Nostradamus Effect: Hitler's Blood Oath - Ep. 4 Part 5/5

[alanbourbeau24]

If i saw alot of people following Hitler's philosophy on racism and i objected to it then the next thing that would happen would people who followed Hitler would have me killed or something far worse.

[kodyf15]

Oh south you truly are the stupidest people ever. I don't care what other Jews did the Jews that were killed were innocent and killing innocents goes against all morals. Nuff said.

[rebel21ism]

Heil Hitler

[Napoleontas]

History channel is owned by Disney42% and by I&E Tv Networks that it self 42% of it is owned by Disney, which is controlled by the zionist Jew Robert Iger.

So much for "history" channel

[Napoleontas]

Yes indeed it may yet destroy the world as we know it, many of as , millions i can say, live and pray for the moment that that will happen.

[Napoleontas]

Yes they should not exist, IN OUR NATION, thats the footnote the Jew forgot to mention.

[Napoleontas]

Yes indeed, Germany was the centre of culture, and the Fuhrer will always be the eternal leader of civilized humanity.

As for to that time comment of the idiotic parasite that comments he obviously never heard about the organized murder of 14million Ukraines by the Jewish bolsheviks or Lazar kaganovits during the thirties, you know those who the Bernard baruch USA Jews helped with the lend lease act.

HONOR AND TRUTH WILL CRUSH YOUR ETERNAL INFERIORITY DARK ASPHALT OF SUBHUMANITY

[Napoleontas]

Racial purity=demonic vision according to HC, they dont even care to hide it

[lordgillen]

2:50 - 3:02 PROPAGANDA !!!

[ThothX]

LOL they called Hitler "anti-Western." These Jews don't think much of their audience, that's for sure.

[cytuber]

Notice all the Jewish talking heads?

Notice that the new hate groups mentioned were Christian and Muslim hate groups but no Jewish groups?

Notice that they don't mention those who believe they are 'god's chosen' peope and the rest of us are "cattle' solely put on this earth to serve jews?

Notice they don't mention the hatred and supreme racism in the Jewish Talmud?

Once again, if non-Jews do something, it is evil; if Jews do it, it should be ignored. Saying this is not hatred. It is fact

[chefshitpiece]

Mass murder has been around a lot longer than Hitler. Look at Hannauka, it's based on the jews slaughtering Greeks.

[hunterRAWR1]

@VisceralDecompsure your an idiot hitler did a lot more than stalin or anyone else he did a lot worse than any man worse then the anyone from napoleon to anyone else hitler did worse and being a nazi means honoring yourself an an aryan get ur facts right dumbass

[VisceralDecomposure]

Watching this made me feel like I was watching propaganda. This was completely biased and they made some exaggerated claims, many of which are not true. Both Stalin and Mao killed far more people than hitler did, and were responsible for just as much atrocities as Hitler. National Socialism isn't necessarily a bad thing, and I'm not calling myself a nazi, but we see nazism all the time. It just means putting your country and its people first. So in a way, being patriotic makes you a nazi. lol

[HokiesAndDawgs]

"Largest mass genocide of any country up until that point." - Weitzman

Completely and utterly wrong. The Holodomor, Stalin's extermination attempt of the Ukraine, murdered more than The Holocaust.....all in one year.

[panamena23]

Who is that gorgeous nazi? i mean the name of the actor?

[RizeOrDie]

you cant blame hitler. you blame the allies for mistreating the germans after the 1st world war. if the germans didnt lose so much territory and left to starve to death then hitler would never rose to power.

[TheAirForceNinja]

@RizeOrDie If you honestly believe in that, you're one of the dumbest people ever to walk this Earth.

[RizeOrDie]

@TheAirForceNinja and why is that, you made that remark without any back up. are you stupid, do you know what happened to germany after ww1? do you know how much land they lost? do you know how much money they had to pay the allies? it was so much money that the whole amount was never even paid. so much money that the economy collapsed.

[kennytan93]

@TheAirForceNinja

Perhaps you need some Real History Lessons?

Treaty of Versailles: Germany, the loser of the First World War was ordered to give over the strip of land known as the Alsace-Lorraine to France.Industrial amenities from Saar was to send all its products to France, and it was Germany's major industrial area at that time. Germany had no way to earn to pay the 132 billion Reichsmarks, resulting in rampant inflation during the Weimar government> Hitler's Rise (and saved the economy)

[0p3nureyez]

@kennytan93 Germany didnt loose the first war, its called an "armistace", Germany just got screwed over when it came time for the treaty, Germany and Russia were treated as losers, Germany gave up the Rhineland and was ordered to pay 30billion (just as you said), although Germany didnt have to pay it all at once or even close, they payments wouldnt have been done until the 1970s maybe? I think it may have been longer even, Hitler just used the treaty to fuel his arguements/speeches.

