Hello Salman first of all i want to thank you for all your efforts.Salman when you draw this picture andwhen you applied Tangent on both of the triangles you said that both of the angles were equal to theta well i want to ask that if we separate these theta as theta1 and theta2.will they will be also equal to each other after considering them as theta1 and 2 :)
I think the instruction is wrong. There are no way that degree is 90 degree. The length of is 1m and 2m and the ending length is still 1m and 2m so there are no way that angle is 90 and therefore it cannot use tan(theta) to calculate.
Too complex - Very complicated all round. Use similar triangles instead of all that trig., same angle twice as large. Very complicated all round. Also your argument is circular. You assume the conservation of energy is the same at the conservation of work done and that is what you prove.
@willraytaylor: Feel free to correct the assertion I am about to make, but your comment puts me in total ambiguity. How could conservation of energy and conservation of work not be the same? Energy and work are the same thing: energy is the ability to do work, and work is the energy used to do work. These are two phenomena are intrinsically the same manifestations, they can’t be different, so I completely failed to see your point.
Mr. Khan, even if you're lifting the object upwards, how can u have a 90 degrees triangle. Because i mean, the lenth of the lever didnt extend or anything, it's the same lever. So, even if the lever turns upwards, it has to move in a circular motion.
Another way u can look at it is, it's like a clock. 1 m = hour hand 2 m = minute hand,
it's just turning around like a circle. having 90 degrees thr is actually impossible.
@sharikokaine176 you're absolutely correct, but despite the trig error he is still correct because the proportions are still the same. The proportion of the sin(theta) to 2sin(theta) is the same as tan(theta) to 2tan(theta). (1:2 is still 1:2)
honestly sal, this is amazing. i dont know if you respond to comments but thanks. i have a physic exam in 40 mins. and i knew nothing. i had NO idea you made physic videos......i knew you made calculus videos, which helped me alot last semester....i wish i would have know about these physic videos earlier but thanks much sal. i appreciate it. you explain it so well
@marcellohro that would be the inductive method...you gather the data, insert it in a graph, and you use simple 9th grade mathematics to solve the problem.
This has been flagged as spam show
thnks you helped me study for my test
MrPEDOCTOR 3 weeks ago
where the fuck is more moments?
goldensilverstar 1 month ago
my fav subject
adamaqmal 1 month ago
Hello Salman first of all i want to thank you for all your efforts.Salman when you draw this picture andwhen you applied Tangent on both of the triangles you said that both of the angles were equal to theta well i want to ask that if we separate these theta as theta1 and theta2.will they will be also equal to each other after considering them as theta1 and 2 :)
shayan894 2 months ago
you messed up on your angles, the hypotenuses would be 1m and 2m. they stay the same length but shift an angle theta
Xlaxsauce 6 months ago
im in grade 7.. and its pretty confusing but i understand a little... well done though
IveSoGotThePow 8 months ago
I think the instruction is wrong. There are no way that degree is 90 degree. The length of is 1m and 2m and the ending length is still 1m and 2m so there are no way that angle is 90 and therefore it cannot use tan(theta) to calculate.
MozillaEgg 9 months ago
@MozillaEgg i agree with u !!! thats what i was just saying !!! :)
hanansleman 6 months ago 4
Amazing how smoothly and intuitively you introduce moments... You are incredible sal..
parklinkin52 11 months ago
My mind is blown by this fact of nature... How the hell is this possible? Maybe there is a god... He was definately a mathematician..
parklinkin52 11 months ago
@parklinkin52 mathemaphysicist? haha
kbdalcour18 3 months ago
How could this possibly be too complex? View the other videos before this one you lazy bastards...
parklinkin52 11 months ago
Yeah I would have gone with similar triangles.
Gaiacarra 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Meet hot sexy Naughty women now ***mworld5.info***
BellaFayec 1 year ago
Too complex - Very complicated all round. Use similar triangles instead of all that trig., same angle twice as large. Very complicated all round. Also your argument is circular. You assume the conservation of energy is the same at the conservation of work done and that is what you prove.
willraytaylor 1 year ago
@willraytaylor yes too complex, I didnt even take triginometry. but all of your other vids are very use ful
MisticalWater 1 year ago
@willraytaylor: Feel free to correct the assertion I am about to make, but your comment puts me in total ambiguity. How could conservation of energy and conservation of work not be the same? Energy and work are the same thing: energy is the ability to do work, and work is the energy used to do work. These are two phenomena are intrinsically the same manifestations, they can’t be different, so I completely failed to see your point.
MarvelsofaLifetime 11 months ago
Mr. Khan, even if you're lifting the object upwards, how can u have a 90 degrees triangle. Because i mean, the lenth of the lever didnt extend or anything, it's the same lever. So, even if the lever turns upwards, it has to move in a circular motion.
Another way u can look at it is, it's like a clock. 1 m = hour hand 2 m = minute hand,
it's just turning around like a circle. having 90 degrees thr is actually impossible.
sharikokaine176 1 year ago 4
@sharikokaine176 you're absolutely correct, but despite the trig error he is still correct because the proportions are still the same. The proportion of the sin(theta) to 2sin(theta) is the same as tan(theta) to 2tan(theta). (1:2 is still 1:2)
LennyM 1 year ago
great...great...you are my master...........
uzamabinladhan 1 year ago 3
honestly sal, this is amazing. i dont know if you respond to comments but thanks. i have a physic exam in 40 mins. and i knew nothing. i had NO idea you made physic videos......i knew you made calculus videos, which helped me alot last semester....i wish i would have know about these physic videos earlier but thanks much sal. i appreciate it. you explain it so well
matrixener 2 years ago
Isn't the force times distance equal to the torque?
calvinhobbesliker2 2 years ago
force times distance is work, buddy
oliver54321 1 year ago
should have used sin instead of tan... but you get the same answer in the end.
mojaven 2 years ago 3
this helps explain it so well, thanx sal!
erinashleyx 2 years ago
thx this help a bit for a very confusing test on mechanical advantage
habsfan12325 2 years ago
thnks you helped me study fopr my test
CanadasWonderland08 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Im learning this type of stuff right now in grade 8. And well you made it way too complicated, well, i am a 13 year old.
To calculate the MA of a lever is Load divide by Effort.
Or Effort Arm divided by Load Arm
RomanianSoccerFan 3 years ago
are you in advanced class's
echocompany540 3 years ago 3
it`s easy to just apply the formula, but it`s hard to understand where the formula comes from.
marcellohro 3 years ago 8
@marcellohro that would be the inductive method...you gather the data, insert it in a graph, and you use simple 9th grade mathematics to solve the problem.
Verradonairun 1 year ago
your learning physical science not physics
benjoandrichie 2 years ago