Bill Gates, really? Again with the straw man. Unreal how impossible it is to engage with you on an intellectual or logical level. I have not said that he was old, nor unintelligent. I have merely said that I trust his opinion regarding the topic of climate change less than I trust a majority of accredited climatologists. If you can't read my posts and see that, then there is clearly no point in discussing the issue further with you. As to bigotry, me thinks the lady doth protest too much.
I was unclear. I referred to him as an EPA economist, not an (EPA) scientist. As for calling me a bigot, you have stooped to ad hominem attacks without refuting any of my arguments. I haven't called anyone here names, but you have accused people of engaging in sodomy and accused me of being ignorant and bigoted, without engaging on a civil level with the questions I've posed. Not very Christian or enlightened.
I notice your misspelling of Palin. Did you mean to type "Failin'"? Sarah Palin quit her post on the Alaska Oil and Gas Commission to run for governor, as well as quitting as governor. Two weeks notice? What does she think this is, Home Depot? She also stated that ethics investigation into her activities cost the state $2M, when in REALITY it cost less than $300k. Never let the facts get in the way of a good media conspiracy yarn.
Carlin is not a CLIMATE SCIENTIST. Nor is he employed by the EPA as a scientist. Physics is not climate science, nor is economics. I wouldn't go to a dentist for heart surgery, would you?
No, by my reasoning, the EPA is not required to release reports on climate change by employees who are not qualified to speak on that issue. Clearly, no one has prevented Dr. Carlin from speaking on the issue as a citizen. All that has happened is that the EPA refused to issue his flawed report as an official EPA document. Not much of a story.
Al Gore isn't qualified to speak on it either. Why does everyone believe a politician. Hell the hockey stick graph he uses in his movie.............FALSE SCIENCE and it was proven that even before he made the movie. He put it in there anyway. Now who's lying to who? What do some gain by promoting CC? Money! Even Obama said your electric bill would "necessarily skyrocket" under cap and trade. That's a tax on the poor my friend. Is that what you want? CC is about controlling the people.
You're wrong about my reasoning. A closer analogy to my statement would be to say that the Department of Health has no obligation to publish as official doctrine the opinions of an employee hired to research cancer medicines if those opinions regard the economic impact of implementing a single-payer system. Just because someone works for the EPA doesn't mean they know everything about climate change.
He earned his degree in Physics in the 1950s. His doctorate is in ECONOMICS (hence, his job). I didn't mention Al Gore. You've demonstrated a favorite tactic of the flawed logician, the Straw Man, often utilized by Republicans to derail an argument. It would be like me saying, speaking of Dr. Carlin's qualifications, how does Sarah Palin repeatedly quitting jobs mean she's not a quitter? One has nothing to with the other, and you have not refuted the argument that his "report" was flawed.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hey by the way, the "EPA staff memos" that the President has "suppressed" was a flawed memo written by an EPA ACCOUNTANT, not a scientist. And as for it "not being reported," it has been. And it's been debunked. But when have the facts ever gotten in the way of a good Republican talking point?
I'm waiting for someone to explain the ulterior motivation behind reducing greenhouse gases. I get why large companies whose profits depend on less regulation and lax environmental policy want to push these ends. What is the gain for Al Gore or the EPA, or any environmentalist, to conserve the environment, beyond a healthier planet?
Fame, money and the Nobel Prize all had nothing to do with why he would fight to reduce greenhouse gases. Besides he was already pretty rich and famous. I'm talking about causes. What is the reward for reducing C02 to an environmentalist? As opposed to what is the reward to an energy company to mislead the public as to the consequences of their industry being unregulated? If you think Gore made "An Inconvenient Truth" because he knew he'd win the Nobel, you give him too much credit.
"Fame, money and the Nobel Prize all had nothing to do with why he would fight to reduce greenhouse gases." And you know this because? what makes you right and me wrong? I contend that he got into the GW scare for his own personal advancement, you say it was his altruism. What makes you right and me wrong? NOTHING!! your belief does not make it so. and tha fact that the earth is no longer warming and hasen't been for years would lend weight to my argument
Climate change, not global warming. 2 distinct concepts. The nuance may have escaped you. Scientists haven't used the term global warming for years now. I've never said you were wrong. I just think you're assertions are not likely to be factually correct. You still haven't answered my question as to what is the benefit to a person trying to convince others to reduce consumption or their carbon footprint. As for scares for personal advancement, how about Beck, Savage, O'Reilly, Fox, et al.
