? and what is meant by 'safety' in the yes posters?
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You seem unable to put me right on a couple of fairly obvious points.
I hardly think it, in the interests of a sensible discussion, to be authentic to answer honest questions with unrelated questions.
And so far, according to you, I am "deceptive" and I "don't have a clue what I'm talking about"
I have been extremely polite to you...
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
I've answered every question you've asked but you like to be in the driving seat by asking the questions and ignoring the answers I've given you repeatedly. Now you're playing the 'polite' game. I've answered your questions are you going to do likewise?
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm sorry that you believe that my wanting to inform myself about the Lisbon Treaty is my "being in the driver's seat".
And being polite to people is not a "game"
And as you have made it clear that you do not know who Nick Griffen is, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that you may not be the expert on European politics that I initially thought
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
You're not interested in informing yourself, you're here to smear the no side hence your reference to Nick Griffin and UKIP.
Your being polite is a game in that you are using faux outrage at my tame comments.
I see you haven't answered any of my questions re yes posters lies, agh well didn't expect you would. Better to keep the no side on the backfoot and ignore the yes lies.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You mentioned that you had "never heard" of Nick Griffin.
The most controversial figure to to be elected to the European Parliament during the recent election...
... and you've "never heard" of him?
And you are talking expertly about the inner workings of the EU?
Never got any info from you about the Irish social welfare legislation that was torpedoed by the ECJ.
It's odd, I don't remember that happening.
I am certainly not here to "smear" anybody...
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
I've given you a quote and the source of the article and told you Yt doesn't allow links, this is the heading:
"Proposed Changes in the Social Welfare Code Arising from EU Enlargement"
I've also given you an Article from the Directive which undermined this legislation.
It's clear you aren't going to address the yes side lies and are just repeating yourself at this stage. There's no point debating any further if this is your position.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your position changed from...
..."the EU blew Irish social welfare reform legislation out of the water" to
..."changes in social welfare will happen because of enlargement"
You have also directed me to nothing more than the legislation itself to prove your initial (and untrue) assertion
Not seeing much in the way of "yes side lies". Yet
I am seeing "no supporters" like yourself making thing up on the hoof and then getting irritated and aggressive when asked to provide evidence
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
I did not change my position and why are you putting sentences in quotes which I never said? The 2 year habitual residence no longer applies to the SW payments I referred to in the article. You can look up the Welfare site to confirm this.
You talked about a two tier Europe, how would that come about? Do you consider that to be a lie? Or yes for jobs, is that a lie?
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
Every politician in Ireland respected the last No vote. And if we say No again they'll respect that too. UKIP only respect anything that goes along with their way of thinking, they don't give two hoots about what you want. Have a look at their website- a nice little picture of Ireland in their map of Britain in the corner.
yesforworkers 2 years ago
Really, so how come we're being asked to vote again ON THE EXACT SAME TREATY?
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
We are asked to vote "no" again becasue the boys who support the yes vote have not learned the Meaning of "no" from their partners,Sarcozy:Madame can we do it again.....Lady:NO im tired!!!,Sarcozy:why not,i pay you alot of money,i look after you,Lady:i know you do,but your very small........,put it away its embarassing,Sarcozy:you Bitch,ill wait till you are asleep and then ill pounce like french snail...........
Elevationary 2 years ago
Well, the referendum will be passed tomorrow.
I suppose you guys are just going to have to suck it up...
BetamaxLives03 2 years ago
we will see,smart man.
Elevationary 2 years ago
Lisbon has nothing to do with our sovereignty people. There is a special article inserted which allows us to leave whenever we want. i voting yes because it's good for workers and because we can leave whenever we want.
yesforworkers 2 years ago
We can leave the EU tomorrow if we want as there's nothing stopping us. Under Lisbon we would have to give two years notice and negotiate withdrawl while being powerless for those two years. In the former USSR any country could also withdraw but it never happened because they always had the party leaders in positions of power.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
Ireland recieves more foreign direct investment from the US than China, Brazil and Russia combined. If we left Europe we would lose all our foreign direct investment. It would be mad to leave Europe tomorrow if we have any interest in keeping our jobs.
yesforworkers 2 years ago
Your a yesman troll, voting yes has nothing to do with jobs and you're playing on people's fears. Take your trolling somewhere else or provide evidence that voting yes will somehow secure jobs.
Btw Spain ratified the treaty and they now have 18% unemployment. So take you fearmongering somewhere else, the people are starting to see through the lies.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
Love it!
ukipwebmaster 2 years ago
VOTE NO TO LISBON!
Every vote counts and the next generation is counting on us!!!
ireland2day 2 years ago 2
Yes the next generation is counting on us to actually leave a functioning economy where they do not need to emigrate to other countries for a job!
Protect the economy! Give it hope!. Vote Yes for god sake!
jwwhite021 2 years ago
Protect the economy?
By having it run by dubious foreign crooks and criminals?
DEFEND YOUR PEOPLE AND NATION VOTE NO.
ireland2day 2 years ago 2
If The government had their way we'd probably be all speaking french or german to make those smarmy european bastards seem more at home. it seems nazis are not dead after all with europe calling the shots. steps have to be taken to make sure the e.u. won't get their way anymore, or else our children will end up marrying foreigners, its bad enough that all those stinking polish are around the place without the french coming here too, the place will stink.
SpecterReflector 2 years ago
There are genuine reasons to oppose Lisbon without resorting to this rubbish. Frankly, you sound like a provocateur.
WeAreChangeIreland 2 years ago
i got a 10 page booklet from the referendum commission , 5 pages as gailege 5 in english ! explaining the lisbon treaty ! has anybody seen the lisbon treaty ? its like 4 phone books thick !
if lisbon passes , fianna fail are free to lumber ireland with 90 billion euros of Nama debt ,
vote NO for your grandchildrens sake !
onlygoodhunsadeadun1 2 years ago 5
VOTE NO TO LISBON!
Every vote counts and the next generation is counting on us!!!
PatriotsGame 2 years ago 4
Scotland has been denied the say by anti democratic traitors. please vote NO ireland - for all of us!
stevenmccaw 2 years ago 2
PLEASE IRELAND VOTE FOR NO!!!!!!!!!
germany doesn't give his citizens the possibility to vote!!!!!!!!
tunisianplaya 2 years ago
Brilliant !! Yes the Govt are patronising -- VOTE NO !!!
decbroadcaster 2 years ago
awesome im voting yes lol no way NO for me
steelundergrounder 2 years ago
Nice. Vote no for sure.
Put those links over there >
Would you?
Typamango 2 years ago 2
Vote No.
bravehartmman 2 years ago 4
what he said!
cptstartrek02 2 years ago
When lisbon came areound the first time I was actively against it, I rang Pat McKenna and asked her did she see Bilderberg written all over it, she replied, "yes without a doubt"
antogrimes85 2 years ago 6
5 star ending ;)
GlobalStranger 2 years ago 5