i think alot of people are forgetting senna at monaco in 84, and suzuka in 88 or 89 i cant remember...also when people say that his car had electronic aids in the donington gp of 93 you have to remember that he was also using slick tyres, whereas everyone else had wets and the cars at the front all had electronic aids which put them essentially on an even playing field
@bradleyblackster man..did Senna really have slicks? I don´t know if it´s true but that would be awesome to know! still I´m not sure, it was too wet for slicks..
- The master of rain goes by another name, your name is SENNA. They want to talk about the difficulty of running with car without electronic help, remember the second race in F1 and Senna his first F1 victory. Among other races in the rain he gave a concert. ;)
Frankly speaking Villeneuve and Senna did have more swagger than schumi (in todays era Hamilton resembles that) but if you're gonna judge a driver by the stats you really have only one option.
Senna was great in rain and so too Schumi but imho fisichella staying put in that 2004 brazilian grand prix in a jordan while all bigwigs crashed out was a great scene.
fuck everyone commenting about senna, it's ridiculous how people can't get over the past and recognize the great drivers of today. no disrespect to senna though, just to the people constantly commenting about him.
@mikidof The reason people still talk about Senna today is because he was one of the all time greatest drivers in F1 history. senna is to F1 what Muhammed Ali is to Boxing, Pele to football, Shane Warne to cricket etc etc. That's why people still talk about him.
everyone conparing this to senna in 93 and saying chumi is better because of no driver aids... everyone had no aids so in the wet, car control shined through even more which means schumis emphatic win looks alot better than if it would of been with traction control ect.
@l0dgey Agree with that. Also, the debate between who was better between Schumi & Senna will rage on forever. 1 thing can not be disputed though. Nobody could touch either of them in the rain.
All Hamilton percetanges are BS. Wait for him to get a more few years on F1 and see all his stats drop. The fact he started in McLaren helped him a lot, all the good drivers in f1 have started with a crappy team, but not Hamilton.
@felipemuve It's not really fair to pass judgement based on the fact that Hamilton started at mcLaren. Also, what you're saying isn't strictly true. Jim Clark, another all time great, started at Lotus when they were at the height of their powers yet nobody levels the same criticism at him. Also, if we are discounting a sportsman's achievments because they started at a top team then does that mean the football careers of Giggs, Scholes, G.Neville & Beckham should also be overlooked
I remember this race, it was an excellent drive by Schumi without question. To people claiming that Schumi is the "rain master" are incorrect, the real "rain master" is Senna - he won 60% of the wet races he competed in and Schumi 40%. Hamilton actually has a better wet record then Schumi now which drops him to 3rd place. Yes Schumi is a great wet weather driver, but not the best. BTW even Schumi himself claims Ayrton is the greatest.
@F1TomM It's on the Top Gear tribute to Senna - It's at 2:38 but watch from 2:20 to see the other drivers have thier say........ You may as well watch the whole thing it's a good tribute.
@F1TomM If the "statisical" greatest driver claims Senna is the "greatest" that has to count for a massive chunk. I got big respect for Schumi saying that.
@izybluffen Agreed, it should also be remembered how much of an impoact that Senna had upon Schumacher's career. Despite the fact that Schumi & Senna had their differences in 92&93 Schumacher's admiration of Senna is well documented and Schumacher's attention to detail with the car & fitness also owes a lot (although not 100%) to what he saw Senna doing at the time. There's a great book call Schumacher:The Edge of Greatness by James Allen that gives a great insight into this
@izybluffen schumacher stated when he was at his prime that he dosent want to be treated specially. he said in my opinion im just able to drive cars round a race track faster and better than everyone else. and i love it when all schumacher haters actually really respect his opinion when it comes to senna. and you can honestly get stuffed saying hamilton is a better driver in the wet. hes just got a higher ratio because he aint bin here as long.SCHUMSCHER IS THE BEST END OF!!!!!!!!!
everyone say senna is the best because he died at his best. the story could be different if michael die in 2004, everyone will praise that schumacher is the best
seems some people made rule like this --> "racer who died at his/her best is the best of all time"
and people doesnt take a look on struggling character like prost, mansell, and schumacher which they dont die on their golden era
Senna won in Donninton 93 in the rain with a car full of electronic aids, while Schumacher had not any electronic aid. Even Michael Andretti in that Mclaren overtook Schumi! That was a joke!!!
But in Barcelona 92 in the rain, both drove with no traction controls, and Senna could not be as fast as Schumacher and finally Senna crashed trying to catch Schumi. First victory of Schumacher, Spa 92, and there was rain, beating Mansell, Senna... everyone !
1) On route to his famous Donington win Senna mugged Schumacher and left him trailing in his wake despite the fact that Schumacher's Benneton was a superior car.
2) The McLaren that Senna was driving was one of the worst cars McLaren have built in the last 25 years. To win in the manner that he did was world class.
3) I can't believe a Schumi fan is making a point about driving aids after Schumi & Beneton's cheating throughout 94.
@chrismarkbicknell you my friend know nothing. proof is 1993 benneton were crap. senna had a better car but schumacher still beat him. more proof is 1992 spa. thats when senna started getting jelouse of schumacher and then when schumacher finally eclipsed him in 1994 he made up a stupid story that he had electronic aids because senna kept crashing but schumacher had perfect car controle. you and your other stupid senna fans make up crap to blacken schumis name. shumis the best
@bourlivak88 Wrong, Benneton were found gulty of having electronic aids within their software and fined heavily. Ross Brawn would later admit that the TCS & Launch Control could be activated by using a laptop. It turns out that Senna's hunch about the Benneton team was correct. This would later be confirmed by Schumacher's team mate Verstappen.. Also, I don't appreciate the childish insult in your opening remark.
@hunt2727 When the track's wet electronic aids are pretty much useless. However, I do agree that Schumacher was awesome in Spa 92. I think it's impossible to say who was the better wet weather driver between the 2. There is no doubt that they were both untouchable in the rain. Why do i prefer Senna to Schumacher? Senna's style. Pure & simple. Put it this way, which football team would you prefer to watch Barcelona or Real Madrid, Which boxer Rocky Marciano or Muhammed Ali???
Senna in donninton 93 was good with those traction controls...
But even a bad driver as Michael andretti in that Mclaren was very very fast, and he even overtook Schumacher in the wet!!! (before crashing so bad he was...)
wow! those traction controls that Senna had were very good!
But both with no traction controls, barcelona 92, and Senna crashed trying to be as fast as Schumacher!! First Victory of schumacher: Spa 92 with rain, beating Senna, Mansell...
I totally agree with you. When I saw what happened In Canada this year I was honestly asking myself, "Why are they stopping the race?" It's a joke now
@jotakh Dude, again: I'm not comparing them. There is no such need and no point at all in this discussion. If you think Senna is way better, good for you then. Some think Schumacher is better. Good for them. I have no respect for crazy fans seeking for a SxS discussion. I'm a fan of racing, and when I turn on the TV I hope I can see a performance like this one here, or Donington 93, or Barrichello/Silverstone/03 and so it goes. If you care so much for this SxS discussion then you're not a F1 fan
TILL TODAY........SCHUMI STILL THE WET RACE MASTER(RAIN KING)......EVEN THE LATEST GRAND PRIX IN CANADA 2011......HE PROVED AGAIN EVEN HE NEVER WIN THE RACE.....BRAVO SCHUMI
@wenzeslaus Leider haben sich meine Fremdschämenqualitätien in beinah 20 jahren nicht wirklich verbessert. Sobald ich den Kai sehe geht mein finger automatisch richtung stummtaste.