This is growing tiresome. 1. The issue is man's effect on the environment producing accelerated climate change. This is not disputed by anyone respected in the field. 2. The use of the term "theory" does nothing to attack the credibility of the idea. Our ideas of gravity are theory. 3. Al Gore does not make "a large part" of his wealth by giving speeches. 4. Now how about right wing media figures cashing in on Obama-hysteria? Or monetary motives for climate change deniers?
You are wrong about climate change, look up what Michael Crichton has to say on the subject.
However, this program is incredibly lame. I have just found it by accident and I am shocked of how bad it really is and the fake laughter just makes it worse....
Why is it that people keep pointing to the opinions of a few lone rogues rather than the overwhelming majority of climate scientists? Michael Crichton wrote some great novels. His career as a scientist is less impressive. Why are right-wingers so afraid of admitting the fact that man is having a negative impact on the planet? I seriously don't get it.
Just for the record, I consider myself a liberal. To me Crichton was just the first step to becoming more reasonable on this subject, I started doing research on Global Warming because of him. Seriously, look it up, take a look at the other side of the argument. I know Glenn Beck and people like him are crazy, so don't listen to them, listen to scientists. Michael Crichton's book has all the info if you want to do research on Global Warming.
I'm mostly left wing but i have to admit that these guys make some good points and are at least as funny as Jon Stewart - and a lot funnier than Colbert. I find them so amusing that i often post their work on my own website, that's how good they are.
If you really want to see funny look who the new MN Senator is. Now you have a Murderer, a Fag who ran a Homo-Prostitution Ring out of his home, A Security Info leaker, a KKK Recruiter, 2 War Bucks Women etc.etc.etc.etc and now a short pudgy slug sucking comic as Dem/Commie/Lib Senators.
You couldn't make that funny stuff up if you tried.
Yeah. It's obvious that the voters didn't look at voting records, because Norm Colman voted by what people asked him to. Many Republicans called him Wishy-Washy because his platform was based on what his constituents said, NOT the party. I asked Senator Klobuchar to vote one way and I got a letter stating that wasn't her platform or not what the democratic party stood for. I DON'T CARE! lol I'm telling you how to vote. I PAY YOU! YOU WORK FOR ME!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sarah like so many conservatives can dish it out but can't take it when it comes right back. Shes a quitter not a fighter. Why? Too much pressure for her to be a fighter. Sarah Palin quit as governer "of the great state of Alaska," because David Letterman made fun of her.
7) Getting her son in the Army because he was about to charge with selling drugs
So you say other politicians have received the same kind on their families? Family is off limits with anybody. Yet, the media gladly did NOT play by that rule.
I had a short - and I mean short talk with a Lib/Commie/Democrat yesterday. Following his no stop ( Libs have a problem with a 2 sided conversation ) parade of non-fact facts I managed to get a few corrections in. In true Lib/Commie form he got pissy like a sissy and stormed off.
Your accusations about Palin are no different - non-facts.
And your name sums up your anti-Palin rant - bacteria infested Bat Shit.
The holiday is Independence Day, not the 4th of July. Though by the time Obama leaves office it might be changed to "dependence" -- since the government will control every aspect of our lives.
not many people probably know Korea has been launching so many rockets, since MJ died, but from what I heard Biden say the WH is doing is ignoring Korea because they just want attention....gotta love that foreign policy they have.
She's not bad, the laugh tracks are obviously fake....but so are all the sitcoms, so why not?
lakeeriejew 2 years ago
Maybe talk to me when your mum doesn't have to watch over your shoulder when you are on a computer. Until then, get an emo haircut. Like, whatever.
JollyMunkie 2 years ago
Bush did everything great. If don't agree you are stupid...and a terrorist.
JollyMunkie 2 years ago
Bill Gates, really? Again with the straw man. Unreal how impossible it is to engage with you on an intellectual or logical level. I have not said that he was old, nor unintelligent. I have merely said that I trust his opinion regarding the topic of climate change less than I trust a majority of accredited climatologists. If you can't read my posts and see that, then there is clearly no point in discussing the issue further with you. As to bigotry, me thinks the lady doth protest too much.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
Your comment makes no sense.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
I was unclear. I referred to him as an EPA economist, not an (EPA) scientist. As for calling me a bigot, you have stooped to ad hominem attacks without refuting any of my arguments. I haven't called anyone here names, but you have accused people of engaging in sodomy and accused me of being ignorant and bigoted, without engaging on a civil level with the questions I've posed. Not very Christian or enlightened.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
I notice your misspelling of Palin. Did you mean to type "Failin'"? Sarah Palin quit her post on the Alaska Oil and Gas Commission to run for governor, as well as quitting as governor. Two weeks notice? What does she think this is, Home Depot? She also stated that ethics investigation into her activities cost the state $2M, when in REALITY it cost less than $300k. Never let the facts get in the way of a good media conspiracy yarn.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
Carlin is not a CLIMATE SCIENTIST. Nor is he employed by the EPA as a scientist. Physics is not climate science, nor is economics. I wouldn't go to a dentist for heart surgery, would you?
tpmarczak 2 years ago
so only the scientists with a vested interest in pushing the Global Warming agenda are qualified to speak on the issue?
