Sibrel a liar. He claims to have a film of the hoax in progress. Where is it? He was arrested for trespassing Neil Armstrong's property. He lies to astronauts to lure them for ambush. He has the gall to curse out Buzz Aldrin who promptly punched him in the jaw. If Buzz was a little younger, he would have got his lying ass kicked. He is a coward and a liar.Nice napkin you schmuck.
@DeadJesus100 The earths magnetic field does strech that far. You obvioulsy know nothing about what you are talking about or what a magnetic field even looks like. You are just some 13 year old troll who has nothing better to do than say people are wrong but then have nothing to back up what you are saying. Get a life.
@DeadJesus100 no again, luckily a fine british education has taught me that there is nothing more dangerous than a lier who believes his lies so much that he refuses all evidence to the contrary. the scary part is when the lier spreads his lies to others who are gullible enough to believe lies. obviously this particular failure will keep spreading lies since he makes money from it
@DeadJesus100 great i know you love making that point but it's hard to take someone seriously who questions whether it's daytime on the moon when we can see light for example and shadows, probably astronomy 101
@DeadJesus100 Because even I sometimes have periods whe I check my hotmail frequently.
And your persistent doubts about the moon landings prove how little you know about physics - if you had any clue about even basic physics you would easily see that moon landing footage is absolutely authentic.
@DeadJesus100 yeah. look seriously no name calling all anything. those pictures are day time in the sense that sun is shining. no moon mission ever had lunar night. it had to be daytime on the moon for moon landings for obvious reasons like seeing rocks and stuff like that but also heating, it would be freezing without an atmosphere
@DeadJesus100 okay enough of this how about i flip this around. we both agree that nasa has the smartest minds in the world whether they landed on the moon or creayed the greatest hoax ever and say you could see stars in daylight do you really think they'd make mistake like that?
@DeadJesus100 ever seen the northern lights? proof of the magnetic field. which of corse deflect radiation. sorry your argument is so poor i'm guess you're 13
@DeadJesus100 yeah it is, at least it looks english. but hey what does an english man from cambridge know about the english language. for the record you're losing the argument badly now since most of your retorts have been grammar/spelling related which is bad anyway more so in a society full of typos. sorry
Bart just scratches the surface about all the evidence of the faked Moon landings. Let's say I knew a couple of people at McDonell Douglass who told me all about it. One of these people, who is no longer with us, go all the way back to Douglas Aircraft Company.
Whether Kaysing was an engineer or a party clown, HE WAS WRONG! He never designed a spacecraft, airplane, car, bicycle or even a cardboard box. You can call a cow a horse, but it's still a cow. Kaysing was trained to publish stuff. He then went on to demonstrate that he was NOT a scientist and any PhD on earth will concur with that assessment.
@xismxist, Kaysing was CALLED an engineer...IN 1958!! He had NO engineering education whatsoever. He was an English major, a furniture maker and an he did page layout of technical manuals. He wouldn't know how to design a rocket engine if he had to save his mother to do it! He probably couldn't fold a paper airplane. You may have him as your hoax theory champion. I'll take 1,000s of aerospace engineers, physicists & other PhDs. Keep trying.
@xismxist "provided technical support for actions like equipment processing, transportation, installation, check-out, and for the launch itself" In '63 when Kaysing left Rocketdyne, they had not integrated any of their designs with Apollo. A "service engineer" was a name they gave any grunt with a wrench. He lugged around tools, moved parts and logged actions. And no matter how much he did, he would NEVER have any authority or expertise to say anything valuable about engines.
@LunarTuner your excuses has gone from worse to laughable, idiots of your kind did always said Kaysing only worked at a library but now when Jarrah proved your idiots wrong(as usually) you come up with next excuse: "service engineer was a name they gave any grunt with a wrench" so where did you heard that laughable excuse in the frist place? from the stupid babyface look alike jay windley? or from the other proven liar, the pedophile phil plait?!
@xismxist, A "technical support for actions like equipment processing, transportation, installation, check-out, and for the launch itself" Translation: he managed & transported equipment for guys who know how to use it. He knew NOTHING about engine design, flying, aerodynamics, avionics, electrical components, fluid mechanics, propulsion, structural loads! NO EDUCATION ON THIS! He never studied Calculus or differential equations. He was dumber than an average high school physics teacher! Pppft!
@LunarTuner Stop with your fraud accussations your stupid LIAR. Kaysing knew alot about rocket engines therefore he was TECHNICAL SUPPORT, and SERVICE ENGINEER too. The hate you have picked up from Plait & Windley is pure BULLSHIT.
@xismxist, I don't hate anyone and I have not told a single lie. The truth that even Jarrah admits is that Kaysing did NOT have a scientific education. He had an English degree. You can call a rat "a bird" all day long it still won't fly. That's the DAMN truth!
If Kaysing had a BS in engineering, and NO job at Rocketdyne, I'd listen to him more. As it is, he knew about as much about aerospace as a General Motors assembly line worker knows about designing a Corvette.
@LunarTuner I prefer listen to Kaysing then to you, especially when it comes to rocket motors. If he said it should been a crater under the LM then it should been - period. You dont know a SHIT, but he did. Else he would never have worked at Rocketdyne as a TECHNICAL SUPPORT and SERVICE ENGINEER try to understand that!
@xismxist Yeah! You may have your English major as your champion. Good luck with that.
I chose to listen to aerospace engineers, astrophysicists and other who can do differential equations. Gee, I hope they're as smart as your furniture maker :-o
@LunarTuner SO which are those aerospace engineers who claims the LM wouldnt leave any crater when landing on moon? As far as i understand, the few who claims it wouldnt did correct themself after NASA orginal film & photos, they did not actually investigate it themselfs. Look at the "Rocket lunar chalenge" (or what the name was) here at utub, and ask yourself the simply question: why is the rocket take off AND landing on a specific landing plate? why not have it landing on lose surface instead?
@xismxist, In case you forgot, there is air on earth. That means if you test a rocket's thrust against "lose surface" you won't be able to see the rocket. It will create a dust cloud. That doesn't happen on the moon, because even the tiniest particle of dust falls to the moon immediately--just as fast as a 20 ton rock would fall. The point of testing a rocket is to observe it--not obscure it with dust. DUH!
@LunarTuner If any, in case YOU forgot, the lack of air on the moon would make the crater even bigger than imagination. Kaysing said the LM should have disapear into its own blast crater, and i would agree. Why have a "lunar" rocket challenge here on earth when they arent even landing it on a sand(or regolith) surface? thats not much of a challenge...
@xismxist, how do you explain that the Ranger, Luna and Surveyor spacecraft also didn't leave craters? Can you even show me one photo of one crater created by any landing craft anywhere?
@LunarTuner Ranger, Surveyor = possible fake im not sure. But it doesnt matter, you cant compare the small Surveyor with the big and heavy LM. And about Luna, theres no good pictures to say if theres any crater or not, the only pictures that exists is taken from the Lunochod and is not of any good quality. And i already explained for you that theres a reason why rockets take off and lands on a hard surface, and so does the Harrier, in one case it left a huge crater when landing on lose surface.
