Added: 2 years ago
From: newsbusted
Views: 7,467
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • She's not bad, the laugh tracks are obviously fake....but so are all the sitcoms, so why not?

  • Maybe talk to me when your mum doesn't have to watch over your shoulder when you are on a computer. Until then, get an emo haircut. Like, whatever.

  • Bush did everything great. If don't agree you are stupid...and a terrorist.

  • Bill Gates, really? Again with the straw man. Unreal how impossible it is to engage with you on an intellectual or logical level. I have not said that he was old, nor unintelligent. I have merely said that I trust his opinion regarding the topic of climate change less than I trust a majority of accredited climatologists. If you can't read my posts and see that, then there is clearly no point in discussing the issue further with you. As to bigotry, me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

  • Your comment makes no sense.

  • I was unclear. I referred to him as an EPA economist, not an (EPA) scientist. As for calling me a bigot, you have stooped to ad hominem attacks without refuting any of my arguments. I haven't called anyone here names, but you have accused people of engaging in sodomy and accused me of being ignorant and bigoted, without engaging on a civil level with the questions I've posed. Not very Christian or enlightened.

  • I notice your misspelling of Palin. Did you mean to type "Failin'"? Sarah Palin quit her post on the Alaska Oil and Gas Commission to run for governor, as well as quitting as governor. Two weeks notice? What does she think this is, Home Depot? She also stated that ethics investigation into her activities cost the state $2M, when in REALITY it cost less than $300k. Never let the facts get in the way of a good media conspiracy yarn.

  • Carlin is not a CLIMATE SCIENTIST. Nor is he employed by the EPA as a scientist. Physics is not climate science, nor is economics. I wouldn't go to a dentist for heart surgery, would you?

  • so only the scientists with a vested interest in pushing the Global Warming agenda are qualified to speak on the issue?

    So by your reasoning, only Dr's should have a say in health care. They are the experts and everyone else should defer to them.

    Again, get a clue

  • No, by my reasoning, the EPA is not required to release reports on climate change by employees who are not qualified to speak on that issue. Clearly, no one has prevented Dr. Carlin from speaking on the issue as a citizen. All that has happened is that the EPA refused to issue his flawed report as an official EPA document. Not much of a story.

  • Al Gore isn't qualified to speak on it either. Why does everyone believe a politician. Hell the hockey stick graph he uses in his movie.............FALSE SCIENCE and it was proven that even before he made the movie. He put it in there anyway. Now who's lying to who? What do some gain by promoting CC? Money! Even Obama said your electric bill would "necessarily skyrocket" under cap and trade. That's a tax on the poor my friend. Is that what you want? CC is about controlling the people.

  • They believe that if a politician said it then it must be true.

  • You're wrong about my reasoning. A closer analogy to my statement would be to say that the Department of Health has no obligation to publish as official doctrine the opinions of an employee hired to research cancer medicines if those opinions regard the economic impact of implementing a single-payer system.  Just because someone works for the EPA doesn't mean they know everything about climate change.

  • tom.......

    Funny, funny, funny! That's about the as real as you can get. Here in a Lib/Commie town the BO Turd stickers are becoming endangered.

  • Everybody.

  • He earned his degree in Physics in the 1950s. His doctorate is in ECONOMICS (hence, his job). I didn't mention Al Gore. You've demonstrated a favorite tactic of the flawed logician, the Straw Man, often utilized by Republicans to derail an argument. It would be like me saying, speaking of Dr. Carlin's qualifications, how does Sarah Palin repeatedly quitting jobs mean she's not a quitter? One has nothing to with the other, and you have not refuted the argument that his "report" was flawed.

  • Being that you Lib/Commie/Demo/Freedomsellout­s know best you tell us when and where we have let facts get in the way of your Commie truth.

  • Show us the 'Flawed' Memo Commie!

  • Sounds like you are spouting Liberal talking points. The facts mean nothing to a liberal.

  • I'm waiting for someone to explain the ulterior motivation behind reducing greenhouse gases. I get why large companies whose profits depend on less regulation and lax environmental policy want to push these ends.  What is the gain for Al Gore or the EPA, or any environmentalist, to conserve the environment, beyond a healthier planet?

