So let me get this straight..if you were to run for office..and your friends donated money to your campaign..and you looked at all the personal donations of your friends..would they all have donated to the same causes you did? Isnt it myopic to say you only have friends that have the same political, social and economic as you do?
Okay there's a difference between "coward" and "realist". I'm gonna stop bothering arguing with you, since there's no point arguing logic with a jingoist buzzwords.
Okay I have a feeling I'm not going to get through to you here. Even if America doesn't lose, it'll be still be catastrophic and make it much harder to win. You don't seem to be able grasp global affairs too much. Nuking Mecca will be an act of war. Even by American standards, that would be crossing the line in terms of foreign policy. Nuking Mecca for Al Qaeda is akin to nuking the Ganges River and killing a bunch of cows because of the Tamil Tigers.
Okay. You don't seem to understand. Not all Muslims are on Al Qaeda's side. A substantial portion think 9/11 was a despicable act. If you nuke Mecca, not only will it be an act of war on a much-needed ally in the Middle East, but nuking Mecca will give Al Qaeda a few hundred million more operatives. Not to mention most of the countries we get our oil from are Muslim nations. It'd be catastrophic.
Lol I'm American. I have an American father, I've been to America, I have an American family. I do not support terrorists. I'm simply stating the obvious reality here that if you nuke Mecca, which is in a country which is currently allied with America, there will be a major shitstorm. Every Muslim who's undecided will be immediately on the terrorist's side. 1.3 billion Muslims in the world by the way. (cont)
I support the invasion of Afghanistan and even though the Iraq war was badly handled, I supported Saddam being toppled. So don't start saying I support terrorists. If Osama was in an electric chair, I'd pull the lever. No sweat.
Can you comment on this article from INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY? ht tp://w ww.ibdeditorials. com/ IBDArticles .aspx?id=268874251390676 ... 'Seventh-graders at a San Francisco-area school were required, even after 9/11, to "become Muslims" for two full weeks as part of California's world history curriculum. This included reciting the Muslim profession of faith — "Allah is the only true God and Muhammad is his messenger" — and chanting "Praise be to Allah" in response to teacher prompts.'
lol Islam isn't a monolithic movement. We have allies in Islam like Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey, Albania, the government of Pakistan (The people don't like us), Iraq and Afghanistan. All because all our enemies at the moment are Muslim doesn't mean all Muslims are our enemies. If we nuke Mecca, instantly, all Muslims are our enemies and will find a reason to justifiably wage jihad against us. This would not be in our interests.
with so many people undocumented (arriving illegally or overstaying visas) why isn't the security at home seemingly considered less important than securing Iraq? what's the point of fighting extremism there when we're doing little to stop it from arriving and growing here at home?
That was a minority considering HOW MANY MUSLIMS THERE ARE IN THE WORLD. You know what countries are majority Muslim? Look it up on Wikipedia. This includes staunch NATO ally Turkey and that country that cheered for Bush when he visited in Albania. And again as I mentioned before, the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan are run by Muslims so imagine how much worse that'd make the Iraq War for us.
You're focusing on me mentioning Jerusalem and not my actual question. Even if he didn't take out Jerusalem too, he'd piss off 1.3 billion people by taking out Mecca. Every single Muslim IN THE WORLD would be against us. Right there, instantly our enemies. And just so you know, 6 billion is the current world population. So it's kind of a lot of people =).
He said taking out Muslim holy sites. One of them is Jerusalem. He didn't specifically mention Mecca. And even then that doesn't negate the rest of my argument that it'd piss off approximately 1.3 billion people.
I heard you got a "mental health" differment from serving in Vietnam. Do you plan to release what "mental health" issues you supposedly had to avoid the Vietnam draft?