@xismxist, how convenient. It doesn't fit your paradigm, so it's deemed fake.
Show me your "one case". I wanna see this huge crater. If not, don't worry, because a 20,000 lb Harrier (or more) can't compare with a 3,000 lb. LM....
@LunarTuner Like the LM, Harrier arent landing with full trottle either(only a retarded propagandists would asume that) it uses 10,000 lbs of thrust when landing and then it have 4 exhausts which will be 2,500 lbs each. Those exhausts are under the wings, many many feets from the ground to compare with ONE 3000 lbs exhaust on LM, only INCHES from ground. And most important, there's no air between the LM and the surface on the moon to slow the exhaust down... which IS the case with the Harrier.
@xismxist, at landing on the moon, the downward force of lunar gravity on the LM is between 2,600 and 3,000 lbs. That is the thrust necessary to keep in hoovering. At landing on earth, the downward force of EARTH gravity on a half-fueled Harrier GR9 is about 22,000 lbs. Therefore, it must produce 22,000 lbs. of downward thrust at landing. If you use 10,000 lbs. of thrust to land a 22,000 lb. object...
@LunarTuner OMFG! the engine peaks out at less than 24,000 lbs and you asume it uses 22,000 lbs in order to do a vertical landing LOL - thats a TROLL talking, again you proved yourself to be a proven LIAR.
@xismxist, how the hell can a vertical take-off and landing aircraft even fly if its total vertical thrust is less than its weight? Explain that, Einstein? Look, the Harrier can weigh a total of 31,000 lbs., but with that load, it won't take off or land vertically-IT CAN'T! There's only one Harrier, completely EMPTY that lands with 10,000 lbs. of thrust. That's still not the 3,000 lbs. of a LM in a vacuum w/o ambient pressure to funnel the thrust.
@LunarTuner Are you for real?! only in your(and other propagandists trolls) world the Harrier would use same thrust when take off as it would when landing, but thats not the case and you didnt know that. Do dome research, Harrier is landing with around 10,000 lbs of thrust and why do you ignore the FACTS? like 1, Harrier has 4 exhausts. 2, They are under the wings, several feets from the ground. 3, On earth we have AIR which will slow the exhaust down... so yes LM's 3000 lbs SHOULD make a crater
@LunarTuner Thats because you still dont get it(?!) and ask the guy who posted that about the harrier and the crater, not me! atleast i gave you an example... and i gave you a other hint: all rockets in "lunar landing challenge" is landing on a hard surface. Only a fool would expect the LM to survive a landing on lose surface in a totaly unknown terrain.
@LunarTuner Pixels left a small blast crater - in CONCRETE, and thats from 500 lbs of thrust. You can see that by watching Jarrahs "no crater" series. (wondering what your excuses will be this time l0l)
@xismxist, Pixel BURNED concrete by sitting on top of it for 30 seconds. It cracked concrete with HEAT-INDUCED SPALLING! That's not a BLAST crater. You think something that wouldn't create so much heat but had the same thrust would do the same thing to the concrete? Oh please. :D :D :D
@LunarTuner It is, therefore i said "small crater" and if a howering of 30s would do that then imagine what the LM engine would do during ONE MINUTE to loose surface like the moon.
@xismxist One minute hovering 4 feet above it's landing spot? Huh? Which LM did that? No LM even hovered at all! It was constantly dropping at a diagonal angle. You have to resort to making stuff up? You get funnier all the time! :D
@LunarTuner If LM was "dropping at a diagonal angle" and not landed verticaly, then where's the long trails alongs the surface? the last minute it landed verticaly, or do you believe NASA is liars and the original footage is BS? if the engine is powerful enough to kicking up dust while the LM is 100ft from the surface, then imagine what impact it should had make at touchdown - how many times must i repeat this for you? your nothing than an ignorant TROLL
Show me ANY crater from ANY vehicle in the universe! You can imagine a crater all you want, but if you want us to believe the LM would make a deep, beautiful, sharp-rimmed crater like something you saw in a Bugs Bunny cartoon, you have to show some kind of real example somewhere.......and apparently you can't. Hmmmm....wonder why.
@LunarTuner I did gave you 2 examples: pixels and harrier! can you explain to me why there wasnt any long blasting trails alongs the surface after the LM? because it would had been if we choose to believe YOUR landing version.
tweekerhead, you are a dim-witted Pro-Apollo-Pimp touting the phony, tawdry wares of Nixon's diseased whore called Project Apollo! Being a half-wit, the CIA doesn't even pay pond-life like you to time-waste and clog up Apollo Fraud threads. I pity anyone afflicted with NASA's cock stuck in their mouths and having to swallow NASA's jiss for the rest of their lives.
Get swallowing! Force a grin and keep telling your fellow Apollo patsies that NASA's horse-dung jiss tastes real good!
This guy Tweekerhead seems to be trying to fill up page 1 to get all the hoax-believer posts out of the viewers sight. All we can do to thwart that tactic is to post the evidence often. Here's a link to some of the hoax evidence.
I'm not the one to tell anyone what to do with their block buttons...but, for christ's sake, if you ever needed proof that this guy was a low-class genus of Troll, then the last few posts he's slammed on your video is it!
Let him stay, you increase your hit count...But at what cost...
OMG you're makin' me laff' like bitch...pls. stop...I'm rollin' here...Thank you, I needed this. Great comedy act.....it's an act right? Oh shit ...I'm sorry, you really this stupid?
Next time you shills wanna' open your mouth and say they couldn't land the Bedstead'/ Lunar Lander on Earth let alone on the Moon, better look at this vid' first before you open it and make a fool outta' yourselves.....like that ever stopped em' before.
I've already explained to you that the flying bedsted footage is very carefully EDITED NASA PROPAGANDA..
What part of that death trap contraption CRASHED, almost killing Armstrong, do you not understand ??? .. The "landing" footage was edited in later to make it look like that piece of shit could really fly, when it couldn't.
@straydog02 "The "landing" footage was edited in later to make it look like that piece of shit could really fly, when it couldn't."
Oh come on now bro...It could fly...Just not for very long, and landing the damn thing, without wheels.....forget it!
You know that troll your engaging is another one of the despicable moron types right? He doesn't deserve another minute of your time bro! Not even for the mental gymnastics off his demented cerebellum!
Ok Nimrod, let's go with the shielding... If the LEM needed shielding to protect the Astronauts from radiation, what kind of radiation does it need to shield the inhabitants from? alpha,beta or gamma? Look it up on Wiki' if you need to.
This'll' be good.....
Be careful...this could be a trap, don't play yourself.
Did you know major solar flars were going on during all the apollo missions and the tin foil spacecraft they flew in wasn't designed to handle that kind of radiation or much of any kind for that matter? .You may want to look into these things a bit huh?
Hey Stray, you see the desperate little troll vying for attention. These trolls are all the same. I guess his mommy doesn't give him much attention as he types his nonsense in her basement.
Wonder if these trolls are aware that the Dutch government found out their moonrock is a piece of petrified wood. How embarassing for those Apollo Fairy Tale believers out there!!!