Was Sky betrifft, kann ich auch nicht sagen ob die besseres personal in der boxengasse haben.
People who say Schumacher isnt good are DUMB. Dumbest people. And always trying to compare with Senna. At Senna's time Schumi was awesome in a Benetton too.. Lets see what Hamilton or Alonso does when they gets as old as Schumi..... Tired of these stupid YT comments
@jotakh Lol you deleted your comment.. First of all who cares about you getting tireds about my comments.. i dont even know you fuck off.. And where did AI say Benettom????????? see my previous comment.. Get some glasses.. One thing Schumi fans know Senna fans are arrogant and not decent at all.. One thing they should learn from Schumi.. Always a gentleman.. Ayrton never was a gentleman but very agressive with his beahviousr everywhere..
@FERRARIAVI Agreed. Even though I am more of a Senna and Mansell fan I can never understand the people on here who dismiss 1 because they are a fan of the other. Schumacher is 1 of the greatest natural talents we have seen in the sport. However, even the most ardent Schumi fan can not get away from the fact that he will always have question marks against his sportsmanship.
Really love watching wet races like this back then. These days I have to pray they don't keep the safety car out too long each time it rains. Last year's Korean GP is a good example why, the safety car was out for way longer than it had to.
I think everybody remember the praised Senna's driving in Donington 1993. But the performance shown in here is just as incredible (Although not as much mentioned). Schumacher humiliated everyone else in this GP. A true highlight in his career.
@hlidskjalf666 Sorry, but I guess you read some bad information. Williams Renault had the traction control and active suspension, Senna was struggling in an underpowered Mclaren.
you´re not sorry, I am....because you are a maniac!
the McLaren MP4/8 designed by Neil Oatley around advanced racecar technology, including a semi-automatic transmission, active suspension and traction control systems.
Williams/Renault ? Yea so, Michael drove Benetton xD. fail
And ffs check facts before even try reply next time. its all there (wiki)
@hlidskjalf666 I "guess" you are a troll, but as said, a lot of cars had TC in 1993, including Benneton and Williams. Besides, Williams had enormous superiority for the whole season. Either way, please understand I'm not comparing Senna and Schumacher. I just said this performance shown here is awesome.
Cette course restera la plus belle de toutes les courses de Schumacher... Alors que beaucoup de pilotes pensaient être les meilleurs sur piste mouillée
F1 Racing (magazine of the largest automotive genre) 29/12/2006: Ayrton Senna was named the fastest rider of all time in Formula 1. In an article published in the British magazine F1 Racing, "the Brazilian overcame again the seven times champion Michael Schumacher, who came in second.
Lewis Hamilton: Schumacher has been phenomenal. But Senna was the best.
If those who live there and really understands F1 says so, who are we to oppose them, is not it?!
Bernie Ecclestone (Formula 1 boss) 07/05/2008: "Senna was the best of all time"
Fittipaldi 22/10/206: "Senna was better than Schumacher." Alonso will be champion BI-upon Schumy. "
Flavio Briatore (Renault boss) 01/18/2008: The only extra-regarded by the Italian sprinter was a triple world champion Ayrton Senna, named as the Maradona of the tracks. Seven times champion Michael Schumacher would be between Alonso and Senna, one of Marco Van Basten
DAS waren noch Zeiten!!!! Die F1 noch 1000ps, Schumacher bekannt als unbesiegbare Maschine, RTL noch kein totaler Schwachsinn...herrlich xD
Ich habe Schumi geliebt, ihn das erste Mal fahren sehen, da war ich 4 Jahre alt, war Autofan, bin mit ihm aufgewachsen, habe ihn bewundert...und geweint als er aufgehört hat!
Saw this years back live on TV...If I remember properly, he annihilated all of them and finished with over a minute and a half after 2 or 3 pit-stops...epic driving
Schunacher its a terrible driver! Only won because had the teammates to help him! that's why he will be forever behind Senna (true driver), Fanggio and Prost.
Schumacher and Alonso was the worse thing that happened to F1.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Schunacher its a terrible driver! Only won because had the teammates to help him! that's why he will be forever behind Senna (true driver), Fanggio and Prost.
Schumacher and Alonso was the worse thing that happened to F1.
Senna in donninton 93 was good with those traction controls...
but even a bad driver as Michael andretti in that Mclaren was very very fast, and he even overtook Schumacher in the wet!!! (before crashing so bad he was...)
wow! that traction controls that Senna had were very very good!!
But Senna in barcelona 92 without traction controls crashed trying to be as fast as Schumacher!!
@hunt2727 aha what about monaco 1984, ever heard of Tolmann? no? lets say its like the modern equal of Hispania racing TEAM, hmmm 2nd at Monaco '84 Senna
and Lets Remember not active suspension or TC, Semi-auto gearbox,
just one big Turbo! giving lots of power in one big kick!!! just what you need in the rain. oh by the way who els was driving that day in 84 Prost Mansell Lauda Arnoux Rosberg Patrese Piquet.Wait that 4 World champs in that Year. how many in 1996?
i9 miss the old mika hakkinen vs michael schumacher times ^^ real fights on the limit of theyre cars. hit the break as late as possible... and fuk fia with theyre new bullsh1t rules...
It wasn't just that the Ferrari was slow (well, it wasn't SLOW, the engine still had some power in a straight line) it just handled poorly and yet Michael did amazing things with it. What is more impressive, in my mind, was his second place at Brazil where the revolutionary new titanium casing gearbox was replaced with the old rear-end of the 1995 car (originally designed for a V12) causing it to handle horribly. Pouring down rain and he managed second!
I remember this race. It was his first victory as Ferrari driver. The 96 car was pretty awful, yet on that day, Shumi´s fastest lap of the race was 4 seconds faster than anyone else. A magic day
@stevenmcg69 in season of 1993, Schumacher says at Silverstone:" The Benetton is better what Mclaren"...93= 5 wins for Senna. 1 for MS ( Senna retired because engine problems).
in 1994 ms beat senna in every race up till that very sad moment in imola this will always be a case off i say you say but sadly we will never no. the world was robbed off what would have been an epic battle between the 2 .
Crap. In Senna's 5 wins, 2 were inherited from misfortune of Alain Prost and Michael Schumacher. And Michael Schumacher should have won the monaco gp of 93. Also at the end of 1993 in the last 3 races he had the best car. Even shit Michael Andretti was doing well in it and so was Hakkinen. That puts Schumi at 2 wins to Senna's 3 wins but in Schumacher's only second year in Formula 1 with an unreliable car compared to Senna's 10 years of experience . OWNED.
@stevenmcg69 In the beginning of 1994 MS was using illegal fuel. Moreover Senna had problems owing to the size of the cockpit, consequence of a wrong design (the problem the tried to solve at Imola 94 by cutting and welding the steering column). This is the reason why SENNA did not win the first 3 races in 1994. But if you consider that Hill was to be champion at the end of 1994, you clearly see that Senna would have beaten MS for sure
@stevenmcg69, Unfortunately MSC who compares with Senna Senna should never have seen fly, I followed all the career of Ayrton Senna and can say that near Senna MSC was just a good driver, nothing more than this amount of bonds far from an accredit comparing these two great drivers, Senna is unsurpassed.