  • What is the gain for Al Gore? hmmm let me see... fame, money, Nobel Peace Prize. oh I guess he just did it out of the goodness of his heart.

    get a clue

  • Fame, money and the Nobel Prize all had nothing to do with why he would fight to reduce greenhouse gases. Besides he was already pretty rich and famous. I'm talking about causes. What is the reward for reducing C02 to an environmentalist? As opposed to what is the reward to an energy company to mislead the public as to the consequences of their industry being unregulated? If you think Gore made "An Inconvenient Truth" because he knew he'd win the Nobel, you give him too much credit.

  • "Fame, money and the Nobel Prize all had nothing to do with why he would fight to reduce greenhouse gases." And you know this because? what makes you right and me wrong? I contend that he got into the GW scare for his own personal advancement, you say it was his altruism. What makes you right and me wrong? NOTHING!! your belief does not make it so. and tha fact that the earth is no longer warming and hasen't been for years would lend weight to my argument

  • Climate change, not global warming. 2 distinct concepts. The nuance may have escaped you. Scientists haven't used the term global warming for years now. I've never said you were wrong. I just think you're assertions are not likely to be factually correct. You still haven't answered my question as to what is the benefit to a person trying to convince others to reduce consumption or their carbon footprint. As for scares for personal advancement, how about Beck, Savage, O'Reilly, Fox, et al.

  • Climate change, right. I forgot they had to change the terminology when the facts didn't back up the theory.

    Climate change... the climate is always changing, it has been in a state of change since the earth was formed.

    and the people you listed don't make a large part of their wealth by giving speaches on the topic they make a fake documentory about

  • This is growing tiresome. 1. The issue is man's effect on the environment producing accelerated climate change. This is not disputed by anyone respected in the field. 2. The use of the term "theory" does nothing to attack the credibility of the idea. Our ideas of gravity are theory. 3. Al Gore does not make "a large part" of his wealth by giving speeches. 4. Now how about right wing media figures cashing in on Obama-hysteria? Or monetary motives for climate change deniers?

  • You are wrong about climate change, look up what Michael Crichton has to say on the subject.

    However, this program is incredibly lame. I have just found it by accident and I am shocked of how bad it really is and the fake laughter just makes it worse....

  • Why is it that people keep pointing to the opinions of a few lone rogues rather than the overwhelming majority of climate scientists? Michael Crichton wrote some great novels. His career as a scientist is less impressive. Why are right-wingers so afraid of admitting the fact that man is having a negative impact on the planet? I seriously don't get it.

  • Just for the record, I consider myself a liberal. To me Crichton was just the first step to becoming more reasonable on this subject, I started doing research on Global Warming because of him. Seriously, look it up, take a look at the other side of the argument. I know Glenn Beck and people like him are crazy, so don't listen to them, listen to scientists. Michael Crichton's book has all the info if you want to do research on Global Warming.

  • yes

  • guess you didn't find it funny because its not about your country.

  • Yes.

  • I did.

  • I'm mostly left wing but i have to admit that these guys make some good points and are at least as funny as Jon Stewart - and a lot funnier than Colbert. I find them so amusing that i often post their work on my own website, that's how good they are.

  • "i'm not a quitter, I'm a fighter so I quit!"---Sarah Palin

    Don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way out Sarah.

  • You are very funny but I got to admit that you do sound like a bitter fox news pundit at times.

  • that was horrid i think they need to check the date on the canned laughter i think it went bad.

  • Comment removed

  • Now that was not funny.

  • Check the date on BO the Muslim Turds' last Press Conference - I was recorded from there.

  • Love NewsBusted, but those "Marines" were soldiers, in the Army. Marines have different uniform.

  • If you really want to see funny look who the new MN Senator is. Now you have a Murderer, a Fag who ran a Homo-Prostitution Ring out of his home, A Security Info leaker, a KKK Recruiter, 2 War Bucks Women etc.etc.etc.etc and now a short pudgy slug sucking comic as Dem/Commie/Lib Senators.