So by your reasoning, only Dr's should have a say in health care. They are the experts and everyone else should defer to them.
Again, get a clue
pwf2412 2 years ago
No, by my reasoning, the EPA is not required to release reports on climate change by employees who are not qualified to speak on that issue. Clearly, no one has prevented Dr. Carlin from speaking on the issue as a citizen. All that has happened is that the EPA refused to issue his flawed report as an official EPA document. Not much of a story.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
Al Gore isn't qualified to speak on it either. Why does everyone believe a politician. Hell the hockey stick graph he uses in his movie.............FALSE SCIENCE and it was proven that even before he made the movie. He put it in there anyway. Now who's lying to who? What do some gain by promoting CC? Money! Even Obama said your electric bill would "necessarily skyrocket" under cap and trade. That's a tax on the poor my friend. Is that what you want? CC is about controlling the people.
kournikova76 2 years ago 12
They believe that if a politician said it then it must be true.
issanel 2 years ago
You're wrong about my reasoning. A closer analogy to my statement would be to say that the Department of Health has no obligation to publish as official doctrine the opinions of an employee hired to research cancer medicines if those opinions regard the economic impact of implementing a single-payer system. Just because someone works for the EPA doesn't mean they know everything about climate change.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
tom.......
Funny, funny, funny! That's about the as real as you can get. Here in a Lib/Commie town the BO Turd stickers are becoming endangered.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
Everybody.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
He earned his degree in Physics in the 1950s. His doctorate is in ECONOMICS (hence, his job). I didn't mention Al Gore. You've demonstrated a favorite tactic of the flawed logician, the Straw Man, often utilized by Republicans to derail an argument. It would be like me saying, speaking of Dr. Carlin's qualifications, how does Sarah Palin repeatedly quitting jobs mean she's not a quitter? One has nothing to with the other, and you have not refuted the argument that his "report" was flawed.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey by the way, the "EPA staff memos" that the President has "suppressed" was a flawed memo written by an EPA ACCOUNTANT, not a scientist. And as for it "not being reported," it has been. And it's been debunked. But when have the facts ever gotten in the way of a good Republican talking point?
tpmarczak 2 years ago
Being that you Lib/Commie/Demo/Freedomsellouts know best you tell us when and where we have let facts get in the way of your Commie truth.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
Show us the 'Flawed' Memo Commie!
TheTMA1 2 years ago
Sounds like you are spouting Liberal talking points. The facts mean nothing to a liberal.
amboy362 2 years ago
I'm waiting for someone to explain the ulterior motivation behind reducing greenhouse gases. I get why large companies whose profits depend on less regulation and lax environmental policy want to push these ends. What is the gain for Al Gore or the EPA, or any environmentalist, to conserve the environment, beyond a healthier planet?
tpmarczak 2 years ago
What is the gain for Al Gore? hmmm let me see... fame, money, Nobel Peace Prize. oh I guess he just did it out of the goodness of his heart.
get a clue
pwf2412 2 years ago
Fame, money and the Nobel Prize all had nothing to do with why he would fight to reduce greenhouse gases. Besides he was already pretty rich and famous. I'm talking about causes. What is the reward for reducing C02 to an environmentalist? As opposed to what is the reward to an energy company to mislead the public as to the consequences of their industry being unregulated? If you think Gore made "An Inconvenient Truth" because he knew he'd win the Nobel, you give him too much credit.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
"Fame, money and the Nobel Prize all had nothing to do with why he would fight to reduce greenhouse gases." And you know this because? what makes you right and me wrong? I contend that he got into the GW scare for his own personal advancement, you say it was his altruism. What makes you right and me wrong? NOTHING!! your belief does not make it so. and tha fact that the earth is no longer warming and hasen't been for years would lend weight to my argument
pwf2412 2 years ago
Climate change, not global warming. 2 distinct concepts. The nuance may have escaped you. Scientists haven't used the term global warming for years now. I've never said you were wrong. I just think you're assertions are not likely to be factually correct. You still haven't answered my question as to what is the benefit to a person trying to convince others to reduce consumption or their carbon footprint. As for scares for personal advancement, how about Beck, Savage, O'Reilly, Fox, et al.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
Climate change, right. I forgot they had to change the terminology when the facts didn't back up the theory.