@sandrorhoads Michael is a GOD, shut up with Senna. 7 World Champion titels. In the time at 2000 he had clearly the inferior car. And he kicked them in her arses, so he is the best of all time. Remember Barichello and Irvine, they had the same car like Michael..... and where they are......... They were crap...!!!
@sandrorhoads so are you suggesting that it must have been jesus in that car instead of shumi. and im pretty sure simply the best was on shumis pit board when he won the 2003 world championship:P
Senna won three F1 titles with TECHNICALLY DOMINANT CARS THAT WERE ALREADY RACE WINNERS BEFORE SENNA JOINED THE TEAM.
Schumi NEVER joined a winning team, converting a no-name brand like Benetton to a double world champion. In 1996, Schumi joined Ferrari which was the ridicule of F1 at the time, and when MSC won his first Ferrari title in 2000, it was the first drivers title in 21 years. HOMO Senna died childless and some of you inserted their soft peckers into Senna's COLON VAGINA (asshole)
Bei diesen Bedingungen hat sich immer gezeigt, wer der WAHRE Weltmeister war, Hill, Villeneuve und Häkkinen waren im Regen NIE in der Lage einen Schumacher das Wasser reichen!
Einen gab es, der Schumacher das Leben hätte schwer machen können, AYRTON SENNA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@maconhadalata: You must be a butt-fucking illiterate SPIC BOY, and I would like to keep you around my pharmaceutical laboratory as a FUCKING LATINO SLAVE. You were born to serve your WHITE and SUPERIOR ACADEMIC MASTERS. Briatore is a FUCKING SCUMBAG CHEATER, WHILE THE GREATEST CHAMPION OF ALL TIMES---MICHAEL SCHUMACHER---NEVER HAD ANY REASON TO CHEAT ON ACCOUNT OF HIS SUPERIOR DRIVING.
M. Schumacher maintains a staff of LATINO SLAVES at his superior mansion outside of Lake Geneva. FUCK YOU!!!
TheDRANALYSIS111 se ve que no eres un seguidor de la formula 1 como tu vas a decir esas cosas de ayrton senna es verdad q shumi es el mejor piloto de la historia pero senna no c queda atras y para mi es uno de los mejores de todos los tiempos y te apuesto que si senna no hubiera muerto a shumi se le viera echo dificil conseguir todos esos logros que hasta ahora se ve dificil de romper
Claro que SI, el DR ANALYSIS es un seguidor de la Formula Uno. Pero no estoy dispuesto de exagerar los hechos de Senna, quien era un buen piloto POR UNA SOLA VUELTA, pero Senna era un piloto MUY MEDIOCRE EN EL TRANSCURSO DE UNA CARRERA (90 min.). Senna era un PRINCIPE DE LA MEDIOCRIDAD, convertiendo 65 pole posiciones en solo 41 victorias, mientras de que Schumacher convertio 68 pole posiciones en 91 VICTORIAS, con mas de 70 vueltas mas rapidas de la carrera (Senna tenia solo 19). KEEP IT REAL!
crei q no sabias de formula 1 pero ya veo q eres un seguidor . creo q se te olvido q senna tiene sus 41 victorias y 65 poles en 162 grandes premios .Mientras q shumi logro sus records con 250 grandes premios te lo aseguro q de no morir senna los numeros de ambos pilotos fueran diferentes pero shumi es el mejor de la historia aunque para mi el mejor piloto en la actualidad es kimi
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheDRANALYSIS111 Schumacher never conquerer pole against Senna. Scumacher only conquerer pole with best car in grid.Schumacher 68 pole in 7 seasons with best car(Benetton 94,95) Ferrari 2000,01,02,03,04....Senna 61 pole, 2 seasons in best car (Mclaren 88,89).
Who is interested in pole? Senna took every pole and Prost won the championship. With all the rule changes pole was even less important. Without petrol Schumacher would have had much more poles. Tactics and how much fuel u took with u was more important.
@TheDRANALYSIS111 Sign my think...1988 in 16 gp Senna 13 poles against Team mate Prost..in 1993 16 gp, Prost 13 Poles against Hill...in 1994 so hard to Schumacher defeated Hill cheating..
@guigo00018: Senna pudo mostrar su "talento" solo con coches que fueron tecnicamente SUPERIOR...pero Schumacher gano titulos en la Formula Uno con coches INFERIORES. En la lluvia Senna era bien cuando tenia coches con CONTROL DE TRACCION....pero Schumacher controlo el Ferrari de 1996 SIN CONTROL DE TRACCION. SENNA ERA UN MUCHACHO MEDIOCRE DEL TERCER MUNDO....Y TU ERES UN TRIPLE HIJO DE PUTA, ASI COMO EL MEDIOCRE Y MUERTO SENNA!!!!
@TheDRANALYSIS111 Thanks for your words....we are the third world.....however we are the best......third world wins of "first world".......in sports most populars like f1 and soccer.....brazil rullezzz...the best driver: senna....the best player: Pelé all this with pure talent.....and no investiments...no money...
You are not educated....respect this people who to rest....we discuting f1...but like Schumacher...you not respect all others...Drivers are peoples...Drivers not numbers....its f1 is only sport
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheDRANALYSIS111 in 1985 Ayrton Senna = 16 Gp, in medium car (Lotus) 7 poles against top cars Prost/Lauda (Mclaren), Mansell/Rosberg (Williams) and Piquet (Brabham)...7 poles against 4,3,1,1,3 World Champions...in medium car....Schumacher never start in pole while Senna alive....Schumacher only pole after Senna dead against???? nobody....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheDRANALYSIS111 1986 Ayrton Senna in medium car (Lotus) against Prost and Rosberg (Mclaren) , Mansell and Piquet (Williams=most powerfull car in grid)...16 Gps, 8 poles for Senna...please not compare driver cheat in car cheat with one driver what defeated many Worlds Champions in inferior car....
hahaha.....Villeneuve is the good driver, but is ridiculous in rain tracks.....in períod recently of schumacher in f1....only Barrichello is good in rain conditions....but ferrari team orders....look german 2000 for exemple....all time Rubens with dry tires.....no possibility for team orders...
@GinderDeath: Its bullshit what you say my friend.... The Ferarri was a fucking shit at this year. Williams was much better. But at 96 there are no traction control on cars. The difference between "drivers" was much bigger in rain than today.
That is indeed correect, jfk87n! The Ferraris were technically inferior to the Newey-designed Williams of '96 and '97, and the only time that technical inferiority was visibly neutralized was under heavy rain conditions. Under limited-traction wet-track conditions, the lap times came down to the driving abilities of the F1 pilots. And under those conditions---especially without traction control--Michael Schumacher was in a class of HIS OWN, also better than the much overrated Senna.
it's funny to see how huge was the difference was between cars at this time. The difference was 4 seconds for each lap and it looked quite normal t the time, today when it's 0.5 we consider it a big difference xP
He is a Rainmaster, but he is also human, everyone makes mistakes and in that race in monaco he took a corner too tight and slipped away on the wet curb...simple as that...but if you remember the 1997 season, there he proved (in Monaco) that he was by far the best driver in the rain at that time.
Yes Schumacher drive in 8 cilinders of the 10. 2 is in mal function
tiofer 4 weeks ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Senna in 84 at Monaco in a Toleman was 6 seconds a lap faster than anybody on the track
Schum is driving a Ferrari
Need to say anything more?