[0p3nureyez]

@RizeOrDie It wasnt only that either, Hitler himself even stated that if the Allies would have prohibted him from entering the Rhineland he would of stopped right there, meaning no WW2

[RizeOrDie]

@0p3nureyez i doubt it, only words... hitler was arrested and when released he got back to doing the same thing... WW2 was imminent becuase it would have came later even if hitler wasnt there. the soviet union was planning to expand...

[ASexyChef]

@RizeOrDie The soviet union did expand, it was called the cold war, so umm how is that proof it would of happened, I think if you had a conflect in upper asia minor between germany and the soviet union its possible the rest of the west would of just ignored it. Hence no world war, but please tell us exactly how things would of gone great prophet, what numbers should I pick for the lottery, and I guess Japan would of still taken over the south pasific if it stayed an isolationist country too?lol

[RizeOrDie]

@ASexyChef The soviet union didnt expand after world war 2, the only expansion was attacking afghanistan and trying to set up missiles in cuba which also failed... lets say ww2 never started in 1939, then the soviet union wanted to expand into poland, romania, the baltic states like it did after france and UK declared war on germany. do you think they would let stalin? i think the allies would have joined germany and all of europe defended poland, romania and the batlic states!!

[ASexyChef]

@RizeOrDie Lets say Russia was expanding into the nourthern baltic, first, and than Germany took a protectionist stance on Poland, sent troops in as "suport" which it would than have to do with other countries, not a real invasion but with the compelet confidence to anex it later on... Never invaded Belgium, ignored that front, I do not see the west honestly caring, let them take Romania, Macedonia, and all those countries nourth of Greece to protect against Communism.

[ASexyChef]

@RizeOrDie What? Well they did all that because of Germany in WWI you dumb tool, yes some of it can be rooted back to how france and england punished them after WWI, that it set in motion for the enviroment for a hitler to be able to rise to power, but to say ooo you have to blame all that happened on who france and england ummm. Nope your clearly an idiot sorry, its like saying oo we have to blame Moses for the destruction of the Jewish temple, cause if they would just of worship caesar....

[RizeOrDie]

@ASexyChef the story of moses is completely irrelevant. take you're head out of you're ass and look at it the right way... yugoslav nationalists assassinated Ferdinand, king of austra which triggered ww1. so hungary-austra declared war on serbia. FAIR Retaliation!! then russia declares on on hungary-austra, UNFAIR. so germany declares war on russia, FAIR aid, then france declares war on germany and drags UK into the war... when they assassinate you're king you have full right to retaliate!

[ASexyChef]

@RizeOrDie Its as relevant as your statment, it is suposed to sound stupid, because yours is.. Grasp that, and Germany would of been vastly smarter to not of gone west, if he just took up Austria, Poland, "anexing them" lol... After Russia, and I grasp the assianation, but those stupid ties really are ones from back when royals controled germany and they honestly could of ignored it. Too be pulled into an all out war, when they could easily of done proxy bull for a few years.

[ASexyChef]

@RizeOrDie It was stupid, let them go at it and sell them nice German tanks, cars, etc.. Build up sell hungary and austria, all those supplies, let them defend against the russians and than come in as the great army of liberations, and than unify them, that would of been the smarter thing, he would of force russia to make the first move, and send troops far out over extending themselves right off the bat. And after they take both countries, Germany having that much more time to build up

[ASexyChef]

@RizeOrDie Than when he took out most of the russian army he would of had a much greater chance of taking the oil fields, and could of built up more of a oil suply in the first place before going to war. Germany could of moved east and france would of just done nothing, he would of liberated the other countries, and taking poland, moving into take russian oil fields, taken the baltic states, England, and the US would of done nothing at that time. Hold off and than invade the east.

[RizeOrDie]

@ASexyChef you really have no idea what you're talking about... go study world war 2, read about the evnts, agreements, alliances, goals of each country... i'm not going to explain it to you but i will say this, go study ww1 and ww2....

[ASexyChef]

@RizeOrDie I know exactly the alliances, and what your talking about, but they steam from historical treaties going back long before that time. Most of those traditional alliances/treaties, go back to royal marriages, and you need to go back further than WWII to grasp that. England and France didn't get pulled into them, they were sick of war, because of WWI. So Germany could of held off, with the same claim. They choice not too, and they went to war.. Maybe you should read outside

[ASexyChef]

@RizeOrDie Your college, history basic class and grasp, the fact that, not all treaties and alliances are fallowed. It was their choice to go to war over them, but they never HAD TO DO ANYTHING... It was Hilter/Nazi Choice, grasp that, and stop spewing out facts word for word that professor whomever told you...