dizzo95 u should be a stupid if u believe and share this video. ur all lies r under of our land come and see ghalibolu there is 2 million (french,italian,greece,australia,new zeland, english and russian) beggar :D
americans have many tricks to throw a ship into enemy territory!, or destroy it themselves!, but the destruccion of a ship is ridiculous! unless the usa was supporting the allies some covert way!!!▐▐▐
@Czaendermajer recently they discoverd the ship and unknown to the citizens on board underneath the ship was army supplies guns food and ammunition the US was making a large amount of money selling weapons to the allies
still happens today!, now they hide them in humanitarian aid!, like the aid that was given to africa before & after sierra leon mass genocide!!! to illegalise independant mining companies and fuck their population even more taking away their weapons!!!, btw forever live mikhail timofeyevich kalashnikov. and may yuri orlov (real name victor boot the cia gun runner puppet!) burn in hell!▐▐▐
@kickassed Don't forget Kickass, the Americans also won at Argencourt, They won at Waterloo and at Trafalgar. They also skipped across from Valley Forge in 1864 to clear the Russians from the Crimea. Damn fine soldiers!
This is what we are taught at schools, but it is not true. I have read several books and soldiers' diaries : Actually Nivelle's offensive suceeded in conquering the "Chemin des Dames", which was a major strategic position on the western front. The Germans exhausted their reserves to stop it. Thus, "Chemin des Dames" was not a hard defeat, rather a costly victory - less costly than the pointless offensives of 1915, where 100 000s French soldiers were killed just to gain 200 meters.
You are too correct. Schools have the assumption off ww1 = bad and ww2 = good war. There seems to be this obsession with gaining countless miles as somehow indicative of victory. You are correct to point out that the capture of a strategic position which might only require the advance of a few miles is still a victory.
I would enourage you to write up your thoughts and publish them. I have seen a few of your posts and I think you truly know your stuff. Good Job
Thanks. In fact, that's what I am doing... slowly !
There is certainly no "good war". Yet, WW2 is commonly consdered "good" as it destroyed empires of evil, while WW1 is labelled "bad" as a pointless war between brother nations. Well, the Brit-French-Belgians who resisted the German 1914 invasion were deeply convinced they were defending Human Rights & International Law.
A victory was commonly measured by the prisoners & cannons captured, plus the ground taken. Nivelle's offensive fits.
I would recommend you start with a general interest piece, perhaps about the story of your Great-Uncle winning the Croix De Guerre as a way to look at the wider event of the Chemin des Dames. The research involved in that process will give you alot to think about but should help you focus on a specific angle for a more academic piece.
Particularly, the label 'The Great War' was coined by history scholars some while after the war had ended. The people of those days knew it by a more colourful name: 'The Kaiser's War'. I was told this by WWI Canadian and British veterans I had the honour to meet, years ago. Something similar occurred about legendary von Richthofen. He was known by his contemporaries as 'the little red' (le petit rouge). the 'Red Baron' label, came later.
This may be true in English-speaking countries. Yet I have a certificate, given to my great-uncle in 1917 with his Croix de Guerre won at the Chemin des Dames battle, labeled "Grande Guerre Européenne 1914-1917". Thus, the label 'Great War' was used already.
French suffered a hard defeat in "Chemin des Dames" when the Butcher Gle Nivelle sent his troops right to death ,i think more than 120 000 Fr soldiers were killed ! this pushed soldiers to refuse fighting and escape !
Well yes of course everyone knows the Americans won the war! General Pershing won it!
What a lot of garbage this is.
The US Senate held an inquiry into Pershing's behaviour on 11 Nov 1918 and the unnecessary slaughter of troops under his command on that day. The Senate's findings were not published.
One of the REAL architects of the allied "victory" was General John Monash, check him out.
Of course,everyone knows that British,and French won the war.
Ferdinand Fosh(French general)was the main responsible ,in the Second Battle of Marne in July 1918,for the counter attack that defeated the germans,in France,his relevance was such that those offensives received its own name.
And Germany in 1918 was still in perfect fighting condition,and expecting at versailles a treaty worthy of a military draw with taste of diplomatic defeat,not a treaty worthy of a crushing defeat.
