Kant: Atheism, God, Empricism and Rational Thought

[Goddoesexist]

That which has the ontological necessities to account for and to be the foundation and fount for the Laws of Logic would be incapable of error or change while it has an eternal and infinite equality of diversity and unity. Only theism provides these attributes.

[Goddoesexist]

An epistemic starting that affirms universals and immutables and accounts for them yields a rational analysis that shows the possibility of the world's coherence or meaningfulness. Non-theism assumes this as it contemplates and postulates notions of our world, yet fails to furnish those universals/immutables.

[maxine2win]

A static fuzzy picture makes a very a cruddy video

[klaibigula]

PQ truely pathetic!

[Goddoesexist]

The non-theist has primary rational commitments to tautologies; they have a epistemology based on brute sensual perception and they know this from sensual persecution. And the non-theist is trapped by his post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. For one to have a coherent epistemology one has to rise above matter and autonomy. The Logos has the rational endowment to bring certainty and coherence.