Climate change... the climate is always changing, it has been in a state of change since the earth was formed.
and the people you listed don't make a large part of their wealth by giving speaches on the topic they make a fake documentory about
pwf2412 2 years ago 2
This is growing tiresome. 1. The issue is man's effect on the environment producing accelerated climate change. This is not disputed by anyone respected in the field. 2. The use of the term "theory" does nothing to attack the credibility of the idea. Our ideas of gravity are theory. 3. Al Gore does not make "a large part" of his wealth by giving speeches. 4. Now how about right wing media figures cashing in on Obama-hysteria? Or monetary motives for climate change deniers?
tpmarczak 2 years ago
You are wrong about climate change, look up what Michael Crichton has to say on the subject.
However, this program is incredibly lame. I have just found it by accident and I am shocked of how bad it really is and the fake laughter just makes it worse....
neoldd1 2 years ago
Why is it that people keep pointing to the opinions of a few lone rogues rather than the overwhelming majority of climate scientists? Michael Crichton wrote some great novels. His career as a scientist is less impressive. Why are right-wingers so afraid of admitting the fact that man is having a negative impact on the planet? I seriously don't get it.
tpmarczak 2 years ago
Just for the record, I consider myself a liberal. To me Crichton was just the first step to becoming more reasonable on this subject, I started doing research on Global Warming because of him. Seriously, look it up, take a look at the other side of the argument. I know Glenn Beck and people like him are crazy, so don't listen to them, listen to scientists. Michael Crichton's book has all the info if you want to do research on Global Warming.
neoldd1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They're still making these? Who's losing money on this?
tpmarczak 2 years ago
yes
pwf2412 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
every "joke" in this clip was so terrible. Seriously, did ANYONE laugh at ANY of this crap?
JohannMint 2 years ago
guess you didn't find it funny because its not about your country.
lolarocks9 2 years ago 2
Yes.
Ready4PrimeTime 2 years ago
I did.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
I'm mostly left wing but i have to admit that these guys make some good points and are at least as funny as Jon Stewart - and a lot funnier than Colbert. I find them so amusing that i often post their work on my own website, that's how good they are.
PorkyDomesticus 2 years ago 2
"i'm not a quitter, I'm a fighter so I quit!"---Sarah Palin
Don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way out Sarah.
lighwave 2 years ago
You are very funny but I got to admit that you do sound like a bitter fox news pundit at times.
adibisi22 2 years ago
that was horrid i think they need to check the date on the canned laughter i think it went bad.
hollowpoint84 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheTMA1 2 years ago
Now that was not funny.
mykol13v 2 years ago
Check the date on BO the Muslim Turds' last Press Conference - I was recorded from there.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
Love NewsBusted, but those "Marines" were soldiers, in the Army. Marines have different uniform.
jjsalmiya 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh my god. the stupid it hurts me.
The "unfunny" here is literally painful.
If you want to see some ACTUALLY funny conservative humor, check out RedStateUpdate. This crap is embarassing.
mattyfking 2 years ago
If you really want to see funny look who the new MN Senator is. Now you have a Murderer, a Fag who ran a Homo-Prostitution Ring out of his home, A Security Info leaker, a KKK Recruiter, 2 War Bucks Women etc.etc.etc.etc and now a short pudgy slug sucking comic as Dem/Commie/Lib Senators.
You couldn't make that funny stuff up if you tried.
TheTMA1 2 years ago 2
Painful enough to immobilize you? If not then then quit whining. Or we'll up it.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
She only makes fun of Dems. Its ok. I still watch her. She's funny.
psychientology 2 years ago
she talked about palin...
PatricksTime 2 years ago
Great stuff, as always--but please don't post pictures of soldiers when you're talking about Marines! :)
Q2600vlog 2 years ago
Which is more pathetic, SNL or MN?