America's joining helped the British and French, that can't be debated. However, I give the Brits and French 95% of the credit for carrying the field war effort for the better part of 4 years...U.S.A. didn't win the war, simply helped bring it to the treaty table quicker.
Germany got the shaft in the treaty, led directly to WW 2.
@ViriathusVingathor Without doubt they were defeated in the field, and from pascendaele onwards they just went backwards! The only two armies stronger in 1918 that they were in 1914 were the British and the late entrants; the Americans. The French and the Germans were 'hanging onto their helmet chinstraps' with exhaustion!
it wasnt at a low point that they joined it was just the coming of the end, america probably thought we will join now and make it look like we had an effect
blah blah blah
TheSonyb90 1 month ago
Ohmyf..god that video should never be seen by anybody. Pure misinformation.
sierrahun1 1 year ago
LOL At Chateau Thierry American forces under General Pershing threw back the German thrust. I suppose maybe in a hollywood movie.
1Dougy85 1 year ago
dizzo95 u should be a stupid if u believe and share this video. ur all lies r under of our land come and see ghalibolu there is 2 million (french,italian,greece,australia,new zeland, english and russian) beggar :D
halikarnassos46 1 year ago
americans have many tricks to throw a ship into enemy territory!, or destroy it themselves!, but the destruccion of a ship is ridiculous! unless the usa was supporting the allies some covert way!!!▐▐▐
Czaendermajer 1 year ago
@Czaendermajer recently they discoverd the ship and unknown to the citizens on board underneath the ship was army supplies guns food and ammunition the US was making a large amount of money selling weapons to the allies
phillip549 1 year ago
still happens today!, now they hide them in humanitarian aid!, like the aid that was given to africa before & after sierra leon mass genocide!!! to illegalise independant mining companies and fuck their population even more taking away their weapons!!!, btw forever live mikhail timofeyevich kalashnikov. and may yuri orlov (real name victor boot the cia gun runner puppet!) burn in hell!▐▐▐
Czaendermajer 1 year ago
history of ww1 1914-1918? i'm not saying anything bad about americans, but this vid is only stating that americans fought...............
paws144 1 year ago
y didnt this bitch ever mention britian or france yanks did shit all and were late by 3 years
kickassed 1 year ago
@kickassed Don't forget Kickass, the Americans also won at Argencourt, They won at Waterloo and at Trafalgar. They also skipped across from Valley Forge in 1864 to clear the Russians from the Crimea. Damn fine soldiers!
overopensights 1 year ago 2
@overopensights. excellent irony.
Wolfen443 7 months ago
Gavrilo Princip wasnt terorist!
pera95able 1 year ago
"History of World War One 1914-1918"
...
...
And they only talk about America =/
JoezettE88 2 years ago 4
There is also alot of political reasons the war started
raffyluvstaffy 2 years ago 4
This is what we are taught at schools, but it is not true. I have read several books and soldiers' diaries : Actually Nivelle's offensive suceeded in conquering the "Chemin des Dames", which was a major strategic position on the western front. The Germans exhausted their reserves to stop it. Thus, "Chemin des Dames" was not a hard defeat, rather a costly victory - less costly than the pointless offensives of 1915, where 100 000s French soldiers were killed just to gain 200 meters.
Fridomfry 2 years ago
You are too correct. Schools have the assumption off ww1 = bad and ww2 = good war. There seems to be this obsession with gaining countless miles as somehow indicative of victory. You are correct to point out that the capture of a strategic position which might only require the advance of a few miles is still a victory.
I would enourage you to write up your thoughts and publish them. I have seen a few of your posts and I think you truly know your stuff. Good Job
fp470 2 years ago
Thanks. In fact, that's what I am doing... slowly !
There is certainly no "good war". Yet, WW2 is commonly consdered "good" as it destroyed empires of evil, while WW1 is labelled "bad" as a pointless war between brother nations. Well, the Brit-French-Belgians who resisted the German 1914 invasion were deeply convinced they were defending Human Rights & International Law.