It's so sad these trolls waste their time droning on instead of educating themselves about the true nature of space!
This troll doesn't have a freakin clue! .. Have you seen what he considers to be "proof" that Apollo happened as advertised? .. So far his "debate" consists of nothing but silly NASA propaganda videos.. and then he sez he's "spanking the hoax shills" .. This clown is TOO FUNNY !
@straydog02 I pick peanuts outta' my shit in the morning bigger than your brain shill boy. Next time you and Bart are at the drive-in makin' out, just think of all the dicks that have been in his mouth, and from what I've seen it's a pretty big mouth. I wish I could tell you closed minded idiots the truth, but then I'd have to find and kill you both. Please keep the funny typing comin', you're makin' my night.
Thanks for proving what sick little freak you really are .. It's pretty amusing watching low life trash like you defend government scams like Apollo.
Too bad you're too much of a chicken shit to debate me .. It would have been fun proving what an ignorant little monkey you are .. Oh wait, you already proved that all by yourself.
I"N YOUR OWN WORDS PROVE TO US ALL THE MOON LANDINGS WERE A HOAX......PROVE IT!"
BART SIBREL ALREADY PROVED IT IN HIS INTERVIEWS WITH THE "ASTRONAUTS GONE WILD".. HE PROVED THOSE CLOWNS ARE LIARS WHO CAN'T GET THEIR ALLEGED MOON TRIP STORIES STRAIGHT.. THEIR LONG LIST OF CONTRADICTIONS TO EACH OTHER , PROVES THAT APOLLO WAS A SCAM.. SIBREL ALSO PROVED THAT WHEN CONFRONTED WITH THE HOAX EVIDENCE AND QUESTIONS THEY DON'T LIKE, THEY ALL RUN AWAY LIKE A PACK OF COWARDS.
@straydog02 Nope, Sibrel proved nothing, just that he's a stalker tryin' to sell his crappy movie.
And about my spelling, as if I give a shit, you've FAILED again, you didn't notice I used up all my 500 characters, and in doing so, I had to contract and misspell some words.
The fact that you caught that "your" mistake proves how smart you are!
You really destroyed me with that one, you seem really intelligent, but then again you believe in the Moon landing hoax. Keep tryin' to prove it JR.
Sorry to burst your little Apollo Fantasyland bubble, but Sibrel proved the Apollo astro-NOTS are lying cowards, who all run away whenever anyone questions them about their alleged moon trips.. None of them got their stories straight, so it looks like all that NASA debriefing and brainwashning was for nothing.
Nice try with trying to explain away why you can't spell either.. I just about spewed my coffee out laughing over that one!
@straydog02 Naa, Nope, Sibrel didn't prove a thing, and you didn't burst anyone's bubble. The facts just aren't there.THERE IN YOUR HEAD.
Do you guys realize that Kaysing with BA. in English is the only person in the hoaxtard camp. There's not one other person with a degree shouting and insulting Apollo believer. No PhD's , no one with any credentials.
So small time, PROVE IT IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Have you ever studied a Moon rock? Every country including Russia has em', 800lbs. brought back.
Actually, Sibrel proved that the Apollo astronots are liars. None of them ever get their stories straight about what it was like to allegedly fly to, land on, and walk on the Moon. For instance, Cernan claimed that both he and Armstrong landed their LM's the exact same way, yet the A11 story sez that Neil shut off the LM engine AFTER he landed, while the A17 story claims that the LM engine was shut off BEFORE it landed.
"Kaysing with BA. in English is the only person in the hoaxtard camp."
Of all the dumb apollogist claims, that has to be the dumbest one so far.
Kaysing was a ex Rocketdyne engineer .. He knew for a fact that the technology available during Apollo could have never gotten men safely to the Moon and back. Plus, Kaysing was only one of many educated researchers, some with PhDs, who've helped expose the Apollo scam.
You really don't have a clue what you're talking about.
"So small time, PROVE IT IN YOUR OWN WORDS Have you ever studied a Moon rock? Every country including Russia has em', 800lbs. brought back."
I'm glad you brought this subject . The Apollo 11 fake petrified wood "rock" aside, nobody has ever seen all of the ALLEGED 840 lbs of Apollo "moon" rocks. NASA claims they are all locked away in in one of their armed guarded vaults but nobody has ever seen ALL 840 lbs. of the lunar rubble, so we only have their word for it . cont.
A few small "moon" rocks are in museums, but they have never been tested by any scientist.. So the samples which have been studied are only the size of grains of rice, or tiny little slivers, or sand .. All of which could have been scooped up by unmanned missions.
Did you know that the properties of the Apollo "moon" rocks don't match that of the Soviet samples?
@straydog02 Nope wrong again, 8oolbs.+ rocks all over the world, even Russia has em'.
Kaysing worked at Rocketdyne, from 56' to 63' BUT NOT AS AN ENGINEER! Kaysing was the company's head of technical publications but was not trained as an engineer or scientist. FACT.
Well, there's another stupid lie debunk. Owned......Next Please
Nope, wrong again .. The Russians haven't seen the alleged 800+ lbs of moon rocks either, but the Dutch have seen one wooden one!
Kaysing was both head of technical publcations and also an ENGINEER.. If you had a clue what you were talking about, you would know that FACT! .. Instead you just parrot typical NASA propaganda like a good little brainwashed troll.
@straydog02Wrong..... If you had a clue what you were talking about, you would know that FACT! .. Instead you just parrot typical Hoaxtard' propaganda like a good little brainwashed troll.
@straydog02 Mr. Kaysing received his Bachelor of Arts in English in 1949 from the University of Southern California. Those are his academic credentials. He worked for Rocketdyne chiefly as a writer and a librarian.
I have found a film of him at Rocketdyne circa 61'.
watch?v=3bS32-6jMXw
I believe it is absolutely 100% real.
I wonder why NASA didn't kill him for being such a thorn in their side?
After all the "debriefing" , my guess is maybe a few of those brainwashed Apollo fly boys might pass a poly .. Well, at least the ones who really believe they went to the Moon anyway, like Buzz the Clown... Mr. Armstrong never was comfortable about being forced to lie for NASA though .. At least you have to admire him for that and also for not wanting to take credit for something he didn't do.
To quoite Neil; "I'don't deserve it, NASA just placed me in that ROLE."
@stalkervision Yeah some of em' are, it's called transference, I'm trying to make a point, how you hoaxtards start chiming in as you are, and insulting people for what they believe. This isn't spreading knowledge or related to science in anyway, You guys are just clambering for attention, and want you and the world to see how smart you are without do any work or research.
How many hoaxtards does it take to change a light bulb?
10...one to change it and 9 to say they could've done it better.
@Tweekerhead "trying to make a point" That's a good one. Starting by talking about feces I suppose? The people who have done FAR more of the insulting over the years are the apollo moonbat clan. You start by insulting people what can you expect back? Then an insult at the end of your post of course. You proved MY POINT for me.
