You save wood because it burns down on its self. The flames dont lick at the wood under the coals as they would if you added logs to the top. I started doing this in my wood stove and have saved on wood and have had successful night burns
I didn't see where he said it saved wood. That isn't one of the many advantages of this fire. I've been building fires for 25+ years and learned this technique last year from Paul Schieder from Hedge Hog Leatherworks. I will never go back to the old way. The biggest advantages are: that you never have to mess with it, it burns consistent, and the biggest advantage is that you can even burn wet wood by placing them on the bottom.
I don't see how this "saves" wood? When I build campfires the traditional way(starting with kindling first, then building up) I only use 2-3 large logs every hour, and that's for a decent sized fire for heat, cooking is less and mainly coals.
With this fire, you're blowing a fat load so to speak, you're stacking what 12+ logs, and if it's decent wood, that could all burn quickly if there's some wind.
I don't think this saves wood, I think it wastes it.
@staphinfection the point of this isn't to save wood, its to keep a fire going while you walk away for a few hours and come back without adding wood to the fire
This is a great way to build a fire! It saves fuel because you use a lot less wood then a normal conventional fire. This burns a lot longer and is great for hanging a cooking pot on a tripod. Plus you dont have to keep adding more wood. Done properly it will burn all night long from just a few kilos of wood.
these are generally made with larger timber. you build a empty box at the bottom. then layer each level with smaller stuff leaving the center open. Build a small fire at the top and allow it to burn and drop embers into the middle. you end up with a fire inside of the large box at the bottom.
Not entirely convinced this is the best fire. I've built a lot of them over the years. I would suggest spacing the stacks a bit more and adding smaller fuel between them. This I believe would expedite combustion. I'll have to give it a try. Thanks for the idea.
Comment removed
Subrock203 1 day ago
Buddy your at a camp site with a fire ring with wood you bought from a store what a joke and a waste of wood
Gamecrusher2424 2 days ago
lets see ya try that with damp wood in the dead of winter in the middle of nowhere
mcconnell51 3 days ago
OK, but blablablablablaaaa
zajebaosve 1 week ago
who on hell reads books when camping most normal people go fishing or hiking when camping or just sit around and drink an ice cold beer
fout97 2 weeks ago
Mad props!
aromellc 1 month ago
"the best fire you'll"
wat the fuck rednecks wat the fuck
Maper555 1 month ago
You save wood because it burns down on its self. The flames dont lick at the wood under the coals as they would if you added logs to the top. I started doing this in my wood stove and have saved on wood and have had successful night burns
oakmaster85 2 months ago
@oakmaster85
Sounds good. I'll try it out at home some time :)
brejso 3 days ago
i camp in the wilds of scotland and best fire my arse.
069gypsy 2 months ago
haha! refreshing! you didn't try to look "survivalish' by using flint & steel !
finalsolution14 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
a swedish candle would be better
MsOneiroi77 3 months ago
I didn't see where he said it saved wood. That isn't one of the many advantages of this fire. I've been building fires for 25+ years and learned this technique last year from Paul Schieder from Hedge Hog Leatherworks. I will never go back to the old way. The biggest advantages are: that you never have to mess with it, it burns consistent, and the biggest advantage is that you can even burn wet wood by placing them on the bottom.
wtinnen 3 months ago
I don't see how this "saves" wood? When I build campfires the traditional way(starting with kindling first, then building up) I only use 2-3 large logs every hour, and that's for a decent sized fire for heat, cooking is less and mainly coals.
With this fire, you're blowing a fat load so to speak, you're stacking what 12+ logs, and if it's decent wood, that could all burn quickly if there's some wind.
I don't think this saves wood, I think it wastes it.
staphinfection 3 months ago
@staphinfection Try it before passing judgement.
wtinnen 3 months ago 3
@staphinfection the point of this isn't to save wood, its to keep a fire going while you walk away for a few hours and come back without adding wood to the fire
mike1234567ify 2 months ago
I like the drum or container with the bars on the back side--could cook meat or heat a pot on those bars
micmoable 3 months ago
Now why haven't I ever thought of this! Cool idea :)
norsco272 3 months ago
He means it's upside down because the tiny starter wood, twigs, leaves, tissue are on top instead of the bottom. I'll have to try this.
DiaShanti 3 months ago
looks to me like a right side up pyramid
dendog21 3 months ago
@dendog21 this guy wouldn't know fire from water.... at least he knew it was a pyramid sitting in some direction. Give him a gold star for trying.
DSMANDARIN 2 months ago
nothing like store bought wood
dendog21 3 months ago
This is a great way to build a fire! It saves fuel because you use a lot less wood then a normal conventional fire. This burns a lot longer and is great for hanging a cooking pot on a tripod. Plus you dont have to keep adding more wood. Done properly it will burn all night long from just a few kilos of wood.
MrNativeDancer 4 months ago
thanks for the vid, i never thought about making a fire that way. but i guess that only works if you got really dry wood?
boritomc 4 months ago
when your blowing on a fire dont bllow directly dowwnwards onto it that can put the fire out
get your head a low down as you can and gently blow onto it slowly picking up speed on your blowing
xMrjamjam 4 months ago
these are generally made with larger timber. you build a empty box at the bottom. then layer each level with smaller stuff leaving the center open. Build a small fire at the top and allow it to burn and drop embers into the middle. you end up with a fire inside of the large box at the bottom.
BornRandy62 5 months ago
Cool vid. Thanks for mentioning the various times at which the fire was burning. Will def try this next time I'm out camping.
disillusions 7 months ago
"big wood" lol
"biggest wood you have" lmao
"densest wood you have" ROFLMFAO XD
yukirito666 7 months ago
aka self feedind fire
chicken4247 8 months ago
good video.
Uriel1816 10 months ago
Not entirely convinced this is the best fire. I've built a lot of them over the years. I would suggest spacing the stacks a bit more and adding smaller fuel between them. This I believe would expedite combustion. I'll have to give it a try. Thanks for the idea.
stevesmitty79 11 months ago
so wait i dont need fire starter and all that u used tissue and receipts? no fatwood and all that crap?
kyledagreat27 1 year ago
@jocelynn2007 I have no idea
symtex111 1 year ago
what type of wood looks like oak and mesqiute
jocelynn2007 1 year ago
Forget the fire to keep u warm wen u got a nice laddy like her with u,,,,, wish mine wud cum with me haha. Great vid tho nice work.
oobrianoo 1 year ago
@oobrianoo "Cum with me" ?
KerrankiSuomee 5 days ago
You'll be up all night watching it burn, ha.
symtex111 1 year ago
I'm going to try this out tonight nice tutorial.
partydude111 1 year ago
nice one!!
thornwarbler 1 year ago
@thornwarbler thanks
symtex111 1 year ago