If laws are made by a minority with only there interests in mind, What difference does it make who enforces or judges them. If the law itself is unjust, it is still a law and will be enforced. It is all a dog and pony show. Again to keep the majority divided. so the united minority can continue to rule us by any meens they see fit.
This video is so hilarious it's mind boggling, hint hint conservatives, recognizing experiences make you a better judge is not "racist". Also, in the Ricci case she ruled on precedent, it would have been activist for her to rule in favor of the firefighters since she was an appelate judge, not a supreme court judge.
It's funny how conservatvies think the judiciary is just a rubber stamp robotic institution, maybe some of you should study a little law before making idiotic video's like this.
Who cares? Her entire point is that PERSPECTIVE matters! What should anyone care that a Latina is on the court? Antonin Scalia is on there, and he hates FREEDOM!
i dont give a fuck about ehtics, heritage, or age. What we need on the suprememn court are people that can interpret the law without bringing these issues into their decision. Sotomayor has talked for years against the very virtues that our supreme court justices must have and now shes gonna have a spot? This is fucking rediculous
Dude! How can you misspell SO many words but spell 'fucking' correctly? Use Spell Check or at the very least buy a goddamned spelling primer or a children's dictionary
I do not like what I see. Obama does not love the free United States of America like we love it. He wasn't even born here. His view point is that of Jealousy, and hate. He wants to cut down our pride... Make us all equal, make our nation equal to all other nations. Of course he would appoint someone like Sonya Sotamyj;kljdfiouer.
i agree to some extent. However, dont you agree that ethics are based on morailty, and upbringing? There are diff. types of ethics & the type of ethics a person chooses to use is based on there culture, thoughs, ideas, background ect...........to some extent
Judge Sotomayor was a member of a three judge panel that decided in favor of the city's decision to throw out the results of a promotion exam because not enough minority candidates scored well. It's a pending Supreme Court case
We cannot have this racist socialist who doesn't understand the constitution or her job in office. The republicans better stand up or there will be dire consequenses.
Sotomayor is against the US Constitution and should not be allowed to sit on the bench of the highest court of the land, The United States Supreme Court to intrepret our Constitution!
She cannot interpret the Constituion because she doesn't even understand it. And because she doesn't understand the eleventh amendent wich states her job and she is in complete contradiction to that, she doesn't even understand what her job is and therefore can't do it.
Sotomayor doesn't believe in the US Constitution. Her abysmal record proves my point. If you don't believe in something you cannot take an oath to uphold it.
She also quoted Norman Thomas, a socialist leader who was the presidential candidate for the Socialist Party multiple times, in her yearbook to sum up her philosophy. The quote she used said, "I am not a champion of lost causes but of causes not yet won."
Why'd she quote a socialist leader if she isn't a socialist? And why are we even thinking about putting her in the highest court in the land?
"Judge me by the people I choose as my advisors" Adlai Stevenson, a great orator and Democratic presidential candidate from Illinois. Stevenson was also a character witness for Alger Hiss, a UN official & accused Russian spy, whose wife was also a Socialist Party member.
What is it with the Democrats from the state of Illinois?
If laws are made by a minority with only there interests in mind, What difference does it make who enforces or judges them. If the law itself is unjust, it is still a law and will be enforced. It is all a dog and pony show. Again to keep the majority divided. so the united minority can continue to rule us by any meens they see fit.
paulhasarrived 1 year ago
This video is so hilarious it's mind boggling, hint hint conservatives, recognizing experiences make you a better judge is not "racist". Also, in the Ricci case she ruled on precedent, it would have been activist for her to rule in favor of the firefighters since she was an appelate judge, not a supreme court judge.
It's funny how conservatvies think the judiciary is just a rubber stamp robotic institution, maybe some of you should study a little law before making idiotic video's like this.
Gravy2468 2 years ago
Who cares? Her entire point is that PERSPECTIVE matters! What should anyone care that a Latina is on the court? Antonin Scalia is on there, and he hates FREEDOM!
CommanderDESU 2 years ago 4
i dont give a fuck about ehtics, heritage, or age. What we need on the suprememn court are people that can interpret the law without bringing these issues into their decision. Sotomayor has talked for years against the very virtues that our supreme court justices must have and now shes gonna have a spot? This is fucking rediculous
hotblud82 2 years ago
Dude! How can you misspell SO many words but spell 'fucking' correctly? Use Spell Check or at the very least buy a goddamned spelling primer or a children's dictionary
ecoflame 2 years ago
I do not like what I see. Obama does not love the free United States of America like we love it. He wasn't even born here. His view point is that of Jealousy, and hate. He wants to cut down our pride... Make us all equal, make our nation equal to all other nations. Of course he would appoint someone like Sonya Sotamyj;kljdfiouer.
jwellsboy 2 years ago
EXCELLENT!
KLONDIKEpsychic 2 years ago
Did she take an oath to tell the TRUTH in her Senate Confirmation Hearing ??
kentube59 2 years ago
Excellent and thought provoking video. Funny how such things get overlooked by the media. 5*
FleetwoodFactor 2 years ago 2
no decision should be based on ethnicity or gender or religion
just law and ethics
argonne5 2 years ago 4
i agree to some extent. However, dont you agree that ethics are based on morailty, and upbringing? There are diff. types of ethics & the type of ethics a person chooses to use is based on there culture, thoughs, ideas, background ect...........to some extent
delreynian 2 years ago
Judge Sotomayor was a member of a three judge panel that decided in favor of the city's decision to throw out the results of a promotion exam because not enough minority candidates scored well. It's a pending Supreme Court case
GiovannaNYC 2 years ago 3
and they wonder why they're called the "drive by media"
they're incapable of coming to their own conclusion. they all feed off of each other
lindaclements 2 years ago 3
Great video!
We cannot have this racist socialist who doesn't understand the constitution or her job in office. The republicans better stand up or there will be dire consequenses.
conservativeco 2 years ago 2
Sotomayor is against the US Constitution and should not be allowed to sit on the bench of the highest court of the land, The United States Supreme Court to intrepret our Constitution!
GiovannaNYC 2 years ago 2
Agreed.
She cannot interpret the Constituion because she doesn't even understand it. And because she doesn't understand the eleventh amendent wich states her job and she is in complete contradiction to that, she doesn't even understand what her job is and therefore can't do it.
conservativeco 2 years ago 2
Sotomayor doesn't believe in the US Constitution. Her abysmal record proves my point. If you don't believe in something you cannot take an oath to uphold it.
GiovannaNYC 2 years ago
She also quoted Norman Thomas, a socialist leader who was the presidential candidate for the Socialist Party multiple times, in her yearbook to sum up her philosophy. The quote she used said, "I am not a champion of lost causes but of causes not yet won."
Why'd she quote a socialist leader if she isn't a socialist? And why are we even thinking about putting her in the highest court in the land?
conservativeco 2 years ago
Cecilla Munox is Barack Obama's White House director of intergovernmental affairs. She is also a socialist. See a pattern?
GiovannaNYC 2 years ago
"Judge me by the people I choose as my advisors" Adlai Stevenson, a great orator and Democratic presidential candidate from Illinois. Stevenson was also a character witness for Alger Hiss, a UN official & accused Russian spy, whose wife was also a Socialist Party member.
What is it with the Democrats from the state of Illinois?
GiovannaNYC 2 years ago
They thought they could lay low in Illinois until the...
As Sparrow would put it...
"Opportune moment".
MaXG65 2 years ago