@Tweekerhead I don't believe anyone got rich off of any of this tweeter because if they had you would have never let them live it down. You talk about insults? LMAO It's the pot calling the kettle back.
@stalkervision yeah...whatever Sparky, I enjoyed spanking you guys, you guys haven't produced one piece of evidence or one fact to prove let alone create a doubt to support your position, but hey, science isn't on your side.
Dx = ½ a t2 And you're ascending and descending the Moon And all ya' need is this then...
Sibrel a liar. He claims to have a film of the hoax in progress. Where is it? He was arrested for trespassing Neil Armstrong's property. He lies to astronauts to lure them for ambush. He has the gall to curse out Buzz Aldrin who promptly punched him in the jaw. If Buzz was a little younger, he would have got his lying ass kicked. He is a coward and a liar.Nice napkin you schmuck.
pastbe4us 1 month ago
@pastbe4us SIBREL IS TELLING THE TRUTH THE ASTRO-NOTS ARE THE LIARS!
tenthousandyearsgoon 3 weeks ago
This is the best interview Sibrel has given IMO. It's a shame it had to be on some 'religious' radio show but listen up anyway.
tjrxk7 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 The earths magnetic field does strech that far. You obvioulsy know nothing about what you are talking about or what a magnetic field even looks like. You are just some 13 year old troll who has nothing better to do than say people are wrong but then have nothing to back up what you are saying. Get a life.
ThePurp1e0range 1 month ago
Oh yeah the guy that works for NASA that told you it was fake is now dead. Very convinient for you there.
ThePurp1e0range 1 month ago
This guy isn't a christian.
ThePurp1e0range 1 month ago
This was the best interview of Sibrel. Weird how it's on a 'Christian' show. You don't need to be a Christian to see or uncover a hoax.
tjrxk7 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bart Sibrel was a Hero
Exposing the Nasa Apollo astronauts for the lying scumbags that they are
but its a pity he has become a dead jesus freak
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
APOLLO DISNEY TV
1968-1972
NASA FAKE SCIENCE
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
this is so shit i nearly got AIDS, why do people to indulge in this tripe and give him money.
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago in playlist Moon Hoax: Bart Sibrel
@MasterOfDickery i bet you got aids long ago
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 thankfully i always use protection, especially when i'm around infectious lies like this. in this case my protection is common sense
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery lol you caught the virus years ago retard
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 no again, luckily a fine british education has taught me that there is nothing more dangerous than a lier who believes his lies so much that he refuses all evidence to the contrary. the scary part is when the lier spreads his lies to others who are gullible enough to believe lies. obviously this particular failure will keep spreading lies since he makes money from it
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery LOL a fine british education and this retard can not even spell "LIER"
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 oh well obviously spelling is so important to you that you can ignore all points made
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery the only point that you made fuckwit was about the word "LIER"
and you can not even spell that word.
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 great i know you love making that point but it's hard to take someone seriously who questions whether it's daytime on the moon when we can see light for example and shadows, probably astronomy 101
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery read my quote dickhead
Melville the Space Tourist said
"Seeing the bright blue sky turning pitch black and seeing stars appear while it is daytime is absolutely
mind blowing"
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
Pity he has to fuck up the interview speaking about jesus fucking christ
Burn the Evil Bible
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
Thumbs Up for '69
MalarkyD 6 months ago
Bart sibrel is an idiot.
Laurelindo 6 months ago
@Laurelindo
Bart Sibrel is a real Hero
you are the idiot
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
@DeadJesus100 How much time do you spend on Youtube anyway?
Don't you have anything better to do than ONLY commenting on moon hoax videos?
Because judging by the frequency of your posts you really do spend all your time here.
Laurelindo 4 months ago
@Laurelindo why are you replying to me on youtube immediately you dirty TROLL?
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
@DeadJesus100 Because even I sometimes have periods whe I check my hotmail frequently.
And your persistent doubts about the moon landings prove how little you know about physics - if you had any clue about even basic physics you would easily see that moon landing footage is absolutely authentic.
Study some physics or be quiet, please.
Laurelindo 4 months ago
@Laurelindo LOL amoron like yourself would have hotmail, too poor for a personal email.
Monkey phsyics thats what the fake moonlandings were all about.
You are mentally backwards and i will prove it now.
Tell us what protects the moon from cosmic radiation monkey troll?
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
@DeadJesus100 you're a real idiot.
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago in playlist Moon Hoax: Bart Sibrel
@MasterOfDickery you're a real moron fuckhead
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 you;re just another idiot looking for a anti america cause to distract you from the personal failures suffered with in your own life.
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery lol fagboy let me show youtubers what a moron you really are.
Tell us why were there no stars in Nasa's Fake Apollo missions?
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 *yawns* when it's day time look up and tell me if you see stars.
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery LOL all dumb queers always "yawn"
Armstriong said the sky is black in space
Is that daytime asswipe?
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 yeah. look seriously no name calling all anything. those pictures are day time in the sense that sun is shining. no moon mission ever had lunar night. it had to be daytime on the moon for moon landings for obvious reasons like seeing rocks and stuff like that but also heating, it would be freezing without an atmosphere
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery shit for brains
In space the sky is BLACK
Melville the 2nd Space Tourist said
"Seeing the bright blue sky turning pitch black and seeing stars appear while it is daytime is absolutely
mind blowing"
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 just goggle picture iss plenty of pictures of the space station with out stars
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery Google USSR space dickhead
USSR took pictures of stars in space
Shutlle Discovery did as well
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 okay enough of this how about i flip this around. we both agree that nasa has the smartest minds in the world whether they landed on the moon or creayed the greatest hoax ever and say you could see stars in daylight do you really think they'd make mistake like that?
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery Nasa is the Joke of History
The smartest minds that Fake space missions
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 again thats a really poor retort, you are really losing this argument now
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery theer is no argument here. I am only showing youtubers what a moron you are
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 actually i just won. you failed completely to address my point 3 times and just looked like a real idiot.
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery hickoty dickory dock
Yes you won the MORON of the years award :)
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 no that was you lol
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery you are a MORON
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery the earths magnetic field protects the moon?
What medication are you on?
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 ever seen the northern lights? proof of the magnetic field. which of corse deflect radiation. sorry your argument is so poor i'm guess you're 13
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MasterOfDickery Explain how the earths magnetic field protects the moon from radiation you fucking retard?
The moon is 240,000 miles from earth you fucking retard
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery
You're right, but try to ignore this fool. He's just another follow up from Humanmonkey.
Rob260259 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery theer = there
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 omfg another typo amazing!!! you have no lost the argument
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery What protects the moon against radiation retard?
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
too easy.The Earth's
Magnetic Field
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery Lol the earths magnetic field protects the moon?
The moon is 240,000 miles away idiot
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery is a 12 year old fucking idiot kid
"look seriously no name calling all anything"
Thats not even english idiot
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 yeah it is, at least it looks english. but hey what does an english man from cambridge know about the english language. for the record you're losing the argument badly now since most of your retorts have been grammar/spelling related which is bad anyway more so in a society full of typos. sorry
MasterOfDickery 2 months ago
@MasterOfDickery You are an idiot kid
Ok let me ask you another question chump
What protects the lunar syrface against cosmic radiation?