PsilocybeBRA 1 month ago
@PsilocybeBRA
Yes : you should add that Bellof was faster than Senna
bonshommes 1 month ago 22
@bonshommes @PsilocybeBRA
1st: Senna was 4 seconds faster than anybody else.
2nd: Stefan Bellof's car was illegal, it was too light.
xLeon161x 4 weeks ago
@bonshommes In 97 Monaco Schumacher was also 4-5 seconds a lap faster in early laps
rosun82 2 weeks ago
@PsilocybeBRA
the ferrari was not the best car in 1996, and its not fair to say its only the car.
best example is this video here, the williams is the best car, but hill and villeneuve arent able to use the advatage of this car...
Fisico87 4 weeks ago
i think alot of people are forgetting senna at monaco in 84, and suzuka in 88 or 89 i cant remember...also when people say that his car had electronic aids in the donington gp of 93 you have to remember that he was also using slick tyres, whereas everyone else had wets and the cars at the front all had electronic aids which put them essentially on an even playing field
bradleyblackster 1 month ago
@bradleyblackster man..did Senna really have slicks? I don´t know if it´s true but that would be awesome to know! still I´m not sure, it was too wet for slicks..
bourlivak88 1 month ago
@bourlivak88 he did mate, he said so in the post race press conference at least
bradleyblackster 1 month ago
- The master of rain goes by another name, your name is SENNA. They want to talk about the difficulty of running with car without electronic help, remember the second race in F1 and Senna his first F1 victory. Among other races in the rain he gave a concert. ;)
playmobil911 1 month ago
Frankly speaking Villeneuve and Senna did have more swagger than schumi (in todays era Hamilton resembles that) but if you're gonna judge a driver by the stats you really have only one option.
Senna was great in rain and so too Schumi but imho fisichella staying put in that 2004 brazilian grand prix in a jordan while all bigwigs crashed out was a great scene.
chiranjib91 2 months ago
fuck everyone commenting about senna, it's ridiculous how people can't get over the past and recognize the great drivers of today. no disrespect to senna though, just to the people constantly commenting about him.
mikidof 2 months ago
@mikidof The reason people still talk about Senna today is because he was one of the all time greatest drivers in F1 history. senna is to F1 what Muhammed Ali is to Boxing, Pele to football, Shane Warne to cricket etc etc. That's why people still talk about him.
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
everyone conparing this to senna in 93 and saying chumi is better because of no driver aids... everyone had no aids so in the wet, car control shined through even more which means schumis emphatic win looks alot better than if it would of been with traction control ect.
l0dgey 3 months ago
@l0dgey Agree with that. Also, the debate between who was better between Schumi & Senna will rage on forever. 1 thing can not be disputed though. Nobody could touch either of them in the rain.
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
All Hamilton percetanges are BS. Wait for him to get a more few years on F1 and see all his stats drop. The fact he started in McLaren helped him a lot, all the good drivers in f1 have started with a crappy team, but not Hamilton.
felipemuve 5 months ago
@felipemuve It's not really fair to pass judgement based on the fact that Hamilton started at mcLaren. Also, what you're saying isn't strictly true. Jim Clark, another all time great, started at Lotus when they were at the height of their powers yet nobody levels the same criticism at him. Also, if we are discounting a sportsman's achievments because they started at a top team then does that mean the football careers of Giggs, Scholes, G.Neville & Beckham should also be overlooked
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
oh man, this one's in German. wish there would be English translation. but great vid, btw.
urlady21 5 months ago
5:54 looks like a speedboat race.
mindeloman 5 months ago
This is why i love F1. At indy, this would be a red flag condition.
mindeloman 5 months ago
I remember this race, it was an excellent drive by Schumi without question. To people claiming that Schumi is the "rain master" are incorrect, the real "rain master" is Senna - he won 60% of the wet races he competed in and Schumi 40%. Hamilton actually has a better wet record then Schumi now which drops him to 3rd place. Yes Schumi is a great wet weather driver, but not the best. BTW even Schumi himself claims Ayrton is the greatest.
izybluffen 5 months ago
@izybluffen Proof about Schumacher saying Ayrton's the greatest?
F1TomM 5 months ago
@F1TomM It's on the Top Gear tribute to Senna - It's at 2:38 but watch from 2:20 to see the other drivers have thier say........ You may as well watch the whole thing it's a good tribute.
izybluffen 5 months ago
@izybluffen Ok, seems strange that a person like Schumacher saying anything like that.
F1TomM 5 months ago
@F1TomM If the "statisical" greatest driver claims Senna is the "greatest" that has to count for a massive chunk. I got big respect for Schumi saying that.
izybluffen 5 months ago
@izybluffen Agreed, it should also be remembered how much of an impoact that Senna had upon Schumacher's career. Despite the fact that Schumi & Senna had their differences in 92&93 Schumacher's admiration of Senna is well documented and Schumacher's attention to detail with the car & fitness also owes a lot (although not 100%) to what he saw Senna doing at the time. There's a great book call Schumacher:The Edge of Greatness by James Allen that gives a great insight into this
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
@izybluffen schumacher stated when he was at his prime that he dosent want to be treated specially. he said in my opinion im just able to drive cars round a race track faster and better than everyone else. and i love it when all schumacher haters actually really respect his opinion when it comes to senna. and you can honestly get stuffed saying hamilton is a better driver in the wet. hes just got a higher ratio because he aint bin here as long.SCHUMSCHER IS THE BEST END OF!!!!!!!!!
jfzclips 1 month ago
Ето го осемкратния 2012г.
kracme 5 months ago
Най великият!!!!!!!!!!!!
kracme 5 months ago
A master in motion
TheJansin 5 months ago
One of his greatest highlights, like Ungarn 98 or Hockenheim Qualifying 2004
samothsamothsamoth 5 months ago
why did nobody tell Schumacher its raining?
exotic1902 5 months ago
sure, safety and everything but thats why i dont watch F1 anymore - its boring as hell nowadays
Validols 5 months ago
The good old days when f1 cars were allowed to race in the wet
1234tux 6 months ago
haha der REGENGOTT!
spechtbert 6 months ago
everyone say senna is the best because he died at his best. the story could be different if michael die in 2004, everyone will praise that schumacher is the best
seems some people made rule like this --> "racer who died at his/her best is the best of all time"
and people doesnt take a look on struggling character like prost, mansell, and schumacher which they dont die on their golden era
parampam92 6 months ago
Senna won in Donninton 93 in the rain with a car full of electronic aids, while Schumacher had not any electronic aid. Even Michael Andretti in that Mclaren overtook Schumi! That was a joke!!!
But in Barcelona 92 in the rain, both drove with no traction controls, and Senna could not be as fast as Schumacher and finally Senna crashed trying to catch Schumi. First victory of Schumacher, Spa 92, and there was rain, beating Mansell, Senna... everyone !
Schumacher is the greatest driver ever!!
hunt2727 6 months ago 116
@hunt2727 AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Not even close.
NOXXism 5 months ago
@hunt2727 In 93 all the cars had electronic helps......... and for belgium 92 Senna made the wrong tire choice
from33to77 4 months ago
@hunt2727 andretti crashed at first corner get your facts right.
l0dgey 3 months ago
@l0dgey 3rd corner*
l0dgey 3 months ago
@hunt2727 LOL Sure if your a moron and judge a drivers skill level based on one race alone.
aieljose 3 months ago
@hunt2727 without any doubts....he is the best...maybe for eternity
CERNIUM 3 months ago
1) On route to his famous Donington win Senna mugged Schumacher and left him trailing in his wake despite the fact that Schumacher's Benneton was a superior car.
