Im still wondering, what is the sole existence of us human beings? Some say for survival and continuation, some say for experience what you may never experience if you hadnt exist. But what is the real purpose of our lifes?
@theyasin33 ::: Are you speaking of astronomy and astrology? Did you not notice the phrase "used to be"? They are not "completely different", since they both deal with movement of the heavenly bodies.
You should consider an online philosophy class. I am in your ethics class and I really think people would be intersted in taking philosphy classes on line instead of being in class. These videos are really good.
Plato, and other philosophers before him (most notably, Pythagoras), had an extremely mystical view of numbers and of math. Think of the computer code in the virtual world of the Matrix (the movie). Neo's virtual world would be analogous to our visible world, i.e., not entirely real. The real world, for Plato, would be the computer code (the topos noetos). From Plato's perspective, if you could read the code (mathematics), you would be able to understand the nature of ultimate reality.
@wmiller24 Exactly! Aristote's view on numbers wasn't mystical (I wouldn't really say that Plato's was either), but he considers numbers as really ontologically existing (like physical objects). They are just from a different matter then perceivable objects. (That's in Metaphysics book Eta)
Thanks, extremly useful to sum up and overview the essence of these main thoughts, especially at these late hours!
donthavetoargue 19 hours ago
Theory of Forms can be refuted by one word, evolution ..
theyasin33 1 month ago
Im still wondering, what is the sole existence of us human beings? Some say for survival and continuation, some say for experience what you may never experience if you hadnt exist. But what is the real purpose of our lifes?
Gunbardo 1 month ago
@Gunbardo No ones knows, philosophy has tried to answer that question but failed .. No ones knows ..
theyasin33 1 month ago
when you say plato is sounds like play dough. :) lol
TheElisabethJ 8 months ago
Excellent exposition!
astrologue 1 year ago
Very useful video, cleared up a lot of confusion.
Eliminatrixxx 1 year ago
Astronomy and astrology used to be the same thing.
k0smon 1 year ago
@k0smon No, they are completely different things.
theyasin33 1 month ago
@theyasin33 ::: Are you speaking of astronomy and astrology? Did you not notice the phrase "used to be"? They are not "completely different", since they both deal with movement of the heavenly bodies.
k0smon 1 month ago
@k0smon Sry, I misread, didn't see "used to."
theyasin33 1 month ago
TY for posting this!
3leftsandaright 1 year ago
thank you
Alter3The3Young 2 years ago
No more Playdo 4 me, I move on to dialectic materialisme commi style.
isleofyew1 2 years ago
Thanks WMiller24 for uploading these very informative videos.
EclipseOfReason1984 2 years ago 2
I forgot to mention: there is no 'thing-in-itself'.
EvoinOZ 2 years ago
Aristotle's ontology was rather a mess, in my view. But he did give us A=A, the basis for all philosophy, so I thank him for that.
Talking of a table's 'purpose' is nonsensical. Ironically, it seems, he didn't understand the power of 'identity' in regard to forms himself.
EvoinOZ 2 years ago
Thanks you soooooooooo much. Great video.
mmjjddxoc6 2 years ago
"There is no form without matter, there is no matter without form"
=)
Why everyone philosophy teacher
is always giving an example with TABLE ?! In Poland, in Cracow, we have the same: "let`s talk about table..." :)
Beniek1987Krakow 3 years ago 3
Do you have a video on Aristotle's DeAnima?
pyongkwan 3 years ago
You should consider an online philosophy class. I am in your ethics class and I really think people would be intersted in taking philosphy classes on line instead of being in class. These videos are really good.
oxoheath 3 years ago
How do you consider Plato and mystic, but concede he relies on mathematics? Aren't the two almost complete opposites?
coreydmont 3 years ago
Plato, and other philosophers before him (most notably, Pythagoras), had an extremely mystical view of numbers and of math. Think of the computer code in the virtual world of the Matrix (the movie). Neo's virtual world would be analogous to our visible world, i.e., not entirely real. The real world, for Plato, would be the computer code (the topos noetos). From Plato's perspective, if you could read the code (mathematics), you would be able to understand the nature of ultimate reality.
wmiller24 3 years ago 5
To me the computer code in The Matrix is a great analog for the 'neutral monist' concept. A wotrldview I'm toying with.
Interested in your thoughts on that, if any.
EvoinOZ 2 years ago
@wmiller24 Exactly! Aristote's view on numbers wasn't mystical (I wouldn't really say that Plato's was either), but he considers numbers as really ontologically existing (like physical objects). They are just from a different matter then perceivable objects. (That's in Metaphysics book Eta)
Abandonedmachine 1 year ago
I'm glad I can be of assistance.
wmiller24 3 years ago 4
You are helping me pass my exam. Thanks!
haakoan 3 years ago
Thanks for the info!!!
neblonski 3 years ago
Nice. It was good.
cuagulus 3 years ago