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
Christian=Truth???? Hahahahahaha.... Bull shit!!!!
LtModigliani 7 months ago
Bart just scratches the surface about all the evidence of the faked Moon landings. Let's say I knew a couple of people at McDonell Douglass who told me all about it. One of these people, who is no longer with us, go all the way back to Douglas Aircraft Company.
1FalseFlagUSA 7 months ago
What an embarrassment and disappointment to his fathers name.
EffinDre 7 months ago
"at some point u became a christian...and u became interested in the truth"
LLLLLLOOOOLLLLL...
Rapt0r1202 9 months ago 12
Sibrel is full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature ejaculations.
billyc881 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@billyc881 How would you know he's full of premature ejaculations? Someone not satified with Mr.Sibrel's performance.
kdogg1000 9 months ago
You all need to suppose your statement with some verifyable facts and at least some semi-blance logic.....just check thing before you say it
THREESIXNINE100 11 months ago
Whether Kaysing was an engineer or a party clown, HE WAS WRONG! He never designed a spacecraft, airplane, car, bicycle or even a cardboard box. You can call a cow a horse, but it's still a cow. Kaysing was trained to publish stuff. He then went on to demonstrate that he was NOT a scientist and any PhD on earth will concur with that assessment.
LunarTuner 11 months ago
@LunarTuner U talk alot of bullshit as usually. Kaysing was an engineer.
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, Kaysing was CALLED an engineer...IN 1958!! He had NO engineering education whatsoever. He was an English major, a furniture maker and an he did page layout of technical manuals. He wouldn't know how to design a rocket engine if he had to save his mother to do it! He probably couldn't fold a paper airplane. You may have him as your hoax theory champion. I'll take 1,000s of aerospace engineers, physicists & other PhDs. Keep trying.
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner You proved yourself to be that proven LIAR i always knew your were, DIPSHIT /watch?v=oyzlZkTwYRo
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist "provided technical support for actions like equipment processing, transportation, installation, check-out, and for the launch itself" In '63 when Kaysing left Rocketdyne, they had not integrated any of their designs with Apollo. A "service engineer" was a name they gave any grunt with a wrench. He lugged around tools, moved parts and logged actions. And no matter how much he did, he would NEVER have any authority or expertise to say anything valuable about engines.
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner your excuses has gone from worse to laughable, idiots of your kind did always said Kaysing only worked at a library but now when Jarrah proved your idiots wrong(as usually) you come up with next excuse: "service engineer was a name they gave any grunt with a wrench" so where did you heard that laughable excuse in the frist place? from the stupid babyface look alike jay windley? or from the other proven liar, the pedophile phil plait?!
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, A "technical support for actions like equipment processing, transportation, installation, check-out, and for the launch itself" Translation: he managed & transported equipment for guys who know how to use it. He knew NOTHING about engine design, flying, aerodynamics, avionics, electrical components, fluid mechanics, propulsion, structural loads! NO EDUCATION ON THIS! He never studied Calculus or differential equations. He was dumber than an average high school physics teacher! Pppft!
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner Stop with your fraud accussations your stupid LIAR. Kaysing knew alot about rocket engines therefore he was TECHNICAL SUPPORT, and SERVICE ENGINEER too. The hate you have picked up from Plait & Windley is pure BULLSHIT.
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, I don't hate anyone and I have not told a single lie. The truth that even Jarrah admits is that Kaysing did NOT have a scientific education. He had an English degree. You can call a rat "a bird" all day long it still won't fly. That's the DAMN truth!
If Kaysing had a BS in engineering, and NO job at Rocketdyne, I'd listen to him more. As it is, he knew about as much about aerospace as a General Motors assembly line worker knows about designing a Corvette.
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner I prefer listen to Kaysing then to you, especially when it comes to rocket motors. If he said it should been a crater under the LM then it should been - period. You dont know a SHIT, but he did. Else he would never have worked at Rocketdyne as a TECHNICAL SUPPORT and SERVICE ENGINEER try to understand that!
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist Yeah! You may have your English major as your champion. Good luck with that.
I chose to listen to aerospace engineers, astrophysicists and other who can do differential equations. Gee, I hope they're as smart as your furniture maker :-o
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner SO which are those aerospace engineers who claims the LM wouldnt leave any crater when landing on moon? As far as i understand, the few who claims it wouldnt did correct themself after NASA orginal film & photos, they did not actually investigate it themselfs. Look at the "Rocket lunar chalenge" (or what the name was) here at utub, and ask yourself the simply question: why is the rocket take off AND landing on a specific landing plate? why not have it landing on lose surface instead?
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, In case you forgot, there is air on earth. That means if you test a rocket's thrust against "lose surface" you won't be able to see the rocket. It will create a dust cloud. That doesn't happen on the moon, because even the tiniest particle of dust falls to the moon immediately--just as fast as a 20 ton rock would fall. The point of testing a rocket is to observe it--not obscure it with dust. DUH!
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner If any, in case YOU forgot, the lack of air on the moon would make the crater even bigger than imagination. Kaysing said the LM should have disapear into its own blast crater, and i would agree. Why have a "lunar" rocket challenge here on earth when they arent even landing it on a sand(or regolith) surface? thats not much of a challenge...
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, how do you explain that the Ranger, Luna and Surveyor spacecraft also didn't leave craters? Can you even show me one photo of one crater created by any landing craft anywhere?
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner Ranger, Surveyor = possible fake im not sure. But it doesnt matter, you cant compare the small Surveyor with the big and heavy LM. And about Luna, theres no good pictures to say if theres any crater or not, the only pictures that exists is taken from the Lunochod and is not of any good quality. And i already explained for you that theres a reason why rockets take off and lands on a hard surface, and so does the Harrier, in one case it left a huge crater when landing on lose surface.
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, how convenient. It doesn't fit your paradigm, so it's deemed fake.
Show me your "one case". I wanna see this huge crater. If not, don't worry, because a 20,000 lb Harrier (or more) can't compare with a 3,000 lb. LM....
...but show me our "one case".
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner Like the LM, Harrier arent landing with full trottle either(only a retarded propagandists would asume that) it uses 10,000 lbs of thrust when landing and then it have 4 exhausts which will be 2,500 lbs each. Those exhausts are under the wings, many many feets from the ground to compare with ONE 3000 lbs exhaust on LM, only INCHES from ground. And most important, there's no air between the LM and the surface on the moon to slow the exhaust down... which IS the case with the Harrier.
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, at landing on the moon, the downward force of lunar gravity on the LM is between 2,600 and 3,000 lbs. That is the thrust necessary to keep in hoovering. At landing on earth, the downward force of EARTH gravity on a half-fueled Harrier GR9 is about 22,000 lbs. Therefore, it must produce 22,000 lbs. of downward thrust at landing. If you use 10,000 lbs. of thrust to land a 22,000 lb. object...
...do I even need to complete the sentence?