A victory was commonly measured by the prisoners & cannons captured, plus the ground taken. Nivelle's offensive fits.
Fridomfry 2 years ago
I would recommend you start with a general interest piece, perhaps about the story of your Great-Uncle winning the Croix De Guerre as a way to look at the wider event of the Chemin des Dames. The research involved in that process will give you alot to think about but should help you focus on a specific angle for a more academic piece.
fp470 2 years ago
1914 ng magsimula maghari si jesus sa lupa,,at ihagis si satanas dito sa lupa,,kya puro kaguluhan na..at kahirapan...
sweetyrose121 2 years ago
1914 ng maghari si jesus sa langit....at inihagis si satanas dito sa lupa
sweetyrose121 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Serbs are peaceful people according to whom.....more likely Nationalistic bunch who create troubles and kill innocent people
magicballz 2 years ago
short.
VykloSS 3 years ago
serbia lost the third of its population during the w w 1.
vipbeograd 3 years ago 7
@vipbeograd an entire generation of young men died in the war as well.
nukeusa911x2 10 months ago
Particularly, the label 'The Great War' was coined by history scholars some while after the war had ended. The people of those days knew it by a more colourful name: 'The Kaiser's War'. I was told this by WWI Canadian and British veterans I had the honour to meet, years ago. Something similar occurred about legendary von Richthofen. He was known by his contemporaries as 'the little red' (le petit rouge). the 'Red Baron' label, came later.
GekkoKamen 3 years ago
This may be true in English-speaking countries. Yet I have a certificate, given to my great-uncle in 1917 with his Croix de Guerre won at the Chemin des Dames battle, labeled "Grande Guerre Européenne 1914-1917". Thus, the label 'Great War' was used already.
Fridomfry 2 years ago
French suffered a hard defeat in "Chemin des Dames" when the Butcher Gle Nivelle sent his troops right to death ,i think more than 120 000 Fr soldiers were killed ! this pushed soldiers to refuse fighting and escape !
lookgooddz 2 years ago
WW1 in 1.09!
Well yes of course everyone knows the Americans won the war! General Pershing won it!
What a lot of garbage this is.
The US Senate held an inquiry into Pershing's behaviour on 11 Nov 1918 and the unnecessary slaughter of troops under his command on that day. The Senate's findings were not published.
One of the REAL architects of the allied "victory" was General John Monash, check him out.
blueycarlton 3 years ago
Of course,everyone knows that British,and French won the war.
Ferdinand Fosh(French general)was the main responsible ,in the Second Battle of Marne in July 1918,for the counter attack that defeated the germans,in France,his relevance was such that those offensives received its own name.
And Germany in 1918 was still in perfect fighting condition,and expecting at versailles a treaty worthy of a military draw with taste of diplomatic defeat,not a treaty worthy of a crushing defeat.
ViriathusVingathor 3 years ago 6
America's joining helped the British and French, that can't be debated. However, I give the Brits and French 95% of the credit for carrying the field war effort for the better part of 4 years...U.S.A. didn't win the war, simply helped bring it to the treaty table quicker.
Germany got the shaft in the treaty, led directly to WW 2.
OrigLanceR 3 years ago 4
Exactly.
ViriathusVingathor 3 years ago
see, some of us American's ain't so bad lol
OrigLanceR 3 years ago
france sufferd badly :(
clarencezer 2 years ago
@ViriathusVingathor Without doubt they were defeated in the field, and from pascendaele onwards they just went backwards! The only two armies stronger in 1918 that they were in 1914 were the British and the late entrants; the Americans. The French and the Germans were 'hanging onto their helmet chinstraps' with exhaustion!
overopensights 1 year ago
talk about a 'brief overview'...shallow is another way of putting it. is this for 1st graders?
funkyrimpler 3 years ago
so fast!!
EUsuperstate 3 years ago
wtf went o fast
chineselad 3 years ago
it wasnt at a low point that they joined it was just the coming of the end, america probably thought we will join now and make it look like we had an effect
seanowain 4 years ago
Amazing video! Very good material for classroom use for teachers :)
ANJARDIEDIE 4 years ago