2) The McLaren that Senna was driving was one of the worst cars McLaren have built in the last 25 years. To win in the manner that he did was world class.
3) I can't believe a Schumi fan is making a point about driving aids after Schumi & Beneton's cheating throughout 94.
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
@chrismarkbicknell you my friend know nothing. proof is 1993 benneton were crap. senna had a better car but schumacher still beat him. more proof is 1992 spa. thats when senna started getting jelouse of schumacher and then when schumacher finally eclipsed him in 1994 he made up a stupid story that he had electronic aids because senna kept crashing but schumacher had perfect car controle. you and your other stupid senna fans make up crap to blacken schumis name. shumis the best
jfzclips 1 month ago
Just to correct you on a few points.
1) in 93 the Benneton had a WORKS ford engine & the McLaren only had a customer Ford engine so no, Senna did not have the better car at all.
2) Senna finished 2nd in the WDC to Schumacher's 4th (21 points ahead)
3) Benneton were found guilty by the FIA of hiding electronic aids within their software.
4) Senna was not "jealous" of Schumi. He simply recognised that he would be the next big thing.
However, you are right about Spa 92. He was superb that day.
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
@chrismarkbicknell I´d say Schumacher was very unlucky in 1993..he had many failures while being in the lead or in the top three..
bourlivak88 1 month ago
@chrismarkbicknell- Said it all! kkkkkkkkkkk
playmobil911 1 month ago
@chrismarkbicknell nobody was cheating you dumbass..senna didn´t want to look ridiculously slow so he thought up this freakin story..lol
bourlivak88 1 month ago
@bourlivak88 Wrong, Benneton were found gulty of having electronic aids within their software and fined heavily. Ross Brawn would later admit that the TCS & Launch Control could be activated by using a laptop. It turns out that Senna's hunch about the Benneton team was correct. This would later be confirmed by Schumacher's team mate Verstappen.. Also, I don't appreciate the childish insult in your opening remark.
chrismarkbicknell 3 weeks ago
@chrismarkbicknell no no no..and Verstappen is a cunty cunt..lol
bourlivak88 3 weeks ago
@bourlivak88 That was it?? that was you response. Ok then, I'll let you get back to your ABBA videos!!!
chrismarkbicknell 3 weeks ago
@hunt2727 When the track's wet electronic aids are pretty much useless. However, I do agree that Schumacher was awesome in Spa 92. I think it's impossible to say who was the better wet weather driver between the 2. There is no doubt that they were both untouchable in the rain. Why do i prefer Senna to Schumacher? Senna's style. Pure & simple. Put it this way, which football team would you prefer to watch Barcelona or Real Madrid, Which boxer Rocky Marciano or Muhammed Ali???
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
@hunt2727 Excellent comment, We expect from Schumi this season to show only half of this piece of skills. SCHUMI & FANS for lifeeeee
Ferraristaaa 5 days ago
proof that hill wouldn't have won anything if he wasn't in the superior car
crouchysrobot 6 months ago
@crouchysrobot Hungaroring 1997 and Spa 1998 disprove your sentiment.
darthbandon10 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Senna in donninton 93 was good with those traction controls...
But even a bad driver as Michael andretti in that Mclaren was very very fast, and he even overtook Schumacher in the wet!!! (before crashing so bad he was...)
wow! those traction controls that Senna had were very good!
But both with no traction controls, barcelona 92, and Senna crashed trying to be as fast as Schumacher!! First Victory of schumacher: Spa 92 with rain, beating Senna, Mansell...
Schumacher the best in history!
hunt2727 7 months ago 17
and nowadays they stop the race when theres a little bit of a bad visibility..
the days of weak men i tell u
rastamees 7 months ago 3
@rastamees
I totally agree with you. When I saw what happened In Canada this year I was honestly asking myself, "Why are they stopping the race?" It's a joke now
OCX600RR 7 months ago 3
@jotakh Dude, again: I'm not comparing them. There is no such need and no point at all in this discussion. If you think Senna is way better, good for you then. Some think Schumacher is better. Good for them. I have no respect for crazy fans seeking for a SxS discussion. I'm a fan of racing, and when I turn on the TV I hope I can see a performance like this one here, or Donington 93, or Barrichello/Silverstone/03 and so it goes. If you care so much for this SxS discussion then you're not a F1 fan
rafamac 7 months ago 2
TILL TODAY........SCHUMI STILL THE WET RACE MASTER(RAIN KING)......EVEN THE LATEST GRAND PRIX IN CANADA 2011......HE PROVED AGAIN EVEN HE NEVER WIN THE RACE.....BRAVO SCHUMI
balan4668 7 months ago
Und wenn es heute leicht tröpfelt kommt gleich das Safety-Car raus...
DasNekalain 7 months ago
this video starts PERFECTLY! :)
foreseenprophecies 8 months ago
Hat das damals eigentlich auch schon Heiko Wasser moderiert?
wenzeslaus 8 months ago
@wenzeslaus yep der ist seit anfang an mit dabei. Genau wie der unsägliche Kai Ebel.
mrbiggles211 8 months ago
@mrbiggles211 Hehe stimmt, der Kai ist wirklich ne Marke. Besonders diese Fahrerinterviews vor dem Start. Unaushaltbar und absolut fremdschämenswert.
Wäre mal Zeit zu Sky zu wechseln. Weiß allerdings nicht ob die Kommentare (C. Danner jetzt mal ausgenommen) dort wirklich besser sind?
wenzeslaus 8 months ago
@wenzeslaus Leider haben sich meine Fremdschämenqualitätien in beinah 20 jahren nicht wirklich verbessert. Sobald ich den Kai sehe geht mein finger automatisch richtung stummtaste.
Was Sky betrifft, kann ich auch nicht sagen ob die besseres personal in der boxengasse haben.
mrbiggles211 8 months ago
Even the Williams mechanics are enjoying this magnificent driving
blerand91 9 months ago
staat bij villeneuve de handrem d,r op ???
of is michael nou zo snel hahahahahahahahahaahaaaa
schummiehugo 9 months ago
People who say Schumacher isnt good are DUMB. Dumbest people. And always trying to compare with Senna. At Senna's time Schumi was awesome in a Benetton too.. Lets see what Hamilton or Alonso does when they gets as old as Schumi..... Tired of these stupid YT comments
FERRARIAVI 9 months ago 2
@jotakh Lol you deleted your comment.. First of all who cares about you getting tireds about my comments.. i dont even know you fuck off.. And where did AI say Benettom????????? see my previous comment.. Get some glasses.. One thing Schumi fans know Senna fans are arrogant and not decent at all.. One thing they should learn from Schumi.. Always a gentleman.. Ayrton never was a gentleman but very agressive with his beahviousr everywhere..
FERRARIAVI 7 months ago
@FERRARIAVI Agreed. Even though I am more of a Senna and Mansell fan I can never understand the people on here who dismiss 1 because they are a fan of the other. Schumacher is 1 of the greatest natural talents we have seen in the sport. However, even the most ardent Schumi fan can not get away from the fact that he will always have question marks against his sportsmanship.