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner OMFG! the engine peaks out at less than 24,000 lbs and you asume it uses 22,000 lbs in order to do a vertical landing LOL - thats a TROLL talking, again you proved yourself to be a proven LIAR.
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, how the hell can a vertical take-off and landing aircraft even fly if its total vertical thrust is less than its weight? Explain that, Einstein? Look, the Harrier can weigh a total of 31,000 lbs., but with that load, it won't take off or land vertically-IT CAN'T! There's only one Harrier, completely EMPTY that lands with 10,000 lbs. of thrust. That's still not the 3,000 lbs. of a LM in a vacuum w/o ambient pressure to funnel the thrust.
Now, say something stupid in response.
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner Are you for real?! only in your(and other propagandists trolls) world the Harrier would use same thrust when take off as it would when landing, but thats not the case and you didnt know that. Do dome research, Harrier is landing with around 10,000 lbs of thrust and why do you ignore the FACTS? like 1, Harrier has 4 exhausts. 2, They are under the wings, several feets from the ground. 3, On earth we have AIR which will slow the exhaust down... so yes LM's 3000 lbs SHOULD make a crater
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist Blah, blah, blah...same crap repeated.
When are going to show me a sample of a crater created by a Harrier or a helicopter or ANYTHING?
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner Thats because you still dont get it(?!) and ask the guy who posted that about the harrier and the crater, not me! atleast i gave you an example... and i gave you a other hint: all rockets in "lunar landing challenge" is landing on a hard surface. Only a fool would expect the LM to survive a landing on lose surface in a totaly unknown terrain.
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist SHOW ME THE CRATER!
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner you need to contact the guy who wrote it in the forum to get it explained more in detail, easy as that!
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, No, I don't. If YOU want me to believe a crater has been created by any kind of vehicle then YOU....YOU need to .....
SHOW ME THE CRATER!
Otherwise, I have no reason to read your drivel anymore. I'm a satisfied mind, Bub.
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner Pixels left a small blast crater - in CONCRETE, and thats from 500 lbs of thrust. You can see that by watching Jarrahs "no crater" series. (wondering what your excuses will be this time l0l)
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, Pixel BURNED concrete by sitting on top of it for 30 seconds. It cracked concrete with HEAT-INDUCED SPALLING! That's not a BLAST crater. You think something that wouldn't create so much heat but had the same thrust would do the same thing to the concrete? Oh please. :D :D :D
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner It is, therefore i said "small crater" and if a howering of 30s would do that then imagine what the LM engine would do during ONE MINUTE to loose surface like the moon.
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist One minute hovering 4 feet above it's landing spot? Huh? Which LM did that? No LM even hovered at all! It was constantly dropping at a diagonal angle. You have to resort to making stuff up? You get funnier all the time! :D
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner If LM was "dropping at a diagonal angle" and not landed verticaly, then where's the long trails alongs the surface? the last minute it landed verticaly, or do you believe NASA is liars and the original footage is BS? if the engine is powerful enough to kicking up dust while the LM is 100ft from the surface, then imagine what impact it should had make at touchdown - how many times must i repeat this for you? your nothing than an ignorant TROLL
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist, S H O W M E A C R A T E R ! ! ! !
Show me ANY crater from ANY vehicle in the universe! You can imagine a crater all you want, but if you want us to believe the LM would make a deep, beautiful, sharp-rimmed crater like something you saw in a Bugs Bunny cartoon, you have to show some kind of real example somewhere.......and apparently you can't. Hmmmm....wonder why.
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner I did gave you 2 examples: pixels and harrier! can you explain to me why there wasnt any long blasting trails alongs the surface after the LM? because it would had been if we choose to believe YOUR landing version.
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist 1) Pixel--not a crater
2) Harrier--you showed no photo
LunarTuner 9 months ago
@LunarTuner Hard to take you seriously your pathetic troll, you have done nothing but ignoring my questions
xismxist 9 months ago
Bart Sibel iz a jeenyus I thank he lykt my bruther wonse in Nashvil Tinisee Bart waz nice to me lyk an unkel
Hoaxslpper 1 year ago
Bart Sibrel, i guess the earth is flat huh?
HOPPERFZR 1 year ago
@HOPPERFZR I guess your head is empty huh.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 you must be one of those conspiracy theory idiots to
HOPPERFZR 1 year ago
@HOPPERFZR You must be one of those people that would believe NASA built a time machine and traveled through time if they told you that.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 i guess if you cant do it then it cant be done
HOPPERFZR 1 year ago
@HOPPERFZR Stupid guess. Example: A person can run 20mph. You can't I can't but yes it can be done.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
The NSA has done a great lobatomizing job on Americans
MisterMatthewRoberts 1 year ago
@MisterMatthewRoberts If you're going to accuse the entire country of being mentally deranged, at least spell lobotomy correctly.
schweppes1010 6 months ago
Where is Buzz Aldrin when you need him?Chrchrchr...I feel so sorry for Bart Sibrel...not!
stevehislop 1 year ago
tweekerhead, you are a dim-witted Pro-Apollo-Pimp touting the phony, tawdry wares of Nixon's diseased whore called Project Apollo! Being a half-wit, the CIA doesn't even pay pond-life like you to time-waste and clog up Apollo Fraud threads. I pity anyone afflicted with NASA's cock stuck in their mouths and having to swallow NASA's jiss for the rest of their lives.
Get swallowing! Force a grin and keep telling your fellow Apollo patsies that NASA's horse-dung jiss tastes real good!
sergemck 1 year ago
@sergemck
Again you forgot to take your pills!
weberblau 1 year ago
@sergemck ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!
timrocket2008 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Moon Landing A Fake or Fact part 1". Is this one of the films you guys were referring to?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago 3
Ok ... I stopped laffin' Damn...I never laffed' so hard in my life. I love you guys.
watch?v=1D4GIM2bEbg&feature=related
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This guy Tweekerhead seems to be trying to fill up page 1 to get all the hoax-believer posts out of the viewers sight. All we can do to thwart that tactic is to post the evidence often. Here's a link to some of the hoax evidence.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored 1 year ago
@Cosmored Yeah...here we ago again, another moron.
Go here:
watch?v=1D4GIM2bEbg&feature=related
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@christianroots
I'm not the one to tell anyone what to do with their block buttons...but, for christ's sake, if you ever needed proof that this guy was a low-class genus of Troll, then the last few posts he's slammed on your video is it!
Let him stay, you increase your hit count...But at what cost...
Do Not Feed The Trolls.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 What a Nimrod......hahahahahaha
You're a moron...go away.....hahahahahah
OMG you're makin' me laff' like bitch...pls. stop...I'm rollin' here...Thank you, I needed this. Great comedy act.....it's an act right? Oh shit ...I'm sorry, you really this stupid?
Sorry.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 You have an aversion for facts eh' Nimrod.