My question, involves your hypothetical scenario where if Al Qaeda did another terrorist attack on America. You said you'd take out Muslim holy sites. My question is this - how exactly will this get moderate Muslims on our side? There are 1.3 billion Muslims in the world. (cont)
Right now, I would say a very small minority are actually commiting Jihad against you. If you took out Muslim holy sites, which to the best of my knowledge are all located in Friendly countries (Saudi Arabia and Israel), not only would every Muslim-majority in existence become our enemies (If you think they're all enemies of us already you're disturbingly ignorant), every single Muslim would take up a holy war against you. (cont)
A lot of Muslims don't consider our actions justifiable to wage jihad against us... yet. This would also include the newly-installed governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, since they're run by Muslims, so fighting in the Iraq War will be that much harder. Also, Jerusalem is a Muslim holy site. (cont)
My question is how difficult is it going to be to pass employer verification of SS number and ID for all new employees? It's very popular in every poll on the subject yet Congress won't pass it unless verification is linked to amnesty!
Will you go on Michael Savages show, and get thrown some hard questions. I don't like slow pitch softball myself. Keep up the fight for Americans Tancredo. You keep sticking to your guns, and I'll vote for you. That is if you go on Michael Savage's "The Savage Nation".
He's been on Savage's show several times in the past. Savage seems to be ignoring him lately. He calls him "unelectable".Savage was high on Romney until he found out Romney has no spine on gay marriage.Savage knows there is no quality "top tier" candidate out there. Hopefully he'll endorse Tom.
I haven't heard him on here since Feb or MArch. whenever Tom announced.Savage seems uninterested in his show now. He hints a lot at quitting. He seems nutty by claiming sole credit for the defeat of this Amnesty bill. I thik it wouold have happened without him. He helped no doubt, but he didn't provide me the same resources as Numbers USa.
So let me get this straight..if you were to run for office..and your friends donated money to your campaign..and you looked at all the personal donations of your friends..would they all have donated to the same causes you did? Isnt it myopic to say you only have friends that have the same political, social and economic as you do?
tillman40 4 years ago
Everyone on the channel called you stupid and just one look at your grammar verifies this.
atheistcapitalist 4 years ago
lol jingoist.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
Okay there's a difference between "coward" and "realist". I'm gonna stop bothering arguing with you, since there's no point arguing logic with a jingoist buzzwords.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
Okay I have a feeling I'm not going to get through to you here. Even if America doesn't lose, it'll be still be catastrophic and make it much harder to win. You don't seem to be able grasp global affairs too much. Nuking Mecca will be an act of war. Even by American standards, that would be crossing the line in terms of foreign policy. Nuking Mecca for Al Qaeda is akin to nuking the Ganges River and killing a bunch of cows because of the Tamil Tigers.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
Okay. You don't seem to understand. Not all Muslims are on Al Qaeda's side. A substantial portion think 9/11 was a despicable act. If you nuke Mecca, not only will it be an act of war on a much-needed ally in the Middle East, but nuking Mecca will give Al Qaeda a few hundred million more operatives. Not to mention most of the countries we get our oil from are Muslim nations. It'd be catastrophic.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
Lol I'm American. I have an American father, I've been to America, I have an American family. I do not support terrorists. I'm simply stating the obvious reality here that if you nuke Mecca, which is in a country which is currently allied with America, there will be a major shitstorm. Every Muslim who's undecided will be immediately on the terrorist's side. 1.3 billion Muslims in the world by the way. (cont)
mcteethinator 4 years ago
I support the invasion of Afghanistan and even though the Iraq war was badly handled, I supported Saddam being toppled. So don't start saying I support terrorists. If Osama was in an electric chair, I'd pull the lever. No sweat.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
Can you comment on this article from INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY? ht tp://w ww.ibdeditorials. com/ IBDArticles .aspx?id=268874251390676 ... 'Seventh-graders at a San Francisco-area school were required, even after 9/11, to "become Muslims" for two full weeks as part of California's world history curriculum. This included reciting the Muslim profession of faith — "Allah is the only true God and Muhammad is his messenger" — and chanting "Praise be to Allah" in response to teacher prompts.'
theonlywoj 4 years ago
lol Islam isn't a monolithic movement. We have allies in Islam like Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey, Albania, the government of Pakistan (The people don't like us), Iraq and Afghanistan. All because all our enemies at the moment are Muslim doesn't mean all Muslims are our enemies. If we nuke Mecca, instantly, all Muslims are our enemies and will find a reason to justifiably wage jihad against us. This would not be in our interests.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
with so many people undocumented (arriving illegally or overstaying visas) why isn't the security at home seemingly considered less important than securing Iraq? what's the point of fighting extremism there when we're doing little to stop it from arriving and growing here at home?
