Added: 2 years ago
From: YanStevenUT
Views: 5,268
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 佢好似講錯晒啲歷史喎, 城寨係中英聯合聲明嗰陣雙方同意清拆及重建為公園, 個公園係1994年由彭定康剪綵, 你唔知就唔好Y曲歷史啦.....入到城寨公園都有介紹架, 太過份啦!!!

  • @raneejessie : 1994年

    [Reply by YanSteven} : history is 1897, 99 yrs. ago.

    this is the Chinese Building, should not 係中英聯合聲明嗰陣

    雙方同意清拆 .. and knob it down. now, no more !!!

    what a pity ...

    .

  • @YanStevenUT

    1897嗰陣係租借界限街以北至沙頭角中英, 當時英國政府把新的租界叫做新界=新的租界意思........­但係起簽的條約當中, 係講明城寨唔租, 係由清政府管治返.......(中間再細節啲嘢唔講住)...­........你有冇睇段片嗰人講嘢? 佢話係因為回歸先有呢個公園, 我係想講返, 起1983年中英聯合聲明提到香港會回歸中國, 而其後數年中英亦有因城寨而作出討論....最後起80年代中後­決定起而家個公園, 1994年由彭定康先生剪綵開幕..............如­果你想知道更多細節, 我可以e-mail比你 or 你自己親身到寨城公園睇下^^

  • @raneejessie : 中英聯合聲明嗰陣雙方同意清拆及重建為公園...

    [Reply by YanSteven] : 城寨是香港古跡文物, 亦是中國古跡文物歷史見證,

     應保留, 不是由彭定康剪綵過就拆去, 不應該由中英聯合聲明嗰陣雙方同意清拆就拆去, 香港很多古跡就這樣拆掉, ...

    我講的 point 與你的 point 有出入, 我本人就是歷史見證, 我住過城寨很多年。

  • @YanStevenUT

    係呀, 我同你係有啲出入架, 因為我係想更嗰個講錯歷史既人嘛.....

    我都覺得寨城唔應該拆, 好可惜......我當年好細個, 我未懂得向社會反影,

    寨城真係一個宏偉既建築, 成個城區都係得個公園咁大, 但係佢既伙數令人驚訝,

    當年拆之前, 日本有個團體特登來考察, 而家有本書係講寨城架.....係香港政府啲白痴先覺得呢個城冇­用, 要快拆, 不知所謂

  • @raneejessie : 係呀, 我同你係有啲出入架

    [Reply by YanSteven] : 大家都是政事有心人。

    .

  • thank you steven

  • @ballroomrocker : thank you steven

    [Reply by YanSteven] : thx a lot ... my friend.

  • Hong Kong should learn from European culture to preserve old histry buildings. Should not pay too much attention to money benefit. Spiritual memory cannot be valued.

  • @darneyui : ...Hong Kong should learn from European culture ..

    [Reply by YanSteven] : yes.. u right .

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more