Keep the funny comin' stuff Hydrophobia, this is like my birthday.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Next time you shills wanna' open your mouth and say they couldn't land the Bedstead'/ Lunar Lander on Earth let alone on the Moon, better look at this vid' first before you open it and make a fool outta' yourselves.....like that ever stopped em' before.
watch?v=1D4GIM2bEbg&feature=related
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
"watch?v=1D4GIM2bEbg&feature=related"
I've already explained to you that the flying bedsted footage is very carefully EDITED NASA PROPAGANDA..
What part of that death trap contraption CRASHED, almost killing Armstrong, do you not understand ??? .. The "landing" footage was edited in later to make it look like that piece of shit could really fly, when it couldn't.
Good grief, but you're one gullible fool.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 "The "landing" footage was edited in later to make it look like that piece of shit could really fly, when it couldn't."
Oh come on now bro...It could fly...Just not for very long, and landing the damn thing, without wheels.....forget it!
You know that troll your engaging is another one of the despicable moron types right? He doesn't deserve another minute of your time bro! Not even for the mental gymnastics off his demented cerebellum!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 Still playin' yourself moron....hahahaha keep it comin' Nimrods ! Hohohohohoh heheheheh hahahahah . I can't stop laffin' Oh shit ...this is great!
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@straydog02 Bullshit...it's real get over it LOLOLOL Whata' Nimrod
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@straydog02 "Carefully edited" Hahahahahahah Hohohoho heheheh
Your makin' my night. S'better than Dice Clay......Please ..Please keep this shit comon....I love it ...Thx
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@straydog02 Gullible fool...heheheheh Yeah.
Ok let me stop laffin'...
Ok Nimrod, let's go with the shielding... If the LEM needed shielding to protect the Astronauts from radiation, what kind of radiation does it need to shield the inhabitants from? alpha,beta or gamma? Look it up on Wiki' if you need to.
This'll' be good.....
Be careful...this could be a trap, don't play yourself.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Did you know major solar flars were going on during all the apollo missions and the tin foil spacecraft they flew in wasn't designed to handle that kind of radiation or much of any kind for that matter? .You may want to look into these things a bit huh?
stalkervision 1 year ago
@stalkervision Good luck, I hope you find the truth you're looking for.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead thank you except the truth is already out there for people just willing to look at it.
stalkervision 1 year ago
All kidding aside, I hope you guys find the truth, that goes for me also.
Que tangas buenas suertes, picos de cabezas.
Bom sorte hilos de perros.
Ciao fratilis.
Pok me hone(s) ....lololol
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
If anyone ever doubted if they ever landed one of these, well watch this vid'
watch?v=1D4GIM2bEbg&feature=related
It was developed by Rolls Royce. The Hoaxtards forgot about the Harrier jet and how it was developed, it's a real thorn in their side.
But I guess to them the Harrier is fake to ..the British couldn't engineer this, they're to busy trying to save their bad teeth.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Owned
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
watch?v=1D4GIM2bEbg&feature=related
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
watch?v=1D4GIM2bEbg&feature=related
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Hey Stray, you see the desperate little troll vying for attention. These trolls are all the same. I guess his mommy doesn't give him much attention as he types his nonsense in her basement.
Wonder if these trolls are aware that the Dutch government found out their moonrock is a piece of petrified wood. How embarassing for those Apollo Fairy Tale believers out there!!!
It's so sad these trolls waste their time droning on instead of educating themselves about the true nature of space!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 Sorry unforgiven ..the Mom's basement line was mine, stop plagiarizing my one liners. You're not very creative are you.
BTW..You guys seem really sophomoric and silly when chime in here and insult people who disagree with your views. Are you really that insecure?
You're startin' to remind me of the comic book store owner guy on the Simpsons more the straydog. Do you own a comic book store also? hehehehe
Really I gotta stop, but this is so fun, like taunting a junkyard dog.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1
This troll doesn't have a freakin clue! .. Have you seen what he considers to be "proof" that Apollo happened as advertised? .. So far his "debate" consists of nothing but silly NASA propaganda videos.. and then he sez he's "spanking the hoax shills" .. This clown is TOO FUNNY !
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 I pick peanuts outta' my shit in the morning bigger than your brain shill boy. Next time you and Bart are at the drive-in makin' out, just think of all the dicks that have been in his mouth, and from what I've seen it's a pretty big mouth. I wish I could tell you closed minded idiots the truth, but then I'd have to find and kill you both. Please keep the funny typing comin', you're makin' my night.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
Thanks for proving what sick little freak you really are .. It's pretty amusing watching low life trash like you defend government scams like Apollo.
Too bad you're too much of a chicken shit to debate me .. It would have been fun proving what an ignorant little monkey you are .. Oh wait, you already proved that all by yourself.
L O L
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 IN YOUR OWN WORDS PROVE TO US ALL THE MOON LANDINGS WERE A HOAX......PROVE IT!
I'm not defending the government or NASA, your projecting again Dog.
Remember I was defending Aldrin, cuz' you were calling him a clown.
You're a clown, and you make me laugh ..allot!
I thank you. Why are you guys mad? Low IQ, flunked science and math, or just can't afford to move outta' Mom's basement?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
"I'm not defending the government or NASA, your projecting again Dog."
That should be "you're", not "your."
"You're a clown, and you make me laugh ..allot!"
That should be "a lot" .. Not only are you a piece of trash, but you're a simpleton.
"Why are you guys mad? Low IQ, flunked science and math, or just can't afford to move outta' Mom's basement?"
You're projecting again, Tweekerclown.
straydog02 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
I"N YOUR OWN WORDS PROVE TO US ALL THE MOON LANDINGS WERE A HOAX......PROVE IT!"
BART SIBREL ALREADY PROVED IT IN HIS INTERVIEWS WITH THE "ASTRONAUTS GONE WILD".. HE PROVED THOSE CLOWNS ARE LIARS WHO CAN'T GET THEIR ALLEGED MOON TRIP STORIES STRAIGHT.. THEIR LONG LIST OF CONTRADICTIONS TO EACH OTHER , PROVES THAT APOLLO WAS A SCAM.. SIBREL ALSO PROVED THAT WHEN CONFRONTED WITH THE HOAX EVIDENCE AND QUESTIONS THEY DON'T LIKE, THEY ALL RUN AWAY LIKE A PACK OF COWARDS.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 Nope, Sibrel proved nothing, just that he's a stalker tryin' to sell his crappy movie.
And about my spelling, as if I give a shit, you've FAILED again, you didn't notice I used up all my 500 characters, and in doing so, I had to contract and misspell some words.
The fact that you caught that "your" mistake proves how smart you are!
You really destroyed me with that one, you seem really intelligent, but then again you believe in the Moon landing hoax. Keep tryin' to prove it JR.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
Sorry to burst your little Apollo Fantasyland bubble, but Sibrel proved the Apollo astro-NOTS are lying cowards, who all run away whenever anyone questions them about their alleged moon trips.. None of them got their stories straight, so it looks like all that NASA debriefing and brainwashning was for nothing.
Nice try with trying to explain away why you can't spell either.. I just about spewed my coffee out laughing over that one!
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 Naa, Nope, Sibrel didn't prove a thing, and you didn't burst anyone's bubble. The facts just aren't there.THERE IN YOUR HEAD.