theonlywoj 4 years ago
That was a minority considering HOW MANY MUSLIMS THERE ARE IN THE WORLD. You know what countries are majority Muslim? Look it up on Wikipedia. This includes staunch NATO ally Turkey and that country that cheered for Bush when he visited in Albania. And again as I mentioned before, the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan are run by Muslims so imagine how much worse that'd make the Iraq War for us.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
You're focusing on me mentioning Jerusalem and not my actual question. Even if he didn't take out Jerusalem too, he'd piss off 1.3 billion people by taking out Mecca. Every single Muslim IN THE WORLD would be against us. Right there, instantly our enemies. And just so you know, 6 billion is the current world population. So it's kind of a lot of people =).
mcteethinator 4 years ago
He said taking out Muslim holy sites. One of them is Jerusalem. He didn't specifically mention Mecca. And even then that doesn't negate the rest of my argument that it'd piss off approximately 1.3 billion people.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
I heard you got a "mental health" differment from serving in Vietnam. Do you plan to release what "mental health" issues you supposedly had to avoid the Vietnam draft?
OptDiscounts 4 years ago
markeyboy123:
Can't get these grades being one issue:
American Conservative Union A+
National Right to Life Committee A
National Rifle Association A
Family Research Council A
National Taxpayers Union A
Americans for Better Immigration A+
National Federation of
Independent Business A+
DirtDiggerMan 4 years ago
My question, involves your hypothetical scenario where if Al Qaeda did another terrorist attack on America. You said you'd take out Muslim holy sites. My question is this - how exactly will this get moderate Muslims on our side? There are 1.3 billion Muslims in the world. (cont)
mcteethinator 4 years ago
Right now, I would say a very small minority are actually commiting Jihad against you. If you took out Muslim holy sites, which to the best of my knowledge are all located in Friendly countries (Saudi Arabia and Israel), not only would every Muslim-majority in existence become our enemies (If you think they're all enemies of us already you're disturbingly ignorant), every single Muslim would take up a holy war against you. (cont)
mcteethinator 4 years ago
A lot of Muslims don't consider our actions justifiable to wage jihad against us... yet. This would also include the newly-installed governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, since they're run by Muslims, so fighting in the Iraq War will be that much harder. Also, Jerusalem is a Muslim holy site. (cont)
mcteethinator 4 years ago
If you "took out" Jerusalem, you'd be making quite a number of Christian and Jewish enemies as well.
Interested in hearing your interpretation on how taking out Muslim holy sites will benefit US interests exactly.
mcteethinator 4 years ago
Mr. Tancredo
My question
Instead of focusing on Illegal immigrants and emigrants why not try and get a bill passed that goes after employers only?
American8298 4 years ago
My question is how difficult is it going to be to pass employer verification of SS number and ID for all new employees? It's very popular in every poll on the subject yet Congress won't pass it unless verification is linked to amnesty!
NO2amnesty 4 years ago
Will you go on Michael Savages show, and get thrown some hard questions. I don't like slow pitch softball myself. Keep up the fight for Americans Tancredo. You keep sticking to your guns, and I'll vote for you. That is if you go on Michael Savage's "The Savage Nation".
ezekiel316 4 years ago
He's been on Savage's show several times in the past. Savage seems to be ignoring him lately. He calls him "unelectable".Savage was high on Romney until he found out Romney has no spine on gay marriage.Savage knows there is no quality "top tier" candidate out there. Hopefully he'll endorse Tom.
hooligan2005 4 years ago
In the past meaning since he started running for president? They are probably all just Illumanati Freemasons anyway.
ezekiel316 4 years ago
I haven't heard him on here since Feb or MArch. whenever Tom announced.Savage seems uninterested in his show now. He hints a lot at quitting. He seems nutty by claiming sole credit for the defeat of this Amnesty bill. I thik it wouold have happened without him. He helped no doubt, but he didn't provide me the same resources as Numbers USa.
hooligan2005 4 years ago