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
Really love watching wet races like this back then. These days I have to pray they don't keep the safety car out too long each time it rains. Last year's Korean GP is a good example why, the safety car was out for way longer than it had to.
Hornet85 11 months ago
GRANDIOSO.
ciprianito9 11 months ago
As Stirling Moss quoted, "this was not a race this was a demonstration of brilliance..."
MotorsportMonster 1 year ago
someone tell him its raining..
Rilox 1 year ago 2
I think everybody remember the praised Senna's driving in Donington 1993. But the performance shown in here is just as incredible (Although not as much mentioned). Schumacher humiliated everyone else in this GP. A true highlight in his career.
rafamac 1 year ago 43
@rafamac +1 many forget he gave 2 second to the whole field by every laps.
and this performance was shown in most probably the worst ferrari in history.
melchizedekful 1 year ago
@rafamac
Donington park 1993...Senna´s car had tractioncontrol (TS! )
some cars/teams didnt have it at all.
hlidskjalf666 10 months ago 4
@hlidskjalf666 Sorry, but I guess you read some bad information. Williams Renault had the traction control and active suspension, Senna was struggling in an underpowered Mclaren.
youmontanha 9 months ago
@youmontanha
you´re not sorry, I am....because you are a maniac!
the McLaren MP4/8 designed by Neil Oatley around advanced racecar technology, including a semi-automatic transmission, active suspension and traction control systems.
Williams/Renault ? Yea so, Michael drove Benetton xD. fail
And ffs check facts before even try reply next time. its all there (wiki)
hlidskjalf666 9 months ago
@hlidskjalf666 I checked the facts in a website (Youtube doesn't let me put the link, farzadsf1gallery, look for Donington park 1993)
Then I saw your comment... and I replied it.
I don't write anything without knowing at least a bit, if this website is wrong... sorry. I didn't really saw the races.
Wiki just complied with the information I did read.
But that's not the point... thei are all good pilots :)
youmontanha 9 months ago
@hlidskjalf666 All 3 of those teams had the systems in place. However, in wet conditions their usefullness is massivly reduced.
chrismarkbicknell 1 month ago
@hlidskjalf666 I "guess" you are a troll, but as said, a lot of cars had TC in 1993, including Benneton and Williams. Besides, Williams had enormous superiority for the whole season. Either way, please understand I'm not comparing Senna and Schumacher. I just said this performance shown here is awesome.
rafamac 7 months ago
@rafamac
I´m more a troll-hunter!
*Check it up. In DoningtonPark not all cars had installed T-C !!!!
yes they had it in the SEASON 1993, but not in all RACES in 1993.
hlidskjalf666 7 months ago
Comment removed
rafamac 1 year ago
Cette course restera la plus belle de toutes les courses de Schumacher... Alors que beaucoup de pilotes pensaient être les meilleurs sur piste mouillée
schampiondumonde 1 year ago
Schumi 96 ferrari look like a brick compared to JV's williams.but still...
ej36055 1 year ago
Only 6 drivers finished the race. Schumacher, Alesi, Villeneuve, Frentzen, Hakkinen, Diniz.
darthbandon10 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
je ne parlais pas Allemande
guromaon 1 year ago
THE MASTER!!!!!!! OF F1!!!!!!!
mrmikespence1964 1 year ago
look on youtube (Ayrton Senna - Top Gear - Part 1 of 2)
Schumacher admits that Senna is the best.
Even the reporter who was not a fan of Senna at the end becomes a fan.
GuidoJensen10 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
F1 Racing (magazine of the largest automotive genre) 29/12/2006: Ayrton Senna was named the fastest rider of all time in Formula 1. In an article published in the British magazine F1 Racing, "the Brazilian overcame again the seven times champion Michael Schumacher, who came in second.
Lewis Hamilton: Schumacher has been phenomenal. But Senna was the best.
If those who live there and really understands F1 says so, who are we to oppose them, is not it?!
GuidoJensen10 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Prost: "Senna is unparalleled"
Ron Dennis: "Senna and Prost were the best I've ever seen in F1, Senna being a little more talented."
Jack Stewart: "Riders like Senna are born only every 100 years"
GuidoJensen10 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bernie Ecclestone (Formula 1 boss) 07/05/2008: "Senna was the best of all time"
Fittipaldi 22/10/206: "Senna was better than Schumacher." Alonso will be champion BI-upon Schumy. "
Flavio Briatore (Renault boss) 01/18/2008: The only extra-regarded by the Italian sprinter was a triple world champion Ayrton Senna, named as the Maradona of the tracks. Seven times champion Michael Schumacher would be between Alonso and Senna, one of Marco Van Basten
GuidoJensen10 1 year ago
Gilles Villeneuve Is master in rain. Montreal 1981 with a broken wing arrived 3rd
RedhotIta1 1 year ago
DAS waren noch Zeiten!!!! Die F1 noch 1000ps, Schumacher bekannt als unbesiegbare Maschine, RTL noch kein totaler Schwachsinn...herrlich xD
Ich habe Schumi geliebt, ihn das erste Mal fahren sehen, da war ich 4 Jahre alt, war Autofan, bin mit ihm aufgewachsen, habe ihn bewundert...und geweint als er aufgehört hat!
CrimnlBT 1 year ago 3
danielaebi you say bullshit benetton was never better than williams NOOB
Grisu94x 1 year ago 2
Saw this years back live on TV...If I remember properly, he annihilated all of them and finished with over a minute and a half after 2 or 3 pit-stops...epic driving
mdfk667 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Schunacher its a terrible driver! Only won because had the teammates to help him! that's why he will be forever behind Senna (true driver), Fanggio and Prost.
Schumacher and Alonso was the worse thing that happened to F1.
whitesharkbr 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Schunacher its a terrible driver! Only won because had the teammates to help him! that's why he will be forever behind Senna (true driver), Fanggio and Prost.
Schumacher and Alonso was the worse thing that happened to F1.
whitesharkbr 1 year ago
@whitesharkbr lay off the drugs, mate ;)
mynkNX 1 year ago
@mynkNX I think that Alonso sux two
TheVestep 1 year ago
Senna in donninton 93 was good with those traction controls...
but even a bad driver as Michael andretti in that Mclaren was very very fast, and he even overtook Schumacher in the wet!!! (before crashing so bad he was...)
wow! that traction controls that Senna had were very very good!!
But Senna in barcelona 92 without traction controls crashed trying to be as fast as Schumacher!!
wow! Schumacher is the best in history!
hunt2727 1 year ago 4
@hunt2727 aha what about monaco 1984, ever heard of Tolmann? no? lets say its like the modern equal of Hispania racing TEAM, hmmm 2nd at Monaco '84 Senna
and Lets Remember not active suspension or TC, Semi-auto gearbox,
just one big Turbo! giving lots of power in one big kick!!! just what you need in the rain. oh by the way who els was driving that day in 84 Prost Mansell Lauda Arnoux Rosberg Patrese Piquet.Wait that 4 World champs in that Year. how many in 1996?
danielaebi 1 year ago
@hunt2727 The Benetton from Schummel had more power traction control better handling just google Cosworth and you will see
danielaebi 1 year ago
Michael, Michael #1 driver in history of Formel eins, ya ya bitte!! I love Michael, he's a crazy genius like me!!
manomogul 1 year ago
beautiful car. one of the most beautiful ones in my opinion.
bubi8894 1 year ago
Can somebody go and tell Michael that it is raining??
joaquinveyron 1 year ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
Can somebody tell michael that its raining?
joaquinveyron 1 year ago
@Schumifreak9 Yeah indeed.. imagine if this would happen again... Schumi The Rain King returns!!!!