    You couldn't make that funny stuff up if you tried.

  • Painful enough to immobilize you? If not then then quit whining. Or we'll up it.

  • She only makes fun of Dems. Its ok. I still watch her. She's funny.

  • she talked about palin...

  • Great stuff, as always--but please don't post pictures of soldiers when you're talking about Marines! :)

  • Which is more pathetic, SNL or MN?

  • Right now I say its a toss up, or a throw up.

  • It's nice that MN FINALLY has two senators!!

  • That would be Senilors.

  • Well ya really don't have two senators; one senator and one Acorn encrusted, mindless, leftist.

  • First Jesse the Body Ventura and now Al Franken. Congrats to Minnesota voters, they sure know how to pick em.

  • Yeah. It's obvious that the voters didn't look at voting records, because Norm Colman voted by what people asked him to. Many Republicans called him Wishy-Washy because his platform was based on what his constituents said, NOT the party. I asked Senator Klobuchar to vote one way and I got a letter stating that wasn't her platform or not what the democratic party stood for. I DON'T CARE! lol I'm telling you how to vote. I PAY YOU! YOU WORK FOR ME!

  • Palin has been accused of

    1) cruel to Animals

    2) claiming her daughters baby is hers

    3) being stupid

    4) being selfish

    5) having affairs

    6) being a bad mother

    7) Getting her son in the Army because he was about to charge with selling drugs

    So you say other politicians have received the same kind on their families? Family is off limits with anybody. Yet, the media gladly did NOT play by that rule.

  • You hit it on the HEAD!

  • Quano.

    That means bacteria infested Bat Shit!

    I had a short - and I mean short talk with a Lib/Commie/Democrat yesterday. Following his no stop ( Libs have a problem with a 2 sided conversation ) parade of non-fact facts I managed to get a few corrections in. In true Lib/Commie form he got pissy like a sissy and stormed off.

    Your accusations about Palin are no different - non-facts.

    And your name sums up your anti-Palin rant - bacteria infested Bat Shit.

  • You can't even get being wrong right.

    Try paying attention, David Letterman did not make fun of Sarah. he basicaly called her 14 year old daughter a slut.

    I guess if it were you, you would find it funny if someone accused Arod of knocking up your 14 year old at a ball game.

  • 57 states

  • That is 'Rattia with Mud Sauce'.

    Dope and Scam for Dessert?

  • Give the doctor a raise.

  • 5 stars

    *****

  • She's funny. Wish she was a Libertarian

  • what do you think she is???

  • A VERY HOT LIBERTARIAN!

  • She's a hot something. Seems like a Republican though. Still very hot.

  • 5 Stars

    *****

  • Good Video

  • Excellent, as always. Thank you:)

  • Big Opps! Sorry C. slow mouse - meant to hit the Thumbs up.

  • No problem. I've done that before myself. Thank you:)

  • Just like your posts. Keep being you,

  • only thing news has reported on this week is the dead negro

  • Great episode. Love NB'ers

  • The holiday is Independence Day, not the 4th of July. Though by the time Obama leaves office it might be changed to "dependence" -- since the government will control every aspect of our lives.

  • not many people probably know Korea has been launching so many rockets, since MJ died, but from what I heard Biden say the WH is doing is ignoring Korea because they just want attention....gotta love that foreign policy they have.

  • Lookin' hot as ever Jodi. ;-)

  • What, no news about Steve McNair?

    Not bad this week. The three jokes start with Palin/Fey were good.

  • "[Members of the] News media have barely reported on it."

  • Welcome BACK, Jode et al! Consider yourself missed!

  • Spike is a hater.

  • Why isn't this show on television? They could make a fortune in advertising.

  • Because the "Lame stream"media wouldn't allow any dissenting conservative opinions IMHO.

  • stumbled onto this out of the blue just now...

    5stars with ease~

  • not arizona :)

  • Where would we be without you, Newsbusted??!! Keep on rockin'!!

  • Five Stars!!

  • Jodi Rocks! Great Commentary (as usual).

  • Great job!!!!

    And, oh yes - First!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more