AllanR2D2 2 years ago
Right now I say its a toss up, or a throw up.
amboy362 2 years ago
It's nice that MN FINALLY has two senators!!
joebrueske 2 years ago
That would be Senilors.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
Well ya really don't have two senators; one senator and one Acorn encrusted, mindless, leftist.
jimbeauxtexas 2 years ago
First Jesse the Body Ventura and now Al Franken. Congrats to Minnesota voters, they sure know how to pick em.
amboy362 2 years ago 2
Yeah. It's obvious that the voters didn't look at voting records, because Norm Colman voted by what people asked him to. Many Republicans called him Wishy-Washy because his platform was based on what his constituents said, NOT the party. I asked Senator Klobuchar to vote one way and I got a letter stating that wasn't her platform or not what the democratic party stood for. I DON'T CARE! lol I'm telling you how to vote. I PAY YOU! YOU WORK FOR ME!
joebrueske 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sarah like so many conservatives can dish it out but can't take it when it comes right back. Shes a quitter not a fighter. Why? Too much pressure for her to be a fighter. Sarah Palin quit as governer "of the great state of Alaska," because David Letterman made fun of her.
Yoganao 2 years ago
Palin has been accused of
1) cruel to Animals
2) claiming her daughters baby is hers
3) being stupid
4) being selfish
5) having affairs
6) being a bad mother
7) Getting her son in the Army because he was about to charge with selling drugs
So you say other politicians have received the same kind on their families? Family is off limits with anybody. Yet, the media gladly did NOT play by that rule.
angelhalsey 2 years ago 10
You hit it on the HEAD!
Downie1949 2 years ago 2
Quano.
That means bacteria infested Bat Shit!
I had a short - and I mean short talk with a Lib/Commie/Democrat yesterday. Following his no stop ( Libs have a problem with a 2 sided conversation ) parade of non-fact facts I managed to get a few corrections in. In true Lib/Commie form he got pissy like a sissy and stormed off.
Your accusations about Palin are no different - non-facts.
And your name sums up your anti-Palin rant - bacteria infested Bat Shit.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
You can't even get being wrong right.
Try paying attention, David Letterman did not make fun of Sarah. he basicaly called her 14 year old daughter a slut.
I guess if it were you, you would find it funny if someone accused Arod of knocking up your 14 year old at a ball game.
pwf2412 2 years ago
57 states
FlyingFreak67 2 years ago
That is 'Rattia with Mud Sauce'.
Dope and Scam for Dessert?
TheTMA1 2 years ago
Give the doctor a raise.
specialks1953 2 years ago 2
5 stars
*****
Eimhin1 2 years ago 5
She's funny. Wish she was a Libertarian
psychientology 2 years ago
what do you think she is???
quirogai 2 years ago
A VERY HOT LIBERTARIAN!
TheTMA1 2 years ago
She's a hot something. Seems like a Republican though. Still very hot.
psychientology 2 years ago
5 Stars
*****
xiaogoudelaohu 2 years ago
Good Video
Jaimetud 2 years ago
Excellent, as always. Thank you:)
chattingcat 2 years ago
Big Opps! Sorry C. slow mouse - meant to hit the Thumbs up.
TheTMA1 2 years ago
No problem. I've done that before myself. Thank you:)
chattingcat 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The laugh track kind of makes this lamer.
hoosierhiver 2 years ago
Just like your posts. Keep being you,
amboy362 2 years ago
only thing news has reported on this week is the dead negro
bilpayne 2 years ago
Great episode. Love NB'ers
LordAtrocities 2 years ago 2
The holiday is Independence Day, not the 4th of July. Though by the time Obama leaves office it might be changed to "dependence" -- since the government will control every aspect of our lives.
TheVampirella 2 years ago 9
not many people probably know Korea has been launching so many rockets, since MJ died, but from what I heard Biden say the WH is doing is ignoring Korea because they just want attention....gotta love that foreign policy they have.
jpopaholic 2 years ago 5
Lookin' hot as ever Jodi. ;-)
sakahowdah 2 years ago 4
What, no news about Steve McNair?
Not bad this week. The three jokes start with Palin/Fey were good.
HaikenEdge 2 years ago 3
"[Members of the] News media have barely reported on it."
red33410 2 years ago 3
Welcome BACK, Jode et al! Consider yourself missed!
red33410 2 years ago 6
Spike is a hater.
bertly71 2 years ago 8
Why isn't this show on television? They could make a fortune in advertising.
issanel 2 years ago 9
Because the "Lame stream"media wouldn't allow any dissenting conservative opinions IMHO.
djmars1983 2 years ago
stumbled onto this out of the blue just now...
5stars with ease~
azis1100 2 years ago 6
not arizona :)
Robert697 2 years ago 3
Where would we be without you, Newsbusted??!! Keep on rockin'!!
pukipaco 2 years ago 7
Five Stars!!
MadBadVoodo 2 years ago 8
Jodi Rocks! Great Commentary (as usual).
satirewriter07 2 years ago 7
Great job!!!!
And, oh yes - First!
dayfornight176 2 years ago 6