IF this would happen i'm 100% sure we'll see the old Schumi again :3
Gamez4Lif3 1 year ago
That is one good looking and sounding Ferrari
launger 1 year ago
i9 miss the old mika hakkinen vs michael schumacher times ^^ real fights on the limit of theyre cars. hit the break as late as possible... and fuk fia with theyre new bullsh1t rules...
TheMaroth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Have you seen "Senna ultrapassa Schumacher" video in yt? (Canada 93)
watch?v=aQMvWHqOhig&feature=related
In the video Senna does not overtake Schumacher at all!!
But there are so many Schumacher haters that are really sure about Senna does that!
And even they erase the comments to say the truth!
Schumacher haters want to live in paralell universe I think...
hunt2727 1 year ago
If this would happened this year, the Safety car would be on track asap.
TomekLeeChan 1 year ago
It wasn't just that the Ferrari was slow (well, it wasn't SLOW, the engine still had some power in a straight line) it just handled poorly and yet Michael did amazing things with it. What is more impressive, in my mind, was his second place at Brazil where the revolutionary new titanium casing gearbox was replaced with the old rear-end of the 1995 car (originally designed for a V12) causing it to handle horribly. Pouring down rain and he managed second!
pooweebucket 1 year ago 2
would this happen nowadays the reporters would go crazy
jimpornse 1 year ago
and to think the ferrari was a shit box awesome driving from schumy bet ya u will see alot of this in a mercedes lol go schumy!!!!!!!!!!!!!
alkliquid 1 year ago
I remember this race. It was his first victory as Ferrari driver. The 96 car was pretty awful, yet on that day, Shumi´s fastest lap of the race was 4 seconds faster than anyone else. A magic day
ceSniperFactor 1 year ago
There's so much Rain pouring down, But ur driving like it's dry.
Ferraristaaa 2 years ago 4
schumacer might never had started on pole with senna but he still beat him even when senna had pole
stevenmcg69 2 years ago 65
@stevenmcg69 in season of 1993, Schumacher says at Silverstone:" The Benetton is better what Mclaren"...93= 5 wins for Senna. 1 for MS ( Senna retired because engine problems).
guigo00018 2 years ago
in 1994 ms beat senna in every race up till that very sad moment in imola this will always be a case off i say you say but sadly we will never no. the world was robbed off what would have been an epic battle between the 2 .
stevenmcg69 2 years ago 7
the McLaren was better but what do u expect Schumacher to say? He wouldnt say the MCLaren is better then Benetton.
sharpanator 1 year ago
@guigo00018
Crap. In Senna's 5 wins, 2 were inherited from misfortune of Alain Prost and Michael Schumacher. And Michael Schumacher should have won the monaco gp of 93. Also at the end of 1993 in the last 3 races he had the best car. Even shit Michael Andretti was doing well in it and so was Hakkinen. That puts Schumi at 2 wins to Senna's 3 wins but in Schumacher's only second year in Formula 1 with an unreliable car compared to Senna's 10 years of experience . OWNED.
Anime998877 1 year ago
@stevenmcg69 The thing is you can talk that talk all day but fact is schuey will always have the word cheat on his CV.
lespaulicetea 1 year ago
@lespaulicetea u meen the same way senna cheated all great drivers do what it takes
stevenmcg69 1 year ago
@stevenmcg69 In the beginning of 1994 MS was using illegal fuel. Moreover Senna had problems owing to the size of the cockpit, consequence of a wrong design (the problem the tried to solve at Imola 94 by cutting and welding the steering column). This is the reason why SENNA did not win the first 3 races in 1994. But if you consider that Hill was to be champion at the end of 1994, you clearly see that Senna would have beaten MS for sure
mkhkknn 1 year ago
@mkhkknn but i do not count and if anything, only the facts matter, and Schumacher has scored 7
MrFerraristadoc 1 year ago
@MrFerraristadoc HONKY! WELL SAID!
mrmikespence1964 1 year ago
@stevenmcg69, Unfortunately MSC who compares with Senna Senna should never have seen fly, I followed all the career of Ayrton Senna and can say that near Senna MSC was just a good driver, nothing more than this amount of bonds far from an accredit comparing these two great drivers, Senna is unsurpassed.
sandrorhoads 10 months ago
@sandrorhoads what are you on bout...
1. FUCK off this is a Schumi video.
2. Schumacher outraced Senna several times 1992,1994
(as a rookie with inferior car on top of that ! )
hlidskjalf666 10 months ago
@hlidskjalf666 FUCK off this is a CRAP Schumi video !!!
Senna simply the best, i am sorry for you.
sandrorhoads 10 months ago
@sandrorhoads Michael is a GOD, shut up with Senna. 7 World Champion titels. In the time at 2000 he had clearly the inferior car. And he kicked them in her arses, so he is the best of all time. Remember Barichello and Irvine, they had the same car like Michael..... and where they are......... They were crap...!!!
Eandeavour 9 months ago 3
@Eandeavour wake up....
sandrorhoads 9 months ago
@sandrorhoads so are you suggesting that it must have been jesus in that car instead of shumi. and im pretty sure simply the best was on shumis pit board when he won the 2003 world championship:P
jlcoug 8 months ago
@stevenmcg69
please do not compare Senna with Schumacher ..... 'm sorry ....
DarkEquilibrium81 10 months ago
FERRARI WONS...THE PILOT COULD BE ANYONE....
DarkEquilibrium81 10 months ago
@DarkEquilibrium81
hi there pro
* Ferrar wins 1991-1995 = the same amount of wins as 1996 when SCHUMACHER joined.
* Ferrari last championship until the day schumi joined:
(Jody Scheckter in 1979). During those years the Ferrari was driven by some guys named, Prost, Mansell and G. Villeneuve....!"
hlidskjalf666 10 months ago
@DarkEquilibrium81 could be anyone hmmmmm really were was his team mate again ? no where near him so ferrari win... plot was schumacer skill
stevenmcg69 10 months ago
piss off jealous cunts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oeppe 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Senna won three F1 titles with TECHNICALLY DOMINANT CARS THAT WERE ALREADY RACE WINNERS BEFORE SENNA JOINED THE TEAM.
Schumi NEVER joined a winning team, converting a no-name brand like Benetton to a double world champion. In 1996, Schumi joined Ferrari which was the ridicule of F1 at the time, and when MSC won his first Ferrari title in 2000, it was the first drivers title in 21 years. HOMO Senna died childless and some of you inserted their soft peckers into Senna's COLON VAGINA (asshole)
TheDRANALYSIS111 2 years ago
Bei diesen Bedingungen hat sich immer gezeigt, wer der WAHRE Weltmeister war, Hill, Villeneuve und Häkkinen waren im Regen NIE in der Lage einen Schumacher das Wasser reichen!