Do you guys realize that Kaysing with BA. in English is the only person in the hoaxtard camp. There's not one other person with a degree shouting and insulting Apollo believer. No PhD's , no one with any credentials.
So small time, PROVE IT IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Have you ever studied a Moon rock? Every country including Russia has em', 800lbs. brought back.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead ..
"Nope, Sibrel didn't prove a thing.."
Actually, Sibrel proved that the Apollo astronots are liars. None of them ever get their stories straight about what it was like to allegedly fly to, land on, and walk on the Moon. For instance, Cernan claimed that both he and Armstrong landed their LM's the exact same way, yet the A11 story sez that Neil shut off the LM engine AFTER he landed, while the A17 story claims that the LM engine was shut off BEFORE it landed.
Oops again.
straydog02 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
"Kaysing with BA. in English is the only person in the hoaxtard camp."
Of all the dumb apollogist claims, that has to be the dumbest one so far.
Kaysing was a ex Rocketdyne engineer .. He knew for a fact that the technology available during Apollo could have never gotten men safely to the Moon and back. Plus, Kaysing was only one of many educated researchers, some with PhDs, who've helped expose the Apollo scam.
You really don't have a clue what you're talking about.
straydog02 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
"So small time, PROVE IT IN YOUR OWN WORDS Have you ever studied a Moon rock? Every country including Russia has em', 800lbs. brought back."
I'm glad you brought this subject . The Apollo 11 fake petrified wood "rock" aside, nobody has ever seen all of the ALLEGED 840 lbs of Apollo "moon" rocks. NASA claims they are all locked away in in one of their armed guarded vaults but nobody has ever seen ALL 840 lbs. of the lunar rubble, so we only have their word for it . cont.
straydog02 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
cont.
A few small "moon" rocks are in museums, but they have never been tested by any scientist.. So the samples which have been studied are only the size of grains of rice, or tiny little slivers, or sand .. All of which could have been scooped up by unmanned missions.
Did you know that the properties of the Apollo "moon" rocks don't match that of the Soviet samples?
Oops again.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 Nope wrong again, 8oolbs.+ rocks all over the world, even Russia has em'.
Kaysing worked at Rocketdyne, from 56' to 63' BUT NOT AS AN ENGINEER! Kaysing was the company's head of technical publications but was not trained as an engineer or scientist. FACT.
Well, there's another stupid lie debunk. Owned......Next Please
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
Nope, wrong again .. The Russians haven't seen the alleged 800+ lbs of moon rocks either, but the Dutch have seen one wooden one!
Kaysing was both head of technical publcations and also an ENGINEER.. If you had a clue what you were talking about, you would know that FACT! .. Instead you just parrot typical NASA propaganda like a good little brainwashed troll.
Well, there's another apollogist troll LIE debunked ... Owned ... Next.
What other apollogist BS you got?
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02Wrong..... If you had a clue what you were talking about, you would know that FACT! .. Instead you just parrot typical Hoaxtard' propaganda like a good little brainwashed troll.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@straydog02 Wrong again, you fail your homework, go back and do it right.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@straydog02 Oh Gawd ...Keep on clambering !!! hahahahahahah
I can't laffin' at ya' all.......Thx.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
Here ya go, Tweeker.. Learn something besides the apollogist BS you continue to parrot here.
Bill Kaysing The Service Engineer
watch?v=oyzlZkTwYRo
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 Nope ..just an English major....You got played, and now you're playin' yourself.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead .. You've seen the PROOF that Bill Kaysing was an ENGINEER and yet you still pretend that he was "just an English major'
It never ceases to amaze me how DISHONEST and DELUSIONAL you apollogist freaks really are.
straydog02 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@straydog02 Mr. Kaysing received his Bachelor of Arts in English in 1949 from the University of Southern California. Those are his academic credentials. He worked for Rocketdyne chiefly as a writer and a librarian.
I have found a film of him at Rocketdyne circa 61'.
watch?v=3bS32-6jMXw
I believe it is absolutely 100% real.
I wonder why NASA didn't kill him for being such a thorn in their side?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago 3
@Tweekerhead
"I wonder why NASA didn't kill him for being such a thorn in their side?"
For the simple reason that CHARACTER ASSASSINATION was enough .. You're the brainwashed poster child propagandist proof of that fact.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 ... can you imagine one of these Nots taking a polygraph? theyd soil their Depends.
pt1gard 1 year ago
@pt1gard
After all the "debriefing" , my guess is maybe a few of those brainwashed Apollo fly boys might pass a poly .. Well, at least the ones who really believe they went to the Moon anyway, like Buzz the Clown... Mr. Armstrong never was comfortable about being forced to lie for NASA though .. At least you have to admire him for that and also for not wanting to take credit for something he didn't do.
To quoite Neil; "I'don't deserve it, NASA just placed me in that ROLE."
Yep.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 ... would be interesting if these washer and dryer tumbled brains would hold up to a sodium pentothal
pt1gard 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead and apparently that shit comes directly from your head you complete loser. What a two year old you are.
stalkervision 1 year ago
@stalkervision Really, because I disagree with your inane position ? Good for you flunky.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead No INANE is you pal. Your postings are completely Juvenile to say the least.
stalkervision 1 year ago
@stalkervision Yeah some of em' are, it's called transference, I'm trying to make a point, how you hoaxtards start chiming in as you are, and insulting people for what they believe. This isn't spreading knowledge or related to science in anyway, You guys are just clambering for attention, and want you and the world to see how smart you are without do any work or research.
How many hoaxtards does it take to change a light bulb?
10...one to change it and 9 to say they could've done it better.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead "trying to make a point" That's a good one. Starting by talking about feces I suppose? The people who have done FAR more of the insulting over the years are the apollo moonbat clan. You start by insulting people what can you expect back? Then an insult at the end of your post of course. You proved MY POINT for me.
stalkervision 1 year ago
@stalkervision I posted this weeks ago "I bet Sirel did pretty well with his crusade, probably got a little cash put away."
And then I have this kid tellin' me I should get my facts right before I chime in.
You guys are like junkyard dogs, guarding your master's junk, and that's all it is...junk.
You believe what you wanna' believe, I'll believe what I wanna' believe
Why do you hoaxers' need to insult and scream at people, are you really that insecure ?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead I don't believe anyone got rich off of any of this tweeter because if they had you would have never let them live it down. You talk about insults? LMAO It's the pot calling the kettle back.
stalkervision 1 year ago
@stalkervision yeah...whatever Sparky, I enjoyed spanking you guys, you guys haven't produced one piece of evidence or one fact to prove let alone create a doubt to support your position, but hey, science isn't on your side.
Dx = ½ a t2 And you're ascending and descending the Moon And all ya' need is this then...
vp = SQRT ( ( 2 GM Rp) / ( Rp( Ra + Rp ) ) )
And you're orbiting the Moon
We're done here.
Owned ...next.....
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead I am sure you do in your day time delusions. Owned? LMAO. You owned yourself pal with your firs