Einen gab es, der Schumacher das Leben hätte schwer machen können, AYRTON SENNA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dopaminist 2 years ago 4
Senna hin oder her. Dazu ist es nie gekommen und damit nicht relevant.
dominian 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@maconhadalata: You must be a butt-fucking illiterate SPIC BOY, and I would like to keep you around my pharmaceutical laboratory as a FUCKING LATINO SLAVE. You were born to serve your WHITE and SUPERIOR ACADEMIC MASTERS. Briatore is a FUCKING SCUMBAG CHEATER, WHILE THE GREATEST CHAMPION OF ALL TIMES---MICHAEL SCHUMACHER---NEVER HAD ANY REASON TO CHEAT ON ACCOUNT OF HIS SUPERIOR DRIVING.
M. Schumacher maintains a staff of LATINO SLAVES at his superior mansion outside of Lake Geneva. FUCK YOU!!!
TheDRANALYSIS111 2 years ago
TheDRANALYSIS111 se ve que no eres un seguidor de la formula 1 como tu vas a decir esas cosas de ayrton senna es verdad q shumi es el mejor piloto de la historia pero senna no c queda atras y para mi es uno de los mejores de todos los tiempos y te apuesto que si senna no hubiera muerto a shumi se le viera echo dificil conseguir todos esos logros que hasta ahora se ve dificil de romper
elysaulxx 2 years ago
Claro que SI, el DR ANALYSIS es un seguidor de la Formula Uno. Pero no estoy dispuesto de exagerar los hechos de Senna, quien era un buen piloto POR UNA SOLA VUELTA, pero Senna era un piloto MUY MEDIOCRE EN EL TRANSCURSO DE UNA CARRERA (90 min.). Senna era un PRINCIPE DE LA MEDIOCRIDAD, convertiendo 65 pole posiciones en solo 41 victorias, mientras de que Schumacher convertio 68 pole posiciones en 91 VICTORIAS, con mas de 70 vueltas mas rapidas de la carrera (Senna tenia solo 19). KEEP IT REAL!
TheDRANALYSIS111 2 years ago
auhauhauh you're a fucking mojado.....how's the rio grande crossing?did your mother pay the coyotes doing bj"s?
maconhadalata 2 years ago
crei q no sabias de formula 1 pero ya veo q eres un seguidor . creo q se te olvido q senna tiene sus 41 victorias y 65 poles en 162 grandes premios .Mientras q shumi logro sus records con 250 grandes premios te lo aseguro q de no morir senna los numeros de ambos pilotos fueran diferentes pero shumi es el mejor de la historia aunque para mi el mejor piloto en la actualidad es kimi
elysaulxx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheDRANALYSIS111 Schumacher never conquerer pole against Senna. Scumacher only conquerer pole with best car in grid.Schumacher 68 pole in 7 seasons with best car(Benetton 94,95) Ferrari 2000,01,02,03,04....Senna 61 pole, 2 seasons in best car (Mclaren 88,89).
guigo00018 2 years ago
Who is interested in pole? Senna took every pole and Prost won the championship. With all the rule changes pole was even less important. Without petrol Schumacher would have had much more poles. Tactics and how much fuel u took with u was more important.
Mummins 2 years ago 24
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheDRANALYSIS111 Sign my think...1988 in 16 gp Senna 13 poles against Team mate Prost..in 1993 16 gp, Prost 13 Poles against Hill...in 1994 so hard to Schumacher defeated Hill cheating..
guigo00018 2 years ago
@guigo00018: Senna pudo mostrar su "talento" solo con coches que fueron tecnicamente SUPERIOR...pero Schumacher gano titulos en la Formula Uno con coches INFERIORES. En la lluvia Senna era bien cuando tenia coches con CONTROL DE TRACCION....pero Schumacher controlo el Ferrari de 1996 SIN CONTROL DE TRACCION. SENNA ERA UN MUCHACHO MEDIOCRE DEL TERCER MUNDO....Y TU ERES UN TRIPLE HIJO DE PUTA, ASI COMO EL MEDIOCRE Y MUERTO SENNA!!!!
TheDRANALYSIS111 2 years ago
@TheDRANALYSIS111 Thanks for your words....we are the third world.....however we are the best......third world wins of "first world".......in sports most populars like f1 and soccer.....brazil rullezzz...the best driver: senna....the best player: Pelé all this with pure talent.....and no investiments...no money...
guigo00018 2 years ago
You are not educated....respect this people who to rest....we discuting f1...but like Schumacher...you not respect all others...Drivers are peoples...Drivers not numbers....its f1 is only sport
guigo00018 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheDRANALYSIS111 in 1985 Ayrton Senna = 16 Gp, in medium car (Lotus) 7 poles against top cars Prost/Lauda (Mclaren), Mansell/Rosberg (Williams) and Piquet (Brabham)...7 poles against 4,3,1,1,3 World Champions...in medium car....Schumacher never start in pole while Senna alive....Schumacher only pole after Senna dead against???? nobody....
guigo00018 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheDRANALYSIS111 1986 Ayrton Senna in medium car (Lotus) against Prost and Rosberg (Mclaren) , Mansell and Piquet (Williams=most powerfull car in grid)...16 Gps, 8 poles for Senna...please not compare driver cheat in car cheat with one driver what defeated many Worlds Champions in inferior car....
guigo00018 2 years ago
hahaha.....Villeneuve is the good driver, but is ridiculous in rain tracks.....in períod recently of schumacher in f1....only Barrichello is good in rain conditions....but ferrari team orders....look german 2000 for exemple....all time Rubens with dry tires.....no possibility for team orders...
guigo00018 2 years ago
@GinderDeath: Its bullshit what you say my friend.... The Ferarri was a fucking shit at this year. Williams was much better. But at 96 there are no traction control on cars. The difference between "drivers" was much bigger in rain than today.
jfk87n 2 years ago 3
No TC since 2008
longshot14 2 years ago
That is indeed correect, jfk87n! The Ferraris were technically inferior to the Newey-designed Williams of '96 and '97, and the only time that technical inferiority was visibly neutralized was under heavy rain conditions. Under limited-traction wet-track conditions, the lap times came down to the driving abilities of the F1 pilots. And under those conditions---especially without traction control--Michael Schumacher was in a class of HIS OWN, also better than the much overrated Senna.
TheDRANALYSIS111 2 years ago 3
it's funny to see how huge was the difference was between cars at this time. The difference was 4 seconds for each lap and it looked quite normal t the time, today when it's 0.5 we consider it a big difference xP
GrinderDeath 2 years ago
If Schuey was the Rainmaster what happened in Monaco the same year? :P
Apart from that great vid of a true F1 legend.
TasmanProductions 2 years ago
He is a Rainmaster, but he is also human, everyone makes mistakes and in that race in monaco he took a corner too tight and slipped away on the wet curb...simple as that...but if you remember the 1997 season, there he proved (in Monaco) that he was by far the best driver in the rain at that time.
DarthVop 2 years ago 4
nobody is perfect man,that's what make us humans.He made a mistake so what?
CazouS 2 years ago 2
Simply the best!!!!
Felyestay 2 years ago 2
The Guy that talkes is Heiko Wasser
He's comin from my home town in Germany:Gladbeck =)
btight96 2 years ago
2:02 lol.
fulgoreblack 2 years ago 2
villeneuve's a pussy in the wet.
Soundgarden1009 2 years ago 3
The Ferrari at 97 was a fucking shit....
Great Performance...
jfk87n 2 years ago 3
Even better performance if you recognize that this happened in 96
zsebtelep 2 years ago 3
the best of all time
compare to his aggro pushing races at hungary 98, monaco 97 and brazil 06
Xraider65 2 years ago 7